Abstract
Excessive alcohol intake is associated with a multitude of health risks, especially for women. Recent studies in animal models indicate that the female brain is more negatively affected by alcohol, compared to the male brain. Among other regions, excessive alcohol consumption damages the frontal cortex, an area important for many functions and decision making of daily life. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in female rats is selectively vulnerable to alcohol-induced damage. In humans, loss of prefrontal grey matter resulting from heavy alcohol consumption has been documented, however this volume loss is not necessarily due to a decrease in the number of neurons. We therefore quantified both number and nuclear volume of mPFC neurons following binge alcohol, as well as performance and neuronal activation during a prefrontal-dependent behavioral task. Adult male and female Long-Evans rats were assigned to binge or control groups and exposed to ethanol using a well-established 4-day model of alcohol-induced neurodegeneration. Both males and females had significantly smaller average neuronal nuclei volumes than their respective control groups immediately following alcohol binge, but neither sex showed a decrease in neuron number. Binged rats of both sexes initially showed spatial working memory deficits. Although they eventually achieved control performance, binged rats of both sexes showed increased c-Fos labeling in the mPFC during rewarded alternation, suggesting decreased neural efficiency. Overall, our results substantiate prior evidence indicating that the frontal cortex is vulnerable to alcohol, but also indicate that sex-specific vulnerability to alcohol may be brain region-dependent.
Keywords: alcohol, c-Fos, medial prefrontal cortex, nuclear volume, sex differences
1.0 Introduction
Excessive alcohol intake contributes to at least 30 different diseases affecting nearly all systems of the body1. Globally, among people ages 15–49, alcohol use is the leading risk factor for premature death and disability2. In addition to the well-known short-term health risks, excessive alcohol use can also lead to the development of serious problems such as heart disease, stroke, cancer, cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, unemployment, social problems, alcohol dependence, and brain damage3. For women especially, there is an increased risk of negative consequences from alcohol consumption, including alcohol-related incident fatalities, heart disease, stroke, suicide, liver cirrhosis, and death4. Although women tend to consume less alcohol and have a shorter duration of intake than men, long term heavy consumption is more likely to harm a woman’s health and, potentially, damage the brain4. Both human and animal studies suggest that females may be uniquely vulnerable to the harmful neurological effects of alcohol5–12, although not all studies show this13,14.
Using a rodent model of alcohol-induced neurodegeneration, we have recently shown sex differences in hippocampal damage and cognitive impairment15. Like the hippocampus, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is alcohol-vulnerable, and loss of prefrontal grey matter has been well-documented in human alcoholics16–18. Some volume recovery occurs with abstinence19,20, and this combined with evidence showing that volume loss is not equivalent to neuronal loss21,22, suggests that the primary issue is with cell shrinkage, not loss. In the present study, we used archived tissue from our study of sex differences in alcohol-induced hippocampal damage and quantified the number and volume of neuron nuclei in the mPFC. The karyoplasmic ratio, or the ratio between cell body and nucleus volume, is maintained at a constant value within the cell 23–25. Therefore, we hypothesized that binged female rats, but not male, would show a decrease in nuclear volume in the mPFC when compared to same-sex controls.
We have also recently shown that sex differences in hippocampal damage after binge alcohol are associated with spatial learning impairment in female rats, but not males15. This finding prompted us to investigate whether binge alcohol would result in sex differences in a prefrontal cortex-mediated cognitive task. The frontal cortex is critical for a wide variety of tasks, including motor function, emotional processing, problem solving, spontaneity, memory, language, spatial orientation, judgment, impulse control, working memory, and social behavior26–28. To test for sex differences in mPFC functioning following alcohol exposure, we tested rewarded alternation (RA) performance with a short inter-trial interval to target working memory29, in a second cohort of male and female rats. We predicted that binged females, but not males, would show impairment compared to same-sex controls.
Cognitive efficiency is another consideration when evaluating alcohol-related damage. Even in the absence of observed cognitive or behavioral deficits, brain damage may still have occurred, as is evident in other forms of brain injury like asymptomatic traumatic brain injury or stroke30–32. Increased frontal activation has been observed in human frequent binge drinkers during tests of working memory33, cognitive control34, and spatial attention35, indicating the recruitment of more neuronal resources to achieve behavioral performance comparable to controls. The neural efficiency hypothesis is that more intelligent individuals require less neural activation to achieve the same performance outcome36,37. Following this line of logic, increased neuronal activation during a cognitive task would be indicative of decreased efficiency. In the present study, we analyzed activation of mPFC neurons in animals that underwent the RA task. It was predicted that binged females, but not males, would show increased c-Fos expression compared to control animals during the rewarded alternation test, indicating decreased cognitive efficiency resulting from binge alcohol.
2.0 Material and Methods
2.1 Animals
All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Houston (#14-013). To assess mPFC neuron number and volume directly after binge alcohol, archived tissue from 27 male and female rats (8 female binge, 6 female control, 7 male binge, 6 male control) from a prior study15 was used (Cohort 1). To probe for sex differences in binge alcohol effects on spatial working memory, mPFC neuronal number and volume and task-induced activation, 39 male and female rats (9 female binge, 10 female control, 10 male binge, 10 male control) were used (Cohort 2). Except where noted, procedures were identical between the cohorts.
Upon arrival (from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN, USA) at 8 weeks of age, rats spent one week acclimating to vivarium conditions, which included same-sex housing (2–3 per cage) in clear Plexiglas cages, ad libitum rat chow and water and a reversed light/dark cycle (lights off at 9:00/on at 21:00). During the acclimation period, rats were handled to make them accustomed to the experimenters. Next, rats were randomly assigned to the following groups: male control, male binge, female control and female binge. Rats then underwent 4 days of binge alcohol (or control diet) and were either sacrificed the day the binge ended (Cohort 1), or following 4 days of abstinence and 5 days of rewarded alternation testing (Cohort 2).
2.2 Binge Ethanol Administration
Food was removed from both control and experimental groups prior to the first dose of ethanol or control solution and replaced after the final dose, although water was always available. Animals received either the ethanol diet (25% ethanol w/v in nutritionally complete diet; vanilla Ensure Plus™) or isocaloric control diet (dextrose in vanilla Ensure Plus™) given every 8 hours over 4 days via intragastric gavage, according to a paradigm modified from Majchrowicz38 as previously described8,39,40.
The initial loading dose of ethanol diet was 5 g/kg. Thereafter, animals were dosed according to their behavioral intoxication, based on the Majchrowicz scale (0, normal rat; 1, hypoactive; 2, ataxia; 3, ataxia with dragging abdomen and/or delayed righting reflex; 4, loss of righting reflex; 5, loss of eye blink reflex). Each of these scores has an accompanying dose of ethanol between 0 and 5 g/kg, such that a higher score (higher observed behavioral intoxication) corresponds to a lower dose. Behavioral intoxication was assessed immediately before each dose of alcohol was administered. This method maintains consistent intoxication relevant to an alcohol use disorder (AUD) while avoiding mortality39,41. Control animals were given the average volume of fluid that their same-sex alcohol group received for each dose. To determine blood ethanol concentration (BEC), blood was drawn from the lateral saphenous vein 90 minutes following the seventh dose of ethanol. Samples were immediately centrifuged, then extracted serum was stored at −80°C until analysis. Samples were analyzed using an AM1 Analyzer (Analox, MA, USA), based on external standards.
Some evidence suggests that female rats may have increased ethanol sensitivity during certain phases of the estrous cycle42,43. Thus, in order to control for this variability in animals undergoing cognitive testing, all female rats in Cohort 2 received their first dose of control or alcohol diet when they were in the diestrus stage of their cycle. Vaginal smears of both female binge and control groups were taken between 8:00 and 9:00 daily, beginning 5–7 days prior to the first alcohol or control dose. Each sample was placed on a glass slide, stained with cresyl violet, and then coverslipped. Stage of estrous was determined by examining samples under a light microscope at 10x magnification.
2.3 Withdrawal
Because Cohort 2 was sacrificed 9 days post-binge, spontaneous withdrawal symptoms were monitored every 30 minutes for hours 10–26 after the last dose, which encompasses the peak withdrawal period38. Every 30 minutes, the most severe observed withdrawal symptom was scored using the scale created by Penland and colleagues44. Red lights were used during the dark phase of the light cycle so as not to disrupt the animals’ circadian rhythms.
2.4 Spatial Working Memory Task
The rewarded alternation (RA) task relies on rodents’ natural inclination to alternate areas of exploration in a new environment and rewards them for correctly alternating choice arms. Working memory, a prefrontal cortex dependent function, is engaged by using a short inter-trial interval (ITI), as rats must recall which arm they most recently visited to obtain access to the food pellet reward29,45. Prior to the 4-day binge, all rats were habituated in home cage groups to the T-maze, which is an apparatus made of clear Plexiglas, with three guillotine doors secured in metal brackets which can be raised and lowered by the experimenter. During habituation, all doors were raised and unlimited food reward pellets (chocolate 45mg Dustless Precision Pellets®, Bio-Serv, NJ, USA) were present in both food dishes located at the end of each choice arm. Also during this time, food pellets were placed into each home cage so rats could become accustomed to searching out pellets in a familiar environment. Throughout behavior testing, rats were food-restricted so that they were adequately motivated to seek out the food reward. Because all rats (controls and binged) lose body weight (9–20%) during the 4-day binge, afterwards, each animal was either food restricted or fed ad libitum to reach 85–90% of their pre-binge body weight by the start of the spatial working memory task. During behavior testing, each rat was weighed daily and given food rations accordingly to maintain the range of 85–90% of their original free-feeding weight.
Day 1 of behavioral testing began on the fourth day of alcohol abstinence and was conducted at the beginning of the animals’ active cycle. Each rat began testing by being placed in the starting area, and allowed to settle behind the starting guillotine door. Rats received one forced trial followed by ten choice trials in succession each day, for five days. For the forced trial, one of the two reward arms (randomly chosen) was opened, forcing the rat to visit that arm. For the choice trials, the guillotine door was lowered behind the animal once both hindlimbs crossed into a chosen arm, thus confining it to that arm. Once the rat had spent either 10 seconds in the reward arm or eaten all the reward pellets, it was immediately picked up and placed back at the start. Trials 2–11 were conducted with a 15 second ITI, with the rats able to freely choose which arm they visited. Rats found a three-pellet reward only in the bowl in the arm opposite that of which they visited on the previous trial, however, pellet dust was present in both reward dishes so rats could not use olfactory cues to determine which dish contained the reward. Thus, the animal had to employ the use of working memory to remember which arm they most recently visited and choose the other arm to receive a reward 29,45. The maze was spot cleaned between trials and wiped down with a 70% ethanol solution between animals.
2.5 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
One hour after completing the last RA trial, rats were overdosed with anesthetic and intracardially perfused with saline, then 4% paraformaldehyde until the neck was stiff. Brains were extracted, post-fixed overnight and then stored at 4°C in 30% sucrose. Serial coronal sections (50 μm) were collected on a freezing sliding microtome (Leica, Bannockburn, IL) and stored in 96-well microtiter plates at −20°C in cryoprotectant.
To visualize neuronal cell bodies, a 1-in-6 series of tissue sections from the mPFC (~6 sections per animal, spaced 300 μm apart) were immunohistochemically processed for the neuronal marker, NeuN. Sections were rinsed 3 times (10 minutes each) in 0.1 M Tris buffered saline (TBS) at room temperature (RT), followed by a 30-minute treatment with 0.6% hydrogen peroxide. After this, sections were once again rinsed in TBS three times for 10 minutes each. Next, they were blocked for 60 minutes in 3% normal donkey serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), then incubated in the primary antibody (guinea pig anti-NeuN, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA; 1:1,000) at 4°C. After 72 hours, the sections were rinsed twice (15 minutes each) in TBS, and then incubated in secondary antibody (donkey anti-guinea pig biotinylated, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA, 1:250) for 24 hours at RT. Sections were then underwent another 3 10-minute TBS washes before being treated for 60 minutes in avidin-biotin complex (ABC, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). After 3 more 10- minute rinses in TBS, the sections were reacted in diaminobenzidine (DAB). After a final four 10-minute TBS rinses, the sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, counterstained with methyl green, cover-slipped and coded so that the investigator performing cell counts remained blind to experimental condition.
For visualization of c-Fos, the IHC protocol of Cholvin and colleagues46 was used. Sections were first floated three times in 0.05 M Phosphate Buffer (PBS) for ten minutes each. After the PBS rinses, sections were floated in sodium citrate for 10 minutes at 90°C. Following another 3 PBS rinses, sections were placed in a blocking solution of 5% normal donkey serum for 1 hour. Following blocking, sections were incubated in the primary antibody (mouse anti-c-Fos, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA, 1:100) at RT for 18 hours. Next, sections were washed 3 times for 10 minutes each in PBS and then incubated in the secondary antibody (biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit, Jackson ImmunoResearch, PA; 1:250) for 1 hour. Following three more PBS washes, the sections were incubated in ABC for 45 minutes, given two more rinses in PBS, then a single ten-minute rinse in TBS. Next, sections were reacted in DAB and then rinsed another three times in PBS before being mounted. Slides were cleared in xylene for 5 minutes, then cover slipped and coded.
2.6 Stereology
The mPFC area for cellular analysis included the infralimbic, prelimbic, and anterior cingulate cortices between Bregma 3.9 mm and 2.2 mm47 (see Figure 1A). The total population of NeuN+ cells in the mPFC was estimated using the optical fractionator, and neuronal volume estimated using the nucleator probe, both of which were applied via StereoInvestigator (MBF Bioscience, Williston, VT). The mPFC was traced at 4X and NeuN+ cells counted within 2-dimensional counting frames (40 × 40 μm) at 100x, using a grid size of 400 × 400 μm. Total population (N) of NeuN+ cells was estimated using the following formula:
where Q- is the number of cells counted, h is the mounted section thickness, asf is the area sampling fraction and ssf is the section sampling fraction. The volume of each counted NeuN+ cell nucleus was determined by the nucleator probe, which works within the optical fractionator workflow in order to measure the area and volume of each nucleus counted within the sampling frames. The probe creates rays at a random orientation that emanate from the center point of the cell, which is arbitrarily designated by the investigator, and the points at which the rays intersect with the boundary of the cell is marked (Figure 1). Nuclear volume is calculated using the formula for the volume of a sphere, where the radius of the sphere was determined by using the average length of measured rays for each cell. To estimate the total population of c fos+ cells, similar optical fractionator procedures were followed, except that the counting frame size was 80 × 80 μm.
Figure 1.
Area of interest for cell quantification in the mPFC, which included the infralimbic, prelimbic, and anterior cingulate cortices (A). Screenshot of nucleator probe working within the optical fractionator workflow in StereoInvestigator software (B). Points at which the rays intersect the boundary of the nuclei are manually marked and the average radius is used to estimate the volume of each nucleus.
2.7 Statistical Analysis
Male and female ethanol doses and BECs were compared using an independent group t-test. Behavioral intoxication and spontaneous withdrawal scores are ordinal data and were therefore compared between males and females using Mann-Whitney testing. Pearson correlations were performed to examine the relationship between behavioral intoxication and mean withdrawal score, with correlation significance determined by using the critical value table for Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient. A three-way mixed factorial design with Time as the repeated measure was used to evaluate T-maze percent correct alternations for the variables Time, Sex and Diet as well as the interactions of these three variables. Neuronal data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA with the variables Sex, Diet and the Sex x Diet interaction. All values are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Planned Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons were used when appropriate. Results from statistical tests were deemed significant if the p-value was less than 0.05 and all analyses were run using SAS 9.4.
3.0 Results
3.1 Neuronal number and volume in the mPFC immediately post-binge
Figure 2 depicts results from analysis of tissue harvested immediately following 4-day binge alcohol. The tissue analyzed was archived mPFC sections from a prior study of the hippocampus following binge alcohol15. As previously reported, males and females did not differ in behavioral intoxication, dose administered, BEC or withdrawal score15. There were no significant main effects of Diet [F(1,23)=2.73, p=.11] or Sex [F(1,23)=.71, p=.41] and no significant interaction [F(1,23)=.01, p=.92] on the estimated total population of NeuN+ cells present in the mPFC. There was, however, a significant main effect of Diet on neuronal volume [F(1,23)=.44, p=.0004], with no significant main effect of Sex [F(1,23)=.44, p=.52] or Diet x Sex interaction [F(1,23)=.56, p=.46]. The mean nuclear volume for both male and female binged rats was 19.9% smaller than those of their respective control groups.
Figure 2.
There was no significant effect of binge alcohol on mPFC neuronal number (A), however both female and male binged rats had a significant reduction in nucleus volume (B) in the mPFC in comparison to respective control groups immediately following a four-day binge. ****p<.0001 for Diet
3.2 Behavioral intoxication and withdrawal in rats used for behavioral analysis
Contrary to what is commonly observed in the human population48, female rats acted less behaviorally intoxicated than male rats, and thus received higher doses of alcohol [t(17)=4.81, p=.0002] (Table 1). However, despite males receiving a lower alcohol dose, male and female rats did not have significantly different blood ethanol concentrations (mg/dl) [t(17)=.18, p=.67]. Males and females also did not differ on withdrawal severity [t(17)=.57, p=.58]. There was no significant correlation between mean behavioral intoxication and mean withdrawal score [r2=.14, p=.58].
Table 1.
Alcohol Administration Measures
| Sex | Average Behavioral Intoxication | Alcohol Dose (g/kg) | Average Withdrawal Score | BEC (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 2.18 ± 0.06 | 2.79 ± 0.06 | 1.0 ± 0.01 | 404.6 ± 13.8 |
| Female | 1.68 ± 0.08* | 3.31 ± 0.08* | 1.1 ± 0.01 | 397.8 ± 8.0 |
p < 0.05 significant effect of Sex
3.3 Rewarded alternation behavior following alcohol abstinence
For percentage of correct alternations on the RA working memory task, there was a significant main effect of Diet [F(1,191)=31.24, p<.0001], and Day x Diet interaction [F(4,1946)=2.73, p=.03]. There was a significant effect of Diet on the first [F(1,191)=34.17, p<.0001], second [F(1,191)=17.28, p=.0002] and fourth [F(1,191)=5, p=.02], days of testing. (Figure 3A). Additionally, there were no significant effects of Diet or Sex for the percent of trials in which reward pellets were eaten [F(1, 191)=.05, p= 0.9760].
Figure 3.
Both female and male binged rats had fewer correct alternations than control groups, indicating impairment in spatial working memory (A). On trials 1–5 of the first testing day, both binged and control animals began with similar percentages of correct alternations. However, while control animals chose the rewarded arm correctly more often by trials 6–10 (B), binged animals did not show improvement in correct arm alternations until the third day of testing.
3.4 Neuronal number, volume and activation in the mPFC following alcohol abstinence
Following 9 days of alcohol abstinence, there were no significant effects of either Diet or Sex on mPFC neuronal population [F(1,35)=.12, p=.94] or nuclear volume [F(1,35)=.12, p=.95] (Figure 4). There was, however, a significant main effect of Diet [F(1,35)=15.25, p=.0004], on number of c fos+ cells in the mPFC (Figure 5), but no significant effect of Sex [F(1,35)=.02, p=.88] or Diet x Sex interaction [F(1,35)=.29, p=.59].
Figure 4.
After nine days of alcohol abstinence, there were no detectable differences in either neuronal number (A), or nucleus volume (B) in the mPFC based on stereological assessment.
Figure 5.
Image of c-Fos staining in the mPFC at Bregma 2.70 mm (A). Although there was no significant difference in percent correct alternations on the final day of testing, binged animals had more c-Fos+ cells in the mPFC (B), suggesting reduced neuronal efficiency. ****p<.0001 for Diet.
4.0 Discussion
Decades of data substantiate that women are more vulnerable than men to the health-related consequences of alcohol, including increased rates of organ damage49 and mortality 50,51. Prior research also indicates that the female brain may be selectively vulnerable to the harmful effects of alcohol11,12,15,52. Using a model of alcohol-induced neurodegeneration, we have recently found damage in the female hippocampus (but not the male), accompanied by spatial navigation impairment15. In the present study, we used this same model to probe for sex differences in vulnerability of the prefrontal cortex. We found males and females to be equally affected in terms of nuclear volume and number of prefrontal cortex neurons early after binge alcohol. Moreover, we found binge-induced spatial working memory impairments in both males and females. Finally, although binged animals of both sexes ultimately achieved control performance, it was associated with more neuronal activation, suggesting decreased efficiency.
The nuclei of neurons in the mPFC of binged animals of both sexes had reduced volume. Since cells retain a relatively constant ratio between nuclear volume and cell body volume23–25, this nuclear volume loss is likely indicative of grey matter atrophy, which has been previously observed in other brain areas using this model53. Although nuclear shrinking is usually indicative of cell death54,55, we did not find a reduction in the number of remaining neurons. Moreover, the reduction in nuclear volume was temporary, since after nine days of abstinence there were no detectable differences between binged and control animals. This is consistent with the natural recovery reported to occur with abstinence in humans19,20, which in the frontal cortex likely stems primarily from normalization of cell size, versus the hippocampus, in which recovery could be supported by the generation of new neurons. Moreover, it is possible that experience contributed to nuclear volume recovery, as it was coincident with achievement of control performance on the spatial working memory task.
Consistent with the lack of sex differences in alcohol-induced mPFC damage, we found no sex differences in performance on the rewarded alternation task. A short inter-trial interval required rats to employ working memory29,45, a hallmark function of the frontal lobe. Control animals performed very well on this task, reaching maximum performance by the second block of trials on day 1 (Figure 3B). As with any spatial working memory task, the entire fronto-hippocampal circuit is involved, including the hippocampus, which plays a key role in spatial working memory, and damage to it can negatively affect performance on learning, memory and spatial navigation tasks56–59. All spatial working memory tasks likely rely on the use of the hippocampus and mPFC working in conjunction, however, and consistent with this, alcohol-induced damage to the prefrontal cortex has previously been associated with impairments in this spatial working memory task29. Indeed, the task appeared difficult for the binged animals. They showed no improvement across trials on day one, and during the first two days of testing they had overall 20% fewer correct alternations than control rats. Ultimately however, the binged groups did achieve control performance. The mPFC contributes to cognition, motivation and risk-taking behavior26–28, and impairments in any of these could contribute to the decreased performance we observed on the spatial working memory task. Although we cannot completely rule out the possibility that binge alcohol-induced mPFC damage altered risk-taking behavior or motivation, animals were familiarized with the T-maze apparatus prior to the 4-day binge, so it was not a novel environment for them. Moreover, no changes in food-related motivation were noted, as binged and control animals were equally likely to consume the food reward pellets during behavior testing.
Compensatory metabolic changes have been observed in human binge drinkers during cognitive tasks. For example, despite behavioral performance comparable to controls, binge drinkers showed increased brain activity in response to a working memory task33. This suggests that a history of binge alcohol requires the brain to use more energy to perform at baseline levels, indicative of less efficient cognitive processing. Therefore, despite the similar performance between control animals and binged on the last day of rewarded alternation testing, we reasoned that binged animals might show more neuronal activation, which we assessed by quantifying c-Fos+ cells. Binged rats had more c-Fos+ cells in the mPFC in response to rewarded alternation testing. This suggests that even in the absence of detectable cognitive deficits or grey matter loss, persistent changes in brain efficiency can still occur as a result of binge alcohol. It is important to note that alcohol withdrawal has also been shown to induce neural activation60,61, which may have contributed to the observed c-Fos activation in the mPFC of binged animals during behavioral testing. However, this is unlikely, as these studies showed that Fos activity was increased early (7–24 hours) after withdrawal, and in the current study we assessed c-Fos activation 7 days after the end of withdrawal.
A possible reason that we did not find sex differences in the present study is that female vulnerability to alcohol may be brain-region specific. To illustrate, a sex difference in alcohol-induced hippocampal damage has been reported5, but a recent study of pontocerebellar volume in male and female alcoholics showed none14. Moreover, although the frontal cortex is an area commonly found to be damaged by excessive alcohol consumption59,62–64, it is possible that sex-specific vulnerability is more prominent in the white matter of this area of the cortex. It would be advantageous for future studies to examine both gray and white matter following alcohol exposure in order to develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the female and male brains differ in reaction to alcohol.
5.0 Conclusions
The results of this study indicate that binge ethanol caused a temporary volume decrease in the nuclei of neurons in the mPFC of both male and female rats, which disappeared with abstinence. Additionally, binged animals of both sexes showed transient deficits in spatial working memory. Although they ultimately achieved control performance levels, binged animals of both sexes showed increased task-induced neuronal activation, suggesting decreased efficiency. Thus, our results show frontal cortex susceptibility to alcohol damage in both sexes, but indicate that sex differences in alcohol vulnerability may be brain region-specific.
Highlights.
Binge ethanol induces temporary volume loss in prefrontal cortex neuronal nuclei
Binge ethanol impairs spatial working memory and decreases task-induced neuronal efficiency
The effects of binge ethanol on prefrontal neurons and rewarded alternation are not sexdependent
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Caleb Robinson for constructing the T-maze.
Funding: This study was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism R21 AA 021260.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Rehm J. The risks associated with alcohol use and alcoholism. Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34:135–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lim SS, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 10th Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and Health; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 4.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Alcohol: A Women’s Health Issue. https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/brochurewomen/Woman_English.pdf.
- 5.Agartz I, Shoaf S, Rawlings RR, Momenan R, Hommer DW. CSF monoamine metabolites and MRI brain volumes in alcohol dependence. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2003;122:21–35. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4927(02)00084-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hommer D, et al. Decreased corpus callosum size among alcoholic women. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:359–63. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550040099019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hommer DW, Momenan R, Kaiser E, Rawlings RR. Evidence for a Gender-Related Effect of Alcoholism on Brain Volumes. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:198–204. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leasure JL, Nixon K. Exercise neuroprotection in a rat model of binge alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34:404–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01105.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mann K, Batra A, Günthner A, Schroth G. Do women develop alcoholic brain damage more readily than men? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:1052–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb00698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maynard ME, Leasure JL. Exercise Enhances Hippocampal Recovery following Binge Ethanol Exposure. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alfonso-Loeches S, Pascual M, Guerri C. Gender differences in alcohol-induced neurotoxicity and brain damage. Toxicology. 2013;311:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilhelm CJ, et al. Astrocyte Dysfunction Induced by Alcohol in Females but Not Males. Brain Pathol. 2016;26:433–451. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Demirakca T, et al. Effects of Alcoholism and Continued Abstinence on Brain Volumes in Both Genders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:1678–1685. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sullivan EV, Rohlfing T, Pfefferbaum A. Pontocerebellar volume deficits and ataxia in alcoholic men and women: no evidence for ‘telescoping’. Psychopharmacology. 2010:279–290. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1729-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maynard ME, Barton EA, Robinson CR, Wooden JI, Leasure JL. Sex differences in hippocampal damage, cognitive impairment, and trophic factor expression in an animal model of an alcohol use disorder. Brain Struct Funct. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1482-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kubota M, et al. Alcohol consumption and frontal lobe shrinkage: study of 1432 non-alcoholic subjects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:104–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nakamura-Palacios EM, et al. Gray Matter Volume in Left Rostral Middle Frontal and Left Cerebellar Cortices Predicts Frontal Executive Performance in Alcoholic Subjects. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38:1126–1133. doi: 10.1111/acer.12308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rando K, et al. Association of Frontal and Posterior Cortical Gray Matter Volume With Time to Alcohol Relapse: A Prospective Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:183–192. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Eijk J, et al. Rapid Partial Regeneration of Brain Volume During the First 14 Days of Abstinence from Alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.O’Neill J, Cardenas VA, Meyerhoff DJ. Effects of Abstinence on the Brain: Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging in Chronic Alcohol Abuse. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25:1673–1682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koss WA, Sadowski RN, Sherrill LK, Gulley JM, Juraska JM. Effects of ethanol during adolescence on the number of neurons and glia in the medial prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala of adult male and female rats. Brain Res. 2012;1466:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freeman SH, et al. Preservation of Neuronal Number Despite Age-Related Cortical Brain Atrophy in Elderly Subjects Without Alzheimer Disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008;67:1205–1212. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818fc72f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wilson EB. The Cell in Development and Heredity. The Macmillan Company; 1925. The karyoplasmic ratio; pp. 727–733. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Looper J. Cytoplasmic fusion in Actinophrys sol, with special reference to the karyoplasmic ratio. J Exp Zool. 1928;50:31–49. [Google Scholar]
- 25.CAVALIER-SMITH T. Economy, Speed and Size Matter: Evolutionary Forces Driving Nuclear Genome Miniaturization and Expansion. Ann Bot. 2005;95:147–175. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Buchsbaum MS. Frontal Cortex Function. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:2178–2178. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kolb B. Functions of the Frontal Cortex of the Rat: A Comparative Review. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(84)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Craik FIM, Levine B. Mind and the frontal lobes: cognition, behavior, and brain imaging. Oxford University Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vargas WM, Bengston L, Gilpin NW, Whitcomb BW, Richardson HN. Alcohol binge drinking during adolescence or dependence during adulthood reduces prefrontal myelin in male rats. J Neurosci. 2014;34:14777–82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3189-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Leary MC, Saver JL. Annual incidence of first silent stroke in the United States: a preliminary estimate. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16:280–5. doi: 10.1159/000071128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Herderscheê D, et al. Silent stroke in patients with transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group. Stroke. 1992;23 doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.9.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shultz S, MacFabe D, Foley K, Taylor R, DPC Sub-concussive brain injury in the Long-Evans rat induces acute neuroinflammation in the absence of behavioral impairments. Behav Brain Res. 2012;229:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Campanella S, et al. Increased Cortical Activity in Binge Drinkers during Working Memory Task: A Preliminary Assessment through a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Molnar S, et al. Behavioral and Brain Activity Indices of Cognitive Control Deficits in Binge Drinkers. Brain Sci. 2018;8:9. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kashfi K, et al. Spatial Attention in Binge-Drinking and Moderate-Drinking College Students: An fMRI Investigation. Alcohol Treat Q. 2017;35:260–278. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nussbaumer D, Grabner RH, Stern E. Neural efficiency in working memory tasks: The impact of task demand. Intelligence. 2015;50:196–208. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Haier RJ, et al. Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study. Brain Res. 1992;570:134–143. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90573-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Majchrowicz E. Induction of physical dependence upon ethanol and the associated behavioral changes in rats. Psychopharmacologia. 1975;43:245–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00429258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nixon K, Crews FT. Binge ethanol exposure decreases neurogenesis in adult rat hippocampus. J Neurochem. 2002;83:1087–93. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nixon K, Crews FT. Temporally Specific Burst in Cell Proliferation Increases Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Protracted Abstinence from Alcohol. J Neurosci. 2004;24:9714–9722. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Knapp DJ, Crews FT. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in brain during acute and chronic ethanol treatment and ethanol withdrawal. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999;23:633–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Roberts AJ, Smith AD, Weiss F, Rivier C, Koob GF. Estrous Cycle Effects on Operant Responding for Ethanol in Female Rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22:1564–1569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ford MM, Eldridge JC, Samson HH. Microanalysis of Ethanol Self-Administration: Estrous Cycle Phase-Related Changes in Consumption Patterns. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:635–643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Penland S, Hoplight B, Obernier J, Crews FT. Effects of nicotine on ethanol dependence and brain damage. Alcohol. 2001;24:45–54. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(01)00142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Deacon RMJ, Rawlins JNP. T-maze alternation in the rodent. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:7–12. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cholvin T, et al. Dorsal hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex each contribute to the retrieval of a recent spatial memory in rats. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221:91–102. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0894-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press; 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mumenthaler MS, Taylor JL, O’Hara R, Yesavage JA. Gender differences in moderate drinking effects. Alcohol Res Health. 1999;23:55–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Erol A, Karpyak VM. Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: Contemporary knowledge and future research considerations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Smith WB, Weisner C. Women and Alcohol Problems: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Unanswered Questions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24:1320–1321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Walter H, Dvorak A, Gutierrez K, Zitterl W, Lesch OM. Gender differences: does alcohol affect females more than males? Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2005;7:78–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Retson TA, Reyes BA, Van Bockstaele EJ. Chronic alcohol exposure differentially affects activation of female locus coeruleus neurons and the subcellular distribution of corticotropin releasing factor receptors. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry. 2015;56:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Obernier JA, Bouldin TW, Crews FT. Binge ethanol exposure in adult rats causes necrotic cell death. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:547–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bonde C, Noraberg J, Zimmer J. Nuclear shrinkage and other markers of neuronal cell death after oxygen-glucose deprivation in rat hippocampal slice cultures. Neurosci Lett. 2002;327:49–52. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00382-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dove AW. Death and the shrinking nucleus. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:1185.2–1185. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Beatty W, Hames K, Blanco C, Nixon S, Tivis L. Visuospatial perception, construction and memory in alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1996;136 doi: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Crews FT, et al. Alcohol-induced neurodegeneration: when, where and why? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28:350–64. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000113416.65546.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pitel AL, et al. Changes in the Episodic Memory and Executive Functions of Abstinent and Relapsed Alcoholics Over a 6-Month Period. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33:490–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Townshend JM, Duka T. Binge Drinking, Cognitive Performance and Mood in a Population of Young Social Drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29:317–325. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000156453.05028.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kozell LB, Hitzemann R, Buck KJ. Acute Alcohol Withdrawal is Associated with c-Fos Expression in the Basal Ganglia and Associated Circuitry: C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Inbred Mouse Strain Analyses. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29:1939–1948. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187592.57853.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.George O, et al. Recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex neurons during alcohol withdrawal predicts cognitive impairment and excessive alcohol drinking. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:18156–18161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116523109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schweinsburg BC, et al. Effects of Alcoholism and Gender on Brain Metabolism. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1180–1183. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Duka T, et al. Consequences of multiple withdrawals from alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28:233–46. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000113780.41701.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Weissenborn R, Duka T. Acute alcohol effects on cognitive function in social drinkers: their relationship to drinking habits. Psychopharmacology. 2003:306–312. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1281-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





