Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2018 Feb 21;97(4):925–939.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.025

Ultra-slow single vessel BOLD and CBV-based fMRI spatiotemporal dynamics and their correlation with neuronal intracellular calcium signals

Yi He 1,2, Maosen Wang 1,2, Xuming Chen 1,2, Rolf Pohmann 1, Jonathan R Polimeni 3, Klaus Scheffler 1,6, Bruce R Rosen 3, David Kleinfeld 4,5, Xin Yu 1
PMCID: PMC5845844  NIHMSID: NIHMS947303  PMID: 29398359

Summary

Functional MRI has been used to map brain activity and functional connectivity based on the strength and temporal coherence of neurovascular-coupled hemodynamic signals. Here, single-vessel fMRI reveals vessel-specific correlation patterns in both rodents and humans. In anesthetized rats, fluctuations in the vessel-specific fMRI signal are correlated with the intracellular calcium signal measured in neighboring neurons. Further, the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal from individual venules and the cerebral-blood-volume signal from individual arterioles show correlations at ultra-slow (< 0.1 Hz), anesthetic-modulated rhythms. These data support a model that links neuronal activity to intrinsic oscillations in the cerebral vasculature, with a spatial correlation length of ~2 mm for arterioles. In complementary data from awake human subjects, the BOLD signal is spatially correlated among sulcus veins and specified intracortical veins of the visual cortex at similar ultra-slow rhythms. These data supports the use of fMRI to resolve functional connectivity at the level of single vessels.

eTOC Blurb

He et al. performed single-vessel fMRI in rat to map spatiotemporal correlations of ultraslow arteriole CBV and venule BOLD fluctuations, concurrent with intracellular-calcium photometry. They find a 2 mm correlation length, which bears on the resolution of functional connectivity.

INTRODUCTION

The cerebral vasculature is an interconnected network that supplies metabolites to the brain and mediates chemical signaling between the brain and the body. Cerebral circulation is mediated by an electrogenic vascular system, composed of interconnected endothelial cells that transmit signals between neighboring vessels to control the tone of arteriole smooth muscle (Aydin et al., 1991; Longden et al., 2017) in addition to forming the lumen of the vessels. The vascular system exhibits a number of rhythms of neurological and vascular origin (Obrig et al., 2000; Tak et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2015). Respiratory- and cardiac-based rhythmic components can be regressed out of the fMRI data. Yet an ultra-low frequency (0.1 Hz) fluctuation in the diameter of arterioles, known as vasomotion (Intaglietta, 1990) (review in vascular medicine), remain. Far from a confounding factor (Murphy et al., 2013), these fluctuations form the basis of resting-state fMRI (Biswal et al., 1995b; Fox and Raichle, 2007). Critically, vasomotion has been shown to be entrained by similarly ultra-slow oscillations in neuronal signaling (Mateo et al., 2017). It has been hypothesized that these covaried vasomotion and oscillatory neuronal patterns may contribute to the physiological basis of the resting-state fMRI connectivity mapping. This would provide the underpinning to observations of concurrent ultra-slow neuronal and hemodynamic signals, acquired optically (Du et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2016; Schulz et al., 2012) and electrophysiologically (Scholvinck et al., 2010; Shmuel and Leopold, 2008).

It is an open challenge to merge the optically acquired neuronal and vessel-specific hemodynamic signaling events with fMRI recordings to directly interpret the vascular basis of the resting-state fMRI signal (Logothetis et al., 2001). In most past work, the resting-state fMRI signal is acquired from large brain voxels (He et al., 2008; Scholvinck et al., 2010; Shmuel and Leopold, 2008). However, more recently high-resolution fMRI has allowed us to map vessel-specific hemodynamic signal from distinct vessel-dominated versus parenchyma-dominated voxels enriched with capillaries in animal brains with either cerebral blood volume (CBV) fMRI or BOLD fMRI (Moon et al., 2013; Poplawsky et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2012). Using line-scanning fMRI methods, the iron oxide particle-based CBV-weighted signal is localized at penetrating arterioles (Yu et al., 2016) while the BOLD signal is detected at penetrating venules (Mansfield et al., 1976; Silva and Koretsky, 2002; Yu et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2014). Thus, the high-resolution fMRI will permit us to follow neurovascular-coupled hemodynamic signals as they propagate from the arteriolar network, e.g., in terms of a CBV-weighted signal that will be sensitive to changes in vascular diameter, to the venous network, e.g., in terms of the BOLD signal, to gain a vascular-specific view of hemodynamic signaling with fMRI.

The technical goal of this work is twofold. First, to detect the vessel-specific fluctuations in fMRI signals during the resting state. This must be accomplished across a plane through cortex with sufficient speed to accurately determine the magnitude and phase of correlation is vasomotor fluctuations across vessels. Second, to measure these fluctuations concurrent with calcium signal recordings from neighboring neurons. Our approach builds on our ability to identify brain arterioles from venules with MRI and our line-scanning method to map the single-vessel hemodynamic signal (Yu et al., 2016). This scheme reshuffled the k-space acquisition so that each image was reconstructed from data acquired along the entire experimental time series with a fast sampling rate, but not in real time (Silva and Koretsky, 2002; Yu et al., 2016). Here, we develop a single-vessel resting-state fMRI mapping method to specify the unique temporal dynamic features of neurovascular oscillatory signals, as well as to characterize the spatial distribution of fluctuations in the fMRI signal in both arteriolar and venous networks. We ask: (1) Can the balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) method be used to detect vessel-specific fMRI signal fluctuations during resting state? The bSSFP method has higher SNR per time unit than the line-scanning method and presents less image distortion with reduced extravascular effect than the echo-planar imaging (EPI) method for high-field rat brain fMRI (Scheffler and Lehnhardt, 2003). (2) Can both BOLD and CBV signals be detected at the scale of penetrating vessels, the finest spatial scale within the brain in real time? This has not been feasible for the previously established line-scanning single-vessel fMRI method (Yu et al., 2016). (3) As a means to connect neural activity with hemodynamics, does the neuronal calcium signal at the location of cortical vessels studied with fMRI match all or part of the fMRI signal with the context of low-frequency fluctuations in brain state (Du et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2016; Schulz et al., 2012)? (4) Lastly, can the single-vessel fMRI scheme be extended to map the vessel-specific long-range correlation patterns in the gray matter of the human brain?

RESULTS

Single-vessel mapping of the evoked BOLD and CBV-weighted signal with bSSFP-fMRI

Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) single vessel fMRI was implemented to map the evoked BOLD and CBV-weighted fMRI signal in the forepaw region of primary sensory (S1) cortex rats under α-chloralose anesthesia. Although anesthesia will alter brain rhythms, and lower the ultra-slow fluctuations to below their awake, resting-state value of ~ 0.1 Hz (Chan et al., 2015), the use anesthesia is currently necessary for stability in these initial single-vessel fMRI measurements. Our stimulus was transient electrical stimulation of the forepaw. To acquire a high spatial resolution 2D bSSFP image, each spin echo was acquired every 7.8 ms to shorten the total acquisition time for each 2D image, comprising a 96×128 matrix (FOV, 9.6×12.8 mm) for an in-plane resolution of 100×100 µm, to a TR of 1 s. As described previously (Yu et al., 2016), a multi-gradient-echo (MGE) sequence was used to distinguish among individual arterioles (bright dots, due to the inflow effect) and venules (dark dots, due to fast T2* decay of deoxygenated blood) from the anatomical single-vessel 2D images, i.e., the arteriole-venule (A-V) map (Figure 1A). Further, the sensory evoked single-vessel BOLD and CBV-weighted fMRI signal was detected by the bSSFP single-vessel fMRI before and after iron oxide particle injection. The data of Figure 1B shows that the peak BOLD signals are primarily located at the venule voxels with the time course of the positive BOLD signal from a selected venule (Figure S1). After an injection of iron oxide particles, the bSSFP fMRI signal was acquired in the same 2D slice and shows that the evoked CBV-weighted signal corresponds to a decreased T2*-weighted MR signal (Figure 1C). Note that the T2*-weighted signal drops since activity-evoked vasodilation leads to an increased blood volume with more iron oxide particles in a given voxel, which shortens the magnitude of T2* and diminishes the signal (Belliveau et al., 1991; Mandeville et al., 1998). The peak CBV-weighted signal was mainly located at individual arterioles with the time course of the negative CBV-weighted signal originated from a selected arteriole (Figures 1C and S1). The averaged hemodynamic time courses from regions of interest of venule and arteriole voxels that showed that the positive BOLD signal is much higher in venule than arteriole voxels (Figure 1D). Similarly, the negative CBV-weighted signal is much lower in arteriole than venule voxels (Figure 1D). Interestingly, the CBV-weighted signal in arteriole voxels returned to baseline faster than that in venules. An extended temporal response for the CBV-weighted signal in venules has been previously reported for CBV-based fMRI studies (Drew et al., 2011; Mandeville et al., 1999; Silva et al., 2007) and may be inferred from and optical imaging (Drew et al., 2011). These results demonstrates the feasibility of bSSFP-fMRI for real-time single-vessel hemodynamic mapping from arterioles. They complement the venule-dominated approach for the positive BOLD signal mainly in terms of oxy/deoxy-hemoglobin ratio changes.

Figure 1. Balanced Steady-State Free Precession (bSSFP)-based task-related single-vessel BOLD/CBV fMRI.

Figure 1

(A) An A-V map shows individual venules (dark dots, blue markers) and arterioles (bright dots, red markers) in a 2D slice. (B) The BOLD fMRI map (left panel) and the semi-transparent map overlaid on the A-V map demonstrates the venule-dominated peak BOLD signal with the on/off block time series from a single venule ROI. (C) The CBV fMRI map (left panel) and the semi-transparent map overlaid on the A-V map show the arteriole-dominated peak CBV signal with the on/off block time series from a single arteriole ROI. (D) The averaged BOLD (left)/CBV(right) fMRI response function from venule (blue) and arteriole (red) voxels (n = 5 rats, mean ± s.e.m).

Single-vessel bSSFP fMRI mapping the resting-state BOLD and CBV-weighted signals

Moving beyond the evoked single-vessel fMRI mapping, the ultra-slow resting state hemodynamic signal was directly mapped with the bSSFP single-vessel fMRI method. Individual arterioles or venules identified from the A-V map were selected as seed voxels to calculate the correlation maps of both BOLD and CBV-based fluctuations in the fMRI signal (Figure 2); the frequency range was 0.01 to 0.1 Hz. As shown in the example data Figure 2B, venule voxels were highly correlated to each other but less correlated for arterioles in the resting-state BOLD correlation maps (Movie S1). In contrast, as shown in the example data of Figure 2C, arteriole voxels were highly correlated but venules essentially uncorrelated in the resting-state CBV-weighted correlation maps (Movie S2). The power spectral density shows that the venule-specific BOLD and arteriole-specific CBV-weighted fMRI signal fluctuate within the ultra-slow frequency range of 0.01 to 0.04 Hz (Figure 2D). Similar to the evoked fMRI maps, the significant BOLD signal correlations were primarily located at venule voxels, i.e., the venule-specific connectivity map, and the significant CBV-weighted signal correlation were primarily located at arteriole voxels, i.e., the arteriole-specific connectivity map, during the resting state.

Figure 2. Using bSSFP-based rs-fMRI to map vascular-specific correlation patterns.

Figure 2

(A) The A-V map shows individual penetrating arterioles and venules (blue arrowheads, venules; red arrowheads, arterioles). (B) The seed-based BOLD rs-fMRI correlation maps (0.01 – 0.1 Hz; seeds: cyan crosshairs) of two venule seeds (V1 and V2; left panel) and CBV rs-fMRI correlation maps (0.01 – 0.1 Hz; seeds: cyan crosshairs) of two arteriole seeds (A1 and A2; right panel). The lower panel is the BOLD signal time course of the two venule seed ROIs and two arteriole seed ROIs. (C) The seed-based CBV rs-fMRI correlation maps (0.01 – 0.1 Hz; seeds: cyan crosshairs) of two venule seeds (V1 and V2; left panel) and CBV rs-fMRI correlation maps (0.01 – 0.1 Hz; seeds: cyan crosshairs) of two arteriole seeds (A1 and A2; right panel). The lower panel is the CBV signal time course of the two venule seed ROIs and two arteriole seed ROIs. (D) The PSD of the venule and arteriole-specific resting-state BOLD (upper panel) and CBV (lower panel) fMRI time courses.

To better characterize the spatial and temporal features of the single-vessel fMRI fluctuations, the vessels identified in the A-V map were paired to calculate correlation coefficients (Figure 3A). First, the values of the correlation coefficient for all vessel pairs (arteriole pairs: A-A; venule pairs: V-V) were plotted as the function of inter-vessel distance. For the BOLD signal fluctuation, V-V pairs show a stronger correlation than that of A-A pairs in the large field-of-view, up to 5×5 mm. This highlights the large-scale extent of the BOLD-based venule functional connectivity (Figure 3B,F). In contrast to the case for BOLD, a stronger correlation was detected for the A-A pairs than the V-V pairs for the CBV-weighted signal fluctuations. These correlations diminished over a vessel separation distance of 2 mm (Figure 3C,G). This spatial scale is consistent with the scale for correlations in vasomotion across arterioles, as detected by two-photon imaging of vessel diameter (Mateo et al., 2017). This spatial scale also corresponds to the ~2 mm electrotonic length for conduction through endothelial cells (Segal and Duling, 1989). The color-coded correlation matrices showed higher BOLD values of correlation in V-V pairs than the other pairs (Figure 3D) and higher CBV-weighted values of correlation in A-A pairs than the other pairs (Figure 3E), which is quantitatively represented as the function of vessel pair distance (Figures 3F,G).

Figure 3. Vascular dynamic network connectivity in rats (14.1T).

Figure 3

(A) The A-V map of one representative rat (arteriole ROIs in red and venule ROIs in blue). (B–C) Scatter plots of the correlation coefficient (CC) of BOLD (B) and CBV (C) fMRI from venule-to-venule (V-V) pairs, arteriole-to-arteriole (A-A) pairs as the function of the inter-vessel distance from one representative rat. (D–E) The correlation matrices of all vessel pairs for the BOLD (D) and CBV (E) fMRI from one representative rat. (F–G) The mean CC value of the BOLD signal from the venule pairs is significantly higher than that of the arteriole pairs with large spatial inter-vessel distance (> 5 mm) (F, n = 5 rats, mean ± s.e.m, *, paired t-test, p < 0.03). In contrast, the mean CC value of the CBV signal from the arteriole pairs is significantly higher than that of the venule pairs with small spatial inter-vessel distance (~ 2 mm). (G, n = 5 rats, mean ± s.e.m, *, paired t-test, p < 0.03). (H–I) The averaged coherence graph of paired venules and arterioles from BOLD/CBV fMRI (H, BOLD fMRI, n = 5 rats, I, CBV fMRI, n = 5 rats, mean ± s.e.m). (J) The mean BOLD coherence coefficient of the venule pairs is significantly higher than that of arteriole pairs at the low-frequency range (0.01–0.04 Hz). (n=5 rats, paired t-test, **, p = 0.0009). (K) The mean CBV coherence value of paired venules is significantly lower than that of paired arterioles at the low-frequency range (0.01–0.04 Hz) (n = 5 rats, paired t-test, **, p = 0.007).

Next, Spectral coherence analysis from paired venules or arterioles was performed to characterize the full frequency spectrum of the vessel-specific fMRI signal fluctuation during the resting state. The coherent oscillation was mainly distributed in the 0.01 – 0.04 Hz frequency range for both BOLD and CBV-weighted fMRI signal fluctuation (Figures 3H,I, similar to the spectral power, Figure 2D). Quantitative analysis demonstrates that the coherence coefficient of venule pairs is significantly higher than that of arteriole pairs for the BOLD signal fluctuation. In contrast, for the CBV-weighted signal fluctuation, the coherence coefficient of arteriole pairs is significantly higher than that of venule pairs for the 0.01–0.04 Hz frequency bandwidth (Figure 3J,K). In addition to the seed-based analysis, independent component analysis (ICA) was used to determine the venule-specific dynamic connectivity for BOLD signal fluctuation and the arteriole-specific dynamic connectivity for CBV-weighted signal fluctuation (Figure S2). One component appeared specific for vessel-specific BOLD ultra-slow oscillations and another for CBV-weighted the ultra-slow oscillations (Figure S2F,G). These results confirm distinct vessel-specific correlation patterns for BOLD and CBV-weighted signal fluctuation.

Vessel-specific BOLD correlation maps were detected in rats anesthetized with isoflurane (< 1.2 % (v/v)) (Figure S3). The frequency range of oscillations extended to ~ 0.1 Hz with peak power levels at 0.01 – 0.04 Hz, similar to those observed with rats anesthetized with α-chloralose (Figure 2). This result suggests that while oscillation at frequencies above ~ 0.1 Hz may vary depending on the anesthetized or awake brain state (Du et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2016; Mateo et al., 2017; Obrig et al., 2000), the ultraslow frequencies are fairly stable (< 0.1 Hz) under uniform ventilation. It is noteworthy that blood pressure was acquired simultaneously with fMRI, but no clear ultra-slow frequency fluctuation was observed from either of the physiological parameters (Figure S4).

Comparison of vessel-specific BOLD and CBV fMRI signals with simultaneous neuronal calcium recording

To characterize the potential neural correlates of the vessel-specific fMRI signal fluctuation, a genetically-encoded calcium indicator, GCaMP6f, was expressed in neurons of forepaw S1 or vibrissa S1 cortex for simultaneous intracellular [Ca2+] recording and fMRI (Figure S5); immunostaining verified the GCaMP expression in cortical neurons (Figure S5B). Evoked and spontaneous intracellular [Ca2+] transients were recorded in the deep layers with fiber photometry concurrent with the local field potential (LFP) (Figures 4A and S5). Evoked [Ca2+] spikes were acquired simultaneously with single-vessel bSSFP-fMRI for comparison with the venule-specific positive BOLD signal and arteriole-specific negative CBV-weighted signal (Figure S6).

Figure 4. Correlation analysis of the single-vessel BOLD/CBV fMRI with GCaMP6f-mediated calcium signal.

Figure 4

(A) The coronal view of the anatomical MR image with the optic fiber targeting the vibrissa S1 (upper panel). The A-V map from a 2D slice covering the deep cortical layer (lower panel). (B) The seed-based BOLD correlation maps from one representative venule voxels (V1) overlaid on the A-V map. (C) The correlation map between the BOLD fMRI signal and the calcium signal (band-pass filter: 0.01 – 0.1 Hz). Inset is a representative color-coded lag time map between the calcium signal with the BOLD fMRI of individual venules (CC > 0.25). (D) The time courses of the BOLD fMRI signal from vessel voxels (V1: blue, solid line; V2: blue, dotted line) and the slow oscillation calcium signal (green). (E) The cross-correlation function of the calcium signal and BOLD fMRI signal of two representative venules (Ca-V1 and Ca-V2) with positive peak coefficients at the lag time 2–3 s. (F) The mean correlation coefficient of the calcium signal with the BOLD fMRI signal of venules is significantly higher than that of arterioles (n = 7 rats, mean ± s.e.m, paired t-test, ***, p = 2.5×10−5). (G) The histogram of venules with lag times varied from 0.5 to 6s (CC > 0.25) and mean lag time at 2.30±0.19 s. (n = 7 rats, mean ± s.e.m). (H) The seed-based correlation maps of CBV fMRI from one arterioles voxel (A1) overlaid on the A-V map (left). (I) The correlation map between the CBV fMRI and calcium signal (band-pass filter: 0.01 – 0.1 Hz), Inset is a representative color-coded lag time map between the calcium signal and the CBV fMRI signal of individual arterioles (CC < −0.25). (J) The time course of the CBV fMRI signal from arteriole voxels (red, solid and dotted lines) and the slow oscillation calcium signal (green). (K) The cross-correlation function of the calcium signal and CBV fMRI signal of two representative arterioles (Ca-A1 and Ca-A2) with negative peak coefficients at the lag time 1–2 s. (L) The mean correlation coefficient of the calcium signal with the CBV fMRI signal of arterioles is significantly higher than that of venules (n = 4 rats, mean ± s.e.m, paired t-test, ***, p = 0.0002). (M) The histogram of arterioles with lag times varied from 0.5 to 5 s (CC < −0.25). The mean lag time is 1.76 ± 0.14 s (n = 4 rats, mean ± s.e.m), which is significantly shorter than the lag times of the calcium and venule BOLD signal (BOLD, n = 7, CBV, n = 4, p = 0.025). (N) The schematic drawing of the spatial and temporal correlation patterns of the slow oscillation signal coupling from neurons to vessels.

The power spectral density shows elevated power at frequencies below 0.1 Hz for the venule BOLD and arteriole CBV-weighted signal, as well as for the simultaneously acquired calcium signal (Figure S7). In contrast, at the deep anesthesia level with α-chloralose, the ultra-slow oscillation pattern was undetectable for both fMRI and changes in [Ca2+] concentration in the same rats (Figure S7), but the evoked BOLD and CBV fMRI signals and changes in [Ca2+] concentration remained (Figure S6). Simultaneous LFP and intracellular [Ca2+] recordings were performed to specify the ultra-slow oscillatory signal at different anesthesia levels. They showed consistent correlation features at the light anesthesia level but not at the deep anesthesia (Figure S8). The ultra-slow oscillatory correlation of the LFP power profile and intracellular [Ca2+] fluctuations were detected in rats anesthetized with 1.2 % (v/v) isoflurane (Figure S9). These results suggest that the neuronal and vascular hemodynamic oscillations are highly correlated in the anesthetized brain and that the correlation is dampened when the neural activity is suppressed with deep anesthesia.

We sought to characterize the potential neuronal origin of the vessel-specific fMRI signal fluctuation. We first considered the correlation between changes in intracellular [Ca2+] in the 0.01 to 0.1 Hz band and the resting-state BOLD signal. It shows vessel-specific positive correlation patterns that are similar to the venule-seed based correlation maps from rats anesthetized with α-chloralose (Figure 4B,C); time courses of representative venules (V1, V2), and changes in intracellular [Ca2+] are shown in Figure 4D. The correlation coefficient between the intracellular [Ca2+] and the venule BOLD signal (Ca2+-V) was significantly higher than that with the arteriole BOLD signal (Ca2+-A) (Figure 4F). Cross-correlation analysis between the changes in intracellular [Ca2+] and the venule-specific BOLD signal showed a positive peak at the averaged lag time of 2.3 ± 0.2 s (Figure 4E,G). The vessels at the cortical surface had the longest lag, up to 3 – 5 s (Figure 4C), which agrees with the lag reported previously by cross-correlation analysis of the calcium signal and hemoglobin-based intrinsic optical signal (Du et al., 2014).

We next considered the correlation of the calcium signal in the 0.01 – 0.1 Hz band with the single vessel CBV-weighted fMRI signal obtained after the injection of iron oxide particles. Similar to the arteriole-seed based CBV correlation maps, the highly correlated voxels with changes in intracellular [Ca2+] were located mainly at arterioles, but with negative values of the correlation coefficient (Figures 4H,I); the time courses of representative arterioles (A1, A2), and the calcium signal are shown in Figure 4J. Quantitative analysis showed that the correlation between the intracellular [Ca2+] and the CBV-weighted signal of arterioles (Ca2+-A) was significantly higher than that of venules (Ca2+-V) (Figure 4I). The oscillation in intracellular [Ca2+] also led the arteriole-specific CBV-weighted signal fluctuations, as observed by the cross-correlations of two representative arterioles as the function of lag time (Figure 4K). Different arterioles showed varied lags with a mean value at 1.8 ± 0.2 s (Figure 4M). Cross-correlation of the intracellular [Ca2+] with the arteriole CBV-weighted signal showed a shorter lag time than that with the venule BOLD signal (Figure 4G,M). Meanwhile, the oscillation in intracellular [Ca2+] was found to be correlated with the CBV-weighted signal of a few venules with lag time of 5 – 10 s (Figure S10). This result indicates the passive venule dilation usually detected as the post-stimulus undershoot of the evoked BOLD signal results from increase blood flow following prolonged stimulation(Buxton et al., 1998; Drew et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2007).

Besides the ultra-slow oscillation, the GCaMP6-mediated calcium signal exhibited EEG-like rhythmic neuronal activity, showing significantly higher spectral power at the 1 – 10 Hz frequency range than that of the fluorescent signal detected from the GFP-expressing cortex of control rats (Figure S11A–C). The spectral power in the 1 – 10 Hz was correlated with the vessel-specific BOLD signal, showing the correlation coefficient of spectral power with the venule BOLD signal is significantly higher than that of the spectral power with the arteriole BOLD signal (Figure S11D–G). This result further demonstrates the neuronal correlates of the vessel-specific fMRI signal fluctuation in the cerebrovascular network. Finally, the cartoon of Figure 4N summarizes the spatial and temporal patterns of neurovascular hemodynamic signal fluctuation from arteriolar to venous networks.

Mapping vascular network connectivity in the human brain under 3T and 9.4T

The single-vessel mapping scheme was implemented to characterize the prospects for vessel-specific fMRI correlation patterns in awake human subjects. Although bSSFP shows great advantage for the high-field fMRI in the rat brain as a consequence of decreased distortion and reduced extravascular effect compared to the EPI method, the single-echo bSSFP method acquires single k-space line per echo and takes longer time than the EPI method to acquire multi-slice high-resolution images (Budde et al., 2014). We established single-vessel fMRI human brain mapping with the EPI method. First, the fMRI signal of sulcus veins in the occipital lobe was mapped using EPI-fMRI at 3 T. Upon the checkerboard visual stimulation, the evoked BOLD signal was located primarily at venous voxels with a sparsely distributed patchy pattern that was previously reported (Menon et al., 1993) (Figure 5A–C and Movie S3). Besides the task-related functional maps, the seed-based correlation maps from resting-state fMRI demonstrated vein-dominated correlation spatial patterns (Figure 5D,F,G; Movie S4). The coherence analysis of paired venous voxels showed coherent ultra-slow oscillation of the awake human subjects up to ~ 0.1 Hz (Figure 5H), which was much higher than the oscillation frequency detected in anesthetized rats (Figure 3H). The correlation coefficients of paired venous voxels were plotted as the function of the intra-hemispheric and inter-hemispheric vessel distances (Figure 5I). The values of the correlation decreased as the function of the intra-hemispheric vessel distance but showed significantly higher values for the inter-hemispheric venous voxel pairs (Figure 5J), similar to previously established spatial vasomotion correlation patterns in awake mice (Mateo et al., 2017). The low-frequency oscillation around 0.1 Hz has been previously reported in the visual cortex of the human brain with conventional resting state fMRI method (Mitra et al., 1997). Also, when EPI images were spatially smoothed with different kernels from 1 to 5 mm, the vessel-specific spatial patterns merged to functional blobs similar to the conventional functional connectivity maps (Biswal et al., 1995a; Smith et al., 2009) (Figure 5,I).

Figure 5. The task-related and resting state single vessel fMRI mapping in awake human subjects (3T).

Figure 5

(A) A sagittal view of the human brain with a 2D EPI slice located in the occipital lobe. (B) An averaged EPI image shows the pial veins in sulci as dark dots. (C) The checkerboard visual stimulation-evoked BOLD functional map with peak BOLD signals located at pial veins. (D) The seed-based BOLD correlation maps (0.01–0.1Hz; seeds: two veins (V1 and V2)) demonstrate vessel-dominated patterns. (E) The magnified view of the averaged EPI image from one representative subject (vein ROIs, left hemisphere, blue, right hemisphere, cyan). (F–G) The time courses of two veins in the task related (F) and resting state (G) (0.01 – 0.1 Hz) conditions. (H) The coherence graph of paired veins exhibits coherent oscillation at the frequency range of 0.01 – 0.1 Hz significantly higher than the higher frequency range (0.1 – 0.2 Hz; n = 6 subjects, mean± s.e.m, **, paired t-test, p = 0.008). (I) The scatter plot of the correlation coefficient (CC) from intra-and inter-hemispheric vein pairs. (J) The mean CC of inter-hemispheric vein pairs with the inter-vessel distance between 5 – 8 cm is significantly higher than that of intra-hemispheric vein pairs with distance between 3 – 3.5 cm.(***, n = 6 subjects, mean± s.e.m, t-test, p = 0.0002) (K–L) The evoked functional (K) and resting-state correlation (L) maps were smoothed from 1 mm to 5 mm (FWHM).

The seed-based analysis was performed before and after the regression of respiration and heartbeat relevant temporal artifacts (Figure S12), showing the little difference in the vessel-specific spatial patterns (Figure S13). In addition, ICA analysis specified the highly correlated venous voxels at multiple slices, showing a 3D vascular dynamic correlation structure through the main branches of cerebral vasculature (Figure S14, Movie S5). These results demonstrate that the hemodynamic fMRI signals from central veins through sulci or at the gyrus surface are highly correlated, representing large-scale vascular dynamic network connectivity detectable with the 3-T MR scanner.

To characterize the hemodynamic signal fluctuation in vessels penetrating cortical gray matter, we mapped the single vessel-based resting-state fMRI signal at 9.4 T. The multiple 2D EPI images were acquired with an in-plane resolution of 500×500 µm2 and 800 µm thickness at a TR of 1 s. In parallel, a single-vessel A-V map was acquired to better characterize the location of individual sulcus arteries and veins, as well as a few intracortical veins (Figure 6A–C). Similarly, the BOLD signal was highly correlated on venous voxels, but not on artery voxels (Figure 6D,E). In the enlarged correlation maps, a few intracortical veins penetrating the gray matter could be spotted on the A-V map, given their unique vascular orientation through the 2D slice, showing a strong correlation to each other (Figures 6B,C and S15). Furthermore, coherence analysis of paired veins showed a coherent frequency range less than ~0.1 Hz, which is consistent with previous brain ultra-slow oscillation studies (Obrig et al., 2000) (Figure 6G). This result provides a good example for the illustration of vascular correlation of the selected intracortical veins penetrating cortical gray matter at 9.4 T. This result shows the translational potential of high-resolution single-vessel fMRI to associate anatomical vascular biomarkers with prognostic dynamic indicators of neurovascular disease and vascular dementia in the brain.

Figure 6. The intracortical vascular dynamic mapping with 9.4 T.

Figure 6

(A) The A-V map is acquired from a 2D slice across the occipital lobe. (B–C) The intra-cortical veins (arrows) in the magnified view of region 1 and region 2 in the A-V map (left panel). The right panel shows the correlation map based on the selected seeds (the intra-cortical veins: blue arrows) with highly correlated voxels detected on the other intracortical veins (white arrows) in the gray matter. (D–E) The seed-based correlation maps with Vein 1 (V1), Artery 1 (A1) as seeds, respectively (seeds: cyan crosshairs). (F) The coherence graph of paired veins (blue) and arteries (red) identified by the A-V map demonstrates the slow fluctuations from 0.01 to 0.1 Hz. (G) The mean coherence coefficients of the paired veins are significantly higher than that of the paired arteries at low frequency (0.01 – 0.1 Hz)(n = 6 subjects, mean± s.e.m, paired t-test, **, p = 0.0009).

DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated that a single-vessel fMRI mapping scheme reveals the spatial and temporal features of vessel-to-vessel hemodynamic correlations in anesthetized rats (Figure 1) and in awake human subjects (Figure 5). With regard to rats, BOLD-specific venous signals and the CBV-specific arteriolar signals evolve at ultra-slow time-scales, with frequency components between 0.01 and 0.04 Hz (Figure 3). Both signals show a causal relationship to the simultaneously acquired calcium signal (Figure 4). With regard to humans, the ultra-slow oscillation was observed in the BOLD signal for frequencies up to 0.1 Hz and vessel-to-vessel correlations are strong (Figure 6). This work demonstrates the feasibility to apply a multi-modal fMRI platform to measure the neuronal correlates of resting state hemodynamic signal fluctuation from arteriolar to venous networks at the scale of individual vessels.

Technical Advances

The attainment of single-vessel imaging with high SNR was achieved based on three factors: a high magnetic field to enhance the transverse signal; a bSSFP sequence with high SNR efficiency per time unit; and a small radio frequency coil with appropriate sample loading to optimize the detection from local cortical regions. These factors ensured that the temporal fluctuation of the vessel-specific fMRI signal was not dominated by machine-based technical noise, but rather represented the physiological state of the brain. This issue was further verified by the anesthetic dose-dependent study, which indicated that the vessel-specific fMRI signal fluctuation could be dampened even though the SNR remained unchanged (Figure S7). Besides the technical noise, artifacts from physiological motion can be erroneously intrinsically linked to the functional connectivity (Hu et al., 1995; Murphy et al., 2013). Numerous strategies have been developed to regress out the potential artifacts, or identify the functional node-specific component using ICA analysis (Glover et al., 2000; McKeown et al., 2003). Nonetheless, a lack of standard criteria to distinguish the contribution from brain signal fluctuation versus physiological motion artifacts limits the reliability of functional connectivity. We nominally expect that the pattern of correlations should be insensitive to global motion artifacts. Further, the enhanced correlations in the BOLD response for pairs of veins versus arterioles (Figures 3F,H and J and 6F) and the enhanced correlations in the CBV response for arterioles versus venules (Figures 3G,I and K) as a function of frequency are highly unlikely to result from known artifacts.

The detected bSSFP signal change is a mixture of intravascular and extravascular contributions. The intravascular signal is given by the steady state contrast of passband bSSFP, which is proportional to √ (T2/T1) (Scheffler and Lehnhardt, 2003). Given the high spatial resolution of the bSSFP fMRI imaging, the BOLD contrast from venules and the CBV-based contrast from arterioles of vessel voxels remained highly T2-weighted because of the fast T2 decay of deoxygenated venule blood and iron oxide enriched arteriole blood (Blockley et al., 2008; Lee et al., 1999). The extravascular contribution depends on the vessel size. As for spin echoes, the rapid refocusing in bSSFP produces dynamic averaging that reduces the extravascular effects of the cortical penetrating vessels larger than 10 – 20 µm (Bieri and Scheffler, 2007; Scheffler and Ehses, 2016; Zur et al., 1988). Therefore, the observed signal changes with high spatial resolution bSSFP were mainly intravascular. It is noteworthy that the blood flow could contribute to the BOLD fMRI signal fluctuation based on the in-flow effect, given the short TR of the bSSFP sequence at a given flip angle (Kim et al., 1994). This is especially true for arterioles. However, the BOLD signal fluctuation in arterioles showed significantly lower correlation than that of venules, indicating that the in-flow effect is not the primary contributor to the vascular dynamic correlation patterns (Figures 2 and 3).

BOLD Versus CBV-Weighted fMRI Signals

In contrast to the venus BOLD signal, for the CBV signal fluctuation, the arteriole-dominated CBV-signal results from vasomotor fluctuations in vessel diameter. The vasomotion signal shows ultra-slow oscillation with a broader frequency band centered at 0.1 Hz in the anesthetized rat brain (Kleinfeld et al., 1998; Mayhew et al., 1996) and 0.1 Hz in awake mice (Drew et al., 2010; Mateo et al., 2017). Although in the present study arteriole CBV signal fluctuations were detected at a frequency band of < 0.04 Hz in α-chloralose anesthetized rats, it is likely that this hemodynamic signal corresponds to vasomotion. Further to this point, beyond the neuronal effects of anesthetics (Brown et al., 2011), anesthetics may directly affect vasomotion and directly contribute to the temporal dynamic patterns detected by fMRI in anesthetized animals (Colantuoni et al., 1984; Hundley et al., 1988). In addition, future studies will compare the arteriole-specific fMRI signal fluctuation in rat under anesthesia and wakefulness to specify the dynamic patterns driven by vasomotion. Lastly, our result is also consistent with the “bagpipe” model of active arteriole dilation with increased neuronal activity, where arteriole dynamics dominate both spontaneous and evoked blood volume changes in the brain (Drew et al., 2011). Following the net increase of the arteriole blood reservoir, venules drain the blood with a delayed passive dilation, which is consistent with undershoot of the evoked BOLD fMRI signal (Mandeville, 2012; Mandeville et al., 1999).

The ultra-slow passive venule dilation was detected by single-vessel CBV-bSSFP fMRI when iron oxide particles were delivered at a lower than normal dosage so that the venule fMRI signal was not completely dampened due to shortened T2* decay (Figure S10). This observation also explains the small number of venules highlighted by the arteriole-seed based CBV correlation maps (Figure 2C), which showed much longer lag time than arterioles when analyzing the simultaneously acquired calcium ultra-slow oscillation signal via cross-correlation (Figure S10). All told, single-vessel bSSFP-fMRI detects distinct spatial and temporal patterns of vessel-specific dynamic connectivity in the anesthetized rat brain.

Correlates of Neuronal [Ca2+] and Single-Vessel fMRI

A key observation was the correlation of ultra-slow calcium oscillation with single-vessel fMRI signal fluctuation. Prior combined fMRI and electrophysiological studies show that the resting-state BOLD signal correlates with neuronal activity oscillation (He et al., 2008; Pan et al., 2013; Scholvinck et al., 2010; Shmuel and Leopold, 2008). The present study extends the spatial resolution of resting-state fMRI down to single vessels. The coherence of the ultra-slow oscillations from both intracellular [Ca2+] and vessel-specific fMRI signals demonstrates a potential link of the two events, with the calcium event leading the vascular fluctuation (Figure 4E,K). In particular, the BOLD signal from individual venules and the CBV-weighted signal detected primarily from arterioles showed varied lag times, ranging from 0.5 to 6 s, relative to the calcium signal (Figure 4G,M).

Previous studies reported only long, i.e., 5 to 6 s lag times by cross-correlation of the change in γ-band power and the resting-state BOLD signal (Scholvinck et al., 2010). This long lag time could be caused by signal fluctuations in large voxels, with primary weighting on surface draining veins. In the present study, the fMRI signal from draining veins also showed longer lag time, which is consistent with the lag time between the calcium and hemoglobin signal oscillation (~ 0.1 Hz) detected from the cortical surface (Du et al., 2014). In contrast to surface draining veins, penetrating vessels at the deep cortical layers showed shorter lag times of 1.8 ± 0.2 s for the arteriole CBV signal and 2.3 ± 0.2 s for the venule BOLD signal (Figure 4), which is in coincordance with the signaling order of arteriole dilation followed by oxygen saturation changes in venules for neurovascular coupling (Devor et al., 2003; Iadecola, 2004).

The arterio-venous (A-V) transit time of the resting-state hemodynamic signal was calculated based on the cross-correlation lag times of the BOLD and CBV-weighted signals to the simultaneously recorded calcium signal (Figure S16 and Table S1). The resting-state A-V transit time of 0.61 s at the deep cortical layers is slighter shorter than the transit time of 0.8 – 1.2 s, calculated by the time to half-maximal, t1/2, from surface arterioles to venules (Hutchinson et al., 2006). This further supports the vessel-specific hemodynamic signal propagation. Lastly, cortical calcium waves have been observed in the newborn and adult rodent brain (Adelsberger et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2016) and can propagate through the cortex at a fast speed (Stroh et al., 2013). It will be interesting to determine if these drive propagating vascular events.

Single Vessel Human Maps

Vascular dynamic network connectivity was directly mapped in awake human subjects to demonstrate the translational potential of single-vessel fMRI mapping. The vessel-specific ultra-slow oscillation shares a similar frequency range to that of the long-distance functional nodes detected by conventional resting-state fMRI, as well as the spontaneous oscillation of the cerebral hemodynamic signal detected by near-infrared spectroscopy (Obrig et al., 2000). In addition, the smoothed single-vessel correlation maps represented similar functional connectivity maps in the visual area as detected by the conventional resting-state fMRI (Smith et al., 2009) (Figure 5I). Together with the rat data that show highly correlated calcium and single-vessel fMRI signal fluctuation, the vascular dynamic network connectivity could represent the hemodynamic vascular correlation coupled to neuronal signal oscillation in both anesthetized and awake conditions. Interestingly, a recent resting-state fMRI study showed that the connectivity strength of a given voxel among the "default mode" and other networks is inversely proportional to its vascular volume fraction (Tak et al., 2015). This observation indicates that functional connectivity of long-range nodes in the brain may be driven independently of the vascular-specific hemodynamic fluctuation. Given the highly correlated calcium signal to the hemodynamic signal fluctuation, one possible explanation for this discrepancy is that vascular dynamic network connectivity represents the whole brain state fluctuation with less region specificity (Chang et al., 2016), but the functional connectivity may specify the network pattern of long-distance functional nodes (Biswal et al., 1995a; Smith et al., 2009). Alternatively, because the vascular volume fraction was calculated from the largest extracerebral vessels detected by MRI images, it is also possible that the reduced connectivity may be caused by the low SNR of voxels occupied by these extracerebral vessels.

Given the cerebral folds and fissures of the human brain, single-vessel EPI-fMRI mapping mainly detects the central pial veins through the sulci with diameters of a few hundred micrometers based on the T2*-weighted partial volume effect. Single-vessel fMRI with 9.4 T at high spatial resolution. i.e., 500 × 500 × 800 µm3, showed the correlation patterns of the intracortical penetrating veins in the human brain (Duvernoy et al., 1981) (Figure 6). In contrast to studies focusing on excluding the venous BOLD signal to improve spatial specificity for brain function and connectivity mapping (Barth and Norris, 2007; Curtis et al., 2014; Kalcher et al., 2015; Menon, 2002; Menon et al., 1993), this work specifies the vascular network connectivity in gray matter of the human brain with the potential clinical application of illustrating hemodynamic features of vascular dementia (Iadecola, 2013; O'Brien et al., 2003; Roman, 2003). Specifically, the neural correlates of the vascular dynamic network connectivity detected in the rodent brain display great potential for clinical applications such as the diagnosis of cognitive impairments in patients with cerebral small vessel diseases or degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (Schaefer et al., 2014). The ability to specify the direct linkage of vascular pathology to dysfunction of the neurovascular network remains elusive (Stevens et al., 2014). The ability to map the hemodynamic origin of the BOLD signal from anatomically distinguishable vessels in human gray matter provides a key step to link vascular biomarkers, e.g., microbleeds (Poels et al., 2012; Wardlaw et al., 2013) or cortical microinfarcts (van Rooden et al., 2014; van Veluw et al., 2014; van Veluw et al., 2013), with dynamic indicators in patients with small vessel or Alzheimer’s disease.

Caveats Going Forward

We developed the single-vessel fMRI resting-state mapping scheme to characterize the spatial and temporal hemodynamic signals in arteriolar and venous networks, concurrent with photometric calcium recording. The high field MRI scanner, 14 T for animals and 9.4 T for humans, achieves sufficient SNR and high BOLD contrast for high-resolution fMRI imaging. A redesign of the radio frequency detection coil will be needed to extend the single-vessel fMRI method to broader application with lower magnetic field scanners. Toward this goal, a super-conducting coil has been developed to boost the SNR of MRI images (Ratering et al., 2008). Also, instead of the current 32-or 64-channel coils for human brain imaging, region-specific array coils can be developed to cover focal cortical areas with optimized geometry to increase the SNR. This step will help further resolve individual intracortical vessels in gray matter of normal human subjects as well as patients with neurovascular dysfunction due to vascular dementia.

Supplementary Material

Supplement

Highlights.

  1. bSSFP-based single-vessel fMRI reveals dynamic vascular network connectivity.

  2. Arterioles and venules showed distinct patterns of spatiotemporal correlations.

  3. Neural Ca2+ ultra-slow oscillations correlate to vessel-specific fMRI fluctuations.

  4. Human brain fMRI signal fluctuations were mapped in individual gray matter veins.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by DFG SPP-1655 and internal funding from Max Planck Society for X.Y. and NIH grants R35NS097265 for D.K. and NIMH BRAIN grant R01MH111438 for D.K. and B.R. We thank Dr. H. Merkle and Dr. K. Buckenmaier for technical support, Ms. H. Schulz and Ms. S. Fischer for animal maintenance support, the AFNI team for the software support, and Dr. L. Looger and the Janelia Research Campus of HHMI for kindly providing viral vectors.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

XY, DK and BR designed the research, YH, XY, MW and XC performed animal experiments, YH, XY and RP acquired data, YH analyzed data, KS, RP, JR and MW provided key technical support, and XY, DK and YH wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Adelsberger H, Garaschuk O, Konnerth A. Cortical calcium waves in resting newborn mice. Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8:988–990. doi: 10.1038/nn1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aydin F, Rosenblum WI, Povlishock JT. Myoendothelial junctions in human brain arterioles. Stroke. 1991;22:1592–1597. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.12.1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barth M, Norris DG. Very high-resolution three-dimensional functional MRI of the human visual cortex with elimination of large venous vessels. NMR in Biomedicine. 2007;20:477–484. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN, Jr, McKinstry RC, Buchbinder BR, Weisskoff RM, Cohen MS, Vevea JM, Brady TJ, Rosen BR. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1991;254:716–719. doi: 10.1126/science.1948051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bieri O, Scheffler K. Effect of diffusion in inhomogeneous magnetic fields on balanced steady-state free precession. NMR in Biomedicine. 2007;20:1–10. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1995a;34:537–541. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Biswal B, Zerrin Yetkin F, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar mri. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1995b;34:537–541. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blockley NP, Jiang L, Gardener AG, Ludman CN, Francis ST, Gowland PA. Field strength dependence of R1 and R2* relaxivities of human whole blood to ProHance, Vasovist, and deoxyhemoglobin. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:1313–1320. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown EN, Purdon PL, Van Dort CJ. General anesthesia and altered states of arousal: a systems neuroscience analysis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:601–628. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Budde J, Shajan G, Zaitsev M, Scheffler K, Pohmann R. Functional MRI in human subjects with gradient-echo and spin-echo EPI at 9.4 T. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2014;71:209–218. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buxton RB, Wong EC, Frank LR. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1998;39:855–864. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan AW, Mohajerani MH, LeDue JM, Wang YT, Murphy TH. Mesoscale infraslow spontaneous membrane potential fluctuations recapitulate high-frequency activity cortical motifs. Nature Communications. 2015;6(7738) doi: 10.1038/ncomms8738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang C, Leopold DA, Scholvinck ML, Mandelkow H, Picchioni D, Liu X, Ye FQ, Turchi JN, Duyn JH. Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113:4518–4523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520613113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colantuoni A, Bertuglia S, Intaglietta M. Effects of anesthesia on the spontaneous activity of the microvasculature. International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental / sponsored by the European Society for Microcirculation. 1984;3:13–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Curtis AT, Hutchison RM, Menon RS. Phase based venous suppression in resting-state BOLD GE-fMRI. NeuroImage. 2014;100:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Devor A, Dunn AK, Andermann ML, Ulbert I, Boas DA, Dale AM. Coupling of total hemoglobin concentration, oxygenation, and neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron. 2003;39:353–359. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00403-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Drew PJ, Shih AY, Driscoll JD, Knutsen PM, Blinder P, Davalos D, Akassoglou K, Tsai PS, Kleinfeld D. Chronic optical access through a polished and reinforced thinned skull. Nature Methods. 2010;7:981–984. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Drew PJ, Shih AY, Kleinfeld D. Fluctuating and sensory-induced vasodynamics in rodent cortex extend arteriole capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:8473–8478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100428108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Du C, Volkow ND, Koretsky AP, Pan Y. Low-frequency calcium oscillations accompany deoxyhemoglobin oscillations in rat somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E4677–4686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410800111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duvernoy HM, Delon S, Vannson JL. Cortical blood vessels of the human brain. Brain Research Bulletin. 1981;7:519–579. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(81)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2007;8:700–711. doi: 10.1038/nrn2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2000;44:162–167. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<162::aid-mrm23>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. He BJ, Snyder AZ, Zempel JM, Smyth MD, Raichle ME. Electrophysiological correlates of the brain's intrinsic large-scale functional architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:16039–16044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu X, Le TH, Parrish T, Erhard P. Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1995;34:201–212. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hundley WG, Renaldo GJ, Levasseur JE, Kontos HA. Vasomotion in cerebral microcirculation of awake rabbits. The American journal of physiology. 1988;254:H67–71. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1988.254.1.H67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hutchinson EB, Stefanovic B, Koretsky AP, Silva AC. Spatial flow-volume dissociation of the cerebral microcirculatory response to mild hypercapnia. NeuroImage. 2006;32:520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Iadecola C. Neurovascular regulation in the normal brain and in Alzheimer's disease. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2004;5:347–360. doi: 10.1038/nrn1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Iadecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron. 2013;80:844–866. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Intaglietta M. Vasomotion and flowmotion: physiological mechanisms and clinical evidence. Vascular Medicine Review. 1990:101–112. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalcher K, Boubela RN, Huf W, Nasel C, Moser E. Identification of Voxels Confounded by Venous Signals Using Resting-State fMRI Functional Connectivity Graph Community Identification. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2015;9:472. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim SG, Hendrich K, Hu X, Merkle H, Ugurbil K. Potential pitfalls of functional MRI using conventional gradient-recalled echo techniques. NMR in Biomedicine. 1994;7:69–74. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1940070111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kleinfeld D, Mitra PP, Helmchen F, Denk W. Fluctuations and stimulus-induced changes in blood flow observed in individual capillaries in layers 2 through 4 of rat neocortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:15741–15746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee SP, Silva AC, Ugurbil K, Kim SG. Diffusion-weighted spin-echo fMRI at 9.4 T: microvascular/tissue contribution to BOLD signal changes. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1999;42:919–928. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199911)42:5<919::aid-mrm12>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001;412:150–157. doi: 10.1038/35084005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Longden TA, Dabertrand F, Koide M, Gonzales AL, Tykocki NR, Brayden JE, Hill-Eubanks D, Nelson MT. Capillary K+-sensing initiates retrograde hyperpolarization to increase local cerebral blood flow. Nature Neuroscience. 2017;20:717–726. doi: 10.1038/nn.4533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ma Y, Shaik MA, Kozberg MG, Kim SH, Portes JP, Timerman D, Hillman EM. Resting-state hemodynamics are spatiotemporally coupled to synchronized and symmetric neural activity in excitatory neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113:E8463–E8471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525369113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mandeville JB. IRON fMRI measurements of CBV and implications for BOLD signal. NeuroImage. 2012;62:1000–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Ayata C, Zaharchuk G, Moskowitz MA, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. Evidence of a cerebrovascular postarteriole windkessel with delayed compliance. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 1999;19:679–689. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199906000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Kosofsky BE, Keltner JR, Weissleder R, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. Dynamic functional imaging of relative cerebral blood volume during rat forepaw stimulation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1998;39:615–624. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910390415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mansfield P, Maudsley AA, Baines T. Fast Scan Proton Density Imaging by Nmr. J Phys E Sci Instrum. 1976;9:271–278. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mateo C, Knutsen PM, Tsai PS, Shih AY, Kleinfeld D. Physiological basis of blood oxygen level dependent "resting state" connectivity across cortex. Neuron. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.012. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mayhew JE, Askew S, Zheng Y, Porrill J, Westby GW, Redgrave P, Rector DM, Harper RM. Cerebral vasomotion: a 0.1-Hz oscillation in reflected light imaging of neural activity. NeuroImage. 1996;4:183–193. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McKeown MJ, Hansen LK, Sejnowsk TJ. Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:620–629. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2003.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Menon RS. Postacquisition suppression of large-vessel BOLD signals in high-resolution fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1–9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Menon RS, Ogawa S, Tank DW, Ugurbil K. Tesla gradient recalled echo characteristics of photic stimulation-induced signal changes in the human primary visual cortex. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1993;30:380–386. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mitra PP, Ogawa S, Hu X, Ugurbil K. The nature of spatiotemporal changes in cerebral hemodynamics as manifested in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1997;37:511–518. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910370407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moon CH, Fukuda M, Kim SG. Spatiotemporal characteristics and vascular sources of neural-specific and -nonspecific fMRI signals at submillimeter columnar resolution. NeuroImage. 2013;64:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Murphy K, Birn RM, Bandettini PA. Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. NeuroImage. 2013;80:349–359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. O'Brien JT, Erkinjuntti T, Reisberg B, Roman G, Sawada T, Pantoni L, Bowler JV, Ballard C, DeCarli C, Gorelick PB, et al. Vascular cognitive impairment. The Lancet Neurology. 2003;2:89–98. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00305-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Obrig H, Neufang M, Wenzel R, Kohl M, Steinbrink J, Einhaupl K, Villringer A. Spontaneous low frequency oscillations of cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism in human adults. Neuroimage. 2000;12:623–639. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pan WJ, Thompson GJ, Magnuson ME, Jaeger D, Keilholz S. Infraslow LFP correlates to resting-state fMRI BOLD signals. NeuroImage. 2013;74:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Poels MM, Ikram MA, van der Lugt A, Hofman A, Niessen WJ, Krestin GP, Breteler MM, Vernooij MW. Cerebral microbleeds are associated with worse cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Neurology. 2012;78:326–333. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182452928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Poplawsky AJ, Fukuda M, Kang BM, Kim JH, Suh M, Kim SG. Dominance of layer-specific microvessel dilation in contrast-enhanced high-resolution fMRI: Comparison between hemodynamic spread and vascular architecture with CLARITY. NeuroImage. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ratering D, Baltes C, Nordmeyer-Massner J, Marek D, Rudin M. Performance of a 200-MHz cryogenic RF probe designed for MRI and MRS of the murine brain. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2008;59:1440–1447. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Roman G. Vascular dementia: a historical background. International psychogeriatrics / IPA. 2003;15(Suppl 1):11–13. doi: 10.1017/S1041610203008901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schaefer A, Quinque EM, Kipping JA, Arelin K, Roggenhofer E, Frisch S, Villringer A, Mueller K, Schroeter ML. Early small vessel disease affects frontoparietal and cerebellar hubs in close correlation with clinical symptoms--a resting-state fMRI study. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2014;34:1091–1095. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Scheffler K, Ehses P. High-resolution mapping of neuronal activation with balanced SSFP at 9.4 tesla. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2016;76:163–171. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. European Radiology. 2003;13:2409–2418. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1957-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Scholvinck ML, Maier A, Ye FQ, Duyn JH, Leopold DA. Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:10238–10243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913110107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schulz K, Sydekum E, Krueppel R, Engelbrecht CJ, Schlegel F, Schroter A, Rudin M, Helmchen F. Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and fiber-optic calcium recording in rat neocortex. Nature Methods. 2012;9:597–602. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Segal SS, Duling BR. Conduction of vasomotor responses in arterioles: a role for cell-to-cell coupling? The American Journal of Physiology. 1989;256:H838–845. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.256.3.H838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shmuel A, Leopold DA. Neuronal correlates of spontaneous fluctuations in fMRI signals in monkey visual cortex: Implications for functional connectivity at rest. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008;29:751–761. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Silva AC, Koretsky AP. Laminar specificity of functional MRI onset times during somatosensory stimulation in rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15182–15187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222561899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Silva AC, Koretsky AP, Duyn JH. Functional MRI impulse response for BOLD and CBV contrast in rat somatosensory cortex. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2007;57:1110–1118. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, Filippini N, Watkins KE, Toro R, Laird AR, Beckmann CF. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:13040–13045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905267106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Stevens RD, Hannawi Y, Sair H. Small vessel disease and the resting functional architecture of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2014;34:1089–1090. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Stroh A, Adelsberger H, Groh A, Ruhlmann C, Fischer S, Schierloh A, Deisseroth K, Konnerth A. Making waves: initiation and propagation of corticothalamic Ca2+ waves in vivo. Neuron. 2013;77:1136–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Tak S, Polimeni JR, Wang DJ, Yan L, Chen JJ. Associations of resting-state fMRI functional connectivity with flow-BOLD coupling and regional vasculature. Brain Connectivity. 2015;5:137–146. doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. van Rooden S, Goos JD, van Opstal AM, Versluis MJ, Webb AG, Blauw GJ, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, van Buchem MA, van der Grond J. Increased number of microinfarcts in Alzheimer disease at 7-T MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;270:205–211. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. van Veluw SJ, Heringa SM, Kuijf HJ, Koek HL, Luijten PR, Biessels GJ Utrecht Vascular Cognitive Impairment study g. Cerebral cortical microinfarcts at 7Tesla MRI in patients with early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39:163–167. doi: 10.3233/JAD-131040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. van Veluw SJ, Zwanenburg JJ, Engelen-Lee J, Spliet WG, Hendrikse J, Luijten PR, Biessels GJ. In vivo detection of cerebral cortical microinfarcts with high-resolution 7T MRI. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2013;33:322–329. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, Lindley RI, O'Brien JT, Barkhof F, Benavente OR, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:822–838. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yu X, Glen D, Wang S, Dodd S, Hirano Y, Saad Z, Reynolds R, Silva AC, Koretsky AP. Direct imaging of macrovascular and microvascular contributions to BOLD fMRI in layers IV-V of the rat whisker-barrel cortex. NeuroImage. 2012;59:1451–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Yu X, He Y, Wang M, Merkle H, Dodd SJ, Silva AC, Koretsky AP. Sensory and optogenetically driven single-vessel fMRI. Nat Methods. 2016;13:337–340. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Yu X, Qian C, Chen DY, Dodd SJ, Koretsky AP. Deciphering laminar-specific neural inputs with line-scanning fMRI. Nat Methods. 2014;11:55–58. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhu DC, Tarumi T, Khan MA, Zhang R. Vascular coupling in resting-state fMRI: evidence from multiple modalities. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2015;35:1910–1920. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zur Y, Stokar S, Bendel P. An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady-state transverse magnetization refocusing. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1988;6:175–193. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910060206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement

RESOURCES