Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2018 Mar 10;273:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.12.029

High-efficiency transduction of spinal cord motor neurons by intrauterine delivery of integration-deficient lentiviral vectors

Sherif G Ahmed a,b, Simon N Waddington c,d, Maria Gabriela Boza-Morán a, Rafael J Yáñez-Muñoz a,
PMCID: PMC5845930  PMID: 29289570

Abstract

Integration-deficient lentiviral vectors (IDLVs) are promising gene delivery tools that retain the high transduction efficiency of standard lentiviral vectors, yet fail to integrate as proviruses and are instead converted into episomal circles. These episomes are metabolically stable and support long-term expression of transgenes in non-dividing cells, exhibiting a decreased risk of insertional mutagenesis. We have embarked on an extensive study to compare the transduction efficiency of IDLVs pseudotyped with different envelopes (vesicular stomatitis, Rabies, Mokola and Ross River viral envelopes) and self-complementary adeno-associated viral vectors, serotype-9 (scAAV-9) in spinal cord tissues after intraspinal injection of mouse embryos (E16). Our results indicate that IDLVs can transduce motor neurons (MNs) at extremely high efficiency regardless of the envelope pseudotype while scAAV9 mediates gene delivery to ~ 40% of spinal cord motor neurons, with other non-neuronal cells also transduced. Long-term expression studies revealed stable gene expression at 7 months post-injection. Taken together, the results of this study indicate that IDLVs may be efficient tools for in utero cord transduction in therapeutic strategies such as for treatment of inherited early childhood neurodegenerative diseases.

Keywords: Integration-deficient lentiviral vectors (IDLV), Spinal cord, In utero gene delivery, Pseudotyping

Graphical abstract

Image 1

1. Introduction

A key factor in the success of gene therapy is the development of delivery systems that are capable of efficient gene transfer without causing pathogenic effects. Lentiviral vectors, engineered forms of retroviruses from the genus Lentivirus, are promising tools for gene therapy because they transduce dividing and quiescent cells efficiently, their tropism can be changed by replacing the natural envelope of lentiviruses with a heterologous envelope (referred to as pseudotyping) and they lead to strong and long-lasting expression of transgenes [1]. However, during the transduction process lentiviral vectors integrate their genome in the host cell DNA, which can lead to insertional mutagenesis. Retroviral vector-mediated insertional mutagenesis has become clinically relevant, having led to several cases of T-cell leukemia in the clinical trials of gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1) and chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) [2], [3]. Albeit lower, some risk of insertional mutagenesis is also present using integrating lentiviral vectors [4]. Engineering of self-inactivating (SIN) lentiviral vectors by deletion of the U3 region in the 3′-LTR is considered to minimize the probability of interactions between the transfer vector elements and the host genome and consequently the incidence of insertional mutagenesis-related events in transduced cells [5]. The non-transcribing LTR in these vectors is not able to drive the expression of cellular oncogenes that might be present in the vicinity of the integration site [6], [7], [8]. Studies with SIN lentiviral vectors containing enhancer-less internal promoters resulted in safety improvements in different preclinical studies [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

The use of integration-deficient lentiviral vectors (IDLVs) is another strategy that may overcome the insertional mutagenesis risks. These vectors have been developed by introducing class I mutations, which impair the catalytic activity of integrase but do not affect the amount of vector DNA produced, into the integrase gene [14]. Failing integration, the viral DNA of these mutants is converted into episomal circles by nuclear enzymes. The viral episomes are diluted out in proliferating tissues while they are retained and metabolically stable in quiescent cells. Therefore, IDLVs could be an ideal delivery vector for transduction of post-mitotic central nervous system (CNS) cells such as neurons. Yáñez-Muñoz et al. demonstrated that HIV-1-based IDLVs produced with a D64V integrase mutation efficiently transduced ocular and brain tissues in rodents, in addition to exhibiting an expression level of eGFP in the eye comparable with vectors containing wild-type integrase [15], [16]. Gene delivery and expression in striatum using similar IDLVs but with the 262RRK to AAH integrase mutation were demonstrated by Philippe et al. [17]. Rahim et al. showed that IDLVs resulted in efficient long-term expression in the CNS following in utero delivery [18]. More recently, Peluffo et al. explored in vivo transduction of spinal cord by IDLVs in adult rodents. In both mice and rats, intraparenchymal injection of IDLV-eGFP in the ventral horn of the spinal cord led to significant transduction of motor neurons (MNs) around the injection site [19]. IDLVs expressing glial derived neurotrophic factor have been also shown to induce neuroprotection in a rat model of Parkinson's disease [20].

The CNS can be affected by a number of genetic diseases that start developing before birth [21]. In such cases, in utero gene transfer seems a promising technology. Widespread gene delivery to the nervous system is feasible using fetal delivery and may offer several advantages [22], [23]. Firstly, the relatively smaller size of the fetus allows exposure of wider areas to the high concentration of vector that may be required for therapeutic effect. Secondly, a fetal therapy approach may prevent, reverse or ameliorate the onset of pathological changes that could be irreversible later in development. Thirdly, because of the immature immune system and unlikely exposure to the archetypal viruses from which viral vectors have been developed, fetal delivery may lead to immune tolerance to injected viral vector and the transgenic product, unlike in the adults [24].

Here we demonstrate that intrauterine injection of various pseudotyped IDLVs achieves efficient and persistent gene expression in motor neurons within the mouse spinal cord. We also show that IDLVs produce better and more selective transduction of motor neurons in comparison to scAAV9, which displayed significant non-neuronal transduction. These promising results could guide the choice of vector to be applied for in utero delivery, depending on the transduction pattern most likely to result in therapeutic benefit.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Production of IDLVs

Third-generation self-inactivating HIV-1-based vectors were produced by transient co-transfection of four plasmids in human embryonic kidney 293 T cells as previously described [25]. The transfer plasmid was pRRLsin_PPT_CMV_GFPpre, a self-inactivating lentiviral construct containing a CMV promoter driving eGFP expression, followed by the Woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element (WPRE) [26]. The packaging plasmids were pRSV-rev and pMDLg/pRREintD64V [27]. Vectors were pseudotyped with either vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein (VSV-G; plasmid pMD2.G), rabies virus envelope glycoprotein (plasmid pHCMV.rabiesG, kindly provided by M Sena-Esteves, University of Massachusetts), Ross-River virus envelope (plasmid pRRV_ENV, kind gift of C. Lundberg, Lund University) or Mokola virus envelope (plasmid pHCMV-Mokola-G, from M. Sena-Esteves). Vectors were concentrated by ultracentrifugation and titrated as described [28].

2.2. AAV production

Recombinant self-complementary AAV vectors of capsid serotype 9 (scAAV9) were produced using a triple-transfection calcium phosphate method in HEK293 cells. Plasmids p5E18-VD2/9 (packaging plasmid), pAdDeltaF6 (adenovirus helper plasmid) and transfer plasmid pscAAVCAGeGFP (encoding eGFP driven by the cytomegalovirus enhancer/chicken beta actin CAG promoter) were used to generate scAAV9.CAG.GFP. At 72 h post transfection, cell cultures were centrifuged and vector in the supernatant was recovered by over-night precipitation. The precipitated supernatant and cell pellet resuspended in lysis buffer were mixed and subjected to three freeze/thaw cycles for 10 min at 37 °C and then 30 min at − 80 °C. Benzonase was added at a final concentration of 50 U/ml, incubating for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by 25 min centrifugation at 3360 × g at RT and further filtration through a 0.45 μm pore size filter. The clarified lysate was loaded onto a modified discontinuous iodixanol gradient followed by column chromatography. Purified vectors were titrated by estimating number of genome copies (GC) by quantitative PCR and dot-blot [29].

2.3. In utero injections and histology

All animal procedures were carried out under the provisions of the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Pregnant CD1 mice at 16 days gestation were used. Intrauterine surgery was performed as previously described [18]. Under isoflurane anaesthesia, the uteri were exposed through a midline laparotomy. Trans-uterine injections of IDLVs with 2.03E + 09 GC/ml and scAAV9 with 6.42E + 10 GC/ml into the spinal cord (2 μl), the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle on the left side of the brain (5 μl) or the superficial temporal vein (20 μl) of the fetuses were given using a 34-gauge needle (Hamilton UK). All the fetuses were injected. The laparotomy was repaired in two stages using interrupted 6-0 silk sutures. Dams were allowed to recover in a warm cage. Mice were euthanized at the indicated times post-injection with isofluorane overdose and spinal cords were removed and placed in PBS for visualizing eGFP fluorescence microscopically. Given the intensity of eGFP fluorescence achieved, cords were occasionally discarded as injection fails at this stage if no fluorescence was observed; this technical failure rate was estimated at around 25%. The cords were then immersed in 4% PFA overnight for fixation. They were subsequently transferred to 20% sucrose for 24–48 h for cryoprotection, embedded in OCT medium and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Twenty-micrometer coronal sections were cut on a cryostat, mounted on Super Frost slides (BDH) and stored at − 80 °C for subsequent analysis.

2.4. Immunohistochemistry

Cryosection slides were removed from storage at − 80 °C and left at RT for 5 min to air dry. The slides were washed in 1 × PBS for 5 min three times, and permeabilized with 1 × PBS with 0.05% (v/v) Tween for 10 min. They were incubated with 2% bovine serum albumin for 1 h to block non-specific binding, washed with 1 × PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody diluted in PBS. The slides were washed 3 times for 5 min with PBS and incubated for 1 h with secondary antibody conjugated with fluourochrome, diluted in 1 × PBS. The sections were washed 3 times for 5 min in 1 × PBS and mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (VectorLabs) for nuclear staining. They were stored at 4 °C or examined directly under a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, UK). Primary antibodies: goat anti-ChAT (Millipore, UK, 1:50, Cat. AB144P), mouse anti-NeuN (Millipore, UK 1:500, Cat. MAB377), rabbit anti-GFAP (DAKO, UK, 1:500, Cat. Z033429-2), rabbit anti-IBA-1 (WAKO, Osaka, Japan; Cat. 019–19,741, 1:1000), mouse anti-APC (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany; Cat. OP80 Ab-7, 1:500), rabbit anti-eGFP (Invitrogen, UK, 1:1000, Cat. A-11122) and mouse anti-eGFP (UC Davis/NINDS NeuroLab Facility, clone N86/38, 1:1000) were used. Donkey anti goat Alexa 555 (Invitrogen, UK, 1:1000, Cat. A-21432), goat anti mouse Alexa 555 (Invitrogen, UK, 1:1000, Cat. A-21424), goat anti rabbit Alexa 555 (Invitrogen, UK, 1:1000, Cat. A32732) and goat anti rabbit Alexa 488 (Invitrogen, UK, 1:1000, Cat. A-11034) were used as secondary antibodies.

2.5. Cell counts

Coronal spinal cord sections showing the entire ventral horn at the relevant level were processed for double immunohistochemistry for eGFP and ChAT, NeuN or GFAP and analyzed with 20 × and 40 × magnification using a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, UK) for accurate cell-type identification. For this, the spinal cord was divided into cervical, thoracic and lumbar segments, based on the vertebral levels. Segments were processed into 20 micrometer-thick sections and these were stored, to carry out assessments of gene expression. Approximately 36 sections per segment per animal were processed for immunohistochemistry. Approximately 1 in every 6 consecutive sections was analyzed for each cell type marker. Images were captured and used for manual quantification of percentages of in vivo neuronal transduction. The percent of eGFP-positive motor neurons or neurons was averaged for each segment. Three mice were analyzed per vector injected (N = 3).

2.6. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism software. Means were represented with s.e.m. One-way analysis of variance was used to assess for significant differences among groups. Student's t-tests were performed to compare P10 versus 7 months post-injection using a 95% confidence level.

3. Results

3.1. Optimisation of the route of injection

A pilot experiment was performed to identify the optimal fetal route of injection for gene delivery to the spinal cord. IDLVs carrying eGFP under transcriptional control of the CMV promoter were produced using either VSV-G or Rabies envelope proteins. These were injected into E16 fetal mice by intraspinal, intracranial, or intravascular routes. Tissues were harvested ten days after birth (P10). Intraspinal injection showed robust eGFP fluorescence along the entire spinal cord, with expression additionally observed in spinal ganglia; IDLV-Rabies also produced GFP fluorescence in the intercostal nerves (data not shown). Under UV illumination eGFP expression was sufficiently strong to be visible to the naked eye in whole dissected spinal cords. Intracranial injection resulted in expression which was restricted to the brain. Intravenous injection resulted in eGFP expression only in the liver. IDLV-VSV-G showed stronger eGFP expression than IDLV-Rabies in the brain and liver after intracranial and intravascular injection respectively. Intraspinal injection of both IDLV-VSV-G and IDLV-Rabies showed similar intensity of eGFP expression (Fig. 1). It was therefore concluded that intraspinal injections, through which the entire cord is bathed in vector solution at the time of injection, were most appropriate for cord transduction.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Strong eGFP expression after in utero injection with IDLV-VSV-G and IDLV-Rabies. eGFP expression is mostly localised to the tissues where the viral vectors were injected. Intracranial and intraspinal injection of either viral vector showed localised eGFP expression in the brain (a, d) and spinal cord (b, e), respectively. Intravascular injection showed eGFP expression in the liver, particularly for the IDLV-VSV-G (c) but not so much for the rabies pseudotyped IDLV (f). Lack of eGFP fluorescence in uninjected and DMEM-injected cords is demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 4a and b, respectively.

A more detailed assessment of transduction by IDLVs containing CMV-eGFP was carried out with vectors pseudotyped with VSV-G, Rabies, Mokola or Ross River virus envelope proteins. For comparative purposes we also used self-complementary AAV serotype 9 (scAAV9), in which the expression of eGFP was driven by the cytomegalovirus enhancer/chicken beta-actin (CAG) promoter. All viral vectors were injected intraspinally into E16 mice fetuses, and samples harvested at P10.

Widespread eGFP fluorescence was confirmed in whole spinal cord and ganglia of animals injected with IDLVs (Fig. 2a, e, i, m, q). Coronal sections of the cord were analyzed for eGFP fluorescence. The results were similar for all IDLVs regardless of pseudotype, showing significant transduction at cervical, thoracic and lumbar levels (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Broad and efficient transduction of the spinal cord with pseudotyped IDLVs (CMV-eGFP) and scAAV9 (CAG-eGFP) after intraspinal delivery in utero. eGFP expression can be observed in the entire cord of samples harvested at P10 in whole cord (“intact”) and coronal sections at cervical, thoracic and lumbar levels (dorsal region is at the top and ventral region is at the bottom in all coronal sections).

Transduction with scAAV9 also showed extensive transgenic expression in the spinal cord at dissection. When analyzed in coronal sections, eGFP fluorescence in the cord parenchyma seemed more extensive than with IDLVs (Fig. 2r, s, t).

3.2. Neural cell-type-specific transduction with IDLVs

To assess cell-type specificity of transgenic expression after in utero delivery of IDLVs or scAAV9, transduction efficiency in the major cell types in the CNS (motor neurons, neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia) was evaluated histologically. Co-staining for markers of the relevant cell types revealed motor neurons to be the most efficiently and broadly transduced. ChAT-positive motor neurons throughout the entire spinal cord strongly expressed eGFP in mice injected with IDLVs regardless of the type of envelope used; (VSV-G and rabies, Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 1; Mokola and RRV, Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Motor neuron transduction appeared to be complete (Table 1). Dorsal root ganglia neurons also contained a ChAT + population which showed strong and extensive eGFP expression at all levels of the cord. Estimates of transduction of NeuN + neurons across cord segments revealed higher transduction by the rabies pseudotyped IDLV (~ 35%) than VSV-G (~ 15%), RRV (~ 13%) and Mokola IDLVs (~ 11%; Table 1). Co-staining for astrocytes (GFAP +), oligodendrocytes (APC +) or microglia (Iba1 +) did not reveal significant transduction or activation of any of these populations in sections from mice injected with the various IDLVs (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Strong neuronal expression of eGFP after E16 intraspinal IDLV delivery. Transduction of motor neurons and neurons following in utero delivery of the indicated IDLV CMV-eGFP vectors was assessed by co-staining with relevant markers. Extensive transduction of ChAT + motor neurons in the ventral region of coronal cord sections and DRG neuron cell bodies (middle row in all panels) was observed. eGFP expression was also visible in variable levels of NeuN + neurons.

Table 1.

Frequency of transduced cells by cell type, vector, and spinal cord region in samples harvested at P10.

IDLV-CMV-GFP-VSV-G IDLV-CMV-GFP-Rabies IDLV-CMV-GFP-RRV
N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + % N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + % N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + %
Cervical 3 259 259 100 3 234 234 100 3 243 243 100
Thoracic 3 146 146 100 3 151 151 100 3 137 137 100
Lumbar 3 264 264 100 3 223 223 100 3 237 237 100



N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + % N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + % N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + %
Cervical 3 74 463 15.9 ± 6 3 163 455 35.8 ± 3 3 66 477 13.8 ± 4
Thoracic 3 61 441 13.8 ± 5 3 151 413 36.5 ± 4 3 51 411 12.4 ± 3
Lumbar 3 73 487 14.9 ± 6 3 156 447 34.8 ± 7 3 59 461 12.7 ± 4



IDLV-CMV-GFP-Mokola scAAV9-CAG-GFP
N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + % N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + %
Cervical 3 262 262 100 3 97 271 35.7 ± 7
Thoracic 3 133 133 100 3 86 263 32.6 ± 4
Lumbar 3 243 243 100 3 101 266 37.9 ± 4



N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + % N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + %
Cervical 3 46 419 10.9 ± 7 3 69 437 15.7 ± 5
Thoracic 3 43 403 10.6 ± 6 3 55 410 13.4 ± 3
Lumbar 3 51 431 11.8 ± 4 3 67 453 14.7 ± 5

3.3. In utero injection of scAAV9 in the spinal cord shows different tropism

Spinal cords of mice injected with scAAV9 CAG-eGFP showed different vector tropism and transduction efficiency compared to IDLV injections. The number of eGFP + motor neurons was significantly (p < 0.001) lower: an average of 35.4% ChAT + motor neurons showed eGFP fluorescence (Table 1 & Fig. 4a, b, c, m, n, o). NeuN + neurons showed eGFP expression in 14.6% of cases (Table 1 & Fig. 4g, h, i, s, t, u), statistically lower than IDLV-Rabies (p < 0.001). Unlike with IDLVs, GFAP + astrocytes were often transduced with scAAV9 and showed strong eGFP expression (Fig. 4j, k, l, v, w, x). No transduction or activation of Iba1 microglia were observed (Supplementary Fig. 4i, j, k).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Transduction pattern following intrauterine delivery of scAAV9 CAG-eGFP. Cervical and lumbar sections of the harvested P10 cords show partial transduction of ChAT + motor neurons (a, b, c, m, n, o) and DRG neurons (d, e, f, p, q, r), and NeuN + neurons (g, h, i, s, t, u). GFAP + astrocytes often co-localised with eGFP fluorescence (j, k, l, v, w, x).

3.4. Long-term expression from IDLVs and scAAV9

To assess long-term transgene expression after in utero intraspinal injection, mice were treated with VSV-G or rabies-pseudotyped IDLVs, or scAAV9, and euthanised at 7 months. Comparing with the P10 time-point, eGFP expression was stable, with no obvious reduction in the frequency of eGFP + cells over time (Table 2). eGFP expression was again sufficiently strong for fluorescence to be visible to the naked eye in whole dissected cords. The distinct transduction efficiency and tropism of pseudotyped IDLVs and scAAV9 were maintained at P10 and the 7-month time-points (Fig. 5, Fig. 6, and Table 2).

Table 2.

Frequency of transduced cells by cell type, vector, and spinal cord region in samples harvested at postnatal month 7.

IDLV-CMV-GFP-VSV-G IDLV-CMV-GFP-Rabies scAAV9-CAG-GFP
N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + % N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + % N GFP +/ChAT + Total ChAT + %
Cervical 3 243 243 100 3 222 222 100 3 93 266 34.9 ± 7
Thoracic 3 133 133 100 3 131 131 100 3 71 220 32.2 ± 4
Lumbar 3 259 259 100 3 227 227 100 3 107 264 40.5 ± 4



N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + % N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + % N GFP +/NeuN + Total NeuN + %
Cervical 3 63 455 13.8 ± 6 3 166 461 36.1 ± 3 3 67 423 15.8 ± 5
Thoracic 3 71 443 16.1 ± 5 3 148 417 35.4 ± 4 3 49 395 12.4 ± 3
Lumbar 3 83 496 16.7 ± 6 3 149 441 34.7 ± 7 3 77 463 16.6 ± 5

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Immunofluorescence studies confirm long-term motor neuron-specific gene delivery in the spinal cord following in utero treatment with IDLVs. Long-term gene expression was confirmed by eGFP fluorescence and co-staining of sections of spinal cords from mice harvested 7 months after in utero administration of IDLVs pseudotyped with rabies (left panel) or VSV-G (right panel). Strong eGFP expression can be seen on longitudinal sections (a, a′) and along whole cords (b, b′). ChAT + cells show eGFP co-expression in coronal cervical (c, d, e, c′, d′, e′) and lumbar (i, j, k, i′, j′, k′) sections of mice injected with either vector. eGFP co-localization was also observed in some neurons stained with NeuN antibody (f, g, h, l, m, n, f′, g′, h′, l′, m′, n′).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Long-term expression in motor neurons, neurons and astrocytes after E16 intraspinal injection with scAAV9. Longitudinal sections (a) and whole spinal cord (b) demonstrated strong eGFP expression 7 months post-injection. Co-stained sections revealed same transduction pattern as at the P10 time-point. Partial ChAT + motor neuron staining colocalized with eGFP (c, d, e, l, m, n). Limited neuron (f, g, h, o, p, q) and astrocyte (i, j, k, r, s, t) transduction were observed through co-localization of eGFP and NeuN or GFAP.

4. Discussion and conclusion

Delivery of viral vectors to the fetal organs and tissues is an important strategy in studies of diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. From a therapeutic viewpoint, in utero gene therapy is an attractive principle in which fetal delivery of transgenes may prevent the pathology of early-onset diseases, induce tolerance against an expressed therapeutic protein and increase likelihood of widespread transduction [30]. Prenatal gene therapy has been successfully used in a number of animal disease models [31], [32] and may serve as a platform for novel strategies to treat a wide variety of neurological disorders. Lentiviral vectors, with their relatively high payload and ability to transduce quiescent and dividing cell populations, are an important tool among the available vector systems [33].

Targeted delivery and expression of therapeutic genes into specific cell populations is a crucial need in the field of gene therapy, notably in the CNS. The main methods that have been used to achieve cell-type specific lentiviral transduction are: route of delivery, vector pseudotyping, cell-type specific promoters and vector detargeting. Delivery route and timing have been extensively explored both in adults and perinatally with a variety vectors, including standard lentiviral vectors and IDLVs [34]. Pseudotyping lentiviral vectors with different natural envelope glycoproteins has been shown to alter the tropism towards glial or neuronal cells [35]. More recently, engineering of chimeric envelope proteins has allowed lentiviral targeting, including in the CNS [36], [37]. Promoters such as those for enolase and synapsin I have been used for neuronal-specific expression, and the human GFAP promoter for glial-specific expression [38], [39]. Finally, lentiviral vector detargeting using miRNAs has been an effective way to prevent expression of transgenes in specific cell-types [40], including neurons [41].

Based upon preliminary proof-of-concept injections of vector into the spinal cord of fetal mice [34], we have further explored route of delivery and pseudotyping to examine spinal cord transduction and cell-type specificity. A pilot experiment was carried out with the purpose of choosing the best fetal route of injection showing widespread gene delivery in the spinal cord. Intraspinal injection showed robust eGFP expression along the entire spinal cord, while intracranial injection resulted in strong expression in the brain. Intravenous injection showed eGFP expression only in the liver. It has been previously demonstrated that stereotactic injections into adult rat or mouse spinal cord leads to limited spread from the site of injection [19]. However, in the current study widespread transduction of neurons along the entire spinal cord was seen following in utero administration. The volume of vector that was injected is enough to bathe the entire cord at this early stage, which may explain the efficient vector spread. This efficiency also suggests that the spinal pia membrane barrier to transduction observed in adult animal models [42] may not be such an obstacle at E16 in mice.

We evaluated a range of IDLV pseudotypes at the P10 time-point following intraspinal injection at E16: VSV-G, Rabies, RRV and Mokola. Immunostaining of spinal cord sections revealed a similar pattern, with very effective transduction of ChAT-positive motor neurons and DRG neurons, and lesser efficiency of transduction of NeuN neurons (11–36%, with Rabies being most efficient). No eGFP expression in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes or microglia was observed with any of the four vectors tested. Rabies IDLV also showed transduction of intercostal nerves which, together with DRG transduction, has been previously described following intraspinal injection of Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV) vector in fetal mice [18]. Effective and sustained eGFP expression in motor neurons and stable but lower levels of transduction of NeuN neurons were confirmed in mice analyzed 7 months after birth following treatment with VSV-G or Rabies IDLVs, which suggests stability of transgene expression in this model. The reasons for differential transduction proficiency of ChAT versus NeuN cells are currently unclear and may include accessibility at the E16 developmental stage, tropism, transduction efficiency and transgene promoter efficiency.

The transduction efficiency of ChAT-positive cells after intraspinal in utero delivery with IDLVs was remarkable, with apparently nearly all motor neurons (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) and DRG neurons showing eGFP fluorescence. The highest percentage of lower motor neuron transduction previously described in the literature was ~ 60%, with a single dose of AAV9 in P0/P1 mouse neonates [43]. The preferential neuronal tropism of the pseudotyped IDLVs (and standard integrating lentiviral vectors) was also observed in adult mouse and rat cord injections, but in these cases transduction was limited to the area around the injection site, motor neuron transduction levels were lower (up to c. 55% in mouse) and there was transgene expression in some astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [19]. The differences could be partly explained by the developmental stage as at E16 mouse neurogenesis is still on-going and the CNS during this period consists of a mixture of dividing, migrating, differentiating and differentiated neurons [44]. Additionally, there are relatively few astrocytes in the perinatal CNS, as astrogenesis in rodents occurs in the early post-natal period (the first two post-natal weeks) and the astrocytic end-feet are not fully developed [45]. Foust and co-workers demonstrated that AAV9 injection into neonatal mice at P1 mainly mediated neuronal transduction, while injections into adult mice showed more predominant glial transduction, even though this may at least partly depend on vector configuration [46].

Our comparison between IDLVs and scAAV9 showed significant differences in transduction efficiency and cell tropism following the same in utero intraspinal procedure. A number of factors may have had a role here, including differences in vector tropism and the promoter present in each vector (CMV in IDLVs, CAG in scAAV9). Although differences in virus titre are in favour of scAAV9, ChAT-positive neuron transduction was lower in mice injected with this vector, at about ~ 40%. eGFP expression by scAAV9 was also observed in non-neuronal cells such as GFAP-positive astrocytes. However, we did not observe any eGFP expression in oligodendrocytes. Staining of the spinal cord sections with anti-Iba-1 antibody did not reveal microglial activation upon in utero injection of any of the vectors.

In conclusion, in utero delivery of IDLVs represents a promising tool in studies of CNS biology and disease. The selective, extensive and highly efficient transduction of ChAT-positive dorsal root ganglia neurons and motor neurons observed creates opportunities for a number of novel studies. The key features of this approach include the early time point at which genes can be introduced into the nervous system, the selectivity for ChAT-positive cells and the relatively low number of IDLV particles required. Given the importance of motor neurons in neuromuscular disease, these findings may also have therapeutic implications for diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Miguel Sena-Esteves, Cecilia Lundberg and Luigi Naldini for plasmids. R.J.Y.-M. was funded by Genoma España (project GENAME) and The SMA Trust. SNW was funded by the European Research Council grant “Somabio” 260862, by the MRC NC3Rs grant NC/L001780/1 and by MRC grants MR/P026494/1, MR/N026101/1 and MR/019075/1. Sherif Ahmed's scholarship was supported by the Egyptian Cultural and Education Bureau in London, UK and the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Egypt.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.12.029.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (14.5MB, docx)

References

  • 1.Naldini L., Blomer U., Gallay P., Ory D., Mulligan R., Gage F.H., Verma I.M., Trono D. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science. 1996;272:263–267. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5259.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hacein-Bey-Abina S., Von Kalle C., Schmidt M., McCormack M.P., Wulffraat N., Leboulch P., Lim A., Osborne C.S., Pawliuk R., Morillon E., Sorensen R., Forster A., Fraser P., Cohen J.I., de Saint Basile G., Alexander I., Wintergerst U., Frebourg T., Aurias A., Stoppa-Lyonnet D., Romana S., Radford-Weiss I., Gross F., Valensi F., Delabesse E., Macintyre E., Sigaux F., Soulier J., Leiva L.E., Wissler M., Prinz C., Rabbitts T.H., Le Deist F., Fischer A., Cavazzana-Calvo M. LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science. 2003;302:415–419. doi: 10.1126/science.1088547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stein S., Ott M.G., Schultze-Strasser S., Jauch A., Burwinkel B., Kinner A., Schmidt M., Kramer A., Schwable J., Glimm H., Koehl U., Preiss C., Ball C., Martin H., Gohring G., Schwarzwaelder K., Hofmann W.K., Karakaya K., Tchatchou S., Yang R., Reinecke P., Kuhlcke K., Schlegelberger B., Thrasher A.J., Hoelzer D., Seger R., von Kalle C., Grez M. Genomic instability and myelodysplasia with monosomy 7 consequent to EVI1 activation after gene therapy for chronic granulomatous disease. Nat. Med. 2010;16:198–204. doi: 10.1038/nm.2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bokhoven M., Stephen S.L., Knight S., Gevers E.F., Robinson I.C., Takeuchi Y., Collins M.K. Insertional gene activation by lentiviral and gammaretroviral vectors. J. Virol. 2009;83:283–294. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01865-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zufferey R., Dull T., Mandel R.J., Bukovsky A., Quiroz D., Naldini L., Trono D. Self-inactivating lentivirus vector for safe and efficient in vivo gene delivery. J. Virol. 1998;72:9873–9880. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.12.9873-9880.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romano G. Gene transfer in experimental medicine. Drug News Perspect. 2003;16:267–276. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2003.16.5.829314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Romano G. Current development of lentiviral-mediated gene transfer. Drug News Perspect. 2005;18:128–134. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2005.18.2.886481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Romano G., Claudio P.P., Tonini T., Giordano A. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) derived vectors: safety considerations and controversy over therapeutic applications. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2003;13:424–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Almarza E., Zhang F., Santilli G., Blundell M.P., Howe S.J., Thornhill S.I., Bueren J.A., Thrasher A.J. Correction of SCID-X1 using an enhancerless Vav promoter. Hum. Gene Ther. 2011;22:263–270. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gonzalez-Murillo A., Lozano M.L., Alvarez L., Jacome A., Almarza E., Navarro S., Segovia J.C., Hanenberg H., Guenechea G., Bueren J.A., Rio P. Development of lentiviral vectors with optimized transcriptional activity for the gene therapy of patients with Fanconi anemia. Hum. Gene Ther. 2010;21:623–630. doi: 10.1089/hum.2009.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Knight S., Zhang F., Mueller-Kuller U., Bokhoven M., Gupta A., Broughton T., Sha S., Antoniou M.N., Brendel C., Grez M., Thrasher A.J., Collins M., Takeuchi Y. Safer, silencing-resistant lentiviral vectors: optimization of the ubiquitous chromatin-opening element through elimination of aberrant splicing. J. Virol. 2012;86:9088–9095. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00485-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang F., Thornhill S.I., Howe S.J., Ulaganathan M., Schambach A., Sinclair J., Kinnon C., Gaspar H.B., Antoniou M., Thrasher A.J. Lentiviral vectors containing an enhancer-less ubiquitously acting chromatin opening element (UCOE) provide highly reproducible and stable transgene expression in hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2007;110:1448–1457. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-12-060814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou S., Mody D., DeRavin S.S., Hauer J., Lu T., Ma Z., Hacein-Bey Abina S., Gray J.T., Greene M.R., Cavazzana-Calvo M., Malech H.L., Sorrentino B.P. A self-inactivating lentiviral vector for SCID-X1 gene therapy that does not activate LMO2 expression in human T cells. Blood. 2010;116:900–908. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-250209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Engelman A. In vivo analysis of retroviral integrase structure and function. Adv. Virus Res. 1999;52:411–426. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60309-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wanisch K., Yáñez-Muñoz R.J. Integration-deficient lentiviral vectors: a slow coming of age. Mol. Ther. 2009;17:1316–1332. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yáñez-Muñoz R.J., Balaggan K.S., MacNeil A., Howe S.J., Schmidt M., Smith A.J., Buch P., MacLaren R.E., Anderson P.N., Barker S.E., Duran Y., Bartholomae C., von Kalle C., Heckenlively J.R., Kinnon C., Ali R.R., Thrasher A.J. Effective gene therapy with nonintegrating lentiviral vectors. Nat. Med. 2006;12:348–353. doi: 10.1038/nm1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Philippe S., Sarkis C., Barkats M., Mammeri H., Ladroue C., Petit C., Mallet J., Serguera C. Lentiviral vectors with a defective integrase allow efficient and sustained transgene expression in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:17684–17689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606197103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rahim A.A., Wong A.M., Howe S.J., Buckley S.M., Acosta-Saltos A.D., Elston K.E., Ward N.J., Philpott N.J., Cooper J.D., Anderson P.N., Waddington S.N., Thrasher A.J., Raivich G. Efficient gene delivery to the adult and fetal CNS using pseudotyped non-integrating lentiviral vectors. Gene Ther. 2009;16:509–520. doi: 10.1038/gt.2008.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peluffo H., Foster E., Ahmed S.G., Lago N., Hutson T.H., Moon L., Yip P., Wanisch K., Caraballo-Miralles V., Olmos G., Llado J., McMahon S.B., Yáñez-Muñoz R.J. Efficient gene expression from integration-deficient lentiviral vectors in the spinal cord. Gene Ther. 2013;20:645–657. doi: 10.1038/gt.2012.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lu-Nguyen N.B., Broadstock M., Schliesser M.G., Bartholomae C.C., von Kalle C., Schmidt M., Yáñez-Muñoz R.J. Transgenic expression of human glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor from integration-deficient lentiviral vectors is neuroprotective in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease. Hum. Gene Ther. 2014;25:631–641. doi: 10.1089/hum.2014.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.David A.L., Waddington S.N. Candidate diseases for prenatal gene therapy. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012;891:9–39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-873-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coutelle C., Themis M., Waddington S.N., Buckley S.M., Gregory L.G., Nivsarkar M.S., David A.L., Peebles D., Weisz B., Rodeck C. Gene therapy progress and prospects: fetal gene therapy—first proofs of concept—some adverse effects. Gene Ther. 2005;12:1601–1607. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Waddington S.N., Kramer M.G., Hernandez-Alcoceba R., Buckley S.M., Themis M., Coutelle C., Prieto J. In utero gene therapy: current challenges and perspectives. Mol. Ther. 2005;11:661–676. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Waddington S.N., Buckley S.M., Nivsarkar M., Jezzard S., Schneider H., Dahse T., Kemball-Cook G., Miah M., Tucker N., Dallman M.J., Themis M., Coutelle C. In utero gene transfer of human factor IX to fetal mice can induce postnatal tolerance of the exogenous clotting factor. Blood. 2003;101:1359–1366. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Demaison C., Parsley K., Brouns G., Scherr M., Battmer K., Kinnon C., Grez M., Thrasher A.J. High-level transduction and gene expression in hematopoietic repopulating cells using a human immunodeficiency virus type 1-based lentiviral vector containing an internal spleen focus forming virus promoter. Hum. Gene Ther. 2002;13:803–813. doi: 10.1089/10430340252898984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Follenzi A., Ailles L.E., Bakovic S., Geuna M., Naldini L. Gene transfer by lentiviral vectors is limited by nuclear translocation and rescued by HIV-1 pol sequences. Nat. Genet. 2000;25:217–222. doi: 10.1038/76095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dull T., Zufferey R., Kelly M., Mandel R.J., Nguyen M., Trono D., Naldini L. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. J. Virol. 1998;72:8463–8471. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.11.8463-8471.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Butler S.L., Hansen M.S., Bushman F.D. A quantitative assay for HIV DNA integration in vivo. Nat. Med. 2001;7:631–634. doi: 10.1038/87979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Grieger J.C., Choi V.W., Samulski R.J. Production and characterization of adeno-associated viral vectors. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:1412–1428. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Larson J.E., Cohen J.C. In utero gene therapy. Ochsner J. 2000;2:107–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dejneka N.S., Surace E.M., Aleman T.S., Cideciyan A.V., Lyubarsky A., Savchenko A., Redmond T.M., Tang W., Wei Z., Rex T.S., Glover E., Maguire A.M., Pugh E.N., Jr., Jacobson S.G., Bennett J. In utero gene therapy rescues vision in a murine model of congenital blindness. Mol. Ther. 2004;9:182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Binny C., McIntosh J., Della Peruta M., Kymalainen H., Tuddenham E.G., Buckley S.M., Waddington S.N., McVey J.H., Spence Y., Morton C.L., Thrasher A.J., Gray J.T., Castellino F.J., Tarantal A.F., Davidoff A.M., Nathwani A.C. AAV-mediated gene transfer in the perinatal period results in expression of FVII at levels that protect against fatal spontaneous hemorrhage. Blood. 2012;119:957–966. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-377630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Naldini L., Trono D., Verma I.M. Lentiviral vectors, two decades later. Science. 2016;353:1101–1102. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rahim A.A., Wong A.M., Buckley S.M., Chan J.K., David A.L., Cooper J.D., Coutelle C., Peebles D.M., Waddington S.N. In utero gene transfer to the mouse nervous system. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010;38:1489–1493. doi: 10.1042/BST0381489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Watson D.J., Kobinger G.P., Passini M.A., Wilson J.M., Wolfe J.H. Targeted transduction patterns in the mouse brain by lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with VSV, Ebola, Mokola, LCMV, or MuLV envelope proteins. Mol. Ther. 2002;5:528–537. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Anliker B., Abel T., Kneissl S., Hlavaty J., Caputi A., Brynza J., Schneider I.C., Munch R.C., Petznek H., Kontermann R.E., Koehl U., Johnston I.C., Keinanen K., Muller U.C., Hohenadl C., Monyer H., Cichutek K., Buchholz C.J. Specific gene transfer to neurons, endothelial cells and hematopoietic progenitors with lentiviral vectors. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:929–935. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Buchholz C.J., Friedel T., Buning H. Surface-engineered viral vectors for selective and cell type-specific gene delivery. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:777–790. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hioki H., Kameda H., Nakamura H., Okunomiya T., Ohira K., Nakamura K., Kuroda M., Furuta T., Kaneko T. Efficient gene transduction of neurons by lentivirus with enhanced neuron-specific promoters. Gene Ther. 2007;14:872–882. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jakobsson J., Ericson C., Jansson M., Bjork E., Lundberg C. Targeted transgene expression in rat brain using lentiviral vectors. J. Neurosci. Res. 2003;73:876–885. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brown B.D., Gentner B., Cantore A., Colleoni S., Amendola M., Zingale A., Baccarini A., Lazzari G., Galli C., Naldini L. Endogenous microRNA can be broadly exploited to regulate transgene expression according to tissue, lineage and differentiation state. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:1457–1467. doi: 10.1038/nbt1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Colin A., Faideau M., Dufour N., Auregan G., Hassig R., Andrieu T., Brouillet E., Hantraye P., Bonvento G., Deglon N. Engineered lentiviral vector targeting astrocytes in vivo. Glia. 2009;57:667–679. doi: 10.1002/glia.20795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Miyanohara A., Kamizato K., Juhas S., Juhasova J., Navarro M., Marsala S., Lukacova N., Hruska-Plochan M., Curtis E., Gabel B., Ciacci J., Ahrens E.T., Kaspar B.K., Cleveland D., Marsala M. Potent spinal parenchymal AAV9-mediated gene delivery by subpial injection in adult rats and pigs. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2016;3:16046. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2016.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Foust K.D., Nurre E., Montgomery C.L., Hernandez A., Chan C.M., Kaspar B.K. Intravascular AAV9 preferentially targets neonatal neurons and adult astrocytes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang W., Yi M.J., Chen X., Cole F., Krauss R.S., Kang J.S. Cortical thinning and hydrocephalus in mice lacking the immunoglobulin superfamily member CDO. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:3764–3772. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.10.3764-3772.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saunders N.R., Joakim Ek C., Dziegielewska K.M. The neonatal blood-brain barrier is functionally effective, and immaturity does not explain differential targeting of AAV9. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:804–805. doi: 10.1038/nbt0909-804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duque S., Joussemet B., Riviere C., Marais T., Dubreil L., Douar A.M., Fyfe J., Moullier P., Colle M.A., Barkats M. Intravenous administration of self-complementary AAV9 enables transgene delivery to adult motor neurons. Mol. Ther. 2009;17:1187–1196. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (14.5MB, docx)

RESOURCES