Abstract
While computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have established roles in evaluating Pott's puffy tumour, ultrasound can play a valuable role in identifying the condition, particularly in children. We present the case of a boy with a fluctuant forehead lump and headaches, where ultrasound was the first‐line imaging modality and expedited further investigations.
Keywords: Osteomyelitis, paediatrics, Pott's puffy tumour, X‐ray computed tomography, ultrasonography
Introduction
Head and neck lumps can pose a diagnostic dilemma in children as clinical history can be unclear. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) warrant careful consideration in children, with the radiation burden of the former and need for anaesthesia in younger children and limited availability with the latter. With its lack of ionising radiation, ultrasound is often a first‐line modality in paediatric cases with low clinical likelihood. This is the report of such a case, where ultrasound played a valuable role in determining further timely and appropriate investigations.
Case Report
A 6‐year‐old boy with a month‐long history of fluctuant swelling over the right forehead, and more recent complaints of headache presented to the emergency department. He had been seen twice by a general practitioner in the week prior, had no prior medical history or a recollection of recent trauma. The lump was mildly raised, round and measured approximately 30 mm in diameter. It was tender on palpation and without erythema. Inflammatory markers revealed a normal blood white cell count (8.6 × 109/L), C‐reactive protein (3.3 mg/L) and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (40 mm/h).
Ultrasound of the lump using a high‐frequency linear transducer was conducted (Aplio 500, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). Complete disruption of the outer table of the frontal bone underlying the lump was noted (Fig. 1), with associated periosteal lifting, a subperiosteal collection and surrounding hyperaemia (Fig. 2). Differential diagnoses were osteomyelitis or fracture and haematoma. Decision was made to promptly proceed to unenhanced head CT to further assess bony involvement (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthcare AG, Erlangen, Germany) which confirmed the ultrasound findings (Fig. 3A and B). There was significant opacification of the right paranasal sinuses though no evidence of intracranial extension (Fig. 4). Cranial MRI had also been ordered, but given the lack of intracranial extension on CT, this was considered by the treating team to be unnecessary before proceeding to surgery.
Figure 1.
Longitudinal ultrasound image of the forehead lump with periosteal lifting (B callipers) and disruption of the underlying frontal bone (A callipers).
Figure 2.
Transverse ultrasound image using superb microvascular imaging (SMI) demonstrating some periosteal hyperaemia.
Figure 3.
Computed tomography (CT) surface rendering of the bony erosion (A), compared with the more subtle soft tissue swelling overlying it (B).
Figure 4.
Axial computed tomography (CT) image with sinus opacification, frontal bone erosion and forehead swelling.
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) confirmed Pott's puffy tumour secondary to chronic sinusitis, a 9‐mm polyp was removed and dehiscence of the lamina papyracea was noted. Intravenous antibiotics were administered for 10 days and the patient was discharged without further complication.
Discussion
First described by Sir Percival Pott in the late 18th century, initially in association with head trauma and later with sinusitis, Pott's puffy tumour refers to the presence of a subperiosteal abscess and osteomyelitis of the frontal bone.1 Untreated it can disseminate through venous drainage, and potentially result in a sinocutaneous fistula.2 Intracranial complications such as brain abscess or meningitis are common sequelae.3, 4, 5 A recent review found only 13 documented cases since 1978 in children under 10 years, with presentations more common in adolescents likely due to the development of the valveless diploic venous sytem.2, 6 There are only two documented ultrasound cases of the condition, neither demonstrate the same degree of bony destruction as this case.1, 7
Conclusion
Pott's puffy tumours are rare and presentation in children can be non‐specific. There is often a delay in diagnosis due to its presumed rarity in the post‐antibiotic era. Along with more established imaging modalities, ultrasound can play an important first‐line role in identifying this serious condition, particularly in children.
Acknowledgements
Written informed consent was obtained for this manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing and revision of this manuscript and declare no funding or conflict of interest.
J Med Radiat Sci 65 (2018) 71–73
References
- 1. Vanderveken OM, De Smet K, Dogan‐Duyar S, et al. Pott's puffy tumor in a 5‐year‐old boy: the role of ultrasound and contrast‐enhanced CT imaging‐Surgical case report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Extra 2012; 7(1): 1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Parida PK, Surianarayanan G, Ganeshan S, Saxena SK. Pott's puffy tumor in pediatric age group: a retrospective study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76(9): 1274–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Blumfield E, Misra M. Pott's puffy tumor, intracranial, and orbital complications as the initial presentation of sinusitis in healthy adolescents, a case series. Emerg Radiol 2011; 18(3): 203–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bannon PD, McCormack RF. Pott's puffy tumor and epidural abscess arising from pansinusitis. J Emerg Med 2011; 41(6): 616–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Nicoli TK, Mäkitie A. Frontal Sinusitis Causing Epidural Abscess and Puffy Tumor. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(11): e18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gildener‐Leapman N, Lin A. Pott's puffy tumor in a 5‐year‐old male and a review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Extra 2012; 7(2): 48–51. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Weinberg B, Gupta S, Thomas MJ, Stern H. Pott's puffy tumor: sonographic diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2005; 33(6): 305–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]