Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 18;81(7):e51–e52. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.013

Can Naloxone Be Used to Treat Synthetic Cannabinoid Overdose?

Jermaine D Jones 1, Michelle L Nolan 1, Roshni Daver 1, Sandra D Comer 1, Denise Paone 1
PMCID: PMC5846114  NIHMSID: NIHMS947310  PMID: 27765269

To the Editor

Synthetic cannabinoids, commonly known as K2 or Spice, have emerged as a recreational drug and an inexpensive alternative to cannabis (1). Currently, there is no antidote for synthetic cannabinoid overdose/overintoxication, and clinical care typically only includes symptom management. However, naloxone, a drug used to treat opioid overdose, might prove beneficial (2,3). Naloxone is a nonselective opioid antagonist increasingly used by medical personnel and laypersons to reverse overdose due to the use of opioid analgesics and heroin (4).

Why might an opioid receptor antagonist affect a drug that acts on the cannabinoid receptor? Studies show that opioid and cannabinoid receptors are colocalized in multiple brain regions where they may exist as heterodimeric systems. Both receptors also have cross-modulatory pharmacologic effects, including cross-agonism, -antagonism, -sensitization, and -tolerance (5,6). Accordingly, several studies suggest that opioid receptor antagonists might counter the effects of cannabinoid agonists (2,7).

In April 2015, synthetic cannabinoid-related emergency department visits increased dramatically in New York City. In response, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene conducted a public health investigation to gain a better understanding of the circumstances, presenting symptoms, and severity of synthetic cannabinoid overdose. Twenty-seven medical charts were identified from citywide emergency department records and reviewed; 15 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion: patient was admitted to the hospital April 10–20, 2015, and synthetic cannabinoid use was documented in the medical record. The medical chart review identified four cases with documentation of improved symptomology after the administration of naloxone (Table 1). In each of these cases we found evidence of increased responsiveness and/or normalized vital signs after naloxone administration. These four cases were of particular interest because there was no evidence of recent opioid use (either by self-report or in drug toxicology) that would account for symptom improvement after naloxone administration.

Table 1.

Summary of Medical Details From Four Cases of Suspected Synthetic Cannabinoid Overintoxication

Sex Race Age, Years Location Chief Complaint Symptoms Naloxone Administered By Response to Pain Self-Reported Drug Use Drug Toxicology BAC (mg/dL) Presenting Vitals (EMS) Final Vitals (ED) Outcome Mental Health Hx


HR/beat/min O2 Sat, % RR, breaths/min BP, mm Hg HR, beats/min O2 Sat, % RR/breaths/min BP, mm Hg
M B 30 Street Altered mental status Lethargy/sleepiness, nonresponsiveness to verbal stimuli, respiratory depression, mild respiratory acidosis, vomiting, seizure, chest pain EMS Responsive SynCan Negative (amphetamine and cannabis were not tested) NR 116 6 128/80 60 98 19 127/74 Discharged SCZD

F B 36 Shelter Nonresponsive Drowsiness, sluggishness, nonresponsiveness to verbal stimuli, tachycardia, vomiting, confusion, lethargy/sleepiness, loss of consciousness, intoxication EMS Responsive SynCan Not performed 0 80 16 114/73 61 100 16 99/54 Admitted None

M W 61 Street Nonresponsive, seizure Lethargy, intoxication, nonresponsiveness to verbal stimuli, rapid breathing, tachycardia, loss of consciousness EMS Responsive SynCan, alcohol Negative 18 141 87 30 89 98 16 106/59 Admitted, left AMA Alcohol abuse

M NR 46 Home Nonresponsive, confusion Nonresponsiveness to verbal stimuli, borderline hypotension, confusion, elevated CO2, lactic acidosis EMS Non-responsive SynCan, alcohol Negative 46 95 Admitted None

AMA, against medical advice; B, black; BAC, blood alcohol content; BP, blood pressure; ED, emergency department; EMS, emergency medical services; F, female; HR, heart rate; Hx, history; M, male; NR, not reported; RR, respiratory rate; Sat, saturation; SCZD, schizophrenia; SynCan, synthetic cannabinoid; W, white.

In New York City, first responders have been trained to administer naloxone in instances of suspected opioid use or respiratory depression. Although these cases tentatively suggest that the administration of naloxone led to symptom improvement, this conclusion should be made with caution. In each of these cases a number of treatment interventions may have been used aiding in resolution of adverse symptoms. In addition, little is known about the time course of synthetic cannabinoid overdose, and symptoms may have improved without medical intervention. Finally, in two of the four cases there is evidence of alcohol use. Opioid antagonists also block alcohol-mediated effects, which may account for some degree of symptom improvement (8).

Another interesting finding from these cases is the shared clinical presentation of synthetic cannabinoid overdose to opioid overdose (9). The co-occurrence of symptoms such as loss of alertness, unconsciousness, and decreased respiratory measures may further demonstrate the interrelatedness of endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems and may add credibility to the potential utility of naloxone in cases of synthetic cannabinoid overdose. Again, we stress caution in drawing conclusions from only four cases. In addition, because synthetic cannabinoids include hundreds of different chemical compounds, their chemical composition and resultant neuropharmacology is varied. Therefore, the efficacy of naloxone to improve symptoms after synthetic cannabinoid use may vary depending on the exact synthetic cannabinoid compound(s) involved. Despite these limitations, these case results provide a basis to initiate further investigation into how clinicians might address the adverse health consequences of a class of drugs with no presently known antidote.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant No. R01DA035207.

Footnotes

Disclosures

SDC has received compensation (in the form of partial salary support) over the past 3 years from investigator-initiated studies supported by Reckitt-Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough Corporation, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Endo Pharmaceuticals, and MediciNova and has also served as a consultant to Grunenthal USA, Guidepoint Global, Mallinckrodt, Neuromed, Orexo, Pfizer, and Salix. All other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Castaneto MS, Gorelick DA, Desrosiers NA, Hartman RL, Pirard S, Huestis MA. Synthetic cannabinoids: Epidemiology, pharmaco-dynamics, and clinical implications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;144:12–41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Justinova Z, Tanda G, Munzar P, Goldberg SR. The opioid antagonist naltrexone reduces the reinforcing effects of Delta 9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004;173:186–194. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1693-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenbaum CD, Carreiro SP, Babu KM. Here today, gone tomorrow…and back again? A review of herbal marijuana alternatives (K2, Spice), synthetic cathinones (bath salts), kratom, Salvia divinorum, methoxetamine, and piperazines. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8:15–32. doi: 10.1007/s13181-011-0202-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA Opioid Overdose Prevention Toolkit. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2016. HHS Publication No. SMA16-4742. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Robledo P, Berrendero F, Ozaita A, Maldonado R. Advances in the field of cannabinoid–opioid cross-talk. Addict Biol. 2008;13:213–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scavone JL, Sterling RC, Van Bockstaele EJ. Cannabinoid and opioid interactions: Implications for opiate dependence and withdrawal. Neuroscience. 2013;248:637–654. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haney M, Ramesh D, Glass A, Pavlicova M, Bedi G, Cooper ZD. Naltrexone maintenance decreases cannabis self-administration and subjective effects in daily cannabis smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2489–2498. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Brien CP, Volpicelli LA, Volpicelli JR. Naltrexone in the treatment of alcoholism: A clinical review. Alcohol. 1996;13:35–39. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(95)02038-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doyon S. Opiods. In: Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS, Ma OJ, Cline DM, editors. Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 6. Chapter 167. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004. pp. 1071–1075. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES