In Table 3, the values in the fifth column are incorrect. Please see the corrected Table 3 here.
Table 3. Species model change metrics.
Presence Area 2010 | Presence Area 2100 | Net Δ (km2) | % Δ | Latitude Δ (km) | Coast Distance Δ (km) | Elevation Δ (m) | Community | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dicrostonyx groenlandicus | 603,960 | 550,725 | -53,235 | -9 | -25 | 8 | 67 | cold-climate |
Microtus miurus | 589,108 | 377,223 | -211,885 | -36 | 130 | -3 | 167 | cold-climate |
Microtus oeconomus | 1,083,164 | 823,741 | -259,423 | -24 | 105 | 45 | 89 | cold-climate |
Sorex ugyunak | 412,527 | 198,763 | -213,764 | -52 | 85 | -6 | -66 | cold-climate |
Mean | 672,190 | 487,613 | -184,577 | -30 | 74 | 11 | 64 | cold-climate |
Microtus longicaudus | 206,803 | 336,130 | 129,327 | 63 | 35 | 7 | 33 | continental |
Sorex monticolus | 335,761 | 382,230 | 46,469 | 14 | -595 | -148 | 108 | continental |
Mean | 271,282 | 359,180 | 87,898 | 38 | -280 | -71 | 71 | continental |
Microtus rutilus | 803,289 | 609,189 | -194,100 | -24 | 135 | 9 | 105 | interior |
Microtus xanthognathus | 355,644 | 219,628 | -136,016 | -38 | 45 | 32 | 76 | interior |
Sorex cinereus | 1,192,694 | 1,105,717 | -86,977 | -7 | 50 | 12 | 4 | interior |
Sorex hoyi | 607,161 | 637,943 | 30,782 | 5 | 130 | 6 | 21 | interior |
Mean | 739,697 | 643,119 | -96,578 | -16 | 90 | 15 | 51 | interior |
Lemmus trimucronatus | 702,596 | 395,636 | -306,960 | -44 | 210 | 20 | 41 | northern |
Sorex tundrensis | 867,006 | 455,138 | -411,868 | -48 | 280 | 2 | 6 | northern |
Sorex yukonicus | 418,908 | 259,669 | -159,239 | -38 | 75 | -12 | -47 | northern |
Mean | 662,837 | 370,148 | -292,689 | -43 | 188 | 3 | 0 | northern |
Microtus pennsylvanicus | 335,399 | 294,218 | -41,181 | -12 | -90 | -71 | -1 | southern |
Sorex palustris | 237,571 | 1,049,427 | 811,856 | 342 | 85 | -1 | -202 | southern |
Sorex borealis | 532,151 | 979,025 | 446,874 | 84 | -50 | -63 | -20 | southern |
Zapus hudsonius | 438,181 | 1,010,635 | 572,454 | 131 | 155 | 12 | 115 | southern |
Mean | 385,826 | 833,326 | 447,501 | 136 | 25 | -31 | -27 | southern |
This error has also caused the following errors in the text:
There are errors in the first paragraph under the subheading “Model Change between 2010 and 2100” in the Results section. The correct paragraph is: Comparisons between current and future species distribution models showed an average loss in area of 29% for all species in the cold-climate, northern, and interior community groups (Table 3). Among these groups, only the pygmy shrew (S. hoyi) experienced increases in total area (5%). In contrast, distributions of all species in the continental and southern communities increased by an average of 103%, with the only exception being that the area occupied by meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) decreased by 12%.
There is an error in the first sentence of the fifth paragraph under the subheading “Model Change between 2010 and 2100” in the Results section. The correct sentence is: Distributions of species in the southern community were projected to grow by an average of 136% in area between 2010 and 2100.
There is an error in the last sentence of the last paragraph under the subheading “Distribution Shifts” in the Discussion section. The correct sentence is: We predicted losses of just 9% in total collared lemming distribution by 2100, which sharply contradicts other results, but may be explained by modest habitat gains predicted for southern mountain ranges that were not predicted by Prost et al. [4].
Reference
- 1.Baltensperger AP, Huettmann F (2015) Predicted Shifts in Small Mammal Distributions and Biodiversity in the Altered Future Environment of Alaska: An Open Access Data and Machine Learning Perspective. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132054 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]