Skip to main content
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery logoLink to European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
. 2017 Feb 13;51(4):674–679. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw400

Incidence of occult pN2 disease following resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection in clinical stage I lung cancer patients

Andrea Bille a, Kaitlin M Woo b, Usman Ahmad a, Nabil P Rizk a, David R Jones a,*
PMCID: PMC5848815  PMID: 28200091

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Early clinical stage (T1 and T2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly treated with anatomic lung resection and lymph node sampling or dissection. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence and the distribution of occult N2 disease according to tumour location and the short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent anatomic lung resection and lymphadenectomy. Mediastinal lymphadenectomy (ML) was defined as resection of at least 2 mediastinal stations, always including station 7 lymph nodes. Patients who had a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy were excluded.

RESULTS: One thousand six hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients met inclusion criteria and were included. Overall, 9% (146/1667) of the patients had occult pN2 disease. At multivariable analysis, adenocarcinoma histology and vascular invasion were independently associated with greater risk of occult pN2 disease. In left and right upper lobe tumours, station 7 nodes were involved in 5 and 13% of pN2 positive cases, respectively. Station 5 and station 2/4 nodes were involved in 29 and 18% of left and right lower lobe pN2 tumours, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality, and postoperative morbidity was 28%. The median overall survival was 77.4 months. N0 patients had a median overall survival of 83.7 months vs 48.0 months and 37.9 months in N1 and N2 populations, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen percent of pN2 patients had mediastinal lymph node metastasis beyond the lobe-specific lymphatic drainage. We recommend a complete lymphadenectomy be performed, even in clinical stage I NSCLC.

Keywords: Lymphadenectomy , Pathological N2 disease , Survival

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for the treatment of early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an anatomic lung resection with a sampling or systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection [1]. Some studies have suggested that for early clinical stage disease, selective mediastinal node removal according to known patterns of nodal spread may be appropriate [2].

Supporting this approach are studies that show occult mediastinal nodal disease is rare in early stage NSCLC [3], and when occult mediastinal nodal disease does occur, it preferentially occurs in a predictable pattern [4, 5]. Upper lobe tumours follow predictable lobe specific pathways: right upper lobe tumours involve primarily station 4R (>60% of cases), left upper lobe tumours involve primarily level 5–6 (>70% of cases), and both lower lobes involve primarily station 7 (65% of cases) [57]. Riquet et al. [8] report that more than 70% of right upper lobe tumours and more than 95% of left upper lobe tumours only involve station 2–4 or 5–6 respectively, while more than 50% of lower lobe tumours involve only station 7. Based on these observations, a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy has been proposed as an alternative approach with a low risk for under-sampling N2 disease in patients with early clinical stage NSCLC [911]. However, the majority of studies supporting a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy are post-hoc analyses based on final pathologic information. Therefore, the groups of patients who may benefit from a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy and the relevance of this lymphadenectomy in early clinical stage lung cancer remain unclear.

To answer whether a systematic lymphadenectomy is appropriate in early clinical stage NSCLC, we retrospectively reviewed patients with cT1/T2N0M0 lung cancer who underwent a systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy (ML), and evaluated the incidence and the distribution of occult pN1 and pN2 disease, the incidence of pN2 disease beyond the lobe-specific lymphatic drainage and the short- and long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review from 2000–12 of patients with cT1/T2aN0M0 NSCLC who underwent a surgical resection with curative intent with a mediastinal node dissection. The seventh edition of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer was used for TNM staging [12]. Inclusion criteria were clinical stage I disease as determined by computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, the performance of a hilar lymphadenectomy, and a mediastinal nodal dissection.

Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of less than 10 mm and non-FDG-avid on PET (SUVmax <2.5) were considered cN0. Patients with any clinical suspicion of N2 disease based on PET or CT findings underwent surgical staging of their mediastinum (i.e. mediastinoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound biopsy) and were excluded from this analysis regardless of the results of those staging studies. Patients with carcinoid tumours, synchronous cancers without a complete lymphadenectomy (n = 15), patients who had a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy (n = 1228), a bilobectomy (n = 66) or a pneumonectomy (n = 70) were excluded. In addition to operative and clinical staging details, patient demographics and clinicopathologic details were obtained.

ML was defined as resection of at least 2 mediastinal stations, always including station 7. For right sided tumours, additional stations included stations 2 or 4 R and/or 8 or 9; and for left sided tumours this included stations 5 or 6 and/or stations 8 or 9 [2]. Of note, this category also includes patients who underwent a more extensive ML, defined as removal of 3 or more mediastinal lymph node stations according to the ESTS and IASLC definition [1, 13]. Skip metastases were defined as N2 lymph node involvement without N1 involvement. Given the retrospective analysis and surgeon preference, our definition of ML includes patients who had en bloc lymphadenectomies which includes the surrounding fat along the anatomic boundaries.

Statistics

Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, medians and ranges were utilized for patient and tumour characteristics. Associations between patient and tumour characteristics with spread to lymph nodes (N0/N1 vs N2) were analysed using univariable logistic regression and Wald tests. A multivariable model was built using factors with P < 0.10 in univariable analyses and guided by clinical judgment. Associations between tumour characteristics and skip metastases in the N2 subset cohort were analysed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

Recurrence was analysed using competing risks methods. The risk of recurrence, the event of interest, was quantified using a cumulative incidence function that accounted for 2 competing events: new primary and death without recurrence. Time was calculated from date of surgery until recurrence (event of interest), new primary (competing event) or death (competing event), whichever occurred first. Patients who were alive without recurrence or new primary at the end of the study period were censored at the date of last available follow-up. Gray’s test was used to compare the cumulative incidence (of recurrence) functions of subgroups [11, 12].

Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Time was calculated from date of surgery until death. Patients were followed in the survivorship program [14] and data prospectively collected. Patients who were still alive at the end of the study period were censored at the date of last available follow-up. The log-rank test was used to compare the OS between subgroups. The association of positive N2 station and skip metastases with OS was analysed in the N2 subset cohort.

All P-values were two-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were done in R (version 3.2.0, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) including the ‘survival’ and ‘cmprsk’ packages.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred and forty-eight consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria underwent 1667 resections with ML between January 2000 and December 2012. Nineteen patients had 2 operations for a new synchronous (n = 14) or metachronous (n = 5) primary lung cancer. Median age was 69 and 41% of the patients were male (Table 1). Lobectomy was performed in 1329 (80%), segmentectomy in 199 (12%) and a wedge resection in 139 (8%) patients. The median number of lymph node stations resected was 4 (range 2–9). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The incidence of N1 disease and N2 disease in our study population was 8 and 9%, respectively.

Table 1:

Clinicopathologic characteristics (n = 1667)

Characteristic Number %
Sex
 Male 681 41
 Female 986 59
Age, years, median (range) 69 (28–89)
 ≤70 944 57
 >70 723 43
Laterality
 Right 1094 66
 Left 573 34
Location
 Right upper lobe 474 28
 Right middle lobe 59 4
 Right lower lobe 452 27
 Left upper lobe 400 24
 Left lower lobe 282 17
Median diameter of lesion, cm (range) 2.3 (0–14)
 Size 0–2 cm 743 45
 Size 2.1–4 cm 694 42
 Size >4 cm 228 14
 Missing 2 0.1
Median SUVmax (range)a 4.65 (0–42)
Surgical approach
 VATS 487 29
 Open 1180 71
Type of resection
 Wedge resection 139 8
 Segmentectomy 199 12
 Lobectomy 1329 80
Pathological N status
 N0 1384 83
 N1 137 8
 N2 146 9
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma 738 44
 Lepidic-predominant 548 33
 Squamous 269 16
 Other 113 7
Vascular invasion
 No 1014 61
 Yes 566 34
 Unknown 87 5
Visceral pleural involvement
 No 1360 82
 Yes 258 15
Postoperative complication
 No 1196 72
 Yes 471 28
Median length of stay, days (range) 5 (1–225)

Patients with parietal pleural involvement (n = 16) or with unknown involvement of visceral pleura (n = 33) were excluded.

VATS: video-assisted thoracic surgery.

a

SUVmax = 0, patients with no avid lesions.

Incidence of occult N2 disease

Nine percent (146/1667) of patients had occult pN2 disease. In our study population, 888 had only 2 mediastinal lymph node stations removed and 779 had 3 or more lymph node stations removed: 74 (8.3%) and 72 (9.2%) pN2 were discovered, respectively (P = 0.5). The proportion of pN2 disease in stage IA and IB was 6.7 and 9.3% (P = 0.18). On univariable analysis, comparing risk factors for patients with pN2 disease, tumours located in the left side, adenocarcinoma histology, T size, vascular invasion, pleural invasion and a SUVmax > 4.6 (median value of our population) were significantly associated with higher risk of occult pN2 disease (Table 2). Multivariable analysis confirmed that histology (adenocarcinoma) and vascular invasion were independently associated with greater risk of occult pN2 disease (Table 3).

Table 2:

Univariable analysis of associations with pN2 disease in clinical stage I NSCLC

Characteristics OR 95% CI P-value
Age (>70 vs ≤ 70) 0.96 (0.68–1.35) 0.82
Sex (female vs male) 0.84 (0.59–1.18) 0.32
Approach (VATS vs open) 0.32 (0.19–0.52) <0.001
Type of procedure
 Lobectomy Ref.
 Segmentectomy 0.33 (0.15–0.71) 0.004
 Wedge 0.33 (0.13–0.78) 0.018
Location of the primary tumour
 Left upper lobe Ref.
 Left lower lobe 0.90 (0.53–1.53) 0.70
 Right lower lobe 0.73 (0.45–1.18) 0.20
 Right middle lobe 0.86 (0.32–2.27) 0.76
 Right upper lobe 0.95 (0.60–1.49) 0.81
SUVmax (>4.65 vs ≤ 4.65) 1.85 (1.24–2.77) 0.003
Size
 ≤2 cm Ref.
 >2 and ≤4 cm 1.48 (1.01–2.17) 0.044
 >4 cm 1.86 (1.14–3.05) 0.014
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma Ref.
 Other 0.43 (0.18–1.00) 0.051
Squamous cell 0.32 (0.17–0.61) <0.001
 Lepidic 0.62 (0.42–0.91) 0.016
Visceral pleura involvement (yes vs no) 2.54 (1.73–3.72) <0.001
Laterality (left vs right) 0.66 (0.47–0.94) 0.020
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 5.58 (3.78–8.23) <0.001
Perineural invasion 3.56 (1.93–6.57) <0.001

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Table 3:

Multivariable analysis of associations with pN2 disease

Characteristics OR 95% CI P-value
Laterality (left vs right) 0.73 (0.48–1.12) 0.15
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma Ref.
 Other 0.42 (0.16–1.11) 0.080
 Squamous cell 0.32 (0.15–0.71) 0.005
 Lepidic 1.06 (0.65–1.71) 0.82
Size
 ≤2 cm
 >2 and ≤4 cm 0.88 (0.54–1.42) 0.59
 >4 cm 0.97 (0.50–1.87) 0.92
Visceral pleura involvement (yes vs no) 1.36 (0.85–2.20) 0.20
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 6.24 (3.76–10.35) <0.001
SUVmax (>4.65 vs ≤ 4.65) 1.58 (0.98–2.55) 0.062

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Distribution of N2 disease

Occult pN2 occurred in 146 (146/1667, 9%) patients who had a systematic ML according to the ESTS definition (n = 779). These patients were used to analyse the distribution of nodal disease based on the tumour location (Table 4). Left upper lobe tumours (n = 39) metastasized in 37 (95%) patients to level 5–6 only, in 2 patients (5%) to level 7, in 1 case skipping level 5–6. Left lower lobe tumours (n = 25) metastasized to level 7 in 17 (68%) patients, but in 8 (32%) patients there was disease at level 5–6. In 5 of these patients, there was only involvement of stations 5–6; in 3 (12%) patients pN2 disease was detected at level 8–9 only. On the right, lower lobe tumours (n = 33) involved level 7 in 28 cases (85%), involved level 4R in 6 cases (18%), while skipping level 7 in 3 of them, and involved level 7 and 8–9 in 2 cases. In middle lobe tumours (n = 5), 4 cases metastasized to level 7, and level 4R was involved in 1 case. Right upper lobe tumours (n = 44) involved level 4R in 42 (95%) cases and level 7 in 6 cases (14%), skipping level 4R in 2 cases. There was no significant association between OS and specific N2 positive station location (P = 0.67).

Table 4:

Positive pN2 disease relative to tumour location

LN station Right upper Right middle Right lower Left upper Left lower
2/4R 38 1 3 0 0
2/4R and 7 4 0 3 0 0
7 2 4 23 1 10
8/9 0 0 2 0 3
7 and 8/9 0 0 2 0 4
5/6 0 0 0 37 5
5/6 and 7 0 0 0 1 3

LN: lymph node.

Skip metastases

Forty-seven of 139 (34%) patients with pN2 disease did not have associated pN1 disease identified. For 7 patients, there was no information about skip metastases. The proportion of patients with visceral pleural invasion was significantly lower in patients with skip metastases than in patients with N1 and N2 disease, 17 vs 38% (P = 0.012). There was no association between skip metastases and age, sex, laterality, tumour location, histology, tumour size, vascular invasion or SUVmax (Table 5). All 139 patients with skip metastases and N2 disease died with a median survival of 37.5 months (range 32–51). There was no difference in survival between patients with or without skip metastases: median OS 38.2 vs 37.5 months (P = 0.34).

Table 5:

Associations of patient factors and skip N2 disease

Characteristics No skip N2 (n = 92) n (%) Skip N2 (n = 47) n (%) P-value
Age 0.36
 ≤70 50 (54) 30 (64)
 >70 42 (46) 17 (36)
Sex 0.71
 Female 60 (65) 29 (62)
 Male 32 (35) 18 (38)
Laterality 0.59
 Right 49 (53) 28 (60)
 Left 43 (47) 19 (40)
Primary tumour location 0.28
 Left upper lobe 25 (27) 14 (30)
 Left lower lobe 19 (21) 5 (11)
 Right lower lobe 17 (18) 13 (28)
 Right middle lobe 2 (2) 3 (6)
 Right upper lobe 29 (32) 12 (26)
SUVmax median (range) 5.95 (0.0-27.0) 6.2 (1.4-25.0) 0.42
Size (cm)a 0.87
 ≤2 cm 28 (31) 16 (34)
 >2 and ≤4 cm 43 (48) 23 (49)
 >4 cm 19 (21) 8 (17)
Histology 0.49
 Adenocarcinoma 56 (61) 27 (57)
 Other 3 (3) 3 (6)
 Squamous cell 5 (5) 5 (11)
 Lepidic 28 (31) 12 (26)
Visceral pleura involvement 0.012
 No 57 (62) 39 (83)
 Yes 35 (38) 8 (17)
Vascular invasionb 0.68
 No 22 (25) 13 (29)
 Yes 65 (75) 32 (71)
a

Excludes 2 patients with missing data.

b

Excludes 7 patients with missing data.

Short- and long-term outcomes

In our study population, the median length of stay in hospital was 5 days (range 1–225), 28% of patients had postoperative complications, and there was no in-hospital mortality. The 30-day mortality was 3.6% (n = 61) and the 90-day mortality was 2.5% (n = 42). The most common complications were atrial fibrillation 7.5% (n = 125), prolonged air leak 6.2% (n = 103), pneumonia 4.8% (n = 81), chylothorax 1% (n = 17) and postoperative bleeding 0.4% (n = 6).

OS was evaluated in 1621 patients who had an R0 resection, excluding 24 R1 resections and 3 R2 resections. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients received adjuvant treatment: 205 chemotherapy alone, 27 radiotherapy alone and 25 chemoradiation. Data on any adjuvant therapy are complete for 1593/1621(98.3%) with data missing for 28 patients. The median follow-up was 34.7 months (range 5 days–172.2 months), and there were 722 deaths. No patient was lost to follow-up. The median OS and 5-year OS were 77.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 72.6–82.2 months] and 61%, respectively. Patients who had 2 mediastinal lymph node stations resected had a median OS of 75.5 months (95% CI 67.7–83.3 months) and patients who had a complete mediastinal lymph node dissection with at least 3 mediastinal lymph node stations resected had a median OS of 78.5 months (95% CI 71.5–85.5 months). pN0 patients had a median OS of 83.7 months vs 48.0 months and 37.9 months in pN1 and pN2 populations, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year OS was 65.7% for pN0, 43.7% for pN1, and 36.4% for pN2 patients (Fig. 1).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Overall survival of patients according to N status (N = 1621).

Three hundred and sixty-five patients experienced recurrence, and 114 patients developed a new primary lung cancer. The 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 21.9%, and it was higher for distant compared to loco-regional recurrence: 16.5 vs 5.4%. The 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was higher in the pN2 compared to the pN0/N1 population: 49.4% vs 19.0% (Fig. 2).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Cumulative incidence of recurrence according to N status (N = 1667).

DISCUSSION

The standard treatment for early stage lung cancer is surgery: lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection or sampling. The role and the extension of the lymphadenectomy on survival remain controversial, but accurate mediastinal staging is important for prognostic reasons as well as to determine the need for adjuvant therapies. Now that high resolution CT and PET scans are available to better detect lymph node metastasis, several groups have proposed a lobe-specific mediastinal lymph node assessment based on tumour location [5, 7].

Our study evaluated the patterns of occult N2 disease and skip N2 metastasis in early clinical stage NSCLC and the short- and long-term results after complete ML. The incidence of occult pN2 disease in our series did not vary significantly between clinical T1a and T1b NSCLC. Independent risk factors for occult pN2 disease were histology and the presence of vascular invasion. Several studies have confirmed that adenocarcinoma histology is associated with a higher risk for occult pN2 disease [15, 16]. SUVmax was only marginally significant, but tumour size and location of the tumour were not found to be independent risk factors for pN2 disease in contrast to a prior report [17]. SUVmax and tumour pT2a were found to be prognostic factors to develop pN2 disease in a recent publication [18]. Finally, we did not find an association with younger age and increased risk of pN2 disease as previously reported [19].

The side of tumour was correlated with occult N2 disease only at the univariable analysis, but was not confirmed to be an independent predictor of pN2 disease on multivariable analysis. The number of patients with occult pN2 disease was lower on the left compared to the right side. As previously reported, this may be related to the challenges of performing a more extensive ML of the left L4 and L2 paratracheal area for anatomical reasons, which make access more difficult, particularly when performing minimally-invasive approaches [20].

The impact of approach (VATS versus open surgery) and type of resection on occult pN2 disease was not an independent prognostic factor in our series. While some studies have suggested that upstaging from N0 to N1 and from N0 to N2 is higher in open compared to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resections [21, 22], most groups have found no difference in nodal station dissection rates [23] and nearly all studies have shown equivalent overall survival rates between these 2 approaches [24, 25]. While not specifically analysed in our study, we believe any lung cancer resection procedure should incorporate a mediastinal nodal dissection/sampling regardless of the approach.

As expected, we did observe an association between nodal status and survival. The 5-year overall survival in our series was 61%. pN2 patients had a 5-year survival of 36% compared to 66% for patients with N0 disease. Asamura et al. and Riquet et al. published similar survival rates for pN2 patients [6, 26]. Occult pN2 disease was also associated with a higher risk of recurrence, mainly distant recurrence. When occult N2 disease is encountered intraoperatively we favour complete resection of all nodal tissue in addition to performing the lung resection as suggested by Detterbeck [27]. Benefits of this approach are prognostic, allow appropriate selection for adjuvant therapies, and, perhaps most importantly, achieve an R0 resection.

According to the published literature, lymphatic drainage from each lobe usually follows a well-described anatomic route. This concept of a ‘fixed’ lymphatic drainage path is the underlying premise to perform a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy. Upper lobe tumours usually drain to the lymph nodes of the upper mediastinum (stations 2–6), and middle and lower lobe tumours drain to nodes in the lower mediastinum (stations 7–9) [5, 28]. An important observation of our study is that 16% of clinically node-negative, stage I NSCLC patients had N2 disease that did not follow a lobe-specific lymphatic drainage pattern. Restated, this means that if a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy had been performed in this series, 16% of pN2 patients could have been understaged, not offered evidence-based adjuvant therapy, and did not have a R0 resection. This result compares favourably to the study by Riquet et al. [26]. Sun and colleagues demonstrated that the survival in patients with lymph node metastasis beyond lobe-specific nodes had a significantly worse prognosis with median survival and 5-year survival of 24 months and 11.7% [28]. Collectively, our study and others do not support a lobe-specific lymphadenectomy as advocated by other groups [5, 29].

Limitations

Limitations of this study include that it is a retrospective, single centre analysis. This introduces potential selection biases which cannot be controlled for retrospectively. While our institution has a long history of performing mediastinal node dissection [30] we cannot control for the exact types of lymphadenectomy which recently have been more codified [1]. Despite these limitations, our study is a large series that examines the incidence of occult N2 disease of clinically node-negative, stage I NSCLC of which all patients had CT and PET imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, based on our observations we recommend a systematic mediastinal nodal dissection be performed even in early, clinical stage I NSCLC. Current intraoperative sentinel nodal imaging studies are not refined to guide the extent of N2 nodal dissection. Moreover, specific tumour biologies, genomic signatures, histologies and subtypes may be more prone to N2 disease, but evidence to selectively sample or dissect N2 nodes based on these criteria is absent.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Thanks to Dr Valerie Rusch for reviewing the paper and for her important suggestions to improve the quality of this paper

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lardinois D, De Leyn P, Van Schil P, Porta RR, Waller D, Passlick B. et al. ESTS guidelines or intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:787–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Maniwa T, Okumura T, Isaka M, Nakagawa K, Ohde Y, Kondo H.. Recurrence of mediastinal node cancer after lobe specific systematic nodal dissection for non small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:e59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Defranchi SA, Cassivi SD, Nichols FC, Allen MS, Shen KR, Deschamps C. et al. N2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:924–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS.. Distribution and likelihood of lymph node metastasis based on the lobar location of Nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1969–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shapiro M, Kadakia S, Lim J, Breglio A, Wisnivesky JP, Kaufman A. et al. Lobe-specific nodal dissection is sufficient during lobectomy by video assisted thoracic surgery or thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer. Chest 2013;144:1615–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Asamura H, Nakayama H, Kondo H, Tsuchiya R, Naruke T.. Lobe-specific extent of systematic lymph node dissection for non-small cell lung carcinomas according to a retrospective study of metastasis and prognosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1102–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rusch VW, Crowley J, Giroux DJ, Goldstraw P, Im JG, Tsuboi M. et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:603–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Riquet M, Hidden G, Debesse B.. Direct lymphatic drainage of lung segments to the mediastinal nodes. An anatomic study on 260 adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:623–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rami-Porta R, Mateu-Navarro M, Freixinet J, de la Torre M, Torres-Garcia AJ, Pun YW. et al. Type of resection and prognosis in lung cancer. Experience in a multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:622–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Okada M, Sakamoto T, Yuki T, Mimura T, Miyoshi K, Tsubota N.. Effect of selective lymph node dissection based on patterns of lobe-specific lymph node metastases on patient outcome in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a large-scale retrospective cohort study applying a propensity score. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:1001–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ishiguro F, Matsuo K, Fukui T, Mori S, Hatooka S, Mitsudomi T.. Selective mediastinal lymphadenectomy for clinico-surgical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1028–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Shepherd FA, Crowley J, Van Houtte P, Postmus PE, Carney D, Chansky K. et al. International association for the study of lung cancer international staging committee and participating institutions. The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project: proposals regarding the clinical staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:1067–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Goldstrow P. Report on the international workshop on intrathoracic staging. October 1996. Lung Cancer 1997;18:107–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Huang J, Logue AE, Ostroff JS, Park BJ, McCabe M, Jones DR. et al. Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:955–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. De Leyn P, Vansteenkiste J, Cuypers P, Deneffe G, Van Raemdonck D, Coosemans W. et al. Role of cervical mediastinoscopy in staging of non-small cell lung cancer without enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on CT scan. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:706–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Suzuki K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Takahashi K, Nishiwaki Y.. Clinical predictors of N2 disease in the setting of a negative computed tomographic scan in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:593–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang Y, Sun Y, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Hu H, Chen H.. A prediction model for N2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:1360–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fiorelli A, Sagan D, Mackiewicz L, Cagini L, Scarnecchia E, Chiodini P. et al. Incidence, risk factors, and analysis of survival of unexpected N2 disease in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;63:558–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shafazand S, Gould MKA.. Clinical prediction rule to estimate the probability of mediastinal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2006;1:953–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Keller SM, Adak S, Wagner H, Johnson DH.. Mediastinal lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with stages II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:358–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Licht PB, Jørgensen OD, Ladegaard L, Jakobsen E.. A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:943–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mathisen DJ. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy inferior to open lobectomy oncologically? Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:755–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Watanabe A, Mishina T, Ohori S, Koyanagi T, Nakashima S, Mawatari T. et al. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery a feasible approach for clinical N0 and postoperatively pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:812–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Stephens N, Rice D, Correa A, Hoffstetter W, Mehran R, Roth J. et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with improved short-term and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open lobectomy for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of 963 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;46:607–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kuritzky AM, Aswad BI, Jones RN, Ng T.. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery vs muscle-sparing thoracotomy for stage I lung cancer: a critical evaluation of short- and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:1044–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Riquet M, Rivera C, Pricopi C, Arame A, Mordant P, Foucault C. et al. Is the lymphatic drainage of lung cancer lobe-specific? A surgical appraisal. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;47:543–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Detterbeck F. What to do with “Surprise” N2?: intraoperative management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:289–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sun Y, Gao W, Zheng H, Jiang G, Chen C, Zhang L.. Mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis beyond the lobe-specific: an independent risk factor toward worse prognosis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;20:284–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Adachi H, Sakamaki K, Nishii T, Yamamoto T, Nagashima T, Ishikawa Y. et al. Lobe-specific lymph node dissection as a standard procedure in surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study. J Thorac Oncol 2016; pii: S1556-0864(16)30847-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Martini N, Flehinger BJ, Zaman MB, Beattie EJ Jr.. Results of resection in non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung with mediastinal lymph node metastases. Ann Surg 1983;198:386–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES