Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 20;17(8):754. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.009

Cloudy, Foul Smelling Urine Not a Criteria for Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Older Adults

Robin L P Jump a, Christopher J Crnich b, David A Nace c,*
PMCID: PMC5849433  NIHMSID: NIHMS946793  PMID: 27217095

To the Editor

An absence of evidence-based guidelines for the management of commonly encountered infections is a significant barrier to better antibiotic stewardship in the long-term care (LTC) setting. Consequently, the peer-reviewed antimicrobial treatment algorithms developed by Dr. Zarowitz and colleagues as part of Omnicare’s Geriatric Pharmaceutical Care Guidelines that were recently published in JAMDA1 represent a potentially important contribution to the field.

Nevertheless, we are concerned by the authors’ decision to include cloudy, foul-smelling urine as an indicator of urinary tract infection (UTI) in their algorithms (Figure 1). While there is evidence to support dysuria, frequency and lower abdominal pain as symptoms of a UTI, evidence to support foul or cloudy urine as signs of infection are lacking. There are many potential causes of change in urine characteristics including hydration status, food recently consumed, and medications. In fact, there is evidence from a clinical trial that smell fails the sniff test.2 Midthun and colleagues conducted a study in which two research assistants with nursing home experience evaluated freshly voided urine for the presence of odor. The results of the “sniff” test were compared to urine analysis and culture results. The positive predictive value of odor was 54% for bacteriuria and only 28% for situations in which pyuria was present with bacteriuria. It is notable that the original Loeb Criteria 3 as well as a subsequent modification of these criteria 4 and recently updated surveillance definitions 5 explicitly excludes cloudy, foul-smelling urine as an indicator of UTI.

While the diagnosis of a UTI should be made on clinical grounds, there is compelling evidence that urine culture results have an inordinate influence on antibiotic decision-making in LTC facilities. Consequently, it is critical that urine cultures only be ordered when there is a sufficient pre-test probability of UTI. The authors’ recommendation to test and treat LTC residents exhibiting cloudy, foul-smelling urine would seem to run counter to this principal and, we feel, promotes over-testing and over-treatment that could have the unintended consequence of increasing antibiotic resistance and Clostridium difficile.6 We respectfully suggest the authors revise their algorithm to remove cloudy, foul-smelling urine as an indicator of UTI.

Acknowledgments

The authors report support for this work in part through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ R18 HS023799-01 (DAN, CJC); R18 HS022465-01 A1 (DAN, CJC); and HHSA29020100008I (CJC)], the Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center [NIH P30 AG024827 (DAN)], the State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services (CJC), the Cleveland VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (RLPJ).

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Jump discloses a research grant from Pfizer (RLPJ). Drs. Nace and Jump Co-Chair AMDA: The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine’s Infections Advisory Committee (AMDA). The opinions contained herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the committee or AMDA. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this letter.

References

  • 1.Zarowitz BJ, Allen C, Tangalos E, Ouslander JG. Algorithms Promoting Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long-Term Care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(2):173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Midthun SJ, Paur R, Lindseth G. Urinary tract infections: Does smell really tell? J Gerontological Nursing. 2004;30(6):4–9. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20040601-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Loeb M, Bentley DW, Bradley S, et al. Development of minimum criteria for the initiation of antibiotics in residents of long-term care facilities: Results of a consensus conference. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22(2):120–124. doi: 10.1086/501875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loeb M, Brazil K, Lohfeld L, et al. Effect of a multifaceted intervention on number of antimicrobial prescriptions for suspected urinary tract infections in residents of nursing homes: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;331:669. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38602.586343.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stone ND, Ashraf MS, Calder J, et al. Surveillance definitions of infections inlong term care facilities: Revisiting the McGeer criteria. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33:965–977. doi: 10.1086/667743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nace DA, Drinka PJ, Crnich CJ. Clinical uncertainties in the approach to long term care residents with possible urinary tract infection. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES