Abstract
We analyzed 597 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) who presented transient ischemic attacks (TIA, n = 270) or ischemic stroke (IS, n = 327). Treatment included aspirin, oral anticoagulants, and cytoreductive drugs. The composite incidence of recurrent TIA and IS, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and cardiovascular (CV) death was 4.21 and 19.2%, respectively at one and five years after the index event, an estimate unexpectedly lower than reported in the general population. Patients tended to replicate the first clinical manifestation (hazard ratio, HR: 2.41 and 4.41 for recurrent TIA and IS, respectively); additional factors for recurrent TIA were previous TIA (HR: 3.40) and microvascular disturbances (HR: 2.30); for recurrent IS arterial hypertension (HR: 4.24) and IS occurrence after MPN diagnosis (HR: 4.47). CV mortality was predicted by age over 60 years (HR: 3.98), an index IS (HR: 3.61), and the occurrence of index events after MPN diagnosis (HR: 2.62). Cytoreductive therapy was a strong protective factor (HR: 0.24). The rate of major bleeding was similar to the general population (0.90 per 100 patient-years). In conclusion, the long-term clinical outcome after TIA and IS in MPN appears even more favorable than in the general population, suggesting an advantageous benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic and cytoreductive treatment.
Introduction
Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by clonal expansion of an abnormal haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell1 that harbours somatic gene mutations: JAK2 mutations define PV, while mutations of calreticulin (CALR) and thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) are specific to the majority of JAK2 un-mutated ET and PMF2.
The natural history of these disorders is marked by venous and arterial thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and a propensity to transform into myelofibrosis (MF) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)2. Arterial thrombosis accounts for approximately two thirds of all major thrombotic events and represents a major cause of mortality. In particular, ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) are most prevalent in comparison with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and peripheral artery occlusions3,4.
The incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events (ICVE) in MPN has been evaluated in a few studies. In a cohort of 1638 PV patients enrolled in the European Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP) study5 and in a recent large observational study, including 1545 patients with JAK2-mutated PV6, the incidence was 1.2 and 0.9 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Similar findings were reported in ET patients. In the PT-17 and in the ANA-HYDRET8 trials, the incidence of ICVE was 1.2 and 1.7 per 100 patient-years, respectively. These rates are approximately 10-fold higher than in the general population, where the incidence is estimated at 0.17 per 100 patient-years9.
Patients with MPN presenting with any type of venous and arterial thrombosis or with a previous history of cardiovascular (CV) events are labelled at high-risk for recurrences, and cytoreduction in addition to antithrombotic drugs is recommended to reduce the rate of recurrence10–12, although both the modalities of treatment and the effectiveness on prevention of recurrences have been scarcely explored. In a single retrospective study, recurrence after TIA/stroke in MPN was estimated at 1.18 per 100 patient-years13. This figure is even lower than in the general population in which the long-term incidence of recurrent IS varies from 2.0 to 3.0 per 100 patient-years14–17. Moreover, there is no controlled study assessing whether the incidence of major bleeding in MPN patients, eventually attributable to the use of antithrombotic drugs, is higher than in the general population owing the intrinsic bleeding characteristics of MPNs3.
Therefore, considering the scarcity of data on the benefit/risk ratio of prophylaxis of recurrence with antithrombotic and cytoreductive drugs after those life-threatening complications, we launched an international investigator-driven retrospective cohort study called the Preventing Ischaemic Stroke in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (PRISM) study with three purposes: to describe the clinical profile at presentation of TIA/IS in contemporary PV, ET, and PMF patients; to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes beyond the acute phase, also in comparison with the general, non-MPN population; and to refine the risk assessment for recurrences and CV mortality.
Patients and methods
Study patients
A retrospective cohort study was conducted across 22 sites of 5 countries in the European Union and Israel within the European Leukaemia Network (ELN) in patients with a diagnosis of MPN according to the WHO 2008 criteria, after approval of the ethic committees (ECs) (primary approval by the central EC of the coordinating centre was obtained on 12 May 2016).
The participants were asked to identify, among all patients with MPN, those who had suffered from TIA and IS in the period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. The index event had to be concurrent with, or in the 2 years before, MPN diagnosis, or occurring during the course of a previously diagnosed MPN disease.
Stroke was defined as an episode of acute neurological dysfunction caused by focal cerebral ischaemia, based on objective imaging techniques (computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging scan) and clinical evidence of cerebral focal ischemic injury based on symptoms of any duration. TIA was defined as a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain ischemia, presenting with a unilateral motor or sensory deficit, speech deficit, haemianopsia or monocular blindness, lasting less than 24 h and without evidence of acute infarction on neuroimaging. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke (both intra-parenchymal and subarachnoid haemorrhage), cerebral venous thrombosis, and iatrogenic stroke (i.e., strokes related to neuro-endovascular procedures or coronary angiography) were excluded. Two neurologists (VDL and BC) independently reviewed the diagnostic criteria employed to record TIA and IS patients.
Treatment in the acute phase was delivered by stroke specialists after consulting with haematologists who, after the acute event, took care of these patients during the follow-up.
Each centre reported patients’ information by data input into an electronic database developed to record all study data after de-identification of the patients with an alphanumeric code to protect personal privacy. For each patient, the following information was recorded: demographic data, WHO diagnosis, type of ICVE, method of objective diagnosis, presence of microvascular disturbances or constitutional symptoms, mutation status, the results of the laboratory investigation for inherited or acquired thrombophilia (that is, deficiency of antitrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, increased levels of factor VIII, hyperhomocysteinemia, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies), full blood count at diagnosis and at thrombosis, presence of CV risk factors (that is, history of previous thrombosis before the index event, smoking habit, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, diabetes, congestive heart failure) and risk factors for cardiogenic embolism or vascular embolism (that is, atrial fibrillation, patent foramen ovale, valvular heart disease, significant carotid artery stenosis). Microvascular disturbances included erythromelalgia, scintillating scotoma, pulsatile headache, dizziness, and tinnitus. Diagnosis of microvascular disturbances, as well as of TIA, was accepted only in the presence of unequivocal medical documentation.
Data regarding cytoreductive or antithrombotic treatment after index IS or TIA, duration of the treatment and reasons for discontinuation of the treatments were recorded. Finally, follow-up data concerning novel thrombotic events, bleeding complications, MPN haematologic evolution, and death were also recorded.
Outcomes after the index event
Recurrent IS was defined as a focal neurologic deficit of any duration with evidence at neuroimaging of brain ischemia located in an area not corresponding to the lesion(s) of the index stroke. Recurrent TIA was defined as a novel transient neurologic dysfunction (duration of less than 24 h) without evidence of infarction on brain imaging. Two neurologists (VDL and BC) independently reviewed and validated diagnoses of novel TIA and IS after the index event.
Other arterial or venous thrombotic events that occurred after the index event were recorded only if objectively documented. Arterial recurrences besides ICVE included AMI, unstable angina pectoris and peripheral arterial thrombosis. Objectively established deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the legs and pulmonary embolism (PE), DVT of the arm, occlusion of cerebral or abdominal veins, thrombosis of the great saphenous vein of the leg objectively diagnosed with ultrasonography, and retinal vein thrombosis were also computed after the index TIA/IS.
Major bleeding was defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis18 and included fatal events or events occurring in a critical area such as an intracranial, intra-spinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular event. Bleeding was also defined as major when it occurred in non-critical areas (epistaxis, others) and was associated with a reduction of ≥2 g/dL in the haemoglobin concentration and/or necessitated transfusion of ≥2 blood units. MPN evolution into MF and/or AML was diagnosed according to the current guidelines10–12.
Statistical methods
For continuous variables, the median and the 5th–95th percentiles or range are provided and non-parametric tests for the difference in medians between groups were performed. Categorical variables were summarized by counts and percentages, and groups were compared with a Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. The annual incidence rate of any event that occurred during the follow-up was calculated by dividing the number of events by the total number of patient-years.
A composite CV outcome was defined including TIA, non-fatal IS, non-fatal AMI, and CV death, whichever occurred first. The cumulative probability of experiencing a specific outcome during follow-up was estimated by the competing risks method19. With this approach, a subject was assumed to experience the outcome only once, and the overall incidence at a given time was split into the sum of the cause-specific cumulative incidences.
Finally, the Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between any potential risk factor and time of each outcome onset. Starting with all candidate variables (i.e., those listed in Table 1 as well as antithrombotic or cytoreductive treatment), backward selection was used to test whether the deletion or retention of each variable improved the model, repeating this process until no further improvement was possible. For all hypotheses tested, two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Table 1.
N | Index stroke (N = 327) | Index TIA (N = 270) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male/female—n (%) | 597 | 141/186 (43/57) | 105/165 (39/61) | 0.296 |
Age at index event—median (5th–95th percentile) | 597 | 69 (37–84) | 68.5 (40–83) | 0.970 |
MPN characteristics | ||||
MPN diagnosis—n (%) | 597 | 0.201 | ||
Polycythemia vera | 107 (33) | 77 (29) | ||
Essential thrombocythemia | 174 (53) | 163 (60) | ||
Myelofibrosis | 46 (14) | 30 (11) | ||
Mutational status—n (%) | 553 | 0.490 | ||
JAK2 mutation/exon 12 | 270 (89) | 211 (85) | ||
CALR mutation | 18 (6) | 21 (8) | ||
MPL mutation | 4 (1) | 6 (2) | ||
Triple negatives | 12 (4) | 11 (4) | ||
Data at index event | ||||
Imaging—n (%) | 578 | |||
Computed tomography scan | 203 (64) | 177 (68) | 0.236 | |
Magnetic resonance imaging scan | 116 (36) | 82 (32) | ||
Blood cells values—median (5th–95th percentile) | ||||
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 433 | 14.0 (10.4–17.9) | 14.2 (10–17.6) | 0.401 |
Hematocrit (%) | 418 | 43.0 (32.0–55.6) | 44.0 (34.0–54.0) | 0.238 |
White blood cells count (×109/L) | 440 | 9.1 (4.5–20.0) | 8.9 (5.0–17.1) | 0.387 |
Platelets count (×109/L) | 459 | 523 (204–1067) | 551 (255–1103) | 0.206 |
Index event heralding MPN diagnosisa—n (%) | 597 | 149 (46) | 101 (37) | 0.044 |
Index event after MPN diagnosis—n (%) | 178 (54) | 169 (63) | ||
Years from MPN diagnosis to index event—median (5th–95th percentile) | 347 | 4.37 (0.26–22.2) | 4.48 (0.35–16.3) | 0.958 |
Cardiovascular risk factors | ||||
History of remoteb arterial and/or venous thrombosis—n (%) | 597 | 76 (23) | 44 (16) | 0.035 |
History of remoteb cerebrovascular thrombosis—n (%) | 597 | 25 (8) | 16 (6) | 0.408 |
Active smoking | 597 | 82 (25) | 46 (17) | 0.017 |
Hypertension | 597 | 187 (57) | 140 (52) | 0.192 |
Dyslipidemia | 597 | 91 (28) | 55 (20) | 0.035 |
Diabetes | 597 | 38 (12) | 30 (11) | 0.845 |
Atrial fibrillation | 597 | 23 (7) | 10 (4) | 0.079 |
Other cardiogenic embolismsc | 597 | 42 (13) | 25 (9) | 0.167 |
Microvascular disturbancesd | 597 | 77 (24) | 83 (31) | 0.048 |
Presence of thrombophilia—n (%) | 238 | 54 (43) | 40 (36) | 0.307 |
Inherited thrombophiliae | 16 (13) | 13 (12) | 0.835 | |
Hyperhomocysteinemia | 30 (24) | 18 (16) | 0.155 | |
Antiphospholipid antibodiesf | 13 (10) | 12 (11) | 0.885 |
aIndex events (ischemic stroke and TIA) occurred within a maximum of two years before the diagnosis of MPN or as heralding manifestation of MPN
bAnamnestic thrombosis occurred two years or more before the diagnosis of MPN
cOther embolisms or cardiogenic embolisms include patent foramen ovale, valvular heart disease (mitral stenosis, artificial valves), significant carotid artery stenosis, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease
dMicrovascular disturbances include erythromelalgia, scintillating scotoma, pulsatile headache, dizziness, and tinnitus
eInherited thrombophilia includes deficiency of antitrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, increased levels of factor VIII
fAntiphospholipid antibodies include lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies
Results
Clinical and laboratory features of the cohort
The initial cohort suitable for the study consisted of 5102 MPN patients diagnosed from January 2005 through December 2015. Out of 615 patients recorded by centres, 18 were excluded: two with hemorrhagic stroke, and 16 with TIA or IS not considered as MPN-related because occurred before 2 years preceding the diagnosis of MPN, leaving a total of 597 MPN patients with documented TIA (n = 270) or IS (n = 327).
The majority were over 60 years of age at the time of the index event; the frequency of the JAK2 V617F mutation was 100% in PV patients and 82% and 76% in ET and PMF patients, respectively.
IS was documented more frequently than TIA at diagnosis, while TIA occurred in 63% of the cases during the course of MPN disease (Table 1). The distribution of PV, ET and PMF and baseline blood counts were similar in IS and TIA groups; patients with IS had more often a history of remote vascular events (more than 2 years before MPN diagnosis), active smoking, dyslipidaemia and atrial fibrillation, while TIA cases had a significantly higher history of microvascular disturbances (Table 1).
Even though thrombophilia had a similar occurrence in the two groups, a trend for a greater frequency of inherited abnormalities was seen in patients less than 40 years (25%) than in the other age categories (13% and 9% for age 40–60 years and over 60 years, respectively; p = 0.094).
Almost all patients received cytoreductive therapy (hydroxyurea in the large majority) and long-term treatment with low-dose aspirin particularly after TIA (p < 0.0001), while oral anticoagulants were more frequently prescribed after stroke (p < 0.0001) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Index stroke (N = 313a) | Index TIA (N = 264a) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Antithrombotic treatment | |||
None | 14 (4) | 10 (4) | 0.681 |
Antiplatelet agent | 247 (79) | 239 (91) | <0.0001 |
Single agent (ASA or other) | 235 (75) | 230 (87) | <0.0001 |
Double agent (ASA + other) | 12 (4) | 9 (3) | 0.786 |
Anticoagulant agent | 51 (16) | 14 (5) | <0.0001 |
VKA | 48 (15) | 13 (5) | <0.0001 |
DOAC | 3 (1) | 1 (<1) | 0.629 |
Heparin | 1 (<1) | 1 (<1) | 0.904 |
Cytoreductive treatment | |||
None | 32 (10) | 25 (9) | 0.762 |
Phlebotomy | 2 (<1) | 8 (3) | 0.049 |
Hydroxyurea | 248 (79) | 204 (77) | 0.569 |
Alone | 224 (72) | 193 (73) | 0.680 |
In combination | 24 (8) | 11 (4) | 0.079 |
Anagrelide | 3 (1) | 15 (6) | 0.001 |
Interferon | 11 (4) | 6 (2) | 0.380 |
Ruxolitinb | 5 (2) | 3 (1) | 0.733 |
Otherb | 12 (4) | 3 (1) | 0.063 |
Overall, 503 patients (87.2%) received either cytoreductive and antithrombotic treatments; 50 patients (8.7%) received only antithrombotic treatment (and no cytoreductive treatment), 17 patients (2.9%) received only cytoreductive treatment (and no antithrombotic treatment), and 7 patients (1.2%) received neither cytoreductive nor antithrombotic treatments
ASA acetylsalicylic acid, VKA vitamin K-antagonist, DOAC direct oral anticoagulant
aTwenty out of 597 patients (3%) have missing information on treatments after the index event
bOther cytoreductive treatment includes pipobroman, busulphan, P32
Single and composite CV outcomes
During a total follow-up time of 2347 years after the index event (median 4.2, range 0–11.9), 113 patients (18.9%) experienced an incident thrombosis, 76% in arterial and 24% in venous sites (Table 3). The incidence rates of overall de-novo thrombosis and recurrent ICVE were 4.81 (95% CI 3.91–5.78) and 2.59 (95% CI 1.98–3.33).
Table 3.
Index stroke (N = 327) | Index TIA (N = 270) | p-valuea | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events, n (%) | Patient-years | Incidence rate % pt-yrs (95% CI) | Events, n (%) | Patient-years | Incidence rate % pt-yrs (95% CI) | ||
Thrombotic events, n = 113 | 54 (17) | 1179 | 4.41 (3.36–5.79) | 59 (22) | 1168 | 4.97 (3.84–6.42) | 0.5350 |
Arterial thrombosis, n = 86 | 38 (12) | 1228 | 3.10 (2.25–4.25) | 48 (18) | 1199 | 3.92 (2.94–5.22) | 0.2814 |
Unstable angina pectoris | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | |||||
Acute myocardial infarction | 4 (1.2) | 1308 | 0.31 (0.11–0.82) | 10 (3.7) | 1350 | 0.67 (0.35–1.28) | 0.1982 |
TIA+ | 13 (4.0) | 1290 | 1.01 (0.59–1.74) | 29 (10.7) | 1243 | 2.33 (1.62–3.36) | 0.0098 |
Stroke+ | 15 (4.6) | 1291 | 1.6 (0.70–1.93) | 4 (1.5) | 1378 | 0.29 (0.11–0.77) | 0.0079 |
Peripheral artery thrombosis | 4 (1.2) | 4 (1.5) | |||||
Splenic infarction | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | |||||
+TIA + stroke, n = 61 | 28 (9) | 1255 | 2.23 (1.54–3.23) | 33 (12) | 1240 | 2.66 (1.89–3.74) | 0.4959 |
Venous thrombosis, n = 27 | 16 (5) | 1278 | 1.10 (0.65–1.85) | 11 (4) | 1349 | 0.82 (0.45–1.47) | 0.4709 |
DVT of the legs | 5 (1.5) | 7 (2.6) | |||||
DVT of the legs + PE | 3 (0.9) | 2 (0.7) | |||||
Pulmonary embolism | 2 (0.6) | 0 (0) | |||||
Superficial vein thrombosis | 2 (0.6) | 1 (0.4) | |||||
Hepatic vein thrombosis | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | |||||
Splanchnic vein thrombosis | 2 (0.6) | 0 (0) | |||||
Cerebral vein thrombosis | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | |||||
Retinal vein thrombosis | 0 (0) | 1 (0.4) | |||||
Major bleeding, n = 25 | 15 (5) | 1299 | 1.08 (0.64–1.82) | 10 (4) | 1355 | 0.74 (0.40–1.37) | 0.3681 |
Intracranial bleeding | 6 (1.8) | 2 (0.7) | |||||
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 3 (0.9) | 5 (1.9) | |||||
Other sites | 6 (1.8) | 3 (1.1) | |||||
Evolution to MF, n = 19 | 9 (3) | 1308 | 0.69 (0.36–1.32) | 10 (4) | 1356 | 0.66 (0.35–1.28) | 0.9407 |
Evolution to AML, n = 17 | 6 (2) | 1326 | 0.45 (0.20–1.01) | 11 (4) | 1380 | 0.80 (0.44–1.44) | 0.2713 |
Second neoplasia, n = 51 | 26 (8) | 1273 | 2.04 (1.39–3.00) | 25 (9) | 1341 | 1.79 (1.20–2.67) | 0.6435 |
Breast | 5 (1.5) | 5 (1.9) | |||||
Gastrointestinal/liver | 3 (0.9) | 5 (1.9) | |||||
Kidney | 0 (0) | 2 (0.7) | |||||
Lung | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | |||||
Lymphoma/CLL | 3 (0.9) | 2 (0.7) | |||||
Prostate/bladder | 5 (1.5) | 2 (0.4) | |||||
Skin | 4 (1.2) | 4 (1.5) | |||||
Other | 5 (1.5) | 4 (1.5) | |||||
Death, n = 102 | 61 (19) | 1327 | 4.37 (3.38–5.66) | 41 (15) | 1381 | 2.97 (2.19–4.03) | 0.0572 |
Cardiovascular | 26 (8.0) | 1327 | 1.73 (1.15–2.61) | 8 (3.0) | 1381 | 0.58 (0.29–1.16) | 0.0050 |
Infection | 4 (1.2) | 4 (1.5) | |||||
MF | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | |||||
AML | 6 (1.8) | 8 (3.0) | |||||
Second neoplasia | 4 (1.2) | 7 (2.6) | |||||
Hemorrhage | 0 (0) | 1 (0.4) | |||||
Unknown | 20 (18.7) | 12 (4.4) |
aTests for differences in incidence rates
The cumulative incidence of single and composite outcome is reported in Table 4. At one year, the cumulative incidence of the composite CV outcome was lower, though not significant, after TIA (4.21%) than after IS (7.14%) (p = 0.13), but the frequency resulted similar after 5 years (18.9 and 19.2%). The lower frequency of a composite outcome in the first year after TIA was due to the absence of incident cases of strokes and AMI, while recurrent TIA and AMI progressively increased at 5 years to 12% and 3.74% of patients, respectively. In contrast, after the index stroke, cerebral events including TIA and new IS occurred earlier and progressively increased. However, after 5 years, the two groups showed a similar cumulative incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular recurrences (13.2% and 12.3% after TIA and stroke, respectively), although the occurrence of the single outcome was different.
Table 4.
TIA % (95% CI) | Non-fatal stroke % (95% CI) | Non-fatal AMI % (95% CI) | CV mortality % (95% CI) | Composite CV outcomea % (95% CI) | Non-fatal venous thrombosis % (95% CI) | Overall mortality % (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index TIA | |||||||
30-day | 0.37 (0.05–2.61) | – | – | 0.37 (0.05–2.60) | 0.74 (0.19–2.93) | – | 0.37 (0.05–2.60) |
90-day | 1.49 (0.56–3.92) | – | – | 0.37 (0.05–2.60) | 1.86 (0.78–4.40) | – | 0.37 (0.05–2.60) |
6-month | 1.87 (0.78–4.44) | – | – | 0.75 (0.19–2.96) | 2.61 (1.25–5.40) | – | 1.13 (0.37–3.46) |
12-month | 3.48 (1.82–6.58) | – | – | 0.75 (0.19–2.96) | 4.21 (2.35–7.47) | 0.79(0.20–3.12) | 1.92 (0.80–4.56) |
24-month | 6.57 (4.07–10.5) | – | 2.65 (1.20–5.80) | 1.65 (0.62–4.35) | 10.80 (7.47–15.5) | 1.24 (0.40–3.80) | 5.38 (3.15–9.09) |
60-month | 12.0 (8.26–17.2) | 1.24 (0.31–4.95) | 3.74 (1.88–7.40) | 2.14 (0.89–5.08) | 18.9 (14.2–24.9) | 3.68 (1.74–7.73) | 10.0 (6.69–14.9) |
Index stroke | |||||||
30-day | – | 0.31 (0.04–2.20) | 0.32 (0.04–2.23) | 1.55 (0.65–3.68) | 2.17 (1.04–4.50) | 0.63 (0.16–2.51) | 1.55 (0.65–3.68) |
90-day | – | 0.96 (0.31–2.95) | 0.32 (0.04–2.23) | 2.18 (1.04–4.51) | 3.44 (1.92–6.12) | 1.61 (0.67–3.83) | 2.18 (1.04–4.51) |
6-month | 0.67 (0.17–2.65) | 0.96 (0.31–2.95) | 0.32 (0.04–2.23) | 2.50 (1.26–4.94) | 4.41 (2.64–7.34) | 1.94 (0.88–4.27) | 2.50 (1.26–4.94) |
12-month | 2.04 (0.92–4.49) | 2.03 (0.92–4.47) | 0.67 (0.17–2.64) | 2.50 (1.26–4.94) | 7.14 (4.75–10.6) | 1.94 (0.88–4.27) | 2.84 (1.49–5.40) |
24-month | 2.86 (1.44–5.66) | 3.61 (1.96–6.63) | 0.67 (0.17–2.64) | 3.64 (2.02–6.49) | 10.2 (7.23–14.3) | 2.76 (1.38–5.46) | 6.67 (4.29–10.3) |
60-month | 5.81 (3.32–10.1) | 6.52 (3.90–10.8) | 1.80 (0.65–4.91) | 7.18 (4.52–11.3) | 19.2 (14.6–25.0) | 4.60 (2.46–8.49) | 20.4 (15.4–26.6) |
TIA transient ischemic attack, AMI acute myocardial infarction, CV cardiovascular
aComposite CV outcome includes non fatal TIA, Stroke, AMI, and CV deaths, whichever occurs first
In TIA patients, recurrent TIA contributed to 63% of the composite CV outcome; in contrast, the single outcomes after IS (CV mortality, IS, and TIA) contributed equally to the estimate of the composite outcome; in particular, after 5 years, CV deaths were more frequent than after TIA (7.18 and 2.14% respectively, p = 0.011). Figure 1 offers a graphic representation of the cumulative incidence of the specific outcomes contributing to the composite CV outcome after the two index events.
Venous thrombosis showed a higher cumulative incidence in the first year after stroke than after TIA (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02 at 3 and 6 months, respectively), but these rates were similar after 5 years (3.68% and 4.60%, respectively).
The overall mortality after 1 year was comparable in the two groups (2.84% vs. 1.92%) and was due to CV complications in 88% after stroke and 39% after TIA. After 5 years, deaths for CV causes decreased to 35% after stroke and to 21% after TIA. Other causes of death were due to MF, acute leukaemia, solid tumour, infections, or haemorrhages (Table 3).
The significant variables associated with arterial events, identified by backward selection for each specific outcome starting from the full model including all explanatory variables, are presented in Fig. 2. Independent prognostic factors of incident recurrent TIA were a previous index TIA, history of remote TIA and microvascular disturbances. Likewise, new incident ISs were predicted by an index stroke, particularly occurring after MPN diagnosis. In the IS group, arterial hypertension emerged as an independent risk factor. Of note, cytoreductive treatment was a strong protective factor capable of reducing the risk of new IS in 76% of patients. The only prognostic risk factor for AMI was a prior history of remote arterial and venous thrombosis, while CV death was predicted by a previous index IS, age over 60 years, and by the index event occurring after MPN diagnosis.
Bleeding
Major bleeding occurred in 25 patients (4%), corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.9 per 100 patient-years (Table 5), with no difference between patients receiving antiplatelet drugs or oral anticoagulants. Of note, the eight cases experiencing cerebral bleeding were receiving single agent aspirin while no events in critical areas were seen in patients receiving oral anticoagulants. Among the risk factors, univariate analysis showed that age over 75 year was significantly associated with a risk of major haemorrhages (HR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.07–5.34, p = 0.035); however, in the multivariate model, corrected by the already mentioned risk factors, this effect was reduced to a trend (p = 0.074), while significant factors were the history of remote thrombosis (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.05–5.96, p = 0.038) and the thrombotic complications arising after MPN diagnosis (HR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.08–8.29, p = 0.035).
Table 5.
N (%) | Total, N = 597 % pts/year (95% CI) | Antiplatelet agents, n = 486 % pts/year (95% CI) | Anticoagulant agents, n = 65 % pts/year (95% CI) | p-valuea | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major bleeding | 25 (4) | 0.90 (0.61–1.35) | 0.94 (0.61–1.44) | 0.79 (0.20–3.16) | 0.980 |
CNS bleeding | 8 (1.3) | 0.30 (0.15–0.59) | 0.35 (0.18–0.70) | 0 (0) | 0.426 |
GI bleeding | 8 (1.3) | 0.26 (0.12–0.55) | 0.26 (0.12–0.59) | 0.40 (0.06–2.81) | 0.674 |
Muscle hematoma | 5 (0.8) | 0.19 (0.08–0.45) | 0.18 (0.07–0.47) | 0.39 (0.05–2.77) | 0.497 |
Epistaxis | 4 (0.6) | 0.15 (0.06–0.40) | 0.13 (0.04–0.41) | 0 (0) | 0.726 |
CNS cerebral nervous system, GI gastrointestinal
aTests for differences in incidence rate between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant agents groups
Discussion
The large cohort of MPN patients included in the PRISM study represents, to the best of our knowledge, the most updated and comprehensive clinical epidemiological picture of how patients with cerebrovascular ischemia are managed in specialized haematological centres. In this large cohort, we obtained for the first time an accurate and comprehensive picture of the history of incident recurrences, CV events, and death over long-term follow-up after the occurrence of an index TIA and IS.
At index TIA and IS presentation, patients had atrial fibrillation in a minority of cases (4 and 7%) compared with the general population (11–18% in TIA cases and 20–30% in IS cases, respectively)20–23; dyslipidemia and diabetes were also less frequent, accounting for approximately 50% of those found in non-MPN patients20–23. Therefore, the association of these comorbidities with TIA and IS events appears less evident in MPN than in non-MPN patients, suggesting that the condition of thrombophilia due to the underlying disease plays a major role via constitutive activation of the haemostatic system4. We underline the high frequency of JAK2V617F mutated patients in our cohort, confirming the significant influence of the JAK2V617F mutation in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in these clonal diseases4. Of interest, a great proportion of the patients presenting with an index TIA and IS had a prior history of microvascular disturbances underscoring their possible significance as predictors of major thrombosis in MPN24.
To prevent recurrences and CV mortality, the patients in this study had received aspirin, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants as recommended for the general population25, in addition to cytoreductive drugs according to the MPN treatment guidelines10–12.
At one year after the TIA index event, 51 outcomes (8 deaths from CV causes, 4 IS, 10 AMI, and 29 TIA), corresponding to a composite cumulative incidence of 4.21%. This compares favourably with a contemporary cohort of patients with TIA or minor stroke recruited from the general population, in which the composite outcome at one year was 6.2%22. However, in contrast to the general population, the single outcomes after TIA presented with a different incidence. It is remarkable that among patients with TIA, no IS occurred in the first 2 years and that strokes occurred after 5 years in only 1.24% of cases. These estimates are lower than in contemporary non-MPN patients with TIA, in whom strokes occurred in 4.4–5.1% of patients after 1 year14,15,22, and 12–13.2% after 5 years14,15. In contrast, while strokes were rare events, the cumulative incidence of new TIA episodes progressively increased year by year and reached a 12% incidence after 5 years, with a 10% overall mortality rate. On the other hand, after the index IS, new strokes occurred with a cumulative incidence lower than in the general population: after 1 and 5 years, it was 2.03 and 6.52% vs 11.1–12% and 26.4% of non-MPN patients, respectively16,23. As expected, in comparison with TIA, overall mortality after stroke was doubled (20.4%), due to CV causes in 35% of cases. As regards risk factors for recurrent events, TIA or IS patients tended to replicate the first manifestation (HR for recurrent TIA and recurrent IS 2.4 and 4.4, respectively); moreover recurrent TIA was significantly anticipated by microvascular symptoms (HR 2.3), whereas recurrent stroke was associated with hypertension (HR 4.2). The use of cytoreductive drugs was a strong protective factor and decreased the rate of recurrent IS by 76%. Notably, the occurrence of the index events in the course of follow-up after diagnosis of MPN, in spite of antithrombotic prophylaxis and cytoreductive drugs, was identified as a strong prognostic factor for IS and CV death.
The different clinical course of recurrences after index TIA or IS could reflect a non-univocal pathogenesis of the two clinical phenotypes. We speculate that in TIA, there is a prominent role of haemostatic alterations characterized by an ongoing process of platelet activation, platelet aggregation and abnormal platelet-endothelial interactions, producing endothelial cell activation and transient damage in microvascular districts26–29. This haemostatic perturbance, when combined with hypertension, was found to be independently associated with recurrences in patients with IS, reflecting a condition leading to a higher frequency of more severe cerebral ischemic events.
An important outcome that should be evaluated after TIA and stroke is myocardial infarction. The frequency at 5 years of AMI was 3.74% and 1.80% in TIA and stroke, respectively, which are estimates comparable to the general population30. Finally, the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher after stroke in the first year, while at 5 years it was comparable after TIA and stroke (3.68% and 4.60%, respectively). This latter estimate is strikingly lower than that reported in a population-based study in which the cumulative incidence of VTE after stroke was as high as 15% at 3 months after the event, with a subsequent slow increase up to approximately 40% at 5 years after a stroke31. All in all, the cumulative incidence of the composite outcome, including ICVE, AMI, and CV deaths, was the same (19%) at 5 years after both an index TIA and IS, even though the single outcomes were differently represented.
The limitations of our study are those of a retrospective observational study. Case ascertainment, however, was based on objective imaging in almost the totality of cases (97%) and confirmation of the diagnosis by experienced stroke clinicians who took care of the patients in the acute phase. The collection of the data was made by expert haematologists and every effort was made to minimize missing data and incomplete follow-up; as a result, no data concerning traditional CV risk factors were missing, and no patient was lost to follow-up. The patients were selected from an MPN database of over 5000 patients diagnosed by expert centres in the last decade, so that our results can be generalized to the overall contemporary population of the MPN patients.
At least three reasons may account for the inferior rate of CV complications after TIA or strokes in MPN compared to the general population: first, atrial fibrillation is recognized as a risk factor for recurrent ICVE32, and this condition was low in our patient population; second, we speculate about a better control and adherence to the prescribed drugs (antithrombotic, anti-hypertensive, statins, and antidiabetics) due to the more frequent follow-up visits needed to monitor chemotherapy; and third, we underline the antithrombotic efficacy of hydroxyurea on MPN-associated risk factors33,34. The antithrombotic effect of hydroxyurea may recognize additional mechanisms of action besides myelosuppression, including qualitative changes in leukocyte function, decreased expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, and enhanced nitric oxide generation35,36.
The favourable risk-benefit profile of therapy in the prevention of CV events was obtained without enhancing the risk of major bleeding, which had an incidence similar to the general population receiving long-term antiplatelet secondary prophylaxis37.
Even though the recurrent events after TIA and stroke showed an inferior incidence compared to the non-MPN population, a residual risk of new TIA and strokes remained, and future studies should be designed to test new antithrombotic therapy and perhaps include new cytoreductive drugs.
However, the long-term observation of this cohort suggests some considerations that may have practical clinical relevance: (a) MPN patients with a previous ICVE are prone to recurrence including also other major CV events; (b) the observed advantage for recurrence when compared to the general population, is likely due to a strict adherence to the recommended treatment options for long-term treatment of MPN patients with thrombosis10–12, based on antithrombotic treatment, cytoreduction, and phlebotomies; (c) cytoreduction with hydroxyurea resulted particularly effective in patients with IS, who are at higher risk of CV death; (d) although the incidence of major bleeding was aligned with that expected in the general population under anticoagulants, a prudent use of aspirin may be suggested in patients with a previous long history of treatments for thrombosis and with age over 75 years, given the enhanced hemorrhagic risk37.
In conclusion, current antithrombotic therapy and cytoreductive drugs after an index TIA and stroke in MPN lead to a reduction of cardio-vascular recurrences and mortality in a remarkable proportion of patients, resulting even superior to that in the general population. Overall, the benefit-risk profile of treatment with antithrombotic treatment and cytoreduction in these neoplastic disorders appears favourable, but some categories of patients with TIA and stroke occurring after MPN diagnosis might require special strategies, to be assessed in future studies.
Acknowledgements
A.M.V. and T.B. were supported by a grant from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, Milano) “Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5 × 1000” to AGIMM (AIRC-Gruppo Italiano Malattie Mieloproliferative), project number #1005. A detailed description of the AGIMM project is available at http://www.progettoagimm.it.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Arber DA, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms: a contemporary review. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:97–105. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Patrono C, Rocca B, De Stefano V. Platelet activation and inhibition in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Blood. 2013;121:1701–1711. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-429134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barbui T, Finazzi G, Falanga A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and thrombosis. Blood. 2013;122:2176–2184. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-460154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barbui T, et al. In contemporary patients with polycythemia vera, rates of thrombosis and risk factors delineate a new clinical epidemiology. Blood. 2014;124:3021–3023. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-591610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marchioli R, et al. Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort of patients with polycythemia vera. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:2224–2232. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harrison CN, et al. Hydroxyurea compared with anagrelide in high-risk essential thrombocythemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:33–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gisslinger H, et al. Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: the ANAHYDRET Study, a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2013;121:1720–1728. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-443770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krishnamurthi RV, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob. Health. 2013;1:e259–e281. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barbui T, et al. Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:761–770. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.8436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vannucchi AM, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v85–v99. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tefferi A, Barbui T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2017;92:94–108. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Stefano V, et al. Recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: incidence, risk factors, and effect of treatments. Haematologica. 2008;93:372–380. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Wijk I, et al. Long-term survival and vascular event risk after transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: a cohort study. Lancet. 2005;365:2098–2104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66734-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weimar C, et al. Long-term mortality and risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack: a hospital-based cohort study. J. Neurol. 2009;256:639–644. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-0150-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mohan KM, et al. Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2011;42:1489–1494. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pennlert J, Eriksson M, Carlberg B, Wiklund PG. Long-term risk and predictors of recurrent stroke beyond the acute phase. Stroke. 2014;45:1839–1841. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schulman S, Kearon C. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005;3:692–694. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat. Med. 1999;8:695–706. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::AID-SIM60>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weimar C, et al. Etiology, duration, and prognosis of transient ischemic attacks: an analysis from the German Stroke Data Bank. Arch. Neurol. 2002;59:1584–1588. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.10.1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Buchwald F, Norrving B, Petersson J. Atrial fibrillation in transient ischemic attack versus ischemic stroke: A Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) Study. Stroke. 2016;47:2456–2461. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amarenco P, et al. One-year risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:1533–1542. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bergström L, et al. One-year incidence, time trends, and predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke in Sweden from 1998 to 2010: an observational study. Stroke. 2017;48:2046–2051. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.De Stefano V, et al. High rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and effect of prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists. Leukemia. 2016;30:2032–2038. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kernan WN, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–2236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Michiels JJ, Abels J, Steketee J, van Vliet HH, Vuzevski VD. Erythromelalgia caused by platelet-mediated arteriolar inflammation and thrombosis in thrombocythemia. Ann. Intern. Med. 1985;102:466–447. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Michiels JJ, et al. Platelet-mediated erythromelalgic, cerebral, ocular and coronary microvascular ischemic and thrombotic manifestations in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: a distinct aspirin-responsive and coumadin-resistant arterial thrombophilia. Platelets. 2006;17:528–544. doi: 10.1080/09537100600758677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Falanga A, Marchetti M, Vignoli A, Balducci D, Barbui T. Leukocyte-platelet interaction in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Exp. Hematol. 2005;33:523–530. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Falanga A, et al. V617F JAK-2 mutation in patients with essential thrombocythemia: relation to platelet, granulocyte, and plasma hemostatic and inflammatory molecules. Exp. Hematol. 2007;35:702–711. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.01.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Touzé E, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction and vascular death after transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2005;36:2748–2755. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190118.02275.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rinde LB, et al. Ischemic stroke and risk of venous thromboembolism in the general population: the Tromsø Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e004311. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Buchwald F., Norrving B. & Petersson J. Transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke patients with or without prior stroke. Acta Neurol. Scand. (2017). 10.1111/ane.12782. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Cortelazzo S, et al. Hydroxyurea for patients with essential thrombocythemia and a high risk of thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;332:1132–1136. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504273321704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barbui T. et al. A re-appraisal of the benefit-risk profile of hydroxyurea in polycythemia vera: a propensity-matched study. Am. J. Haematol. (2017). 10.1002/ajh.24851. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Maugeri N, et al. Inhibition of tissue factor expression by hydroxyurea in polymorphonuclear leukocytes from patients with myeloproliferative disorders: a new effect for an old drug? J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006;4:2593–2598. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cella G, et al. Nitric oxide derivatives and soluble plasma selectins in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;104:151–156. doi: 10.1160/TH09-09-0663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li L, Geraghty OC, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM, Oxford Vascular Study. Age-specific risks, severity, time course, and outcome of bleeding on long-term antiplatelet treatment after vascular events: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390:490–499. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30770-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]