Abstract
Diabetes is associated with an exaggerated platelet thrombotic response at sites of vascular injury. Biomechanical forces regulate platelet activation, although the impact of diabetes on this process remains ill-defined. Using a biomembrane force probe (BFP), we demonstrate that compressive force activates integrin αIIbβ3 on discoid diabetic platelets, increasing its association rate with immobilized fibrinogen. This compressive force-induced integrin activation is calcium and PI 3-kinase dependent, resulting in enhanced integrin affinity maturation and exaggerated shear-dependent platelet adhesion. Analysis of discoid platelet aggregation in the mesenteric circulation of mice confirmed that diabetes leads to a marked enhancement in the formation and stability of discoid platelet aggregates, via a mechanism that is not inhibited by therapeutic doses of aspirin and clopidogrel, but is eliminated by PI 3-kinase inhibition. These studies demonstrate the existence of a compression force sensing mechanism linked to αIIbβ3 adhesive function that leads to a distinct prothrombotic phenotype in diabetes.
Diabetes is associated with an increased thrombotic response, but the mechanism is unknown. Here the authors demonstrate that compressive force activates integrin αIIbβ3 on discoid diabetic platelets and that platelet aggregates can be eliminated by PI 3-kinase inhibition, but not by anti-thrombotics aspirin or clopidogrel.
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is becoming one of the major threats to human health and longevity in the 21st century. Based on current trends, children born after the year 2000 will have up to a 30% life-time risk of developing diabetes, leading to a 20–30% reduction in life expectancy1. Most individuals with diabetes die from the complications of cardiovascular diseases, particularly the acute coronary syndromes. Individuals with diabetes develop more widespread and advanced atherosclerotic lesions, and these plaques are more prone to rupture compared to non-diabetic individuals. Moreover, the thrombotic response at sites of atherosclerotic plaque rupture is typically exaggerated in diabetes, increasing the risk of vaso-occlusive thrombus formation, myocardial infarction and sudden death.
Platelets play a central role in the development of coronary disease by initiating and propagating plaque development, as well as promoting thrombus formation on the surface of disrupted plaques2. Platelets from individuals with diabetes are more reactive than platelets from non-diabetics, as evidenced by an increased response to soluble agonist stimulation3–5 along with enhanced adhesion and aggregation responses on thrombogenic surfaces6,7. They are also more effective at supporting blood coagulation and thrombin generation8. The mechanisms regulating platelet reactivity in diabetic patients are complex and not completely understood. Following stimulation, platelets from diabetic patients have elevated levels of cytosolic calcium9 and generate higher levels of thromboxane A2 (TxA2)10,11. Chronic hyperglycemia leads to non-enzymatic glycation of platelet membrane proteins12,13 and upregulation in the function of the platelet P2Y12 receptor14,15. Reduced intracellular levels of antioxidants16, enhanced formation of soluble advanced glycation end products (AGEs)17, oxidative inactivation of the SERCA2 Ca-ATPase18, as well as mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to alterations in platelet reactivity in diabetics19,20.
The clinical management of thrombosis risk for individuals with diabetes is complicated by the fact that platelets from diabetics are less responsive to the platelet inhibitory effects of the conventional antiplatelet agents, aspirin, and clopidogrel21. Despite the introduction of more potent P2Y12 antagonists, such as ticagrelor, diabetes remains associated with an elevated incidence of thromboembolic complications. Interestingly, integrin αIIbβ3 antagonists, the most potent class of antiplatelet agents, appear to work most effectively in diabetics22,23, indicating that dysregulation of integrin αIIbβ3 function is likely to be an important process underlying the diabetic prothrombotic phenotype.
The manner in which diabetes effects αIIbβ3 activation and the kinetics of thrombus growth remains ill-defined24. This is likely to be clinically important as diabetics are more likely to form stable vaso-occlusive thrombi that precipitate organ injury25. Experimental studies have demonstrated that the efficiency of thrombus growth in vivo is influenced by the interplay of two distinct, but complementary, platelet aggregation mechanisms26. The first involves a rheology-dependent (biomechanical) platelet aggregation mechanism that is primarily mediated by discoid platelets. This mechanism is important for the initial recruitment of platelets to sites of vascular injury, particularly under conditions of disturbed blood flow27. The second is a soluble agonist-dependent aggregation mechanism that stabilizes formed aggregates. The biomechanical platelet aggregation mechanism primarily involves discoid platelets in a low-activation state. Aggregation of these platelets is initiated by hemodynamic shear gradients and requires the co-operative adhesive function of the platelet receptors GPIb and integrin αIIbβ327. The second aggregation mechanism involves agonist-induced platelet activation that primarily serves to upregulate integrin αIIbβ3 adhesive function and stabilize platelet aggregates. As a consequence, developing thrombi exhibit a heterogeneous structure of platelets in various degrees of activation and stability, ranging from fully activated and degranulated platelets in the stable thrombus ‘core’, to minimally activated, weakly adherent discoid platelets in the dynamic thrombus outer ‘shell’26–28.
In this report, we have examined the impact of chronic hyperglycemia on platelet responses to biomechanical and agonist stimulation using a streptozotocin (STZ) murine model of diabetes. Surprisingly, chronic hyperglycemia for up to 10 weeks in the mouse, did not result in increased platelet sensitivity to soluble agonist stimulation in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, chronic hyperglycemia resulted in an enhancement in biomechanical αIIbβ3 activation, leading to a shear and red blood cell (RBC)-dependent increase in discoid platelet adhesion and aggregation in vitro and in vivo. Biomembrane force probe (BFP) analysis of platelet adhesion receptor–ligand kinetics at a single-platelet level indicates that in diabetics, increased sensitivity of platelets to shear forces is due in part to dysregulated integrin αIIbβ3 compression force sensing.
Results
Diabetes enhances discoid platelet aggregation in vivo
We initially investigated the impact of hyperglycemia on platelet adhesive function in vivo, using the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced mouse model of type 1 diabetes29,30. This model allows precise control over the onset of hyperglycemia and enables assessment of platelet function independent of the confounding effects of other cardiovascular risk factors or overt vascular disease30,31. Hyperglycemia (blood glucose levels of >15 mM) was confirmed 1 week post streptozotocin injection and in vivo thrombosis studies were performed on mice 7–10 weeks post streptozotocin injection. In initial studies, we investigated the impact of disturbed blood flow on the platelet aggregation response in diabetic mice using a needle in situ model of platelet thrombus formation32,33. In this model, the tip of a microinjector needle is inserted into the center of the lumen of a mesenteric vessel, creating a local region of flow disturbance (Fig. 1a). Discoid platelet aggregate formation was limited to the needle tip and did not occur at the site of endothelial needle injury, allowing examination of platelet responses independent of changes in the vessel wall. This feature provides a significant advantage, given that endothelial dysregulation in diabetes can promote platelet-vessel wall interactions. Notably, >95% of the platelets recruited in the needle in situ model displayed undetectable P-selectin surface expression by immunofluorescence staining, confirming that these platelets were in a low-activation state (Fig. 1b). Platelet aggregates forming in non-diabetic mice were dynamic and highly unstable (Supplementary Movie 1). Initial accrual of platelets to the needle tip occurred in a time-dependent fashion (Fig. 1c, 0–120 s) followed by subsequent loss of platelets from the outer shell, leading to a reduction in surface area over time (Fig. 1c, 120–240 s). Strikingly, in diabetic mice, both the rate and extent of discoid platelet aggregation were markedly increased compared to non-diabetic controls (Fig. 1b–d). These platelets remained in a low-activation state as they failed to express surface P-selectin (Fig. 1b). Analysis of the surface area of thrombi formed in diabetic mice revealed a 3- to 4-fold increase over a 4-min timeframe (Fig. 1c). A similar enhanced thrombotic response around the needle tip was also observed in the arterial circulation of diabetic mice (Fig. 1c). In control studies, we confirmed that discoid platelet aggregation was integrin αIIbβ3-dependent, as pretreating mice with the integrin αIIbβ3 antagonist, integrilin (4 mg kg−1), completely inhibited discoid platelet aggregation around the needle tip in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1).
Discoid platelet aggregates are stabilized by the generation of soluble agonists at sites of vascular injury26,27. Human diabetic platelets have enhanced responsiveness to soluble agonist stimulation, manifesting as increased rates of platelet aggregation at threshold levels of platelet stimulation34,35. To investigate whether mouse diabetic platelets had increased responsiveness to soluble agonist stimulation in vivo, we utilized an endothelial needle injury model of thrombosis, which perturbs, but does not denude, the endothelium at the site of injury and enables the local microinjection of soluble agonists at sites of thrombus formation36. Platelet activation in this model, prior to the injection of soluble agonists, is critically dependent on the generation of thrombin on the perturbed endothelium36,37. Interestingly, the initial recruitment and formation of platelet aggregates in this model were no different between control and diabetic mice (Fig. 1e). Moreover, when platelet activation was amplified by microinjecting thrombin (Fig. 1f) or ADP (Supplementary Fig. 2), there was no difference in the rate, extent or stability of thrombus growth between control and diabetic mice. Overall, these findings suggest that 7–10 weeks of hyperglycemia in the mouse has a major impact on discoid platelet aggregation, yet surprisingly, has limited impact on platelet responsiveness to soluble agonist stimulation in vivo.
Diabetes enhances αIIbβ3 dependent platelet adhesion in vivo
In addition to mediating platelet aggregation, integrin αIIbβ3 also promotes platelet-endothelial adhesive interactions in vivo38. This is mediated by the ICAM-1-dependent deposition of fibrinogen on the endothelial cell surface, which provides a reactive surface for platelet recruitment via integrin αIIbβ338,39. To investigate the impact of diabetes on platelet-endothelial adhesion, we established a mechanical endothelial injury model using micromanipulators and blunted microinjector needles (see Methods section and Supplementary Fig. 3a) that leads to the localized deposition of fibrinogen onto the surface of endothelial cells (Fig. 2a), which is dependent upon endothelial ICAM-1 binding (Fig. 2b). Subsequent platelet recruitment occurred exclusively at sites of fibrinogen deposition (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3b), and was integrin αIIbβ3 dependent, since it was completely inhibited by pretreating mice with integrilin (Fig. 2c). Most adherent platelets expressed undetectable levels of P-selectin (Fig. 2d) and retained a discoid morphology (Fig. 2e) in the first 10 min of adhesion, suggesting that most cells remained in a low-activation state. Platelets also readily adhered to sites of endothelial injury in STZ-treated mice and retained their discoid morphology; however, quantification of platelet numbers was difficult due to the rapid, confluent adhesion response and the propensity of diabetic platelets to form aggregates. To overcome this problem, we performed adoptive transfer experiments in which diabetic platelets were infused into a non-diabetic recipient mouse that underwent mechanical endothelial injury, enabling examination of diabetic platelet adhesive function in the context of a non-diabetic perturbed endothelium. In these studies, diabetic platelets were isolated, labeled with Alexa 488-anti-GPIbβ antibody (Ab), then infused into non-diabetic control mice at a ratio of 1/10 (infused/endogenous) with endogenous platelets labeled with DyLight 649-anti GPIbβ Ab (Methods section). Prior to injury, fluorescence imaging confirmed that the ratio of infused/endogenous platelets was comparable between the non-diabetic and diabetic platelet infusions (Fig. 2f, g). Following mechanical endothelial injury, both donor and endogenous platelets were deposited on the injured endothelium. Analysis of the ratio of donor vs. endogenous platelets revealed a twofold increase in diabetic donor platelet adhesion over the non-diabetic donor platelets (Fig. 2f, g), confirming that the enhanced platelet-endothelial interaction in diabetic mice is related to alterations in diabetic platelet adhesive function. These studies provide evidence that diabetes enhances the integrin αIIbβ3-dependent adhesive function of platelets in vivo.
Diabetes modulates shear selective αIIbβ3 adhesive function
To examine whether the shear–dependent interaction between platelet integrin αIIbβ3 and immobilized fibrinogen (FGN) was dysregulated by diabetes, whole blood was perfused over FGN matrices at both venous (600 s−1) and arterial (1200 s−1) shear rates. The number of diabetic platelets adherent to FGN was increased 2–3-fold relative to non-diabetic platelets (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 4), recapitulating our in vivo findings. Interestingly, this enhancement was shear-specific as there was no increase in diabetic platelet adhesion to immobilized FGN under static conditions (Fig. 3b). A similar shear-dependent increase in discoid platelet adhesion was also observed when blood was perfused over spread platelet monolayers at 1800 s−1 in the presence of inhibitors of ADP and TxA2 to prevent paracrine activation of tethering discoid platelets (Fig. 3c). These results indicate that diabetic platelets display enhanced adhesion under the both venous and arterial shear conditions (Fig. 3c).
The adhesion of discoid platelets to the spread platelets under high shear is dependent on the adhesion receptors GPIb and integrin αIIbβ340. To further define the receptors responsible for the enhanced platelet adhesion in diabetes, we perfused whole blood over vWF matrices at 600, 1800, and 5000 s−1. Significantly, the number of αIIbβ3 mediated stationary platelets was 2–3-fold higher than non-diabetic controls at all shear rates (Fig. 3d). In contrast, GPIb mediated platelet rolling was not significantly different (Fig. 3d). These data demonstrate that shear-enhanced adhesion of diabetic platelets is selective to integrin αIIbβ3, irrespective of its ligands, and occurs at both venous and arterial shear rates.
Analysis of the morphology of platelets stably adherent to fibrinogen confirmed that both non-diabetic and diabetic platelets retained their discoid morphology during the early stages of perfusion (Fig. 3e). Moreover, the enhanced adhesive response of discoid platelets seen in whole blood was recapitulated when washed diabetic platelets were reconstituted with either autologous diabetic RBCs or heterologous non-diabetic RBCs (without plasma) (Fig. 3f). This indicates that the hyperadhesive phenotype of diabetic platelets is intrinsic to platelets, rather than secondary to activating stimuli in plasma or due to the effects of diabetic RBCs41. Importantly, a similar enhancement in integrin αIIbβ3 mediated platelet adhesion to immobilized fibrinogen was also observed in human diabetic platelets. Perfusion of anticoagulated whole blood from patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 18, age range 20–64; mean age 47 years) over an immobilized fibrinogen matrix resulted in a twofold increase in platelet adhesion relative to non-diabetic healthy donors (Fig. 3g). These latter findings demonstrate that the shear-dependent increase in platelet-fibrinogen interactions is not species-specific, occurring in both human and mouse diabetic platelets.
To further investigate the possibility of a shear-selective increase in integrin αIIbβ3 adhesive function in diabetic platelets we examined soluble agonist stimulated integrin αIIbβ3 activation and platelet aggregation. In control studies, we confirmed that there were no significant differences in the basal levels of integrin αIIbβ3 expression and affinity in control and diabetic mouse platelets (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Moreover, soluble agonist-induced integrin αIIbβ3 activation and platelet aggregation were similar between control and diabetic mouse platelets (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5a,b). This was apparent with both the weak platelet agonist ADP and threshold concentrations of the more potent platelet agonist PAR4 activating peptide (PAR4-AP). Moreover, these platelet responses were identical from mice with either acute (1-week post STZ) or chronic hyperglycemia (7 weeks post STZ) (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Similar findings were apparent with platelet degranulation, in which α-granule exocytosis, as measured by P-selectin expression, was not significantly different between non-diabetic and diabetic platelets in response to PAR4-AP in either whole blood or isolated washed platelet assays (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5c). These studies confirm our in vivo findings, that persistent hyperglycemia for up to 10 weeks in the mouse does not markedly enhance agonist-induced platelet activation. Rather, they indicate that chronic hyperglycemia preferentially enhances the adhesive function of integrin αIIbβ3 under conditions of hemodynamic shear stress.
Table 1.
Agonist (µM) | Non-DM | DM | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Integrin αIIbβ3 expression | Untreated | 179.8 ± 4.52 | 203.3 ± 30.9 | NS |
Untreated (human) | 394.5 ± 24.6 | 488.2 ± 49.6 | NS | |
Integrin αIIbβ3 activation (JON/A binding) | Untreated | 5.67 ± 0.88 | 4.67 ± 0.67 | NS |
ADP (1) | 26.98 ± 1.21 | 27.57 ± 2.94 | NS | |
ADP (10) | 111.2 ± 15.8 | 102.7 ± 19.6 | NS | |
PAR-4 AP (100) | 14.67 ± 1.20 | 24.33 ± 5.23 | NS | |
PAR-4 AP (300) | 82.33 ± 3.71 | 71.33 ± 1.76 | NS | |
P-selectin expression | PAR-4 AP (100) | 27.57 ± 2.90 | 30.11 ± 4.82 | NS |
PAR-4 AP (300) | 50.48 ± 2.34 | 46.88 ± 4.69 | NS | |
P-selectin expression (isolated platelets) | PAR-4 AP (100) | 23.01 ± 2.17 | 28.22 ± 4.92 | NS |
PAR-4 AP (300) | 54.36 ± 5.55 | 49.19 ± 5.42 | NS | |
Aggregation (% maximal) | ADP (1) | 42.4 ± 1.4 | 41.6 ± 3.4 | NS |
ADP (10) | 59.3 ± 2.9 | 57.0 ± 10.0 | NS |
To assess integrin αIIbβ3 expression (Leo.F2 binding for mouse and HIP8 binding for human), activation (JON/A binding) and P-selectin expression in non-DM and DM platelets (mouse, if not stated otherwise), hirudinated whole blood (1/20 diluted, if not stated otherwise) or isolated washed platelets were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of ADP or PAR-4 activating peptide (PAR4-AP) for 10 min, in the presence of PE-JON/A Ab or FITC-anti-P-selectin Ab, respectively, then subjected to flow cytometry. Results are expressed as the geometric mean of fluorescence intensity. For platelet aggregation, platelet rich plasma from non-DM and DM mice were subjected to aggregometry using 1 or 10 µM ADP. Results are expressed as maximal extent of platelet aggregation (%). All results represent mean ± s.e.m. of n ≥ 3 independent mouse experiments. For human results, n = 16 for non-DMs and n = 18 for DMs. NS = not significant, p ≥ 0.05. assessed using an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Compression forces enhance αIIbβ3 ligand interactions
In our washed platelet and red blood cell (RBC) reconstitution assays we made the surprising observation that the shear-dependent increase in diabetic platelet adhesion was RBC-dependent. Perfusion of isolated mouse platelets over FGN in the absence of RBCs yielded comparable numbers of adherent diabetic and non-diabetic platelets (Fig. 4a). After reconstituting the diabetic mouse platelets with non-diabetic human RBCs, the hyperadhesive phenotype was rescued (Fig. 4b), demonstrating a critical role for RBCs in promoting the diabetic hyperadhesive phenotype. RBCs have a well-defined role in enhancing platelet transport to the vessel wall (margination)42,43 and recent rheological and modeling studies demonstrated that RBCs push and subject platelets to collision forces (compression)44,45, although how compression forces influence platelet adhesive function remains largely unknown. To address this, we developed a novel compression assay using a biomembrane force probe (BFP). The probe bead was functionalized with FGN (Fig. 4c) and driven to repetitively touch a discoid platelet aspirated by another micropipette with a controlled compressive force (fc). If a bond connects the bead and platelet during their separation, the RBC would be stretched and report a tensile force (Fig. 4d). The intermittent “touch and retract” cycles mimic-specific aspects of the platelet ‘stop-and-go’ adhesive behavior under flow46,47. The adhesion frequencies (Pa = the number of productive touches divided by the number of 50 total touches) reflect the likelihood to find a receptor–ligand bond or bonds at the time of detection. To examine RBC-platelet collision effect, we measured the platelet adhesion frequencies with various compressive forces ranging from 5 to 40 pN. Interestingly, the adhesion frequency Pa was found to increase with the compressive force fc (Fig. 4e). This effect was integrin-specific, since replacing FGN with BSA on the BFP eliminated the adhesion frequencies at all forces tested (Fig. 4f). Moreover, vWF-A1 binding to GPIb was not compressive force dependent throughout the force ranges tested (Fig. 4f), suggesting that the increased integrin adhesion frequency with compressive force cannot be explained solely by an increase in the bead-platelet contact area48.
Notably, platelets from diabetics were more responsive to compressive force than from non-diabetics, manifesting as a differential adhesion frequency that commenced at a threshold compressive force of 15 pN, progressively increasing with fc, and reaching a maximum (twofold increase) at saturating forces of fc > 20 pN (Fig. 4e). Again, replacing the FGN with BSA on the BFP eliminated the adhesion frequencies at all forces tested (Fig. 4f). Moreover, the enhancing effects of diabetes on compression force sensing appeared αIIbβ3-selective, as there was no difference in vWF-A1–GPIb-specific binding at any compressive force applied to control or diabetic platelets (Fig. 4f). Thus, the integrin-mediated diabetic hyperadhesive phenotype observed in microslide perfusion experiments can be recapitulated using the BFP adhesion frequency assay, while also allowing precise control of the compressive force. This suggests that amplifying αIIbβ3 integrin-dependent adhesion in response to compressive force represents a mechanism for diabetes to enhance platelet adhesion.
Compressive forces enhance αIIbβ3 on rate in diabetic platelets
To identify which biophysical properties of the molecular interaction of diabetic integrin αIIbβ3 are impacted by compressive force, we measured the 2D kinetics of the FGN–αIIbβ3 integrin interaction on both control and diabetic mouse platelets at compression forces fc = 10, 20, and 30 pN. Strikingly, integrin αIIbβ3 on diabetic platelets displayed a significantly enhanced adhesion frequency at 20 and 30 pN, but not 10 pN, compared with integrin αIIbβ3 on control platelets. The adhesion frequencies (Pa) were measured over a range of contact times (tc) and various compression forces (Supplementary Fig. 6). Fitting the Pa vs. tc curves with the single-step monomeric bimolecular interaction kinetics model returned the zero-force effective 2D kinetic on-/off-rates and affinity47,49. The BFP kinetic analysis revealed that diabetic platelets displayed a comparable 2D affinity to control platelets at fc = 10 pN; however, a 2–3-fold increase at 20 and 30 pN (Fig. 5a). Notably, this increase is mainly contributed by the on-rate (Fig. 5b) as the off-rate was not significantly different between non-diabetic and diabetic platelets (Fig. 5c). These kinetic analyses were consistent with the increased tethering of mouse diabetic platelets observed during perfusion of diabetic whole blood over a fibrinogen matrix (Fig. 5d). In order to confirm that these findings were not specific to the mouse model of diabetes, and further applied to all stages of diabetes, platelets from patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 7, age range 20–71; mean age = 35 yrs) were isolated and the adhesion frequency examined in an identical fashion using the BFP assay (fc = 20 pN). In accordance with results obtained from mouse platelets, FGN binding was enhanced in diabetic human platelets (Fig. 5e, left). Moreover, we also investigated a group of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 5, age range 7–18; mean age = 13 yrs) with more recent onset of diabetes and therefore less likelihood of overt vascular disease. Similar to adults with type 1 diabetes, this pediatric group also exhibited enhanced platelet adhesion frequency to FGN by at fc = 20 pN (Fig. 5e, right). These findings indicate that diabetes increases the compressive force sensitivity of platelets, thereby enhancing the kinetic association rates of FGN–αIIbβ3 integrin bonds and accelerating platelet recruitment under flow.
Compression force dependent activation of integrin αIIbβ3
We next asked whether the αIIbβ3 molecule was differentially activated on diabetic discoid platelets in response to compressive force to adopt an active conformation. Importantly no significant differences in the active conformation of αIIbβ3 on non-diabetic and diabetic platelets were observed by JON/A binding (a mAb specific to the active conformation of integrin αIIbβ3) in the absence of force using flow cytometry50 (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5a,b). Therefore, we combined the compression assay and a newly developed “switch assay” using a dual BFP setup51 (Fig. 6a lower). The aspirated platelet was first driven to touch 50 cycles with the FGN-bearing probe under a constant compressive force, and then switched to the second probe coated with JON/A (Fig. 6a). In sharp contrast to the force-free flow cytometry assay (Supplementary Fig. 5a,b), the above-threshold compressive force (fc = 20 pN), exerted via the FGN-bearing probe induced much higher level of JON/A binding to diabetic than control platelets (Fig. 6b). Importantly, platelets maintained their discoid morphology throughout the experiment indicating they remained in a low-activation state as observed in our in vivo thrombosis models and in vitro perfusion studies. The 3.2-fold higher adhesion frequency of JON/A to diabetic platelets translated into a 3.3-fold higher level of JON/A epitope exposure52. Interestingly, the below-threshold fc = 10 pN did not induce JON/A binding enhancement in diabetic platelets (Fig. 6b). These data indicate that compressive force on diabetic platelets induces αIIbβ3 activation. In contrast, stimulation by ADP resulted in much higher, but indistinguishable levels of JON/A adhesion frequencies to diabetic and non-diabetic platelets (Fig. 6b), suggesting that the enhanced integrin activation is specific to biomechanical stimulation rather than agonist stimulation.
To investigate the cumulative effect of compressive force over time, we performed a time-lapse adhesion frequency assay for a total of 100 repeated touches (at 2.5 s per cycle) on the BFP at fc = 20 pN. The adhesion frequency was estimated for every 10 consecutive touches and plotted vs. elapsed time (=2.5 s × cycle number). The FGN adhesion frequency to non-diabetic platelets fluctuated around the baseline, probably due to a small number of stochastic events. In sharp contrast, the initially slightly higher FGN adhesion frequency to diabetic platelets increased by ~2-fold within the first 125 s and by another 50% in the following 125 s (Fig. 6c). As expected, replacing FGN with vWF-A1 on the BFP probe abolished the time-dependent adhesion increase (Fig. 6d), thus confirming that the phenomenon is integrin specific. Matching our mouse studies, a similar accumulation of FGN binding enhancement over time was also observed in diabetic, but not in non-diabetic human platelets (Fig. 6e). These observations suggest that the compression force effect on integrin αIIbβ3 activation is cumulative in diabetic platelets.
The lack of compressive force effect on vWF–GPIb mediated adhesion on platelets from both diabetics and controls suggest that the differential FGN–integrin αIIbβ3 on-rate enhancement by compressive force in diabetic platelets is due to a biological rather than biophysical mechanism (e.g., a compression-induced enlargement of the contact area between the platelet and the probe bead). This assertion was also supported by the observation that the frequency of fibrinogen adhesion to purified integrin αIIbβ3 coated on a glass bead was not enhanced with increasing contact force (Supplementary Fig. 7). Moreover, the cumulative effect of compressive forces over time suggested that platelet activation may contribute to this process. Simultaneous calcium imaging in FGN perfusion experiments revealed that diabetic platelets displayed increased calcium signaling during platelet adhesion under shear (Fig. 6f), consistent with previous studies9. To test the hypothesis that the ligand binding on-rate enhancement of integrin αIIbβ3 by compressive force involves platelet signaling, we performed the BFP compression assay in the presence of 1 mM Mg2+/EGTA to chelate extracellular calcium. EGTA did not significantly affect FGN adhesion frequency to non-diabetic platelets but reduced the adhesion frequency of diabetic platelets to the level seen in non-diabetic controls (Fig. 6g). These data suggest that the compressive force-induced differential fibrinogen adhesion to diabetic platelets requires extracellular calcium influx to support signaling.
Compression force sensing activates integrin αIIbβ3
We have previously demonstrated an important role for PI 3-kinase (PI3K), especially the type 1 PI3Kβ isoform, in regulating integrin αIIbβ3 signaling and adhesive function under shear53. PI3K signaling has also been demonstrated to be dysregulated in diabetic platelets30. We therefore examined the effect of the PI3Kβ isoform selective inhibitor TGX221 in the BFP time-lapse adhesion frequency assay at a 20-pN compressive force. TGX221 suppressed the increment in the fibrinogen adhesion frequency observed in diabetic platelets after 50 s (Fig. 7a). Similar effects of PI3K inhibition in abrogating the enhanced adhesion of diabetic platelets to FGN under shear was observed with diabetic mouse platelets (Fig. 7b). Importantly, the effects of PI3K inhibition were confirmed in human diabetic platelets in both BFP and perfusion assays (Fig. 7a, b). These findings suggest that PI3K inhibition abolishes integrin affinity maturation by disrupting cumulative compression force sensing, and therefore inhibits integrin αIIbβ3-dependent enhanced diabetic platelet adhesion under shear.
To examine the impact of PI3Kβ on the exaggerated biomechanical thrombosis observed in diabetic mice in vivo, intravital needle in situ experiments were performed in mice treated with the PI3Kβ inhibitor TGX221. Notably, TGX221 treatment dramatically attenuated the rate and extent during the early phase of the discoid platelet aggregation (<60 s) in diabetic mice (Fig. 7c, d), with the aggregate surface area reduced by 80% at the peak growth time (60 s) (Fig. 7d). Furthermore, TGX221 treatment also reduced the stability of discoid platelet aggregates in diabetic mice (Fig. 7c, d and Supplementary Movie 2). Similar findings were also seen with PI3Kβ knockout (PI3Kβ−/−) mice rendered diabetic by streptozotocin injection (Fig. 7c, e and Supplementary Movie 2). In contrast, diabetic mice treated with the conventional anti-platelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel, demonstrated no detectable changes in the formation and stability of discoid platelet aggregates in this model (Fig. 7c, f and Supplementary Movie 2). Together, these data confirm a critical role for PI3K in the dysregulation of the integrin αIIbβ3 response to compressive force and the biomechanical adhesive function of discoid platelets.
Discussion
How integrin αIIbβ3 senses and responds to mechanical stimulation on platelets remains unclear, but is likely to be a fundamental issue in platelet biology given the central role played by this receptor in mediating platelet-endothelial and platelet–platelet interactions under the influence of hemodynamic forces. The studies presented here demonstrate the existence of a compression force sensing mechanism utilized by platelets to regulate the adhesive function of integrin αIIbβ3. This mechanosensing mechanism is operative in discoid platelets, triggered by a threshold level of applied compressive force, and requires intracellular signaling events linked to the activation of integrin αIIbβ3. Functionally, it is associated with the enhanced adhesion of discoid platelets to immobilized fibrinogen and vWF, and an exaggerated discoid platelet aggregation response in vivo. In contrast, agonist-induced increases in integrin αIIbβ3 affinity were no different between diabetic and non-diabetic mouse platelets. This surprising finding was mirrored in vivo, where microinjection of either ADP or thrombin was not associated with an exaggerated thrombotic response in diabetic mice. Significantly, dysregulated biomechanical αIIbβ3 activation is insensitive to the platelet inhibitory effects of aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists, but is highly sensitive to inhibitors of αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling, such as PI 3-kinase. These findings define a distinct diabetic prothrombotic mechanism linked to dysregulated biomechanical integrin αIIbβ3 activation that may partly explain resistance to oral antiplatelet therapies.
In contrast to tensile and shear forces, which are far more extensively studied in mechanobiology, the biological effects of compressive force and the mechanisms of its reception, transmission and transduction in cells is poorly defined. Our study has provided the first evidence demonstrating that compression force sensing by platelets alters the adhesive behavior of integrin receptors. Insight into this was first provided from our in vitro flow assays where a critical role for RBCs was identified to differentially enhance the adhesive phenotype of diabetic platelets. To date, most studies have suggested that the primary effect of RBCs is to increase platelet transport (margination) from the blood stream to the vessel wall, thereby enhancing the probability of platelets forming adhesive contacts42,44,45. Notably, most studies make a common assumption that adhesion receptors on the platelet surface do not undergo marked changes during the RBC-dependent platelet margination, which may not be the case. It is likely that RBCs increase platelet compression against ligand surfaces to enhance the formation of nascent adhesive contacts. However, the molecular insights underlying the RBC “compressive effects” have been difficult to study, largely due to the technical challenge of applying single-molecule nanotools to live cells as small and reactive as platelets. The recent advancements in the BFP assay have enabled investigation of the single-receptor mechanosensing behavior on the surface of live platelets54–56. Using the BFP, we have demonstrated that a threshold force is required to enhance αIIbβ3 engagement of immobilized fibrinogen and that the efficiency of adhesion was influenced by both the magnitude and repetitive nature of the applied compressive force.
Our use of repetitive compression cycles in the BFP assays is a reductionist approach to model platelet translocation dynamics, wherein individual platelets continuously form and break bonds. It is likely that translocating platelets experience continuous compression forces due to frequent collisions with RBCs in the bulk flow44,45. However, direct measurement of compression force on a platelet in free flow is technically challenging. For a platelet tethered to a surface by an adhesive contact at the rear end, we have performed a calculation as previously published57,58. For the venous to arterial shear rates studied in this report, γ = 600, 1800, and 5000 s−1, we estimated the compression forces fc = 11–24, 35–73, and 98–202 pN, respectively, relevant to those tested in the BFP experiments (see Supplementary Note). However, the precise relationship between the compression forces applied in our BFP assays and those experienced by platelets in vivo will be an important question for future investigation.
How compressive forces exerted on the platelet membrane leads to integrin αIIbβ3 activation will also be an important question for future studies but we postulate multiple potential mechanisms. The first possibility is in accordance with the force-through-lipid model which has been established for mechanosensitive ion channels i.e., MscL59. In this scenario, compressive force normal to the membrane is converted into tension in the membrane, which may trigger the opening of Ca2+ ion channels and induce integrin activation. This is consistent with our observation that chelating extracellular calcium abolished αIIbβ3–FGN adhesion enhancement on diabetic platelets. The second possibility may be related to the force-through-filament principle as the compressive force is sensed by the cytoskeleton rather than plasma membrane. In response to the external compressive force, the platelet cytoskeleton might undergo local remodeling, leading to integrin activation. Indeed, compressive force has been shown to alter the growth of branched actin-filaments at the leading edge of crawling cells60. Recent experimental and modeling studies have shown that integrin inside-out activation requires the cytoskeletal force to be transmitted through talin to the cytoplasmic tail of the β subunit61–63. An additional possibility may be related to the glycocalyx, a layer of glycoprotein–polysaccharide complex on the cell surface, since a recent study has demonstrated that local compression of the glycocalyx near integrin adhesive contacts promotes integrin clustering and focal adhesion maturation64.
The demonstration that chronic hyperglycemia in the mouse primarily resulted in a normal platelet response to agonist stimulation was surprising, since many biochemical changes associated with human diabetes can be recapitulated in rodent diabetes models31. Consistent with this, we have found dysregulated calcium flux and PI 3-kinase signaling in our STZ-diabetes mouse model, verifying previous findings9,30. The STZ-diabetes mouse model also exhibits other important diabetes-related pathogenic mechanisms, including increased oxidative stress and the generation of advanced glycation end products17. A previous study using the STZ model of diabetes has reported an enhanced platelet aggregatory response to low concentrations of ADP and PAR4-AP, in conjunction with augmented signaling processes downstream of their respective receptors30. The discrepancy between our findings and those by Stolla et al.30 are not immediately apparent, although presumably are related to methodological differences. The studies presented here were performed using mice with confirmed hyperglycemia of 7–10 weeks in duration, whereas the hyperglycaemic duration in studies by Stolla et al.30 was not specified. It is entirely possible that there may be mouse strain, as well as species-specific differences in platelet responsiveness to chronic hyperglycemia. It is also possible that exaggerated platelet responses in human platelets (particularly in type 2 diabetes) may occur at least in part as a result of additional cardiovascular risk factors, such as dyslipidemia and hypertension. An interesting possibility that warrants further investigation is whether the duration of hyperglycemia has a major influence on the sensitivity of platelets to mechanical or chemical stimuli. In this context, most studies in humans have employed subjects with chronic hyperglycemia over many months and years, so it will be important to investigate time-dependent changes in platelet reactivity soon after diabetes diagnosis, particularly in patients with type 1 diabetes. Nonetheless, our demonstration that dysregulated biomechanical integrin αIIbβ3 activation occurs in platelets from both STZ-treated mice and humans with type 1 diabetes, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors, suggests that this process is primarily induced by biochemical changes associated with chronic hyperglycemia.
How compressive force sensitivity relates to the many aspects of platelet hyperactivity and dysfunction reported in diabetes remains an important issue for future investigation. Some of the platelet abnormalities in diabetes involve receptors or signaling pathways linked to platelet activation by soluble agonists, most notably TxA2 and ADP35 and collagen exposure34. This may partly explain the requirement for higher doses of aspirin or clopidogrel to reduce thrombosis risk in diabetes21. Our demonstration of dysregulated biomechanical integrin αIIbβ3 activation in diabetic platelets may have direct clinical relevance, since it may partly explain the effectiveness of integrin αIIbβ3 antagonists in diabetic individuals. Our findings from multiple distinct experimental approaches, including the calcium flux assay under shear, BFP time-lapse adhesion assay and FGN-to-JON/A ‘switch’ assay are consistent with the possibility that integrin downstream signaling is dysregulated in diabetic platelets, leading to an exaggerated discoid platelet adhesion response. In this regard, the lipid kinase PI3K, especially its β isoform, which is an important mediator of αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling has previously been demonstrated to play a key role in integrin αIIbβ3-dependent platelet adhesion53. Indeed, inhibition of PI3K markedly inhibits αIIbβ3 adhesion maturation and αIIbβ3-mediated platelet adhesion under shear. In contrast, PI3K does not appear to have a significant role in initiating αIIbβ3 activation following soluble agonist stimulation, but rather, sustains αIIbβ3 activation through regulation of Rap1b and AKT53,65. Furthermore, PI3K has been demonstrated in other cell types to play an important role in regulating the activation of integrin αvβ3 in response to biomechanical force66. Given the effectiveness of PI3K inhibition in preventing biomechanical platelet activation in diabetes, therapeutic targeting of integrin αIIbβ3 signaling pathways may represent an innovative approach to reduce the prothrombotic effects of diabetes.
Methods
Mouse strains
All procedures involving the use of mice for both in vitro and in vivo studies were approved by the Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct (AMREP) Animal Ethics Committee (Melbourne, Australia) (project # E/1068/2011/M and E/0856/2009/M), and the University of Sydney Animal Ethics Committee (Project # 2014/620). All C57BL/6J male mice were sourced from AMREP animal services or Australian BioResources (ABR, Moss Vale, NSW, Australia). The PI3Kβ-deficient (PI3Kβ−/−) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA).
Generation of mice with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Diabetes was induced in 6-week-old male C57BL/6J mice via daily intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, 55 mg kg−1) for 5 consecutive days67. Blood glucose levels were examined 1 week post STZ injection, and monitored during their maintenance and prior to experiments. Mice which had blood glucose levels >15 mM were considered diabetic. Diabetic mice 7–10 weeks post STZ injection were used in this study, unless indicated otherwise. Diabetes was also induced in 6-week-old male PI3Kβ−/− mice and hyperglycemia was confirmed using the same procedures.
Patients with diabetes
Blood was obtained from patients with type 1 diabetes from The Diabetic Clinic, Alfred Hospital (Melbourne, Australia) with the approval of the Alfred Health Ethics Committee (project # 388/11 and 409/14). Age and gender matched non-diabetic healthy donors were also recruited as controls. All participants were confirmed devoid of any anti-platelet medication for the preceding 2 weeks, and were moreover free from any history of bleeding disorder, anemia, renal impairment, and acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention (<30 days). Patients with type 2 diabetes were excluded from this study. The total number of participants enrolled in these studies included 24 diabetic patients (12 males, 12 females, age range 20–64 years old) and 24 non-diabetic healthy donors (12 males, 12 females, age range 33–57 years old).
Juvenile type 1 diabetic patients were recruited under the approval of the Emory University Ethics Committee (Protocol number H14444 at Georgia Tech and IRB00077577 at Emory University) and the studies on these patients were conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Blood was obtained from these patients in the Emory Children’s Center on the Emory University campus. All participants were aged between 7–19 years old, and did not have a history of bleeding disorder, anemia, renal impairment, and acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention (<30 days). All participants and their accompanying guardians were provided with a verbal explanation of the study. A verbal agreement and a signed consent form were respectively collected from the participants and accompanying guardians, stating that they agree for blood donation, and for the publication of the data collected using their blood. The participants in this cohort included 3 non-DM individuals (2 males, 1 female, age range 9–12 years old) and 5 DM patients (3 males, 2 females, age range 7–18 years old). In all cases, no fasting was requested prior to blood donation.
In vitro platelet adhesion under flow conditions
For perfusion studies using mouse whole blood, nitric acid-washed glass microslides (0.1 × 1.0 mm: height × width)(Vitrocom; Mountain Lakes, NJ, USA) were coated with fibrinogen (FGN; 100 μg mL−1) for 2 h at room temperature, or overnight at 4 °C, then blocked with 20 mg mL−1 BSA for 30 min. Hirudinated mouse whole blood was perfused through the FGN coated microslides at 600 s−1 for 5 min. Platelet adhesion was monitored using an inverted Leica DMIRB microscope and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy (×63, NA 1.2 water objective). Platelet adhesion was recorded using Micro-manager v1.4 for off-line analysis. For perfusion studies with human whole blood, mouse washed platelets or reconstituted blood, platelets were perfused through FGN-coated microslides (100 μg mL−1; 0.2 × 2.0 mm) at 200 or 300 s−1 for 5 min. For mouse blood perfusion studies using murine vWF matrix or spread platelet monolayers, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channels (0.3 × 0.1 mm (height)) were used68. To capture vWF, the bottom of PDMS device was coated with an anti-vWF antibody AB7356 (20 μg mL−1; Merck Millipore) for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated with mouse plasma for 2 h at room temperature to capture vWF69. After the BSA blockade for 0.5 h, the mouse blood was perfused through at preset shear rates (i.e., 600, 1800 and 5000 s−1). To mitigate the pre-activation effect of microfluidics on platelets, the hirudinated blood was pre-treated with amplification loop blockers (ALB): ADP receptor blockers MRS2179 (100 μM), 2-MeSAMP (10 μM), cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (10 μM).
Platelet adhesion was analysed off-line using ImageJ 1.50a (Fiji). Platelets were considered adherent if they remained attached to the matrix for at least 2 s. Platelets which moved <1 cell diameter in 10 s following tethering to the matrix were classified as stationary cells, and platelets that rolled (continuously or stop/start) over a 10-s period were considered rolling cells.
Biomembrane force probe compression assay
The BFP utilizes two micropipettes, one aspirating a RBC with a glass bead attached on the apex via biotin-streptavidin interaction to serve as a force transducer52,54,55. Its spring constant of kBFP = 0.15–0.3 pN nm−1 is determined by the aspiration pressure and the radii of the micropipette and the RBC-bead contact area47,70. The glass bead, also called “probe” bead, was coated with FGN, vWF-A1 or JON/A via maleimide-PEG3500-NHS (MW ~3500; JenKem, TX). The other micropipette aspirates a platelet and dives the platelet to contact the probe under a defined compressive force (fc = 5–40 pN) for a certain contact time (tc) (0.2 s by default, 0.1–5 s for affinity measurement) to allow bond formation. The platelet is then retracted at a constant speed (3.3 μm s−1) for bond detection. During the retraction phase, a bond formation is signified by a tensile force. Both compressive and tensile forces are measured by quantifying the RBC deformation, which is detected by the axial movement of the probe bead tracked by a high-speed camera. Each aspirated platelet is subjected to repetitive cycles (50 by default, 100 for time-lapse measurement) of touch with the probe bead, and the fraction of bond formation over the cycles was determined as adhesion frequency Pa.
To assess the kinetics of the bond formation, the aspirated platelet was allowed to contact the ligand coated bead for various durations, since the adhesion frequency Pa depends on the contact time (tc). The 2D zero-force cellular on-rate (mrmlAckon) and off-rate (koff) can be derived by fitting the Pa vs. tc curve with the model Pa = 1 − exp{−mrm1Ackon[1 − exp(−kofftc)]/koff}, where Ac is the contact area, assumed to be constant for a given compression force. The site densities of integrin αIIbβ3 (mr) on mouse platelets and fibrinogen (ml) on beads were measured as mr = 681 – 2098 µm−2 for non-DMs and 969–2262 µm−2 for DMs and ml = 90 µm−2, using a flow cytometry method with the Quantum™ FITC-5 MESF (555p, Premix) calibration beads from Bangs Laboratories (Fishers, IN, USA)47. The signals were detected by the FITC labeled anti-αIIbβ3 mAb (Leo.F2) from Emfret Analytics (Wurzburg, Germany) and the anti-fibrinogen γ chain mAb (LS-C418056) from LifeSpan BioSciences (Seattle, WA, USA), respectively. Then we divided the measured cellular on-rate parameters by these site density numbers to obtain the effective 2D on-rates (Ackon). The effective 2D affinity can be calculated from AcKa = Ackon/koff.
Of note, for adhesion frequency analysis to extract 2D kinetics, we made no claim on whether the measurements were done under the conditions of single molecular interactions. Such claim is not needed because at higher adhesion frequencies the measurements were not made under single bond conditions and because such conditions are not needed for our conclusions on affinity change and on-rate changes49. Moreover, the 2D kinetic rates we measured are on the condition that the integrins are NOT subject to tensile force. Whereas the platelets were subject to various compression forces. The changing integrin affinity is a biological response of the platelet that involves signaling.
Models of thrombosis in vivo
C57BL/6J control or diabetic male mice with a body weight of 18–25 g were subjected to various in vivo thrombosis models. All mice were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone (60 mg kg−1) or ketamine/xylazine (150/15 mg kg−1). The anesthetized mice were provided with oxygen (0.5 L min−1) via a mask during the entire experimental procedure.
Needle in situ model and intravital microscopy
Thrombi were induced in the mesenteric venules or arterioles of diabetic and non-diabetic mice using the needle in situ model33. Microinjector needles were fashioned using glass capillaries (GD-1, 50 mm; Narishige) with a micropipette puller (PC-10; Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) such that the needle tip had a diameter of 2–3 µm. The needle was inserted into the lumen of mesenteric vessels (100–200 µm in diameter), with the needle tip positioned ~20 µm from the base of the vessel using an Injectman micromanipulator (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Thrombus formation at the needle tip was monitored for 4 min under real-time DIC microscopy using an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope with a ×40 objective, and recorded via EM-CCD camera (QuantEM 512SC; Photometrics, Tucson, USA) for off-line analysis using Visiview software 2.1.4 (Visitron System GmbH, Germany). Thrombus surface area at the indicated times was determined using ImageJ software. To examine platelet P-selectin expression during thrombus formation, mice were preadministered DyLight 649-anti-GPIbβ Ab (100 µg kg−1) and Alexa 546-anti P-selectin Ab (50 µg kg−1). P-selectin expression and thrombus formation were monitored using Nikon A1R confocal intravital microscopy with a ×40 objective. Fluorescent images were captured using NIS software, Version 4 (Nikon, Japan). Where indicated, mice were pre-treated with the anti-platelet agents aspirin (oral, 200 mg kg−1) and clopidogrel (oral, 3 mg kg−1) or vehicle (Gum Arabic) 24 h and 2 h prior to experimentation. Mice were also treated with the PI3Kβ inhibitor TGX221 (2.5 mg kg−1) or vehicle (DMSO), 10 min prior to needle in situ thrombosis. To inhibit integrin αIIbβ3 ligand binding, mice were infused intravenously with integrilin (4 mg kg−1) via a carotid catheter every 15 min during the entire experimental period.
Needle injury thrombosis model
Thrombi were induced at sites of mesenteric venule injury via needle puncture33,37. Thrombi were created by repetitive puncture (×10) of the mesenteric venules using a needle that had a 2 µm tip and was controlled by an Injectman micromanipulator. Thrombus formation at sites of vessel injury was monitored using intravital DIC microscopy, and thrombus surface area determined using Image J. Where indicated, the thrombi were subjected to local microinjection of ADP (10 mM) or thrombin (100 U mL−1) by positioning the microinjector needle, ~40 µm upstream of the thrombi in the direction of blood flow. The agonist injection was carried out under a prespecified pressure (1000 kPa) and duration (1.5 s) for 10 times. Of note, the needle does not breach or denude the endothelium. The thrombin was only locally injected, 20–40 µm upstream of the thrombus, not to the entire venule, and the quantity injected was very small (0.14 nL). Local thrombin injection also served as a positive control for induction of P-selectin expression in the needle in situ thrombosis model presented in main Fig. 1b, right panel.
Mechanical crush injury of mesenteric venules
A microinjecter needle tip was blunted (30–50 μm) and positioned above the exposed mesenteric venule. The mesenteric venule was then crushed twice by the blunted needle using the Injectman micromanipulator. Platelet adhesion to the crushed endothelial area was monitored at real time using DIC microscopy. Where indicated, mice were systemically injected with anti-PECAM Ab (FITC, 0.2 mg kg−1), Alexa-488 Annexin V (0.1 mg kg−1), GPIbβ Ab (DyLight 649, 100 μg kg−1), or P-selectin Ab (Alexa 546, 50 μg kg−1) to monitor endothelial cells, endothelial cell death, platelet adhesion, and activation, respectively. In order to examine ICAM-1-depedent fibrinogen deposition to the crushed endothelium, mice were pre-injected with Alexa-488-fibrinogen (17 mg kg−1) in the absence or presence of the ICAM-1 blocking Ab (YN1, 200 μg per mouse). To assess αIIbβ3-dependent platelet adhesion, mice were injected with integrilin (4 mg kg−1) every 15 min Following crush injury, DIC, fluorescence and confocal intravital microscopies were performed as described under the ‘needle in situ’ thrombosis model. For platelet adoptive transfer studies, platelets were isolated from non-diabetic and diabetic donor mice, labeled with Alexa 488-anti-GPIbβ Ab, and resuspended in Tyrode’s buffer at a concentration of 1 × 109 mL−1. The recipient non-diabetic mice were sytemically administered DyLight 649-anti-GPIbβ Ab (100 μg kg−1) to label endogenous platelets, and then infused with donor platelets via inferior vena cava to achieve a donor/recipient ratio of 1/10. The mesenteric venules of the recipient mice were then subjected to mechanical crush injury. The adhesion of infused non-DM, and DM donor platelets and recipient endogenous platelets was monitored using confocal intravital microscopy, and images taken pre- and 10 min post-injury. The fluorescence intensity of the circulating endogenous and infused donor platelets pre-crush, and those adherent to the endothelium post-crush were quantified using ImageJ, and expressed as the ratio of donor over recipient platelets.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Miguel Cruz for reagents, along with Dr Fang Kong for assistance in the BFP instrumentation. We also thank Ms Jessica Maclean, Ms Katrina Ashworth, Dr Akiko Ono, Dr Roxane Darbousset, Dr Laura Norton, and Dr Mike CL Wu for technical assistance and helpful discussion. This work was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (APP1028564; APP1048574 - S.P.J.), the Australian Research Council (LE120100043 - S.P.J.), the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, USA (HL132019 and CA214354 – C.Z.), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Kanematsu research award, Diabetes Australia Research Trust grant G179720, Sydney Medical School early-career researcher kickstart grant—L.J. J.D.M was supported by a Wheaton Scholarship and CSL Behring Global Research Scholarship. S.A.-M was supported by Wheaton Scholarship. A.C.C. is a National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellow (100067). S.P.J. is an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow. L.J. is a National Heart Foundation of Australia postdoctoral fellow (101798).
Author contributions
L.J., J.D.M., and S.A.-D. contributed equally to the design and performance of experiments, data analysis, co-writing of the manuscript and preparation of figures. I.A. designed and performed in vivo thrombosis experiments and assisted with preparation of figures; Y.C. performed independent BFP experiments. L.L.T., S.M., B.C., and A.C.C. performed microslide blood perfusion experiments; E.I.F. and N.C. provided critical reagents including clinical samples; Y.Y. and S.M.S co-wrote the paper, prepared figures and co-supervised studies; C.Z. co-wrote the paper and co-supervised studies; M.C. co-wrote the paper; S.P.J. supervised the study, designed experiments and wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Lining Ju, James D. McFadyen, and Saheb Al-Daher.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Cheng Zhu and Shaun P. Jackson.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-03430-6.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Cheng Zhu, Email: cheng.zhu@bme.gatech.edu.
Shaun P. Jackson, Email: shaun.jackson@sydney.edu.au
References
- 1.Moreno PR, Fuster V. New aspects in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherothrombosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004;44:2293–2300. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson SP. Arterial thrombosis--insidious, unpredictable and deadly. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1423–1436. doi: 10.1038/nm.2515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sagel J, Colwell JA, Crook L, Laimins M. Increased platelet aggregation in early diabetus mellitus. Ann. Intern. Med. 1975;82:733–738. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-82-6-733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mandal S, Sarode R, Dash S, Dash RJ. Hyperaggregation of platelets detected by whole blood platelet aggregometry in newly diagnosed noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993;100:103–107. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/100.2.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Angiolillo DJ, et al. Platelet function profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease on combined aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Diabetes. 2005;54:2430–2435. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dittmar S, Polanowska-Grabowska R, Gear AR. Platelet adhesion to collagen under flow conditions in diabetes mellitus. Thromb. Res. 1994;74:273–283. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(94)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Knobler H, Savion N, Shenkman B, Kotev-Emeth S, Varon D. Shear-induced platelet adhesion and aggregation on subendothelium are increased in diabetic patients. Thromb. Res. 1998;90:181–190. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(98)00050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zumbach M, et al. Tissue factor antigen is elevated in patients with microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes. 1997;105:206–212. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1211753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Y, Woo V, Bose R. Platelet hyperactivity and abnormal Ca(2+) homeostasis in diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2001;280:H1480–H1489. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.4.H1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Halushka PV, Rogers RC, Loadholt CB, Colwell JA. Increased platelet thromboxane synthesis in diabetes mellitus. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1981;97:87–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davi G, et al. Thromboxane biosynthesis and platelet function in type II diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990;322:1769–1774. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006213222503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cohen I, Burk DL, Fullerton R, Veis A, Green D. Nonenzymatic glycation of platelet proteins in diabetic patients. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 1991;17:426–432. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1002649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kislinger T, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates inflammation and enhanced expression of tissue factor in vasculature of diabetic apolipoprotein E-null mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2001;21:905–910. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.21.6.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsuno H, et al. P2Y12 receptors play a significant role in the development of platelet microaggregation in patients with diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:920–927. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ueno M, et al. Functional profile of the platelet P2Y12 receptor signalling pathway in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Thromb. Haemost. 2011;105:730–732. doi: 10.1160/TH10-10-0652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tannous M, et al. Evidence for iNOS-dependent peroxynitrite production in diabetic platelets. Diabetologia. 1999;42:539–544. doi: 10.1007/s001250051192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhu W, Li W, Silverstein RL. Advanced glycation end products induce a prothrombotic phenotype in mice via interaction with platelet CD36. Blood. 2012;119:6136–6144. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-387506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Randriamboavonjy V, et al. Platelet sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase and mu-calpain activity are altered in type 2 diabetes mellitus and restored by rosiglitazone. Circulation. 2008;117:52–60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.719807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tang WH, et al. Aldose reductase-mediated phosphorylation of p53 leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and damage in diabetic platelets. Circulation. 2014;129:1598–1609. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee SH, et al. Inducing mitophagy in diabetic platelets protects against severe oxidative stress. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016;8:779–795. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201506046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Angiolillo DJ. Antiplatelet therapy in diabetes: efficacy and limitations of current treatment strategies and future directions. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:531–540. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roffi M, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce mortality in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2001;104:2767–2771. doi: 10.1161/hc4801.100029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lincoff AM. Important triad in cardiovascular medicine: diabetes, coronary intervention, and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Circulation. 2003;107:1556–1559. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000055653.52489.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McFadyen JD, Jackson SP. Differentiating haemostasis from thrombosis for therapeutic benefit. Thromb. Haemost. 2013;110:859–867. doi: 10.1160/TH13-05-0379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cade WT. Diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular diseases in the physical therapy setting. Phys. Ther. 2008;88:1322–1335. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jackson SP, Nesbitt WS, Westein E. Dynamics of platelet thrombus formation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2009;7:17–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nesbitt W, et al. A shear gradient–dependent platelet aggregation mechanism drives thrombus formation. Nat. Med. 2009;15:665–673. doi: 10.1038/nm.1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stalker TJ, et al. Hierarchical organization in the hemostatic response and its relationship to the platelet-signaling network. Blood. 2013;121:1875–1885. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-457739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Candido R, et al. Prevention of accelerated atherosclerosis by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2002;106:246–253. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000021122.63813.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stolla MC, Li D, Lu L, Woulfe DS. Enhanced platelet activity and thrombosis in a murine model of type I diabetes are partially insulin-like growth factor 1-dependent and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013;11:919–929. doi: 10.1111/jth.12170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Furman BL. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic models in mice and rats. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 2015;70:5 47 41–20. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.ph0547s70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schoenwaelder SM, et al. Bcl-xL-inhibitory BH3 mimetics can induce a transient thrombocytopathy that undermines the hemostatic function of platelets. Blood. 2011;118:1663–1674. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-347849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hughan SC, et al. Dok-2 adaptor protein regulates the shear-dependent adhesive function of platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:5051–5060. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.520148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tang WH, et al. Glucose and collagen regulate human platelet activity through aldose reductase induction of thromboxane. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:4462–4476. doi: 10.1172/JCI59291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Santilli F, Simeone P, Liani R, Davi G. Platelets and diabetes mellitus. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2015;120:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ghasemzadeh M, et al. The CXCR1/2 ligand NAP-2 promotes directed intravascular leukocyte migration through platelet thrombi. Blood. 2013;121:4555–4566. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-459636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kaplan ZS, et al. Thrombin-dependent intravascular leukocyte trafficking regulated by fibrin and the platelet receptors GPIb and PAR4. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7835. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Massberg S, et al. Fibrinogen deposition at the postischemic vessel wall promotes platelet adhesion during ischemia-reperfusion in vivo. Blood. 1999;94:3829–3838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bombeli T, Schwartz BR, Harlan JM. Adhesion of activated platelets to endothelial cells: evidence for a GPIIbIIIa-dependent bridging mechanism and novel roles for endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), alphavbeta3 integrin, and GPIbalpha. J. Exp. Med. 1998;187:329–339. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.3.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maxwell MJ, et al. Identification of a 2-stage platelet aggregation process mediating shear-dependent thrombus formation. Blood. 2007;109:566–576. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-028282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Litvinov RI, Weisel JW. Role of red blood cells in haemostasis and thrombosis. ISBT Sci. Ser. 2017;12:176–183. doi: 10.1111/voxs.12331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Walton BL, et al. Elevated hematocrit enhances platelet accumulation following vascular injury. Blood. 2017;129:2537–2546. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-746479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Turitto VT, Hall CL. Mechanical factors affecting hemostasis and thrombosis. Thromb. Res. 1998;92:S25–S31. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(98)00157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tovar-Lopez FJ, et al. An investigation on platelet transport during thrombus formation at micro-scale stenosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e74123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vahidkhah K, Diamond SL, Bagchi P. Hydrodynamic interaction between a platelet and an erythrocyte: effect of erythrocyte deformability, dynamics, and wall proximity. J. Biomech. Eng. 2013;135:51002. doi: 10.1115/1.4023522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen, Y. et al. Fluorescence biomembrane force probe: concurrent quantitation of receptor-ligand kinetics and binding-induced intracellular signaling on a single cell. J. Vis. Exp., 10.3791/52975 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Ju L, Chen Y, Rushdi MN, Chen W, Zhu C. Two-dimensional analysis of cross-junctional molecular interaction by force probes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017;1584:231–258. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6881-7_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Spillmann CM, Lomakina E, Waugh RE. Neutrophil adhesive contact dependence on impingement force. Biophys. J. 2004;87:4237–4245. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.031773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chesla S, Selvaraj P, Zhu C. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys. J. 1998;75:1553–1572. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74074-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bergmeier W, et al. Flow cytometric detection of activated mouse alphaIIbbeta3 with a novel monoclonal antibody. Cytometry. 2002;48:80–86. doi: 10.1002/cyto.10114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ju L, et al. Dual biomembrane force probe enables single-cell mechanical analysis of signal crosstalk between multiple molecular species. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13793-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ju L, et al. Von Willebrand factor-A1 domain binds platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha in multiple states with distinctive force-dependent dissociation kinetics. Thromb. Res. 2015;136:606–612. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jackson SP, et al. PI 3-kinase p110beta: a new target for antithrombotic therapy. Nat. Med. 2005;11:507–514. doi: 10.1038/nm1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ju L, Dong JF, Cruz MA, Zhu C. The N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain regulates the force-dependent binding of von Willebrand factor to platelet glycoprotein Ibα. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:32289–32301. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.504001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ju L. Cooperative unfolding of distinctive mechanoreceptor domains transduces force into signals. Elife. 2016;5:e15447. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ju L, Lou J, Chen Y, Li Z, Zhu C. Force-induced unfolding of leucine-rich repeats of glycoprotein Ibα strengthens ligand interaction. Biophys. J. 2015;109:1781–1784. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yago T, et al. Catch bonds govern adhesion through L-selectin at threshold shear. J. Cell Biol. 2004;166:913–923. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200403144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yago, T. et al. Platelet glycoprotein Ibα forms catch bonds with human WT vWF but not with type 2B von Willebrand disease vWF. J. Clin. Invest. (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Cox CD, Bavi N, Martinac B. Origin of the force: the force-from-lipids principle applied to piezo channels. Curr. Top. Membr. 2017;79:59–96. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctm.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chaudhuri O, Parekh SH, Fletcher DA. Reversible stress softening of actin networks. Nature. 2007;445:295–298. doi: 10.1038/nature05459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhu J, et al. The structure of a receptor with two associating transmembrane domains on the cell surface: integrin [alpha] IIb [beta] 3. Mol. Cell. 2009;34:234–249. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nordenfelt P, Elliott HL, Springer TA. Coordinated integrin activation by actin-dependent force during T-cell migration. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13119. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li J, Springer TA. Integrin extension enables ultrasensitive regulation by cytoskeletal force. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:4685–4690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704171114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Paszek MJ, et al. The cancer glycocalyx mechanically primes integrin-mediated growth and survival. Nature. 2014;511:319–325. doi: 10.1038/nature13535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schoenwaelder SM, et al. Identification of a unique co-operative phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling mechanism regulating integrin α IIbβ 3Adhesive function in platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:28648–28658. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704358200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Katsumi A, Naoe T, Matsushita T, Kaibuchi K, Schwartz MA. Integrin activation and matrix binding mediate cellular responses to mechanical stretch. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:16546–16549. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400455200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Szkudelski T. The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin action in B cells of the rat pancreas. Physiol. Res. 2001;50:537–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nesbitt WS, Tovar-Lopez FJ, Westein E, Harper IS, Jackson SP. A multimode-TIRFM and microfluidic technique to examine platelet adhesion dynamics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;1046:39–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-538-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mountford JK, et al. The class II PI 3-kinase, PI3KC2α, links platelet internal membrane structure to shear-dependent adhesive function. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6535. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Evans E, Ritchie K, Merkel R. Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. Biophys. J. 1995;68:2580–2587. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80441-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.