Abstract
The borylation of C-H bonds catalyzed by transition metals has been investigated extensively in the past two decades, but no iridium-catalyzed enantioselective borylation of C-H bonds has been reported. We report a set of transition metal-catalyzed enantioselective borylations of aromatic C-H bonds. This reaction relies on a set of newly developed iridium catalysts ligated by chiral quinolinyl oxazoline ligands. This process proceeds under mild conditions with good to excellent enantioselectivity, and the borylated products can be converted to enantioenriched derivatives containing new C-O, C-C, C-Cl, or C-Br bonds.
Keywords: asymmetric catalysis, C-H activation, chiral dinitrogen ligand, iridium, borylation
Enantioselective C-H Borylation
The first Ir-catalyzed enantioselective borylation of aromatic C-H bonds was developed with up to 98:2 er. The success of this reaction relies on a newly developed catalyst that derives from an iridium precursor and a chiral quinolinyl oxazoline ligand.

Arylboron compounds are important and versatile synthetic intermediates in organic synthesis that are widely used in drug discovery and material science.[1] Among various reactions that form C-B bonds, the direct borylation of aromatic C-H bonds catalyzed by transition metals is particularly valuable.[2], [3] The borylation occurs under mild conditions with high functional group compatibility. The reactions of arenes occur at the least sterically hindered aromatic C-H bond (Scheme 1a).[2d]
Scheme 1.

Transition metal-catalyzed borylation of aromatic C-H bonds.
To achieve selectivity that complements that of undirected borylation reactions, the borylations of C-H bonds have been conducted with arenes containing directing groups that coordinate to the transition metal catalyst (Scheme 1b).[2e, 4] However, most directing groups are difficult to remove after the introduction of the boryl group. To address this issue, our group developed silyl-directed borylations of C-H bonds (Scheme 1c).[5] The silyl directing group can be easily installed and removed or it can be used to create additional functionality at the position of the silyl substituent.
Although these undirected and directed borylations of C-H bonds are now commonly used, no iridium-catalyzed enantioselective borylation of C-H bonds has been reported.[6] The absence of such an enantioselective process can be traced to the type of catalyst typically used for the borylation of C-H bonds. The borylation of C-H bonds occurs under the mildest conditions with iridium catalysts containing planar bipyridine and phenanthroline ligands, which are achiral. The lack of steric demand and strong electron donation of these ligands are two properties that have been proposed to be crucial to the activity of these catalysts,[2d] so a chiral analog of such ligands should fit these requirements to achieve both reactivity and selectivity Rhodium complexes containing chiral bisphosphines catalyze the silylation of aryl C-H bonds and could be an alternative platform on which to develop enantioselective borylation,[7] but rhodium complexes with such bisphosphines have not been reported to catalyze the borylation of C-H bonds.
Recently, we described the preparation of a series of chiral pyridyl and quinolinyl oxazoline ligands.[8] Specific ligands in this class and an iridium precursor were shown to form complexes that catalyze the enantioselective silylation of C-H bonds.[9] Here, we show that a complex generated from an iridium precursor and a specific chiral quinolinyl oxazoline ligand catalyzes the enantioselective borylation of aromatic C-H bonds (Scheme 1d)[10] at or below room temperature with good to excellent enantioselectivity. The process occurs with the highest yield and enantioselectivity with a ligand related to, but distinct from, that for the enantioselective silylation, underscoring the importance of creating a modular library of ligands for this class of enantioselective reaction.
To identify a chiral catalyst for the enantioselective borylation of aromatic C-H bonds, the reaction of diarylmethylsilane 1a was studied. The silyl group in this substrate should direct the borylation to an ortho C-H bond on the arene, and the borylated product would contain a C-B bond and a C-Si bond that can be converted individually to distinct functionalities under the appropriate conditions. For this reaction, we first examined the combination of [Ir(cod)OMe]2 and a series of commercially available, C2-symmetric ligands, including bisphosphine ligand L1, tridentate nitrogen PyBOX ligand L2, bipyridine ligand L3 and BOX ligands L4 and L5. Complexes generated from these ligands were inactive as catalysts for the borylation reaction.
In contrast, when C1-symmetric ligands containing two nitrogen donors were used in the reaction, the reactivity was higher, and the enantioselectivity was measurable. For example, reactions conducted with the pyridinyl oxazoline ligand L6 formed the functionalized product in 37% yield, albeit with a low 54:46 er. The same reaction catalyzed by a combination of quinolinyl oxazoline L7 and [Ir(cod)OMe]2 formed the borylated product 2a in 64% yield with a higher 72:28 er.
Reactions conducted with ligands L8–L14 revealed the effect of the steric properties of the oxazoline ligand on enantioselectivity. Reactions conducted with L8 and L11 containing tert-butyl and cyclohexyl groups in the position of an isopropyl group in L7 afforded 2a with slightly higher enantioselectivity than those conducted with L7. However, the reactions catalyzed by complexes of the other ligands (L9, L10, and L12) containing smaller benzyl, phenyl, and even larger diphenylmethyl groups and with L13 containing geminal dimethyl substituents buttressing the isopropyl group occurred with lower enantioselectivity. The steric effect at the C8 position of the quinoline was also investigated. L14 containing a methyl group at the C8 position formed a catalyst that was less reactive and selective than L7. Thus, an increase in steric hindrance at the oxazoline ring and the 8-position of the quinoline ring without further changes to the structure did not significantly increase the enantioselectivity.
Reactions catalyzed by complexes of L15 containing an electron-donating OMe group and of L16 containing an electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group revealed the effect of the electronic properties of the quinoline ring. Complexes of these ligands catalyzed the borylation in yields that were comparable and enantioselectivity that was slightly lower than those of reactions catalyzed by complexes of L7. Thus, varying the electronic properties of the ligand also was not a path to higher enantioselectivity.
In contrast to varying the steric and electronic properties of the nitrogen heterocycles, fusion of an indane skeleton to the oxazoline ring (L17) led to catalysts that formed product 2a with a higher er of 85:15 and a yield of 62%. Although ligand L18 generated a more reactive and stereoselective catalyst than L17 during our recent study on iridium-catalyzed enantioselective silylation of aromatic C-H bonds, the yield and enantioselectivity of the borylation catalyzed by the Ir-L18 system were lower than those catalyzed by the Ir-L17 system. This result pointed to the importance of the quinoline ring in this class of ligand and illustrates the value of a library of ligands for which a small change in structure can lead to significant changes in reactivity and stereoselectivity.
After identifying a chiral ligand that generates an active and enantioselective catalyst, additional reaction parameters, including temperature, solvent, ratio of substrate 1a to B2pin2, and catalyst loading, were examined (see supporting information, Table S1). The enantioselectivity was higher (87:13 er) when the reaction was conducted at 0 °C than when conducted at room temperature (85:15 er) (Table S1, entry 1). The enantioselectivity was even higher (93:7 to 96:4 er) when the reaction was run in alkane or less polar ether solvents, but the yields were lower (35 to 62%) in these solvents than they were in THF (66%) (Table S1, entry 1–6). Thus, the reactions were run with a small excess of B2Pin2 (1.2 vs 1.0 equiv) and a slightly higher catalyst loading (3 mol % vs 2 mol %, Table 2, entries 7 and 8). With this stoichiometry in methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) solvent, the product 2a was obtained in 81% isolated yield with 96:4 er and less than 10% diborylated product.
Table 2.
Scope of the enantioselective borylation of aromatic C-H bonds.[a]
Yields of isolated products for reactions conducted on a 0.25 mmol or 0.10 mmol scale. The er values were determined by chiral HPLC. The absolute configuration was assigned by analogy (details see Supporting Information).
Because rhodium complexes containing phosphines also catalyze the borylation of aromatic C-H bonds,[3c, 4d] we tested various combinations of rhodium precursors and chiral phosphines as catalyst for the enantioselective borylation (for details, see Supporting Information). However, no conversion was observed for reactions conducted with any of the rhodium catalysts generated from [Rh(cod)Cl]2 and chiral bisphosphine ligands.
The scope of the borylation of diarylmethylsilane 1a under the conditions described above is shown in Table 2. The reaction occurred with high enantioselectivity with alkyl, aryl and alkoxy substituents on the aryl ring. For example, the reactions of unsubstituted 1a and the meta-substituted 1b–1f formed the corresponding products 2a-2f with excellent enantioselectivity (95:5 to 98:2 er). The reaction of meta-chloro 1g led to the corresponding product 2g in slightly lower enantioselectivity (85:15 er). For reasons we do not understand, the reaction of para-fluoro 1h formed product 2h with significantly low er (61:39 er). The reactions of substrates (1i–1l) containing alkyl, aryl, and silyl groups at the para position proceeded with moderate to good enantioselectivity. The presence of an ortho-substituent had a significant negative influence on the yield and enantioselectivity, suggesting that this substituent causes the substrate to adopt an unfavorable conformation. The enantioselectivity of the reaction of ortho-methyl-substituted 1n was lower than that of ortho-fluoro substituted 1m. Disubstituted substrates (1o–1q) also underwent borylation with high enantioselectivity. However, the reaction of naphthyl-substituted 1r formed product 2r with moderate enantioselectivity.
The enantioselective borylation occurs on larger scale as well as on small scale. The reaction of 1a on a 5 mmol scale (eq 1) formed 2a in 71% yield and 95:5 er with just 0.75% mol % catalyst instead of the 3 mol % of reactions on an 0.25 mmol scale.
To illustrate the utility of the reaction, we investigated transformations of the silyl and the boryl groups in compound 2a (Scheme 2). Silane 2a was transformed to silyl ether 3 in 75% yield in the presence of an iridium catalyst. Treatment of compound 3 with H2O2 and KHCO3, converted the silyl and boryl groups to hydroxyl groups. Other processes led to reaction exclusively at the C-B bond. Under Suzuki coupling conditions, the reaction of 3 formed product 5 from coupling at the C-B bond in 65% yield. Reaction of compound 3 with CuCl2 or CuBr2 led to conversion of the C-B bond to a C-Cl or C-Br bond, respectively. Under these conditions, the silyl ether hydrolyzed to the corresponding silanol, forming products 6 and 7 in 75% and 89% yields, respectively. Silanols have been studied in medicinal chemistry because the hydrogen-bonding abilities and acidity of silanols are higher than those of their carbon analogues.[11] No significant erosion of the enantiopurity of the products was observed during any of the transformations.
Scheme 2.

Versatile transformations of the borylated products
In summary, we have developed the first Ir-catalyzed enantioselective borylation of aromatic C-H bonds through a silyl-directed desymmetrization. The success of the reaction relies on the development of a catalyst derived from an iridium precursor and a chiral quinolinyl oxazoline ligand. The borylated products can be converted to a series of final products containing a series of different functional groups at the position of the aryl-boron bond. Further studies to elucidate the mechanism of the reaction and to expand the scope of the enantioselective borylation of C-H bonds are ongoing in our laboratory.
Supplementary Material
Table 1.
Evaluation of chiral ligands for the enantioselective borylation of a diarylmethylsilane.[a]
The yields refer to values obtained by 1H NMR spectroscopy with CH2Br2 as internal standard, and the er values were determined by chiral HPLC.
Acknowledgments
B.S. thanks the MSD Scholarship. B.S. and Z.J.S thank the MOST (2015CB856600 and 2013CB228102) and NSFC (Nos. 21332001 and 21431008) for support of work at Peking University. B.S. and J.F.H. thank the NIH (GM-11581201) for support of work at Berkeley.
Contributor Information
Dr. Bo Su, Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China. Department of Chemistry, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 (USA)
Dr. Tai-Gang Zhou, Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China
Pei-Lin Xu, Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Prof. Dr. Zhang-Jie Shi, Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China
Prof. Dr. John F. Hartwig, Department of Chemistry, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 (USA)
References
- 1.a) Hall DG. Boronic Acids: Preparation and Applications in Organic Synthesis and Medicine. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2005. [Google Scholar]; b) Miyaura N. Cross-Coupling Reactions: A Practical Guide. Vol. 219. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Nguyen P, Blom HP, Westcott SA, Taylor NJ, Marder TB. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:9329–9330. [Google Scholar]; b) Waltz KM, He X, Muhoro C, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:11357–11358. [Google Scholar]; c) Mkhalid IAI, Barnard JH, Marder TB, Murphy JM, Hartwig JF. Chem Rev. 2010;110:890–931. doi: 10.1021/cr900206p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Hartwig JF. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:1992–2002. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00156b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ros A, Fernandez R, Lassaletta JM. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:3229–3243. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60418g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a) Iverson CN, Smith MR. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:7696–7697. [Google Scholar]; b) Chen H, Schlecht S, Semple TC, Hartwig JF. Science. 2000;287:1995–1997. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Shimada S, Batsanov AS, Howard JAK, Marder TB. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:2168–2171. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2168::AID-ANIE2168>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Cho JY, Tse MK, Holmes D, Maleczka RE, Smith MR. Science. 2002;295:305–308. doi: 10.1126/science.1067074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Mazzacano TJ, Mankad NP. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:17258–17261. doi: 10.1021/ja408861p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Obligacion JV, Semproni SP, Chirik PJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:4133–4136. doi: 10.1021/ja500712z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Xu L, Ding S, Li P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:1822–1826. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Dombray T, Werncke CG, Jiang S, Grellier M, Vendier L, Bontemps S, Sortais JB, Sabo-Etienne S, Darcel C. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:4062–4065. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Furukawa T, Tobisu M, Chatani N. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:12211–12214. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b07677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Saito Y, Segawa Y, Itami K. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:5193–5198. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) Press LP, Kosanovich AJ, McCulloch BJ, Ozerov OV. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:9487–9497. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) Kawamorita S, Ohmiya H, Hara K, Fukuoka A, Sawamura M. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:5058–5059. doi: 10.1021/ja9008419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ishiyama T, Isou H, Kikuchi T, Miyaura N. Chem Commun. 2010;46:159–161. doi: 10.1039/b910298a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Dai HX, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;134:134–137. doi: 10.1021/ja2097095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kawamorita S, Miyazaki T, Ohmiya H, Iwai T, Sawamura M. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:19310–19313. doi: 10.1021/ja208364a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ros A, Estepa B, López-Rodríguez R, Álvarez E, Fernández R, Lassaletta JM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:11724–11728. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Roering AJ, Hale LVA, Squier PA, Ringgold MA, Wiederspan ER, Clark TB. Org Lett. 2012;14:3558–3561. doi: 10.1021/ol301635x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Roosen PC, Kallepalli VA, Chattopadhyay B, Singleton DA, Maleczka RE, Smith MR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:11350–11353. doi: 10.1021/ja303443m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Kuninobu Y, Iwanaga T, Omura T, Takai K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;125:4527–4530. doi: 10.1002/anie.201210328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Crawford KM, Ramseyer TR, Daley CJA, Clark TB. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:7589–7593. doi: 10.1002/anie.201402868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Ghaffari B, Preshlock SM, Plattner DL, Staples RJ, Maligres PE, Krska SW, Maleczka RE, Smith MR. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:14345–14348. doi: 10.1021/ja506229s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) Kuninobu Y, Ida H, Nishi M, Kanai M. Nat Chem. 2015;7:712–717. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l) Bisht R, Chattopadhyay B. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:84–87. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b11683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m) Wang G, Liu L, Wang H, Ding YS, Zhou J, Mao S, Li P. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;139:91–94. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Larsen MA, Cho SH, Hartwig J. J Am Chem Soc. 2016:762–765. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b12153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cho SH, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:8157–8160. doi: 10.1021/ja403462b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Robbins DW, Boebel TA, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4068–4069. doi: 10.1021/ja1006405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Boebel TA, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:7534–7535. doi: 10.1021/ja8015878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.While submitting our manuscript, Yu reported a Pd-catalyzed enantioselective borylation, see: He J, Shao Q, Wu Q, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:3344–3347. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b13389.
- 7.a) Kuninobu Y, Yamauchi K, Tamura N, Seiki T, Takai K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:1520–1522. doi: 10.1002/anie.201207723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lee T, Wilson TW, Berg R, Ryberg P, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:6742–6745. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Murai M, Matsumoto K, Takeuchi Y, Takai K. Org Lett. 2015;17:3102–3105. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zhang QW, An K, Liu LC, Yue Y, He W. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:6918–6921. doi: 10.1002/anie.201502548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Lee T, Hartwig JF. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:8723–8727. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Zhang QW, An K, Liu LC, Zhang Q, Guo H, He W. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:1125–1129. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Chelucci G, Sanna MG, Gladiali S. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:2889–2893. [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang Y, Sigman MS. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3076–3077. doi: 10.1021/ja070263u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Jensen KH, Pathak TP, Zhang Y, Sigman MS. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17074–17075. doi: 10.1021/ja909030c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kikushima K, Holder JC, Gatti M, Stoltz BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:6902–6905. doi: 10.1021/ja200664x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Perch NS, Widenhoefer RA. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:6960–6961. [Google Scholar]; f) McManus HA, Guiry PJ. Chem Rev. 2004;104:4151–4202. doi: 10.1021/cr040642v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Su B, Zhou T-G, Li X-W, Shao X-R, Xu P-L, Wu W-L, Hartwig JF, Shi Z-J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:1092–1096. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.For some selected examples of enantioselective C-H functionalization through desymmetrization, see: Shi BF, Maugel N, Zhang YH, Yu JQ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4882–4886. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801030.Shi BF, Zhang YH, Lam JK, Wang DH, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:460–461. doi: 10.1021/ja909571z.Chu L, Wang XC, Moore CE, Rheingold AL, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:16344–16347. doi: 10.1021/ja408864c.Nakanishi M, Katayev D, Besnard C, Kündig EP. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:7438–7441. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102639.Albicker MR, Cramer N. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:9139–9142. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905060.Saget T, Lemouzy SJ, Cramer N. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:2238–2242. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108511.Lin ZQ, Wang WZ, Yan SB, Duan WL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:6265–6269. doi: 10.1002/anie.201500201.Sun Y, Cramer N. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:364–367. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606637.
- 11.Franz AK, Wilson SO. J Med Chem. 2013;56:388–405. doi: 10.1021/jm3010114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


