Abstract
A widespread epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was reported in 2015 from South and Central America and the Caribbean. Although the full spectrum of ZIKV infection of the newborn has yet to be determined, other maternal viral infections resulting in transmission to the fetus provide instructive lessons that can be applied to the prospective evaluation of individuals with ZIKV infection. This review focuses on those other congenital infections, including rubella, congenital cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and neonatal herpes simplex virus, from which lessons for the evaluation of ZIKV in the newborn can be applied.
Keywords: Zika, congenital infections, rubella, hepatitis B, neonatal herpes simplex infection
A widespread epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was reported in 2015 from South and Central America and the Caribbean [1–3]. By December 2015, the Brazil Ministry of Health estimated >1000000 cases of ZIKV infection in adults [4, 5]. In September of the same year, clinicians began to identify an increased number of babies born with microcephaly in the same area in which ZIKV infection was detected [6–8]. This observation resulted in generalized concern for maternofetal transmission by ministries of health worldwide, including the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Brazil Ministry of Health. The possibility and, indeed, introduction of Zika-infected Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus to North America has heightened scientific investment by the US Department of Health and Human Services.
While the full spectrum of ZIKV infection of the newborn has yet to be determined, other maternal viral infections resulting in transmission to the fetus provide instructive lessons that can be applied to the prospective evaluation of individuals with ZIKV infection. These include rubella, congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections. Congenital rubella syndrome has virtually been eliminated from the developed world, following universal vaccination programs of young children. However, the remaining perinatal infections still are significant causes of morbidity and, in some cases, mortality. Likely, the most analogous infection is congenital CMV infection, which can produce profound effects on the fetus, including microcephaly, sensorineural hearing loss, chorioretinitis, and other neurologic defects. This review will focus on those other congenital infections from which lessons for the evaluation of ZIKV in the newborn can be applied. Parallels and differences will be noted.
RUBELLA
Primary rubella infection during pregnancy, particularly during the first trimester, represents a major risk for congenital infection via placental transmission [9]. The timing of maternal infection correlates with fetal outcome, with up to 85% of fetuses affected if primary infection occurs in the first 12 weeks of gestation [10]. Beyond the first trimester, the risk of transmission diminishes considerably, although congenital infection is still possible. Reinfection can occur in persons with a past history of natural rubella infection or in those who have been immunized; fetal transmission after maternal reinfection is rare [11].
Congenital rubella infection may result in fetal death or premature labor. Affected infants often have multiple serious birth defects (ie, congenital rubella syndrome [CRS]), including sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), cataracts, cardiovascular defects, microcephaly, neurodevelopmental impairment, intrauterine growth restriction, and thrombocytopenia. The classic CRS triad consists of cardiac, ophthalmic, and auditory sequelae. When transmission of infection occurs beyond the first trimester, adverse effects are less common, with SNHL being the most common sequela.
Prior to the implementation of effective vaccination programs, it is estimated that >100000 infants were born with CRS globally each year, mostly in developing countries [12]. Control of endemic rubella infection and CRS can occur through the use of live attenuated vaccines in all children during the second year of life to eradicate rubella from the community, therefore preventing infection in pregnant women. Whenever possible, women of childbearing age who are not immune to rubella should also be identified and immunized. In countries reporting to the World Health Organization (WHO), the introduction of rubella-containing childhood immunization schedules has led to a 95% decrease in rubella infections, from 670894 reported cases in 2000 to 33068 reported cases in 2014 [13]. Notably, the 2014 WHO surveillance data had a great number of countries reporting rubella compared to the 2000 data (162 vs 102 countries reporting, respectively). One hundred forty-one cases of CRS were reported to the WHO in 2014, although CRS cases are likely often underreported [13]. Elimination of CRS has proven to be an achievable goal in countries with appropriate vaccine uptake [14]. Importantly, universal vaccination to prevent rubella is a model by which fetal transmission of ZIKV can be prevented. Such vaccines are discussed elsewhere in this monograph.
CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION
Cytomegalovirus infections are ubiquitous in humans and are an important cause of congenital infection and a leading cause of SNHL worldwide [15–17]. It is estimated that, in the United States, between 20000 and 30000 newborns each year are infected with CMV. The number of infants with congenital CMV infection is actually much higher in developing countries because of the direct correlation with maternal CMV [15, 17, 18]. Unlike rubella, toxoplasmosis, and, apparently, Zika where intrauterine transmission occurs as a result of maternal infection acquired during pregnancy (primary infection), congenital CMV infection can occur in infants born to mothers who have had CMV infection prior to pregnancy (nonprimary infection) [19–25]. In fact, congenital CMV infection following a nonprimary maternal infection accounts for two-thirds to three-quarters of all congenital CMV infections in highly seroimmune populations [22–29]. Young maternal age and non-Hispanic black race have been associated with increased risk of congenital CMV infection [17, 30–35]. The argument that maternal immunity to CMV limits intrauterine transmission is supported by the finding that the rate of intrauterine infection in women with preexisting CMV immunity (nonprimary maternal infection) is about 1%–1.5%, which is about 20- to 30-fold less than in women with primary CMV infection during pregnancy [15, 20, 26, 36, 37]. However, the number of women undergoing primary CMV infections during pregnancy is considerably smaller than the number with nonprimary infections, especially in highly seropositive populations. In populations with near-universal seroimmunity, it is likely that most infants with congenital CMV infection are born to women with nonprimary infection [26, 28, 38, 39]. From existing reports, fetal Zika infection occurs after primary maternal infection.
Congenital CMV infection is a leading cause of childhood permanent hearing loss and neurodevelopmental disabilities [15, 16, 40]. Congenital CMV-associated SNHL accounts for about 25% of all SNHL in children [41]. The number of children with congenital CMV-related disabilities is similar to or exceeds the number of children with better-known conditions such as Down syndrome or spina bifida [42]. The majority of the 20000–30000 children born with congenital CMV infection each year in the United States (approximately 85%–90%) do not exhibit any clinical abnormalities at birth (asymptomatic congenital CMV infection) [21, 23, 43–45]. The remaining 10%–15% born with clinical abnormalities are categorized as having clinically apparent or symptomatic congenital infection. The infection may involve multiple organ systems with particular predilection for the reticuloendothelial system and central nervous system (CNS) [43]. The most commonly observed clinical findings are petechial rash, jaundice, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and microcephaly. Ophthalmologic examination is abnormal in approximately 10% of infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection, with chorioretinitis and/or optic atrophy most commonly observed.
Laboratory abnormalities in children with symptomatic infection reflect the involvement of the hepatobiliary and reticuloendothelial systems and include conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevations of hepatic aminotransferases in more than half of symptomatic newborns [46–48]. Neuroimaging is abnormal in approximately 50%–70% of children with symptomatic infection at birth and intracerebral calcification is the most common abnormality [49, 50]. Although a number of nonspecific neuroimaging findings have been reported including ventricular dilatation, cysts, and lenticulostriate vasculopathy in infants with congenital CMV, the significance of these findings is not clear.
Approximately half of the infants with symptomatic infection will develop sequelae including SNHL, cognitive, and motor deficits [23, 44, 46–48, 51–55]. Predictors of adverse neurological outcome in children with symptomatic congenital CMV infection include microcephaly, the presence of other neurologic abnormalities at birth or in early infancy, neuroimaging abnormalities detected within the first month of life, and the presence of multiple clinical findings [44, 47, 49, 55–60]. Approximately 7%–15% of asymptomatic children will develop SNHL. Approximately one-half of children with asymptomatic infection who develop hearing loss will have bilateral deficits, which can vary from mild high frequency loss to profound impairment [23, 54, 61–64]. In addition, hearing loss in these children is often progressive and/or late onset, requiring ongoing monitoring [54, 61, 63, 64]. Other neurological complications may also occur in asymptomatic congenital CMV infection, and, although the data are sparse, are thought to occur at a much lower frequency than in symptomatic infection [64].
Decades of natural history studies of CMV infections during pregnancy have provided a solid framework for current and future studies of ZIKV infection during pregnancy. The utilization of a template derived from descriptions of CMV during pregnancy for studies of perinatal ZIKV infections is justified by the similarities of proposed mechanisms of CNS damage during both CMV and Zika infections that occur early in CNS development. These include virus-induced destruction of neural progenitor cells, alterations in the proliferative capacity of neural progenitor cells, and damage to the supporting vasculature. The catastrophic outcome of these infections very early in CNS development is evident in both postmortem and imaging studies of infants with congenital CMV and ZIKV infections and commonly include significant structural damage to the brain and spinal cord [64] (Table 1). In contrast, intrauterine infections later in pregnancy result in less dramatic evidence of CNS damage but nonetheless can be associated with a variety of disorders of neuronal cell positioning and cellular connectivity that often lead to a number of neurological abnormalities, including dysfunction of perceptual pathways such as hearing [64]. However, several lines of evidence provided by studies in experimental animals that model CMV and ZIKV infections in human fetuses argue that a host derived inflammatory component could contribute to disease in infections that are acquired later in gestation [64]. Thus, the commonalities in the pathogenesis of CNS damage resulting from either CMV or ZIKV infection of the fetus argue that a similar spectrum of neurological deficits can be expected following either infection and, in both cases, can be directly related to developmental status of the fetal CNS at the time of infection. How these findings will ultimately mirror ZIKV infection of infants can only be determined by similar large prospective studies.
Table 1.
Congenital CMV Infection | Congenital Zika Syndrome |
---|---|
Calcifications, ventricular dilation, cortical atrophy, white matter changes (CT) [49] |
Calcifications, ventricular dilation, white matter changes, cerebellar hypoplasia, hypogyria, basal ganglia changes (CT) [69] |
Calcifications, cerebellar hypoplasia, white matter changes (MRI) [65] |
Calcifications, cortical atrophy, ventricular dilation, cerebellar atrophy (US, CT) [70] |
Calcifications, hypogyria, lissencephaly [66] |
Calcifications, cortical loss, ventricular dilation, cerebellar atrophy, white matter changes, basal ganglia abnormalities (CT, MRI) [71] |
Cerebellar hypoplasia, hypogyria, lissencephaly, white matter changes (MRI) [67] |
|
Ventricular dilation, oligo/pachygyria (MRI) [68] |
Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound.
These lessons from studies of congenital CMV infections should be considered in designing natural history studies of infants born to women infected with Zika during pregnancy. Thus far, it is likely that only a small fraction of the total number of congenitally ZIKV-infected infants have presented with the stigmata of congenital ZIKV infection and that the vast majority of infected infants will only be identified by laboratory testing in the newborn period. Although congenitally Zika-infected infants with subclinical presentations will almost assuredly have more favorable long-term outcomes than infants with obvious CNS structural abnormalities, it is also very likely that many of these infants will be at risk for neurodevelopmental sequelae that mirror those described in infants with congenital CMV infections. Importantly, early identification of infants with neurodevelopmental abnormalities coupled with appropriate interventions offers the possibility of improved long-term outcomes.
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS
Human immunodeficiency virus, a member of the family of retroviruses, is estimated to have been responsible for the death of approximately 5 million children since 1981 when it was first recognized as the cause of AIDS [72]. The HIV pandemic has affected every continent, but some areas have been disproportionately affected. Of the estimated 33 million individuals currently infected with the virus, two-thirds live in sub-Saharan Africa.
In young children, infections occur predominately by transmission from infected mothers to their infants. Transmission can occur in utero, intrapartum, or postpartum through breastfeeding. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that approximately 8500 women with HIV give birth to infants in the United States annually [73]. Globally, the number of seropositive women delivering infants annually is not known, but with prevalence rates ranging from 15% to 40% among countries in southern Africa, an area most affected by the epidemic, the number of pregnant seropositive women delivering each year is substantial [74]. A major risk factor for transmission is maternal viral load [75].
During the past 2 decades, there has been substantial progress in prevention of perinatal HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection in children because of identification and treatment of HIV-infected pregnant women during pregnancy and delivery and subsequent prophylaxis of their infants with antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Countries with ready access to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) have seen the most significant decline in infections. With improved access to ARVs in priority countries in Africa, the number of new infections in infants from 2009 to 2012 decreased by almost 40% [76].
Both the life cycle of HIV and the pathogenesis of HIV infection are complex. HIV infects a number of cell types but its primary target is the activated CD4+ T lymphocyte, a cell that is central in the immune response. Soon after infection, there is a rapid increase in viral replication and dissemination of virus to the lymph nodes, gastrointestinal tract, and other lymphoid organs [77, 78]. In older individuals with a primary infection, the number of viral copies can reach 106 per mL of plasma [77] but there is a decrease in viral copy number to a new set point within weeks after activation of the immune response. In infants, the viral load increases to a similar level but, untreated, can remain at this level for years [78]. Over time, with sustained viral replication, and infection and destruction of CD4+ lymphocytes, there is a progressive loss of the memory and naive CD4+ T-lymphocyte population. The resulting immunodeficiency is associated with the myriad of disease manifestations, both infectious and noninfectious. Because the virus establishes a latent infection in CD4+ lymphocytes, the infection remains life-long even with therapy.
Most infants with intrauterine or perinatally acquired infection are asymptomatic at birth [79, 80]. Compared to older individuals, disease onset in untreated infants occurs much sooner and can progress rapidly in many children [80]. Failure to thrive, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, developmental delay, and oral thrush are common manifestations within the first few months of life. Progressive encephalopathy characterized by loss of developmental milestones, spasticity, and acquired microcephaly also occurs in some children [79, 80]. Basal ganglia calcifications and cerebral atrophy are characteristic findings on computed tomography. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is the most common opportunistic infection in young children and can occur before 1 year of age [81, 82].
The availability of ARVs has changed the prognosis for individuals with HIV infection. Prior to ART, an estimated 20% of children with HIV died by 2 years of age [83]. For children and adults, HIV infection is now considered a chronic infection that can be managed with ARVs. Therapy with ARVs suppresses viral replication and improves and maintains immune function if started early. With adherence to their medication, most children can remain asymptomatic.
HIV infection in infants is similar to congenital ZIKV infection in the timing and mechanisms of mother-to-child transmission. Like HIV, ZIKV-infected infants may be asymptomatic at birth but then develop disease within the first few months of life. The primary clinical manifestation they share is neurologic disease, particularly microcephaly, a finding that does not occur in HIV-treated infants who receive therapy early.
HEPATITIS B VIRUS
Hepatitis B virus is estimated to infect >350 million people worldwide with the main public health burden due to the effects of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma [84].
It is a hepatotropic virus that replicates in hepatocytes and is released into the bloodstream. The virus is present in all body fluids including blood, saliva, breast milk, and semen and is transmitted by percutaneous and permucosal contact and perinatal transmission [85]. It can survive on surfaces outside the body for at least 7 days, remaining infectious [86]. There are extrahepatic diseases related to HBV and it is estimated to be associated with 20% of membranous nephropathy cases in children [87].
Babies with perinatal infection with HBV are asymptomatic initially; however, approximately 90% will progress to chronic infection. Of those chronically infected, roughly 10%–30% will develop chronic hepatitis, of whom 20%–50% will progress to cirrhosis and 10% will subsequently develop hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, only 20%–50% in children 1–5 years of age and 5% in adults progress from acute to chronic infection with attendant complications [88].
Key proteins involved in the pathogenesis are the nucleocapsid core protein/ hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg), which is retained in infected hepatocyte; the precore protein/hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), which is secreted into blood and essential for establishment of persistent infection; and the envelope glycoprotein/hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), which is secreted into blood and is highly immunogenic [89].
Humoral antibody contributes to clearance of circulating viral particles and prevention of viral spread within the body. T-cell–mediated immune responses are required for elimination of infected hepatocytes and viral clearance. Persistent HBV infection results from an inefficient CD4 T-cell priming early in infection with the subsequent development of an ineffective CD8 T-cell response [89].
Neonatal tolerance to HBV is thought to be responsible for persistent infection. This tolerance is thought to be induced by the HBeAg that crosses the placenta as demonstrated in a transgenic mouse model. HBeAg has been shown to suppress the antibody and T-cell response to HBcAg [89].
Infants at greatest risk of infection are born to younger women who are HBeAg positive, have a high viral load, or receive <3 hepatitis B vaccine doses at the recommended times [90].
Unlike ZIKV, there is a highly effective vaccine that can prevent the transmission of HBV [91], a likely goal for a ZIKV vaccine. For pregnant women who are identified as HBsAg positive, their babies should receive a dose of HBV-specific immunoglobulin in addition to the vaccine, which helps prevent perinatal transmission up to 90% [92]; there is also an opportunity for immunoprophylaxis with high-titered Zika antibody products. Furthermore, antiviral therapy in high-risk mothers reduces but does not prevent transmission [93].
Antiviral medications are licensed for treatment of both children and adults who develop chronic HBV infection to help prevent the progression to cirrhosis and decrease the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.
NEONATAL HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS INFECTION
Approximately 85% of all cases of neonatal HSV infection are acquired by intrapartum contact of the fetus with infected maternal genital secretions. An additional 10% are acquired postnatally as a consequence of direct contact with an infected individual and 5% result from in utero transmission, resulting in congenital disease that is manifest at the time of birth. The overall incidence of neonatal HSV infection is estimated to range from 1 in 3000 to 1 in 20000 live births. The risk of transmission to the fetus is greatest for women who experience a primary infection during the third trimester of gestation, resulting in an estimated 25%–60% incidence of transmission to newborns. Importantly, just as is the case with ZIKV infection, maternal primary infection is usually asymptomatic [94–96].
Children with congenital HSV infection, albeit rare, most closely resemble babies with congenital Zika infection. These babies can present with combinations of microcephaly, retinitis, microphthalmia, skin scarring, and limb abnormalities. Babies with congenital HSV infection have a uniformly poor outcome with mortality in the first month of life in excess of 60% [97].
With the exception of congenital HSV infection, children who acquire neonatal herpes present between day 7 and day 21 of life, depending upon clinical manifestations. Children with disease caused by HSV infection present in 1 of 3 fashions. Disease can be localized to the skin, eye, and mouth, occurring in approximately 45% of newborns. These babies present at day 7–11 of life on average. Children with encephalitis, accounting for approximately 35% of newborns, present on average at 2 weeks of life. These children may or may not also have skin, eye, or mouth involvement. Finally, children with multiorgan disseminated disease account for 25% of cases, presenting at approximately 7–11 days of life [97, 98].
Prognosis with therapy varies according to disease classification. For those children with multiorgan disseminated disease, the mortality is approximately 35%. Approximately, 3 of 4 of these children will have CNS disease as well, with attendant complications. Those children with encephalitis, but without multiorgan involvement, have a lower mortality of 3%–5%, but the risk for significant neurologic impairment is high. These children can have impaired intellectual potential, seizure disorders, spasticity, and not infrequently, microcephaly. Notably, children with CNS disease caused by HSV-2 have a poorer outcome than those babies with HSV-1 infection, for unknown reasons. Last, children with disease localized to the skin, eye, and mouth have the best prognosis. In the absence of asymptomatic CNS involvement, these children virtually all develop normally but will have recurrent lesions [99, 100].
Contrasts to ZIKV infection are indicated. First, an antiviral drug exists for the treatment of neonatal HSV infection, namely acyclovir, whereas none is currently available for Zika. Second, suppressive acyclovir therapy, when administered for 6 months following newborn infection, results in an improved neurologic outcome, implying that HSV can replicate subclinically in CNS. Such remains unknown for Zika. Thus, long-term studies are mandatory. Third, the question of asymptomatic neonatal HSV infection has been debated; contact of newborns with infected maternal genital secretions may lead to late-onset abnormalities that have yet to be identified [99–102].
DISCUSSION
These 5 congenital viral infections provide important lessons for ongoing and future studies of ZIKV infection in both the newborn and developing infant. First, it is well established that women are infected by HSV that is transmitted from an asymptomatic male sexual partner, resulting in newborn disease. The contribution of male-to-female Zika transmission resulting in congenital infection remains to be defined but clearly is highly probable. Second, only through prospective cohort studies has it been possible to define the spectrum of sequelae in babies with congenital CMV, rubella, HIV, and HSV infections and, importantly, those abnormalities that appear later in life. Such will be the same for the apparently asymptomatically infected newborn whose mother had Zika infection, as was recently suggested by CDC investigators based on a nonhuman primate study [103]. Third, chronic subclinical replication of the lytic virus HSV can lead to significant neurologic impairment to a greater extent than CMV infection. With HSV, however, long-term therapy can improve outcome. Currently, no antiviral drugs exist for either the prevention or treatment of ZIKV infections in either mother or infant. Fourth, this review cannot fully address the need for antiviral therapy but with the introduction of safe drugs, the natural history of Zika will need to be redefined as it has been for CMV, HIV, and HSV infections. Finally, only rubella has been amenable to prevention by vaccination. Hopefully the same will be true for ZIKV in endemic areas.
Notes
Supplement sponsorship. This work is part of a supplement sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Potential conflicts of interest. S. B. B. reports grants from GSK Biologics Meridian Biosciences. R. J. W. is on the board of directors at Gilead Sciences and is an associate editor for The Journal of Infectious Diseases. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Petersen LR, Jamieson DJ, Powers AM, Honein MA. Zika virus. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1552–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Campos GS, Bandeira AC, Sardi SI. Zika virus outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 2015; 21:1885–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zanluca C, Melo VC, Mosimann AL, Santos GI, Santos CN, Luz K. First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2015; 110:569–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid risk assessment: Zika virus epidemic in the Americas: potential association with microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Solna, Sweden: ECDC, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fauci AS, Morens DM. Zika virus in the Americas—yet another arbovirus threat. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:601–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. World Health Organization. Zika virus microcephaly and Guillan-Barré syndrome. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM et al. . Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:59–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N et al. . Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:951–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Miller E, Cradock-Watson JE, Pollock TM. Consequences of confirmed maternal rubella at successive stages of pregnancy. Lancet 1982; 2:781–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. De Santis M, Cavaliere AF, Straface G, Caruso A. Rubella infection in pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2006; 21:390–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Morgan-Capner P, Miller E, Vurdien JE, Ramsay ME. Outcome of pregnancy after maternal reinfection with rubella. CDR (Lond Engl Rev) 1991; 1:R57–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Reef SE, Strebel P, Dabbagh A, Gacic-Dobo M, Cochi S. Progress toward control of rubella and prevention of congenital rubella syndrome—worldwide, 2009. J Infect Dis 2011; 204(suppl 1):S24–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Grant GB, Reef SE, Dabbagh A, Gacic-Dobo M, Strebel PM. Global progress toward rubella and congenital rubella syndrome control and elimination—2000–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64:1052–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Plotkin SA. The history of rubella and rubella vaccination leading to elimination. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43(suppl 3):S164–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Britt WJ. Cytomegalovirus. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonaldo Y, eds. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 7th ed Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011:706–55. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, Boppana SB, Gupta RK. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:86–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 2007; 17:253–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Alford CA, Pass RF. Epidemiology of chronic congenital and perinatal infections of man. Clin Perinatol 1981; 8:397–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wang C, Zhang X, Bialek S, Cannon MJ. Attribution of congenital cytomegalovirus infection to primary versus non-primary maternal infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:e11–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Stagno S, Reynolds DW, Huang ES, Thames SD, Smith RJ, Alford CA. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:1254–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Peckham CS, Chin KS, Coleman JC, Henderson K, Hurley R, Preece PM. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: preliminary findings from a prospective study. Lancet 1983; 1:1352–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Harris S et al. . Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and disease in Sweden and the relative importance of primary and secondary maternal infections. Preliminary findings from a prospective study. Scand J Infect Dis 1984; 16:129–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Harris S. Report on a long-term study of maternal and congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Sweden. Review of prospective studies available in the literature. Scand J Infect Dis 1999; 31:443–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gaytant MA, Rours GI, Steegers EA, Galama JM, Semmekrot BA. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection after recurrent infection: case reports and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 2003; 162:248–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Morris DJ, Sims D, Chiswick M, Das VK, Newton VE. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection after maternal recurrent infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13:61–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Stagno S, Pass RF, Dworsky ME, Alford CA Jr. Maternal cytomegalovirus infection and perinatal transmission. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25:563–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Schopfer K, Lauber E, Krech U. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborn infants of mothers infected before pregnancy. Arch Dis Child 1978; 53:536–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. de Vries JJ, van Zwet EW, Dekker FW, Kroes AC, Verkerk PH, Vossen AC. The apparent paradox of maternal seropositivity as a risk factor for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a population-based prediction model. Rev Med Virol 2013; 23:241–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Townsend CL, Forsgren M, Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Tookey PA, Peckham CS. Long-term outcomes of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56:1232–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. White NH, Yow MD, Demmler GJ et al. . Prevalence of cytomegalovirus antibody in subjects between the ages of 6 and 22 years. J Infect Dis 1989; 159:1013–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pass RF. Day-care centers and the spread of cytomegalovirus and parvovirus B19. Pediatr Ann 1991; 20:419–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF. Maternal age and congenital cytomegalovirus infection: screening of two diverse newborn populations, 1980–1990. J Infect Dis 1993; 168:552–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF. Maternal cytomegalovirus immunity and risk of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in future pregnancies [abstract]. Pediatr Res 1996; 39:171A.8825405 [Google Scholar]
- 34. Preece PM, Tookey P, Ades A, Peckham CS. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: predisposing maternal factors. J Epidemiol Community Health 1986; 40:205–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Walmus BF, Yow MD, Lester JW, Leeds L, Thompson PK, Woodward RM. Factors predictive of cytomegalovirus immune status in pregnant women. J Infect Dis 1988; 157:172–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Stagno S, Pass RF, Cloud G et al. . Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Incidence, transmission to fetus, and clinical outcome. JAMA 1986; 256:1904–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Preece PM, Blount JM, Glover J, Fletcher GM, Peckham CS, Griffiths PD. The consequences of primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Arch Dis Child 1983; 58:970–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mussi-Pinhata MM, Yamamoto AY, Moura Brito RM et al. . Birth prevalence and natural history of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a highly seroimmune population. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:522–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Dar L, Pati SK, Patro AR et al. . Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a highly seropositive semi-urban population in India. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008; 27:841–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Fowler KB, Boppana SB. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and hearing deficit. J Clin Virol 2006; 35:226–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening—a silent revolution. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2151–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Grosse SD, Dollard S, Ross DS, Cannon M. Newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus: options for hospital-based and public health programs. J Clin Virol 2009; 46(suppl 4):S32–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Pass RF, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Alford CA. Newborn findings and outcome in children with symptomatic congenital CMV infection. Pediatr Res 1992; 31:158A. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Pass RF. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection in infants born to mothers with preexisting immunity to cytomegalovirus. Pediatrics 1999; 104:55–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yow MD, Williamson DW, Leeds LJ et al. . Epidemiologic characteristics of cytomegalovirus infection in mothers and their infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:1189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Boppana SB, Pass RF, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Alford CA. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11:93–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Conboy TJ, Pass RF, Stagno S et al. . Early clinical manifestations and intellectual outcome in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 1987; 111:343–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kylat RI, Kelly EN, Ford-Jones EL. Clinical findings and adverse outcome in neonates with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (SCCMV) infection. Eur J Pediatr 2006; 165:773–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Vaid Y et al. . Neuroradiographic findings in the newborn period and long-term outcome in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 1997; 99:409–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Capretti MG, Lanari M, Tani G et al. . Role of cerebral ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Brain Dev 2014; 36:203–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF, Britt WJ, Boll TJ, Alford CA. The outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to maternal antibody status. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:663–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Demmler GJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control. Summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13:315–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ross SA, Fowler KB, Ashrith G et al. . Hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection born to mothers with preexisting immunity. J Pediatr 2006; 148:332–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Dahle AJ, Fowler KB, Wright JD, Boppana SB, Britt WJ, Pass RF. Longitudinal investigation of hearing disorders in children with congenital cytomegalovirus. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11:283–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Williamson WD, Desmond MM, LaFevers N, Taber LH, Catlin FI, Weaver TG. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus. Disorders of language, learning, and hearing. Am J Dis Child 1982; 136:902–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Rivera LB, Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Pass RF. Predictors of hearing loss in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 2002; 110:762–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ancora G, Lanari M, Lazzarotto T et al. . Cranial ultrasound scanning and prediction of outcome in newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2007; 150:157–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Noyola DE, Demmler GJ, Nelson CT et al. ; Houston Congenital CMV Longitudinal Study Group Early predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2001; 138:325–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Dreher AM, Arora N, Fowler KB et al. . Spectrum of disease and outcome in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2014; 164:855–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Pinninti SG, Rodgers MD, Novak Z et al. . Clinical predictors of sensorineural hearing loss and cognitive outcome in infants with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016; 35:924–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ, Boppana S, Britt WJ, Pass RF. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 1997; 130:624–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Harris S, Ahlfors K, Ivarsson S, Lernmark B, Svanberg L. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1984; 5:352–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Williamson WD, Demmler GJ, Percy AK, Catlin FI. Progressive hearing loss in infants with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 1992; 90:862–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Williamson WD, Percy AK, Yow MD et al. . Asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Audiologic, neuroradiologic, and neurodevelopmental abnormalities during the first year. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:1365–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Alarcon A, Martinez-Biarge M, Cabañas F, Hernanz A, Quero J, Garcia-Alix A. Clinical, biochemical, and neuroimaging findings predict long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2013; 163:828–34.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hayward JC, Titelbaum DS, Clancy RR, Zimmerman RA. Lissencephaly-pachygyria associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Child Neurol 1991; 6:109–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Barkovich AJ, Lindan CE. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection of the brain: imaging analysis and embryologic considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:703–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Boesch C, Issakainen J, Kewitz G, Kikinis R, Martin E, Boltshauser E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Radiol 1989; 19:91–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hazin AN, Poretti A, Di Cavalcanti Souza Cruz D et al. ; Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group Computed tomographic findings in microcephaly associated with Zika virus. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2193–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Brasil P, Nielsen-Saines K. More pieces to the microcephaly-Zika virus puzzle in Brazil. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16:1307–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Aragao MFVV, Brainer-Lima AM, Holanda AC et al. . Spectrum of spinal cord, spinal root, and brain MRI abnormalities in congenital Zika syndrome with and without arthrogryposis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38:1045–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Penazzato M, Amzel A, Abrams EJ et al. . Pediatric treatment scale-up: the unfinished agenda of the global plan. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 75(suppl 1):59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among pregnant women, infants, and children. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ramjee G, Daniels B. Women and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Res Ther 2013; 10:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Dickover RE, Garratty EM, Herman SA et al. . Identification of levels of maternal HIV-1 RNA associated with risk of perinatal transmission. Effect of maternal zidovudine treatment on viral load. JAMA 1996; 275:599–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2013 progress report on the global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Simon V, Ho DD, Abdool Karim Q. HIV/AIDS epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Lancet 2006; 368:489–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Maartens G, Celum C, Lewin SR. HIV infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Lancet 2014; 384:258–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Scott GB, Hutto C, Makuch RW et al. . Survival in children with perinatally acquired human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. N Engl J Med 1989; 321:1791–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Oxtoby MJ. Perinatally acquired human immunodeficiency virus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:609–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Epstein LG, Sharer LR, Oleske JM et al. . Neurologic manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus infection in children. Pediatrics 1986; 78:678–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Belman AL. Neurologic syndromes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 693:107–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Dunn D; HIV Paediatric Prognostic Markers Collaborative Study Group Short-term risk of disease progression in HIV-1-infected children receiving no antiretroviral therapy or zidovudine monotherapy: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2003; 362:1605–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kane M. Global programme for control of hepatitis B infection. Vaccine 1995; 13(suppl 1):S47–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Custer B, Sullivan SD, Hazlet TK, Iloeje U, Veenstra DL, Kowdley KV. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:S158–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Bond WW, Favero MS, Petersen NJ, Gravelle CR, Ebert JW, Maynard JE. Survival of hepatitis B virus after drying and storage for one week. Lancet 1981; 1:550–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Bhimma R, Coovadia HM, Adhikari M, Connolly CA. The impact of the hepatitis B virus vaccine on the incidence of hepatitis B virus-associated membranous nephropathy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157:1025–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Shapiro CN. Epidemiology of hepatitis B. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12:433–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Chisari FV, Isogawa M, Wieland SF. Pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus infection. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2010; 58:258–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Schillie S, Walker T, Veselsky S et al. . Outcomes of infants born to women infected with hepatitis B. Pediatrics 2015; 135:e1141–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Hou J, Liu Z, Gu F. Epidemiology and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection. Int J Med Sci 2005; 2:50–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Stevens CE, Taylor PE, Tong MJ et al. . Yeast-recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Efficacy with hepatitis B immune globulin in prevention of perinatal hepatitis B virus transmission. JAMA 1987; 257:2612–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Pan CQ, Duan Z, Dai E et al. ; China Study Group for the Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis B Tenofovir to prevent hepatitis B transmission in mothers with high viral load. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2324–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Jacobs RF et al. ; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group Natural history of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era. Pediatrics 2001; 108:223–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. James SH, Sheffield JS, Kimberlin DW. Mother-to-child transmission of herpes simplex virus. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2014; 3(suppl 1):S19–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Pinninti SG, Kimberlin DW. Maternal and neonatal herpes simplex virus infections. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30:113–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. James SH, Kimberlin DW. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2015; 29:391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Whitley R, Roizman B. Herpes simplex virus. In: Richman D, Whitley R, Hayden F, eds. Clinical virology. 4th ed Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2017:415–45. [Google Scholar]
- 99. James SH, Kimberlin DW. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection: epidemiology and treatment. Clin Perinatol 2015; 42:47–59, viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Pinninti SG, Kimberlin DW. Preventing herpes simplex virus in the newborn. Clin Perinatol 2014; 41:945–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Jacobs RF et al. ; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group Safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous acyclovir in the management of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections. Pediatrics 2001; 108:230–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Kimberlin DW, Whitley RJ, Wan W et al. ; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group Oral acyclovir suppression and neurodevelopment after neonatal herpes. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:1284–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Highleyman L. Infant Zika infection may cause wide-ranging brain damage: animal model suggests many abnormalities besides microcephaly can arise https://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/PAS/65176. Accessed 11 May 2017.