Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2016 Sep 22;68(2):161–176. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw343

C3 cotyledons are followed by C4 leaves: intra-individual transcriptome analysis of Salsola soda (Chenopodiaceae)

Maximilian Lauterbach 1,, Kumari Billakurthi 2,3, Gudrun Kadereit 1, Martha Ludwig 4, Peter Westhoff 2,3, Udo Gowik 2
PMCID: PMC5853821  PMID: 27660482

The genome of Salsola soda allows a transition from C3 to C4 photosynthesis. A developmental transcriptome series revealed novel genes showing expression patterns similar to those encoding C4 proteins.

Keywords: C4 photosynthesis, Caryophyllales, Chenopodiaceae, cotyledon, development, leaf, RNA seq, Salsola, transcriptome

Abstract

Some species of Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) convert from C3 photosynthesis during the seedling stage to the C4 pathway in adult leaves. This unique developmental transition of photosynthetic pathways offers the exceptional opportunity to follow the development of the derived C4 syndrome from the C3 condition within individual plants, avoiding phylogenetic noise. Here we investigate Salsola soda, a little-studied species from tribe Salsoleae, using an ontogenetic approach. Anatomical sections, carbon isotope (δ13C) values, transcriptome analysis by means of mRNA sequencing, and protein levels of the key C4 enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) were examined from seed to adult plant stages. Despite a previous report, our results based on δ13C values, anatomy and transcriptomics clearly indicate a C3 phase during the cotyledon stage. During this stage, the entire transcriptional repertoire of the C4 NADP-malic enzyme type is detected at low levels compared to a significant increase in true leaves. In contrast, abundance of transcripts encoding most of the major photorespiratory enzymes is not significantly decreased in leaves compared to cotyledons. PEPC polypeptide was detected only in leaves, correlating with increased PEPC transcript abundance from the cotyledon to leaf stage.

Introduction

Our knowledge of the biochemistry of C4 photosynthesis (C4) has broadened enormously in the 50 years since its discovery (Hatch and Slack, 1966), as recent molecular and analytical tools offer new possibilities to also expand our understanding of the molecular genetics of C4. C4 is a carbon concentration mechanism that is thought to have evolved from C3 photosynthesis (C3) in response to conditions favouring photorespiration, for example hot and/or dry environments (Ehleringer et al., 1991; Bauwe et al., 2010). This mechanism is realized through a spatial division of labour between two compartments of the photosynthetically active organ, and in most C4 plants takes place between mesophyll (M) and bundle sheath (BS) tissues of leaves (Edwards et al., 2004). This division of labour is accompanied by differential expression of genes encoding C4 proteins that function in the two compartments (Hibberd and Covshoff, 2010) and more transport processes are required in C4 than C3 (Weber and von Caemmerer, 2010). Additional changes are seen in leaf anatomy and gene regulation (reviewed in Gowik and Westhoff, 2011; Langdale, 2011). The polyphyletic origin of C4 – currently at least 60 independent origins are known, including both monocot and dicot lineages (Sage, 2016) – allows the investigation of C4 evolution in a wide range of plant groups.

During the last few years, our knowledge of the molecular genetics of C4 increased dramatically, as large-scale analysis of gene expression in non-model species (i.e. RNA sequencing) has become feasible and allowed extensive comparisons of gene expression between closely related C3 and C4 species. The understanding of C4 evolution has been significantly promoted by differential gene expression (DGE) analyses, for example in eudicots between C3 and C4 species of the genus Flaveria or from the Cleomaceae (e.g. Bräutigam et al., 2011, 2014; Gowik et al., 2011; Mallmann et al., 2014; Külahoglu et al., 2014; van den Bergh et al., 2014; Aubry et al., 2016). However, the greatest diversity of the C4 syndrome in eudicots is neither found in Asteraceae nor in Cleomaceae, but in the Amaranthaceae/Chenopodiaceae alliance (Pyankov et al., 2001a; Kadereit et al., 2003, 2012, 2014; Schütze et al., 2003; Sage et al., 2007; Kadereit and Freitag, 2011), where at least 15 independent C4 origins are proposed, ten of these within Chenopodiaceae sensu stricto (Sage, 2016). While several studies have highlighted a vast diversity in leaf anatomy (Edwards and Voznesenskaya, 2011) and biochemistry in different species of the Chenopodiaceae (Kadereit et al., 2003), until now, only a single study compared transcriptomes between C3 and C4 types within this family (Li et al., 2015). In that study, the transcriptomes of cotyledons conducting C3 and C4 assimilating shoots of Haloxylon ammodendron (C.A. Mey.) Bunge were compared. The differences detected are not caused by variation between species, but can be associated with differences between C3 and C4, or to organ-related variation. However, due to its tree-like growth form, H. ammodendron is, in practical terms, not ideal as a model species. On the other hand, it belongs to the tribe Salsoleae and within this tribe, several species are known that conduct C3 in cotyledons and C4 in assimilating shoots/leaves (Pyankov et al., 1999, 2000, 2001b).

In the current study, we introduce Salsola soda L. from Salsoleae as a model system to study the developmental transition from C3 cotyledons to C4 leaves. Salsola soda offers several advantages for increasing our knowledge of C4. Firstly, the transition from C3 to C4 occurs naturally from cotyledons to leaves, as shown in this study by anatomical sections and carbon isotope data. Secondly, S. soda has an annual life cycle (Freitag, 1997; ML, personal observation) and it is easily cultivated in the greenhouse. Salsola soda seeds germinate easily and quickly, plants are self-compatible, and it produces many seeds each year (ML, personal observation). Finally, S. soda belongs to a tribe (Salsoleae) that is diverse in C3, C3-C4 intermediate and C4 species (Schüssler et al., submitted).

We investigated the transition from a C3 to a C4 metabolism by conducting deep sequencing of transcriptomes (RNA-seq) of five different developmental stages, from young seedling to adult plant. We reveal detailed insights into gene expression patterns based on the different organs and/or stages. All the transcripts predicted for a NADP-malic enzyme (NADP-ME) type species were highly abundant in leaves while being mostly absent in cotyledons. Consequently, the results of this study present the opportunity to perform detailed targeted investigations of genes encoding potentially novel C4 proteins.

Materials and methods

Plant growth and sampled developmental stages

The Salsola soda seed sample used in this study was collected on a stony beach of the Adriatic coast south-west of Trieste, near Strunjan, in the Naravni nature reserve (Lagune Struzja Salinen; 45°31ʹ40.74ʹʹN, 13°36ʹ12.07ʹʹE) in Slovenia by M. Kaligaric s.n. (25 October 2012). A voucher of this collection is deposited at the herbarium of the University of Mainz (MJG no. 014562).

Salsola soda plants were grown in potting soil (custom mixed soil from the Botanical Garden, University of Mainz) in a glasshouse at the University of Mainz with supplementary light under a light intensity of ~300 µmol m−2 s−1. Samples were harvested during April and May 2014, between 10:30 and 13:00, and dried in silica, or immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for measurement of carbon isotope values and RNA extraction, respectively.

Anatomy

Fresh plant material was fixed in AFE (acetic acid-formaldehyde-ethanol), dehydrated using an ethanol series, and embedded in Technovit 7100 (Heraeus Kulzer). Transverse sections, 5–10 µm thick, of the middle regions of fully developed cotyledons and leaves were made using a rotary microtome (Leitz) and stained in a 6:6:5:6 mixture of Azur II, Eosin Y, methylene blue and distilled water. Eukitt (O. Kindler) was used as the mounting medium and images of the sections were taken using a Leitz Diaplan light microscope combined with Leica Application Suite 2.8.1. For a more detailed description of the sectioning method, see Bohley et al. (2015) and Lauterbach et al. (2016).

Stable carbon isotope measurements

Cotyledons and leaves of S. soda were harvested (see above) and dried for several days in silica gel. Dry leaf samples were pulverized using the mixer mill MM 301 (Retsch). Approximately 200mg of each sample were used to determine stable carbon isotope ratios (i.e. 13C/12C) relative to the Pee Dee belemnite standard (Craig, 1957) by the Institut für Geowissenschaften at the University of Mainz. Ten different developmental stages were sampled and measured (each stage with technical triplicates): (i) dry seed, (ii) imbibed seed, (iii) young cotyledon, (iv) mature cotyledon, (v) young first leaf pair, (vi) mature first leaf pair, (vii) young second leaf pair, (viii) mature second leaf pair, (ix) mature third leaf pair, and (x) mature leaf of an adult plant.

RNA extraction, library preparation, mRNA sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from 18–120mg ground plant tissue with the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol (January 2011), including DNase digestion with the RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen). RNA quality and quantity were determined with the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies), NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Qubit (Life Technologies). For each sample, 500ng of high-quality, total RNA (RNA Integrity Number between 8.8 and 9.6) were used for cDNA library preparation with the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc.), following the Low Sample Protocol (TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation v2 Guide, Illumina Proprietary, Part # 15026495 Rev. C, May 2012). Sequence determination of 100bp single reads was performed on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. Five different developmental stages of individual S. soda plants were included in the experiment (each with biological triplicates): stage 1 (yS), whole imbibed seed 2 d after germination; stage 2 (Cot), fully expanded, mature cotyledon, where the tip (±10mm) of the first leaf pair was visible (~6 d after germination); stage 3 (1L), mature first leaf pair and at this stage the tip of the second leaf pair was visible (~20 d after germination); stage 4 (2L), mature second leaf pair and again at this stage the tip of the third leaf was visible (~40 d after germination); and stage 5 (oL), mature leaf pair of an adult plant (~4 months after germinating).

Mapping, statistics, data analysis, gene expression

Sequence reads were checked for quality with FASTQC tool (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and filtered and trimmed using FASTX toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). Raw reads were mapped onto coding sequences of the ‘minimal’ TAIR 9 transcriptome (i.e. genome duplications in the lineage of Brassicaceae and tandem duplicated genes were reduced to one representative for each; Bräutigam et al., 2011) by BLAT (Kent, 2002), and the best hit for each read was counted. Gene expression was normalized to reads per kilobase coding sequence per million mappable reads (RPKM) and a threshold of 1 RPKM per coding sequence present in at least one stage was defined as true transcription. Differentially expressed transcripts were determined by edgeR (Robinson et al., 2010) in R (R Core Team, 2016). Log2 expression ratios were calculated and a significance threshold of 0.01 was defined after Benjamini-Hochberg correction to account for multiple testing (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). A log2 fold change (FC) of ≥1 was applied to call differentially expressed genes. To identify and visualize expression patterns of interest, hierarchical clustering using Euclidean distance (Eisen et al., 1998) of all samples was performed with the MeV 4.9 software (MultiExperiment Viewer, http://www.tm4.org/mev.html). To investigate which biological functions were active at each stage, transcriptional investment (defined as percentage of all transcripts with at least one RPKM in one stage belonging to a particular MapMan category) was analysed using MapMan (www.mapman.gabipd.org/;Thimm et al., 2004). Gene ontology analyses were performed using GORILLA (Gene Ontology enRIchment anaLysis and visuaLizAtion tool, Eden et al., 2007, 2009) online service. K-means clustering (K=20 clusters; Pearson correlation; Soukas et al., 2000) of all expressed transcripts with ≥1 RPKM were performed using MeV 4.9 software.

Immunoblot analysis

Proteins were extracted from eight developmental stages (young seedling, mature cotyledon, young first leaf pair, mature first leaf pair, young second leaf pair, mature second leaf pair, young third leaf pair, and an old leaf pair of an adult plant) in ground glass homogenizers following the method of Martinez et al. (1999), and protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Equal amounts of total soluble protein were separated on 12% (w/v) resolving gels (Laemmli, 1970), and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane using a semi-dry transfer method (Ludwig et al., 1998). After transfer, blots were rinsed briefly three times in 12.5mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 137mM NaCl, and 2.7mM KCl (TBS) containing 1% (v/v) Tween 20 (TBST), and non-specific sites were blocked by incubation in TBST containing 5% (w/v) skim milk powder (blocking buffer) for at least 1h. The blots were then incubated in a 1:10 000 dilution of rabbit anti-maize PEPC antiserum (Chemicon) in blocking buffer for 1h at room temperature, washed three times for 5min each, in TBST, and labelled with a 1:3000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase coupled anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (GE Healthcare) in blocking buffer. After three 5-min washes in TBS, immunoreactive polypeptides were visualized and imaged using chemiluminescence (ECL Western Blotting Substrate; Pierce) and a Bio-Rad Chemi-Doc MP.

Results

Anatomical survey shows C3 anatomy in cotyledons and C4 anatomy in leaves of Salsola soda

Cotyledons of S. soda are slightly flattened to biconvex and moderately succulent. Transverse sections of cotyledons show an isobilateral C3 anatomy, with one plane of vascular bundles (VB), including one distinct, main VB in the centre and up to six smaller VB surrounded by weakly developed water storage (WS) tissue (Fig. 1A). Towards the outside of the organ, the WS tissue is gradually replaced by the chlorenchyma, which consists of two to three layers of round to oval M cells (Fig. 1A). In contrast, S. soda leaves are terete, succulent and exhibit C4 anatomy. Transverse sections show a large central zone of WS tissue with one distinct main VB in the centre, and many (>20) smaller VB at the periphery, most in close contact with Kranz cells (KC; Fig. 1B). Chloroplasts of the KC layer are centripetally positioned. On the outer side of the KC layer is one layer of M cells, containing numerous chloroplasts. Surrounding the M is subepidermal non-chlorenchymatous tissue, called the hypodermis, and external to the hypodermis, a one-layered epidermis. Additionally, leaves of S. soda have three to four ‘windows’, which are gaps in the wreath composed of M and KC tissues, filled by two to three cells of WS tissue (Fig. 1B). These windows are visible at the leaf surface with the naked eye, and appear as whitish stripes with proximal-distal orientation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Anatomy of Salsola soda photosynthetic organs. Transverse sections of (A) cotyledon and (B) leaf of S. soda. CH, chlorenchyma; CVB, central vascular bundle; E, epidermis; H, hypodermis; KC, Kranz cells; M, mesophyll; PVB, peripheral vascular bundle; WC, window cells; WS, water storage tissue. Scale bars, 100 µm.

Carbon isotope values confirm C3 metabolism in cotyledons and C4 metabolism in leaves

Stable carbon isotope discrimination can be used as an indicator of C4 metabolism, since C4 plants discriminate less than C3 plants against 13C (O’Leary, 1981; Cernusak et al., 2013). Carbon isotope values (δ 13C) of the ten developmental stages from dry seed to the mature leaf of an adult plant confirm the anatomical observations: cotyledons of S. soda appear to perform C3 whereas leaves perform C4 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online). Starting with C4-like δ 13C values in imbibed seeds and young cotyledons (−15.83 and −17.34), the δ 13C value clearly decreases and falls into a C3-like range during the mature cotyledon and young first leaf pair stages (−22.37 and −22.39). After this C3 phase of the development, the δ 13C value increases again, and C4 values are exhibited from the mature first leaf pair stage onwards (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Stable carbon isotopes of ten developmental stages of Salsola soda. Typical C4 values are −15 and above (less negative, indicated as light grey line) and typical C3 values are −22 and below (more negative, indicated as dark grey line); measurements are shown as black line (actual values can be found in Supplementary Table S1).

Transcriptomes of five Salsola soda developmental stages have comparable quality

We looked at DGE by means of mRNA sequencing in five developmental stages of S. soda, including (i) imbibed seed (yS), (ii) mature cotyledons (Cot), (iii) mature primary leaves (1L), (iv) mature secondary leaves (2L), (v) leaves of a 4-month-old plant (oL).

mRNA sequencing yielded between 25.5 and 38.8 million single-end raw reads per replicate, with at least 97.3% or more high-quality reads remaining after trimming and quality filtering (Table 1). Data are available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/ (Supplementary Table S2). Since read quality was found to be very high, we decided to map all reads (i.e. raw reads) against protein-coding sequences of Arabidopsis. We were able to map between 9.6 and 17.9 million of the raw reads (30.7–47.8%). The mapping specificity between all samples remained the same (always reads of the same species, S. soda, were mapped onto coding sequences of Arabidopsis) and thus mapping was comparable between all five stages (Supplementary Table S3). Between 12252 and 13189 genes were expressed with at least one RPKM per stage, and altogether we identified 14119 different genes with at least one RPKM.

Table 1.

Summary of sequencing information: number of raw and clean reads, total and % of mapped reads onto minimal TAIR9 transcriptome, and reads with >1 RPKM, >500 RPKM, and >1000 RPKM of the five developmental stages: imbibed seed (yS), mature cotyledons (Cot), mature primary leaves (1L), mature secondary leaves (2L), and leaves of a 4-month-old plant (oL)

Mean >1 RPKM yS Cot 1L 2L oL
12252 13189 12832 12508 12849
yS_1 yS_2 yS_3 Cot_1 Cot_2 Cot_3 1L_1 1L_2 1L_3 2L_1 2L_2 2L_3 oL_1 oL_2 oL_3
No. of raw reads
(in m.)
30.55 33.71 31.25 30.43 38.26 34.46 37.41 37.83 25.54 30.46 37.89 36.38 29.87 35.74 35.47
No. of clean reads
(in m.)
29.93 32.82 30.48 29.88 37.47 33.78 36.70 37.12 24.96 29.92 37.17 35.72 29.33 35.05 34.80
No. of clean reads
(in %)
98.0 97.3 97.5 98.2 97.9 98.0 98.1 98.1 97.7 98.2 98.1 98.2 98.2 98.1 98.1
No. of mapped reads
(in m.)
11.42 11.44 9.58 12.74 16.44 13.40 16.95 17.42 11.29 14.57 17.87 17.23 11.88 15.38 14.09
No. of mapped reads
(in %)
37.4 33.9 30.7 41.9 43.0 38.9 45.3 46.0 44.2 47.8 47.2 47.4 39.8 43.0 39.7
No. of genes with
>1 RPKM
11793 12498 11168 13161 13196 12974 12691 12902 12720 12423 12534 12535 12941 12608 12852
No. of genes with
>500 RPKM
257 206 252 257 274 221 223 267 239 237 232 233 201 197 215
No. of genes with
>1000 RPKM
109 82 118 81 90 86 84 94 80 86 86 88 83 84 83

Large-scale comparison of expression patterns of the Salsola soda developmental stages show quantitative differences

According to their transcript profiles, replicates of each S. soda developmental stage group closely together in hierarchical clustering (Fig. 3A) and in a multidimensional scaling plot (Fig. 3B). In hierarchical clustering, the oL samples group more closely with Cot samples, while 1L and 2L samples differ from the oL replicates (Fig. 3A). In the multidimensional scaling plot, yS and oL samples are clearly distinct to all other stages (Fig. 3B). The 1L and 2L samples group closely together, and the Cot samples are nearest to the 1L-2L cluster (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Transcript similarity of the five sampled Salsola soda developmental stages. Triplicate values for each stage are represented as (A) hierarchical clustering of all transcripts and (B) multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot of all transcripts. yS_1-3, young seedling; Cot_1-3, cotyledon; 1L_1-3, first leaf pair; 2L_1-3, second leaf pair; oL_1-3, leaf pair old plant.

In all five stages of S. soda development that were investigated, transcriptional investment is highest in the ‘protein’ MapMan bin (Fig. 4). In the earliest stage of imbibed seeds (yS), this category includes up to one third of all transcripts. Other MapMan bins containing abundant transcripts at all developmental stages (Fig. 4) are ‘not assigned’ (9.74–15.07%), ‘RNA’ (3.41–5.98%), and ‘transport’ (4.42–5.63%). MapMan bin ‘PS’ (photosynthesis) contains a high percentage of transcripts (14.44–27.08%) at all stages except yS (1.07%), with the highest percentage at stages 1L and 2L (24.86% and 27.08%, respectively). In contrast to ‘PS’, the ‘stress’ bin has the highest transcript pool at the yS stage (7.54%) compared to other stages (2.03–2.40%).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Distribution of transcriptional investment. Transcriptional investment is defined as the percentage of all transcripts belonging to a particular MapMan category (for category definitions see www.mapman.gabipd.org/).

Enriched gene ontology (GO) terms that are significantly (FDR q-value ≤0.01) more abundant at a particular stage compared with the other stages correlate with results from the MapMan bin analysis. Enriched GO terms within the 3311 transcripts showing increased abundance in yS compared to Cot encode proteins involved in processes related to transport, especially ‘nuclear transport’, ‘protein transport’ and ‘RNA transport’ (Table 2). The 3630 transcripts showing increased abundance in Cot compared to yS are enriched in GO terms related to biosynthetic processes, lipid metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis and photosynthesis (Table 2, Supplementary Table S4).

Table 2.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched in Salsola soda developmental transcriptomes. Top ten GO terms enriched in one stage (first column) compared to a certain other stage (second column) ranked by P-value (see Supplementary Table S4 for all GO terms with P-value ≤0.01 and FDR q-value ≤0.01)

Stage Upregulated compared to Enriched GO term P-value FDR q-value Description
yS Cot GO:0006913 2.11E-13 6.47E-10 nucleocytoplasmic transport
GO:0051169 2.11E-13 3.24E-10 nuclear transport
GO:0034504 7.30E-12 7.48E-09 protein localization to nucleus
GO:0006606 7.30E-12 5.61E-09 protein import into nucleus
GO:1902593 7.30E-12 4.49E-09 single-organism nuclear import
GO:0051170 7.30E-12 3.74E-09 nuclear import
GO:0051028 1.29E-08 5.68E-06 mRNA transport
GO:0050658 5.96E-08 2.29E-05 RNA transport
GO:0050657 5.96E-08 2.03E-05 nucleic acid transport
GO:0051236 5.96E-08 1.83E-05 establishment of RNA localization
Cot yS GO:0019682 4.20E-23 1.29E-19 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate metabolic process
GO:0006081 4.89E-18 7.51E-15 cellular aldehyde metabolic process
GO:0044710 2.18E-17 2.23E-14 single-organism metabolic process
GO:0006629 3.24E-17 2.49E-14 lipid metabolic process
GO:0019288 9.31E-16 5.72E-13 isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthetic process, methylerythritol 4-phosphate pathway
GO:0009240 9.31E-16 4.77E-13 isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthetic process
GO:0046490 9.31E-16 4.08E-13 isopentenyl diphosphate metabolic process
GO:0008610 1.94E-15 7.43E-13 lipid biosynthetic process
GO:0044711 2.67E-15 9.11E-13 single-organism biosynthetic process
GO:0044699 9.08E-14 2.79E-11 single-organism process
1L Cot GO:0016556 2.81E-08 8.63E-05 mRNA modification
GO:0009653 6.62E-08 1.02E-04 anatomical structure morphogenesis
GO:0005984 2.99E-07 3.07E-04 disaccharide metabolic process
GO:0019682 1.01E-06 7.74E-04 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate metabolic process
GO:0044550 1.23E-06 7.53E-04 secondary metabolite biosynthetic process
GO:0010103 1.92E-06 9.83E-04 stomatal complex morphogenesis
GO:0090626 1.92E-06 8.42E-04 plant epidermis morphogenesis
GO:0009311 3.77E-06 1.45E-03 oligosaccharide metabolic process
GO:0007169 4.16E-06 1.42E-03 transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway
GO:0007167 4.16E-06 1.28E-03 enzyme linked receptor protein signalling pathway
2L none --- --- ---
2L 1L none --- --- ---
oL 1L+2L GO:0031347 6.78E-09 2.08E-05 regulation of defence response
GO:0080134 1.50E-08 2.31E-05 regulation of response to stress
GO:0006811 1.06E-07 1.08E-04 ion transport
GO:1901698 2.86E-07 2.20E-04 response to nitrogen compound
GO:0042537 3.33E-07 2.05E-04 benzene-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0048583 4.38E-07 2.24E-04 regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0043207 5.94E-07 2.61E-04 response to external biotic stimulus
GO:0009607 7.64E-07 2.93E-04 response to biotic stimulus
GO:0045088 1.21E-06 4.14E-04 regulation of innate immune response
GO:0050896 1.37E-06 4.19E-04 response to stimulus

When the 1L stage is compared to Cot, mRNA metabolism, including modification and editing of mRNA, anatomical structure organization and development, stomata and epidermis morphogenesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis are enriched processes among the 1046 transcripts (Table 2, Supplementary Table S4). While leaf development in 1L stage might not be entirely complete, processes not absolutely required for growth like secondary metabolism are already present. In contrast, we found no enriched GO term when comparing 1L stage and 2L stage (Table 2), which is consistent with both the hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling plot analyses, indicating the similarity of the 1L and 2L samples (Fig. 3).

Comparing stage oL to stages 1L and 2L, we found the 786 transcripts showing increased abundance were enriched in GO terms that reflect regulatory functions in response and/or defence to stress and biotic stimuli, for example ‘regulation of defence response’, ‘regulation of response to stress’, ‘ion transport’ and ‘response to stimulus’ (Table 2).

Differentially expressed marker/signature genes among stages

Genes coding for proteins involved in post-germination seedling growth/early developmental stages are preferentially expressed in yS and Cot but not in the leaf stages. These genes include those encoding two key enzymes of the glyoxylate cycle, isocitrate lyase and malate synthase (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S5). The glyoxylate cycle functions in the mobilization of sugars from storage lipids during developing seed and seedling stages, and takes place in the glyoxysomes. Specifically, acetyl-CoA arising from beta oxidation gets converted to organic compounds, which then enter the citric acid cycle in the mitochondria, resulting in the formation of oxaloacetate, which in turn is decarboxylated by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEP-CK) to form CO2 and PEP, with the latter entering gluconeogenesis. In Cucurbita pepo, PEP-CK activity is low in the first 2 d of seed germination and dramatically increases between days 2 and 4, followed by no detectable activity in young leaves (Leegood and Ap Rees, 1978). Our findings are consistent with this scheme: S. soda sequences mapping to one of the two Arabidopsis PEP-CK genes encoding PEP-CK 1 and PEP-CK 2, are low in the yS stage, highly abundant in Cot, and are essentially absent in all three leaf stages (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S5). In contrast to the yS stage, many transcripts coding for proteins involved in photosynthesis are abundant in the Cot sample, including those coding for RuBisCO (AT1G67090, AT5G38410), several chlorophyll a/b binding proteins (e.g. AT1G61520, AT2G05070, AT3G47470, AT5G54270), photosystem I (PSI) subunits (e.g. AT1G30380, AT2G20260, AT4G12800, AT5G64040) and photosystem II (PSII) subunits (e.g. AT1G51400, AT1G79040, AT2G06520) (Supplementary Table S5). In the 1L and 2L stages, 30 out of 130 genes assigned to the category ‘photosynthesis’ show significant increase in transcript abundance compared to the Cot stage, and transcripts from 81 genes are increased in abundance compared to yS (Supplementary Table S5). These results indicate that while photosynthesis is functional at the Cot stage, but not at yS, it is more fully engaged in leaves.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Relative transcript abundance of selected genes during development of Salsola soda. Transcript abundances are plotted as a heat map, which includes four genes coding for proteins of the glyoxylate cycle, two RuBisCO subunit genes, 17 genes encoding photorespiratory proteins, and 25 genes coding for C4-associated proteins at the five developmental stages: imbibed seed (yS), mature cotyledons (Cot), mature primary leaves (1L), mature secondary leaves (2L), and leaves of a four-month old plant (oL). ICL, isocitrate lyase; MS, malate synthase; PEP-CK, PEP carboxykinase; RuBisCO small subunit 1A; RuBisCO small subunit 3b; PGP1/PGLP1, 2-phosphoglycolate phosphatase 1; GOX, glycolate oxidase; GGT1, glutamate:glyoxylate aminotransferase 1; GDC, glycine decarboxylase; SHMT1, serine hydroxymethyltransferase; AGT/SGT, serine:glyoxylate aminotransferase; HPR1, NADH-dependent hydroxypyruvate reductase 1; GLYK, glycerate 3-kinase; BCA3, β-carbonic anhydrase 3; PEPC, PEP carboxylase; NADP-MDH, NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase; Asp-AT5, aspartate aminotransferase; NADP-ME, NADP-dependent malate enzyme; Ala-AT1, alanine aminotransferase 1; PPdK, pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase; AMK2, adenosine monophosphate kinase; PPase6, pyrophosphatase; Dit, dicarboxylate transporter; BASS, bile acid:sodium symporter family protein; NHD2, sodium:hydrogen antiporter; PPT/CUE, PEP/phosphate translocator; TPT, triose phosphate translocator; PEPC-K, PEP carboxylase kinase; PEPC-RP, PEP carboxylase-related pro ein; PPdK-RP, PPdK-related protein.(see Supplementary Table S5 for transcript details).

Transcripts encoding proteins of C4 photosynthesis are highly abundant in leaf stages

Since a major focus of this study was the developmental transition from C3 to C4 in S. soda, we examined the abundance of transcripts coding for known core C4 cycle genes, C4-related transporters and C4-related regulatory proteins, with emphasis on stages Cot (representing C3), and 1L and 2L (representing C4).

Transcripts encoding most of the known proteins of the NADP-ME subtype of C4 were significantly (FDR q-value ≤0.01, and log2 fold-change of ≥1) more abundant in leaves compared to Cot (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S5). These included phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) 1 and PEPC2, NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase (NADP-MDH), aspartate aminotransferase 5 (Asp-AT5), NADP-dependent malic enzyme (NADP-ME) 1, NADP-ME2 and NADP-ME4, alanine aminotransferase 1 (Ala-AT1) and pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK).

The detection of transcripts encoding two PEPC isoforms, PEPC1 and PEPC2, might be an artefact due to erroneous read mappings on the closest orthologue in Arabidopsis, and was observed in previous studies (Gowik et al., 2011; Külahoglu et al., 2014). As PEPC plays a pivotal role in the C4 pathway, and transcript abundance does not always correlate with protein levels (Vélez-Bermúdez and Schmidt, 2014), the abundance of PEPC protein was also investigated in cotyledon and leaves of S. soda. When blots of cotyledon and leaf soluble protein extracts were labelled with an anti-PEPC antiserum, a single immunoreactive polypeptide of ~100kDa (which is consistent with the mass of other plant PEPC proteins, O’Leary et al., 2011), was only detected in the leaf extracts. The older leaves demonstrated the more intense labelling (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Immunoblot labelling of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Total protein (12 µg) extracted from eight different developmental stages of Salsola soda were separated on a denaturing gel, blotted to nitrocellulose, and labelled with a rabbit anti-maize phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase antiserum. The position of the 97kDa molecular mass marker is shown on the right.

Increased abundance of transcripts encoding C4-related transporters was found for dicarboxylate transporter (DiT) 1, DiT2, bile acid:sodium symporter family protein (BASS) 2, BASS4, sodium:hydrogen antiporter 2 (NHD2), phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator (PPT) 1 (also known as CUE1) and PPT2 (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S5). Increased levels of mRNA were detected for C4-related regulatory and auxiliary proteins, including adenosine monophosphate kinase 2 (AMK2), pyrophosphatase 6 (PPase6), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase 1 (PEPC-K1), PEPC-related protein (PEPC-RP) and PPDK regulatory protein 2 (PPdK-RP2).

The levels of transcripts coding for some proteins typically associated with C4, however, were not increased in one, two or all three leaf stages. These exceptions include: beta carbonic anhydrase 3 (β-CA3), which shows higher transcript abundance in 1L and 2L, than in oL; triose phosphate translocator (TPT) mRNA levels, which are increased in 2L, but not in 1L or oL; transcripts encoding PPDK-RP1 are higher in 2L and oL, but not in 1L; PEPC-K1 mRNA abundance is higher in all leaf stages than in earlier developmental stages, but still very low in 1L; transcripts coding for PEPC-K2 are higher in 2L and oL, than in 1L; PPase6 transcript abundance is increased in 1L and 2L, but not in oL (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S5).

Some transcripts gradually increase in abundance from stage 1L to stage 2L and peak in oL stage, for example, those encoding NHD2, PEPC-K1 and PEPC-K2, and PPDK-RP1 and PPDK-RP2. In contrast, transcripts encoding enzymes functioning in the NAD-malic enzyme (NAD-ME) or PEP-CK C4 subtypes such as the decarboxylation enzymes NAD-ME or PEP-CK did not show increased levels in leaves.

Taken together, these results indicate that most of the genes coding for known proteins of NADP-ME C4 subtype behave as predicted if C3 and C4 conducting tissues are compared (cotyledons and leaves of S. soda, respectively).

The levels of most transcripts encoding proteins involved in photorespiration are not significantly decreased in leaves

The core photorespiratory cycle requires the eight enzymes (i) 2-phosphoglycolate phosphatase (PGLP), (ii) glycolate oxidase (GOX), (iii) glutamate:glyoxylate aminotransferase (GGT), (iv) the multienzyme glycine cleavage system (GDC) comprising three enzymes P-, T- and L-protein and the substrate H-protein, (v) serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT), (vi) serine:glyoxylate aminotransferase (SGT), (vii) hydroxypyruvate reductase (HPR1) and (viii) glycerate 3-kinase (GLYK) (Bauwe et al., 2010; Dellero et al., 2016). Transcriptome and protein comparisons of C3 and C4 species found the components of photorespiration to be significantly higher in C3 than in C4 species (e.g. Cleome, Bräutigam et al., 2011; Flaveria, Gowik et al., 2011; Mallmann et al., 2014). In contrast, in the C4 leaves of S. soda, the levels of transcripts coding for only two photorespiratory enzymes were significantly decreased compared with Cot: glycine decarboxylase P-Protein 2 and three isoforms of serine:glyoxylate aminotransferase (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S5). Although the abundance of transcripts encoding most other photorespiratory proteins appears to decrease in leaves compared to Cot, these changes are not significant (Supplementary Table S5).

K-means clustering reveals possible allies of known C4 pathway components

To discover additional processes and genes that might be C4-related, transcriptome data of all five developmental stages of S. soda were clustered via K-means clustering. From a total of 20 clusters (Supplementary Fig. S1), some show no clear pattern (clusters 5, 9, 14, 15 and 16). Three clusters show a yS stage-related pattern (i.e. high expression in yS compared to other stages): cluster 8 enriched with GO processes ‘ribosomal small subunit biogenesis’, ‘ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis’ and ‘translation’, cluster 11 enriched with GO processes ‘protein deneddylation’, ‘cullin deneddylation’ and ‘nucleocytoplasmic transport’ and cluster 20 with no enriched GO terms (Supplementary Table S6). Cluster 19 shows an oL stage-related pattern (i.e. high expression in oL compared to other stages), enriched in GO terms such as ‘cellular response to biotic stimulus’, ‘cellular response to molecule of bacterial origin’ and ‘programmed cell death’ (Supplementary Table S7). Five clusters show a possible C4-related pattern either with lower transcript levels in stages 1L and 2L compared to Cot (cluster 1 and 18) or higher levels in stages 1L and 2L compared to Cot (clusters 2, 3 and 7) (Fig. 7). Enriched GO processes in the Cot clusters 1 (including 746 genes) and 18 (including 632 genes) are related to cell wall synthesis and modification (e.g. ‘pectin catabolic process’, ‘galacturonan metabolic process’ and ‘pectin metabolic process’) and photorespiration (Supplementary Table S8). Cluster 2 (including 936 genes) shows no significantly enriched GO process. Cluster 3 (including 594 genes) shows two enriched GO terms, ‘L-serine metabolic process’ and ‘L-serine biosynthetic process’ (Fig. 7, Supplementary Table S9). Cluster 7 (including 1380 genes) shows many enriched GO terms, with the top five terms (ranked according to highest enrichment) related to photosynthesis, i.e. ‘photosynthesis, dark reaction’, ‘reductive pentose-phosphate cycle’, ‘ribonucleoside catabolic process’, ‘photosystem I assembly’ and ‘photosynthesis, light reaction’ (Supplementary Table S9).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Five of 20 clusters from k-means analysis with C4 related expression pattern. All 20 clusters are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1.

Cluster 3 includes many genes encoding C4 cycle enzymes such as PEPC1 and PEPC2, NADP-MDH, Asp-AT5, NADP-ME isoforms 1, 2 and 4, Ala-AT1, PPdK, DiT2, BASS2 and BASS4, PPT1/CUE1 and PPT2, AMK2, and PPdK-RP1 and PPdK-RP2. Consequently, we carefully investigated the other genes included in cluster 3 and found two promising genes that code for transporters/transport-related proteins that might be involved in C4. The transcript encoding triose phosphate/phosphate translocator-related protein (TPT-related; AT1G43310) is significantly more abundant (log2FC between 2.4 and 2.8) in all leaf stages compared to Cot. Transcripts coding for two other proteins with transport activity are also significantly increased (log2FC between 1.6 and 2.6) in leaves compared to Cot: phosphate transporter4.1 (PHT4.1; AT2G29650) and PHT4.4 (AT4G00370), also known as anion transporter (ANTR) 1 and ANTR2, respectively.

Increased abundance of transcripts encoding pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDH kinase; AT3G06483) is also significant (log2FC between 1.9 and 2.2) in all leaf stages compared to Cot. PDH kinase is thought to control metabolite exit from the C4 pathway via pyruvate decarboxylation for entry into citric acid cycle, and transcripts encoding the protein were increased in Megathyrsus maximus, a NAD-ME subtype C4 species (Bräutigam et al., 2014). Our data indicate this is not to be limited to NAD-ME species, and PDH kinase may be required for the C4 pathway in general. Similarly, levels of mRNA coding for the enzyme asparagine synthetase 3 (ASN3; AT5G10240) are also significantly increased in all leaf stages compared to Cot (log2FC between 3.7 and 5.7).

To find possible candidates responsible for the regulatory mechanism(s) behind the transition from C3 to C4 in S. soda photosynthetic organs, we looked at the abundance of transcripts encoding transcription factors in the C4-related clusters 1, 2, 3, 7, and 18 (Supplementary Table S10). In total, mRNA levels of 87 transcription factors were either significantly decreased (32) or increased (55) between Cot and 1L plus 2L stages (Supplementary Table S10).

Discussion

Anatomy and carbon isotope ratios give first hints to C3 cotyledons and C4 leaves in Salsola soda

When we initially looked at cross sections of cotyledons and leaves of S. soda, we expected to find a salsoloid type C4 anatomy in both organs, since this was previously reported in the literature (Pyankov et al., 2001b). In contrast, we found an undifferentiated C3 chlorenchyma surrounding a weakly developed central water storage tissue in cotyledons, while leaves showed salsoloid C4 anatomy typical of the C4-rich lineage Salsoleae to which S. soda belongs (Carolin et al., 1975; Carraro et al., 1993; Pyankov et al., 2001b; Voznesenskaya et al., 2013; Schüssler et al., submitted).

Consistent with our anatomical findings, stable carbon isotope discrimination measurements of ten different developmental stages showed young cotyledons have a C4-like δ 13C even though no C4 pathway is functional. This is because they develop using carbon stored in the seed; carbon fixed by an adult plant via the C4 pathway. The dry seed probably has a more negative δ 13C value, compared to the imbibed seeds, because of its large lipid fraction, which was shown to have lower δ 13C than other fractions/parts of the plant (Park and Epstein, 1961). A C3-like δ 13C value cannot be measured in cotyledons until they are mature, when carbon assimilation is fully functional, and stored lipids are nearly depleted. The young first leaf pair, even if performing C4, has a C3 carbon isotope signature, since it was built with carbon fixed by cotyledon C3. A C4-like δ 13C value can be measured at the stage when the first leaf is fully expanded and mature. These results clearly show that the type of photosynthesis being carried out at a particular developmental stage is not necessarily reflected in concurrent carbon isotope measurements.

Salsola soda developmental transcriptomes show stage-specific gene expression

Transcriptome sequencing of five different developmental stages of S. soda revealed insights into gene expression patterns of the different photosynthetic organs and/or stages including information on DGE of C3 and C4 in cotyledons and leaves. While the transcriptomes of the first and second leaves were very similar, all other stages were clearly distinct from each other (Fig. 3A, B). The young seedling stage was distinguished by transcripts encoding proteins involved in the glyoxylate cycle and mobilization of storage lipids, processes characteristic of seed germination and post-germination seedling stages. In cotyledons, transcripts coding for proteins of biosynthetic processes like pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis and photosynthesis were increased in abundance compared to young seedlings, indicating an active photoautotrophic mode of growth, mostly independent of lipids and proteins stored in the seed. While transcripts encoding RuBisCO were present in cotyledons, transcripts for all known enzymes and transporters of the C4 pathway were barely detectable. In contrast, the transcriptional programme of a C4 NADP-ME subtype was clearly represented in leaves. Importantly, we found that transcript abundance of the C4 key enzyme PEPC is consistent with PEPC protein amount. Thus, S. soda PEPC appears to be an example of where gene expression at the transcript and protein levels correlate (Ponnala et al., 2014; Vélez-Bermúdez and Schmidt, 2014). Relative to the first and second leaf pairs, leaves of an adult plant demonstrated an increase in transcripts coding for proteins of biotic stress and stimulus response-related pathways. During the entire growth period, abiotic growth conditions were stable, and consequently, we can rule out possible abiotic stressors. Alternatively, increased abundance of transcripts encoding proteins involved in stimulus-related responses could be caused by the advanced age/maturity of oL stage; namely leaf senescence could have already been initiated. In Arabidopsis, leaf senescence can result in activation of signalling pathways also connected to stress responses (Lim et al., 2007; Guo and Gan, 2012). During leaf senescence an activation of signalling pathways related to production of the plant hormones ABA, jasmonic acid, or salicylic acid and to programmed cell death was found (Morris et al., 2000; Breeze et al., 2011; Lim et al., 2007). Interestingly, among the significantly enriched GO terms from the transcript pool of the oL stage were salicylic acid-mediated and also processes related to regulation of cell death (Supplementary Table S4).

Some C4 species such as maize, which have been historically considered as NADP-ME subtypes actually use two decarboxylation enzymes: NADP-ME, which produces CO2 and pyruvate, and PEP-CK, which decarboxylates oxaloacetate, releasing CO2 and PEP (Walker et al., 1997; Pick et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2014). Furbank (2011) hypothesized that mixed decarboxylation pathways could be present in many C4 plants characterized as NADP-ME subtype. In S. soda, however, all three leaf stages had only high levels of NADP-ME transcripts. An increased abundance of PEP-CK transcripts was found in cotyledons, where the enzyme functions as part of gluconeogenesis. Taken together, our results suggest that S. soda exclusively uses NADP-ME as the primary decarboxylase. This is supported by results of enzyme assays and western blots of PEP-CK that also revealed NADP-ME-only decarboxylation in S. soda (Koteyeva et al., 2015), and is in agreement with the situation in bona fide C4Flaveria species and Sorghum bicolor (Gowik et al., 2011; Döring et al., 2016) that also rely only on NADP-ME. Interestingly, it was recently reported that the Salsoleae species H. ammodendron not only relies on the NADP-ME pathway, but additionally performs NAD-ME type C4 (Li et al., 2015), indicating the capability to develop different types of C4 within the Salsoleae.

Photorespiration is thought to be lower in C4 plants than C3 species, because of the CO2 concentration mechanism and the accompanying decrease in RuBisCO oxygenase activity. Comparisons of C3 with C4 species showed a significant decrease in transcripts coding for photorespiratory proteins as well as a decrease in the actual protein abundance in the C4 species (Mallmann et al., 2014). We see the same tendency for most transcripts encoding photorespiratory proteins in S. soda although most of these changes are not significant, with the exception of transcripts encoding a GDC P-protein and three serine:glyoxylate aminotransferases (cluster 1, Fig. 7, Supplemental Table S5). A similar tendency was observed when the transcriptomes of cotyledons and assimilating shoots of H. ammodendron were compared—the vast majority of photorespiratory genes were down-regulated only moderately in the C4 compared to the C3 tissue (Li et al., 2015). An explanation of these findings in S. soda could be that, at the time of sampling, the cotyledons were not fully developed, resulting in a lower photosynthetic and hence a lower photorespiratory activity. However, the C3-like δ 13C value of mature cotyledons as well as the levels of RubisCO and other photosynthetic transcripts indicate active C3 at this stage (Figs 2, 4).

New possible C4 allies

Leaf transcriptomes from closely related species performing different types of photosynthetic biochemistry have greatly expanded our knowledge of the proteins needed for the efficient functioning of C4 (e.g. Bräutigam et al., 2011; Gowik et al., 2011; van den Bergh et al., 2014; Külahoglu et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2015; Aubry et al., 2016). However, gaps remain in our understanding of these processes. In the current study, we identified novel transcripts that could be related to the C4 pathway. These transcripts showed similar expression patterns to those coding for known C4 enzymes, C4-related transporters and C4-related regulatory proteins, i.e. they are more or less absent in C3 cotyledons, but highly abundant in C4 leaves.

Newly proposed C4 candidates include two proteins of the PHT4 family, PHT4.1 and PHT4.4, which were thought to be involved in the transport of inorganic phosphate between the cytosol and chloroplasts (Roth et al., 2004; Guo et al., 2008; Linka and Weber, 2010). Recently, however, Miyaji and colleagues (2015) showed that PHT4.4 functions as an ascorbate transporter in Arabidopsis, moving ascorbate from the cytosol into the stroma of chloroplast. They further proposed that PHT4.1 transports ascorbate from the stroma into the thylakoids, hence the transporters work together to control the dynamic state of ascorbate in chloroplasts. This is important as ascorbic acid is a non-enzymatic component that scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Yamane et al., 2012), and high ascorbate levels are required to overcome photoinhibition/photostress (Miyaji et al., 2015). It has been shown that some C4 plants of the NADP-ME type have a low PSII:PSI ratio in BS thylakoids, which mostly conduct cyclic electron transport, while M thylakoids exhibit a complete linear electron transport chain (Meierhoff and Westhoff, 1993; reviewed in Majeran and van Wijk, 2009). The presence of linear electron transfer in the M and the concurrent absence of most photorespiratory reactions in this compartment (Kubicki et al., 1996; Döring et al., 2016) could lead to the production of ROS in the M especially under stress conditions (Miller et al., 2010). Apart from photorespiration, protection against ROS could be accomplished by antioxidant components like ascorbate, enriched in M chloroplasts by means of PHT4.4 and PHT4.1. While it is tempting to project a role for PHT4.4 and PHT4.1 in protection against photostress in the M cells of NADP-ME C4 species, further analysis is necessary to elucidate the significance of these transporters for the C4 metabolism, interestingly, PHT4.4 was found enriched in M chloroplast envelopes of the C4 plant maize (Majeran and van Wijk, 2009).

Additionally, we found a transcript of a TPT-related protein significantly more abundant in leaf stages compared to Cot. The TPT has been shown to be involved in C4 transport processes exchanging 3-phosphoglycerate and triose phosphate between BS and M chloroplasts (Flügge, 1999; Bräutigam et al., 2008). However, whether the TPT-related protein is involved in the regulation of TPT or is a transport protein by itself needs to be further investigated.

Another gene showing a C4-like expression pattern in S. soda encodes the asparagine synthetase ASN3. In general, asparagine synthetases function in ammonium metabolism in the cytosol of leaf and root cells. Asparagine is a key compound for nitrogen transport and storage, because of its high nitrogen:carbon ratio (Lam et al., 1996). It is well known that C4 plants have a better nitrogen use efficiency compared to C3 plants due to their reduced need for Calvin-Benson cycle and photorespiratory enzymes (Long, 1999). It was shown that this leads to a reduction of the protein synthesis machinery as well to the amino acid and overall nitrogen metabolism in the leaves of C4 plants (Bräutigam et al., 2011; Gowik et al., 2011). The changes in expression of genes related to asparagine and phosphoserine metabolism observed in our transcriptome analysis might be connected to adaptations in nitrogen metabolism after the switch from C3 to C4.

While some cis-regulatory elements involved in the expression of the core C4 genes were identified in the past (Marshall et al., 1997, Gowik et al., 2004, Williams et al., 2016), our knowledge of C4 transcription factors is very limited. Since the co-expression analysis found all core C4 genes in one common cluster (cluster 3, Fig. 7), it is tempting to consider the transcription factors found in this cluster to be putative regulators of these C4 genes. Interestingly, several homeobox domain genes were found in cluster 3 and homeobox domain proteins were identified previously as potential regulators of the C4 PEPC gene in Flaveria (Windhövel et al., 2001).

Why C3 in cotyledons in the first place?

Our analyses clearly show that cotyledons of S. soda perform C3 while a switch to the C4 pathway occurs in leaves. This transition, observable in the same individual plant and enabled by the same genome, makes S. soda an excellent candidate to study the molecular developmental changes underlying the switch. A fundamental question is: why does S. soda use different pathways in the two photosynthetically active organs? The embryo within the seed of S. soda is very large (ML, personal observation), suggesting that cotyledons do not contribute to carbon assimilation and energy gain in S. soda at all, and the occurrence of C3 in cotyledons is an evolutionary relict. However, carbon isotope data refute this suggestion in that cotyledons assimilate carbon via C3 to such an extent that a C3-like δ13C signature is detected in the young first leaf (Fig. 2). Furthermore, we observed that cotyledons are long-lived organs in S. soda, appearing to be still photosynthetically active when the first leaf pair reaches the mature stage.

Our rationale for C3 metabolism in cotyledons of S. soda is that C3 provides a selective advantage through lower metabolic costs than C4. Salsola soda is found at the shores around the Mediterranean Sea to Central Asia (Freitag, 1997), and seeds of S. soda germinate in spring, in temperate environmental conditions, i.e. moderate temperature and precipitation, compared to the rest of the annual growing period. Under these conditions the costs of C3, even with the associated photorespiratory activity, are lower than operating a C4 cycle (Ehleringer et al., 1991). Additionally, low or moderate temperatures result in a lower quantum yield in plants using C4 compared to C3 metabolism (Ehleringer, 1978). Hence S. soda conducts C3 in cotyledons because C3 outperforms C4 in the environmental conditions present at germination and during the first days/weeks of the seedling stages, whereas C4 becomes environmentally advantageous from the first leaf stage onwards, when temperatures and light intensity are higher. The results of the current study certainly support this hypothesis. Comparative developmental studies, including monitoring environmental conditions, between S. soda and closely related species in which both cotyledons and leaves use either C3 or C4 would further resolve the potential advantage(s) of the C3 to C4 transition demonstrated by S. soda.

In summary, we were able to provide evidence that S. soda conducts C3 in cotyledons before it switches to C4 in leaves. Salsola soda has ideal features to be an additional model plant for studying the genetic background and the biochemical assembly of setting up the C4 pathway: an annual life cycle, easy and fast to grow in the greenhouse, production of many seeds per plant each year, seeds with a high germination rate (in the first year), and the switch from C3 to C4 occurs within a single species and individual (i.e. identical genome).

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Figure S1. K-means clustering (K=20 clusters) of all transcripts in all five stages.

Table S1. List of carbon isotope values of ten stages including technical triplicates (see Fig. 2).

Table S2. Data availability of raw short read data of all samples uploaded to National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive.

Table S3. Mapping of reads, transcript abundance and statistical tests of differential gene expression.

Table S4. Enriched GO (gene ontology) terms highly represented in one stage (first column) compared to a certain other stage (second column).

Table S5. Expression pattern of genes involved in glyoxylate cycle, photosynthesis, photorespiration and C4 photosynthesis in the five developmental stages.

Table S6. Enriched GO (gene ontology) terms in yS-related clusters 8 and 11.

Table S7. Enriched GO (gene ontology) terms in oL-related cluster 19.

Table S8. Enriched GO (gene ontology) terms in Cot-related clusters 1 and 18 (see Fig. 7).

Table S9. Enriched GO (gene ontology) terms in C4-related clusters 3 and 7 (see Fig. 7).

Table S10. Transcriptions factors (TF) included in k-means clusters 1, 2, 3, 7, and 18 that show decreased (clusters 1 and 18) or increased transcript levels (clusters 2, 3 and 7) in 1L and 2L compared to Cot (FDR q-value ≤0.01).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_Figure_S1
Supplementary_Table_S1
Supplementary_Table_S2
Supplementary_Table_S3
Supplementary_Table_S4
Supplementary_Table_S5
Supplementary_Table_S6
Supplementary_Table_S7
Supplementary_Table_S8
Supplementary_Table_S9
Supplementary_Table_S10

Acknowledgements

We thank Mitja Kaligaric and Nina Sajna for collecting individual plants from populations of Salsola soda in Croatia and Italy, and Christopher Wild (Botanical Garden at University Mainz) for his support during plant growth in the greenhouse. We thank the ‘Genomics and Transcriptomics laboratory’ of the ‘Biologisch-Medizinischen Forschungszentrum’ (BMFZ) at the Heinrich-Heine-University of Duesseldorf (Germany) for technical support and conducting the Illumina sequencing. We thank our artists D. Franke and M. Geyer for the help with the illustrations, both from the University of Mainz, Germany.

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft with grants to GK, the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) with travel grants to ML, and the Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS).

References

  1. Aubry S, Aresheva O, Reyna-Llorens I, Smith-Unna RD, Hibberd JM, Genty B. 2016. Effects of drought on gene expression in maize reproductive and leaf meristem tissue revealed by RNA-Seq. Plant Physiology 170, 1345–1357.26818731 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauwe H, Hagemann M, Fernie AR. 2010. Photorespiration: players, partners and origin. Trends in Plant Science 15, 330–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bohley K, Joos O, Hartmann HEK, Sage RF, Liede-Schumann S, Kadereit G. 2015. Phylogeny of Sesuvioideae (Aizoaceae) – Biogeography, leaf anatomy and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 17, 116–130. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bräutigam A, Hofmann-Benning S, Weber APM. 2008. Comparative proteomics of chloroplast envelopes from C3 and C4 plants reveals specific adaptations of the plastid envelope to C4 photosynthesis and candidate proteins required for maintaining C4 metabolite fluxes. Plant Physiol 148, 568–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bräutigam A, Kajala K, Wullenweber J, et al. 2011. An mRNA blueprint for C4 photosynthesis derived from comparative transcriptomics of closely related C3 and C4 species. Plant Physiology 155, 142–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bräutigam A, Schliesky S, Külahoglu C, Osborne CP, Weber APM. 2014. Towards an integrative model of C4 photosynthetic subtypes: insights from comparative transcriptome analysis of NAD-ME, NADP-ME, and PEP-CK C4 species. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 3579–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Breeze E, Harrison E, McHattie S, et al. 2011. High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation. The Plant Cell 23, 873–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carolin RC, Jacobs SWL, Vesk M. 1975. Leaf structure in Chenopodiaceae. Botanisches Jahrbuch für Systematische Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 95, 226–255. [Google Scholar]
  10. Carraro L, Patrignani G, Iacumin P, Orsenigo M. 1993. Leaf morphology and carbon isotope discrimination in members of the genus Salsola. II. Studies on Salsola soda L. Caryologia 46, 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cernusak L a, Ubierna N, Winter K, Holtum J a M, Marshall JD, Farquhar GD. 2013. Environmental and physiological determinants of carbon isotope discrimination in terrestrial plants. New Phytologist 200, 950–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Craig H. 1957. Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 12, 133–149. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dellero Y, Jossier M, Schmitz J, Maurino VG, Hodges M. 2016. Photorespiratory glycolate–glyoxylate metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany, erw090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding Z, Weissmann S, Wang M, et al. 2015. Identification of photosynthesis-associated C4 candidate genes through comparative leaf gradient transcriptome in multiple lineages of C3 and C4 species. PLOS ONE 10, e0140629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Döring F, Streubel M, Bräutigam A, Gowik U. 2016. Most photorespiratory genes are preferentially expressed in the bundle sheath cells of the C4 grass Sorghum bicolor. Journal of Experimental Botany, erw041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eden E, Lipson D, Yogev S, Yakhini Z. 2007. Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences. PLoS Computational Biology 3, e39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. 2009. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Edwards GE, Franceschi VR, Voznesenskaya EV. 2004. Single-cell C4 photosynthesis versus the dual-cell (Kranz) paradigm. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55, 173–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Edwards GE, Voznesenskaya EV. 2011. C4 photosynthesis: Kranz forms and single-cell C4 in terrestrial plants. In: Raghavendra AS, Sage RF, eds.. C4 Photosynthesis and Related CO2 Concentrating Mechanisms. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 29–61. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ehleringer JR. 1978. Implications of quantum yield differences on the distributions of C3 and C4 grasses. Oecologia 31, 255–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ehleringer JR, Sage RF, Flanagan LB, Pearcy RW. 1991. Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6, 95–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95, 14863–14868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Flügge U-I. 1999. Phosphate translocators in plastids. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 50, 27–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Freitag H. 1997. Salsola L. (Chenopodiaceae). In: Rechinger K.H. (ed.) Flora Iranica. Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, Graz-Austria, pp. 154–255. [Google Scholar]
  25. Furbank RT. 2011. Evolution of the C4 photosynthetic mechanism: are there really three C4 acid decarboxylation types?Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 3103–3108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gowik U, Bräutigam A, Weber KL, Weber APM, Westhoff P. 2011. Evolution of C4 photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria: how many and which genes does it take to make C4?The Plant Cell 23, 2087–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gowik U, Burscheidt J, Akyildiz M, Schlue U, Koczor M, Streubel M, Westhoff P. 2004. cis-regulatory elements for mesophyll-specific gene expression in the C4 plant Flaveria trinervia, the promoter of the C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene. The Plant Cell 16, 1077–1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gowik U, Westhoff P. 2011. The path from C3 to C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 155, 56–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo B, Jin Y, Wussler C, Blancaflor EB, Motes CM, Versaw WK. 2008. Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis PHT4 family of intracellular phosphate transporters. New Phytologist 177, 889–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Guo Y, Gan SS. 2012. Convergence and divergence in gene expression profiles induced by leaf senescence and 27 senescence-promoting hormonal, pathological and environmental stress treatments. Plant, Cell & Environment 35, 644–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hatch MD, Slack CR. 1966. Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. The Biochemical Journal 101, 103–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hibberd JM, Covshoff S. 2010. The regulation of gene expression required for C4 photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 181–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kadereit G, Ackerly D, Pirie MD. 2012. A broader model for C4 photosynthesis evolution in plants inferred from the goosefoot family (Chenopodiaceae s.s.). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 3304–3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kadereit G, Borsch T, Weising K, Freitag H. 2003. Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164, 959–986. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kadereit G, Freitag H. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of Camphorosmeae: implications for biogeography, evolution of C4-photosynthesis and taxonomy. Taxon 60, 51–78. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kadereit G, Lauterbach M, Pirie MD, Arafeh R, Freitag H. 2014. When do different C4 leaf anatomies indicate independent C4 origins? Parallel evolution of C4 leaf types in Camphorosmeae (Chenopodiaceae). Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 3499–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kent WJ. 2002. BLAT – the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Research, 656–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Koteyeva NK, Voznesenskaya EV, Edwards GE. 2015. An assessment of the capacity for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase to contribute to C4 photosynthesis. Plant Science 235, 70–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kubicki A, Funk E, Westhoff P, Steinmüller K. 1996. Differential expression of plastome-encoded ndh genes in mesophyll and bundle-sheath chloroplasts of the C4 plant Sorghum bicolor indicates that the complex I-homologous NAD(P)H-plastoquinone oxidoreductase is involved in cyclic electron transport. Planta 199, 276–281. [Google Scholar]
  40. Külahoglu C, Denton AK, Sommer M, et al. 2014. Comparative transcriptome atlases reveal altered gene expression modules between two Cleomaceae C3 and C4 plant species. The Plant Cell 26, 3243–3260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lam H-M, Coschigano KT, Oliveira IC, Melo-Oliveira R, Coruzzi GM. 1996. The molecular-genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 569–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Langdale JA. 2011. C4 cycles: past, present, and future research on C4 photosynthesis. The Plant Cell 23, 3879–3892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lauterbach M, van der Merwe PDW, Keßler L, Pirie MD, Bellstedt DU, Kadereit G. 2016. Evolution of leaf anatomy in arid environments – a case study in southern African Tetraena and Roepera (Zygophyllaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 97, 129–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leegood RC, Ap Rees T. 1978. Phosphoenolypyruvate carboxykinase and gluconeogenesis in cotyledons of Cucurbita pepo. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 524, 207–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li Y, Ma X, Zhao J, Xu J, Shi J, Zhu X-G, Zhao Y, Zhang H. 2015. Developmental genetic mechanisms of C4 syndrome based on transcriptome analysis of C3 cotyledons and C4 assimilating shoots in Haloxylon ammodendron. Plos One 10, e0117175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lim PO, Kim HJ, Gil Nam H. 2007. Leaf Senescence. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58, 115–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Linka N, Weber APM. 2010. Intracellular metabolite transporters in plants. Molecular Plant 3, 21–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Long SP. 1999. Environmental Responses. In: Sage RF, Monson RK, eds. C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press: San Diego, 215–249 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ludwig M, von Caemmerer S, Dean Price G, Badger MR, Furbank RT. 1998. Expression of tobacco carbonic anhydrase in the C4 dicot Flaveria bidentis leads to increased leakiness of the bundle sheath and a defective CO2-concentrating mechanism. Plant Physiology 117, 1071–1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Majeran W, van Wijk KJ. 2009. Cell-type-specific differentiation of chloroplasts in C4 plants. Trends in Plant Science 14, 100–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mallmann J, Heckmann D, Bräutigam A, Lercher MJ, Weber APM, Westhoff P, Gowik U. 2014. The role of photorespiration during the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria. eLife 2014, 1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Marshall JS, Stubbs JD, Chitty JA, Surin B, Taylor WC. 1997. Expression of the C4 Me1 gene from Flaveria bidentis requires an interaction between 5’ and 3’ sequences. The Plant Cell 9, 1515–1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Martinez JF, Monte E, Quail PH. 1999. A simple, rapid and quantitative method for preparing Arabidopsis protein extracts for immunoblot analysis. The Plant Journal 20, 251–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Meierhoff K, Westhoff P. 1993. Differential biogenesis of photosystem II in mesophyll and bundle-sheath cells of monocotyledonous NADP-malic enzyme-type C4 plants: the non-stoichiometric abundance of the subunits of photosystem II in the bundle-sheath chloroplasts and the translational. Planta 191, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  56. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R. 2010. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 453–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Miyaji T, Kuromori T, Takeuchi Y, et al. 2015. AtPHT4;4 is a chloroplast-localized ascorbate transporter in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 6, 5928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Morris K, Mackerness SA-H, Page T, John CF, Murphy AM, Carr JP, Buchanan-Wollaston V. 2000. Salicylic acid has a role in regulating gene expression during leaf senescence. The Plant Journal 23, 677–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. O’Leary MH. 1981. Carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Phytochemistry 20, 553–567. [Google Scholar]
  60. O’Leary B, Park J, Plaxton WC. 2011. The remarkable diversity of plant PEPC (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase): recent insights into the physiological functions and post-translational controls of non-photosynthetic PEPCs. Biochemical Journal 436, 15–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Park R, Epstein S. 1961. Metabolic fractionation of C13 & C12 in plants. Plant Physiology 36, 133–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pick TR, Bräutigam A, Schlüter U, et al. 2011. Systems analysis of a maize leaf developmental gradient redefines the current C4 model and provides candidates for regulation. The Plant Cell 23, 4208–4220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ponnala L, Wang Y, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ. 2014. Correlation of mRNA and protein abundance in the developing maize leaf. The Plant Journal 78, 424–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pyankov VI, Artyusheva EG, Edwards GE, Black CC, Soltis PS. 2001a Phylogenetic analysis of tribe Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) based on ribosomal ITS sequences: implications for the evolution of photosynthesis types. American Journal of Botany 88, 1189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pyankov VI, Black CC, Artyusheva EG, Voznesenskaya E V, Ku MSB, Edwards GE. 1999. Features of photosynthesis in Haloxylon species of Chenopodiaceae that are dominant plants in Central Asian deserts. Plant and Cell Physiology 40, 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pyankov VI, Voznesenskaya EV, Kuz’min AN, Ku MSB, Ganko E, Franceschi VR, Black CC, Edwards GE. 2000. Occurrence of C3 and C4 photosynthesis in cotyledons and leaves of Salsola species (Chenopodiaceae). Photosynthesis Research 63, 69–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pyankov VI, Ziegler H, Kuz’min AN, Edwards GE. 2001b Origin and evolution of C4 photosynthesis in the tribe Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) based on anatomical and biochemical types in leaves and cotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution 230, 43–74. [Google Scholar]
  68. R Core Team 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: https://www.R-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  69. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Roth C, Menzel G, Petetot JM-C, Rochat-Hacker S, Poirier Y. 2004. Characterization of a protein of the plastid inner envelope having homology to animal inorganic phosphate, chloride and organic-anion transporters. Planta 218, 406–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sage RF. 2016. A portrait of the C4 photosynthetic family on the 50th anniversary of its discovery: species number, evolutionary lineages and Hall of Fame. Journal of Experimental Botany, erw156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sage RF, Sage TL, Pearcy RW, Borsch T. 2007. The taxonomic distribution of C4 photosynthesis in Amaranthaceae sensu stricto. American Journal of Botany 94, 1992–2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schütze P, Freitag H, Weising K. 2003. An integrated molecular and morphological study of the subfamily Suaedoideae Ulbr. (Chenopodiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 239, 257–286. [Google Scholar]
  74. Soukas A, Cohen P, Socci ND, Friedman JM. 2000. Leptin-specific patterns of gene expression in white adipose tissue. Genes & Development 14, 963–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schüssler C, Freitag H, Koteyeva N, Schmidt D, Edwards G, Voznesenskaya E, Kadereit G. 2017. Molecular phylogeny and forms of photosynthesis in tribe Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae). Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 207–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Thimm O, Bläsing OE, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Krüger P, Selbig J, Müller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M. 2004. mapman: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal 37, 914–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. van den Bergh E, Külahoglu C, Bräutigam A, Hibberd JM, Weber APM, Zhu X-G, Eric Schranz M. 2014. Gene and genome duplications and the origin of C4 photosynthesis: Birth of a trait in the Cleomaceae. Current Plant Biology 1, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  78. Vélez-Bermúdez IC, Schmidt W. 2014. The conundrum of discordant protein and mRNA expression. Are plants special?Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Voznesenskaya EV, Koteyeva NK, Akhani H, Roalson EH, Edwards GE. 2013. Structural and physiological analyses in Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) indicate multiple transitions among C3, intermediate, and C4 photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 3583–3604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Walker RP, Acheson RM, Tecsi LI, Leegood RC. 1997. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in C4 plants: its role and regulation. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24: 459–468. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang Y, Bräutigam A, Weber APM, Zhu X-G. 2014. Three distinct biochemical subtypes of C4 photosynthesis? A modelling analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 3567–3578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Weber APM, von Caemmerer S. 2010. Plastid transport and metabolism of C3 and C4 plants—comparative analysis and possible biotechnological exploitation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13, 256–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Williams BP, Burgess SJ, Reyna-Llorens I, Knerova J, Aubry S, Stanley S, Hibberd JM. 2016. An untranslated cis-element regulates the accumulation of multiple C4 enzymes in Gynandropsis gynandra mesophyll cells. The Plant Cell, TPC2015–00570–RA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Windhövel A, Hein I, Dabrowa R, Stockhaus J. 2001. Characterization of a novel class of plant homeodomain proteins that bind to the C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene of Flaveria trinervia. Plant Molecular Biology 45, 201–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Yamane K, Taniguchi M, Miyake H. 2012. Salinity-induced subcellular accumulation of H2O2 in leaves of rice. Protoplasma 249, 301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_Figure_S1
Supplementary_Table_S1
Supplementary_Table_S2
Supplementary_Table_S3
Supplementary_Table_S4
Supplementary_Table_S5
Supplementary_Table_S6
Supplementary_Table_S7
Supplementary_Table_S8
Supplementary_Table_S9
Supplementary_Table_S10

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES