Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence among 500 HIV-infected adults and 500 controls in Rakai, Uganda was 47%, and did not differ by HIV status. Male sex and chronic hepatitis B virus infection were associated with seroprevalence. One active infection was detected.
Keywords: hepatitis E virus, viral hepatitis, HEV seroprevalence, Uganda, Rakai
Abstract
A cross-sectional study was conducted of 500 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults frequency matched on age, sex, and community to 500 HIV-uninfected individuals in the Rakai District, Uganda to evaluate seroprevalence of anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) IgG antibodies. HEV seroprevalence was 47%, and 1 HIV-infected individual was actively infected with a genotype 3 virus. Using modified Poisson regression, male sex (prevalence ratios [PR] = 1.247; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.071–1.450) and chronic hepatitis B virus infection (PR = 1.377; 95% CI, 1.090–1.738) were associated with HEV seroprevalence. HIV infection status (PR = 0.973; 95% CI, 0.852–1.111) was not associated with HEV seroprevalence. These data suggest there is a large burden of prior exposure to HEV in rural Uganda.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an enterically transmitted virus that primarily causes mild or asymptomatic self-limiting disease. However, it can cause severe disease in pregnant women, with mortality rates up to 20% [1]. HEV is responsible for large outbreaks, often associated with flooding and poor sanitation in developing countries, but sporadic cases have also been reported. Genotype 1 and 2 HEV infections are often associated with large outbreaks and more severe disease in developing countries as compared to genotype 3 infections, which are more often associated with sporadic and more mild infections, often in developed countries [2]. There have been a limited number of studies on the seroprevalence and genotype distributions of HEV in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly outside of outbreak settings [3, 4]. Reports of HEV in Uganda have been limited to those of outbreaks of genotype 1 infections, and genotype distribution and seroprevalence of HEV outside of outbreaks has gone unreported. Additionally, there have been conflicting reports about the association of HEV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the literature [3]. Here, we sought to investigate the correlates of prior exposure to and current infection with HEV in the rural Rakai District of Uganda including any potential relationship with HIV status.
METHODS
Study Design and Participants
The design of this study has been previously described in detail [5]. This cross-sectional study was performed in Rakai District, Uganda from 2008 to 2009. Five-hundred HIV-infected patients were recruited from 5 HIV program clinics. Patients were frequency matched on age, sex, and community to 500 HIV-uninfected participants identified from the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS), an ongoing prospective population-based cohort of more than 10000 adults [6]. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was approved by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Western IRB (Olympia, WA), the Scientific and Ethics Committee of the Uganda Virus Research Institute, and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT00782158).
Laboratory Assays
HEV immunoglobulin G (IgG) serology was conducted using an in-house sandwich method enzyme immunoassay (EIA) designed to detect anti-HEV IgG in serum or plasma, as described previously [2]. Positive anti-HEV IgG status was defined by an optical density (OD) at, or above, the cut-off value plus 10% for that plate using the World Health Organization anti-HEV reference reagent (95/584).
All anti-HEV IgG-positive samples were subsequently tested for anti-HEV immunoglobulin M (IgM). Additionally, all anti-HEV IgG-negative samples collected from individuals infected with HIV and a CD4 cell count ≤200 cells/μL were tested for anti-HEV IgM to ensure immune status did not affect serology results [7]. HEV IgM serology was conducted using an in-house class-capture EIA designed to detect anti-HEV IgM specifically, in serum or plasma [8]. Positive anti-HEV IgM status was defined by an OD at, or above, the cut-off value, as described previously [8]. All HEV serology tests were run in duplicate on the same assay plate and discordant results were rerun for confirmation.
All samples positive for IgM anti-HEV, along with a random subset of samples with a high IgG anti-HEV titer, which may be indicative of more recent infection, or from HIV infected individuals with a CD4 count of less than 200 cells/μL, were tested for HEV RNA using a broadly reactive Taqman assay [9, 10]. Samples testing positive by Taqman assay were confirmed by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [11, 12]. Positive nested PCR products were sequenced, and a BLAST search of GenBank nucleotide sequences was performed to determine the viral genotype.
Biomarkers analyzed in the current study included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transferase (AST), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-schistosomiasis IgG, and HIV-1. Data on occupational status and alcohol use was obtained via interview [5].
Statistical Analyses
To compare results with previous publications in this same cohort, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) with robust variance using modified Poisson regression [13]. Age in years, AST (U/L), and ALT (U/L) were all analyzed as continuous variables in the models. Multivariable analyses included all variables with P value ≤ .1 in univariate analyses and age, which was determined a priori to have biological plausibility. Stata version 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for all statistical analyses.
RESULTS
Population Characteristics
Population characteristics stratified by HIV status are shown in Table 1. Briefly, approximately two-thirds of the study population were female and this did not differ significantly by HIV status. Median age was 37 among HIV-uninfected and 38 among HIV-infected participants, and this varied slightly by HIV status due to frequency matching. HIV-infected participants were more likely to have higher liver enzyme levels and lower eosinophil counts than HIV-uninfected participants. HIV-uninfected participants were less likely to have been previously infected with Schistosoma parasites compared to HIV-infected participants, but likelihood of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection did not differ by HIV status. Participants who were HIV-uninfected were more likely to use herbal medicines and less likely to be current alcohol users as compared to participants who were HIV-infected. Heavy alcohol use did not differ by HIV status. Reported occupation in fishing or agriculture did not differ by HIV status. Among participants infected with HIV, the median CD4 count was 450 cells/μL and 60% were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Table 1.
Population Characteristics by HIV Status
| Characteristica | HIV positive (n = 500) |
HIV negative (n = 500) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| n (% or IQR) | n (% or IQR) | P value | |
| Sex | .893 | ||
| Male | 166 (33) | 164 (33) | |
| Female | 334 (67) | 336 (67) | |
| Age (median years) | 38 (32–45) | 37 (32–45) | .025 |
| AST (median U/L) | 27 (22–35) | 23 (20–27) | <.001 |
| ALT (median U/L) | 22 (16–31) | 19 (15–25) | <.001 |
| Eosinophil count (median) | 5.6 (2.7–12.7) | 3.3 (1.8–6.6) | <.001 |
| cHBV (HBsAg positive) | .133 | ||
| Yes | 23 (5) | 14 (3) | |
| No | 477 (95) | 485 (97) | |
| Schistosomiasis IgG | .003 | ||
| Yes | 77 (15) | 46 (9) | |
| No | 423 (85) | 453 (91) | |
| Herbal medicine use | <.001 | ||
| Yes | 10 (2) | 464 (93) | |
| No | 490 (98) | 36 (7) | |
| Current alcohol use | .008 | ||
| Yes | 112 (22) | 79 (16) | |
| No | 388 (78) | 421 (84) | |
| Heavy alcohol use | .204 | ||
| Yes | 11 (2) | 9 (2) | |
| No | 489 (98) | 491 (98) | |
| Occupational fisherman | .101 | ||
| Yes | 5 (1) | 1 (0) | |
| No | 495 (99) | 499 (100) | |
| Agricultural occupation | .200 | ||
| Yes | 399 (80) | 380 (77) | |
| No | 100 (20) | 116 (23) | |
| ART | |||
| Yes | 302 (60) | ||
| No | 198 (40) | ||
| CD4 (median cells/μL) | 450 (319–643) | ||
Abbreviations: AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; cHBV, chronic hepatitis B virus infections; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; ART, antiretroviral therapy; IQR, interquartile range.
Data are n (%) or median (IQR).
HEV Serology and Nucleic Acid Test
HEV serology results were obtained for 985 participants due to 15 unavailable samples. Anti-HEV IgG serostatus did not significantly differ by HIV status. Specifically, among those not infected with HIV, 47.7% (234/491) were anti-HEV IgG positive and 46.4% (229/494) of persons living with HIV were anti-HEV IgG positive. Of the 985 samples tested for anti-HEV IgG, 463 samples (47%) tested positive for anti-HEV IgG (Table 2). Of 480 samples tested for anti-HEV IgM, 1 sample, which was positive for anti-HEV IgG, was positive for IgM. Of 41 samples that were tested for HEV RNA only the sample that was anti-HEV IgG and anti-HEV IgM positive was found to have detectable levels of HEV RNA by Taqman assay. The 280-base pair nucleotide sequence isolated from the RNA positive sample was compared with other HEV isolates in the NCBI database by BLAST analysis and was determined to be a genotype-3 virus. The partial open reading frame 1 (ORF1) sequence from this participant was submitted to the GenBank database under the accession number MF092844. The individual with detectable HEV RNA was a 45-year-old HIV-positive male receiving ART with a CD4 cell count of 154 cells/μL, elevated ALT (106.2 U/L) and AST (298.5 U/L) enzyme levels, without chronic HBV or schistosomiasis, and had no self-reported history of heavy drinking.
Table 2.
Correlates of Hepatitis E Virus IgG Seropositive Status
| Characteristic | Univariate PR (95% CI) | P value | Multivariable adjPR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex |
1.297
(1.138, 1.479) |
<.001 |
1.247
(1.071, 1.450) |
.004 |
| Age (years) | 1.002 (0.995, 1.010) |
.538 | 1.002 (0.994, 1.009) |
.647 |
| Agricultural occupation | 0.995 (0.846, 1.170) |
.948 | ||
| ALT (U/L) | 1.002 (0.999, 1.001) |
.094 | ||
| AST (U/L) |
1.002
(1.000, 1.001) |
.034 | 1.001 (1.000, 1.003) |
.128 |
| Occupational fisherman | 0.708 (0.228, 2.200) |
.550 | ||
| Schistosomiasis (IgG) | 1.095 (0.907, 1.323) |
.345 | ||
| Current alcohol use |
1.220
(1.050, 1.418) |
.009 | 1.033 (0.867, 1.231) |
.717 |
| HBsAg |
1.443
(1.134, 1.836) |
.003 |
1.377
(1.090, 1.738) |
.007 |
| HIV positive | 0.973 (0.852, 1.111) |
.683 |
PR estimates, 95% CIs, and P values determined using Poisson regression with robust variance.
Abbreviations: adjPR, adjusted prevalence ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate transferase; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PR, prevalence ratio.
Correlates of Anti-HEV IgG Seropositivity
In univariate analyses, male sex (PR = 1.297, P < .001), AST (PR = 1.002, P = .034), current alcohol use (PR = 1.220, P = .009), and chronic HBV infection (PR = 1.443, P = .003) were all associated with being anti-HEV IgG seropositive (Table 2). Age, agricultural occupation, occupational fishing, ALT, schistosomiasis, and HIV were not associated with antibodies to HEV. After adjustment for variables deemed important a priori (age) and in the univariate analyses, male sex (adjusted prevalence ratios [adjPR] = 1.247, P = .004), and chronic HBV infection (adjPR = 1.377, P = .007) remained significantly associated with prior exposure to HEV.
Discussion
There are limited data available on the prevalence of HEV-antibodies in sub-Saharan Africa outside of large outbreaks where there is a large coburden of HIV infection and liver disease [14]. However, HEV is known to cause waterborne outbreaks during floods in Asia, and has been reported in outbreaks among refugee populations without access to clean water in Africa [14]. Nearly half (47%) of this rural East African population was seropositive for anti-HEV IgG antibodies. Correlates of anti-HEV IgG antibodies included both male sex and chronic HBV infection. Male sex may be associated with specific occupational or environmental exposures that we were unable to capture in our study. The association with chronic HBV has been reported previously [3], and possibly reflects increased childhood risk because the majority of individuals in this population likely were infected with HBV at birth. Importantly, HIV was not associated with prior exposure to HEV in this population.
A large outbreak of HEV caused by a genotype 1 virus occurred in a population of refugees in Northern Uganda from October 2007 through August of 2009, resulting in more than 10000 cases and 160 deaths [3]. In this study anti-HEV IgM and HEV RNA could only be detected in 1 individual infected with a genotype 3 virus. While genotypes 1 and 2 are more often associated with outbreaks in developing countries, genotype 3 HEV has a global distribution with natural reservoirs in humans and animals such as swine, and is generally responsible for a milder clinical disease [1]. This genotype has not been previously reported in Uganda, and has been reported less frequently in Africa than genotype 1 [3, 4]. Data identifying occupational exposure to animals might help explain some of the prevalence of HEV in this community. Unfortunately, data in this study were limited to self-reported agricultural work without additional details of type of agricultural work or contact with animals. Despite the high seroprevalence of anti-HEV IgG, it is clear that neither active nor chronic HEV infections were common in this population at the time of sample collection.
This analysis has a number of limitations. This was a cross-sectional study design and the analysis was based on data collected previously to examine the relationship of HIV-status and liver stiffness, not the correlates of prior exposure to HEV. Therefore, temporal associations cannot be established, and data on critical variables important to the epidemiology of HEV are lacking, such as occupational exposure to animals or primary water source, which may be relevant to the mode of HEV transmission. Previous studies have reported mixed findings on the association of HEV and HIV or AIDS [3]. The average age of HEV infection in developing countries is late childhood or early adulthood [1]. In our study, HEV infection and clearance may have occurred prior to HIV infection in many of the HEV seroprevalent persons where the average age was approximately 38 years, therefore limiting our ability to examine the relationship between HEV infection among persons infected with HIV. Finally, the samples in this study were collected in 2008, and therefore do not necessarily reflect current HEV seropositivity in the Rakai District. More recent serosurveys among a broader age range would be helpful in defining the present burden of current and prior HEV infection in this population.
In this study we found a high prevalence of anti-HEV-IgG among rural Ugandans. There was little evidence of active or chronic HEV infection, despite a large outbreak of HEV occurring elsewhere in this country during the same time period. Male sex and chronic HBV infection were significantly associated with prior HEV exposure. These data suggest a large burden of exposure to HEV among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals in rural Eastern Africa, and that HIV infection was not associated with prior exposure to HEV.
Notes
Acknowledgments. We thank the laboratory and clinical staff at RHSP, for their excellence and dedication to this study. We thank Claro Yu for his invaluable advice, and the study participants whose commitment and cooperation made the study possible. We thank the Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology (OCICB), NIAID for data management support. Lastly, we thank Sarah Wendel for managing and shipping clinical samples. This article reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent FDA’s views or policies.
Financial support. This work was supported by primarily the United States National Institutes of Health Bench to Bedside Program (2008). Additional support was provided by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant number T32-DA-007292), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant number R01-AI-16078), and the American Cancer Society (grant number MRSG-07-284-01-CCE). The study was jointly conducted and benefited from close collaboration of researchers from the intramural National Institutes of Health Laboratories of Immunoregulation and Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Makerere University, and the Rakai Health Sciences Program. Support for the RHSP HIV Care Program was provided by the President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief and support for the Rakai Cohort Study was provided by the Department of the Army, United States Army Medical Research and Material Command Cooperative Agreement (grant number DAMD17-98-2-8007); National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant numbers R01-AI-34826 and R01-AI-34265); and National Institute of Child and Health Development (grant number 5P30-HD-06826). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Previous presentation. Part of this work was presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, poster High Prevalence of anti-HEV IgG is Not Associated with HIV Infection in Rakai, Uganda, February, 2016, Boston, Massachusetts.
References
- 1. Purcell RH, Engle RE, Govindarajan S et al. Pathobiology of hepatitis E: lessons learned from primate models. Emerg Microbes Infect 2013; 2:e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kuniholm MH, Purcell RH, McQuillan GM, Engle RE, Wasley A, Nelson KE. Epidemiology of hepatitis E virus in the United States: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Infect Dis 2009; 200:48–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kim JH, Nelson KE, Panzner U, Kasture Y, Labrique AB, Wierzba TF. A systematic review of the epidemiology of hepatitis E virus in Africa. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kim JH, Nelson KE, Panzner U, Kasture Y, Labrique AB, Wierzba TF. Erratum to: A systematic review of the epidemiology of hepatitis E virus in Africa. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Stabinski L, Reynolds SJ, Ocama P et al. ;Rakai Health Sciences Program. High prevalence of liver fibrosis associated with HIV infection: a study in rural Rakai, Uganda. Antivir Ther 2011; 16:405–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wawer MJ, Gray RH, Sewankambo NK et al. A randomized, community trial of intensive sexually transmitted disease control for AIDS prevention, Rakai, Uganda. AIDS 1998; 12:1211–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kenfak-Foguena A, Schöni-Affolter F, Bürgisser P et al. ; Data Center of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Lausanne, Switzerland. Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence and chronic infections in patients with HIV, Switzerland. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17:1074–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yu C, Engle RE, Bryan JP, Emerson SU, Purcell RH. Detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to hepatitis E virus by class capture enzyme immunoassay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003; 10:579–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jothikumar N, Cromeans TL, Robertson BH, Meng XJ, Hill VR. A broadly reactive one-step real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid and sensitive detection of hepatitis E virus. J Virol Methods 2006; 131:65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yu C, Boon D, McDonald SL et al. Pathogenesis of hepatitis E virus and hepatitis C virus in chimpanzees: similarities and differences. J Virol 2010; 84:11264–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Davern TJ, Chalasani N, Fontana RJ et al. ; Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN). Acute hepatitis E infection accounts for some cases of suspected drug-induced liver injury. Gastroenterology 2011; 141:1665–72.e1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Johne R, Plenge-Bönig A, Hess M, Ulrich RG, Reetz J, Schielke A. Detection of a novel hepatitis E-like virus in faeces of wild rats using a nested broad-spectrum RT-PCR. J Gen Virol 2010; 91:750–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nelson KE, Kmush B, Labrique AB. The epidemiology of hepatitis E virus infections in developed countries and among immunocompromised patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011; 9:1133–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
