Skip to main content
Electronic Physician logoLink to Electronic Physician
. 2018 Jan 25;10(1):6219–6222. doi: 10.19082/6219

Histological evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement following low level laser irradiation in rabbits

Mostafa Abtahi 1, Nasrollah Saghravanian 2, Maryam Poosti 3, Hooman Shafaee 2,
PMCID: PMC5853997  PMID: 29588823

Abstract

Background

Reduction of orthodontic treatment time is a major concern for orthodontists. Low level laser therapy (LLL) has been widely used in dentistry and it has been claimed that it could stimulate bone formation.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to evaluate histological effects of LLL on alveolar bone remodeling during experimental tooth movement in rabbits.

Methods

In this experimental study which was performed in the animal lab of Mashhad Dental School in 2016 twenty pre-pubertal female albino rabbits with the mean age of 8±1 weeks were randomly assigned into two groups. All the rabbits were examined by a veterinarian, and underweight or diseased rabbits were excluded from the study. Fifty gram orthodontic force was applied via 0.014 stainless steel spring on central teeth in both groups. In the first group, low level laser KLO3 (wave length: 980 nm, Power: 80mw) was irradiated three minutes from the buccal aspect of central teeth for 21 days. In the second group, rabbits were not exposed to laser irradiation and served as our control group. After this period, the distance between mesial corners of incisors was measured blindly by a caliper calibrated as 0.1mm. All rabbits in both groups were sacrificed by vital perfusion for histological evaluation to determine the number of resorption lacuna and amount of fibrous tissue. Independent sample t-test was used to analyze the data.

Results

The number of resorption lacuna, the rate of tooth movement and fibrous tissue were significantly greater in the lased group (p=0.05).

Conclusion

Low level laser irradiation could accelerate tooth movement in rabbits via increased resorptive activity in alveolar bone.

Keywords: Low level laser, Tooth movement, Rabbit, Orthodontics

1. Introduction

Long duration of orthodontic treatment has always been of concern for many patients and clinicians. Increasing the velocity of tooth movement within physiological limits could decrease the side effects, and lead to more comfort and satisfaction for patients (1). Many modalities especially medications have been used for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement (2, 3). Low level laser (LLL) therapy has been used in treating many conditions with multiple clinical effects on both soft and hard tissues in dentistry. In orthodontics, the anti-analgesic effect of low-energy laser irradiation in reduction of post-adjustment pain has been recognized (1, 4). Some authors have exclusively concentrated on LLL as a potential stimulator of bone healing (5, 6). Stimulatory effects of low-energy laser irradiation on bone regeneration in rats have been noted before (7, 8). Guzzardella et al. observed accelerated defect healing following low power laser stimulation in rat femurs after only 3 weeks (9). In the study of Ozawa et al., it was demonstrated that laser irradiation stimulates cellular proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast cells, generating an increase in number as well as in bone formation (10). In the studies of Fujita et al. and Yamaguchi et al., it was revealed that low-energy laser irradiation accelerated tooth movement and osteoclastogenesis on the pressure site (11, 12). Furthermore, in the studies of Kawasaki and Shimizu, it was reported that low-energy laser irradiation stimulated the amount of tooth movement and development of osteoclasts on the pressure side during in vivo experimental tooth movement (13). Orthodontic treatment comprises biological development in which both bone formation and bone resorption are involved. However, there is still insufficient knowledge regarding the histological changes after laser irradiation on the site of tooth movement. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare histological effects of LLL on alveolar bone remodeling during experimental tooth movement with that of a control group.

2. Material and Methods

In this experimental study, which was performed in the animal lab of Mashhad Dental School in 2016, twenty pre-pubertal female albino rabbits (based on Akin’s study (14) with the mean age of (8±1 weeks) and the mean weight of 1850 gr were randomly divided into equal groups. In both groups orthodontic force was applied using Akin (14) and Poosti (15) methods with 0.014 stainless steel wire in the vertical slot of bonded brackets. All the springs had similar diameter and height and were activated only once from one arm to insert 50gr distal force. In the first group low level laser (KLO3, Mustang, Russia, wave length: 980 nm, Power: 80 mw) was irradiated three minutes from the buccal aspect of the central teeth for 21 days. After this period, the distance between mesial corners of incisors was measured blindly by a caliper calibrated as 0.1mm. In the second group, the same method as the first group was used except that rabbits were not exposed to laser irradiation. This group served as our control group. Then all the rabbits were sacrificed by vital perfusion for histological evaluation. After fixation of maxilla in 4% formaldehyde, it was demineralized in EDTA for 60 days, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections were cut sagittally parallel to the long axis of the roots with 4 μm diameter, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to determine the number of resorption lacuna, and amount of fibrous tissue in the two groups, under light microscopy by ×100 magnification. Images were subsequently captured with a digital camera coupled to the microscope, and the operator who was blind to the study groups evaluated the specimen. Statistical analysis was performed by independent-samples t-test.

3. Results

In this study, the number of resorption lacuna in the laser group was significantly greater than in the control group (p=0.0005). Also, the amount of fibrous tissue was significantly greater in the laser group (p=0.032). Our results showed that low level laser irradiation enhanced orthodontic tooth movement (p<0.01) (Table 1). It could be seen in the H&E section that the number of resorption lacuna and fibrous tissue were greater in the laser group (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Comparison of Resorption lacuna, fibrous tissue and tooth movement (mm) in two groups

Variables Laser group (Mean±SD) Control group (Mean±SD) p-value
Resorption Lacuna 3.3±1.29 1.75±1.07 0.0005*
Fibrous tissue 80.4±13.6 67.8±10.4 0. 032*
Tooth movement (mm) 5.64±0.3 4.5±0.41 <0.001*

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Histological comparison of the lased (1) and control (2) groups. A-Dentin; B: Cementum, C: Fibrous PDL, D: Resorption lacuna, E: Bone marrow

4. Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the effects of KLO3 laser with the wave length of 980 nm and 80 mw power on tooth movement in rabbits. We found an increased number of resorption lacuna and accelerated rate of tooth movement in the lased group in comparison with control group. Similar to our study, Fujita et al. (12) demonstrated that the rate of tooth movement after one week of low level laser irradiation was significantly greater (1.5 folds) in the lased group as compared with the control group. Kawasaki et al. (13) have also found similar results after 12 days (1.3 fold greater in lased group). In our study, the amount of tooth movement was significantly greater in the LLL group after 21 days in rabbits (1.2 fold, in comparison with control group). Youseff (16) has shown greater velocity of tooth movement in human patients with less pain during canine retraction, by irradiation of Gallium Aluminum Arsenide laser. In our study, histological evaluation showed that the number of resorption lacuna was significantly greater in the laser group and similar to our results, Cruz et al. (17) found more resorption lacuna after laser irradiation. Our histological assessment results showed that in contrary to Limpanichkul (18) findings, low level laser has adequate power to pass through soft tissues and reach alveolar bone, which is in agreement with Saito (8) and Kim (19) studies. Furthermore, low level laser does not have the disadvantage of systemic absorption, and it could be considered as a non-invasive method for acceleration of tooth movement. Conversely, Seifi et al. (20) believes that following low-level laser therapy (KLO3) with 630 and 850 nm wave lengths, the amounts of orthodontic tooth movement are diminished. The members of the laser group in Seifi’s (20) study received laser for only 9 days but we exposed the animals to laser beam for 21 days. This difference could explain the contradiction between our result and Seifi’s result. The study of Coombe et al. (21) also reported no evidence of effects on human osteosarcoma cell line (SAOS-2) while the cells were irradiated for 10 days with GaAlAs continuous wave diode laser (830 nm, net output of 90 mW, energy levels of 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 J). It was determined that direct irradiation of LLL does not function as an accelerator stimulus for orthodontic tooth movement. Laser irradiation could alter blood flow in the exposed area (22), therefore it may have different effects while exposed in vital tissues rather than cell lines. However, our results showed an increase in resorption lacuna which could be explained by stimulation of osteoclastic activity in the area. These controversial findings were the main reason that our study focused on histological evaluation after laser therapy, and the methods used in this study showed that LLL therapy had a positive effect on the velocity of tooth movement in rabbits.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our findings showed that in the laser group, orthodontic tooth movement was significantly more than in the control group and also, resorption lacuna were greater in the laser group. These findings may indicate that application of LLL in orthodontic clinics may accelerate the rate of tooth movement and decrease the duration of treatment. Finally, we suggest that other types of LLL and other protocols of irradiation be used in future studies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the Vice Chancellor for Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for the financial support.

Footnotes

iThenticate screening: December 24, 2017, English editing: January 13, 2018, Quality control: January 15, 2018

This article has been reviewed / commented by four experts

Conflict of Interest:

There is no conflict of interest to be declared.

Authors’ contributions:

All authors contributed to this project and article equally. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Lim HM, Lew KK, Tay DK. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of low level laser therapy in reducing orthodontic post adjustment pain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:614–22. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abtahi M, Shafaee H, Saghravania N, Peel S, Giddon D, Sohrabi K. Effect of corticosteroids on orthodontic tooth movement in a rabbit model. J Clin Ped Dent. 2014;38(3):285–9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.n04h7105121663t6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mirhashemi AH, Akhoundi MS, Sheikhzadeh S, Momeni N, Dehpour A, Alaeddini M, et al. Effect of fluoxetine consumption on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. J Dent. 2015;12(12):882–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abtahi SM, Mousavi SA, Shafaee H, Tanbakuchi B. Effect of low-level laser therapy on dental pain induced by separator force in orthodontic treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10(5):647–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tang XM, Chai BP. Effects of CO2 laser irradiation on experimental fracture healing: a transmission electron microscopic study. Lasers Surg Med. 1986;6:346–52. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900060309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Trelles MA, Mayayo E. Bone fracture consolidates faster with low-power laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1987;7:36–45. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900070107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barushka O, Yaakobi T, Oron U. Effect of low-energy laser (He.Ne) irradiation on the process of bone repair in the rat tibia. Bone. 1995;16:47–55. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(94)00006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saito S, Shimizu N. Stimulatory effects of low-power laser irradiation on bone regeneration in midpalatal suture during expansion in the rat. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:525–32. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70152-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guzzardella GA, Fini M, Torricelli P, Giavaresi G, Giardino R. Laser stimulation on bone defect healing: An In Vitro Study. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17:216–20. doi: 10.1007/s101030200031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ozawa Y, Shimizu N, Kariya G, Abiko Y. Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates bone nodule formation at early stages of cell culture in rat calvarial cells. Bone. 1998;22:347–54. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00294-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamaguchi M, Fujita S, Yoshida T, Oikawa K, Yamamoto H, Kasai K. Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates the tooth movement velocity via expression of M-CSF and c-fms. Orthod Waves. 2007;66:139–48. doi: 10.1016/j.odw.2007.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fujita S, Yamaguchi Y, Utsunomiya T, Yamamoto H, Kasai K. Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates tooth movement velocity via expression of RANK and RANKL. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:143–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kawasaki K, Shimizu N. Effects of low-energy laser irradiation on bone remodeling during experimental tooth movement in rats. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26:282–91. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(2000)26:3&#x0003c;282::AID-LSM6&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Akin E, Gurton AU, Olmez H. Effects of nitric oxide on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(5):608–14. doi: 10.1016/S0889540604004494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Poosti M, Basafa M, Eslami N. Progesterone effects on experimental tooth movement in rabbits. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2009;37:483–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Youssef M, Ashkar S, Hamade E, Gutknech N, Lomper TF, Mir M. The effect of low level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2007;23:27–33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0449-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cruz DR, Kohata EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU. Effects of low intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35:117–20. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Limpanichkul W, Godfrey K, Srisuk N, Rattanayatikul C. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006;9:38–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00338.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim YD, Song WW, Kim SS, Kim GC, Hwang DS, Shin SH, et al. Expression of receptor of nuclear factor-KB ligand, receptor activator of nuclear factor-KB, and osteoprotegerin, following low-level laser treatment on deproteinized bovine bone graft in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:577–84. doi: 10.1007/s10103-008-0614-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Seifi M, Shafeei HA, Daneshdoost S, Mir M. Effects of two types of low level laser wave lengths (850 and 630 nm) on the orthodontic tooth movements in rabbits. Lasers MedSci. 2007;22:261–4. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0447-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coombe AR, Ho CT, Darendeliler MA, Hunter N, Philips JR, Chapple CC, et al. The effect of low level laser on osteoblastic cells. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;1:3–14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.040102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Song CW, Chelstrom LM, Levitt SH, Haumschild DJ. Effects of temperature on blood circulation measured with the laser Doppler method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:1041–7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90153-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Electronic Physician are provided here courtesy of The Electronic Physician

RESOURCES