Skip to main content
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research logoLink to Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
. 2017 Oct 19;8(1):48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.10.003

Angiogenic and osteogenic potentials of dental stem cells in bone tissue engineering

Muhammad Fuad Hilmi Yusof a, Wafa’ Zahari a, Siti Nurnasihah Md Hashim a, Zul Faizuddin Osman a, Hamshawagini Chandra a, Thirumulu Ponnuraj Kannan a,b, Khairul Bariah Ahmad Amin Noordin a, Ahmad Azlina a,b,
PMCID: PMC5854554  PMID: 29556464

Abstract

Manipulation of dental stem cells (DSCs) using current technologies in tissue engineering unveil promising prospect in regenerative medicine. DSCs have shown to possess angiogenic and osteogenic potential in both in vivo and in vitro. Neural crest derived DSCs can successfully be isolated from various dental tissues, exploiting their intrinsic great differentiation potential. In this article, researcher team intent to review the characteristics of DSCs, with focus on their angiogenic and osteogenic differentiation lineage. Clinical data on DSCs are still lacking to prove their restorative abilities despite extensive contemporary literature, warranting research to further validate their application for bone tissue engineering.

Keywords: Dental Stem Cells, Angiogenic, Osteogenic, Tissue Engineering, Neural Crest, Stem Cells

1. Introduction

The end game of tissue engineering is to facilitate the healing of the damaged tissue and restore the function sustainably.1 Deploying dental stem cells (DSCs) to clinically validate their potential as biological raw material for tissue engineering is widely studied.2 The synergy between the stem cells (SCs), one of the troika in 3D construct for tissue engineering (TE) with two other machineries (the growth factor and scaffold) is required to commence and deliver its regenerative function.3 Once transplantation is executed, the DSCs seeded in the 3D construct grow and differentiate into the preferred fate.4 The integration with the host system, especially the vascular system will ensure the survival and sustenance of the engineered tissue and the reparation success.5 Fundamentally, a matured organism originates from single pluripotent embryonic SC.6 After reaching adult stage, there are some mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) populating in the terminally differentiated tissue, mainly in the perivascular niche for homeostasis and tissue injury healing.7 The objectives of this review are to deliberate the type of dental derived SCs and their properties. The focus will be emphasised on angiogenic and osteogenic features. Lastly, we outline the gaps in translating the findings in TE for therapeutic applications.

2. Dental stem cell characteristics

About more than 10 years ago, Gronthos and his team reported on their discovery of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) that marked the extensive pursuit for other dental derived stem cells sources.7 DSCs are clonogenic and self-renewal postnatal MSCs derived from dental tissues that are craniofacially located. Scientists have documented several types of SCs that have been successfully isolated and expanded in vitro, namely, DPSCs,7 stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED),8 periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs),9 SCs isolated from dental follicle precursor cells (DFPCs)10, stem cells isolated from apical papilla (SCAP)11 and stem cells from human gingiva.12 Though embryonic SC is of paramount importance with regard to all potency, however, DSCs have the edge over the rest since it involves non-invasive collection procedure and is ethically less hassle.13 DSCs originate from the embryonic source of neural crest ectomesenchyme, expressing typical MSC surface markers (Fig. 1). Until recently, the mainstream thesis believed that perivascular cells contribute to dental MSCs, however, peripheral nerve-associated glia dedifferentiated into a population of MSCs and involve in the development, self-renewal and repair of a tooth. The molecular profiling of DSCs exhibits the presence of angiogenic and osteogenic markers, revealing their plasticity which suggests their huge potential in tissue engineering.14

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The angiogenic and osteogenic potential of dental stem cells for bone tissue engineering.

At the cellular level, Nestin is a neural stem cell (NSC) marker expressed by DSCs and also an intermediate filament constituting the cytoskeleton.15 The regulation of odontoblastic differentiation, tooth development and dentin reparation are associated with the nestin expression.16 The DSCs also express notch, another type of NSC marker. Notch signaling was shown to participate in maintaining the stemness and proliferative state of the cells.17 Notch signaling factors (receptors and ligands) regulate dental germ development as well as for impacted mature teeth restoration.18 The availability of these markers in DSCs reveals the lineage of the progenitor cells and explains their potential of specializing into neuronal cells.19 Thus, DSCs can be a good SC source to be differentiated to neural cells, which can be utilised to treat neurodegenerative diseases or nerve traumatic injuries.20 Moreover, the high proliferation rate of DSCs is an advantage in comparison to the other sources of SCs in terms of propagation efficiency.7

DSCs display angiogenic property due to the expression of endothelial differentiation markers. Angiopoietin 1 (Ang-1), cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) and Ephrin B2 are among the documented markers that occur in the DSCs. Physiologically, Ang-1 controls the proliferation and survival of endothelial cells as well as vessel maturation.21 Cox-2 activates the signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and angiogenesis,22 while Ephrin B2 controls the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor that promotes vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.23 Any irregularity to this feature may cause pathological conditions as a faulty angiogenic regulation is also associated with arthritis, psoriasis and blinding retinopathy.22, 24, 25

Apart from neural and angiogenic properties, osteogenic markers also present in DSCs include alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagen type I (Col I), osteocalcin (OCL), and osteopontin (OPN).26, 27 The differentiation of DSCs into odontoblasts is regulated by ALP. ALP is also a key marker of pluripotent embryonic SC identification as well as in MSCs.27 At the tissue level, Col I is the major structural protein found in bone, skin,28 tendons and ligaments.29, 30 The defect in Col I gene may result in various disorders such as Caffey disease and osteogenesis imperfecta.30, 31

The presence of three different markers, neural, angiogenic and osteogenic in the DSCs show its differentiation potentials. These entice interest from the pre and clinical communities to exploit their capability to produce engineered tissue such as blood vessel or bone.32, 33 DSCs are known as MSCs, and thus, they are capable of giving rise to chondrogenic, osteogenic and adipogenic lineage of cells.34 In addition, DSCs also show neurogenic and angiogenic potentials. Therefore, these multipotent cells attract fundamental and clinical communities to exploit their capability to produce engineered tissues such as blood vessel or bone.32, 33

3. Angiogenic potential of dental stem cells

The formation of new blood vessels or angiogenesis is the focal point in tissue engineering that happens to be a great challenge.35 The failure to do so will interrupt the supply of basic needs of newly transplanted tissue and may compromise the survival and success rate.36 Physiologically, angiogenesis allows the process of growth and development and wound healing to take place.37, 38 However, angiogenesis is also associated with serious pathological conditions.24 Defining angiogenesis regulation is the major milestone as this will be of great benefit in therapeutic applications in patients in inducing neovascularization. Selection of DSCs as one of the components of engineered construct provides an advantage due to its angiogenic behavior.39 DSCs displayed their pro-angiogenic effects via two manners; firstly, paracrine effects by secreting angiogenic factors and secondly, by differentiating into endothelial cells and directly integrating with host.40, 41

DPSCs induced angiogenesis by releasing angiogenic factor in the DPSCs conditioned medium (CM).39 Profiling of the media revealed the presence of VEGF and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), classic components that promote angiogenesis.42 DPSCs were able to significantly promote the formation of blood vessels in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay.42 Another study investigated the paracrine effects of DPSCs in murine model, which found that wound healing is enhanced by the injected DPSCs.43

Besides DPSCs, SHED have been previously reported to differentiate into vascular endothelial cells both in vivo and in vitro.32 SHED were seeded in tooth slice as scaffold and implanted subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice.44 Consequently, they noted that SHED differentiated into new functional blood vessels and attached to the host circulatory system.44 The presence of cellular elements in the newly formed vessels suggested that these capillaries anastomised with the host vasculature. The scaffold utilized was also believed to induce endothelial differentiation of SHED due to the angiogenic factors residing in the stromal cells45 or dentin matrix,46 while, in the in vitro study, SHED turned into endothelial cells32 after VEGF administration, an effective growth factor in inducing angiogenesis.47 The endothelial differentiation markers, namely, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and CD31 were positively expressed.32 Treatment with VEGF was also responsible for the higher number of capillaries sprouting without having an effect on the proliferation rate of SHED.48 Primary DPSCs also displayed endothelial differentiation triggered by VEGF.32 The differentiated cells expressed the common endothelial markers, VEGFR2 and CD31.32 Based on these evidences, it can be concluded that DSCs are able to differentiate into endothelial cells.

The other type of SCs previously described on their involvement in angiogenesis, both via co-culture and differentiation pathways which include embryonic SCs (ESCs),49, 50 adipose derived SCs51, 52 and cardiac SCs53 and endothelial progenitor cells.54, 55 However, among the SCs, the ESCs possess a major concern with regards to its tumorigenic potential.56, 57 Hence, this might incur additional studies to ensure that the end products are fit and safe for consumers.

These studies highlighted the angiogenic potential of DSCs that can be useful for in applications. Further development and trials need to be carried out to assess the safety and efficacy of DSCs and translate their potential to the patients.

4. Osteogenic potential of dental stem cells

The exploration of DSCs osteogenic potential has been extensively investigated in the last decade since the discovery of DSCs.7 Physiologically, the formation of bone involves MSC accumulation for mesenchymal condensations.58 This process partially resembles the formation of tooth except that there is no epithelial invagination.59 The nearby cells naturally restore the impacted bone tissue when there is minor fracture including chondroblasts, osteoblasts, endotheliocytes, and fibroblasts.60 However, when the injuries are beyond repair by the local cells (such as large bone defects created by trauma, infection, tumor resection, and skeletal abnormalities), stem cell therapy can be an option (such as bone marrow SCs) for bone regeneration.60

DSCs may be one of the possible SC sources for bone regeneration as they are able to differentiate into osteocytes and osteoblasts under special conditions in vitro.23, 27, 61, 62, 63 DFPCs were shown to have osteogenic differentiation potential, although it was cultured in the absence of dexamethasone, a pro-osteogenic supplement.62 Osteo/odontogenic differentiation by SCAPs was observed and addition of KH2PO4 promoted proliferation and differentiation of SCAP.63 Interestingly, the mineralized tissue formation ability by DPSCs can be enhanced by genetic modification study as well as during in vitro study.33

Various in vivo studies that employed DSCs from different sources such as human, murine, rabbit, canine and minipig showed that DSCs also differentiated into bone-like structure.33, 64, 65, 66, 67 A defected mandibular was treated with cryopreserved SHED, and it was found that osteogenesis took place without immune response from the host.68 Another study was done in periodontal fenestration defected rats and after treatment with allogeneic PDLSCs, periodontal defects were repaired.69

Recently, a clinical trial verified the efficiency of autologous PDLSCs to regenerate periodontal tissue in periodontitis patients with deep intraosseous defects (>5 mm) and the safety of PDLSCs in clinical periodontal regenerative medicine.2

In comparison with bone marrow SCs, DSCs were more competitive as they have immunosuppressive properties, are highly proliferative and can endure cryopreservation without harming the SCs.70, 71 Despite these positive features reported, Asatrian et al. suggested that the limited quantity of pulp in a tooth may hinder DSCs’ potential as an alternative source for therapeutic application.72

All of the studies discussed earlier provide preclinical and clinical evidences of DSCs’ ability to differentiate into bone tissue. This feature can be linked to the embryonic origin of DSCs which is from the neural crest.73, 74 Hence, it can be concluded that DSCs have the osteogenic differentiation ability.

5. Angiogenesis and osteogenesis: bone tissue engineering duo

More than 200 years ago, the intimate relationship between angiogenesis and osteogenesis had been acknowledged.75, 76 Angiogenesis along with efficient supply of blood are prerequisites to support and sustain the bone development and maintenance.77 The blood vessels also serve as communication network for the skeletal and neighboring tissue.78 In the field of reconstructive orthopaedic, autograft is the first option should orthopedic surgeons are required to perform bone graft.79 Autogenous bone graft is the most preferable, as it is osteoconductive, osteoinductive and osteogenic.80 Autogenous cancellous bone extracted from the iliac crest is considered a popular option due to the fact that it fulfills the three features.81 Nonetheless, there are few complications associated with the invasive autograph extraction procedure which include wound infection, persistent pain, swelling and altered sensation.82

Previously, some approaches employed in bone tissue engineering co-transplanted osteoprogenitor cells with either hematopoietic or endothelial cells aiming to establish a supportive blood supply to the transplanted cells.83, 84, 85, 86 Besides using co-culturing technique, there is another strategy to promote vascularization for the engineered tissue using VEGF87 and prefabricated tissue engineered construct.88 However, both methodologies come with few hiccups that require more validation in the in vivo models and major clinical setback that patients will need to go surgery at least twice, double the expenditures and complexity of which could overshadow its future clinical applications.

With regard to these factors and gaps mentioned, a fresh approach for bone regeneration require a new strategy by employing single cell source of MSCs that are not only osteogenic but also have the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells and integrate with host vasculature network to support cell viability and to fully restore the tissue function.

Bone marrow SCs were harvested and expanded into bone repair cells (BRCs) which was proposed as a new single source having osteogenic and angiogenic potentials.89 Though the study noted that the BRCs phenotypically showed vascular-like profile and molecularly expressed markers for both endothelial and pericytic cells, this study was unable to determine the source of cells that contributed to tissue regeneration.89 Another SC source, the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue containing progenitor cells, has the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells and various musculoskeletal lineages.90 A study showed that SVF was able to stimulate neovasculogenesis in the mouse ischemic hindlimb.91 Nevertheless, the mechanism underlies the vascularisation of this model yet to be elucidated and the more challenging pre-clinical trials design should be tested.

Alternatively, DSCs have the potential to differentiate into osteogenic and endothelial cell types that develop into mature bone (Table 1). Human DPSCs,92 PDLSCs93 and SHED94 have demonstrated the ability to form engineered bone grafts, and also differentiate into vascular cells.95, 96 To date, investigation on thorough potential of DSCs as a single SC source for bone tissue engineering is lacking; from the upstream of the fundamental research, the pre-clinical and clinical trials that have been approved by the regulatory bodies and to formulate the most efficient biomanufacturing of clinical grade SC.

Table 1.

The differentiation potential of dental derived stem cells.

Stem Cells Source Scaffold Host Gene Markers Result Ref.
Angiogenic differentiation SCAP Human synthetic scaffolds consisting of poly-D,L-lactide/glycolide Mouse DSP, BSP, ALP, CD105 Regeneration of pulp-like tissue with well-established vascularity 104
DPSC Human N/A Mouse CD31 Promoting tubular network formation of endothelial cells and the proliferation of dermal fibroblasts 105
SHED Human human tooth slice Mouse EGFR2 and CD31 Differentiation of primary SHED into endothelial cells 32



Osteogenic differentiation SHED Human Tooth slice Mouse VEGFR2, CD31, and VE-Cadherin Differentiated into functional odontoblasts and vascular endothelial cells 48
DPSC Human N/A ALP, Coll I, OSC, OPN, IGFBP-5, JunB, and NURR1 osteoblastic differentiation process, IGFBP-5, JunB, and NURR1 gene expression is significantly increased 27
Gingiva Human Biografts containing hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate Mouse Cbfa 1, ALP, osterix, collagen type I, OSC Tissue mineralisation 106
SHED Human Hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate Mouse BSP, OSC calvarial defects were reversible with substantial bone formation 94

DSP = dentin sialoprotein, BSP = bone sialoprotein, ALP = alkaline phosphatase. CBF α 1 (RUNX2) = core binding factor subunit alpha 1, OSC = osteocalcinCollagen type I = coll I, Osteopontin = OPN, IGFBP-5 = insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5, NURR1 = nuclear receptor related 1 protein, Ref. = reference.

6. Dental stem cells in tissue engineering: angiogenesis and osteogenesis

The prospective of DSCs in tissue engineering is vast not only for dentistry field but also for various types of regenerative medicine that include neural and bone.8, 27, 97, 98, 99, 100 The angiogenic and osteogenic potentials of DSCs entice the research and clinical community to get more understanding on this subject matter for future clinical practice.27, 35, 101 However, these experimental findings are not conclusive and need to be validated in certified facilities abiding international standards. An integrated roadmap is needed to develop a sustainable tissue engineering value chain. An effort has been done by Hiroshima University setting up a commercial teeth bank in 2004 and later followed by a lot of bio-based companies globally to offer clinical grade cell storage service.102 The double-blind randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to clinically prove the ability of DSCs for therapeutic functions.102

Ideally, for stem cell based therapy for therapeutic approval, according to Ministry of Health, Malaysia, SCs must be reproducible, proliferate extensively and generate sufficient quantities of tissue. Besides that, they should differentiate into the desired cell types and survive in the recipient after transplantation and integrate into the surrounding tissue afterwards. Then, they should be functional throughout the recipient’s life without harming the recipient in any way.103

7. Conclusion

The multipotent DSCs which can be isolated from various sites of dental tissues demonstrated promising prospects for future therapeutic applications. The angiogenic and osteogenic potential possessed by DSCs can be further investigated and validated as a common stem cell source for bone tissue engineering application. Addressing the gaps highlighted previously may provide concrete evidences that can offer better treatment strategy and benefit the patients as a whole. Innovation for a better healthcare solution will be an exciting endeavour for DSCs and bone tissue engineering research community.

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This review was supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University Grant (1001/PPSG/813075) and Scholarship of MyPhD by Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.

References

  • 1.Murray P.E., Garcia-Godoy F., Hargreaves K.M. Regenerative endodontics: a review of current status and a call for action. J Endod. 2007;33:377–390. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen F.M., Gao L.N., Tian B.M. Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects using autologous periodontal ligament stem cells: a randomized clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7:33. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0288-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Niknejad H., Peirovi H., Jorjani M., Ahmadiani A., Ghanavi J., Seifalian A.M. Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater. 2008;15:88–99. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v015a07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gandia C., Arminan A., Garcia-Verdugo J.M. Human dental pulp stem cells improve left ventricular function, induce angiogenesis, and reduce infarct size in rats with acute myocardial infarction. Stem Cells. 2008;26:638–645. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang W.J., Wray L.S., Rnjak-Kovacina J. Vascularization of hollow channel-modified porous silk scaffolds with endothelial cells for tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2015;56:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Odorico J.S., Kaufman D.S., Thomson J.A. Multilineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells. 2001;19:193–204. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-3-193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gronthos S., Mankani M., Brahim J., Robey P.G., Shi S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:13625–13630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.240309797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miura M., Gronthos S., Zhao M. SHED – stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. J Dent Res. 2003;82:B305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0937635100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seo B.M., Miura M., Gronthos S. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet. 2004;364:149–155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16627-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morsczeck C., Gotz W., Schierholz J. Isolation of precursor cells (PCs) from human dental follicle of wisdom teeth. Matrix Biol. 2005;24:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2004.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sonoyama W., Liu Y., Yamaza T. Characterization of the apical papilla and its residing stem cells from human immature permanent teeth: a pilot study. J Endod. 2008;34:166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang Q.Z., Shi S.H., Liu Y. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from human gingiva are capable of immunomodulatory functions and ameliorate inflammation-related tissue destruction in experimental colitis. J Immunol. 2009;183:7787–7798. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brar G.S., Toor R.S. Dental stem cells: dentinogenic, osteogenic, and neurogenic differentiation and its clinical cell based therapies. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:393–397. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.102239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang G.T.J., Gronthos S., Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res. 2009;88:792–806. doi: 10.1177/0022034509340867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gronthos S., Brahim J., Li W. Stem cell properties of human dental pulp stem cells. J Dent Res. 2002;81:531–535. doi: 10.1177/154405910208100806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fujita S., Hideshima K., Ikeda T. Nestin expression in odontoblasts and odontogenic ectomesenchymal tissue of odontogenic tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:240–245. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.025403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Artavanis-Tsakonas S., Muskavitch M.A. Notch: the past, the present, and the future. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010;92:1–29. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)92001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cai X., Gong P., Huang Y., Lin Y. Notch signalling pathway in tooth development and adult dental cells. Cell Prolif. 2011;44:495–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00780.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nosrat I.V., Widenfalk J., Olson L., Nosrat C.A. Dental pulp cells produce neurotrophic factors, interact with trigeminal neurons in vitro, and rescue motoneurons after spinal cord injury. Dev Biol. 2001;238:120–132. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ibarretxe G., Crende O., Aurrekoetxea M., Garcia-Murga V., Etxaniz J., Unda F. Neural crest stem cells from dental tissues: a new hope for dental and neural regeneration. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:103503. doi: 10.1155/2012/103503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Suri C., Jones P.F., Patan S. Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell. 1996;87:1171–1180. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81813-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Muraki C., Ohga N., Hida Y. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition causes antiangiogenic effects on tumor endothelial and vascular progenitor cells. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:59–70. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang Y.D., Nakayama M., Pitulescu M.E. Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2010;465:483–486. doi: 10.1038/nature09002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carmeliet P., Jain R.K. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249–257. doi: 10.1038/35025220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sawamiphak S., Seidel S., Essmann C.L. Ephrin-B2 regulates VEGFR2 function in developmental and tumour angiogenesis. Nature. 2010;465:487–491. doi: 10.1038/nature08995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O'connor M.D., Kardel M.D., Iosfina I. Alkaline phosphatase-positive colony formation is a sensitive, specific, and quantitative indicator of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1109–1116. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mori G., Brunetti G., Oranger A. Dental pulp stem cells: osteogenic differentiation and gene expression. Skelet Biol Med I. 2011;1237:47–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gistelinck C., Gioia R., Gagliardi A. Zebrafish collagen type I: molecular and biochemical characterization of the major structural protein in bone and skin. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21540. doi: 10.1038/srep21540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amiel D., Frank C., Harwood F., Fronek J., Akeson W. Tendons and ligaments: a morphological and biochemical comparison. J Orthop Res. 1983;1:257–265. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100010305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nistala H., Makitie O., Juppner H. Caffey disease: new perspectives on old questions. Bone. 2014;60:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.12.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Forlino A., Cabral W.A., Barnes A.M., Marini J.C. New perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7:540–557. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bento L.W., Zhang Z., Imai A. Endothelial differentiation of SHED requires MEK1/ERK signaling. J Dent Res. 2013;92:51–57. doi: 10.1177/0022034512466263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang X., van der Kraan P.M., Bian Z., Fan M., Walboomers X.F., Jansen J.A. Mineralized tissue formation by BMP2-transfected pulp stem cells. J Dent Res. 2009;88:1020–1025. doi: 10.1177/0022034509346258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: the International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hilkens P., Fanton Y., Martens W. Pro-angiogenic impact of dental stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res. 2014;12:778–790. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Laschke M.W., Harder Y., Amon M. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2093–2104. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med. 2003;9:653–660. doi: 10.1038/nm0603-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tonnesen M.G., Feng X., Clark R.A. Angiogenesis in wound healing. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc. 2000;5:40–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1087-0024.2000.00014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hilkens P., Fanton Y., Martens W. Pro-angiogenic impact of dental stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res. 2014;12:778–790. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tran-Hung L., Mathieu S., About I. Role of human pulp fibroblasts in angiogenesis. J Dent Res. 2006;85:819–823. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karaoz E., Dogan B.N., Aksoy A. Isolation and in vitro characterisation of dental pulp stem cells from natal teeth. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010;133:95–112. doi: 10.1007/s00418-009-0646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bronckaers A., Hilkens P., Fanton Y. Angiogenic properties of human dental pulp stem cells. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071104. e71104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nishino Y., Yamada Y., Ebisawa K. Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) enhance wound healing and the possibility of novel cell therapy. Cytotherapy. 2011;13:598–605. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.542462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sakai V.T., Cordeiro M.M., Dong Z., Zhang Z., Zeitlin B.D., Nor J.E. Tooth slice/scaffold model of dental pulp tissue engineering. Adv Dent Res. 2011;23:325–332. doi: 10.1177/0022034511405325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tran-Hung L., Laurent P., Camps J., About I. Quantification of angiogenic growth factors released by human dental cells after injury. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Roberts-Clark D., Smith A. Angiogenic growth factors in human dentine matrix. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45:1013–1016. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00075-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoeben A., Landuyt B., Highley M.S., Wildiers H., Van Oosterom A.T., De Bruijn E.A. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56:549–580. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.4.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sakai V., Zhang Z., Dong Z. SHED differentiate into functional odontoblasts and endothelium. J Dent Res. 2010;89:791–796. doi: 10.1177/0022034510368647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sriram G., Tan J.Y., Islam I., Rufaihah A.J., Cao T. Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to arterial and venous endothelial cells under feeder- and serum-free conditions. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:261. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0260-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Levenberg S., Zoldan J., Basevitch Y., Langer R. Endothelial potential of human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2007;110:806–814. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-019190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rehman J., Traktuev D., Li J. Secretion of angiogenic and antiapoptotic factors by human adipose stromal cells. Circulation. 2004;109:1292–1298. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121425.42966.F1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Planat-Benard V., Silvestre J.S., Cousin B. Plasticity of human adipose lineage cells toward endothelial cells – physiological and therapeutic perspectives. Circulation. 2004;109:656–663. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000114522.38265.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Beltrami A.P., Barlucchi L., Torella D. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763–776. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00687-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kalka C., Masuda H., Takahashi T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3422–3427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070046397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rehman J., Li J.L., Orschell C.M., March K.L. Peripheral blood endothelial progenitor cells are derived from monocyte/macrophages and secrete angiogenic growth factors. Circulation. 2003;107:1164–1169. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000058702.69484.a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lee A.S., Tang C., Rao M.S., Weissman I.L., Wu J.C. Tumorigenicity as a clinical hurdle for pluripotent stem cell therapies. Nat Med. 2013;19:998–1004. doi: 10.1038/nm.3267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Damdimopoulou P., Rodin S., Stenfelt S., Antonsson L., Tryggvason K., Hovatta O. Human embryonic stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;31:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hall B.K., Miyake T. All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. Bioessays. 2000;22:138–147. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200002)22:2<138::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Khurana J.S. Humana Press; 2017. Bone pathology. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dimitriou R., Jones E., McGonagle D., Giannoudis P.V. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011;9:66. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Park B.W., Hah Y.S., Choi M.J. In vitro osteogenic differentiation of cultured human dental papilla-derived cells. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takahashi K., Ogura N., Aonuma H. Bone morphogenetic protein 6 stimulates mineralization in human dental follicle cells without dexamethasone. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58:690–698. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang L., Yan M., Wang Y. Proliferation and osteo/odontoblastic differentiation of stem cells from dental apical papilla in mineralization-inducing medium containing additional KH2PO4. Cell Prolif. 2013;46:214–222. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ling L.E., Feng L., Liu H.C. The effect of calcium phosphate composite scaffolds on the osteogenic differentiation of rabbit dental pulp stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103:1732–1745. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yu B.-H., Zhou Q., Wang Z.-L. Comparison of tissue-engineered bone from different stem cell sources for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a study in a canine model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1084–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ding G., Liu Y., Wang W. Allogeneic periodontal ligament stem cell therapy for periodontitis in swine. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1829–1838. doi: 10.1002/stem.512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Behnia A., Haghighat A., Talebi A., Nourbakhsh N., Heidari F. Transplantation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth for bone regeneration in the dog mandibular defect. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6:505–510. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i4.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Han J., Menicanin D., Marino V. Assessment of the regenerative potential of allogeneic periodontal ligament stem cells in a rodent periodontal defect model. J Periodont Res. 2014;49:333–345. doi: 10.1111/jre.12111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.d’Aquino R., De Rosa A., Lanza V. Human mandible bone defect repair by the grafting of dental pulp stem/progenitor cells and collagen sponge biocomplexes. Eur Cell Mater. 2009;18:75–83. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v018a07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ponnaiyan D. Do dental stem cells depict distinct characteristics?—establishing their phenotypic fingerprint. Dent Res J. 2014;11:163–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rodrigues R., Viana B., Vieira I. Dental stem cells characterization and bone regenerative potential in oral medicine. Int J Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;2:009. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Asatrian G., Pham D., Hardy W.R., James A.W., Peault B. Stem cell technology for bone regeneration: current status and potential applications. Stem Cells Cloning. 2015;8:39–48. doi: 10.2147/SCCAA.S48423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Miletich I., Sharpe P.T. Neural crest contribution to mammalian tooth formation. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2004;72:200–212. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kaukua N., Shahidi M.K., Konstantinidou C. Glial origin of mesenchymal stem cells in a tooth model system. Nature. 2014;513:551–554. doi: 10.1038/nature13536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Haller A. Opera Minora; 1763. Experimentorum de ossiem formation. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hunter J. 1794. Treatise on the blood, inflammation and gunshot wounds. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liu J., Kerns D.G. Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review. Open Dent J. 2014;8:56–65. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kanczler J.M., Oreffo R.O. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone. Eur Cell Mater. 2008;15:100–114. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v015a08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zwingenberger S., Nich C., Valladares R.D., Yao Z., Stiehler M., Goodman S.B. Recommendations and considerations for the use of biologics in orthopedic surgery. BioDrugs. 2012;26:245–256. doi: 10.2165/11631680-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cornell C.N. Osteobiologics. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 2004;62:13–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gazdag A.R., Lane J.M., Glaser D., Forster R.A. Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:1–8. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199501000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Swan M.C., Goodacre T.E.E. Morbidity at the iliac crest donor site following bone grafting of the cleft alveolus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44:129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dariima T., Jin G.Z., Lee E.J., Wall I.B., Kim H.W. Cooperation between osteoblastic cells and endothelial cells enhances their phenotypic responses and improves osteoblast function. Biotechnol Lett. 2013;35:1135–1143. doi: 10.1007/s10529-013-1170-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kim S.S., Park M.S., Cho S.W. Enhanced bone formation by marrow-derived endothelial and osteogenic cell transplantation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:246–253. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Johari B., Ahmadzadehzarajabad M., Azami M. Repair of rat critical size calvarial defect using osteoblast-like and umbilical vein endothelial cells seeded in gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2016;104:1770–1778. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Koob S., Torio-Padron N., Stark G.B., Hannig C., Stankovic Z., Finkenzeller G. Bone formation and neovascularization mediated by mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells in critical-sized calvarial defects. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:311–321. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Misteli H., Wolff T., Füglistaler P. High-throughput flow cytometry purification of transduced progenitors expressing defined levels of vascular endothelial growth factor induces controlled angiogenesis in vivo. Stem Cells. 2010;28:611–619. doi: 10.1002/stem.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Scheufler O., Schaefer D.J., Jaquiery C. Spatial and temporal patterns of bone formation in ectopically pre-fabricated, autologous cell-based engineered bone flaps in rabbits. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1238–1249. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00137.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kaigler D., Pagni G., Park C.H., Tarle S.A., Bartel R.L., Giannobile W.V. Angiogenic and osteogenic potential of bone repair cells for craniofacial regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:2809–2820. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Scherberich A., Galli R., Jaquiery C., Farhadi J., Martin I. Three-dimensional perfusion culture of human adipose tissue-derived endothelial and osteoblastic progenitors generates osteogenic constructs with intrinsic vascularization capacity. Stem Cells. 2007;25:1823–1829. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Koh Y.J., Koh B.I., Kim H. Stromal vascular fraction from adipose tissue forms profound vascular network through the dynamic reassembly of blood endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1141–1150. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.218206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Laino G., Carinci F., Graziano A. In vitro bone production using stem cells derived from human dental pulp. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:511–515. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200605000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wang Z., Feng Z., Wu G., Bai S., Dong Y., Zhao Y. In vitro studies on human periodontal ligament stem cell sheets enhanced by enamel matrix derivative. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;141:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Seo B., Sonoyama W., Yamaza T. SHED repair critical-size calvarial defects in mice. Oral Dis. 2008;14:428–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01396.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Cordeiro M.M., Dong Z., Kaneko T. Dental pulp tissue engineering with stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth. J Endod. 2008;34:962–969. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.d'Aquino R., Graziano A., Sampaolesi M. Human postnatal dental pulp cells co-differentiate into osteoblasts and endotheliocytes: a pivotal synergy leading to adult bone tissue formation. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1162–1171. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Huang G.T.J., Sonoyama W., Liu Y., Liu H., Wang S.L., Shi S.T. The hidden treasure in apical papilla: the potential role in pulp/dentin regeneration and bioroot engineering. J Endod. 2008;34:645–651. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yang K.L., Chen M.F., Liao C.H., Pang C.Y., Lin P.Y. A simple and efficient method for generating Nurr1-positive neuronal stem cells from human wisdom teeth (tNSC) and the potential of tNSC for stroke therapy. Cytotherapy. 2009;11:606–617. doi: 10.1080/14653240902806994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yamagata M., Yamamoto A., Kako E. Human dental pulp-derived stem cells protect against hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal mice. Stroke. 2013;44:551–554. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.676759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Chadipiralla K., Yochim J.M., Bahuleyan B. Osteogenic differentiation of stem cells derived from human periodontal ligaments and pulp of human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Cell Tissue Res. 2010;340:323–333. doi: 10.1007/s00441-010-0953-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Parikh N., Mansata G.D.N.P.A. Dental stem cells and their applications in regenerative medicine—a review. J Res Adv Dent. 2013;3:42–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Xiao L., Nasu M. From regenerative dentistry to regenerative medicine: progress, challenges, and potential applications of oral stem cells. Stem Cells Cloning. 2014;7:89–99. doi: 10.2147/SCCAA.S51009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Malaysia MoH . 2009. The guidelines for stem cell research and therapy. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Huang G.T.J., Yamaza T., Shea L.D. Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an in vivo model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:605–615. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yang H., Shin S., Ahn J., Choi Y., Kim K.H., Chung C.J. Local injection of pulp cells enhances wound healing during the initial proliferative phase through the stimulation of host angiogenesis. J Endod. 2013;39:788–794. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bansal R., Patil S., Chaubey K.K., Thakur R.K., Goyel P. Clinical evaluation of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate composite graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defect: a clinico-radiographic study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18:610–617. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.142455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES