Skip to main content
The Ochsner Journal logoLink to The Ochsner Journal
letter
. 2018 Spring;18(1):9–11.

Letter to the Editor: Bicuspid Aortic Valve–Family Screening and Indications for Intervention

Motaz Baibars 1, Fahed Darmoch 2, Amjad Kabach 3, Zaher Fanari 4, M Chadi Alraies 5
PMCID: PMC5855432  PMID: 29559860

TO THE EDITOR

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common adult congenital heart disease, with a prevalence as high as 2%.1 Almost 50% of aortic valve stenosis is attributable to BAV.1-3 Instead of the typical 3 leaflets in the normal heart, BAV is characterized by 2 unequal-sized leaflets that create flow disturbance. These changes in valve structure lead to flow turbulence that leads to aortic valve stenosis, regurgitation, or root dilatation.2 Systematic screening is required for at-risk populations because early recognition drives appropriate and timely intervention.

BAV morphology has different variants. The morphology determines the natural history, clinical presentation, and long-term prognosis. The most common variant of BAV is fusion of the right and left aortic valve leaflets. This variant constitutes almost 70% of all BAV cases and is associated with aortic coarctation. The second most common variant is fusion of the right and noncoronary leaflets. This variant is seen in 28% of BAV cases and is associated with higher rates of aortic valve complications (stenosis and regurgitation) and less association with aortic root dilatation.4 The third variant of BAV is fusion of the left and noncoronary leaflets (1.4% of BAV cases). This variant is also associated with aortic valve structural complication but is less common than the other 2 variants (Figure).4

Figure.

Figure

Echocardiogram showing (A) bicuspid aortic valve with fused right and left cusps and (B) dilated aortic root. Ao, aorta; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; V, ventricle.

In BAV, the aortic leaflets tend to calcify progressively and in more diffuse fashion compared to the degenerative aortic valve disease, jeopardizing valve structure and function.2,5 Further, early calcification of BAV is the leading cause of aortic valve insufficiency because of ascending aortic dilatation that occurs in 50% of patients with BAV at young ages.6 When the aortic root reaches 6 cm, aortic dissection risk increases 9-fold.7 Interestingly, 32% of first-degree relatives of BAV patients were found to have aortic dilatation irrespective of their aortic valve morphology.8,9

Diagnosis

BAV with normal function is largely asymptomatic. Symptoms usually reflect the development of an underlying valvular dysfunction and progressive aortopathy. Decreased exercise tolerance and exertional dizziness are indicative of valvular stenosis, while palpitations, exertional dyspnea, and atypical chest pain are characteristic of valvular insufficiency.10 Often, auscultation findings of BAV are nonspecific, ranging from an ejection click with or without systolic ejection murmur in valvular stenosis to diastolic murmur in valvular insufficiency. Therefore, echocardiography is required to establish the anatomic and functional valvular diagnosis, as well as to identify any coexisting structural features such as septal defects (Figure). Echocardiography assessment should include ascending aortic diameters and root measurements.11

Genetics, Screening, and Surveillance

BAV follows an autosomal dominant inheritance; first-degree family members are at 10-fold increased risk.12,13 Although most BAV cases are isolated, BAV could be a representation of a genetic syndrome that involves other congenital heart defects such as coarctation of the aorta, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, or ventricular septal defect.14 A significant percentage of patients with BAV require a cardiac intervention during their lifetimes, up to 40% during patients' fifth decade.15 Therefore, current guidelines recommend screening the first-degree relatives of patients with BAV (Table).6,11,16-20

Table.

Screening and Surgical Intervention Recommendations for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients

graphic file with name i1524-5012-18-1-9-t01.jpg

Following the first screening echocardiography, serial surveillance imaging of patients with identified BAV is necessary to monitor for progressive valvular dysfunction. Young patients (<30 years) with a mean gradient ≥30 mmHg are required to have annual echocardiography and electrocardiogram, while the requirement is every other year for patients with a mean gradient <30 mmHg.10,16 Once the ascending aorta diameter reaches the 40-mm cutoff, regardless of the patient's age, annual echocardiography should be obtained, preferably with a baseline computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for adequate visualization.6,11 Surgical intervention is advised in asymptomatic patients with an ascending aorta diameter >55 mm or a diameter of 45 mm with severe aortic valve stenosis, severe aortic valve insufficiency, or a positive family history of aortic dissection or aneurysmal rupture. Surgery is recommended for patients with progressive aortic root dilatation of ≥5 mm per year.6

Women of childbearing age who have BAV with an aortic diameter >45 mm should be advised against pregnancy. Similarly, athletes with an ascending aorta or root diameter >45 mm should refrain from high-intensity sports.21 All patients with BAV are strongly urged to quit smoking and maintain a well-controlled blood pressure. First-line agents to control blood pressure are beta-adrenergic blockers because of their noted effect of wall shear stress reduction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are advantageous as well because of their acknowledged afterload reduction.21 Hypertension management is guided by the valvular disorder and aortic dilatation associated with BAV. In patients with aortic stenosis, beta blockers are recommended while monitoring diastolic blood pressure to avoid the reduction in coronary perfusion. In patients with BAV and aortic insufficiency, long-term vasodilator therapy is recommended (ACEIs, ARBs, or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers). In the setting of aortic dilatation, beta blockers were found to be beneficial in asymptomatic mild to moderate dilatation as they have negative inotropic and chronotropic effect and lessen the growth rate.22

Summary

All first-degree family members of patients with BAV should be screened for BAV with full echocardiogram. This practice will identify individuals with BAV and risk stratify them for complications related to aortic valve or aortic root dilatation.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Braverman AC., Güven H., Beardslee MA., Makan M., Kates AM., Moon MR. The bicuspid aortic valve. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005. September; 30 9: 470- 522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Roberts WC., Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2005. February 22; 111 7: 920- 925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart. 2000. January; 83 1: 81- 85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fernandes SM., Sanders SP., Khairy P., et al. Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. October 19; 44 8: 1648- 1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wallby L., Janerot-Sjöberg B., Steffensen T., Broqvist M. T lymphocyte infiltration in non-rheumatic aortic stenosis: a comparative descriptive study between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves. Heart. 2002. October; 88 4: 348- 351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease Representative Members, Hiratzka LF. Creager MA. et al. Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a statement of clarification from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2016 Feb 16; 133 7: 680- 686. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Larson EW., Edwards WD. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol. 1984. March 1; 53 6: 849- 855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Biner S., Rafique AM., Ray I., Cuk O., Siegel RJ., Tolstrup K. Aortopathy is prevalent in relatives of bicuspid aortic valve patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. June 16; 53 24: 2288- 2295. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Loscalzo ML., Goh DL., Loeys B., Kent KC., Spevak PJ., Dietz HC. Familial thoracic aortic dilation and bicommissural aortic valve: a prospective analysis of natural history and inheritance. Am J Med Genet A. 2007. September 1; 143A 17: 1960- 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Leech G., Mills P., Leatham A. The diagnosis of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Br Heart J. 1978. September; 40 9: 941- 950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hiratzka LF. Bakris GL. Beckman JA. et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Association for Thoracic Surgery; American College of Radiology; American Stroke Association; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Society for Vascular Medicine. . 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6; 55 14: e27- e129. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Siu SC., Silversides CK. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. June 22; 55 25: 2789- 2800. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Huntington K., Hunter AG., Chan KL. A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997. December; 30 7: 1809- 1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Prakash SK., Bossé Y., Muehlschlegel JD., et al. BAVCon Investigators. A roadmap to investigate the genetic basis of bicuspid aortic valve and its complications: insights from the International BAVCon (Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. August 26; 64 8: 832- 839. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Michelena HI., Desjardins VA., Avierinos JF., et al. Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation. 2008. May 27; 117 21: 2776- 2784. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nishimura RA., Otto CM., Bonow RO., et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10; 63 22: e57- e185. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); Vahanian A. Alfieri O. Andreotti F. et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012. October; 33 19: 2451- 2496. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Erbel R., Aboyans V., Boileau C., et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines; 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1; 35 41: 2873- 2926. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Svensson LG., Adams DH., Bonow RO., et al. Aortic valve and ascending aorta guidelines for management and quality measures: executive summary. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. April; 95 4: 1491- 1505. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Boodhwani M., Andelfinger G., Leipsic J., et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement on the management of thoracic aortic disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014. June; 30 6: 577- 589. 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Verma S., Siu SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N Engl J Med. 2014. May 15; 370 20: 1920- 1929. 10.1056/NEJMra1207059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nataf P., Lansac E. Dilation of the thoracic aorta: medical and surgical management. Heart. 2006. September; 92 9: 1345- 1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Ochsner Journal are provided here courtesy of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

RESOURCES