Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: Occup Environ Med. 2014 Dec 15;72(3):235. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102572

Early, but not late chronotypes, are up during their biological night when working the night shift

Céline Vetter 1, Eva Schernhammer 1
PMCID: PMC5856194  NIHMSID: NIHMS947864  PMID: 25510823

Bhatti et al.1 recently examined the impact of chronotype on melatonin levels in shift-workers and concluded that ‘(…) morning type shift-workers were better able to maintain normal patterns of melatonin secretion (…), suggesting that morning types may be protected against the negative effects of shift-work related melatonin disruption.’ However, their data show that, compared to daytime workers sleeping at night, early chronotypes have lower melatonin levels than late chronotypes during daytime sleep after a nightshift. They also show a larger difference in melatonin secretion during their first regular nighttime sleep after night shifts (Table 3, dichotomous categorization: Δ= -34.6% and late types: Δ= -4.2%), suggesting that early chronotypes are more affected by working night shifts than late ones.

This makes sense when considering the biological definition of chronotype2, where early chronotypes, with an earlier subjective, internal night, exhibit earlier peak melatonin secretion than late chronotypes3. Night shift-work consequently coincides with the subjective night of early types, but only partially (or not) for later chronotypes, so that earlier ones should be affected most from working at night. Indeed, we have shown that early chronotypes experience poorer and shorter sleep after night shifts, as compared to later ones4. Recent evidence, which reported lower 24h melatonin levels in early vs. late chronotype night shift workers, provides further support for this assertion.5

Overall, the paper by Bhatti and colleagues remains challenging to interpret due to several limitations, including 1) their non-validated chronotyping approach with arbitrary cut-off values; and 2) the a priori exclusion of night shift-workers who sleep during the day on days off (likely representing extreme late chronotypes).

Future studies that evaluate working times both on an external (social) as well as an internal (biological) time-scale are needed to elucidate the interplay between working times and the circadian system in greater detail.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Bhatti P, Mirick DK, Davis S. The impact of chronotype on melatonin levels among shift workers. Occup Environ Medicine. 2014 doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roenneberg T. What is chronotype? Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2012;10:75–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kitamura S, et al. Validity of the Japanese version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire. Chronobiol Int. 0:1–6. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.914035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Juda M, Vetter C, Roenneberg T. Chronotype modulates sleep duration, social jetlag and sleep quality in shift-workers. J Biol Rhythms. 2013;28:141–151. doi: 10.1177/0748730412475042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Papantoniou K, et al. Circadian variation of melatonin, light exposure and diurnal preference in day and night shift workers of both sexes. Cancer Epi Biomarkers Prev. 2014 doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES