Skip to main content
MMWR Surveillance Summaries logoLink to MMWR Surveillance Summaries
. 2018 Mar 16;67(4):1–28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6704a1

Geographic Variations in Arthritis Prevalence, Health-Related Characteristics, and Management — United States, 2015

Kamil E Barbour 1,, Susan Moss 2, Janet B Croft 1, Charles G Helmick 1, Kristina A Theis 1, Teresa J Brady 1, Louise B Murphy 1, Jennifer M Hootman 1, Kurt J Greenlund 1, Hua Lu 1, Yan Wang 1
PMCID: PMC5857191  PMID: 29543787

Abstract

Problem/Condition

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis is a common chronic condition affecting an estimated 23% (54 million) of adults in the United States, greatly influencing quality of life and costing approximately $300 billion annually. The geographic variations in arthritis prevalence, health-related characteristics, and management among states and territories are unknown. Therefore, public health professionals need to understand arthritis in their areas to target dissemination of evidence-based interventions that reduce arthritis morbidity.

Reporting Period

2015.

Description of System

The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is an annual, random-digit–dialed landline and cellular telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged ≥18 years residing in the United States. Self-reported data are collected from the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Puerto Rico. Unadjusted and age-standardized prevalences of arthritis, arthritis health-related characteristics, and arthritis management were calculated. County-level estimates were calculated using a validated statistical modeling method.

Results

In 2015, in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, median age-standardized prevalence of arthritis was 23.0% (range: 17.2%–33.6%). Modeled prevalence of arthritis varied considerably by county (range: 11.2%–42.7%). In 13 states that administered the arthritis management module, among adults with arthritis, the age-standardized median percentage of participation in a self-management education course was 14.5% (range: 9.1%–19.0%), being told by a health care provider to engage in physical activity or exercise was 58.5% (range: 52.3%–61.9%), and being told to lose weight to manage arthritis symptoms (if overweight or obese) was 44.5% (range: 35.1%–53.2%). Respondents with arthritis who lived in the quartile of states with the highest prevalences of arthritis had the highest percentages of negative health-related characteristics (i.e., arthritis-attributable activity limitations, arthritis-attributable severe joint pain, and arthritis-attributable social participation restriction; ≥14 physically unhealthy days during the past 30 days; ≥14 mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days; obesity; and leisure-time physical inactivity) and the lowest percentage of leisure-time walking.

Interpretation

The prevalence, health-related characteristics, and management of arthritis varied substantially across states. The modeled prevalence of arthritis varied considerably by county.

Public Health Action

The findings highlight notable geographic variability in prevalence, health-related characteristics, and management of arthritis. Targeted use of evidence-based interventions that focus on physical activity and self-management education can reduce pain and improve function and quality of life for adults with arthritis and thus might reduce these geographic disparities.

Introduction

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis is a common chronic condition that affected an estimated 23% (54 million) of adults in the United States during 2013–2015 (1). Prevalence varies across states (2), counties (2), urban and rural communities (3), and census tracts within the largest U.S. cities (https://www.cdc.gov/500cities). The condition limits activities of 24 million adults (1), is associated with severe joint pain among 15 million adults (4), and is projected to affect 78.4 million adults by 2040 (5). In 2013, total national medical care expenditures and earnings losses attributable to arthritis were $303.5 billion (6). Public health measures focus on increasing physical activity, increasing self-management education, increasing health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise, and encouraging walking.

Since 2003, CDC has conducted surveillance for arthritis using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data (7). The findings in this report can be used by public health professionals to better understand geographic variability in prevalence, health-related characteristics, and management of arthritis between states and territories. Public health professionals can also target evidence-based nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as arthritis self-management education and physical activity, to help decrease the impact of arthritis and perhaps reduce geographic disparities in arthritis health-related characteristics and management.

Methods

To characterize self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis in the United States, Guam, and Puerto Rico, CDC analyzed data from the 2015 BRFSS (Box). First, selected area-level prevalences were estimated, including prevalences of arthritis among adults aged ≥18 years with selected comorbid conditions (i.e., coronary heart disease, diabetes, and obesity). Percentages of health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis (i.e., general health, leisure-time physical activity, activity limitations, and pain) also were estimated. Second, for 13 states with available data, self-management measures for adults with arthritis were examined. Third, to examine possible clustering of arthritis health-related characteristics linear trends were tested between increasing prevalence of arthritis and increasing percentages of negative health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis at the state level. Detailed arthritis surveillance estimates for states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Puerto Rico are available online for 2011, 2013, and 2015 (https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/data_statistics/state-data-list-current.htm), but are unpublished elsewhere.

BOX. Understanding geographic variations in arthritis prevalence, health-related characteristics, and management.

Aim 1: Estimate prevalence among adults

  • Prevalence of arthritis among adults with comorbid conditions (coronary heart disease, diabetes, and obesity)

  • Prevalence of obesity among adults with arthritis

  • Prevalence of leisure-time walking among adults with arthritis

  • Prevalence of physical inactivity among adults with arthritis

  • Prevalence of two types of negative health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis: general health (physically and mentally unhealthy days) and arthritis-attributable impact (activity limitations, severe joint pain, and social participation restriction)

Aim 2: Estimate management among adults with arthritis

  • Prevalence of participation in arthritis self-management education course

  • Prevalence of health care provider counseling for weight loss

  • Prevalence of health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise

Aim 3: Examine possible state-specific clustering of health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis

Data Source and Measurements

BRFSS is an annual, random-digit–dialed landline and cellular telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. adult population aged ≥18 years. Self-reported data are collected from the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Puerto Rico. In 2015, a total of 441,456 interviews were completed and analyzed for this report. Response rates ranged from 33.9% to 61.1% (median: 47.2%). The response rate was the number of respondents who completed the survey as a proportion of all eligible and likely eligible persons. Response rates for BRFSS were calculated using standards set by American Association for Public Opinion Research response rate formula no. 4. Additional information is available at https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/2015_responserates.html.

Respondents were classified as having doctor-diagnosed arthritis (hereafter referred to as arthritis) if they answered yes to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?” Three comorbid conditions were examined: obesity, diabetes, and coronary heart disease. Body mass index (BMI) was computed from self-reported height and weight. Obesity was categorized as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Doctor-diagnosed diabetes (hereafter referred to as diabetes) was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have diabetes?” Those with prediabetes or borderline diabetes and women who had diabetes only during pregnancy were classified as not having diabetes. Doctor-diagnosed coronary heart disease (hereafter referred to as coronary heart disease) was defined as a yes response to either of the following two questions: 1) “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had a heart attack, also called a myocardial infarction?” or 2) “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had angina or coronary heart disease?”

Prevalence of Arthritis

The prevalence of arthritis was estimated among all adults. Prevalence was estimated separately for adults with comorbid conditions (i.e., obesity, coronary heart disease, and diabetes).

Health-Related Characteristics

General Health. Two measures of health-related quality of life were examined. For physically and mentally unhealthy days, respondents reported the number of days during the past 30 days that their physical or mental health, or both, was not good. For each measure, a standard predetermined cutoff point of ≥14 days during the past 30 days was used to identify respondents with poor physical or mental health, respectively (8).

Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Obesity. Among adults with arthritis, the prevalences of obesity, leisure-time physical inactivity, and leisure-time walking were estimated. Leisure-time physical inactivity was defined as a no response to the question “During the past month, other than your regular job, did you participate in any physical activities or exercises such as running, calisthenics, golf, gardening, or walking for exercise?” Among those who answered yes, leisure-time walking was ascertained via two questions: 1) “What type of physical activity or exercise did you spend the most time doing during the past month?” and 2) “What other type of physical activity gave you the next most exercise during the past month?” For the leisure-time walking measure, the numerator was adults with arthritis who listed walking as one of their top two activities and the denominator included both active and inactive adults with arthritis.

Activity Limitations. Among adults with arthritis, arthritis-attributable activity limitations were identified by a yes response to the question “Are you now limited in any way in any of your usual activities because of arthritis or joint symptoms?” Arthritis-attributable social participation restriction was defined as a response of a lot to the question “During the past 30 days, to what extent has your arthritis or joint symptoms interfered with your normal social activities, such as going shopping, to the movies, or to religious or social gatherings?”

Pain. Arthritis-attributable severe joint pain was defined according to an a priori criterion (9) as a pain level of 7–10 on a scale of 0–10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is pain or aching as bad as it can be for the question “Please think about the past 30 days, keeping in mind all of your joint pain or aching and whether or not you have taken medication. During the past 30 days, how bad was your joint pain on average?”

Arthritis Management

In 2015, a total of 13 states (California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Utah) administered the BRFSS arthritis management module to respondents with arthritis and ascertained participation in self-management education courses and receipt of health care provider counseling. Among adults with arthritis, attendance at a self-management education course was defined as a yes response to the question “Have you ever taken an educational course or class to teach you how to manage problems related to your arthritis or joint symptoms?” Among those who were overweight (BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2) or obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), health care provider counseling for weight loss was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever suggested losing weight to help your arthritis or joint symptoms?” Health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever suggested physical activity or exercise to help your arthritis or joint symptoms?”

Analyses

Direct Estimates

All directly estimated analyses included adjustment for the complex survey design; sampling weights accounted for nonresponse, noncoverage, and cellular-telephone–only households and were derived from an iterative proportional weighting (raking) procedure (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/pdf/weighting_the-data_webpage_content.pdf). Estimates were age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population using three age groups (18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years) (10). Weighted unadjusted and age-standardized prevalences with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for arthritis and arthritis-related characteristics. For each characteristic, the median and range were calculated using prevalence estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia (not including Guam and Puerto Rico). The unadjusted prevalence is an estimate of the actual prevalence of a characteristic in a specific area. Age-standardized prevalence estimates are provided to permit comparisons across states. Prevalence estimates of arthritis and percentages of selected characteristics among adults with arthritis that had a relative standard error (RSE) ≥30% or unweighted sample size of <50 did not meet the minimum criteria for precision and were suppressed.

Indirect (Modeled) County-Level Arthritis Prevalence Estimates

Prevalence of arthritis at the county level was estimated with a multilevel regression model and poststratification approach (11) for counties (N = 3,142) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The multilevel regression model included individual-level data on age group (13 categories), sex, and race/ethnicity from the 2015 BRFSS; county-level poverty data (percentage below 150% of the federal poverty level) from the American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2011–2015) (12); and random effects at county and state levels. Parameter estimates from the models were applied to Census Vintage 2015 county population estimates to generate county-level estimates of arthritis prevalence. These modeled prevalence estimates were reported in quartiles for the 3,142 counties. High internal validity was established by comparing modeled county-level estimates of arthritis with actual unweighted BRFSS survey estimates in 1,531 counties with ≥50 respondents and RSE <30% (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.78; p<0.001) and with weighted BRFSS estimates in 205 counties with ≥500 respondents (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.94; p<0.001).

State-Specific Clustering of Health-Related Characteristics

States and the District of Columbia were divided into quartiles (lowest to highest) according to age-adjusted state-level prevalence of arthritis in 2015. Age-standardized percentages of seven negative health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis (i.e., arthritis-attributable activity limitations, arthritis-attributable severe joint pain, and arthritis-attributable social participation restriction; ≥14 physically unhealthy days; ≥14 mentally unhealthy days; obesity; and leisure-time physical inactivity) and leisure-time walking were calculated for respondents by quartile of arthritis prevalence. A test of trend using orthogonal polynomial contrasts (by partitioning the sums of squares) was performed to determine whether the age-standardized prevalence of negative health-related characteristics increased and leisure-time walking decreased among adults with arthritis living in states with greater age-standardized prevalence of arthritis. To improve data fit and accommodate nonlinear trends, the test for trend included a quadratic term. For each health-related characteristic, a statistically significant trend in age-standardized percentage across arthritis quartiles was determined at the Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of 0.006 (α = 0.05/8) to adjust for testing multiple characteristics.

Results

Arthritis Prevalence

In 2015, for the 50 states and the District of Columbia, age-standardized median prevalence of arthritis was 23.0% (range: 17.2% in Hawaii to 33.6% in West Virginia) (Table 1). The model-based prevalence estimates of arthritis across the 3,142 U.S. counties in 50 states and the District of Columbia ranged from 11.2% to 42.7% (Figure 1). At the county level, counties in Appalachia and along the lower Mississippi River tended to have higher predicted prevalences of arthritis. The majority of counties in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Tennessee, and West Virginia were in the highest quartile (31.2%–42.7%).

TABLE 1. Prevalence of arthritis,* by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.

Area No. of respondents No. of respondents with arthritis Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
7,950
3,307
1,248,000
33.3 (31.9–34.6)
30.4 (29.2–31.7)
Alaska
3,657
1,028
117,000
21.2 (19.3–23.2)
21.5 (19.7–23.3)
Arizona
7,946
2,663
1,222,000
23.6 (22.5–24.8)
21.8 (20.7–22.9)
Arkansas
5,256
2,228
672,000
29.7 (27.8–31.7)
27.1 (25.4–28.9)
California
12,601
2,803
5,719,000
19.1 (18.3–20.0)
18.3 (17.6–19.1)
Colorado
13,537
4,136
949,000
22.7 (21.8–23.7)
21.8 (20.9–22.7)
Connecticut
11,899
3,962
690,000
24.5 (23.5–25.5)
21.6 (20.8–22.5)
Delaware
4,070
1,471
207,000
28.1 (26.3–29.9)
24.6 (23.1–26.2)
District of Columbia
3,994
1,316
101,000
18.5 (16.7–20.4)
19.9 (18.3–21.7)
Florida
9,739
3,454
4,154,000
25.9 (24.8–27.0)
21.5 (20.6–22.5)
Georgia
4,678
1,660
1,890,000
24.6 (23.1–26.1)
23.6 (22.3–24.9)
Hawaii
7,163
1,757
211,000
18.9 (17.8–20.1)
17.2 (16.2–18.3)
Idaho
5,802
2,031
309,000
25.3 (23.8–26.8)
23.2 (22.0–24.5)
Illinois
5,289
1,671
2,308,000
23.3 (22.0–24.7)
21.6 (20.4–22.7)
Indiana
6,067
2,273
1,390,000
27.6 (26.1–29.1)
25.4 (24.1–26.7)
Iowa
6,227
2,145
619,000
25.9 (24.6–27.2)
23.2 (22.1–24.4)
Kansas
23,236
7,320
536,000
24.5 (23.9–25.2)
22.7 (22.2–23.3)
Kentucky
8,806
3,565
1,087,000
32.0 (30.5–33.5)
29.3 (27.9–30.8)
Louisiana
4,716
1,748
989,000
27.9 (26.4–29.5)
26.2 (24.8–27.7)
Maine
9,063
3,459
332,000
31.0 (29.7–32.3)
26.4 (25.2–27.6)
Maryland
12,598
4,631
1,096,000
23.5 (22.2–24.9)
21.5 (20.4–22.8)
Massachusetts
9,294
2,842
1,300,000
24.1 (23.0–25.3)
22.0 (21.0–23.0)
Michigan
8,935
3,224
2,305,000
30.0 (28.9–31.1)
27.0 (26.0–28.0)
Minnesota
16,761
4,666
907,000
21.6 (20.9–22.3)
19.7 (19.1–20.4)
Mississippi
6,035
2,431
647,000
28.6 (27.1–30.1)
26.6 (25.3–28.0)
Missouri
7,307
2,808
1,372,000
29.3 (27.9–30.8)
26.8 (25.5–28.2)
Montana
6,051
2,123
216,000
26.8 (25.4–28.3)
23.9 (22.5–25.4)
Nebraska
17,561
5,522
334,000
23.4 (22.6–24.3)
21.5 (20.7–22.3)
Nevada
2,926
918
477,000
21.5 (19.5–23.8)
20.1 (18.2–22.2)
New Hampshire
7,022
2,588
282,000
26.6 (25.3–27.9)
23.0 (21.9–24.2)
New Jersey
11,465
3,442
1,590,000
22.9 (21.8–24.1)
20.5 (19.5–21.5)
New Mexico
6,734
2,248
386,000
24.5 (23.1–25.9)
22.2 (21.0–23.5)
New York
12,357
3,921
3,629,000
23.4 (22.5–24.3)
21.5 (20.6–22.3)
North Carolina
6,698
2,144
2,089,000
26.9 (25.7–28.2)
24.9 (23.8–26.0)
North Dakota
4,972
1,585
134,000
22.9 (21.5–24.3)
21.6 (20.4–22.9)
Ohio
11,929
4,730
2,547,000
28.4 (27.2–29.7)
25.3 (24.2–26.4)
Oklahoma
6,943
2,692
813,000
27.7 (26.3–29.1)
25.7 (24.5–27.0)
Oregon
5,359
1,828
838,000
26.8 (25.4–28.2)
24.5 (23.2–25.8)
Pennsylvania
5,740
2,059
2,937,000
29.2 (27.8–30.7)
25.7 (24.4–27.0)
Rhode Island
6,206
2,244
226,000
26.9 (25.5–28.4)
24.2 (22.9–25.6)
South Carolina
11,607
4,405
1,105,000
29.1 (28.1–30.2)
26.3 (25.3–27.2)
South Dakota
7,221
2,389
158,000
24.3 (22.8–25.9)
21.8 (20.5–23.2)
Tennessee
5,979
2,466
1,630,000
32.0 (30.3–33.7)
29.4 (27.9–31.1)
Texas
14,697
4,522
4,055,000
20.0 (19.0–21.1)
19.8 (18.9–20.8)
Utah
11,401
2,929
407,000
19.6 (18.8–20.4)
20.8 (20.1–21.6)
Vermont
6,489
2,089
136,000
27.0 (25.7–28.3)
23.4 (22.3–24.6)
Virginia
8,646
2,684
1,513,000
23.2 (22.1–24.3)
21.6 (20.6–22.6)
Washington
16,116
5,481
1,346,000
24.5 (23.6–25.3)
22.6 (21.9–23.4)
West Virginia
5,957
2,537
557,000
38.0 (36.6–39.4)
33.6 (32.3–34.9)
Wisconsin
6,188
1,984
1,104,000
24.7 (23.3–26.2)
22.1 (20.8–23.5)
Wyoming
5,492
2,021
116,000
25.9 (24.2–27.5)
24.1 (22.6–25.8)
Median (Range)§



25.3 (18.5–38.0)
23.0 (17.2–33.6)
Guam
1,669
270
17,000
15.8 (13.5–18.4)
17.9 (15.5–20.6)
Puerto Rico 5,405 1,616 635,000 22.8 (21.5–24.0) 20.6 (19.5–21.7)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

FIGURE 1.

Map of the United States indicates prevalence of arthritis among adults aged 18 years and older, by county. The data source is the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Model-based prevalence* of arthritis among adults aged ≥18 years, by county — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015

Abbreviation: Q = quartile.

* Prevalence of arthritis at the county level was estimated with a multilevel regression model and poststratification approach for counties (N = 3,142) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Prevalence was based on the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System definition of arthritis.

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Arthritis Among Adults With Comorbid Conditions

For the 50 states and District of Columbia, the median age-standardized prevalence of arthritis among adults with obesity was 30.9% (range: 24.6% in Texas to 41.2% in West Virginia) (Table 2). The median age-standardized prevalence of arthritis among adults with coronary heart disease was 44.5% (range: 25.6% in the District of Columbia to 72.6% in Iowa) (Table 3). The median age-standardized prevalence of arthritis among adults with diabetes was 37.3% (range: 27.1% in California to 53.7% in Maine) (Table 4).

TABLE 2. Unadjusted* and age-standardized prevalences of arthritis§ among adults ≥18 years with obesity, by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area No. of respondents with obesity Weighted population with arthritis and obesity (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
2,626 512,000
41.4 (38.9–43.9)
37.9 (35.7–40.2)
Alaska
1,059
46,000
29.9 (26.1–34.0)
28.5 (24.9–32.4)
Arizona
1,892
398,000
30.0 (27.4–32.7)
27.5 (25.3–29.7)
Arkansas
1,593
275,000
37.7 (33.9–41.6)
35.0 (31.5–38.7)
California
2,808
1,749,000
26.4 (24.4–28.6)
24.8 (23.1–26.6)
Colorado
2,666
250,000
32.8 (30.3–35.4)
29.4 (27.2–31.7)
Connecticut
2,817
228,000
35.0 (32.7–37.4)
29.9 (27.8–32.0)
Delaware
1,145
70,000
35.6 (31.9–39.3)
30.2 (27.3–33.4)
District of Columbia
899
41,000
36.8 (31.2–42.8)
31.6 (26.6–37.0)
Florida
2,296
1,381,000
34.9 (32.4–37.6)
28.3 (26.1–30.6)
Georgia
1,340
759,000
35.4 (32.3–38.8)
31.3 (28.7–34.0)
Hawaii
1,509
67,000
27.6 (24.8–30.6)
26.8 (24.0–29.8)
Idaho
1,596
105,000
32.0 (29.0–35.1)
29.0 (26.4–31.8)
Illinois
1,547
946,000
32.4 (29.7–35.2)
28.4 (26.1–30.9)
Indiana
1,804
537,000
36.2 (33.2–39.4)
32.4 (29.7–35.3)
Iowa
1,805
241,000
34.4 (31.8–37.2)
30.5 (28.1–33.0)
Kansas
6,318
194,000
33.6 (32.2–34.9)
30.1 (28.9–31.4)
Kentucky
2,871
457,000
41.7 (38.8–44.7)
38.0 (35.2–41.0)
Louisiana
1,570
419,000
35.6 (32.6–38.7)
33.3 (30.6–36.1)
Maine
2,567
122,000
40.3 (37.8–43.0)
34.9 (32.3–37.7)
Maryland
3,437
448,000
36.9 (33.7–40.1)
32.5 (29.5–35.7)
Massachusetts
2,061
422,000
37.2 (34.4–40.2)
31.5 (28.9–34.2)
Michigan
2,582
875,000
39.3 (37.0–41.6)
34.8 (32.7–36.9)
Minnesota
4,213
321,000
32.0 (30.3–33.7)
27.7 (26.0–29.5)
Mississippi
1,964
260,000
34.4 (31.6–37.4)
32.8 (30.4–35.4)
Missouri
2,219
518,000
37.2 (34.5–40.0)
33.7 (31.1–36.3)
Montana
1,430
62,000
35.7 (32.3–39.1)
30.4 (27.2–33.8)
Nebraska
5,371
134,000
32.3 (30.5–34.2)
28.4 (26.7–30.2)
Nevada
700
155,000
28.6 (23.9–33.8)
26.4 (21.9–31.6)
New Hampshire
1,717
94,000
37.0 (34.1–40.0)
31.4 (28.7–34.3)
New Jersey
2,778
539,000
34.3 (31.6–37.0)
29.2 (26.9–31.7)
New Mexico
1,728
127,000
30.3 (27.3–33.4)
29.3 (26.6–32.2)
New York
2,933
1,221,000
34.6 (32.4–36.9)
30.9 (28.8–33.2)
North Carolina
1,808
780,000
37.2 (34.6–39.9)
33.5 (31.1–36.0)
North Dakota
1,477
51,000
30.7 (28.0–33.6)
27.2 (24.8–29.6)
Ohio
3,420
947,000
38.2 (35.7–40.8)
32.6 (30.3–35.1)
Oklahoma
2,126
329,000
35.5 (32.9–38.2)
33.0 (30.6–35.4)
Oregon
1401
302,000
35.3 (32.3–38.4)
32.0 (29.2–34.9)
Pennsylvania
5,740
1,114,000
39.6 (36.6–42.7)
33.7 (30.9–36.6)
Rhode Island
6,206
74,000
36.9 (33.6–40.3)
31.8 (28.7–35.0)
South Carolina
11,607
437,000
38.5 (36.3–40.7)
34.9 (32.9–36.9)
South Dakota
7,221
60,000
31.7 (28.6–35.0)
28.3 (25.6–31.1)
Tennessee
5,979
640,000
40.7 (37.4–44.1)
37.6 (34.5–40.9)
Texas
14,697
1,518,000
26.2 (24.0–28.4)
24.6 (22.9–26.4)
Utah
11,401
137,000
29.3 (27.3–31.4)
28.0 (26.2–29.9)
Vermont
6,489
43,000
37.1 (34.1–40.1)
31.2 (28.4–34.2)
Virginia
8,646
584,000
33.0 (30.5–35.5)
29.6 (27.2–32.0)
Washington
16,116
454,000
34.5 (32.6–36.5)
29.8 (28.1–31.5)
West Virginia
5,957
223,000
46.6 (44.1–49.2)
41.2 (38.7–43.7)
Wisconsin
6,188
417,000
32.6 (29.8–35.6)
28.2 (25.6–31.1)
Wyoming
5,492
41,000
34.1 (30.6–37.7)
31.2 (28.1–34.5)
Median (Range)**


35.0 (26.2–46.6)
30.9 (24.6–41.2)
Guam
1,669
7,000
20.3 (15.9–25.5)
23.4 (19.0–28.5)
Puerto Rico 5,405 215,000 27.5 (25.0–30.2) 25.7 (23.4–28.2)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* The numerator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis and obesity (body mass index ≥30). The denominator was the estimated number of adults with obesity.

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Body mass index ≥30; calculated from self-reported height and weight.

** Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

TABLE 3. Unadjusted* and age-standardized prevalences of arthritis§ among adults aged ≥18 years with coronary heart disease, by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area No. of respondents with coronary heart disease Weighted population with arthritis and coronary heart disease (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized %* (95% CI)
Alabama
874
196,000
64.3 (59.7–68.7)
57.0 (47.0–66.6)
Alaska
223
12,000
49.1 (38.0–60.2)
31.3 (21.8–42.6)
Arizona
732
164,000
51.6 (46.1–57.1)
36.9 (27.8–47.0)
Arkansas
714
122,000
64.6 (58.5–70.3)
57.8 (41.8–72.4)
California
701
708,000
49.0 (43.8–54.2)
38.1 (28.7–48.5)
Colorado
857
99,000
53.4 (48.3–58.4)
48.2 (35.9–60.7)
Connecticut
945
80,000
52.1 (47.7–56.5)
41.2 (30.8–52.4)
Delaware
385
30,000
57.5 (49.5–65.1)
44.4 (27.2–63.0)
District of Columbia
286
11,000
45.9 (34.8–57.3)
25.6 (20.0–32.3)
Florida
1,031
667,000
56.2 (51.9–60.5)
43.0 (31.8–54.9)
Georgia
454
301,000
59.0 (52.6–65.0)
48.3 (34.6–62.3)
Hawaii
409
22,000
43.5 (36.7–50.5)
39.1 (26.9–52.8)
Idaho
469
37,000
53.8 (46.4–61.0)
36.7 (27.2–47.5)
Illinois
457
317,000
53.0 (47.0–58.9)
39.1 (26.0–54.1)
Indiana
672
239,000
60.9 (55.4–66.2)
52.2 (39.6–64.5)
Iowa
516
86,000
59.9 (54.6–65.0)
72.6 (60.6–82.1)
Kansas
1,894
72,000
56.5 (53.8–59.1)
43.5 (36.8–50.3)
Kentucky
1,055
187,000
59.3 (54.3–64.1)
48.4 (38.9–57.9)
Louisiana
527
173,000
61.1 (55.4–66.5)
55.8 (43.2–67.7)
Maine
824
51,000
60.8 (56.1–65.3)
52.6 (40.0–65.0)
Maryland
1,126
140,000
52.3 (46.5–58.0)
38.9 (27.5–51.7)
Massachusetts
656
181,000
56.8 (51.0–62.4)
48.1 (35.1–61.5)
Michigan
788
344,000
62.1 (57.9–66.2)
45.7 (35.2–56.6)
Minnesota
1,131
110,000
50.6 (47.0–54.1)
35.8 (27.9–44.7)
Mississippi
659
110,000
58.2 (52.3–63.9)
43.5 (34.0–53.4)
Missouri
780
204,000
58.3 (53.3–63.1)
38.2 (29.2–48.1)
Montana
502
26,000
57.9 (51.6–63.9)
44.0 (27.3–62.2)
Nebraska
1,447
43,000
51.8 (47.9–55.7)
35.8 (29.5–42.7)
Nevada
247
86,000
63.0 (52.9–72.0)
41.6 (27.5–57.3)
New Hampshire
614
33,000
55.2 (49.9–60.3)
43.4 (27.6–60.7)
New Jersey
848
215,000
55.9 (50.6–61.0)
50.4 (36.5–64.2)
New Mexico
572
50,000
56.0 (49.8–62.0)
30.5 (25.8–35.7)
New York
959
510,000
57.3 (53.0–61.6)
56.1 (44.4–67.3)
North Carolina
580
313,000
57.9 (52.8–62.8)
44.5 (33.4–56.2)
North Dakota
414
18,000
54.1 (47.9–60.1)
55.2 (35.8–73.2)
Ohio
1,295
382,000
61.0 (56.2–65.6)
45.3 (32.4–58.8)
Oklahoma
838
161,000
65.3 (60.2–70.2)
47.9 (36.4–59.6)
Oregon
398
97,000
56.4 (50.1–62.6)
46.4 (30.9–62.7)
Pennsylvania
485
412,000
58.4 (52.4–64.2)
49.9 (33.5–66.3)
Rhode Island
534
30,000
59.8 (53.7–65.6)
60.3 (44.3–74.3)
South Carolina
1,134
162,000
62.0 (58.0–65.8)
51.0 (41.3–60.7)
South Dakota
715
28,000
61.1 (54.9–66.9)
50.8 (36.6–64.9)
Tennessee
703
271,000
63.2 (58.1–68.0)
55.1 (42.7–66.9)
Texas
1,362
606,000
49.9 (44.3–55.5)
36.8 (28.7–45.8)
Utah
618
44,000
53.4 (48.3–58.5)
40.2 (30.6–50.6)
Vermont
477
19,000
57.8 (52.0–63.3)
43.8 (30.9–57.6)
Virginia
637
182,000
51.5 (46.4–56.5)
36.5 (28.9–44.8)
Washington
1,310
180,000
57.4 (53.5–61.3)
47.1 (38.7–55.8)
West Virginia
755
102,000
63.8 (59.7–67.7)
53.7 (44.1–63.1)
Wisconsin
494
134,000
48.9 (42.6–55.2)
35.9 (25.7–47.7)
Wyoming
564
16,000
58.6 (52.0–64.9)
58.6 (39.4–75.5)
Median (Range)**


57.4 (43.5–65.3)
44.5 (25.6–72.6)
Guam
88
3,000
49.1 (33.5–64.9)
42.2 (22.3–65.0)
Puerto Rico 586 126,000 49.2 (44.3–54.2) 37.3 (30.2–44.9)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* The numerator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis and coronary heart disease. The denominator was the estimated number of adults with coronary heart disease.

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Doctor-diagnosed coronary heart disease was defined as a yes response to either of the following two questions: “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had a heart attack, also called a myocardial infarction?” or “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had angina or coronary heart disease?” Those who answered yes to either question were classified as having coronary heart disease. Those who answered no to both questions were classified as not having coronary heart disease.

** Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

TABLE 4. Unadjusted* and age-standardized prevalences of arthritis§ among adults aged ≥18 years with diabetes, by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area No. of respondents with diabetes Weighted population with arthritis and diabetes (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized %* (95% CI)
Alabama
1,355
283,000
56.4 (52.7–60.0)
43.8 (38.0–49.7)
Alaska
346
19,000
44.4 (35.3–53.8)
46.0 (29.6–63.4)
Arizona
1,095
238,000
45.7 (41.6–49.9)
32.6 (27.0–38.8)
Arkansas
951
167,000
58.9 (53.7–64.0)
48.6 (38.4–58.9)
California
1,283
1,088,000
36.4 (32.8–40.2)
27.1 (23.1–31.5)
Colorado
1,216
132,000
47.0 (42.9–51.1)
37.3 (30.3–44.9)
Connecticut
1,379
117,000
45.5 (41.8–49.2)
30.1 (25.0–35.6)
Delaware
606
42,000
50.0 (44.5–55.4)
35.4 (26.8–44.9)
District of Columbia
544
22,000
47.0 (39.2–55.0)
28.2 (22.8–34.2)
Florida
1,394
958,000
53.0 (49.2–56.7)
35.6 (28.9–43.0)
Georgia
752
453,000
52.2 (47.4–56.9)
40.0 (30.8–49.9)
Hawaii
722
37,000
38.7 (34.0–43.7)
32.0 (24.9–40.0)
Idaho
678
46,000
46.8 (41.7–52.0)
37.0 (28.6–46.2)
Illinois
680
452,000
46.1 (41.3–50.9)
34.2 (25.7–44.0)
Indiana
885
297,000
51.5 (46.6–56.3)
37.6 (30.9–44.9)
Iowa
753
110,000
52.1 (47.4–56.7)
32.2 (26.3–38.7)
Kansas
2,863
106,000
50.4 (48.2–52.6)
37.1 (33.8–40.6)
Kentucky
1,457
253,000
55.9 (51.5–60.3)
45.4 (37.9–53.0)
Louisiana
793
241,000
53.7 (49.1–58.4)
41.5 (33.7–49.7)
Maine
1,083
62,000
58.2 (54.0–62.2)
53.7 (43.8–63.3)
Maryland
1,854
207,000
43.5 (39.1–48.1)
34.8 (27.2–43.3)
Massachusetts
983
230,000
48.4 (43.8–53.0)
37.0 (30.3–44.2)
Michigan
1,087
438,000
53.2 (49.5–56.9)
40.6 (34.9–46.5)
Minnesota
1,637
150,000
47.8 (44.8–50.9)
36.9 (30.6–43.6)
Mississippi
1,151
172,000
51.7 (47.5–55.8)
39.7 (33.6–46.0)
Missouri
1,154
297,000
55.5 (51.3–59.6)
53.7 (44.9–62.2)
Montana
652
34,000
53.9 (48.2–59.5)
46.4 (34.2–59.1)
Nebraska
2,046
60,000
48.0 (44.7–51.3)
30.7 (26.5–35.1)
Nevada
337
89,000
41.8 (33.9–50.1)
28.9 (19.1–41.2)
New Hampshire
834
46,000
53.2 (48.6–57.8)
36.3 (28.4–45.0)
New Jersey
1,314
302,000
48.3 (44.1–52.6)
38.3 (29.4–48.0)
New Mexico
919
83,000
46.5 (41.7–51.3)
33.1 (27.2–39.5)
New York
1,469
730,000
48.1 (44.6–51.6)
38.8 (32.4–45.7)
North Carolina
855
440,000
53.4 (49.4–57.4)
40.5 (33.9–47.6)
North Dakota
565
22,000
43.8 (38.6–49.1)
27.4 (21.7–33.9)
Ohio
1,861
531,000
53.8 (50.1–57.5)
39.7 (33.0–46.9)
Oklahoma
1,091
188,000
55.0 (50.9–59.0)
44.2 (36.6–52.1)
Oregon
655
157,000
48.0 (43.1–52.9)
40.0 (31.1–49.5)
Pennsylvania
715
575,000
55.2 (50.3–60.1)
40.0 (31.0–49.7)
Rhode Island
748
39,000
51.5 (46.4–56.6)
42.9 (29.9–56.9)
South Carolina
1,837
254,000
56.9 (53.6–60.2)
47.6 (41.4–54.0)
South Dakota
862
28,000
46.9 (41.2–52.6)
31.6 (25.4–38.4)
Tennessee
998
348,000
54.3 (49.6–59.0)
42.2 (35.4–49.4)
Texas
2,269
977,000
42.4 (38.4–46.6)
27.8 (24.4–31.5)
Utah
1,018
68,000
46.7 (42.8–50.6)
33.0 (27.5–39.0)
Vermont
625
20,000
49.3 (44.4–54.3)
37.5 (30.1–45.5)
Virginia
1,129
328,000
48.8 (44.7–53.0)
34.3 (29.6–39.4)
Washington
1,782
219,000
47.8 (44.5–51.0)
35.4 (30.2–41.1)
West Virginia
962
132,000
62.4 (58.8–65.9)
52.3 (46.1–58.4)
Wisconsin
678
161,000
43.4 (38.2–48.8)
28.3 (22.9–34.4)
Wyoming
678
19,000
51.7 (46.1–57.2)
47.2 (33.6–61.3)
Median (Range)**


49.3 (36.4–62.4)
37.3 (27.1–53.7)
Guam
192
5,000
39.1 (29.7–49.4)
26.8 (19.2–36.1)
Puerto Rico 1,084 206,000 45.3 (41.8–48.9) 28.1 (23.9–32.8)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* The numerator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis and diabetes. The denominator was the estimated number of adults with diabetes.

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Doctor-diagnosed diabetes was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have diabetes?” Those with prediabetes or borderline diabetes and women who had diabetes only during pregnancy were classified as not having diabetes.

** Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Health-Related Characteristics

General Health

In 2015, the percentage of poor health-related quality of life among adults with arthritis varied substantially by state. The median age-standardized percentage of ≥14 physically unhealthy days during the past 30 days was 27.7% (range: 16.9% in Alaska to 37.5% in Oklahoma) (Table 5). The median age-standardized percentage of ≥14 mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days was 22.3% (range: 14.8% in Hawaii to 31.1% Mississippi) (Table 6).

TABLE 5. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of ≥14 physically unhealthy days during the past 30 days among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and ≥14 physically unhealthy days (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
365,000
30.5 (28.3–32.7)
30.6 (27.2–34.2)
Alaska
117,000
23,000
21.3 (17.9–25.2)
16.9 (13.4–21.2)
Arizona
1,222,000
354,000
29.7 (27.2–32.3)
30.1 (25.8–34.8)
Arkansas
672,000
208,000
32.3 (29.0–35.8)
35.7 (29.8–42.1)
California
5,719,000
1,383,000
24.5 (22.5–26.7)
24.6 (21.3–28.2)
Colorado
949,000
232,000
25.1 (23.1–27.3)
27.7 (23.9–31.7)
Connecticut
690,000
157,000
23.4 (21.5–25.5)
25.1 (21.3–29.2)
Delaware
207,000
48,000
23.9 (21.0–27.0)
24.8 (19.9–30.5)
District of Columbia
101,000
25,000
25.6 (21.2–30.6)
23.0 (15.3–33.1)
Florida
4,154,000
1,190,000
30.0 (27.8–32.4)
33.6 (28.8–38.9)
Georgia
1,890,000
526,000
28.7 (25.8–31.8)
25.0 (20.7–29.9)
Hawaii
211,000
45,000
21.4 (18.8–24.3)
21.0 (16.7–26.2)
Idaho
309,000
68,000
22.8 (20.3–25.4)
24.7 (20.3–29.6)
Illinois
2,308,000
595,000
26.0 (23.2–28.9)
24.8 (19.9–30.4)
Indiana
1,390,000
377,000
28.3 (25.6–31.1)
30.1 (24.9–35.8)
Iowa
619,000
131,000
21.9 (19.7–24.2)
20.4 (16.6–24.7)
Kansas
536,000
119,000
23.0 (21.8–24.2)
22.9 (20.9–25.1)
Kentucky
1,087,000
338,000
31.9 (29.4–34.5)
30.2 (26.2–34.5)
Louisiana
989,000
288,000
30.5 (27.6–33.4)
29.8 (25.3–34.7)
Maine
332,000
82,000
25.2 (23.1–27.5)
29.1 (24.9–33.7)
Maryland
1,096,000
260,000
24.7 (22.0–27.5)
28.7 (23.1–35.0)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
325,000
26.1 (23.8–28.6)
29.0 (25.0–33.3)
Michigan
2,305,000
622,000
27.5 (25.6–29.5)
29.8 (26.5–33.2)
Minnesota
907,000
218,000
24.8 (23.1–26.5)
27.1 (23.7–30.6)
Mississippi
647,000
224,000
35.6 (32.8–38.5)
35.5 (30.8–40.6)
Missouri
1,372,000
390,000
29.1 (26.7–31.7)
29.3 (24.9–34.0)
Montana
216,000
54,000
25.5 (22.8–28.4)
26.7 (21.9–32.1)
Nebraska
334,000
70,000
21.3 (19.7–23.0)
20.3 (17.5–23.4)
Nevada
477,000
126,000
27.5 (22.9–32.5)
30.6 (22.6–40.0)
New Hampshire
282,000
64,000
23.1 (20.9–25.6)
25.5 (20.9–30.8)
New Jersey
1,590,000
378,000
24.8 (22.5–27.1)
24.4 (20.9–28.3)
New Mexico
386,000
111,000
29.3 (26.7–32.1)
27.8 (23.2–33.0)
New York
3,629,000
910,000
26.5 (24.5–28.6)
30.0 (26.0–34.2)
North Carolina
2,089,000
607,000
30.2 (27.7–32.7)
27.8 (24.2–31.6)
North Dakota
134,000
28,000
21.5 (18.8–24.4)
21.7 (17.1–27.0)
Ohio
2,547,000
664,000
26.8 (24.6–29.1)
27.0 (22.8–31.6)
Oklahoma
813,000
278,000
35.2 (32.5–38.0)
37.5 (32.7–42.6)
Oregon
838,000
238,000
29.6 (26.9–32.5)
30.2 (25.8–35.0)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
682,000
23.8 (21.5–26.4)
24.4 (20.4–28.8)
Rhode Island
226,000
61,000
28.4 (25.6–31.3)
32.7 (27.1–38.9)
South Carolina
1,105,000
332,000
31.1 (29.2–33.2)
31.3 (27.8–35.0)
South Dakota
158,000
35,000
22.4 (19.7–25.5)
20.3 (16.5–24.7)
Tennessee
1,630,000
521,000
33.0 (30.2–36.0)
31.9 (27.4–36.8)
Texas
4,055,000
1,035,000
26.7 (24.2–29.3)
25.9 (22.0–30.3)
Utah
407,000
98,000
24.8 (22.8–27.0)
25.3 (22.4–28.4)
Vermont
136,000
33,000
25.3 (22.8–28.0)
26.5 (21.9–31.6)
Virginia
1,513,000
359,000
24.3 (22.1–26.6)
24.5 (20.6–28.8)
Washington
1,346,000
332,000
25.2 (23.5–26.9)
27.7 (24.3–31.3)
West Virginia
557,000
186,000
34.1 (32.0–36.4)
33.1 (29.8–36.5)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
264,000
24.2 (21.7–27.0)
21.1 (17.6–25.0)
Wyoming
116,000
30,000
26.5 (23.3–29.9)
28.9 (23.1–35.4)
Median (Range)


26.0 (21.3–35.6)
27.7 (16.9–37.5)
Guam
17,000
4,000
23.8 (17.5–31.4)
21.5 (14.8–30.2)
Puerto Rico 635,000 196,000 31.0 (28.3–33.8) 30.6 (25.8–35.9)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Respondents with arthritis who answered 14–30 days to the question “Now thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?”

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

TABLE 6. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of ≥14 mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area
Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s)
Weighted population with arthritis and ≥14 mentally unhealthy days (rounded to 1,000s)
Unadjusted % (95% CI)
Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
268,000
22.0 (20.0–24.1)
29.4 (25.8–33.2)
Alaska
117,000
19,000
16.6 (13.2–20.7)
18.0 (13.0–24.4)
Arizona
1,222,000
210,000
17.5 (15.5–19.7)
21.0 (17.3–25.4)
Arkansas
672,000
138,000
21.2 (18.2–24.5)
26.6 (21.2–32.7)
California
5,719,000
934,000
16.6 (14.8–18.5)
21.7 (18.4–25.4)
Colorado
949,000
145,000
15.7 (13.8–17.7)
23.1 (19.3–27.4)
Connecticut
690,000
104,000
15.3 (13.7–17.0)
21.1 (17.7–25.0)
Delaware
207,000
36,000
17.5 (15.0–20.4)
20.1 (15.4–25.7)
District of Columbia
101,000
17,000
17.5 (13.5–22.3)
20.1 (12.4–31.0)
Florida
4,154,000
772,000
19.0 (17.1–21.2)
23.9 (20.0–28.3)
Georgia
1,890,000
343,000
18.8 (16.2–21.7)
21.0 (16.1–26.9)
Hawaii
211,000
24,000
11.7 (9.7–13.9)
14.8 (10.9–19.9)
Idaho
309,000
46,000
15.3 (13.0–17.9)
22.2 (17.5–27.7)
Illinois
2,308,000
330,000
14.6 (12.4–17.0)
19.3 (15.0–24.5)
Indiana
1,390,000
241,000
17.8 (15.5–20.4)
24.4 (19.4–30.2)
Iowa
619,000
85,000
13.9 (12.0–16.1)
22.3 (17.8–27.6)
Kansas
536,000
77,000
14.6 (13.6–15.7)
20.3 (18.2–22.6)
Kentucky
1,087,000
224,000
21.1 (18.6–23.8)
26.5 (21.9–31.7)
Louisiana
989,000
199,000
20.6 (18.2–23.3)
25.6 (21.2–30.6)
Maine
332,000
57,000
17.6 (15.7–19.6)
25.0 (21.1–29.4)
Maryland
1,096,000
204,000
19.0 (16.5–21.9)
29.9 (24.2–36.2)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
238,000
18.8 (16.7–21.1)
26.3 (22.3–30.9)
Michigan
2,305,000
408,000
18.0 (16.3–19.8)
24.0 (20.9–27.4)
Minnesota
907,000
118,000
13.3 (12.0–14.7)
19.5 (16.6–22.7)
Mississippi
647,000
148,000
23.6 (21.0–26.4)
31.1 (26.3–36.3)
Missouri
1,372,000
263,000
19.6 (17.2–22.1)
25.8 (21.1–31.1)
Montana
216,000
34,000
16.0 (13.6–18.7)
21.8 (16.9–27.7)
Nebraska
334,000
43,000
13.1 (11.8–14.6)
16.7 (13.9–20.1)
Nevada
477,000
93,000
19.9 (15.4–25.3)
30.0 (21.5–40.2)
New Hampshire
282,000
45,000
16.3 (14.3–18.5)
24.1 (19.2–29.8)
New Jersey
1,590,000
249,000
16.0 (14.1–18.2)
21.3 (17.2–26.2)
New Mexico
386,000
65,000
17.2 (15.0–19.7)
21.6 (17.2–26.8)
New York
3,629,000
636,000
18.2 (16.4–20.1)
23.3 (19.9–27.0)
North Carolina
2,089,000
404,000
19.7 (17.6–22.0)
24.6 (20.8–28.8)
North Dakota
134,000
17,000
13.3 (10.7–16.4)
21.7 (16.2–28.3)
Ohio
2,547,000
470,000
18.9 (16.8–21.1)
25.6 (21.3–30.3)
Oklahoma
813,000
179,000
22.6 (20.2–25.2)
28.6 (24.1–33.5)
Oregon
838,000
167,000
20.6 (18.1–23.3)
27.4 (22.9–32.5)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
478,000
16.6 (14.5–18.9)
21.0 (17.0–25.5)
Rhode Island
226,000
41,000
18.4 (16.0–21.2)
26.9 (21.5–33.2)
South Carolina
1,105,000
238,000
22.3 (20.5–24.2)
28.4 (24.9–32.3)
South Dakota
158,000
18,000
11.3 (9.2–13.9)
15.7 (11.6–21.1)
Tennessee
1,630,000
337,000
21.0 (18.6–23.7)
25.8 (21.3–30.8)
Texas
4,055,000
658,000
16.7 (14.6–19.1)
23.2 (18.8–28.3)
Utah
407,000
66,000
16.7 (14.9–18.6)
20.4 (17.6–23.5)
Vermont
136,000
20,000
15.1 (13.1–17.2)
20.3 (16.4–24.9)
Virginia
1,513,000
207,000
14.0 (12.2–15.9)
19.7 (16.2–23.8)
Washington
1,346,000
211,000
15.9 (14.5–17.4)
20.8 (17.9–24.1)
West Virginia
557,000
127,000
23.5 (21.5–25.5)
28.5 (25.3–32.0)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
173,000
15.8 (13.5–18.4)
22.0 (17.2–27.6)
Wyoming
116,000
18,000
15.8 (13.3–18.7)
20.0 (15.5–25.5)
Median (Range)


17.5 (11.3–23.6)
22.3 (14.8–31.1)
Guam
17,000
3,000
15.5 (10.9–21.5)
18.1 (11.5–27.3)
Puerto Rico 635,000 144,000 23.0 (20.5–25.6) 27.7 (22.9–33.0)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Respondents with arthritis who answered 14–30 days to the question “Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?”

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Obesity

In 2015, for leisure-time physical inactivity, the median age-standardized percentage among adults with arthritis was 35.0% (range: 23.1% in California to 47.9% in Mississippi) (Table 7). States in the western United States (e.g., California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington) tended to have the lowest prevalence of leisure-time physical inactivity among adults with arthritis, whereas states primarily in Appalachia and along the Ohio River and Mississippi River had the highest percentage of leisure-time physical inactivity (Figure 2). Age-standardized percentage of leisure-time physical inactivity was ≥40% in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas. For the 50 states and the District of Columbia, the median age-standardized percentage of leisure-time walking was 48.0% (range: 38.5% in West Virginia to 59.5% in Montana) (Table 8). Leisure-time walking tended to be highest in western states (e.g., California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington) and lowest in states primarily in Appalachia and along the Ohio River and Mississippi River (e.g., Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, and West Virginia) (Figure 3).

TABLE 7. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of physical inactivity among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and physical inactivity (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
488,000
43.7 (41.2–46.2)
40.0 (36.2–44.0)
Alaska
117,000
33,000
31.8 (27.1–36.9)
30.8 (24.1–38.5)
Arizona
1,222,000
357,000
33.7 (31.1–36.4)
31.8 (27.0–36.9)
Arkansas
672,000
280,000
47.6 (43.8–51.5)
44.3 (38.0–50.8)
California
5,719,000
1,217,000
24.7 (22.5–27.1)
23.1 (19.8–26.9)
Colorado
949,000
218,000
27.0 (24.9–29.3)
25.2 (21.8–28.9)
Connecticut
690,000
195,000
32.5 (30.4–34.7)
26.7 (23.4–30.2)
Delaware
207,000
78,000
41.8 (38.2–45.5)
37.5 (31.1–44.3)
District of Columbia
101,000
25,000
30.9 (26.1–36.1)
24.9 (16.2–36.2)
Florida
4,154,000
1,396,000
39.1 (36.6–41.7)
36.6 (31.3–42.2)
Georgia
1,890,000
650,000
38.9 (35.6–42.3)
35.9 (29.6–42.6)
Hawaii
211,000
50,000
26.0 (23.2–29.0)
29.0 (23.7–34.8)
Idaho
309,000
87,000
31.1 (28.2–34.1)
28.6 (23.9–33.8)
Illinois
2,308,000
768,000
36.4 (33.4–39.5)
33.4 (28.1–39.0)
Indiana
1,390,000
505,000
40.9 (37.8–44.0)
37.0 (31.3–43.1)
Iowa
619,000
205,000
37.5 (34.7–40.3)
38.5 (33.0–44.3)
Kansas
536,000
173,000
36.9 (35.5–38.3)
33.0 (30.6–35.5)
Kentucky
1,087,000
423,000
44.1 (41.2–47.0)
39.9 (35.4–44.7)
Louisiana
989,000
375,000
44.6 (41.3–48.0)
40.1 (34.7–45.6)
Maine
332,000
111,000
36.9 (34.5–39.2)
36.0 (31.7–40.5)
Maryland
1,096,000
355,000
38.0 (34.9–41.2)
37.1 (31.2–43.5)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
408,000
37.7 (34.9–40.5)
36.0 (31.3–41.0)
Michigan
2,305,000
747,000
35.7 (33.5–37.9)
34.0 (30.5–37.7)
Minnesota
907,000
275,000
33.1 (31.3–35.0)
30.7 (27.3–34.3)
Mississippi
647,000
297,000
50.1 (47.0–53.1)
47.9 (42.7–53.1)
Missouri
1,372,000
466,000
37.3 (34.6–40.2)
36.6 (31.6–41.9)
Montana
216,000
61,000
30.3 (27.4–33.4)
28.9 (24.0–34.4)
Nebraska
334,000
104,000
34.0 (32.1–36.0)
28.5 (25.2–32.2)
Nevada
477,000
140,000
33.0 (27.9–38.5)
31.0 (23.1–40.1)
New Hampshire
282,000
87,000
35.0 (32.3–37.7)
33.0 (27.7–38.8)
New Jersey
1,590,000
523,000
37.1 (34.4–39.8)
32.8 (28.4–37.4)
New Mexico
386,000
104,000
30.3 (27.6–33.2)
29.1 (24.1–34.7)
New York
3,629,000
1,241,000
41.1 (38.8–43.4)
39.7 (35.3–44.1)
North Carolina
2,089,000
749,000
39.9 (37.2–42.7)
37.1 (32.8–41.6)
North Dakota
134,000
45,000
37.4 (34.1–40.7)
35.1 (29.3–41.4)
Ohio
2,547,000
884,000
39.2 (36.7–41.7)
35.7 (31.3–40.5)
Oklahoma
813,000
340,000
45.9 (43.1–48.7)
41.9 (37.1–46.8)
Oregon
838,000
193,000
26.8 (24.0–29.7)
24.0 (19.9–28.7)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
1,010,000
39.2 (36.3–42.3)
38.0 (32.9–43.4)
Rhode Island
226,000
75,000
38.5 (35.5–41.7)
36.8 (30.5–43.6)
South Carolina
1,105,000
373,000
37.6 (35.5–39.7)
35.0 (31.4–38.7)
South Dakota
158,000
43,000
29.7 (26.4–33.2)
23.4 (19.3–28.0)
Tennessee
1,630,000
575,000
41.2 (38.0–44.5)
38.9 (33.7–44.3)
Texas
4,055,000
1,519,000
43.0 (40.0–46.0)
43.4 (38.5–48.5)
Utah
407,000
106,000
29.4 (27.2–31.6)
28.0 (24.8–31.4)
Vermont
136,000
40,000
32.1 (29.4–35.0)
31.0 (26.4–36.1)
Virginia
1,513,000
520,000
38.1 (35.4–40.9)
36.3 (31.9–40.9)
Washington
1,346,000
317,000
26.3 (24.6–28.0)
25.8 (22.6–29.4)
West Virginia
557,000
209,000
41.0 (38.7–43.4)
38.6 (35.0–42.3)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
281,000
29.0 (26.2–32.1)
24.6 (19.9–30.0)
Wyoming
116,000
37,000
35.2 (31.8–38.8)
34.4 (28.6–40.7)
Median (Range)


37.1 (24.7–50.1)
35.0 (23.1–47.9)
Guam
17,000
7,000
45.7 (37.1–54.5)
39.6 (29.8–50.2)
Puerto Rico 635,000 371,000 60.5 (57.5–63.5) 58.1 (52.1–63.8)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Physical inactivity was defined as a no response to the question “During the past month, other than your regular job, did you participate in any physical activities or exercises such as running, calisthenics, golf, gardening, or walking for exercise?”

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

FIGURE 2.

Map of the United States indicates the prevalence of physical inactivity among adults aged 18 years and older with arthritis, by state. The data source is the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Age-standardized prevalence of physical inactivity* among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis, by state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015

Abbreviations: DC = District of Columbia; Q = quartile.

* Physical inactivity was defined as a no response to the question “During the past month, other than your regular job, did you participate in any physical activities or exercises such as running, calisthenics, golf, gardening, or walking for exercise?”

TABLE 8. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of walking among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and walking (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
501,000
43.6 (41.1–46.0)
44.8 (40.7–48.9)
Alaska
117,000
59,000
53.9 (48.9–58.8)
52.3 (44.8–59.7)
Arizona
1,222,000
570,000
51.5 (48.7–54.3)
50.8 (45.3–56.2)
Arkansas
672,000
249,000
40.6 (37.0–44.3)
41.8 (35.4–48.4)
California
5,719,000
2,996,000
59.4 (56.7–62.0)
55.6 (51.3–59.9)
Colorado
949,000
464,000
55.4 (52.9–57.7)
55.4 (50.9–59.8)
Connecticut
690,000
308,000
49.4 (47.2–51.7)
51.5 (47.1–55.9)
Delaware
207,000
83,000
42.9 (39.4–46.4)
43.1 (36.5–49.9)
District of Columbia
101,000
50,000
53.6 (48.2–59.0)
51.9 (40.2–63.5)
Florida
4,154,000
1,751,000
47.2 (44.7–49.7)
46.9 (41.4–52.4)
Georgia
1,890,000
829,000
47.7 (44.4–51.1)
45.2 (38.8–51.7)
Hawaii
211,000
101,000
52.1 (48.8–55.4)
47.2 (41.4–53.1)
Idaho
309,000
157,000
54.1 (50.9–57.3)
53.0 (47.3–58.5)
Illinois
2,308,000
949,000
44.6 (41.5–47.7)
45.7 (39.9–51.6)
Indiana
1,390,000
615,000
48.3 (45.2–51.4)
51.8 (45.8–57.7)
Iowa
619,000
268,000
47.2 (44.4–50.1)
43.5 (38.1–49.0)
Kansas
536,000
230,000
47.4 (46.0–48.9)
48.9 (46.2–51.5)
Kentucky
1,087,000
426,000
42.9 (40.0–45.8)
46.2 (41.2–51.2)
Louisiana
989,000
377,000
42.3 (39.0–45.6)
46.3 (40.9–51.9)
Maine
332,000
158,000
50.7 (48.2–53.1)
51.0 (46.2–55.7)
Maryland
1,096,000
457,000
46.5 (43.5–49.6)
46.2 (40.2–52.3)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
539,000
46.9 (44.1–49.7)
43.4 (38.9–48.0)
Michigan
2,305,000
1,018,000
46.8 (44.6–49.0)
45.7 (42.1–49.3)
Minnesota
907,000
441,000
51.6 (49.7–53.5)
52.6 (48.9–56.2)
Mississippi
647,000
248,000
40.2 (37.4–43.1)
40.3 (35.3–45.5)
Missouri
1,372,000
592,000
46.1 (43.4–49.0)
48.0 (42.7–53.3)
Montana
216,000
120,000
57.9 (54.8–60.9)
59.5 (53.8–64.9)
Nebraska
334,000
161,000
51.0 (48.9–53.1)
52.9 (48.7–57.1)
Nevada
477,000
226,000
51.2 (45.5–56.9)
49.3 (39.9–58.9)
New Hampshire
282,000
129,000
49.9 (47.1–52.6)
49.1 (43.2–55.0)
New Jersey
1,590,000
670,000
45.3 (42.6–48.1)
43.6 (38.8–48.6)
New Mexico
386,000
185,000
52.5 (49.4–55.6)
52.4 (46.3–58.4)
New York
3,629,000
1,540,000
48.3 (46.1–50.6)
47.3 (43.0–51.6)
North Carolina
2,089,000
892,000
45.2 (42.5–47.9)
45.6 (41.1–50.2)
North Dakota
134,000
67,000
52.7 (49.3–56.0)
52.0 (45.5–58.4)
Ohio
2,547,000
1,068,000
45.3 (42.9–47.8)
48.2 (43.4–53.0)
Oklahoma
813,000
315,000
41.1 (38.4–43.8)
43.1 (38.3–48.0)
Oregon
838,000
413,000
54.2 (51.1–57.1)
53.7 (48.5–58.9)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
1,234,000
46.3 (43.4–49.3)
44.4 (39.3–49.6)
Rhode Island
226,000
89,000
43.9 (41.0–46.9)
41.5 (35.6–47.5)
South Carolina
1,105,000
479,000
46.2 (44.1–48.3)
45.3 (41.3–49.2)
South Dakota
158,000
80,000
53.6 (50.0–57.2)
54.5 (47.9–61.0)
Tennessee
1,630,000
680,000
46.3 (43.2–49.5)
46.4 (41.1–51.8)
Texas
4,055,000
1,651,000
45.2 (42.3–48.2)
40.3 (36.1–44.7)
Utah
407,000
201,000
53.6 (51.3–56.0)
53.1 (49.6–56.7)
Vermont
136,000
69,000
53.3 (50.4–56.1)
53.5 (48.3–58.6)
Virginia
1,513,000
663,000
46.6 (44.0–49.3)
46.1 (41.2–51.0)
Washington
1,346,000
710,000
56.4 (54.5–58.3)
54.6 (50.7–58.5)
West Virginia
557,000
208,000
39.0 (36.8–41.3)
38.5 (35.0–42.1)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
544,000
54.4 (51.0–57.7)
57.0 (50.2–63.5)
Wyoming
116,000
54,000
50.2 (46.7–53.8)
50.0 (43.8–56.3)
Median (Range)


47.7 (39.0–59.4)
48.0 (38.5–59.5)
Guam
17,000
6,000
36.3 (28.6–44.7)
34.0 (23.5–46.3)
Puerto Rico 635,000 173,000 27.8 (25.2–30.6) 28.5 (23.4–34.1)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Respondents with arthritis who reported walking or hiking for one of two questions: 1) “What type of physical activity or exercise did you spend the most time doing during the past month?” and 2) “What other type of physical activity gave you the next most exercise during the past month?” The denominator included adults with arthritis who were either physically active or inactive.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

FIGURE 3.

Map of the United States indicates the prevalence of walking among adults aged 18 years and older with arthritis, by state. The data source is the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Age-standardized prevalence of walking* among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis, by state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015

Abbreviations: DC = District of Columbia; Q = quartile.

* Respondents with arthritis who reported walking or hiking for one of two questions: 1) “What type of physical activity or exercise did you spend the most time doing during the past month?” and 2) “What other type of physical activity gave you the next most exercise during the past month?”

For the 50 states and the District of Columbia, the percentage of obesity among adults with arthritis varied substantially. The median age-standardized percentage of obesity was 41.6% (range: 28.1% in California to 48.9% in Arkansas) (Table 9).

TABLE 9. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of obesity among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and obesity (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
512,000
43.8 (41.4–46.2)
45.9 (42.0–49.9)
Alaska
117,000
46,000
41.6 (36.9–46.5)
45.0 (37.8–52.4)
Arizona
1,222,000
398,000
35.6 (33.0–38.4)
34.6 (29.9–39.6)
Arkansas
672,000
275,000
44.2 (40.5–47.9)
48.9 (42.5–55.4)
California
5,719,000
1,749,000
33.0 (30.6–35.6)
33.7 (29.8–37.9)
Colorado
949,000
250,000
28.9 (26.8–31.1)
28.1 (24.7–31.9)
Connecticut
690,000
228,000
35.7 (33.6–37.9)
37.3 (33.2–41.6)
Delaware
207,000
70,000
37.5 (34.1–41.0)
38.4 (32.1–45.1)
District of Columbia
101,000
41,000
43.9 (38.5–49.5)
42.4 (30.7–55.0)
Florida
4,154,000
1,381,000
36.0 (33.6–38.5)
38.4 (33.2–43.8)
Georgia
1,890,000
759,000
42.2 (38.9–45.5)
38.0 (32.6–43.8)
Hawaii
211,000
67,000
32.5 (29.5–35.8)
42.2 (36.6–48.0)
Idaho
309,000
105,000
36.4 (33.3–39.6)
37.3 (32.1–42.8)
Illinois
2,308,000
946,000
42.1 (39.0–45.2)
41.8 (36.2–47.6)
Indiana
1,390,000
537,000
41.7 (38.7–44.7)
44.1 (38.3–50.1)
Iowa
619,000
241,000
42.2 (39.4–45.0)
44.7 (39.3–50.3)
Kansas
536,000
194,000
41.1 (39.7–42.6)
43.2 (40.6–45.9)
Kentucky
1,087,000
457,000
44.9 (42.0–47.9)
48.5 (43.5–53.5)
Louisiana
989,000
419,000
45.3 (42.0–48.6)
48.5 (43.2–53.9)
Maine
332,000
122,000
38.7 (36.3–41.1)
42.3 (37.7–47.0)
Maryland
1,096,000
448,000
44.4 (41.2–47.6)
47.9 (41.8–54.1)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
422,000
36.1 (33.4–38.9)
35.8 (31.5–40.3)
Michigan
2,305,000
875,000
40.4 (38.2–42.6)
42.1 (38.6–45.8)
Minnesota
907,000
321,000
38.3 (36.5–40.2)
40.3 (36.6–44.0)
Mississippi
647,000
260,000
42.0 (39.1–44.9)
44.3 (39.2–49.5)
Missouri
1,372,000
518,000
40.7 (38.0–43.5)
42.9 (37.8–48.2)
Montana
216,000
62,000
31.1 (28.3–34.1)
29.6 (24.8–34.8)
Nebraska
334,000
134,000
42.6 (40.6–44.7)
45.1 (40.9–49.2)
Nevada
477,000
155,000
34.4 (29.2–39.9)
35.2 (26.7–44.7)
New Hampshire
282,000
94,000
36.9 (34.3–39.6)
40.7 (35.0–46.6)
New Jersey
1,590,000
539,000
37.3 (34.6–40.1)
38.7 (34.1–43.6)
New Mexico
386,000
127,000
35.2 (32.2–38.3)
43.1 (37.3–49.1)
New York
3,629,000
1,221,000
36.4 (34.2–38.6)
40.1 (36.0–44.4)
North Carolina
2,089,000
780,000
40.0 (37.3–42.7)
41.4 (37.0–46.0)
North Dakota
134,000
51,000
41.3 (38.1–44.7)
39.7 (34.1–45.6)
Ohio
2,547,000
947,000
40.2 (37.8–42.7)
40.4 (35.7–45.2)
Oklahoma
813,000
329,000
42.9 (40.2–45.7)
44.9 (40.1–49.8)
Oregon
838,000
302,000
39.3 (36.4–42.4)
41.6 (36.6–46.8)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
1,114,000
40.8 (37.9–43.7)
43.3 (38.2–48.5)
Rhode Island
226,000
74,000
35.1 (32.2–38.1)
34.7 (29.1–40.7)
South Carolina
1,105,000
437,000
42.0 (39.9–44.1)
46.4 (42.6–50.3)
South Dakota
158,000
60,000
40.4 (36.9–44.0)
41.8 (35.3–48.5)
Tennessee
1,630,000
640,000
42.3 (39.2–45.5)
46.5 (41.3–51.8)
Texas
4,055,000
1,518,000
41.0 (38.1–43.9)
37.6 (33.4–42.0)
Utah
407,000
137,000
36.2 (33.9–38.5)
36.2 (32.9–39.6)
Vermont
136,000
43,000
34.2 (31.5–36.9)
35.7 (30.8–40.9)
Virginia
1,513,000
584,000
41.1 (38.4–43.9)
44.0 (39.2–48.9)
Washington
1,346,000
454,000
36.9 (35.0–38.8)
36.5 (33.0–40.3)
West Virginia
557,000
223,000
43.7 (41.4–46.1)
45.6 (41.9–49.3)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
417,000
40.2 (37.0–43.5)
41.0 (34.9–47.4)
Wyoming
116,000
41,000
37.6 (34.2–41.1)
36.1 (30.6–42.0)
Median (Range)


40.2 (28.9–45.3)
41.6 (28.1–48.9)
Guam
17,000
7,000
39.3 (31.5–47.6)
42.6 (31.9–54.1)
Puerto Rico 635,000 215,000 35.6 (32.6–38.6) 41.1 (35.3–47.2)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Body mass index ≥30; calculated from self-reported height and weight.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Activity Limitations

In 2015, for the 50 states and the District of Columbia, the median age-standardized percentage of arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults with arthritis was 49.7% (range: 40.4% in Iowa to 59.4% in Missouri) (Table 10). The median age-standardized percentage for arthritis-attributable social participation restriction was 19.7% (range: 12.6% in Alaska to 30.4% in Arkansas) (Table 11).

TABLE 10. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of arthritis-attributable activity limitations among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
640,000
56.7 (54.3–59.1)
59.2 (55.2–63.0)
Alaska
117,000
55,000
51.2 (46.2–56.1)
51.1 (43.6–58.6)
Arizona
1,222,000
558,000
52.1 (49.3–54.9)
52.5 (46.9–58.0)
Arkansas
672,000
345,000
57.0 (53.2–60.7)
56.1 (49.4–62.5)
California
5,719,000
2,446,000
49.6 (46.9–52.3)
48.6 (44.2–52.9)
Colorado
949,000
398,000
48.4 (46.0–50.8)
47.6 (43.1–52.1)
Connecticut
690,000
290,000
47.6 (45.3–49.8)
46.7 (42.3–51.2)
Delaware
207,000
90,000
47.1 (43.5–50.8)
46.9 (39.9–54.0)
District of Columbia
101,000
48,000
53.9 (48.4–59.3)
57.0 (45.0–68.2)
Florida
4,154,000
1,941,000
53.1 (50.6–55.6)
54.5 (48.9–59.9)
Georgia
1,890,000
882,000
51.9 (48.4–55.3)
50.9 (44.1–57.6)
Hawaii
211,000
81,000
42.2 (39.0–45.5)
42.0 (36.2–48.0)
Idaho
309,000
137,000
48.0 (44.8–51.2)
50.4 (44.8–56.0)
Illinois
2,308,000
982,000
46.5 (43.3–49.6)
46.3 (40.5–52.2)
Indiana
1,390,000
599,000
47.7 (44.6–50.8)
43.7 (38.1–49.5)
Iowa
619,000
228,000
40.8 (38.1–43.6)
40.4 (34.9–46.0)
Kansas
536,000
228,000
48.2 (46.7–49.7)
46.3 (43.7–49.0)
Kentucky
1,087,000
562,000
57.2 (54.3–60.0)
57.7 (52.7–62.6)
Louisiana
989,000
472,000
53.9 (50.6–57.2)
50.6 (45.0–56.1)
Maine
332,000
149,000
48.5 (46.0–50.9)
51.2 (46.4–56.0)
Maryland
1,096,000
405,000
42.2 (39.2–45.2)
42.2 (36.3–48.4)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
555,000
49.0 (46.2–51.9)
47.0 (42.2–51.9)
Michigan
2,305,000
1,038,000
48.8 (46.6–51.1)
50.3 (46.5–54.0)
Minnesota
907,000
393,000
46.7 (44.8–48.5)
47.0 (43.3–50.6)
Mississippi
647,000
346,000
56.7 (53.7–59.6)
52.4 (47.2–57.4)
Missouri
1,372,000
694,000
54.6 (51.8–57.4)
59.4 (54.5–64.1)
Montana
216,000
103,000
50.2 (47.0–53.4)
52.0 (46.3–57.8)
Nebraska
334,000
137,000
44.0 (41.9–46.1)
44.3 (40.1–48.6)
Nevada
477,000
212,000
48.7 (43.0–54.5)
53.3 (44.2–62.3)
New Hampshire
282,000
115,000
45.6 (42.8–48.3)
49.9 (43.8–55.9)
New Jersey
1,590,000
675,000
46.5 (43.8–49.3)
47.0 (42.0–52.2)
New Mexico
386,000
176,000
50.5 (47.4–53.6)
49.2 (43.1–55.4)
New York
3,629,000
1,503,000
48.3 (46.0–50.6)
45.5 (41.2–49.9)
North Carolina
2,089,000
1,080,000
55.6 (52.9–58.3)
54.5 (49.9–59.0)
North Dakota
134,000
57,000
46.3 (42.9–49.6)
47.2 (40.5–53.9)
Ohio
2,547,000
1,136,000
49.1 (46.6–51.6)
46.6 (42.0–51.3)
Oklahoma
813,000
419,000
55.9 (53.2–58.7)
56.9 (51.9–61.7)
Oregon
838,000
425,000
57.1 (54.1–60.1)
54.0 (48.8–59.2)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
1,118,000
42.7 (39.8–45.7)
42.1 (37.0–47.4)
Rhode Island
226,000
89,000
45.1 (42.0–48.2)
44.1 (37.6–50.7)
South Carolina
1,105,000
555,000
54.8 (52.7–56.9)
54.4 (50.3–58.4)
South Dakota
158,000
73,000
48.7 (45.1–52.4)
49.5 (42.7–56.3)
Tennessee
1,630,000
772,000
53.8 (50.6–57.0)
55.2 (49.8–60.5)
Texas
4,055,000
1,773,000
50.0 (47.0–53.0)
48.2 (43.3–53.1)
Utah
407,000
168,000
45.5 (43.1–47.8)
44.2 (40.8–47.8)
Vermont
136,000
61,000
49.0 (46.2–51.9)
48.6 (43.4–53.8)
Virginia
1,513,000
631,000
44.8 (42.2–47.5)
46.7 (41.9–51.6)
Washington
1,346,000
657,000
53.3 (51.4–55.2)
50.6 (46.6–54.5)
West Virginia
557,000
303,000
57.3 (55.0–59.6)
57.5 (53.8–61.2)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
479,000
49.2 (45.9–52.7)
50.9 (44.1–57.7)
Wyoming
116,000
49,000
46.6 (43.0–50.3)
49.7 (43.4–55.9)
Median (Range)


49.0 (40.8–57.3)
49.7 (40.4–59.4)
Guam
17,000
7,000
43.5 (35.4–52.0)
44.6 (33.4–56.3)
Puerto Rico 635,000 353,000 57.0 (54.0–60.0) 60.8 (54.9–66.4)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Respondents with arthritis who answered yes to the question “Arthritis can cause symptoms like pain, aching, or stiffness in or around the joint. Are you now limited in any way in any of your usual activities because of arthritis or joint symptoms?”

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

TABLE 11. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of arthritis-attributable social participation restriction among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and arthritis-attributable social participation restriction (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
321,000
28.5 (26.3–30.9)
29.3 (25.8–33.0)
Alaska
117,000
16,000
14.4 (11.3–18.3)
12.6 (9.3–16.9)
Arizona
1,222,000
212,000
19.7 (17.6–22.0)
18.1 (14.8–22.1)
Arkansas
672,000
165,000
27.3 (24.1–30.9)
30.4 (24.5–37.0)
California
5,719,000
859,000
17.4 (15.6–19.4)
17.6 (14.6–21.0)
Colorado
949,000
128,000
15.5 (13.7–17.4)
16.4 (13.4–20.1)
Connecticut
690,000
97,000
15.9 (14.2–17.8)
14.5 (12.1–17.4)
Delaware
207,000
35,000
18.5 (15.7–21.6)
18.8 (13.4–25.8)
District of Columbia
101,000
22,000
25.2 (20.4–30.7)
26.8 (17.4–38.8)
Florida
4,154,000
843,000
23.3 (21.1–25.6)
25.7 (21.0–31.1)
Georgia
1,890,000
378,000
22.3 (19.5–25.3)
19.8 (15.3–25.3)
Hawaii
211,000
26,000
13.4 (11.1–16.0)
15.9 (11.4–21.7)
Idaho
309,000
53,000
18.7 (16.2–21.6)
22.4 (17.7–28.0)
Illinois
2,308,000
365,000
17.4 (15.0–20.1)
15.0 (11.7–19.0)
Indiana
1,390,000
237,000
18.8 (16.6–21.4)
20.0 (15.7–25.2)
Iowa
619,000
83,000
14.9 (13.0–17.0)
15.3 (11.6–19.9)
Kansas
536,000
84,000
17.6 (16.5–18.8)
17.6 (15.7–19.6)
Kentucky
1,087,000
265,000
27.1 (24.6–29.9)
28.3 (23.6–33.6)
Louisiana
989,000
234,000
26.8 (23.9–29.8)
25.5 (20.8–30.7)
Maine
332,000
52,000
16.9 (15.1–18.9)
21.4 (17.5–25.9)
Maryland
1,096,000
160,000
16.6 (14.4–19.0)
19.7 (14.9–25.7)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
206,000
18.2 (16.1–20.6)
20.0 (16.2–24.5)
Michigan
2,305,000
420,000
19.6 (17.8–21.5)
19.6 (16.8–22.7)
Minnesota
907,000
136,000
16.1 (14.7–17.7)
18.5 (15.5–22.0)
Mississippi
647,000
172,000
28.5 (25.8–31.3)
26.0 (22.1–30.4)
Missouri
1,372,000
255,000
20.2 (18.0–22.5)
23.4 (19.2–28.3)
Montana
216,000
33,000
16.2 (13.8–18.8)
18.6 (14.2–24.0)
Nebraska
334,000
46,000
14.6 (13.2–16.2)
12.9 (10.7–15.6)
Nevada
477,000
98,000
22.7 (17.9–28.3)
26.0 (17.6–36.6)
New Hampshire
282,000
40,000
15.7 (13.8–17.9)
20.2 (15.6–25.8)
New Jersey
1,590,000
241,000
16.8 (14.9–18.9)
18.5 (15.2–22.3)
New Mexico
386,000
71,000
20.6 (18.1–23.2)
21.0 (16.5–26.4)
New York
3,629,000
587,000
19.0 (17.2–20.9)
19.8 (16.4–23.7)
North Carolina
2,089,000
488,000
25.0 (22.7–27.6)
23.7 (20.1–27.6)
North Dakota
134,000
18,000
14.7 (12.5–17.3)
14.8 (10.8–19.9)
Ohio
2,547,000
486,000
21.1 (19.1–23.2)
19.7 (16.6–23.2)
Oklahoma
813,000
207,000
27.5 (24.9–30.3)
29.9 (25.4–34.7)
Oregon
838,000
142,000
19.0 (16.6–21.6)
19.4 (15.7–23.7)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
419,000
16.0 (13.9–18.4)
16.8 (13.0–21.3)
Rhode Island
226,000
39,000
20.0 (17.4–22.9)
25.8 (20.0–32.6)
South Carolina
1,105,000
245,000
24.2 (22.4–26.1)
23.8 (20.5–27.5)
South Dakota
158,000
20,000
13.7 (11.3–16.5)
14.4 (9.5–21.1)
Tennessee
1,630,000
372,000
26.0 (23.2–28.9)
24.7 (20.3–29.6)
Texas
4,055,000
739,000
20.8 (18.5–23.3)
20.7 (16.9–25.2)
Utah
407,000
58,000
15.6 (13.9–17.4)
16.0 (13.6–18.8)
Vermont
136,000
21,000
16.3 (14.1–18.7)
18.9 (14.9–23.6)
Virginia
1,513,000
251,000
17.8 (16.0–19.8)
18.1 (14.9–21.9)
Washington
1,346,000
221,000
17.8 (16.3–19.4)
18.0 (15.3–21.0)
West Virginia
557,000
140,000
26.7 (24.6–28.9)
26.6 (23.5–30.0)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
153,000
15.9 (13.6–18.4)
16.6 (12.8–21.1)
Wyoming
116,000
19,000
17.2 (14.3–20.6)
19.3 (14.1–25.8)
Median (Range)


18.5 (13.4–28.5)
19.7 (12.6–30.4)
Guam
17,000
2,000
12.7 (8.5–18.4)
13.1 (7.7–21.5)
Puerto Rico 635,000 144,000 23.2 (20.8–25.9) 25.9 (21.2–31.2)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Respondents with arthritis who answered a lot to the question “During the past 30 days, to what extent has your arthritis or joint symptoms interfered with your normal social activities, such as going shopping, to the movies, or to religious or social gatherings?”

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Pain

In 2015, the median age-standardized percentage of arthritis-attributable severe joint pain among adults with arthritis was 29.7% (range: 20.3% in Utah to 46.0% in Mississippi) (Table 12). States with the highest age-standardized percentage of arthritis-attributable severe joint pain among adults with arthritis tended be primarily in Appalachia and in the South (Figure 4).

TABLE 12. Unadjusted and age-standardized* percentages of arthritis-attributable severe joint pain among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis,§ by area — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.
Area Weighted population with arthritis (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis and arthritis-attributable severe joint pain (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
Alabama
1,248,000
433,000
39.2 (36.8–41.6)
39.7 (35.7–43.8)
Alaska
117,000



Arizona
1,222,000
328,000
30.6 (28.0–33.3)
32.9 (28.0–38.2)
Arkansas
672,000
218,000
36.3 (32.6–40.1)
41.6 (35.3–48.3)
California
5,719,000
1,510,000
30.2 (27.9–32.7)
29.3 (25.8–33.0)
Colorado
949,000
194,000
24.0 (21.9–26.2)
26.2 (22.3–30.4)
Connecticut
690,000
153,000
25.3 (23.3–27.4)
25.9 (22.3–29.8)
Delaware
207,000
57,000
30.8 (27.3–34.4)
31.6 (25.2–38.7)
District of Columbia
101,000
36,000
40.5 (35.0–46.3)
36.5 (26.5–47.9)
Florida
4,154,000
1,195,000
34.0 (31.5–36.6)
38.0 (32.7–43.7)
Georgia
1,890,000
573,000
34.1 (30.8–37.4)
31.2 (25.7–37.4)
Hawaii
211,000
41,000
21.7 (19.0–24.7)
23.6 (18.9–29.2)
Idaho
309,000
59,000
21.8 (19.1–24.9)
21.9 (17.4–27.3)
Illinois
2,308,000
576,000
27.4 (24.6–30.5)
24.4 (20.2–29.3)
Indiana
1,390,000
302,000
25.5 (22.8–28.4)
26.0 (20.6–32.2)
Iowa
619,000
122,000
22.3 (20.0–24.8)
24.3 (19.7–29.6)
Kansas
536,000
121,000
25.7 (24.4–27.1)
26.2 (23.8–28.6)
Kentucky
1,087,000
349,000
36.3 (33.5–39.1)
36.7 (32.0–41.7)
Louisiana
989,000
356,000
41.1 (37.8–44.4)
41.2 (35.8–46.9)
Maine
332,000
69,000
23.9 (21.6–26.3)
30.3 (25.6–35.4)
Maryland
1,096,000
249,000
26.1 (23.3–29.1)
28.5 (22.8–35.0)
Massachusetts
1,300,000
310,000
28.0 (25.4–30.8)
28.4 (24.1–33.2)
Michigan
2,305,000
605,000
28.7 (26.7–30.8)
30.5 (27.1–34.1)
Minnesota
907,000
181,000
21.8 (20.1–23.5)
23.3 (19.9–27.1)
Mississippi
647,000
270,000
45.5 (42.5–48.5)
46.0 (40.8–51.3)
Missouri
1,372,000
375,000
30.1 (27.6–32.8)
34.0 (29.2–39.2)
Montana
216,000
47,000
23.2 (20.5–26.1)
24.3 (19.7–29.6)
Nebraska
334,000
67,000
21.6 (19.9–23.5)
22.8 (19.4–26.6)
Nevada
477,000
130,000
30.6 (25.6–36.1)
30.2 (22.3–39.3)
New Hampshire
282,000
58,000
23.0 (20.7–25.6)
26.6 (21.6–32.3)
New Jersey
1,590,000
424,000
30.0 (27.5–32.6)
33.6 (28.9–38.7)
New Mexico
386,000
110,000
32.2 (29.3–35.2)
32.7 (27.4–38.5)
New York
3,629,000
821,000
30.9 (28.6–33.3)
32.3 (27.8–37.2)
North Carolina
2,089,000
687,000
35.8 (33.2–38.6)
34.5 (30.3–38.9)
North Dakota
134,000
21,000
19.2 (16.3–22.4)
23.4 (17.8–30.2)
Ohio
2,547,000
695,000
30.4 (28.1–32.8)
30.1 (25.8–34.6)
Oklahoma
813,000
259,000
35.0 (32.3–37.9)
36.9 (32.2–41.9)
Oregon
838,000
178,000
24.3 (21.6–27.2)
25.7 (21.2–30.8)
Pennsylvania
2,937,000
723,000
28.1 (25.5–30.9)
28.7 (23.9–34.0)
Rhode Island
226,000
59,000
29.9 (27.1–33.0)
34.7 (28.6–41.4)
South Carolina
1,105,000
361,000
36.1 (34.0–38.2)
36.7 (32.9–40.7)
South Dakota
158,000
36,000
24.1 (20.9–27.6)
27.3 (21.4–34.2)
Tennessee
1,630,000
481,000
34.2 (31.1–37.4)
35.3 (30.1–40.8)
Texas
4,055,000
1,138,000
33.3 (30.5–36.3)
32.0 (27.5–36.9)
Utah
407,000
77,000
21.2 (19.4–23.2)
20.3 (17.7–23.2)
Vermont
136,000
29,000
23.2 (20.8–25.9)
25.5 (21.0–30.7)
Virginia
1,513,000
381,000
27.5 (25.2–29.9)
26.7 (23.0–30.7)
Washington
1,346,000
282,000
23.0 (21.3–24.6)
22.7 (19.6–26.1)
West Virginia
557,000
204,000
39.8 (37.5–42.1)
41.6 (37.9–45.3)
Wisconsin
1,104,000
232,000
24.0 (21.3–27.0)
23.7 (19.1–28.9)
Wyoming
116,000
22,000
20.7 (17.7–24.2)
22.7 (17.3–29.3)
Median (Range)**


28.4 (19.2–45.5)
29.7 (20.3–46.0)
Guam
17,000
5,000
31.3 (24.0–39.6)
27.0 (19.8–35.8)
Puerto Rico 635,000 340,000 56.0 (52.9–59.0) 58.2 (52.1–64.1)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Respondents with arthritis who answered 7, 8, 9, or 10 to the question “Please think about the past 30 days, keeping in mind all of your joint pain or aching and whether or not you have taken medication. During the past 30 days, how bad was your joint pain on average? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain or aching and 10 is pain or aching as bad as it can be.” Severe joint pain was defined as a pain level of 7–10.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Estimates with a relative standard error ≥30% or unweighted denominator <50 were suppressed as unreliable.

** Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

FIGURE 4.

Map of the United States indicates prevalence of arthritis-attributable severe joint pain among adults aged 18 years and older with arthritis, by state. The data source is the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Age-standardized prevalence of arthritis-attributable severe joint pain* among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis, by state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015

Abbreviations: DC = District of Columbia; NA = not applicable; Q = quartile.

* Respondents with arthritis who answered 7, 8, 9, or 10 to the question “Please think about the past 30 days, keeping in mind all of your joint pain or aching and whether or not you have taken medication. During the past 30 days, how bad was your joint pain on average? Please answer on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain or aching and 10 is pain or aching as bad as it can be.” Severe joint pain was defined as a pain level of 7–10.

Estimate for one state (Alaska) with a relative standard error >30% or unweighted denominator <50 was suppressed as unreliable.

Arthritis Management

In 2015, among adults with arthritis in 13 states that included the BRFSS arthritis management module, the age-standardized median percentage of attendance at a self-management education course was 14.5% (range: 9.1% in New York to 19.0% in Montana) (Table 13). The median age-standardized percentage of health care provider counseling to lose weight if overweight or obese was 44.5% (range: 35.1% in Montana to 53.2% in New York) (Table 14). The age-standardized percentage of health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise did not vary considerably among states (median: 58.5%; range: 52.3%–61.9%) (Table 15).

TABLE 13. Unadjusted* and age-standardized percentages of adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis§ reporting they attended a self-management education course for their arthritis, by selected state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 13 states,** 2015.

State No. of respondents with arthritis Weighted population with arthritis and attendance at self-management education course (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized % (95% CI)
California
2,803
818,000
15.4 (11.5–20.3)
13.6 (9.3–19.6)
Kansas
7,320
53,000
11.2 (9.9–12.7)
11.9 (9.5–14.8)
Kentucky
3,565
110,000
11.5 (9.9–13.3)
12.2 (9.5–15.5)
Michigan
3,224
259,000
12.2 (10.4–14.1)
12.5 (9.3–16.5)
Minnesota
4,666
116,000
14.2 (12.9–15.5)
15.3 (12.7–18.4)
Missouri
2,808
157,000
13.5 (11.7–15.5)
14.5 (11.2–18.7)
Montana
2,123
29,000
14.5 (12.2–17.0)
19.0 (14.4–24.6)
New York
3,921
323,000
10.6 (8.7–12.8)
9.1 (6.9–11.9)
Oregon
1,828
130,000
17.2 (13.8–21.3)
18.1 (12.4–25.5)
Pennsylvania
2,059
294,000
11.9 (10.0–14.1)
15.1 (11.3–20.0)
Rhode Island
2,244
21,000
10.8 (9.1–12.8)
10.6 (7.7–14.4)
South Carolina
4,405
126,000
12.9 (11.4–14.5)
16.5 (13.2–20.4)
Utah
2,929
60,000
16.6 (13.9–19.8)
18.0 (13.5–23.5)
Median (Range)†† 12.9 (10.6–17.2) 14.5 (9.1–19.0)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* The numerator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis who reported ever having taken an educational course or class to learn to manage their arthritis. The denominator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis.

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Respondents who answered yes to the question “Have you ever taken an educational course or class to teach you how to manage problems related to your arthritis or joint symptoms?”

** States that administered the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) arthritis management module: California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Utah.

†† Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 13 states that administered the BRFSS arthritis management module.

TABLE 14. Unadjusted* and age-standardized percentages of overweight or obesity§ among adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis reporting health care provider counseling to lose weight to help with their arthritis or joint symptoms,** by selected state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 13 states,†† 2015.

State No. of respondents with arthritis No. of respondents who are overweight or obese Weighted population with arthritis who are overweight or obese (rounded to 1,000s) Weighted population with arthritis who are overweight or obese reporting counseling to lose weight (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-standardized %* (95% CI)
California
2,803
504
5,719,000
1,762,000
48.9 (41.5–56.4)
40.1 (30.9–50.1)
Kansas
7,320
2,127
536,000
133,000
41.6 (39.0–44.1)
39.9 (35.7–44.3)
Kentucky
3,565
2,289
1,087,000
339,000
48.4 (44.9–52.0)
52.7 (46.6–58.7)
Michigan
3,224
1,375
2,305,000
734,000
48.6 (45.3–52.0)
49.4 (43.5–55.3)
Minnesota
4,666
2,885
907,000
246,000
43.0 (40.7–45.3)
44.3 (39.7–49.0)
Missouri
2,808
1,751
1,372,000
384,000
47.7 (44.4–51.0)
49.8 (43.0–56.6)
Montana
2,123
1,304
216,000
50,000
39.3 (35.6–43.0)
35.1 (28.7–42.1)
New York
39,21
1,112
3,629,000
1,118,000
52.9 (48.7–57.0)
53.2 (45.2–61.1)
Oregon
1,828
528
838,000
245,000
47.8 (42.0–53.7)
47.5 (36.7–58.5)
Pennsylvania
2,059
1,268
2,937,000
801,000
44.6 (41.1–48.2)
42.4 (35.7–49.4)
Rhode Island
2,244
1,271
226,000
64,000
49.9 (46.2–53.6)
41.5 (34.7–48.6)
South Carolina
4,405
2,812
1,105,000
327,000
46.6 (44.0–49.2)
47.6 (42.9–52.4)
Utah
2,929
919
407,000
114,000
45.6 (41.2–50.2)
44.5 (37.6–51.5)
Median (Range)§§ 47.7 (39.3–52.9) 44.5 (35.1–53.2)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* The numerator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis who reported being told by their doctor to exercise or get physical activity. The denominator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis.

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Overweight: body mass index 25.0–29.9; obese: body mass index ≥30; calculated from self-reported height and weight.

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

** Respondents who were overweight or obese who answered yes to the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever suggested losing weight to help your arthritis or joint symptoms?”

†† States that administered the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) arthritis management module: California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Utah.

§§ Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 13 states that administered the BRFSS arthritis management module.

TABLE 15. Unadjusted* and age-standardized percentages of adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis§ reporting health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise, by selected state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 13 states,** 2015.

State No. of respondents with arthritis Weighted population with arthritis reporting counseling for physical activity or exercise (rounded to 1,000s) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age standardized %* (95% CI)
California
2,803
3,022,000
57.0 (50.9–62.9)
57.8 (48.2–66.9)
Kansas
7,320
247,000
52.6 (50.4–54.7)
52.3 (48.4–56.1)
Kentucky
3,565
514,000
53.8 (50.8–56.8)
53.6 (48.3–58.8)
Michigan
3,224
1,242,000
59.0 (56.2–61.7)
61.5 (56.5–66.3)
Minnesota
4,666
462,000
57.1 (55.2–59.0)
58.1 (54.4–61.7)
Missouri
2,808
668,000
57.8 (54.9–60.6)
57.0 (51.1–62.8)
Montana
2,123
112,000
55.5 (52.3–58.6)
57.8 (52.0–63.4)
New York
3,921
1,925,000
63.4 (60.1–66.5)
61.9 (55.1–68.2)
Oregon
1,828
445,000
59.6 (54.6–64.4)
61.7 (52.9–69.9)
Pennsylvania
2,059
1,439,000
58.5 (55.4–61.4)
59.8 (54.0–65.4)
Rhode Island
2,244
115,000
60.9 (57.8–63.8)
59.6 (53.0–65.8)
South Carolina
4,405
586,000
60.4 (58.3–62.6)
61.2 (57.1–65.1)
Utah
2,929
207,000
58.2 (54.4–61.8)
58.5 (52.5–64.3)
Median (Range)†† 58.2 (52.6–63.4) 58.5 (52.3–61.9)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* The numerator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis who report being told by their health care provider to exercise or get physical activity. The denominator was the estimated number of adults with arthritis.

Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

§ Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

Respondents who answered yes to the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever suggested physical activity or exercise to help your arthritis or joint symptoms?”

** States that administered the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) arthritis management module: California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Utah.

†† Median and range were calculated from estimates for the 13 states that administered the BRFSS arthritis management module.

Possible State-Specific Clustering of Health-Related Characteristics

States in the highest quartile of prevalence for adults with arthritis also had the highest percentages of all seven negative health-related characteristics (arthritis-attributable activity limitations, severe joint pain, and social participation restriction; ≥14 physically unhealthy days during the past 30 days; ≥14 mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days; obesity; and leisure-time physical inactivity) and the lowest percentages of leisure-time walking compared with states in the lower quartiles (p-trend <0.006 for all characteristics) when both linear and quadratic tests for trends were conducted (Table 16). States in the highest quartile were Maine, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, and Michigan.

TABLE 16. Estimates of adults aged ≥18 years with arthritis and age-standardized* percentages of arthritis health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis, by quartile§ of state-level prevalence of arthritis — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2015.

Estimate/Characteristic Q1 (17.2%–21.5%)
% (95% CI) Q2 (21.5%–22.7%)
% (95% CI) Q3 (23.0%–25.4%)
% (95% CI) Q4 (25.7%–33.6%)
% (95% CI) p-trend
No. of respondents with arthritis
36,278
43,596
29,347
36,929

Weighted population with arthritis
21,702,000
12,741,000
10,866,000
15,694,000

Arthritis-attributable activity limitations
48.7 (46.7–50.6)
47.8 (46.1–49.5)
49.1 (47.1–51.2)
52.9 (51.3–54.4)
<0.001
Arthritis-attributable severe joint pain
31.3 (29.5–33.2)
26.6 (25.2–28.1)
29.5 (27.7–31.5)
35.4 (33.9–36.8)
<0.001
Arthritis-attributable social participation restriction
20.1 (18.5–21.8)
17.4 (16.2–18.6)
20.5 (18.9–22.1)
23.7 (22.5–25.1)
<0.001
14 physically unhealthy days during past 30 days
27.3 (25.6–29.0)
26.2 (24.7–27.7)
27.0 (25.3–28.8)
30.2 (28.9–31.5)
<0.006
14 mentally unhealthy days during past 30 days
22.6 (21.0–24.3)
22.1 (20.7–23.5)
24.0 (22.2–25.9)
25.7 (24.4–27.1)
0.001
Obesity
37.4 (35.6–39.3)
39.5 (37.8–41.2)
40.3 (38.4–42.4)
45.0 (43.6–46.5)
<0.001
Leisure-time physical inactivity
33.8 (32.0–35.8)
31.4 (29.8–33.0)
35.0 (33.0–37.0)
38.4 (37.0–39.9)
<0.001
Leisure-time walking 48.2 (46.3–50.1) 49.5 (47.8–51.2) 48.0 (46.0–50.1) 45.1 (43.6–46.6) 0.001

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; Q = quartile.

* Age standardized to the 2000 U.S. projected population, using three age groups: 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

Doctor-diagnosed arthritis was defined as a yes response to the question “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you have some form of arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia?”

§ Quartiles (Q1–Q4) were calculated from age-standardized prevalences of arthritis for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Q1 (lowest): Hawaii, California, Minnesota, Texas, the District of Columbia, Nevada, New Jersey, Utah, Alaska, Nebraska, Maryland, New York, Florida, and Illinois. Q2: Virginia, North Dakota, Connecticut, Colorado, South Dakota, Arizona, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Washington, and Kansas. Q3: New Hampshire, Iowa, Idaho, Vermont, Georgia, Montana, Wyoming, Rhode Island, Oregon, Delaware, North Carolina, Ohio, and Indiana. Q4 (highest): Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Louisiana, South Carolina, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Michigan, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, and West Virginia.

p-value for test of linear trend in age-standardized prevalence estimates across quartiles. Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of 0.006 (α = 0.05/8) to adjust for testing multiple characteristics. Quadratic terms were applied to the test of trend to improve fit and were statistically significant at the alpha level of 0.006 for three characteristics (arthritis-attributable severe joint pain, arthritis-attributable social participation restriction, and leisure-time physical inactivity).

Discussion

This is the first report of state-level arthritis prevalence estimates. The large sample size allowed precise estimates for even limited areas and analysis of health-related characteristics and comorbidities. This report also provides model-based county-level arthritis prevalence estimates with high internal validity, which help improve understanding of arthritis disparities at a local level.

In 2015, arthritis affected approximately one in four adults in the United States overall but prevalence, including model-based estimates at the county level, varied substantially by geographic area. The percentage of negative health-related characteristics among adults with arthritis was high in every area, but also varied substantially by geographic area. Arthritis management measures by state indicated both wide variation (e.g., health care provider counseling to lose weight if overweight or obese) and moderate variation (e.g., individual report of ever attending a self-management course and health care provider counseling for exercise or physical activity). Geographic disparities exist across the United States, with arthritis having the greatest impact in southern states (e.g., West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and South Carolina). More detailed estimates for each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Puerto Rico, along with additional analyses not reported here are available on the CDC Arthritis Program website (https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/data_statistics/state-data-list-current.htm).

States with greater prevalences of arthritis also had greater percentages of negative health-related characteristics (i.e., arthritis-attributable activity limitations, arthritis-attributable severe joint pain, and arthritis-attributable social participation restriction; ≥14 physically unhealthy days during the past 30 days; ≥14 mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days; obesity; and physical inactivity) and lesser percentages of leisure-time walking (a recommended management strategy) among adults with arthritis. The reasons for this geographic clustering are unknown but suggest a greater arthritis impact among adults with arthritis who live in those states. Geographic variation in four recognized risk factors for arthritis (i.e., obesity, occupations with high physical workload, smoking, and socioeconomic status) (1317) that are also associated with negative health consequences among adults with arthritis might account for some of the difference. Geographic variations also might exist in access to medical care, including medications, resources for physical activity, and self-management interventions. Furthermore, because those states also have greater prevalence of coronary heart disease and diabetes, two important comorbid conditions for arthritis, health care providers might focus more on treatment and management of those chronic conditions with less emphasis on treatment and management of arthritis (18).

Adults with arthritis have a complex combination of disease characteristics and negative health consequences that can limit their daily activities; reduce health-related quality of life; and contribute to sustained obesity, leisure-time physical inactivity, and lack of participation in leisure-time walking. Participation in self-management education courses among adults with arthritis remains low (19). Only half of patients with arthritis receive counseling on the self-management behaviors of physical activity and weight loss. More counseling might help reduce the proportion with arthritis reporting obesity or leisure-time physical inactivity (approximately two in five adults) (20,21). Greater use of evidence-based interventions for physical activity and self-management education could reduce pain and improve function and quality of life for all adults with arthritis (22,23).

Nationally, approximately one in four adults with arthritis reported severe joint pain in the National Health Interview Survey (4); however, the geographic variations in this report suggest that the prevalence is higher in certain states (four in 10 might experience severe joint pain). Arthritis-attributable severe joint pain can lead to poor physical function. In a cohort of retirees in the United States with arthritis, approximately three in four reported functional limitations and approximately 65% had mobility limitations (24). Poor physical function is a major risk factor linked to falls (25), and adults with arthritis are more than twice as likely to report fall injuries compared with adults without arthritis (26). In addition to decrements in physical function, adults with arthritis consistently report negative effects on health-related quality of life. One study that examined health-related quality of life measures among adults with and without arthritis found that those with arthritis had higher mean numbers of days in the prior month when physical and mental health were not good (27). In this study, approximately one in four adults with arthritis reported ≥14 physically and ≥14 mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days.

Evidence-based interventions (https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/interventions/index.htm) have been reported to have a positive impact on arthritis outcomes (22,23); however, interventions are underused and require more widespread dissemination. Physical activity is a proven strategy for managing arthritis symptoms and many other chronic conditions (22). For instance, a meta-analysis of community-based physical activity interventions indicated that physical activity can decrease pain and improve function by approximately 40% (22). Although persons with arthritis report typical barriers to being physically active (e.g., lack of time and lack of enjoyment), arthritis presents specific barriers (e.g., pain, functional limitations, depression, and fear of falling and injury) (28). Similarly, in a meta-analysis of self-management education interventions, participants experienced improvements of 10%–20% in confidence and skills to manage their condition and reductions in pain, fatigue, and depression (23). However, as this and other analyses illustrate, self-management education interventions are underused by adults with arthritis; nationally, only about 11% report ever having taken a course (19).

Arthritis is a common comorbid condition that might complicate the management of other chronic conditions (e.g., obesity, coronary heart disease, and diabetes), increase the negative outcomes of these conditions, and reduce quality of life (18,29). The combination of arthritis and one of these chronic conditions has been associated with higher levels of physical inactivity (3032). Moreover, arthritis also might hinder the ability of adults with prediabetes to engage in the level of physical activity recommended to prevent diabetes (33). Counseling persons with arthritis that physical activity can improve these outcomes (e.g., lower risk for diabetes) and improving availability of safe and effective physical activity programs in their local communities can be an effective strategy for reducing physical inactivity among these groups (e.g., adults with prediabetes or other comorbid conditions).

CDC funds arthritis programs in 12 state health departments and with national partners (e.g., Young Men’s Christian Association [YMCA] and National Recreation and Park Association) to disseminate evidence-based interventions in their communities (https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/partners/funded-states.htm). State health departments, local community-based organizations, policymakers, and others can use the estimates at the state, territory, and county levels in this report to help identify local areas with need for evidence-based interventions. For example, physical activity programs such as EnhanceFitness, Walk With Ease, and Fit & Strong! (https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/interventions/index.htm) could be disseminated to these areas. Several CDC-funded state health departments have been successful at reaching persons with arthritis with these evidence-based programs by partnering with YMCA of the USA and local parks and recreation departments.

Limitations

The findings in this report are subject to at least seven limitations. First, arthritis was self-reported and not confirmed by a health care professional; however, this case definition has been shown to have sufficient sensitivity for public health surveillance (34). Second, because BRFSS is a cross-sectional survey, a causal relation between risk factors (e.g., obesity) and arthritis cannot be established, although robust evidence exists that links obesity to an increased risk for knee osteoarthritis (the most common form of arthritis) (14). Third, social desirability bias might have a role in certain self-reported characteristics, with underreporting of BMI (35) and overreporting of leisure-time physical activity (36). Fourth, the 2015 BRFSS median response rate was 47.2% and ranged from 33.9% to 61.1%, indicating potential nonresponse bias, although survey weights were applied to address this bias and improve external validity (27). Fifth, some of the morbidities potentially related to arthritis (e.g., physically or mentally unhealthy days) might be primarily affected by other conditions and thus might overestimate arthritis-specific impact. Sixth, the model used for county-level estimates did not account for complex sample design features, including potential geographic correlations between counties or states (i.e., observations for nearby counties and states might be clustered and therefore not independent). Finally, because county representativeness was not captured by BRFSS, model-based estimation other than direct survey estimation was used to generate prevalences at the county level. This approach has limitations that have been described elsewhere (11); however, the method has been tested through a comparison of model-based estimates with direct local survey estimates for certain other chronic conditions at the county level (37).

Conclusion

In 2015, the number of adults with arthritis continued to increase, matched projections of prevalence, and exceeded projections for arthritis-attributable activity limitations at the state level (38). The findings in this report describe the prevalence and health-related characteristics of arthritis across the United States. The findings also highlight geographic variability in these estimates, including gaps in arthritis management. Public health professionals can use this information to better understand and target evidence-based nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as arthritis self-management education and physical activity. These interventions can decrease the impact of arthritis, which in turn might help adults with arthritis better manage comorbid conditions such as obesity, coronary heart disease, and diabetes. These estimates demonstrate the need to create links in clinical and community settings that can enhance health care provider counseling for physical activity and weight loss and facilitate referrals to self-management education and physical activity interventions to address arthritis and related comorbidities.

References

  • 1.Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Brady TJ. Vital signs: prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation—United States, 2013–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:246–53. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6609e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Zhang X, Lu H, Holt JB. Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis at state and county levels—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:489–94. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6519a2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boring MA, Hootman JM, Liu Y, et al. Prevalence of arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation by urban-rural county classification—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:527–32. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6620a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barbour KE, Boring M, Helmick CG, Murphy LB, Qin J. Prevalence of severe joint pain among adults with doctor-diagnosed arthritis—United States, 2002–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:1052–6. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6539a2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hootman JM, Helmick CG, Barbour KE, Theis KA, Boring MA. Updated projected prevalence of self‐reported doctor‐diagnosed arthritis and arthritis‐attributable activity limitation among U.S. adults, 2015–2040. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1582–7. 10.1002/art.39692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murphy LB, Cisternas MG, Pasta DJ, Helmick CG, Yelin EH. Medical expenditures and earnings losses among US adults with arthritis in 2013. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017. 10.1002/acr.23425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gamble S, Mawokomatanda T, Xu F, et al. Surveillance for certain health behaviors and conditions among states and selected local areas—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2013 and 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66(No. SS-16). 10.15585/mmwr.ss6616a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.CDC. Self-reported frequent mental distress among adults—United States, 1993–1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47:326–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bolen J, Schieb L, Hootman JM, et al. Differences in the prevalence and severity of arthritis among racial/ethnic groups in the United States, National Health Interview Survey, 2002, 2003, and 2006. Prev Chronic Dis 2010;7:A64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klein RJ, Schoenborn CA. Age adjustment using the 2000 projected US population. Healthy people statistical notes, no. 20. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang X, Holt JB, Lu H, et al. Multilevel regression and poststratification for small-area estimation of population health outcomes: a case study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am J Epidemiol 2014;179:1025–33. 10.1093/aje/kwu018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Webster BH. Income, earnings, and poverty data from the 2005 American Community Survey. Darby, PA: Diane Publishing; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Di Giuseppe D, Discacciati A, Orsini N, Wolk A. Cigarette smoking and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a dose-response meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R61. 10.1186/ar4498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nevitt MC. Obesity outcomes in disease management: clinical outcomes for osteoarthritis. Obes Res 2002;10(Suppl 1):33S–7S. 10.1038/oby.2002.187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cooper C, McAlindon T, Coggon D, Egger P, Dieppe P. Occupational activity and osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1994;53:90–3. 10.1136/ard.53.2.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murphy LB, Moss S, Do BT, et al. Annual incidence of knee symptoms and four knee osteoarthritis outcomes in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016;68:55–65. 10.1002/acr.22641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moss AS, Murphy LB, Helmick CG, et al. Annual incidence rates of hip symptoms and three hip OA outcomes from a U.S. population-based cohort study: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016;24:1518–27. 10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Theis KA, Brady TJ, Helmick CG. No one dies of old age anymore: a coordinated approach to comorbidities and the rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1–4. 10.1002/acr.23114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murphy LB, Brady TJ, Boring MA, et al. Self‐management education participation among US adults with arthritis: who’s attending? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1322–30. 10.1002/acr.23129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Qin J, Pan L, Hootman JM. Obesity trends among adults with doctor‐diagnosed arthritis 2009–2014. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:376–83. 10.1002/acr.22958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murphy LB, Hootman JM, Boring MA, et al. Leisure time physical activity among U.S. adults with arthritis, 2008–2015. Am J Prev Med 2017;53:345–54. 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Hootman JM, Jones DL. Effects of community-deliverable exercise on pain and physical function in adults with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:79–93. 10.1002/acr.20347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brady TJ, Murphy L, O’Colmain BJ, et al. A meta-analysis of health status, health behaviors, and healthcare utilization outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:120112. 10.5888/pcd10.120112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baker NA, Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Zack MM, Al Snih S. Associations between arthritis and change in physical function in U.S. retirees. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;72:127–33. 10.1093/gerona/glw075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR. Falls and their prevention in elderly people: what does the evidence show? Med Clin North Am 2006;90:807–24. 10.1016/j.mcna.2006.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barbour KE, Stevens JA, Helmick CG, et al. Falls and fall injuries among adults with arthritis—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:379–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Furner SE, Hootman JM, Helmick CG, Bolen J, Zack MM. Health-related quality of life of US adults with arthritis: analysis of data from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2003, 2005, and 2007. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:788–99. 10.1002/acr.20430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brittain DR, Gyurcsik NC, McElroy M, Hillard SA. General and arthritis-specific barriers to moderate physical activity in women with arthritis. Womens Health Issues 2011;21:57–63. 10.1016/j.whi.2010.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qin J, Theis KA, Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Baker NA, Brady TJ. Impact of arthritis and multiple chronic conditions on selected life domains—United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:578–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bolen J, Murphy L, Greenlund K, et al. Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with heart disease—United States, 2005 and 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:165–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.CDC. Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with diabetes—United States, 2005 and 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:486–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.CDC. Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with obesity—United States, 2007 and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:614–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Strauss SM, McCarthy M. Arthritis-related limitations predict insufficient physical activity in adults with prediabetes identified in the NHANES 2011–2014. Diabetes Educ 2017;43:163–70. 10.1177/0145721717691849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sacks JJ, Harrold LR, Helmick CG, Gurwitz JH, Emani S, Yood RA. Validation of a surveillance case definition for arthritis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:340–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stommel M, Schoenborn CA. Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001–2006. BMC Public Health 2009;9:421. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000;71(Suppl 2):1–14. 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang X, Holt JB, Yun S, Lu H, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB. Validation of multilevel regression and poststratification methodology for small area estimation of health indicators from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Am J Epidemiol 2015;182:127–37. 10.1093/aje/kwv002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.CDC. Projected state-specific increases in self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitations—United States, 2005–2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:423–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from MMWR Surveillance Summaries are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES