Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Internet Research logoLink to Journal of Medical Internet Research
letter
. 2018 Mar 5;20(3):e10093. doi: 10.2196/10093

Comment on: Clinical Validity, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators: Systematic Review

Ivan Sisa 1,
Editor: Gunther Eysenbach
PMCID: PMC5859206  PMID: 29506971

I am writing regarding the systematic review about clinical validity, understandability, and actionability of online cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators recently published by Dr Bonner and colleagues [1].

Although Dr Bonner and colleagues used a comprehensive two-step research strategy to identify Web addresses that contained a CVD risk calculator, which led to the identification of 67 Web pages, a very important CVD risk model, the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk assessment model [2], was ignored. Developed by the European Society of Cardiology, this model was derived from 12 European cohort studies (250,000 patients data collected and 3 million person-years of observation) and is based on classical risk factors such as gender, age, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and smoking status. The SCORE risk assessment model should have been included because it satisfies Dr Bonner’s inclusion criteria as it predicts the risk of developing a CVD event and an electronic interactive version of this model is freely available on the European Society of Cardiology's Web page [3].

Furthermore, there are other risk assessment models locally developed in countries such as China, India, and Korea that are not taken into account in this study. Thus, it would have been useful if the authors had added to their research strategy a literature search of review documents focusing on cardiovascular risk assessment as was carried out by Zhao and colleagues [4].

Abbreviations

CVD

cardiovascular disease

SCORE

Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation

Footnotes

Editorial note: Authors were invited to respond but declined. They agree that additional calculators exist that could have been included if a different method was used.

References

  • 1.Bonner Carissa, Fajardo Michael Anthony, Hui Samuel, Stubbs Renee, Trevena Lyndal. Clinical Validity, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 01;20(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8538. http://www.jmir.org/2018/2/e29/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Conroy R M, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald A P, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Ducimetière P, Jousilahti P, Keil U, Njølstad I, Oganov R G, Thomsen T, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Tverdal A, Wedel H, Whincup P, Wilhelmsen L, Graham I M, SCORE project group Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987–1003. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.European Society of Cardiology. [2018-02-10]. SCORE risk charts: the European cardiovascular disease risk assessment model https://www.escardio.org/Education/Practice-Tools/CVD-prevention-toolbox/SCORE-Risk-Charts.
  • 4.Zhao D, Liu J, Xie W, Qi Y. Cardiovascular risk assessment: A global perspective. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:301–311. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Internet Research are provided here courtesy of JMIR Publications Inc.

RESOURCES