Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2012 Oct 8;7(10):10.1371/annotation/ff089043-990a-48c2-a90f-15606c11cc98. doi: 10.1371/annotation/ff089043-990a-48c2-a90f-15606c11cc98

Correction: Comparison of the Predicted Population Coverage of Tuberculosis Vaccine Candidates Ag85B-ESAT-6, Ag85B-TB10.4, and Mtb72f via a Bioinformatics Approach

Jose Davila, Lucy A McNamara, Zhenhua Yang
PMCID: PMC5861738  PMID: 29364965

We found that for Class I epitope prediction data, different HLA–A, −B, and −C alleles account for 51.59% of the variation in epitopes predicted to bind (F = 10.55, p<0.0001) while the specific vaccine or control protein analyzed accounts for 23.52% of the variation (F = 84.16, p<0.0001). For the Class II predictions, different HLA-DRB1 alleles account for 66.55% of the variation in epitopes predicted to bind (F = 37.29, p<0.0001) while the specific vaccine or control protein analyzed accounts for 24.52% of the variation (F = 90.70, p<0.0001).

Footnotes

Competing Interests: No competing interests declared.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES