Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2018 Mar 19;84(7):e02830-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02830-17

Targeting Bacteria and Methanogens To Understand the Role of Residual Slurry as an Inoculant in Stored Liquid Dairy Manure

Jemaneh Habtewold a, Robert Gordon b, Vera Sokolov b, Andrew VanderZaag c, Claudia Wagner-Riddle a, Kari Dunfield a,
Editor: Volker Müllerd
PMCID: PMC5861833  PMID: 29374043

ABSTRACT

Microbial communities in residual slurry left after removal of stored liquid dairy manure have been presumed to increase methane emission during new storage, but these microbes have not been studied. While actual manure storage tanks are filled gradually, pilot- and farm-scale studies on methane emissions from such systems often use a batch approach. In this study, six pilot-scale outdoor storage tanks with (10% and 20%) and without residual slurry were filled (gradually or in batch) with fresh dairy manure, and methane and methanogenic and bacterial communities were studied during 120 days of storage. Regardless of filling type, increased residual slurry levels resulted in higher abundance of methanogens and bacteria after 65 days of storage. However, stronger correlation between methanogen abundance and methane flux was observed in gradually filled tanks. Despite some variations in the diversity of methanogens or bacteria with the presence of residual slurry, core phylotypes were not impacted. In all samples, the phylum Firmicutes predominated (∼57 to 70%) bacteria: >90% were members of Clostridia. Methanocorpusculum dominated (∼57 to 88%) archaeal phylotypes, while Methanosarcina gradually increased with storage time. During peak flux of methane, Methanosarcina was the major player in methane production. The results suggest that increased levels of residual slurry have little impact on the dominant methanogenic or bacterial phylotypes, but large population sizes of these organisms may result in increased methane flux during the initial phases of storage.

IMPORTANCE Methane is the major greenhouse gas emitted from stored liquid dairy manure. Residual slurry left after removal of stored manure from tanks has been implicated in increasing methane emissions in new storages, and well-adapted microbial communities in it are the drivers of the increase. Linking methane flux to the abundance, diversity, and activity of microbial communities in stored slurries with different levels of residual slurry can help to improve the mitigation strategy. Mesoscale and lab-scale studies conducted so far on methane flux from manure storage systems used batch-filled tanks, while the actual condition in many farms involves gradual filling. Hence, this study provides important information toward determining levels of residual slurry that result in significant reduction of well-adapted microbial communities prior to storage, thereby reducing methane emissions from manure storage tanks filled under farm conditions.

KEYWORDS: dairy manure, greenhouse gas, methane, methanogen, residual slurry

INTRODUCTION

Dairy farming is responsible for large amounts of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions, mainly from enteric fermentation and manure management. In large dairy farms, manure is usually stored as slurry for extended periods (i.e., months to 1 year) (1), creating a medium that supports the growth of microbial communities involved in anaerobic degradation and CH4 production (2). During pumping out of slurry tanks for land application, complete removal is difficult in practice, and residual slurries (RS) of various amounts are usually left in storage. In view of the potential CH4 emission mitigation strategies from these systems, the inoculum effects of RS in new storages have become the focus of several studies (38). Different levels of RS left in storage tanks, especially under actual farm conditions where manure is transferred to tanks gradually throughout the storage period, result in varied ratios of RS to fresh manure throughout the storage period. Thus, understanding the effects of these ratios on the dynamics of microbial communities that derive CH4 emission and linking them with CH4 flux during storage are critical to developing effective mitigation strategies. For instance, accelerated starts of CH4 production from liquid dairy manure have been observed after supplementation with 7.6% inoculum material (manure that has been stored for 45 to 60 days at 20°C) (7). About 56 and 97% reductions of CH4 emission have also been demonstrated by complete removal (4) and reduction of RS levels from ∼26% to 13% (5), respectively. Using pilot-scale outdoor storage tanks, ∼56% reduction of cumulative CH4 emission by complete removal of old manure compared to partial emptying was demonstrated (8). Using the same tanks, ∼26% lower cumulative CH4 emission was also reported after reduction of old residual manure from 15% to 5% (6). Interestingly, these decreases in CH4 emissions were presumed to be explained by reductions of well-adapted consortia of microorganisms in the RS that might readily start functioning in new storages, although no study so far has investigated these microbial communities.

With long-term storage of dairy manure, bacterial and methanogenic communities of different sources (e.g., rumen, soil, water, and bedding material) may be enriched and acclimatized to storage conditions (9, 10). All microbial communities functioning in rumen environments may not be able to establish in manure storage systems, as these environments can differ with a number of parameters, such as temperature and substrate composition. Thus, after long-term storage of manure, a consortium of microbial communities that are well adapted to existing storage conditions may readily break down manure organic polymers (polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids), an important step toward CH4 production. To convert complex polymers into CH4, four physiological groups of microorganisms are important: hydrolytic, acidogenic, acetogenic, and methanogenic microbial communities (11, 12). First, hydrolytic bacteria degrade residues of organic polymers into simple compounds such as glucose, fatty acids, amino acids, alcohols, H2, and CO2. As the efficiency of the hydrolysis step determines the rate of anaerobic degradation (13) particularly when the ratio of hydrolytic bacteria to methanogenic archaea is high (14), the relative composition of these bacteria in RS may be critical. By-products of hydrolysis are substrates for acidogenic bacteria that further convert them into different organic acids (e.g., acetic, lactic, propionic, formic, and butyric acids), ethanol, H2, and CO2. Acetogenic bacteria then convert higher organic acids, such as butyric and propionic acids, into acetic acid, H2, and CO2, which are important substrates for methanogenesis (12). As long-term storage of dairy slurry may enrich these hydrolytic, acidogenic, acetogenic, and methanogenic microorganisms, investigating these communities in RS and their effects on CH4 emission in stored manure is an important step toward the refinement and/or development of efficient mitigation strategies.

It is critical to assess the effects of RS on CH4 emission and structure of slurry microbial communities using dairy manure that is stored and managed under conditions similar to farm conditions. Slurry storage systems of dairy farms are usually filled gradually (i.e., daily to weekly loadings) throughout the storage period by transferring barn collections or slurries from temporary storages (1). Compared to batch-filled tanks that have often been used to study CH4 flux from manure storage systems (6, 8), repeated loading in gradually filled tanks may affect the stability of slurry environments and microbial communities. For instance, with repeated loadings, crusts that have been presumed to be the potential locations where aerobic oxidation of CH4 may occur (1518) could be impacted. Although available substrates for microbial communities in batch-filled tanks can be high in the initial phases of storage, gradual filling continually supplies fresh substrates. Thus, the impact of frequency of filling on CH4 flux and microbial communities needs to be assessed.

Advanced molecular methods such as quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and massively parallel sequencing of fragments of universal marker genes, such as 16S rRNA, are revealing the structures of microbial communities from complex environments (19, 20). These techniques have also been successfully used to study functional groups of microorganisms, such as methanogens, by targeting a gene or transcript related to their function (2123). Three different physiological groups of methanogens are known (hydrogenotrophic, aceticlastic, and methylotrophic) and have the gene encoding the alpha subunit of methyl coenzyme A reductase (mcrA), which catalyzes the last step of methanogenesis (24). Since 16S rRNA gene- and mcrA gene-based phylogenies of methanogens are congruent (25), targeting the mcrA genes or transcripts may provide both phylogenetic and functional information about the methanogen community.

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different RS levels (0%, 10%, and 20%) on CH4 emissions and structures of methanogenic and bacterial communities in stored dairy slurries filled gradually and in batch.

RESULTS

Methane flux and manure characteristics.

The absence of RS (0%) had an impact only in gradually filled tanks, where peak flux occurred about 3 weeks later than in the tanks with 10% or 20% RS (Fig. 1). In the absence of RS, the maximum mean daily flux reached was ∼43 to 47% lower than in the tanks with 10% and 20% RS. This resulted in up to 85% reductions of the cumulative emissions compared to those of the tanks with RS. There was little variation in cumulative fluxes (∼11.25 ± 0.53 kg CH4 m−2) from tanks with 10% and 20% RS. In batch-filled tanks, no significant differences in CH4 flux or cumulative emissions (∼9.09 ± 0.23 kg CH4 m−2 of slurry) due to the presence or absence of RS were detected. On the other hand, manure characteristics (e.g., dry matter [DM] and volatile solid [VS] contents, volatile fatty acids [VFAs], and pH) varied with storage time. Dry matter and VS contents of fresh dairy slurries were higher (∼8.7-and 8.4-fold, respectively) than in RS; thus, different levels of RS combined with heterogeneity of the farm manure resulted in varied contents of these parameters in stored slurries on day 1 of storage (Table 1). Regardless of RS levels and filling type, these initial contents were reduced with storage time. On day 65, relatively higher levels of VFAs and hence lower pHs were observed in slurries without RS than in slurries that contained 10% or 20% RS (Tables 1 and 2). Nevertheless, the pHs of slurries from most treatments decreased initially (until day 18) and then increased gradually after, reaching 7.8 ± 0.2 on day 120. Most of the VFAs detected during peak flux of CH4 (day 65) were not detected in day 120 samples, which corresponded to up to a 5.3-fold reduction of CH4 flux.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Mean daily methane (CH4) flux from liquid dairy manure storage tanks containing 0%, 10%, and 20% residual slurry (RS), for gradually filled or batch-filled tanks.

TABLE 1.

Dry matter contents, volatile solid contents, and pHs of stored dairy slurries with 0%, 10%, and 20% residual slurry and filled gradually or in batcha

Sample Dry matter (%)
Volatile solids (%)
pH
Day 1 Day 18 Day 65 Day 87 Day 120 Day 1 Day 18 Day 65 Day 87 Day 120 Day 1 Day 18 Day 65 Day 87 Day 120
FM 20.2 10.4 7.0
RS 2.3 1.2 7.6
0%, GF 19.6 13.8 11.4 7.8 6.3 8.2 6.3 4.9 3.2 2.7 6.9 6.7 7.6 7.5 8.2
10%, GF 9.5 13.2 10.6 7.5 5.7 5.3 6.2 4.3 2.8 2.3 6.9 6.8 8 7.8 7.8
20%, GF 5.8 8.92 10.2 8.0 5.4 3.6 4.8 4.2 3.0 2.0 7.0 7.1 7.8 7.5 7.6
0%, BF 14.1 13 7.1 6.9 6.2 6.7 5.6 3.5 3.0 2.6 6.9 6.7 7.6 7.7 7.7
10%, BF 10.7 17.3 7.0 6.2 6.1 5.7 7.0 3.6 2.6 2.5 7.1 6.7 8 7.7 7.7
20%, BF 11.8 12.6 6.0 7.8 7.9 6.4 6.2 3.0 3.4 3.6 7.1 6.9 7.9 7.7 7.8
a

FM, fresh manure; RS, residual slurry; GF, gradually filled; BF, batch filled.

TABLE 2.

Volatile fatty acid contents of stored dairy slurries with 0%, 10%, and 20% residual slurry and filled gradually or in batch

Sample Volatile fatty acids (g liter−1 of dairy slurry), mean ± SDa
Formic Acetic Propionic Isobutyric Butyric Isovaleric Valeric
Day 65
    0%, GF 0.02 ± 0.01 2.66 ± 1.07 5.32 ± 1.59 4.21 ± 1.08 6.77 ± 2.50 5.36 ± 1.39 1.93 ± 0.62
    10%, GF 0.02 ± 0.00 0.26 ± 0.00 3.01 ± 1.26 0.86 ± 0.12 0.01 ± 0.00 3.20 ± 1.57 0.13 ± 0.03
    20%, GF 0.03 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.12 3.14 ± 0.86 0.44 ± 0.18 0.02 ± 0.00 0.74 ± 0.50 0.14 ± 0.02
    0%, BF 0.03 ± 0.01 2.41 ± 1.09 5.81 ± 0.79 4.15 ± 0.20 5.56 ± 2.0 5.42 ± 0.26 1.80 ± 0.22
    10%, BF 0.02 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.20 4.01 ± 1.14 2.76 ± 0.76 0.37 ± 0.39 4.26 ± 0.97 0.87 ± 0.55
    20%, BF 0.02 ± 0.00 0.33 ± 0.15 1.83 ± 0.55 0.47 ± 0.27 0.01 (B) 0.12 (T) ND
Day 120
    0%, GF 0.02 (T) 0.32 ± 0.14 4.11 ± 2.28 0.27 ± 0.11 ND 0.72 ± 0.79 0.16 ± 0.07
    10%, GF 0.02 ± 0.00 0.10 ± 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND
    20%, GF 0.01 ± 0.00 0.09 ± 0.00 ND ND ND ND ND
    0%, BF ND 0.17 ± 0.02 2.38 ± 0.04 0.09 (T) ND ND ND
    10%, BF 0.02 (T) 0.13 ± 0.10 ND ND ND ND ND
    20%, BF 0.05 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.16 ND ND ND ND ND
a

Values are averages of concentrations obtained from the bottom (∼10 cm from tank floor) and top (5 cm from surface) samples of each tank and time point. A “T” or “B” in parentheses indicates that a value from either the bottom or top of the tank was not detectable (ND).

Abundance and activity of methanogens and bacteria.

There were more (between ∼11 and 458%) copies per gram of dry manure (log10 transformed) of mcrA and bacterial 16S rRNA genes and transcripts in the 1-year-old RS than in fresh dairy slurry used in this study (Fig. 2). During the initial 65 days of storage, these abundance differences resulted in significantly varied (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], P < 0.05) abundances of methanogens and bacteria in stored slurries that received different levels of RS. In samples collected on day 65, the presence of 10% and 20% RS in gradually filled tanks increased the mcrA gene copies between ∼7 and 12% (as calculated from log10-transformed values) above the value for the control (Fig. 2a). Consistently, the activities of methanogens in these slurries, as observed from log10 copies of mcrA transcripts, increased up to ∼12% (Fig. 2a). On day 65, in slurry samples from batch-filled tanks, 10% and 20% RS also resulted in ∼6.5 to 8% increases of mcrA gene copies (log10 transformed) (Fig. 2a). Mean copies (log10 transformed) of mcrA transcripts were also increased between ∼2.5 and 6%. In both gradually filled and batch-filled tanks, most of RS-related increases in the copies of mcrA genes and transcripts were statistically significant (Tukey's post hoc test using log10-transformed values, P < 0.05). However, positive correlations between daily flux of CH4 during the week of day 65 and mcrA gene (r2 = 0.6; P < 0.05) or transcript (r2 = 0.53; P < 0.05) copies were observed only in gradually filled tanks.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Abundance and activity of bacteria (a) and methanogens (b) in fresh manure, old slurry (residual slurry), and stored dairy slurry (day 65 and day 120), as indicated by mcrA/bacterial 16S rRNA gene and transcript copies (log10 transformed). Results shown are means and SEs of duplicate biological samples. Letters shown on the bars for gradually filled tanks indicate significance levels obtained after Tukey's post hoc test using log10-transformed copies; for abundance or activity, different letters indicate statistically significant differences at a P value of <0.05. FM, fresh manure; RS, residual slurry; GF, gradually filled; BF, batch filled.

The day 65 slurry samples collected from batch-filled tanks had more copies (per gram of dry manure) of mcrA genes (∼5 to 10%) and transcripts (∼4 to 9%) than did slurries from gradually filled tanks (Fig. 2a). While these increases were statistically significant (Tukey's test, P < 0.05), they were not reflected in CH4 flux. This is because during the week of day 65, daily mean fluxes of CH4 from gradually filled tanks with RS were ∼23.2% higher than from the corresponding batch-filled tanks. However, in the absence of RS, the gradually filled tank showed the lowest CH4 flux during the week of day 65 (Fig. 1).

Except the tank with 10% RS and filled in batch, RS-related increases in the abundance of bacteria coincided with the changes in methanogen abundance (Fig. 2b). In day 65 samples, slurries with 20% RS of both filling types had more copies (up to 5%), as calculated using log10-transformed copy numbers, of 16S rRNA genes and transcripts (Fig. 2b). On day 120, the abundance and activities of methanogens and bacteria did not show clear trends between RS levels or filling types, indicating little effect of RS in later stages of storage. Thus, qPCR results suggested that increased levels of RS could increase the number methanogen and bacterial populations during the initial phases of storage, which may have increased CH4 flux.

Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities.

After a series of quality inspections and denoising of raw sequences, on average, 35,074 (1,255 unique) and 8,549 (2,056 unique) quality reads per sample were obtained for archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons, respectively. From the RNA samples that were obtained from slurries during peak flux of CH4, 9,841 (688 unique) quality reads per sample of archaeal 16S rRNA transcripts were also retrieved. Prealigned sequence lengths of archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons were 348 to 360 bp and 379 to 405 bp, respectively. The final quality reads of archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons were used to define operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a cutoff of 0.03 and to perform further OTU-based analyses. Two samples with low numbers of amplicon sequences were excluded from OTU-based analysis in archaea. Rarefaction curves (Fig. S2a and S2b), particularly for the archaeal 16S rRNA gene amplicon library, indicated reasonable sampling efforts to capture most of the species in slurry samples. This was consistent with Good's coverage estimates, which indicated sufficient capture of archaeal (>99%) and bacterial (80 to 92%) species from these samples (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

Diversity indices (sobs, Chao1, and inverse Simpson index) calculated for archaeal 16S rRNA amplicon sequences indicated little difference in the diversity of archaea between RS and fresh dairy manure (Table S2). With the presence of 20% RS, the diversities of archaea in slurries from both gradually filled and batch-filled tanks were slightly increased. These diversity differences gradually intensified with storage time, resulting in groupings of slurry samples with and without RS (Fig. 3a). Despite some overlap, the observed separation of slurries with and without RS in the nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots (stress = 0.18; r2 = 0.95) were significant (analysis of molecular variance [AMOVA], P < 0.001). A consistent result (parsimony, P = 0.038) was also observed in a tree that was generated using Yue and Clayton theta distance matrices of archaeal 16S rRNA amplicon sequences (see Fig. S4a). Analysis of shared OTUs (Fig. S3a to d) indicated that RS and fresh manure share more than 50% of their total OTUs. Most (2533) of these shared OTUs were also present in stored slurries from all tanks. These shared OTUs include the most dominant ones in all tanks, which might govern microbial processes in slurries. Thus, RS-related differences in the diversity of archaea might be less important, as the dominant OTUs were consistently present among all slurries.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of the archaeal (a) and bacterial (b) communities in fresh slurry, residual slurry, and stored slurries. Yue and Clayton theta distance matrices of archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons were used to calculate the respective NMDS axis values, which were plotted in R. D65 and D120 represent day 65 and day 120, respectively. The dark green, blue, red, and black colors represented samples from fresh manure, RS, gradually filled tanks, and batch-filled tanks, respectively.

The diversity of bacteria in RS and fresh slurries showed little variation. Unlike archaea, stored slurries with and without RS of both filling types did not show noticeable variation in day 65 or day 120 samples (Table S2). However, when day 65 and day 120 samples are compared, the number of OTUs (sobs and Chao1 estimates) and inverse Simpson diversity indices are shown to be reduced, indicating a gradual reduction of diversity. In NMDS analysis (stress = 0.06; r2 = 0.99), there was significant separation (AMOVA, P < 0.001) of day 65 and day 120 samples (Fig. 3b). The Yue and Clayton theta distance matrix-based tree of slurry samples further confirmed the differences (parsimony, P = 0.002) between day 65 and day 120 samples (Fig. S4b). Even though the diversity of bacteria was reduced with storage time, analysis of shared OTUs among slurry samples indicated little change in proportion of the predominant OTUs (data not shown). Hence, like for archaea, changes in the diversity of bacteria due to the presence of RS or storage time might not be important, as the predominant OTUs, which might govern the microbial processes in slurries, were consistently present in all samples.

Phylogenetic analysis of archaea and bacteria.

Almost all (>99.9%) of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene and transcript reads were phylogenetically assigned to methanogenic archaea, indicating the suitability of stored dairy slurry for these organisms. Twenty-eight archaeal genera were identified from all slurry samples, which were dominated by the genus Methanocorpusculum, accounting for ∼56.6 to 88% of the reads. The genus Methanosarcina also represented a significant proportion of the reads (up to ∼36.7%). Other major methanogenic genera identified in this study were Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccus, Methanoculleus, and several uncultured members, all representing up to 17.5% of the reads in each sample (Fig. 4a). On the other hand, RNA samples obtained during peak flux of CH4 were dominated by the genus Methanosarcina, accounting for ∼57% of the reads (Fig. 4b).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Relative proportions of archaeal genera in fresh, residual (old), and stored dairy slurry samples (day 65 and day 120) (a) and active archaeal genera during peak methane (CH4) flux from each tank (b). Each bar indicates the proportion of archaeal genera in each sample, and the paired bars are for duplicate samples collected from storage tanks. Data outputs from shared OTUs and taxonomic analysis of OTUs were used to generate the graph.

Regardless of RS levels, no significant variations in the relative abundances of major methanogenic genera were observed (Fig. 4a). The genus Methanocorpusculum, which was predominant in all samples, represented ∼8.5% more reads in RS than fresh slurry. However, this difference did not result in noticeable variation in stored slurries of both filling types. On the other hand, Methanosarcina and Methanobrevibacter were relatively abundant in fresh dairy slurry, representing about ∼1.2% and ∼10% more reads, respectively (Fig. 4a). The relative proportion of Methanosarcina, the second most abundant methanogens in stored slurries (∼7 to 28%), varied more with storage time than the presence or absence of RS. Its mean relative abundance increased from ∼14.3% (on day 65) to 36.4% (on day 120) (Fig. 4a). While Methanocorpusculum dominated 16S rRNA gene sequences of all samples, Methanosarcina predominated in the RNA samples obtained during peak flux of CH4 in each tank (Fig. 4b). It represented 42.4 to 57.6% of the reads in day 65 samples of most tanks. In gradually filled tanks without RS, which had peak flux of CH4 on day 87, Methanosarcina represented ∼75.3% of the reads. This indicated a gradual increase of this genus with storage time. The lower relative proportion of Methanosarcina in one of the day 65 samples from a batch-filled tank with 20% RS might be due to the spatial heterogeneity of VFA levels in the tank (Table 2). Thus, in addition to Methanocorpusculum, both DNA and RNA data indicated the importance of methanogens related to the genus Methanosarcina as key players in CH4 production.

A total of 27 phyla were identified from bacterial 16S rRNA amplicon sequences. The phylum Firmicutes predominated in all slurry samples, representing 57 to 70% of the reads (Fig. 5a). While 16 of the 27 phyla represented <0.5% of the reads in each sample, the phyla Bacteroidetes, Synergistetes, Spirochaetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi represented between ∼1 and 15% of the total reads in each sample (Fig. 5a). Romboutsia and Clostridium_XI in day 65 samples and Sedimentibacter and Syntrophomonas in day 120 samples were the predominant genera of the phylum Firmicutes (Fig. 5b). As the relative abundances of different bacterial phyla in fresh and RS were not significantly different (Fig. 5a), the presence of 20% RS did not alter the relative proportions of these phyla in stored slurries of both filling types. During storage, however, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes in all slurries gradually decreased, while Synergistetes showed the reverse.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Relative proportions of bacterial phyla (a) and genera (b) in fresh, residual, and stored dairy slurries. Bars indicate the proportion in each sample, and the paired bars are for duplicate samples collected from each tank. Data outputs from shared OTUs and taxonomic analysis of OTUs were used to make the graph. uncl., unclassified.

Despite the difference in the relative proportions of Sedimentibacter between fresh manure and 1-year-old RS (1.4% and 3.3%, respectively), no significant difference was observed with the presence of RS in either day 65 or day 120 slurry samples (Fig. 5b). However, its relative proportion increased with storage time, reaching ∼20.3% on day 120. Similar trends were observed for Cloacibacillus and Syntrophomonas, where gradual increases (up to ∼11% and 6%, respectively) in relative proportions were observed in day 120 slurries. The relative proportions of the genus Romboutsia in fresh manure and RS were ∼4% and 1%, respectively, which did not result in significant variation in stored slurries of either day 65 or day 120 samples. However, its relative proportion in day 65 slurries (12 to 15.5%) was higher than in day 120 slurries (∼8%) (Fig. 5b). Similarly, the relative proportion of Clostridium cluster XI was higher in fresh manure (∼2.4%) than in RS (∼0.8%) and showed a gradual reduction, from ∼9.5 to 11.6% in day 65 slurries to ∼4.5% in day 120 slurries (Fig. 5b).

DISCUSSION

In dairy farming, which is a source of large amount of non-CO2 greenhouse gases (i.e., CH4 and N2O), liquid manure storage systems have been identified as hot spots for CH4 emission (2). In these storage systems, the inoculum effect of RS in stimulating anaerobic degradation processes and CH4 production has been evident from early studies (26, 27). The authors demonstrated shorter lag phases for CH4 productions from stored animal manure when about 15% old manure is left after emptying storage tanks. In the current study, despite the RS-related increases in the abundances of bacterial and methanogenic communities in day 65 slurries, impacts on CH4 flux were observed only in gradually filled tanks. With gradual filling, a practice that represents the actual manure storage conditions in many dairy farms, the longer lag phase (∼3 weeks) and lower peak flux of CH4 from the 0% RS tank resulted in up to 85% reduction of cumulative emission. With the presence of 10% or 20% RS, increases in CH4 flux and cumulative emission did not vary, indicating that 10% RS might be sufficient to stimulate the start-up of anaerobic degradation and CH4 production. As complete removal of residual manure is often difficult, future studies need to examine the range between 0% RS and 10% RS for levels that have minimal inoculum effect during storage. In other studies, linear increases in CH4 production with the presence of up to 20 to 30% inoculum (digested old manure slurry) in stored liquid dairy manure (6) or food wastewater (28) have been reported; however, the source of inoculum, storage condition, and characteristics of fresh manure may determine the activities of microbial inoculants. In this study, low CH4 production in the tank without RS coincided with low abundance of methanogens and bacteria in day 65 samples.

Gradual filling of tanks means increasing volumes of manure throughout the storage period; thus, considering the surface area-to-volume ratio in the CH4 flux calculation was necessary to assess if the available volume of slurry impacted the observed flux levels. However, CH4 flux per cubic meter of slurry had trends similar to those for the flux calculated using surface area (Fig. S1). The influence of RS-derived microbial abundance on CH4 production can also be realized from the positive correlation that occurred between daily CH4 fluxes during the week of day 65 and RS level-related increases in the abundance (r2 = 0.6; P < 0.05) and activity (r2 = 0.53; P < 0.05) of methanogens.

Unlike in previous batch-based studies (4, 6, 8), in this study, no significant difference in CH4 flux and cumulative emission was observed among batch-filled tanks with and without RS. After complete removal of old manure sludge from batch-filled tanks, ∼97% reduction of fugitive CH4 emissions (4) and ∼56% reduction of cumulative CH4 emissions (8) have been reported. In the current study, what obscured the expected differences in CH4 flux among batch-filled tanks (with and without RS) is not yet clear. Unlike the small difference in CH4 flux from these tanks, there was a positive correlation between RS levels and bacterial or methanogen abundance. However, abundance of these organisms and CH4 flux was poorly correlated during the week of day 65. Thus, with high abundance and activity of bacteria and methanogens at high RS levels, some unknown factors rather than RS might have played a role in reducing CH4 emission from these tanks. Undisturbed crusts that could physically block gaseous emissions and potential methanotrophy (17, 18, 29) are among the factors that might impact CH4 emission from these tanks. In different storage systems, characteristics of crust (e.g., thickness) and methanotrophy may vary with the nature of manure (e.g., total solid level) (30).

Regardless of filling type, the influences of RS on the abundance and activities of bacterial and methanogenic communities were not important after day 120, thus playing a significant role only during the initial phases of storage, when population sizes rather than available substrates may be limiting. Using different sources of inoculum material (wetland sediment, landfill leachate, and mesophilic digestate), a recent study (31) indicated poor correlations between methanogen population size and biochemical methane potential. However, in different storage systems, these correlations may vary with factors that may affect flux, such as the presence of crust and hence potential methanotrophy (17, 18, 29, 3234) and activity of methanogens (e.g., substrate level, pH, and moisture level) (35). Thus, in dairy farms where liquid manure is gradually loaded in open storage tanks or lagoons, reduction or complete removal of RS can lower the number of well-adapted bacteria and methanogens that may serve as inoculants. It is important to note, however, that RS removal should occur as close as possible to the time when high emissions are expected; therefore, late-spring RS removal is recommended and fall RS removal is unlikely to be effective (3).

In all slurry samples, a lower diversity of archaea than of bacteria was observed, a finding in line with previous reports for manure-based mesophilic anaerobic digesters (20, 3638). Differences in the diversity of archaea among all samples were small. As archaeal communities in rumen and manure environments are generally dominated by methanogens (39) and many of them can establish in both environments (12), storage of dairy slurry might not result in significant shifts in the diversity of archaea or methanogens (40). Indeed, an earlier study (41) identified similar methanogenic archaeal communities from fresh diary manure and a mixed inoculum obtained from different biogas reactors, although with a higher abundance in the latter, which is consistent with the current study. The relatively higher diversity of bacteria in RS than in fresh manure was not expected, but the source of RS might have influenced the diversity. Nevertheless, the stability of core communities throughout the storage, as observed from the stability of dominant bacterial OTUs in all samples, could be an indication that diversity differences might not be important. A study (40) also showed little difference in the diversity of bacteria between several-month-adapted inoculum and swine slurry treated with anaerobic digesters and supplemented with the inoculum. Hence, RS might be more important in contributing to the starting number of methanogen and bacterial populations than adding new phylotypes to dairy slurry storage systems.

The dominant bacterial phyla identified in this study (i.e., Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Synergistetes) were typical of anaerobic digester and rumen environments (20, 36, 4245). The dominance of Firmicutes throughout the storage might suggest members of this phylum as key players in the anaerobic degradation of organic substrates in stored dairy manure. Dairy manure contains large amount of lignocellulose biomass (e.g., celluloses, hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin) and some amounts of protein, which are substrates for hydrolytic microorganisms. Thus, these substrates might have supported the hydrolytic members of Firmicutes, such as Clostridium cluster XI and Romboutsia (46), that were dominant in day 65 slurries. While the reduction in the relative proportion of these bacteria in day 120 samples might indicate gradual limitation of available substrates, their by-products (i.e., organic acids) that might have supported acidogenic bacteria, such as Sedimentibacter (47), were predominant in day 65 and day 120 samples.

The predominance of hydrolytic and acidogenic bacteria especially in day 65 and day 120 slurries might suggest accumulation of methanogenic substrates (CO2/H2 and acetate), coinciding with the exclusive dominance (>99.9%) of methanogen-related archaeal OTUs. Although methanogens that are closely related to the genus Methanocorpusculum have rarely been reported from rumen environments (4850), we identified these methanogens as predominant in all samples. The predominance particularly in fresh dairy slurry that was expected to be the main source of these organisms might indicate these methanogens as predominant members of rumen archaea. Moreover, the predominance of these methanogens in RS and stored dairy slurries with 10% and 20% RS might suggest stored liquid dairy manure as suitable habitats for these methanogens. Members of Methanocorpusculum are hydrogenotrophic and have been isolated from anaerobic systems where fermentative by-products such as H2/CO2 or formate may be accumulated (12, 49, 51). Although these substrates are also used by the genus Methanobrevibacter, its relative proportion showed gradual reduction with storage. This might be due to its poor adaptability to storage conditions; this methanogen was commonly reported as dominant in rumen environments (48, 52, 53).

Despite the low abundance of Methanosarcina in fresh slurries and RS, its relative abundance gradually increased with storage time. Moreover, during peak flux of CH4 from each tank, the most active methanogens were members of this genus. This might be explained by its versatile metabolic capability, as it uses a range of substrates, including CO2/H2, acetate, methylated compounds, and methanol (12, 49). Moreover, this methanogen has relatively higher tolerance to different environmental stresses (e.g., high ammonium concentration, high VFA contents, and wider pH range) (54, 55). Particularly, its gradual increase with storage time coincided with the gradual increase in the proportion of Synergistetes that was dominated by the genus Cloacibacillus. This bacterium uses different amino acids (e.g., arginine, lysine, histidine, and serine) and releases direct (acetate, H2, and CO2) and indirect (propionate, butyrate, and valerate) methanogenic substrates (56, 57). Moreover, accumulation of these methanogenic substrates could be contributed by members of Firmicutes, such as Sedimentibacter, an amino acid-utilizing bacterium (47) that increased with storage time. Moreover, higher organic acids, such as propionic acid, could be converted into acetate, formate, H2, and CO2 by acetogenic bacterial communities, such as Syntrophomonas (58), that were relatively abundant in day 120 samples. While acetate was detected in both day 65 and day 120 samples, OTUs related to the genus Methanosaeta (methanogens that can grow solely on acetate) (12, 49) were detected in very low proportions (<0.5%). Methanosaeta has high affinity for acetate (55) but has often been described to be less competitive at high acetate concentrations (31), although a recent study found strong competitiveness of these methanogens in animal wastewater with an elevated acetate level (59).

Conclusion.

On many farms, complete removal of dairy slurry from storage tanks is difficult. Residual slurry may contain large numbers of well-adapted bacterial and methanogenic communities. As a result, the inoculum effect is significant. This study demonstrated the effects of different levels of RS on CH4 emissions and abundance and diversity of methanogenic and bacterial communities. Regardless of filling type (gradual or batch), increased RS levels resulted in higher abundances of methanogens and bacteria in day 65 slurry samples. However, the increased abundances of these populations were significantly correlated with CH4 emissions only in gradually filled tanks, which represent the typical slurry storage practices in many dairy farms. Regardless of RS and slurry filling method, little variation in diversity of bacteria and methanogens was observed among slurry samples. In all samples, Firmicutes and Methanocorpusculum were the predominant bacteria and methanogen, respectively. In addition to its gradual increase with storage, Methanosarcina represented the most active methanogen during peak flux of CH4 from each tank, indicating its significant role in the overall CH4 emitted. Overall, this study revealed the importance of RS in providing newly stored manures with large number of active and well-adapted bacteria and methanogens that may accelerate the start of anaerobic degradation and methanogenesis, and complete removal of RS through alternative pumping systems may provide a low-cost option in reducing CH4 emissions from dairy slurry storage systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental setup and measurement of CH4 flux emissions.

The study was conducted from 2 June to 24 September 2016 (120 days) at Dalhousie University's Bio-Environmental Engineering Center (BEEC) in Truro, NS, Canada (45°45′N, 62°50′W). Six pilot-scale (3.9 m by 1.75 m by 1.8 m) manure storage tanks enclosed by flowthrough steady-state chambers were used. This site has been previously described by Wood et al. (30). The RS was obtained from a previous study conducted at the site and consisted of dairy slurry stored for about 1 year. Dairy slurry (freshly excreted to 2 weeks old) was obtained from a nearby farm that had about 185 dairy animals (lactating and dry cows, calves, and heifers), used washed sand as bedding material, and stored dairy waste (wash water, dung, urine, and bedding material) in a concrete lagoon. Tanks with two levels of RS (10% or 20%) and without any RS were filled with fresh dairy slurry either in batch (on day 1 to 100% volume, 10.6 m3) or gradually with incremental manure additions on day 1 (∼33.3% volume), day 20 (∼33.3% volume), and day 40 (∼33.3% volume). Gas samples were drawn continuously from each tank's outlet, and ambient air and CH4 concentrations were measured at the site using a model TGA 100A tunable diode laser trace gas analyzer (Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT). The CH4 flux (F, g m−2 s−1) was calculated as described previously (30):

F=CoutCinAsQ

where Cout and Cin are the chamber's outlet and inlet CH4 concentrations (g m−3), respectively, As is the surface area of the storage tank (m2), and Q is the airflow rate (m3 s−1) as determined from the wind velocity in each tank's venturi using cup anemometers (Davis Instruments Corp., Hayward, CA). Fluxes were then calculated into daily averages.

Slurry sample collection and analyses.

Prior to storage, 2-g slurry samples were collected in duplicate from fresh and 1-year-old slurries using 15-ml Falcon tubes containing 5 ml of LifeGuard soil preservation solution (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA). During storage, slurry from the top (∼5 cm from surface) and bottom (∼10 cm from tank's floor) sections of each tank was sampled every 15 days for 120 days. From a preliminary test on a few samples, significant shifts in the abundance of methanogenic communities were observed on day 65 (when peak CH4 emissions for most of the tanks were detected); hence, samples from fresh manure, old slurry, and day 65 and day 120 samples were selected for further microbial analysis. On each date, two samplings were made from each tank (top and bottom). During each sampling, nine samples were collected from distinct locations of a tank and homogenized in a clean bucket using a sterile metal rod. Subsamples (2 g each) were then collected in duplicate sterile 15-ml Falcon tubes each containing 5 ml of LifeGuard soil preservation solution. Samples were then transported in coolers to the lab and stored in a −20°C freezer until nucleic acid extraction. Further subsamples of appropriate volume were also collected to analyze pH, dry matter (DM) and volatile solid (VS) contents, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Dry matter and VS contents and pH were determined at the Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture's Laboratory Services (Harlow Institute, Bible Hill, NS, Canada) using standard methods. The VFA analysis was performed by InnoTech Alberta (Edmonton, AB, Canada) via headspace gas chromatography.

Nucleic acid extractions and quantitative real-time PCR.

Slurry samples in LifeGuard soil preservation solution were centrifuged, and pellets were used to coextract total RNA and DNA using RNA PowerSoil total RNA isolation with DNA elution accessory kits (MoBio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) by following the manufacturer's protocol. As the massive research projects (such as Earth Microbiome Project, which aimed to characterize microbial life on this planet) also use nucleic acid extraction kits from MoBio, efficient extractions of nucleic acids were expected when following the optimized and recommended protocol. Duplicate RNA and DNA samples per tank and sampling date were prepared by pooling extractions made from the top and bottom sections of individual samplings. Using triplicate reaction tubes, 8-μl RNA samples were treated with RQ RNase-free DNase (Promega) to remove contaminant DNA and then reverse transcribed into cDNA using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit with RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems) according to the recommended protocols. Before further downstream analyses, both cDNA and DNA samples were diluted and assessed for potential inhibitory effects as described earlier (60). Appropriate dilutions were then selected to conduct quantitative real-time qPCR and amplicon sequencing.

Clear multiplate 96-well PCR plates (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) were used to prepare duplicate reaction mixes from each sample, and qPCR was performed using the CFX96 real-time system on a C1000 Touch thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Methyl coenzyme A reductase (mcrA) genes and transcripts were quantified using primers mlas-mod F and mcrA-rev-mod R (24, 61). Bacterial population size and activities were also estimated by targeting 16S rRNA genes and transcripts using primers Bac 338F and Bac 518R (62). The 20-μl qPCR mix contained 10 μl of Ssofast EvaGreen supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), 1 μl (10 pM) of each primer, 2 μl of template DNA or cDNA (1 to 10 ng μl−1), and 6 μl of PCR-grade water. Thermal cycling for mcrA gene and transcript quantifications involved initial denaturation at 98°C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of dissociation (95°C for 5 s), annealing (57°C for 10 s), and extension (72°C for 15 s) and a final step at 72°C for 30 s before the temperature was increased by 0.5°C from 65°C to 95°C for 5 s to analyze melting curves. For bacterial 16S rRNA gene and transcript quantification, the optimized cycling conditions used were initial denaturation at 98°C for 2 min followed by 34 cycles of dissociation (98°C for 5 s), annealing (55°C for 5 s), and extension (65°C for 5 s), with a final extension 72°C for 3 min before the temperature was increased by 0.5°C from 65°C to 95°C for 5 s. Known copies of plasmid standard curves for mcrA (108 to 101) and bacterial 16S rRNA (109 to 101 copies) gene and transcript quantifications were prepared from Methanosarcina mazei (ATCC 43340) and pure culture of Clostridium thermocellum, respectively. Efficiency, r2, and slope of the plasmid standard curve for the mcrA gene were 93.6% ± 2.8%, 0.99, and −3.4 ± 0.1, whereas for the 16S rRNA gene, these values were 98.0% ± 0.7%, 0.99, and −3.30 ± 0.01, respectively. Cycles of quantification (CQs) for the highest diluted standard point of mcrA (10e1) and no-template controls (NTCs) were 36.1 ± 0.4 and 39.1 ± 1.1, respectively, whereas for the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, these values were 28.1 ± 0.2 and 32 ± 0.0, respectively. CFX Manager software version 3.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) was used to analyze the qPCR data. To determine the effects of RS on the abundance of methanogens and bacteria, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using log-transformed copy numbers of the mcrA and 16S rRNA genes and transcripts in day 65 and day 120 slurries. When statistically significant variation (P < 0.05) was observed among means of gene copies in slurries that received 0%, 10%, and 20% RS, Tukey's post hoc test was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) to determine the sample that resulted in variation.

Amplicon library preparation and sequencing.

Amplicon libraries of archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes were prepared from DNA samples obtained from RS, fresh slurry, and stored slurries (0% and 20%). To identify the key players during peak flux of CH4 from each tank, a library of archaeal 16S rRNA transcripts was also constructed from RNA samples. As CH4 flux from tanks with 10% and 20% RS of both filling types did not show significant variation, only tanks with 0% and 20% RS were used to determine the identities and relative proportions of bacterial and archaeal phylotypes. For bacteria, amplicons were prepared using primers 341F and 805R, which target the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (63), whereas primers Arch349F and Arch806R were used to prepare archaeal 16S rRNA gene and transcript libraries (64). On both archaeal and bacterial primers, Illumina adapter sequences A and B (Table S1) were added to the 5′ ends of the forward and reverse primers, respectively.

For both genes, amplicons for MiSeq sequencing were prepared in two PCR steps with a total of 33 (bacteria) or 37 (archaea) cycles. First, archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified for 25 PCR cycles using the primer sets modified as described above. For each sample, the 25-μl PCR mix contained 5 μl of 5× Phusion HF buffer, 0.25 μl of Thermo Scientific Phusion Hot Start II high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 0.5 μl of 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs; Thermo Scientific), 0.5 μl of each primer (10 μM), 2 μl of diluted DNA (10 to 50 ng/μl) or cDNA, and 16.25 μl of nuclease-free water. Thermal cycling for both gene targets was as follows: initial denaturation at 98°C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles of dissociation at 98°C for 10 s, primer annealing at 55°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension for 5 min. Duplicate PCR tubes were pooled and products were cleaned using silica spin columns (Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up system; Promega) by following the recommended protocol. The second-step PCR was performed for 8 (bacteria) or 12 (archaea) cycles to attach Illumina index tags to the ends of the amplicons that were obtained from the first-step PCR. For each sample, a different combination of index primers 1 (N7xx) and index primers 2 (S5xx) of Illumina's Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) were used to perform PCR. This was performed in a single 50-μl reaction mixture per sample; the same proportion of reagents and thermal cycling conditions similar to those of the first-step PCR were used, except that 4 μl of purified amplicons was used as the template. PCR products were then purified by magnetic beads (Agencourt AmPure XP; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) and resuspended in 25 μl. Purified PCR products were tested for correct amplicon length using gel electrophoresis and submitted to the University of Guelph Advanced Analysis Centre Genomic Facility (Guelph, ON, Canada) for sequencing. Prior to sequencing, libraries were normalized by Sequalprep (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) and library quality was assessed from a random sample of 12 samples using a DNA1000 chip bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Multiplexed sample sequencing was conducted using MiSeq reagent kit version 2 (500 cycles) (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA), producing paired-end reads 250 bp in length. Unprocessed FASTQ files were received for subsequent analysis.

Sequence data analysis.

Raw sequence data for archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes and transcripts were processed and analyzed in mothur version 1.39.5 (65) following the recommended pipeline for MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequences (66), with some modifications. Briefly, after the forward and reverse reads of each sample were merged, target-specific primer sequences were removed and sequences were screened for ambiguity and length. Then sequences were aligned against the Silva gold reference file v128 and further screened for length and homopolymer; overhangs and common gaps were filtered, and sequences were preclustered to further denoise sequencing errors. After removal of potential chimeric sequences, a mothur-formatted version of the RDP's 16S rRNA reference (version 16) was used to classify sequences into phylotypes at a cutoff of 80%, at which undesirable targets that might have been picked by primers were filtered. Finally, purified sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a cutoff of 0.03 (97% similarity), phylotypes of OTUs were identified using the RDP's 16S rRNA reference database, and rarefaction curves were calculated. For OTU-based alpha diversity (e.g., number of OTUs, coverage, Chao1, and inverse Simpson diversity estimate) and beta diversity (e.g., nonmetric multidimensional scaling and shared OTUs) analyses, sequence reads were subsampled and rarefied. Phylogenetic trees generated using the Yue and Clayton theta distance matrices (calculated by relaxed neighbor joining algorithm of Clearcut in mothur) (6668) were used to construct dendrograms showing community structure-based variations between samples, and significance of variations was assessed using AMOVA and parsimony analyses.

Accession number(s).

The unprocessed sequence reads of bacterial 16S rRNA gene, archaeal 16S rRNA gene, and archaeal 16S rRNA transcripts obtained in this study have been deposited in NCBI's Sequence Read Archive as FASTQ files with accession numbers SRR6132422 to SRR6132441, SRR6132442 to SRR6132461, and SRR6132462 to SRR6132469, respectively.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.

We report no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02830-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sheppard S, Bittman S, Swift M, Beaulieu M, Sheppard M. 2011. Ecoregion and farm size differences in dairy feed and manure nitrogen management: a survey. Can J Anim Sci 91:459–473. doi: 10.4141/cjas2010-004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.VanderZaag AC, Wagner-Riddle C, Park KH, Gordon RJ. 2011. Methane emissions from stored liquid dairy manure in a cold climate. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167:581–589. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baldé H, VanderZaag AC, Burtt SD, Gordon RJ, Desjardins RL. 2016. Does fall removal of the dairy manure sludge in a storage tank reduce subsequent methane emissions? J Environ Qual 45:2038–2043. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.03.0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Massé DI, Jarret G, Hassanat F, Benchaar C, Saady NMC. 2016. Effect of increasing levels of corn silage in an alfalfa-based dairy cow diet and of manure management practices on manure fugitive methane emissions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 221:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Massé DI, Masse L, Claveau S, Benchaar C, Thomas O. 2008. Methane emissions from manure storages. Trans ASABE 51:1775–1781. doi: 10.13031/2013.25311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ngwabie NM, Gordon RJ, VanderZaag A, Dunfield K, Sissoko A, Wagner-Riddle C. 2016. The extent of manure removal from storages and its impact on gaseous emissions. J Environ Qual 45:2023–2029. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.01.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sommer SG, Petersen SO, Sørensen P, Poulsen HD, Møller HB. 2007. Methane and carbon dioxide emissions and nitrogen turnover during liquid manure storage. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78:27–36. doi: 10.1007/s10705-006-9072-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wood JD, VanderZaag AC, Wagner-Riddle C, Smith EL, Gordon RJ. 2014. Gas emissions from liquid dairy manure: complete versus partial storage emptying. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 99:95–105. doi: 10.1007/s10705-014-9620-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li J, Zicari SM, Cui Z, Zhang R. 2014. Processing anaerobic sludge for extended storage as anaerobic digester inoculum. Bioresour Technol 166:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Steinmetz RL, Mezzari MP, da Silva ML, Kunz A, do Amaral AC, Tapparo DC, Soares HM. 2016. Enrichment and acclimation of an anaerobic mesophilic microorganism's inoculum for standardization of BMP assays. Bioresour Technol 219:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ali Shah F, Mahmood Q, Maroof Shah M, Pervez A, Ahmad Asad S. 2014. Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis. Sci World J 2014:183752. doi: 10.1155/2014/183752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 12.Liu Y, Whitman WB. 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1125:171–189. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tomei MC, Braguglia CM, Cento G, Mininni G. 2009. Modeling of anaerobic digestion of sludge. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:1003–1051. doi: 10.1080/10643380801977818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma J, Frear C, Wang ZW, Yu L, Zhao Q, Li X, Chen S. 2013. A simple methodology for rate-limiting step determination for anaerobic digestion of complex substrates and effect of microbial community ratio. Bioresour Technol 134:391–395. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ambus P, Petersen SO. 2005. Oxidation of 13C-labeled methane in surface crusts of pig- and cattle slurry. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 41:125–133. doi: 10.1080/10256010500131783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Duan YF, Al-Soud WA, Brejnrod A, Sorensen SJ, Elsgaard L, Petersen SO, Boon N. 2014. Methanotrophs, methanogens and microbial community structure in livestock slurry surface crusts. J Appl Microbiol 117:1066–1078. doi: 10.1111/jam.12584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nielsen DA, Schramm A, Nielsen LP, Revsbech NP. 2013. Seasonal methane oxidation potential in manure crusts. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:407–410. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02278-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petersen SO, Amon B, Gattinger A. 2005. Methane oxidation in slurry storage surface crusts. J Environ Qual 34:455–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.St-Pierre B, Wright AD. 2013. Metagenomic analysis of methanogen populations in three full-scale mesophilic anaerobic manure digesters operated on dairy farms in Vermont, USA. Bioresour Technol 138:277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.St-Pierre B, Wright AD. 2014. Comparative metagenomic analysis of bacterial populations in three full-scale mesophilic anaerobic manure digesters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2709–2717. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5220-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aydin S, Ince B, Ince O. 2015. Application of real-time PCR to determination of combined effect of antibiotics on Bacteria, methanogenic Archaea, Archaea in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Water Res 76:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kraková L, Soltys K, Budis J, Grivalsky T, Duris F, Pangallo D, Szemes T. 2016. Investigation of bacterial and archaeal communities: novel protocols using modern sequencing by Illumina MiSeq and traditional DGGE-cloning. Extremophiles 20:795–808. doi: 10.1007/s00792-016-0855-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilkins D, Lu XY, Shen Z, Chen J, Lee PK. 2015. Pyrosequencing of mcrA and archaeal 16S rRNA genes reveals diversity and substrate preferences of methanogen communities in anaerobic digesters. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:604–613. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02566-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steinberg LM, Regan JM. 2009. mcrA-targeted real-time quantitative PCR method to examine methanogen communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4435–4442. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02858-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luton PE, Wayne JM, Sharp RJ, Riley PW. 2002. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology 148:3521–3530. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-11-3521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zeeman G. 1991. Mesophilic and psychrophilic digestion of liquid manure. PhD thesis Department of Environmental Technology, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zeeman G. 1994. Methane production emission in storages for animal manure. Fertilizer Res 37:207–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00748939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pathak J, Srivastava RK. 2007. Determination of inoculum dose for methane production from food industry effluent. J Ind Pollut Control 23:49–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hansen RR, Nielsen DA, Schramm A, Nielsen LP, Revsbech NP, Hansen MN. 2009. Greenhouse gas microbiology in wet and dry straw crust covering pig slurry. J Environ Qual 38:1311–1319. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wood JD, Gordon RJ, Wagner-Riddle C, Dunfield KE, Madani A. 2012. Relationships between dairy slurry total solids, gas emissions, and surface crusts. J Environ Qual 41:694–704. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Witarsa F, Lansing S, Yarwood S, Gonzalez Mateu M. 2016. Incubation of innovative methanogenic communities to seed anaerobic digesters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:9795–9806. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7875-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aguerre MJ, Wattiaux MA, Powell JM. 2012. Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide during storage of dairy cow manure as affected by dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio and crust formation. J Dairy Sci 95:7409–7416. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Husted S. 1994. Seasonal variation in methane emission from stored slurry and solid manures. J Environ Qual 23:585–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Misselbrook TH, Brookman SKE, Smith KA, Cumby T, Williams AG, McCrory DF. 2005. Crusting of stored dairy slurry to abate ammonia emissions. J Environ Qual 34:411. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0411dup. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim J, Lee SH, Jang I, Jeong S, Kang H. 2015. Can abundance of methanogen be a good indicator for CH4 flux in soil ecosystems? Environ Geochem Health 37:1007–1015. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9729-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sun L, Pope PB, Eijsink VG, Schnurer A. 2015. Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure. Microb Biotechnol 8:815–827. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Town JR, Links MG, Fonstad TA, Dumonceaux TJ. 2014. Molecular characterization of anaerobic digester microbial communities identifies microorganisms that correlate to reactor performance. Bioresour Technol 151:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zakrzewski M, Goesmann A, Jaenicke S, Junemann S, Eikmeyer F, Szczepanowski R, Al-Soud WA, Sorensen S, Puhler A, Schluter A. 2012. Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing. J Biotechnol 158:248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Janssen PH, Kirs M. 2008. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3619–3625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02812-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bouity-Voubou MD, Frigon JC, Guiot S, Brousseau R. 2008. Comparison of treatment efficacy and stability of microbial populations between raw and anaerobically treated liquid pig manure, using PCR-DGGE and 16S sequencing. Can J Microbiol 54:83–90. doi: 10.1139/W07-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Leite AF, Janke L, Harms H, Richnow HH, Nikolausz M. 2016. Lessons learned from the microbial ecology resulting from different inoculation strategies for biogas production from waste products of the bioethanol/sugar industry. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:144. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0548-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abendroth C, Vilanova C, Gunther T, Luschnig O, Porcar M. 2015. Eubacteria and archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants in Germany. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:87. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0271-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jewell KA, McCormick CA, Odt CL, Weimer PJ, Suen G. 2015. Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:4697–4710. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00720-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Snelling TJ, Wallace RJ. 2017. The rumen microbial metaproteome as revealed by SDS-PAGE. BMC Microbiol 17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0917-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhou Z, Fang L, Meng Q, Li S, Chai S, Liu S, Schonewille JT. 2017. Assessment of ruminal bacterial and archaeal community structure in Yak (Bos grunniens). Front Microbiol 8:179. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kuribayashi K, Kobayashi Y, Yokoyama K, Fujii K. 2017. Digested sludge-degrading and hydrogen-producing bacterial floras and their potential for biohydrogen production. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 120:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Imachi H, Sakai S, Kubota T, Miyazaki M, Saito Y, Takai K. 2016. Sedimentibacter acidaminivorans sp. nov., an anaerobic, amino-acid-utilizing bacterium isolated from marine subsurface sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1293–1300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Daquiado AR, Cho KM, Kim TY, Kim SC, Chang HH, Lee YB. 2014. Methanogenic archaea diversity in Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) rumen fluid, rectal dung, and barn floor manure using a culture-independent method based on mcrA gene sequences. Anaerobe 27:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Oren A. 2014. The family Methanocorpusculaceae, p 225–230. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (ed), The prokaryotes: other major lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea. Springer, Berlin, Germany. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38954-2_314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Singh KM, Patel AK, Shah RK, Reddy B, Joshi CG. 2015. Potential functional gene diversity involved in methanogenesis and methanogenic community structure in Indian buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) rumen. J Appl Genet 56:411–426. doi: 10.1007/s13353-015-0270-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhao Y, Boone DR, Mah RA, Boone JE, Xun L. 1989. Isolation and characterization of Methanocorpusculum labreanum sp. nov. from the LaBrea Tar Pits. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:10–13. doi: 10.1099/00207713-39-1-10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Global Rumen Census Collaborators, Janssen PH. 2015. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep 5:14567. doi: 10.1038/srep14567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu C, Zhu ZP, Liu YF, Guo TJ, Dong HM. 2012. Diversity and abundance of the rumen and fecal methanogens in Altay sheep native to Xinjiang and the influence of diversity on methane emissions. Arch Microbiol 194:353–361. doi: 10.1007/s00203-011-0757-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.De Vrieze J, Hennebel T, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2012. Methanosarcina: the rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation. Bioresour Technol 112:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Demirel B, Scherer P. 2008. The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:173–190. doi: 10.1007/s11157-008-9131-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ganesan A, Chaussonnerie S, Tarrade A, Dauga C, Bouchez T, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Sghir A. 2008. Cloacibacillus evryensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel asaccharolytic, mesophilic, amino-acid-degrading bacterium within the phylum ‘Synergistetes’, isolated from an anaerobic sludge digester. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2003–2012. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65645-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Militon C, Hamdi O, Michotey V, Fardeau ML, Ollivier B, Bouallagui H, Hamdi M, Bonin P. 2015. Ecological significance of Synergistetes in the biological treatment of tuna cooking wastewater by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:18230–18238. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4973-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xiao K, Zhou Y, Guo C, Maspolim Y, Ng WJ. 2015. Dynamics of propionic acid degradation in a two-phase anaerobic system. Chemosphere 140:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen S, Cheng H, Liu J, Hazen TC, Huang V, He Q. 2017. Unexpected competitiveness of Methanosaeta populations at elevated acetate concentrations in methanogenic treatment of animal wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:1729–1738. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7967-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Habtewold J, Gordon RJ, Wood JD, Wagner-Riddle C, VanderZaag AC, Dunfield KE. 2017. Dairy manure total solid levels impact CH flux and abundance of methanogenic archaeal communities. J Environ Qual 46:232–236. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.11.0451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Angel R, Claus P, Conrad R. 2012. Methanogenic archaea are globally ubiquitous in aerated soils and become active under wet anoxic conditions. ISME J 6:847–862. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fierer N, Jackson JA, Vilgalys R, Jackson RB. 2005. Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4117–4120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Herlemann DP, Labrenz M, Jurgens K, Bertilsson S, Waniek JJ, Andersson AF. 2011. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J 5:1571–1579. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Takai K, Horikoshi K. 2000. Rapid detection and quantification of members of the archaeal community by quantitative PCR using fluorogenic probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5066–5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.5066-5072.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. 2013. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chao A. 1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sheneman L, Evans J, Foster JA. 2006. Clearcut: a fast implementation of relaxed neighbor joining. Bioinformatics 22:2823–2824. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES