Abstract
Due to the success of immunization and timely surveillance, Canada has not reported any cases of endemic measles since 1998. However, recent large outbreaks of imported-related measles have highlighted the risks of reintroduction of disease through travel and immunization coverage gaps in sub-populations.
Building on its 2011 Elimination Report and in collaboration with provincial and territorial partners, the Public Health Agency of Canada has been promoting immunization, expanding the information gathered in immunization coverage surveys, piloting enhanced surveillance with real-time notifications of suspected and confirmed cases to enable early detection of outbreaks and strengthening its laboratory capacity. As these efforts are consolidated, this approach may become a model for other countries around the world as they seek to achieve measles elimination goals.
Introduction
Canada has been committed to the elimination of endemic measles since its establishment as a national goal at the 1992 Consensus Conference (1). Elimination of measles is achieved when indigenous measles transmission is interrupted for 12 consecutive months or greater (2). With the success of two-dose routine immunization programs and catch-up campaigns, there have been no cases of endemic measles reported since 1998 (3). This significant achievement highlights the collaborative effort undertaken by all levels of government, healthcare providers, non-governmental organizations, expert stakeholders and the Canadian public.
Until global eradication of measles is achieved, imported cases of disease (i.e., exposure which occurs outside Canada) are expected to continue. Since elimination, the number of measles cases has been low with a median annual incidence of 0.87 per 1,000,000 population (Canadian Measles and Rubella Surveillance System [CMRSS] unpublished data). However in recent years, large outbreaks have occurred as a result of importations in communities with inadequate vaccination coverage in Canada and other countries that have achieved elimination status in the World Health Organization (WHO) Region of the Americas (i.e., United States, Brazil) (4).
Acknowledging the challenges of maintaining measles elimination, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) adopted a resolution at the 150th Session of the PAHO Executive Committee for an emergency plan of action urging all Member States to strengthen disease surveillance and vaccination coverage in order to maintain elimination status (5). While Canada has successfully contained past outbreaks, an enhanced effort to sustain measles elimination is required.
In 2011, the Public Health Agency of Canada (the Agency) submitted the Elimination of measles, rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in Canada: Documentation and verification report to PAHO (6). This report presented evidence on measles elimination in Canada and provided recommendations for sustaining elimination status in key areas including: 1) immunization promotion and immunization coverage monitoring; 2) surveillance and outbreak response; and 3) laboratory capacity. The Agency is assessing current activities in each of these focus areas to strengthen Canada’s approach on maintaining elimination.
Immunization promotion and immunization coverage monitoring
Sustaining measles elimination requires at least 95% vaccine coverage for all population cohorts (7). In Canada, current national estimates of childhood measles vaccination indicate adequate coverage with 95% of all children receiving two doses of a measles-containing vaccine by age seven (8). However, immunization coverage at the provincial/territorial/local levels is heterogeneous with sub-populations where vaccination uptake is suboptimal or vaccination is refused. The 2014 BC outbreak (9) and the recent Quebec outbreak in early 2015 (4) are examples of measles imported into a community where vaccinations were refused for religious/philosophical reasons. Those who refuse all vaccines represent only a small part of the continuum of vaccine hesitancy (10). Some parents may delay or be selective in providing all routine vaccinations for their children, resulting in individuals susceptible to infection (10).
The Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy recommends countries have a plan to measure and address vaccine hesitancy as part of their immunization program activities (11). Through the Canadian National Immunization Strategy, an expert Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake Working Group has been formed to address issues of vaccine access and uptake in order to contribute to improving vaccine coverage levels in Canada. The Agency continues to promote immunization through dissemination of educational material for the public and supporting innovative initiatives such as ImmunizeCA, a free mobile vaccine application to help Canadians easily track their immunization records (12).
In the absence of a national network of immunization registries, periodic population-based surveys are necessary to verify adequate national immunization coverage. The Agency monitors national measles immunization coverage through the Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey (cNICS) (8). The sample for the 2013 survey cycle has been expanded to provide estimates at the provincial and territorial levels. The healthcare provider validation phase was completed in 2014 and the survey results are expected to be published later this year. Parental knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding vaccination are also captured in cNICS to better understand the factors influencing immunization decisions.
A national network of immunization registries allows Canada to plan and target immunization efforts, avoid unnecessary duplication of vaccination and facilitate outbreak responses. The Agency continues to support the Canadian Immunization Registry Network and other standard-setting organizations to promote national standards for immunization registries and facilitate the transfer of electronic immunization records between registries. National standards for immunization coverage assessment are published on the Agency website (13). Barcode standards for vaccine products and functional standards for immunization registries will be available in 2015 and by the end of 2016, respectively.
Surveillance and outbreak response
A key component of managing imported cases and ensuring a quick and effective outbreak response is early detection via comprehensive surveillance activities. From 1998 to 2014, there have been 159 identified measles importations from 37 different countries and only 28% of the imported cases resulted in secondary transmission (CMRSS unpublished data). Measles cases are captured primarily by CMRSS through weekly reports from provinces and territories (14).
An Agency pilot project, Measles and Rubella Surveillance (MARS) is a web-based system which provides real-time notifications of suspected and confirmed cases. Since 2011, MARS has been implemented in three jurisdictions (British Columbia, Alberta and Newfoundland). It provides a platform for epidemiological and laboratory data linkage from provincial laboratory, provincial public health unit and national medical laboratory partners. As part of the Agency’s priorities to expand real-time access to public health information, MARS will be offered to other jurisdictions in late 2015.
While measles outbreaks are rare in the post-elimination era, larger outbreaks can be a tremendous burden on public health resources. There is a paucity of data on the costs associated with the control of measles outbreaks in Canada and estimates have been limited. In 2014, an outbreak of four measles cases in Ottawa required the involvement of 60 public health employees who logged 1,400 work hours (15). This created a $28,000 (CDN) deficit in the local public health unit’s first quarter budget (16).
The Agency provides guidance to provinces/territories in supporting investigation and control of outbreaks. In an effort to provide the best available evidence, the Agency collaborated with the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) to conduct a systematic review on interventions to reduce secondary spread of measles (17) and a cost analysis to estimate resource use associated with measles outbreaks (18).
Laboratory capacity
Molecular surveillance and genotyping (the process of determining differences in the genetic make-up of an organism) is essential for understanding measles epidemiology in Canada. It is an invaluable tool for public health investigation for confirming exposure history, determining links between concurrent outbreaks and identifying potential sources of importations (19). Additionally, it allows us to verify Canada’s elimination status by distinguishing between different strain variants and widespread circulation of one strain.
As we move toward global eradication of measles, the genomic diversity of the virus will decrease. As such, it will become increasingly difficult to distinguish multiple importations from endemic transmission when sporadic cases have the same genetic sequence. Extended genotyping will be required more frequently for adequate surveillance.
The Agency’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) is a designated PAHO/WHO measles regional reference laboratory and is responsible for genotyping and enhanced molecular surveillance of all measles specimens in Canada. NML continues to explore innovative methods for enhancing measles virus sequencing to provide timely results in aiding outbreak investigations.
Conclusion
With ongoing measles activity in other regions of the world, Canada’s elimination status will continue to be challenged and will likely result in limited outbreaks, as seen recently in BC (9) and Quebec (4). The threat of importations, combined with suboptimal vaccination coverage in sub-populations, poses a risk of reintroduction of disease. In order for Canada to sustain measles elimination, enhancing current programs and continuing collaboration at all levels of government is required. Building on the recommendations in its 2011 Elimination Report (6), the Agency has been promoting immunization, expanding the information gathered in immunization coverage surveys, piloting enhanced surveillance with real-time notifications of suspected and confirmed cases to enable early detection of outbreaks and strengthening its laboratory capacity. As these efforts are consolidated, this approach may become a model for other countries around the world as they seek to achieve measles elimination.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None
Funding: Po-Po Lam is supported through a science-policy fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
References
- 1.Consensus conference on measles. Can Commun Dis Rep 1993. May;19(10):72–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Papania MJ, Orenstein WA. Defining and assessing measles elimination goals. J Infect Dis 2004. May;189 Suppl 1:S23–6. 10.1086/381556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.King A, Varughese P, De Serres G, Tipples GA, Waters J; Working Group on Measles Elimination. Measles elimination in Canada. J Infect Dis 2004. May;189 Suppl 1:S236–42. 10.1086/378499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pan American Health Organization. World Health Organization [Internet]. Epidemiological alert. Measles outbreaks and implications for the Americas. 9 February 2015. Washington DC; PAHO; 2015. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&Itemid=270&gid=29016&lang=en
- 5.Pan American Health Organization. 150th session of the Executive Committee. Washington DC: Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization; 2012. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=17573&Itemid=
- 6.Public Health Agency of Canada. Elimination of measles, rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in Canada: Documentation and verification report. Ottawa ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015.http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/im/vpd-mev/measles-rougeole-mrer-eng.php
- 7.Pan American Health Organization. Plan of action for the documentation and verification of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome elimination in the Region of the Americas. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization; 2015. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=16739
- 8.Public Health Agency of Canada [Internet]. Vaccine coverage in Canadian children: Results from the 2011 childhood national immunization coverage survey. Ottawa ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/im/nics-enva/vccc-cvec-eng.php
- 9.Naus M, Puddicombe D, Murti M, Fung C, Stam R, Loadman S et al. Outbreak of measles in an unvaccinated population, British Columbia, 2014. Can Commun Dis Rep 2015. Jul;41(7):171–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine 2015. Aug;33(34):4161–4. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eskola J, Duclos P, Schuster M, MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. How to deal with vaccine hesitancy? Vaccine 2015. Aug;33(34):4215–7. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Immunize Canada [Internet]. ImmunizeCA App. Ottawa: Immunize Canada; 2014 http://www.immunize.ca/en/app.aspx
- 13.Public Health Agency of Canada [Internet]. National standards for immunization coverage assessment: Recommendations from the Canadian immunization registry network. Ottawa ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015 http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/im/nationalstandards-normenationales-eng.php [PubMed]
- 14.Government of Canada [Internet]. Surveillance of measles. Ottawa ON: Government of Canada; 2015. http://www.healthycanadians.gc.ca/diseases-conditions-maladies-affections/disease-maladie/measles-rougeole/surveillance-eng.php
- 15.Greenway T. Measles outbreak causes Ottawa public health to run early deficit.Metro News. 2014 May 6. http://metronews.ca/news/ottawa/1024794/measles-outbreak-causes-ottawa-public-health-to-run-early-deficit/
- 16.City of Ottawa. 2014 operating budget Q1 - Board of health for the city of Ottawa health unit status report. Ottawa ON: City of Ottawa; 2015. http://ottawa.ca/calendar/ottawa/citycouncil/obh/2014/05-05/Q1%20Budget%20Report.pdf
- 17.Foerster V, Perras C, Spry C, Weeks L. Public health interventions to reduce the secondary spread of measles. CADTH rapid response report: Systematic review. Ottawa ON: CADTH; May 2015. https://www.cadth.ca/public-health-interventions-reduce-secondary-spread-measles [PubMed]
- 18.Budden A, Lee KM, Lam P. Costs of contact tracing activities aimed at reducing the transmission of measles in Canada. CADTH rapid reponse report: Systematic review. Ottawa ON: CADTH; June 2015. https://www.cadth.ca/costs-contact-tracing-activities-aimed-reducing-transmission-measles-canada [PubMed]
- 19.Heibert J, Severini A. Measles molecular epidemiology: what does it tell us and why is it important? Can Commun Dis Rep 2014;40(12):257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]