Abstract
Posttranslational modification (PTM) of proteins has emerged as a major regulatory mechanism in all three domains of life. One emerging PTM is Nε-lysine acetylation—the acetylation of the epsilon amino group of lysine residues. Nε-lysine acetylation is known to regulate multiple cellular processes. In eukaryotes, it regulates chromatin structure, transcription, metabolism, signal transduction, and the cytoskeleton. Recently, multiple groups have detected Nε-lysine acetylation in diverse bacterial phyla, but no work on protein acetylation in Borrelia burgdorferi has been reported. Here, we describe a step-by-step protocol to identify Nε-lysine acetylated proteins in B. burgdorferi.
Keywords: Borrelia burgdorferi, Posttranslational modification, Protein acetylation, Immunoprecipitation, Acetylated lysine protein
1 Introduction
Posttranslational modifications (PTM) control protein structure, stability, and function. One PTM is Nε-lysine acetylation. In eukaryotes, Nε-lysine acetylation is an abundant PTM that affects thousands of proteins in diverse processes [1–4]. Nε-acetylation is also abundant in bacteria [5–15]. As much as 15–20% of the Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis proteomes are acetylated [8, 11, 12, 15].
There are two mechanisms for Nε-lysine acetylation. The standard mechanism for Nε-acetylation is enzymatic; a lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) transfers the acetyl group from acetyl-coenzyme A to the ε-amino group of a deprotonated lysine. This is the mechanism used by KATs to acetylate lysines in the unstructured N-termini of eukaryotic histones. KATs from diverse bacteria have been identified and some have been characterized [16–22]. A novel non-enzymatic mechanism has been reported in E. coli. In this mechanism, acetyl phosphate (acP) donates its acetyl group directly to the ε-amino group of a deprotonated lysine with no involvement of an enzyme [8, 12]. The result is the same as the enzymatic mechanism, acetylation of the Nε-amino group of a lysine. Non-enzymatic, acP-dependent acetylation is not confined to E. coli; a similar story is unfolding in B. subtilis [15]. Acetyllysines are quite stable; however, they can be enzymatically reversed by lysine deacetylases (KDACs) [23–25].
Here, we describe a step-by-step protocol designed to identify Nε-lysine acetylated proteins from B. burgdorferi using co-immunoprecipitation followed by MS/MS analysis.
2 Materials
BSKII [26]: 9.8 g CMRL-1066, 6 g HEPES, 5 g glucose, 5 g neopeptone, 2.5 g TC yeastolate, 2.2 g NaHCO3, 0.8 g sodium pyruvate, 0.7 g sodium citrate, 0.4 g N-acetyl glucosamine, 50 g BSA. Adjust the pH to 7.5 with 10 M NaOH, and add ddH2O up to 1 l. Add 64 ml heat-inactivated rabbit serum and perform filter sterilization.
RIPA buffer [27]: 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS. Add 1 mM PMSF immediately prior to use.
1× lysis Buffer: 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100. Add 1 mM PMSF immediately prior to use.
Anti-acetylated lysine (AcK) protein antibodies: anti-acetylated lysine protein antibody from Cytoskeleton and Cell signaling are used for immunoprecipitation and Western blot, respectively.
Protein G PLUS agarose: from Santa Cruz.
HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG: from Santa Cruz.
ECL: Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting substrate from Fisher scientific.
2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer: 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 200 mM β-mercaptoethanol.
1× SDS-PAGE gel running buffer: 3.02 g Tris, 14.4 g glycine, 1 g SDS. Add ddH2O up to 1 l.
Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining solution: 0.725 g Coomassie Brilliant Blue, 143 ml methanol, 143 ml acetic acid. Add ddH2O up to 1 l.
Coomassie Brilliant Blue destaining solution: 100 ml methanol, 100 ml acetic acid. Add ddH2O up to 1 l.
1× Transfer buffer: 2.8 g Tris base, 2.9 g glycine, 200 ml methanol. Add ddH2O up to 1 l.
1× PBST (phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20): 8 g NaCl, 0.2 g KCl, 1.44 g Na2HPO4, 0.24 g KH2PO4, 0.5 ml Tween-20. Add ddH2O up to 1 l.
Blocking buffer: PBST containing 10% milk.
Washing buffer: PBST containing 1% milk.
3 Methods
3.1 Growth of B. burgdorferi
Resurrect the spirochetes by inoculating from the stocks at −80 °C into 2 ml BSKII.
Incubate the culture at 37 °C with 5% CO2 until it reaches 1 × 107/ml.
Re-inoculate the spirochetes into 50 ml of BSKII at the concentration of 104/ml and harvest the spirochetes at late log phase.
3.2 Whole Cell Lysate Preparation [28]
Harvest the spirochetes by centrifugation at 4000 × g 4 °C for 30 min.
Wash the spirochetes twice with ice-cold PBS.
Resuspend the spirochetes (~5–7 × 108) in 500 μl RIPA buffer.
Sonicate the cells for 30 s.
Centrifugation at 14,000 × g 4 °C for 15 min.
Save the supernatant.
3.3 Preclear the Cell Lysate [28] (See Note 1)
Add 1 μg normal mouse Ig G to 1.5 mg cell lysates (1 ml).
Incubate the samples at 4 °C for 2 h with rotation.
Add 100 μl protein G agarose beads.
Incubate the samples at 4 °C for 2 h with rotation.
Centrifuge at 500 × g at 4 °C for 5 min.
The supernatant is precleared cell lysate ready for IP.
3.4 Immunoprecipitation [28]
Add 15 μl of mouse anti-AcK monoclonal antibody from Cyto-skeleton (AAC01) to the precleared cell lysates (see Note 2).
Incubate the samples at 4 °C with rotation for at least 4 h or O/N.
Add 50 μl of 50% Protein G agarose beads slurry and incubate at 4 °C for 4 h or O/N with gentle rocking (see Note 3).
Pellet the beads by centrifugation at 4 °C 500 × g for 5 min.
Discard the supernatant.
Wash the beads five times with lysis buffer, each for 10 min.
Resuspend the beads with 50 μl of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
Heat the sample to 95–100 °C for 5 min.
Centrifuge the samples at 500 × g RT for 5 min.
Save the supernatant for SDS-PAGE.
3.5 SDS-PAGE
Load 5 and 20 μl of the supernatant on 15% SDS-PAGE gel for Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and Western blot, respectively.
Run the gel at 15 mA/gel until the bromophenol blue reaches the bottom of the gel.
The gel can be used for either Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining or Western blot.
3.6 Coomassie Brilliant Blue Staining
Soak the gel in Coomassie brilliant blue staining solution for 40 min with gentle shaking.
Transfer the gel into Coomassie Brilliant Blue destaining solution and destain until the background is clear (Fig. 1a).
Cut off the band(s) of interest for the identification of the acetylated protein by MS/MS analysis.
Fig. 1.
Co-immunoprecipitation of acetylated lysine proteins from B. burgdorferi B31A3. (A), Coomassie stained gel. (B), Western blot using anti-acetylated lysine protein antibody. AcK denotes the band corresponding to a major acetylated lysine protein in B. burgdorferi. I input (whole cell lysates); U unbound; IP immunoprecipitation; M protein markers
3.7 Western Blot
After SDS-PAGE, transfer the proteins from the gel(s) to nitrocellulose (NC) membrane(s) at 80 V 4 °C for 2 h.
Soak the membrane(s) in blocking buffer at RT for 1 h or 4 °C overnight with gentle shaking.
Probe the membrane(s) with rabbit anti-acetylated lysine protein antibody from Cell signaling (1:1000) at RT for 1 h.
Wash the membrane(s) three times at RT with washing buffer, each for 5 min.
Probe the membrane(s) with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2000) at RT for another 1 h.
Wash the membrane(s) three times as described above.
Detect the acetylated lysine protein (s) by ECL (Fig. 1b).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (AI4684064 to XFY).
Footnotes
The purpose of the preclearing step is to reduce the amount of nonspecific contaminants in the cell lysate, and to remove proteins with high affinity to Protein G or Protein A-agarose beads prior to immunoprecipitation.
Not all antibodies can be used in immunoprecipitation. One should optimize the effect of immunoprecipitation by testing different antibodies, as well as different incubation conditions (for example, under native or denaturing conditions).
Immobilized Protein A or Protein G is critical to the success of the immunoprecipitation. Protein G PLUS-Agarose is suitable for immunoprecipitation of mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3, rat IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG2c, rabbit or goat polyclonal Abs, and human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4. Protein A-Agarose is suitable for immunoprecipitation of mouse IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgA, rabbit IgG, and human IgG1, IgG2 and IgG4. Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose is suitable for immunoprecipitation of mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3 and IgA, rat IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG2c, rabbit or goat polyclonal Abs, and human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4.
References
- 1.Glozak MA, Seto E. Histone deacetylases and cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26:5420–5432. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rardin MJ, Newman JC, Held JM, Cusack MP, Sorensen DJ, Li B, Schilling B, Mooney SD, Kahn CR, Verdin E, Gibson BW. Label-free quantitative proteomics of the lysine acetylome in mitochondria identifies substrates of SIRT3 in metabolic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:6601–6606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302961110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang XJ, Seto E. Lysine acetylation: codified crosstalk with other posttranslational modifications. Mol Cell. 2008;31:449–461. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Verdin E, Ott M. 50 years of protein acetylation: from gene regulation to epigenetics, metabolism and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:258–264. doi: 10.1038/nrm3931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim D, Yu BJ, Kim JA, Lee YJ, Choi SG, Kang S, Pan JG. The acetylproteome of gram-positive model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Proteomics. 2013;13:1726–1736. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee DW, Kim D, Lee YJ, Kim JA, Choi JY, Kang S, Pan JG. Proteomic analysis of acetylation in thermophilic Geobacillus kaustophilus. Proteomics. 2013;13:2278–2282. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang Q, Zhang Y, Yang C, Xiong H, Lin Y, Yao J, Li H, Xie L, Zhao W, Yao Y, Ning ZB, Zeng R, Xiong Y, Guan KL, Zhao S, Zhao GP. Acetylation of metabolic enzymes coordinates carbon source utilization and metabolic flux. Science. 2010;327:1004–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1179687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weinert BT, Iesmantavicius V, Wagner SA, Scholz C, Gummesson B, Beli P, Nystrom T, Choudhary C. Acetyl-phosphate is a critical determinant of lysine acetylation in E. coli. Mol Cell. 2013;51:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu X, Vellaichamy A, Wang D, Zamdborg L, Kelleher NL, Huber SC, Zhao Y. Differential lysine acetylation profiles of Erwinia amylovora strains revealed by proteomics. J Proteome. 2013;79:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang J, Sprung R, Pei J, Tan X, Kim S, Zhu H, Liu CF, Grishin NV, Zhao Y. Lysine acetylation is a highly abundant and evolutionarily conserved modification in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:215–225. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800187-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang K, Zheng S, Yang JS, Chen Y, Cheng Z. Comprehensive profiling of protein lysine acetylation in Escherichia coli. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:844–851. doi: 10.1021/pr300912q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kuhn ML, Zemaitaitis B, Hu LI, Sahu A, Sorensen D, Minasov G, Lima BP, Scholle M, Mrksich M, Anderson WF, Gibson BW, Schilling B, Wolfe AJ. Structural, kinetic and proteomic characterization of acetyl phosphate-dependent bacterial protein acetylation. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094816. eCollection 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu B, Kim J, Moon J, Ryu S, Pan J. The diversity of lysine-acetylated proteins in Escherichia coli. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18:1529–1536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baeza J, Dowell JA, Smallegan MJ, Fan J, Amador-Noguez D, Khan Z, Denu JM. Stoichiometry of site-specific lysine acetylation in an entire proteome. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:21326–21338. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.581843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kosono S, Tamura M, Suzuki S, Kawamura Y, Yoshida A, Nishiyama M, Yoshida M. Changes in the acetylome and Succinylome of Bacillus subtilis in response to carbon source. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131169. eCollection 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hu LI, Lima BP, Wolfe AJ. Bacterial protein acetylation: the dawning of a new age. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77:15–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07204.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jones JD, O’Connor CD. Protein acetylation in prokaryotes. Proteomics. 2011;11:3012–3022. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim GW, Yang XJ. Comprehensive lysine acetylomes emerging from bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36:211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Soppa J. Protein acetylation in archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes. Archaea. 2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/820681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thao S, Escalante-Semerena JC. Control of protein function by reversible N[epsilon]-lysine acetylation in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:200–204. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hentchel KL, Escalante-Semerena JC. Acylation of biomolecules in prokaryotes: a widespread strategy for the control of biological function and metabolic stress. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:321–346. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bernal V, Castano-Cerezo S, Gallego-Jara J, Ecija-Conesa A, de Diego T, Iborra JL, Canovas M. Regulation of bacterial physiology by lysine acetylation of proteins. New Biotechnol. 2014;31:586–595. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blander G, Guarente L. The SIR2 family of protein deacetylases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:417–435. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hentchel KL, Thao S, Intile PJ, Escalante-Semerena JC. Deciphering the regulatory circuitry that controls reversible lysine acetylation in salmonella enterica. MBio. 2015;6:e00891. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00891-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang XJ, Seto E. The Rpd3/Hda1 family of lysine deacetylases: from bacteria and yeast to mice and men. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:206–218. doi: 10.1038/nrm2346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barbour AG. Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes. Yale J Biol Med. 1984;57:521–525. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ngoka LC. Sample prep for proteomics of breast cancer: proteomics and gene ontology reveal dramatic differences in protein solubilization preferences of radioimmunoprecipitation assay and urea lysis buffers. Proteome Sci. 2008;6:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-6-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang Y, Liu Y, Dong Z, Xu J, Peng H, Liu Z, Zhang JT. Regulation of function by dimerization through the amino-terminal membrane-spanning domain of human ABCC1/MRP1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:8821–8830. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700152200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]