Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2018 Mar 22;86(4):e00762-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00762-17

A Vaginal Tract Signal Detected by the Group B Streptococcus SaeRS System Elicits Transcriptomic Changes and Enhances Murine Colonization

Laura C C Cook a,, Hong Hu b, Mark Maienschein-Cline b, Michael J Federle a
Editor: Nancy E Freitagc
PMCID: PMC5865029  PMID: 29378799

ABSTRACT

Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus [GBS]) can colonize the human vaginal tract, leading to both superficial and serious infections in adults and neonates. To study bacterial colonization of the reproductive tract in a mammalian system, we employed a murine vaginal carriage model. Using transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), the transcriptome of GBS growing in vivo during vaginal carriage was determined. Over one-quarter of the genes in GBS were found to be differentially regulated during in vivo colonization compared to laboratory cultures. A two-component system (TCS) homologous to the staphylococcal virulence regulator SaeRS was identified as being upregulated in vivo. One of the SaeRS targets, pbsP, a proposed GBS vaccine candidate, is shown to be important for colonization of the vaginal tract. A component of vaginal lavage fluid acts as a signal to turn on pbsP expression via SaeRS. These data demonstrate the ability to quantify RNA expression directly from the murine vaginal tract and identify novel genes involved in vaginal colonization by GBS. They also provide more information about the regulation of an important virulence and colonization factor of GBS, pbsP, by the TCS SaeRS.

KEYWORDS: two-component signal transduction, Streptococcus agalactiae, RNA-Seq, vaginal colonization

INTRODUCTION

Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus [GBS]) is an important human pathogen most known for its ability to cause deadly neonatal infections. The primary risk factor to newborns is maternal colonization with GBS in the genitourinary tract (1). In 2010, the CDC revised guidelines to prevent these infections, calling for universal screening of all pregnant women between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation (2). Treatment of GBS in pregnant females involves intrapartum intravenous antibiotics, which has decreased the incidence of neonatal GBS sepsis but has not affected rates of late-onset disease in newborns over 1 week old (3). Maternal intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics have also been shown to have deleterious effects on the intestinal flora of newborns, including a decrease in the frequency of beneficial bifidobacterial species (4). A GBS vaccine has been proposed as a more advantageous strategy to prevent maternal colonization rather than treating infection once it is detected. Development of a GBS vaccine or other anticolonization strategies requires a more thorough understanding of the genetic profiles of GBS during vaginal carriage.

The vaginal environment is made up of a complex and dynamic microbial community. Environmental stressors on GBS colonizing the vaginal tract include changes during the menstrual cycle in pH, the normal colonizing flora, and host innate immune factors, such as interleukin-17 (IL-17) (57). The molecular components necessary for vaginal colonization by GBS have been the subject of study in recent years, with individual adhesins such as serine-rich-repeat proteins and regulators being associated with increased vaginal carriage in murine models (5, 810). Here we determine, for the first time, the full transcriptional profile of GBS strain A909 during murine vaginal colonization compared to laboratory culture conditions. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) studies described here show that numerous global changes occur in bacterial transcription during vaginal colonization, including widespread metabolic shifts, differential expression of numerous transcriptional regulators, and the upregulation of many putative adherence factors. These data will be invaluable for future studies examining GBS colonization factors as well as indicating potential vaccine targets and therapeutics aimed at preventing GBS vaginal colonization in women.

Our findings show that a two-component system (TCS) homologous to the SaeRS virulence-associated TCS in Staphylococcus aureus was highly upregulated in GBS during vaginal colonization. As a canonical TCS in S. aureus, SaeS serves as a sensor histidine kinase, modulating the phosphorylation state of its cognate response regulator, SaeR, in response to environmental signals. Phosphorylated SaeR binds DNA and acts as a direct transcriptional regulator of a wide variety of virulence factors in S. aureus, including alpha-hemolysin and coagulase, among other important exoproteins, and the role of the SaeRS TCS in S. aureus virulence has been demonstrated by numerous studies (1115). Because genes of the S. aureus SaeRS regulon have no apparent homologs in GBS, the role that SaeRS plays in gene regulation and the signal that it senses in GBS is unknown. Here, we identify genes controlled by the SaeRS TCS system during growth in a murine model of vaginal colonization and demonstrate that at least one of these genes is an important factor in GBS colonization or survival in the vaginal tract. Finally, we show that a signal present in vaginal lavage (VL) fluid from mice is sufficient to induce SaeRS-dependent gene expression.

RESULTS

Transcriptomic analysis of GBS during vaginal colonization signals a shift in genetic programming.

The pathogen GBS is most recognized as a vaginal colonizer, so we used RNA-Seq to measure genome-wide mRNA levels during growth in a murine vaginal colonization model and compared them to those occurring during growth under laboratory culturing conditions. GBS cultures grown statically at 37°C in a chemically defined medium (CDM) were compared to bacteria collected from the vaginal tract 48 h following initial inoculation. Approximately one-third of the entire genome of strain A909, 731 genes, were identified as being differentially expressed, with a false-discovery rate (q value) of <0.05, in the vaginal tract compared to genes in log-phase growth in CDM. Of these, 630 were differentially regulated >2-fold (Fig. 1A; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material). Pathway enrichment against KEGG metabolic pathways was performed using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologous (KO) group assignments; metabolic pathways that are differentially expressed during vaginal growth are shown in Fig. 1B.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Transcriptional changes during in vivo growth. (A) Volcano plot of transcriptomic changes in liquid versus mouse. Log2 changes in gene expression were plotted versus the −log10 false discovery rate (FDR). Genes shown in red have an FDR of <0.05 and a fold change of >2. Three genes discussed in the text are labeled with gene numbers. (B) Pathways statistically overrepresented during growth in vivo.

Phosphotransferase systems (PTSs) are almost universally highly upregulated during in vivo colonization (Table 1 and Fig. 1B), with some systems being upregulated >500-fold. PTSs are one important method that bacteria use to sense carbon source availability and transport nutrients into the cell.

TABLE 1.

Gene categories differentially expressed during vaginal colonization

Gene category and no. (strain A909) Gene name Descriptiona Fold change in vaginal colonization
Phosphotransferase systems
    sak_0257 Trehalose-specific IIBCA component −2.700
    sak_0261 Sugar-specific IIC component 5.300
    sak_0354 IIBC component −20.520
    sak_0398 IIA component, lactose/cellobiose family 31.250
    sak_0399 IIB component, lactose/cellobiose family 18.700
    sak_0400 IIC component, lactose/cellobiose family 26.070
    sak_0524 Galactitol-specific IIA component 31.890
    sak_0525 Galactitol-specific IIB component 53.170
    sak_0526 Glucose-specific IIABC component 100.730
    sak_0528 Galactitol-specific IIA component 52.970
    sak_0529 Galactitol-specific IIC component 68.580
    sak_0530 Galactitol-specific IIB component 140.590
    sak_1377 Fructose-specific IIABC component 7.730
    sak_1702 Sucrose-specific IIABC component 8.400
    sak_1759 Fructose-specific, IIC component 5.800
    sak_1825 Galactitol-specific IIC component 23.700
    sak_1833 IIA component 684.810
    sak_1834 IIB component, lactose/cellobiose family 948.230
    sak_1835 Sugar-specific IIC component 88.170
    sak_1893 IIC component 84.130
    sak_1894 IIB component 76.440
    sak_1895 IIA component 65.180
    sak_1908 IID component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 209.060
    sak_1909 IIC component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 123.500
    sak_1910 IIB component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 88.780
    sak_1911 IIA component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 26.670
    sak_1920 Glucose-specific IIABC component 16.460
ABC transporters
    sak_0166 rbsB Ribose ABC transporter, ribose-binding protein 102.631
    sak_0167 rbsC Ribose ABC transporter, permease protein 69.165
    sak_0168 rbsA Ribose ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 61.861
    sak_0169 rbsD Ribose ABC transporter protein RbsD 31.775
    sak_0207 oppD Oligopeptide ABC transporter, permease protein −2.191
    sak_0208 Oligopeptide ABC transporter, permease protein OppC −2.085
    sak_0209 oppD Oligopeptide ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −2.245
    sak_0210 oppF Oligopeptide ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −2.498
    sak_0302 QAT family ABC transporter, permease −2.163
    sak_0303 QAT family ABC transporter, ATP-binding −2.255
    sak_0472 BioY family protein 4.521
    sak_0561 ABC transporter, ATP-binding/permease protein −4.218
    sak_0562 ABC transporter, ATP-binding/permease protein −4.435
    sak_0795 cylA ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein CylA 2.903
    sak_0796 cylB ABC transporter, permease protein CylB 3.487
    sak_0899 Amino acid ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein, putative −5.711
    sak_0900 Amino acid ABC transporter, permease protein, putative −2.611
    sak_0901 ABC transporter, substrate-binding protein −2.416
    sak_1074 ABC transporter, substrate-binding protein −8.399
    sak_1103 Iron chelate uptake ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 3.031
    sak_1104 Iron chelate uptake ABC transporter, permease protein 3.352
    sak_1105 Iron chelate uptake ABC transporter, permease protein 2.848
    sak_1426 fhuD Ferrichrome ABC transporter, ferrichrome-binding protein 3.423
    sak_1427 fhuB Ferrichrome ABC transporter, permease protein 4.479
    sak_1476 Cyclodextrin ABC transporter, permease protein 4.363
    sak_1477 Cyclodextrin ABC transporter, permease protein 4.452
    sak_1538 nikE Nickel ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 38.719
    sak_1539 nikD Nickel ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 44.320
    sak_1540 nikC Nickel ABC transporter, permease protein 68.911
    sak_1541 nikB Nickel ABC transporter, permease protein 78.738
    sak_1542 nikA Nickel ABC transporter, nickel-binding protein 53.693
    sak_1554 mtsC Metal ABC transporter, permease protein 47.051
    sak_1555 mtsB Metal ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 52.891
    sak_1556 mtsA Metal ABC transporter, metal-binding lipoprotein 36.614
    sak_1594 livF HAAT family ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −8.380
    sak_1595 livG HAAT family ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −7.300
    sak_1596 livM HAAT family ABC transporter, permease −10.973
    sak_1597 livH HAAT family ABC transporter, permease −10.450
    sak_1646 HAAT family ABC transporter, permease −2.663
    sak_1647 ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −2.131
    sak_1747 cydC ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein CydC −2.267
    sak_1884 msmK Sugar ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 4.983
    sak_1925 pstA Phosphate ABC transporter, permease protein PstA 18.213
    sak_1927 Phosphate ABC transporter, phosphate-binding protein 10.791
    sak_1966 ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −3.675
    sak_2068 Glycine betaine/carnitine/choline ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein −2.434
    sak_2069 Glycine betaine/carnitine/choline ABC transporter, permease −2.196
Starch and sucrose metabolism
    sak_1472 glgP Glycogen/starch/alpha-glucan phosphorylase 4.686
    sak_0976 glgB 1,4-Alpha-glucan branching enzyme 3.913
    sak_0979 glgA Glycogen synthase 5.437
    sak_1473 malQ 4-Alpha-glucanotransferase 4.785
    sak_0977 glgC Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase 5.077
    sak_0978 glgD Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase, GlgD subunit 5.519
    sak_1703 scrB Sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase 3.684
    sak_1188 Glycosyl hydrolase, family 1 −2.833
    sak_0258 Alpha amylase family protein −2.605
    sak_1155 Phosphoglucomutase/phosphomannomutase family protein 3.877
    sak_0398 PTS system, IIA component, lactose/cellobiose family 31.254
    sak_0399 PTS system, IIB component, lactose/cellobiose family 18.697
    sak_0400 PTS system, IIC component, lactose/cellobiose family 26.073
    sak_1920 PTS system, glucose-specific IIABC component, putative 16.457
    sak_1702 PTS system, sucrose-specific IIABC component 8.405
    sak_0354 PTS system, IIBC component −20.528
    sak_0257 PTS system, trehalose-specific IIBCA component −2.697
Fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism
    sak_0416 fabM Enoyl-CoA hydratase/isomerase family protein −20.503
    sak_0417 fabT MarR transcriptional regulator −11.350
    sak_0418 fabH 3-Oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) synthase III −11.029
    sak_0419 acpP Acyl carrier protein −4.304
    sak_0420 fabK Enoyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase II −19.083
    sak_0421 fabD Malonyl-CoA-acyl carrier protein transacylase −15.727
    sak_0422 fabG 3-Oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase −21.685
    sak_0423 fabF 3-Oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) synthase II −10.549
    sak_0424 accB Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, biotin carboxyl carrier protein −10.054
    sak_0425 fabZ Beta-hydroxyacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) dehydratase fabz −12.538
    sak_0426 accC Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, biotin carboxylase −8.781
    sak_0427 accD Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, carboxyl transferase, beta subunit −10.492
    sak_0428 accA Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, carboxyl transferase, alpha subunit −8.249
Fructose and mannose metabolism
    sak_1036 pfk 6-Phosphofructokinase −2.172
    sak_1888 lacC Tagatose-6-phosphate kinase 102.565
    sak_0537 galT Galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase 30.080
    sak_1703 scrB Sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase 3.680
    sak_1887 lacD Tagatose 1,6-diphosphate aldolase 104.990
    sak_0538 galE UDP-glucose 4-epimerase 13.700
    sak_1889 lacB Galactose-6-phosphate isomerase, LacB subunit 55.168
    sak_1890 lacA Galactose-6-phosphate isomerase, LacA subunit 123.335
    sak_1155 Phosphoglucomutase/phosphomannomutase family protein 3.880
    sak_0524 PTS system, galactitol-specific IIA component, putative 31.886
    sak_0528 PTS system, galactitol-specific IIA component, putative 52.973
    sak_0525 PTS system, galactitol-specific IIB component, putative 53.173
    sak_0530 PTS system, galactitol-specific IIB component, putative 140.593
    sak_0526 PTS system, galactitol-specific IIC component, putative 100.735
    sak_0529 PTS system, galactitol-specific IIC component 68.575
    sak_1825 PTS system, IIC component, putative 23.697
Oxidative phosphorylation
    sak_1750 cydA Cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase, subunit II −3.030
    sak_1749 cydB Cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase, subunit II −2.081
    sak_1036 pfk 6-Phosphofructokinase −2.170
    sak_1378 1-Phosphofructokinase, putative 6.540
    sak_0527 rhaD Rhamnulose-1-phosphate aldolase 83.546
    sak_0594 Phosphoglucomutase/phosphomannomutase family protein 21.790
    sak_0981 atpB ATP synthase F0, A subunit −3.005
    sak_0982 atpF ATP synthase F0, B subunit −2.699
    sak_0980 atpE ATP synthase F0, C subunit −2.417
    sak_0983 atpH ATP synthase F1, delta subunit −2.672
    sak_0985 atpG ATP synthase F1, gamma subunit −2.254
    sak_1377 PTS system, fructose-specific IIABC component 7.730
    sak_1759 PTS system, fructose-specific IIC component 5.800
    sak_1911 PTS system, IIA component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 26.668
    sak_1910 PTS system, IIB component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 88.776
    sak_1909 PTS system, IIC component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 123.500
    sak_1908 PTS system, IID component, mannose/fructose/sorbose family 209.064
    sak_1751 Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family protein −3.130
    sak_0666 fbp Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 3.520
Two-component systems
    sak_0467 saeR DNA-binding response regulator 8.469
    sak_0468 saeS Sensor histidine kinase 6.033
    sak_1880 Sensor histidine kinase, putative 3.625
    sak_1881 Response regulator 4.978
    sak_1917 rgfC Histidine kinase 3.879
    sak_1921 Sensor histidine kinase 2.575
    sak_2061 DNA-binding response regulator −3.831
    sak_2062 Sensor histidine kinase −2.506
    sak_2066 Sensor histidine kinase, putative 53.384
a

HAAT, hydrophobic amino acid uptake; CoA, coenzyme A; QAT, quaternary amine uptake.

The fab operon, which regulates fatty acid biosynthesis, was highly downregulated during vaginal colonization (Table 1 and Fig. 1B). Lowered expression of genes in this operon is thought to increase the amount of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids, which can be protective during growth at a low pH (16, 17). As the human vaginal tract is normally at pH ranges between 3.8 and 4.5, an overall low expression of the fab operon may provide GBS a competitive advantage in the acidic environment.

Differential regulation of two-component systems during growth in vivo.

A recent study defined 21 two-component systems highly conserved in GBS (18). A909 contains 20 of these TCSs, and in our analysis, three complete TCSs were differentially expressed between conditions of lab culturing and host colonization (Table 1), with an additional three histidine kinases being differentially expressed without differential expression of the cognate response regulator. All but one of these differentially expressed TCSs were upregulated during in vivo growth.

One of the most highly upregulated TCSs is SAK_0467/0468. This TCS is homologous to the well-characterized SaeR (48% identical) and SaeS (34% identical) TCSs found in Staphylococcus aureus. In S. aureus, SaeRS regulates numerous virulence factors, such as alpha-hemolysin, lipase protein A, and adhesins, among others (13, 15, 19). The organization of the TCS locus in S. aureus is different from a canonical TCS in that it contains two additional genes (saeP and saeQ) immediately upstream and overlapping with the saeR gene (Fig. 2A). In S. aureus, saeP and saeQ are required to activate SaeS phosphatase activity, allowing the removal of the activating phosphate on SaeR, effectively recycling it and turning off SaeR activity (20). Alignment of the SaeR gene sequences in GBS (Streptococcus agalactiae) and S. aureus is shown in Fig. 2B, with important residues highlighted. In the GBS homologous system, saeP and saeQ are not present, and in their place is a large gene, sak_0466, encoding a putative cell wall surface anchor family protein recently named plasminogen binding surface protein (PbsP). PbsP was shown to be important for both plasminogen binding and dissemination of GBS during invasive disease in a different strain of GBS, NEM316 (21).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

saeRS loci and SaeR protein sequences in Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus. (A) saeRS loci of S. aureus and S. agalactiae, including the surrounding region. (B) SaeR protein sequence alignment between S. agalactiae and S. aureus. Residues marked in yellow were shown to be important for DNA binding, and the residue marked in blue is the predicted phosphorylated aspartic acid residue for the SaeR protein in S. aureus (44).

The genetic pathways controlled by SaeRS are different in S. aureus and in GBS, as the S. aureus regulon, which is well documented, comprises genes that have no homologs in GBS. Because SaeRS is upregulated during vaginal growth and is likely to regulate a distinct set of genes, we examined transcriptomic changes between A909 and an isogenic ΔsaeR strain during log-phase growth in two different laboratory media (chemically defined medium [CDM] and Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with yeast extract [THY]) and during colonization of the vaginal tract.

The SaeR-regulated transcriptome differs greatly between in vitro and in vivo conditions.

Transcriptomic data indicated that SaeRS regulates, either directly or indirectly, a large portion of the genome of GBS under certain conditions. A q value of 0.05 and a cutoff of ≥2-fold change were the criteria that we used to define differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Compared to the wild-type (WT) strain, during log-phase growth, 301 genes were differentially expressed in the ΔsaeR strain in CDM and 466 genes were differentially expressed in THY. Of those that were different in CDM, 136 genes (∼45%) were also changed in THY, though a small number were regulated in opposite directions. The results of these experiments are summarized in Fig. 3A and B, and detailed transcriptomic information can be found in Table S4 in the supplemental material. Although many DEGs were observed in liquid culture, the magnitudes of differences were generally low, with only 6/301 genes in CDM and 29/466 genes in THY showing differences of >10-fold. The clear majority of DEGs were seen to differ only 2- to 5-fold, which may indicate an indirect mechanism of regulation. Despite the large number of genes differentially regulated by SaeRS in liquid culture, only three genes were differentially expressed between the wild-type and the ΔsaeR strains during growth in the vaginal tract (Fig. 3C). In the ΔsaeR mutant, levels of sak_1753 mRNA were more than 800 times lower than for the wild type during vaginal colonization and levels of pbsP transcript were more than 200-fold lower. The third gene differentially regulated between wild-type and ΔsaeR strains was a predicted small open reading frame (ORF), sak_RS00910, which is located between sak_0183 and sak_0184. This ORF encodes a putative peptide of 38 amino acids with no predicted function or homolog. The sak_RS00910 transcript was downregulated a more modest 7.7-fold in the ΔsaeR mutant. Two of these three DEGs, sak_0466 (pbsP) and sak_1753, were among the top 10 most highly upregulated genes seen in the wild type during growth in the vaginal tract compared to lab culture (marked in Fig. 1A). pbsP was upregulated over 250-fold during vaginal colonization compared to growth in CDM, and sak_1753 was the most highly differentially expressed gene, upregulated over 3,000-fold in vivo (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). This evidence indicates that SaeR is responsive to conditions in the vaginal tract and that targets of SaeR regulation could play an important role during growth in vivo.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

The SaeR regulon. (A) Scatter plot shows differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05) between the WT and the isogenic ΔsaeR mutant as the log2-fold change in chemically defined medium (CDM) versus rich medium (THY). (B) Venn diagram showing differentially expressed gene overlap in CDM versus THY. (C) Scatter plot showing gene expression in WT A909 versus the isogenic ΔsaeR mutant. The four genes with an FDR P value of <0.05 are marked in red.

Role of PbsP in vaginal colonization.

PbsP, a documented surface protein containing a sortase-dependent LPXTG motif, was shown to be important in respiratory tract colonization and invasive disease models of infection for GBS and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2123). Considering that we found pbsP transcript levels to be substantially increased during growth of GBS in the vaginal tract, we asked whether removal of the gene would affect its ability to colonize the vaginal tract. We employed a murine model of vaginal carriage to look at colonization levels. In this model, mice are injected with estrogen to synchronize the estrous cycle 1 day prior to vaginal inoculation with bacteria. Colonization is subsequently measured over time as CFU in vaginal washes. We generated an in-frame deletion mutant, ΔpbsP, and compared its ability with that of the wild type to colonize and remain within the murine vaginal tract over the course of several days (Fig. 4). Initial colonization levels 24 h after inoculation were equivalent in WT A909 and the ΔpbsP mutant, but the numbers of viable ΔpbsP bacteria recovered on day 2 postinoculation were significantly decreased compared to the WT, indicating a colonization defect in the ΔpbsP mutant (Fig. 4). By later time points, many mice were no longer colonized and the trending decrease in ΔpbsP mutant colonies was present but no longer significant. Addition of a plasmid containing a copy of PbsP under a constitutive PrecA promoter complemented the colonization defect.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Role of pbsP in vaginal colonization. Colonization levels in CFU/vaginal wash of WT A909 versus the isogenic ΔpbsP mutant on days 1, 2, 3, and 5. Statistical significance was assessed using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test on raw values. *, P < 0.05.

Regulation of pbsP and sak_1753 by SaeRS via a signal present in vaginal lavage fluid.

The signal recognized by SaeS in GBS is not known, but we hypothesized that a component of the vaginal tract, which may comprise a soluble or cell-associated factor not found in laboratory media, may be sensed by SaeS and relayed to SaeR to regulate expression of pbsP and sak_1753. To determine whether such a signal was present in material of the vaginal tract, VL fluids from several mice were collected and pooled. For these experiments, mice were not synchronized for estrus, so lavage fluids from 10 mice were pooled to decrease estrous cycle variability. Wild-type or ΔsaeR cells were then suspended in either VL or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Following a 1-h incubation, transcript levels of pbsP and sak_1753 were assessed by quantitative real-time (RT)-PCR. In WT cells, incubation with VL caused increased transcription of both pbsP and sak_1753, approximately 20- to 30-fold over that of levels seen in PBS, corroborating the initial RNA-Seq results described above (Fig. 5A). In ΔsaeR cells, an increase in transcript amounts for either of these two genes following incubation with VL was not observed (Fig. 5A). These data indicate that the SaeRS system senses a component of VL fluid and this signal promotes upregulation of pbsP and sak_1753 via the response regulator SaeR.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Vaginal lavage fluid induces increased gene expression of pbsP and sak_1753 via SaeR. (A) qPCR transcript levels of the indicated genes following incubation of WT A909 or ΔsaeR mutant cells with vaginal lavage fluid at 37°C for 60 min. (B) Vaginal lavage fluid was treated as indicated with heat, pronase, or filtration prior to incubation with A909. qPCR transcript levels are shown for the indicated genes. All transcript levels were compared to those of a housekeeping gene, gyrA, and are shown as a ratio (to PBS-treated control levels). Student's t test was used to analyzed statistical significance *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005. (C) EMSA gel showing increased shift of the pbsP promoter DNA probed with increased concentrations of SaeR D53E protein. This shift is no longer visible after addition of 10-fold excess unlabeled target DNA but not with 10-fold excess unlabeled random DNA.

To help determine the nature of the signal sensed by SaeRS, vaginal lavage fluid samples were treated by heating at 100°C for 30 min, were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with 1 mg/ml pronase enzyme, or were passed through a 3-kDa filter. Following treatments, VL samples were tested for the ability to upregulate expression of pbsP and sak_1753. Lavage fluid treated with heat or pronase no longer retained signaling ability, but filtrates passing through a 3-kDa molecular mass cutoff remained able to induce increased gene expression, although to a lower level than untreated VL, approximately 4- to 8-fold above levels seen in PBS-treated cells (Fig. 5B). These findings indicated that the signal is likely to comprise a small, heat-labile peptide of <30 residues.

To determine whether SaeR regulation of pbsP was direct, an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed. Because previous studies have demonstrated that SaeR must be phosphorylated in order to bind DNA (24), we attempted to phosphorylate SaeR in vitro using acetyl phosphate. Although we did not observe a shift when using this treatment, we were unable to confirm phosphorylation of SaeR. As it has been shown for several response regulators that replacement of the phosphorylated aspartic acid residue with a glutamate, which provides an extended side chain length, can often result in a constitutively active protein (25), we expressed and purified the SaeR Asp-to-Glu (D53E) variant. Direct binding of the pbsP promoter region was observed via an EMSA (Fig. 5C).

DISCUSSION

To persist on mucosal surfaces such as the vaginal tract, bacteria must have mechanisms to adhere to tissues, evade antimicrobial agents, and adapt to changing environments and nutrients. Identifying these mechanisms would greatly aid the ability to develop treatments that target colonizing pathogens. In the case of GBS, the vaginal environment has been the primary subject of study, as maternal vaginal colonization can result in severe neonatal infections. Although some colonization factors have been described for GBS, an overall picture of the gene profile during in vivo growth is an important missing piece of the puzzle for a full understanding of GBS carriage and infection. Here we present in vivo RNA-Seq data quantifying the transcriptome of GBS during murine vaginal carriage.

The genetic programs governing in vivo growth are shown to be substantially different from what is seen during growth under laboratory conditions, with over one-quarter of the genome showing differential regulation between these two environments. Membrane components such as sensor kinases and nutrient transport systems were generally highly upregulated in the vaginal environment (Fig. 1B). In both rich and chemically defined media, where nutrients are abundant, it may be unnecessary for bacteria to induce expression of PTS systems. In the host, on the other hand, the upregulation of phosphotransferase systems may be essential for survival.

Metabolic systems were also found to be highly differentially expressed. Of particular importance, the fab fatty acid synthesis operon was substantially downregulated during growth in the vaginal tract compared to what was seen under lab culturing conditions. In S. pneumoniae, fatty acid regulation is controlled by the MarR family transcriptional regulator FabT. Deletion of FabT in S. pneumoniae results in upregulation of all fab genes in the fatty acid synthesis operon besides fabM, indicating that FabT acts as a repressor in S. pneumoniae. The authors proposed that in a FabT-deficient mutant strain, upregulation of the fab genes leads to decreased amounts of membrane unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), which results in sensitivity to acid (17). An increase in long-chain fatty acids also results in growth benefits in Streptococcus mutans in acidified environments (16). In the vaginal tract, where sensitivity to acid would be highly detrimental, we found that all genes in the fatty acid synthesis operon, including fabM and fabT, were highly downregulated compared to growth in either CDM or THY, indicating a switch to longer-chain UFA in the vaginal tract than in the laboratory media. Downregulation of the fab operon could lead to increased UFA in the membrane and protect the bacteria from the acidic vaginal environment. The decrease in fabT levels that we observed is surprising if FabT acts as a transcriptional repressor in GBS; however, if FabT is a relatively stable protein, perhaps increased fabT transcription occurs in the cells during initial stages of colonization, prior to the 48-hour sampling time point, leading to an overall transcriptional repression of the entire operon, including fabT.

It is likely that many of the transcriptional differences that we observed in laboratory log-phase growth and in vivo growth are due to changes in the growth state of the organisms. It is possible that the in vivo environment would more closely mimic a stationary-phase growth in liquid culture. The switch from log-phase to stationary-phase growth in bacteria is often characterized by a decrease in expression of ribosomal genes, which in this case have been depleted from our input libraries. A repression in cellular processes associated with cell replication and growth as well as transcription and translation is often observed in the log- to stationary-growth phase shift (26, 27). A previous study by Sitkiewicz and Musser examined gene expression changes in GBS during different growth phases in liquid culture and described a characteristic gene expression profile during stationary phase, including upregulation of particular metabolic genes and stress response genes as well as differential expression of numerous virulence factors (28). We observe similar patterns of gene expression for some of these genes, including high upregulation of the arginine/ornithine carbamoyltransferases (sak_2063-2065 and sak_2123-2125) and the glp operon (sak_0345-0347) during in vivo growth. Conversely, some of the genes found to be differentially expressed in stationary versus log phase in that study are not regulated similarly under our conditions; fba (sak_0178), gap (sak_1790), pgk (sak_1788), and eno (sak_0713), all found to be differentially expressed in stationary-phase liquid culture, are not differentially expressed in vivo compared to what is seen in log-phase growth. Some genes are even regulated in the opposite manner; gbs1539 was found to be upregulated during stationary-phase growth in liquid culture but downregulated in vivo. These data suggest that although the bacterial cells grown in vivo have certain characteristics of stationary-phase growth, it would be an oversimplification to assume that the hallmarks of stationary-phase growth are recapitulated in vivo.

Several TCSs were also found to be differentially regulated during in vivo growth. One such system, highly upregulated in the vaginal tract, was identified as a homolog of the S. aureus virulence regulatory TCS, SaeRS. Despite a high level of sequence homology between the SaeRS proteins of S. aureus and GBS, the S. aureus SaeRS regulon is without homologs in GBS and the known SaeR DNA-binding sequence, GTTAAN6GTTAA (24), was not found at promoter regions of genes observed to be differentially expressed by SaeR in our RNA-Seq data. Alignment of the SaeR sequences of S. aureus and GBS shows that the residues associated with DNA binding in S. aureus (H198, R199, R201, and W218) are conserved, with the exception of residue R199 of S. aureus, thought to be less important for binding, which is an alanine in GBS (Fig. 2A). However, regions of SaeR flanking the DNA binding helices are not similar and may impact the identity of DNA recognition sequences between the orthologs. We have demonstrated that SaeR D53E is able to bind upstream of pbsP. Further work is under way to identify the exact DNA binding site recognized by SaeR in GBS to more easily determine which genes this response regulator directly controls. Although we hypothesize that SaeS acts as the sensor kinase to phosphorylate SaeR, as is the case in S. aureus, we cannot rule out the possibility that SaeR acts promiscuously with other sensor kinases to regulate gene expression.

RNA-Seq analysis was undertaken to identify transcripts whose levels were influenced by SaeRS under different growth conditions, including during growth in the vaginal tract. SaeRS appears to be involved in the regulation of many GBS genes during growth in liquid culture but accounted for a very small and specific genetic program during growth in the vaginal tract. Under this condition, SaeR regulated sak_1753, a hypothetical gene with no known homologs, and a putative small peptide-encoding gene, sak_RS00910, which is located between sak_0183 and sak_0184. Importantly, SaeR also regulated sak_0466 (pbsP), which has been shown to be important for dissemination of GBS during invasive disease, and which we show here to be an important colonization factor for GBS. In liquid culture, the majority of differentially expressed genes were changed by a small degree, generally between 2- and 5-fold, whereas the three DEGs observed during vaginal growth were downregulated 7-fold, >200-fold, and >800-fold. It is possible that the changes seen in liquid culture were the result of indirect rather than direct regulation in the vaginal tract. It is also possible that SaeRS is responsible for a vastly different genetic program depending on environmental signals.

Two of the genes regulated by SaeR during vaginal colonization, sak_1753 and sak_0466 (pbsP), were among the most highly differentially expressed genes in the vaginal tract of WT strains compared to those growing in liquid. The role of sak_1753 in vaginal carriage is currently being examined, although there are very few known homologs and no predicted function for the protein product. PbsP, on the other hand, has recently been identified as a possible GBS vaccine target and was shown to be important in hematogenous dissemination during an intravenous infection. It has also been found to be upregulated during growth in human blood (29) and at 40°C (30). PbsP is highly conserved in GBS strains and present in all sequenced GBS clinical isolates from humans. The role of PbsP in invasive disease was shown in GBS strain NEM316, a clonal complex 23 isolate of capsular serotype III (21). A909, a clonal complex 19 isolate with capsular serotype Ia, was used in these studies, indicating the importance of this gene in multiple strains of GBS in vivo.

In GBS, pbsP is located immediately upstream of saeRS and contains a sortase cell wall-anchoring LPXTG motif, and levels of PbsP protein are decreased in an srtA mutant strain (31). A recent paper examined the role of PbsP in an intravenous model of GBS infection. In this model, PbsP was important for binding of plasminogen, dissemination to organs such as the kidney, and transendothelial migration into the brain (21). In S. pneumoniae, a homologous gene named pneumococcal adherence and virulence factor B, pavB (also termed pfbB) was found to be important for adherence to respiratory epithelial cell lines via fibronectin and plasminogen and for colonization of the nasopharynx (22, 23).

Here we demonstrate that PbsP is also important in maintenance of colonization in the vaginal tract and that its expression levels, controlled by SaeRS, are highly upregulated during incubation with murine vaginal lavage fluid. On day 1 following vaginal inoculation, numbers of A909 and A909ΔpbsP isolates were similar. We hypothesize that during this 24-hour period, bacteria were not necessarily being actively removed from the vaginal tract, and thus the A909ΔpbsP mutants were able to persist in the vaginal environment. Following the day 1 vaginal wash, the bacteria would be required to actively adhere to the tissue to remain in the vaginal tract, emphasizing the defect in colonization by the mutant. Thus, its role does not appear to be limited to invasive disease. In their 2016 article, Buscetta et al. suggest that PbsP plays a role in favoring systemic spread of GBS and invasive infection (21). Because their model begins with intravenous (i.v.) infection rather than mucosal carriage, it is possible that they are observing an unintended side effect of PbsP during systemic infection rather than the primary role as an adhesin on mucosal surfaces. Previous studies have linked the expression of pbsP to the master virulence regulator CovRS, as levels of pbsP transcript and protein are higher in a ΔcovRS strain (21, 32, 33). Direct binding of CovR to the promoter of pbsP was not observed, and it was postulated that the regulation may be indirect (21). It is possible that SaeRS is being regulated by CovRS, although changes in transcript levels of saeRS were not observed in a ΔcovRS mutant (32). Changes in transcript levels of psbP were altered to a much greater extent in a ΔsaeR mutant than in the ΔcovRS mutant, and we postulate that the SaeRS system is more likely to be a direct regulator of psbP than CovRS. Our EMSA data also indicate that phosphomimetic SaeR D53E is a direct regulator of pbsP via promoter binding. Based on these data, we propose that SaeR is phosphorylated by SaeS following interaction with a signal present in the vaginal tract and that phosphor-SaeR directly binds upstream of pbsP to increase gene expression. Alignment of the ∼200 bp upstream of the ATG start site of pbsP and sak_1753 shows a surprisingly high degree of sequence similarity (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Further work will be needed to characterize the exact DNA binding sequence.

Our studies indicate that the signal is likely a small heat-labile peptide of less than 3 kDa. It was shown in S. aureus that subinhibitory concentrations of the human neutrophil peptide (HNP) α-defensins could induce expression of SaeRS-controlled promoters (34). This finding led the authors to hypothesize that host-produced antimicrobial peptides could serve as a signal to activate the SaeRS system. It is possible that α-defensins or a similar small antimicrobial peptide also serves as a signal for SaeRS in S. agalactiae. The extracellular linker region of SaeS (WFNGHMTLT) was found to be important for responding to HNP in S. aureus (35). In S. agalactiae, the linker region has some similarity (GGLNHMLIET), indicating that the signal sensed by these proteins may be similar but not identical. Current studies are focusing on identifying the exact nature of the signal sensed by SaeS in VL and determining whether the signal is related to estrous cycle changes. A model of these data is shown in Fig. 6. Signals encountered in the host environment cause numerous transcriptional changes within the GBS cell. One two-component system, SaeRS, was found to be upregulated during growth in the host. This system senses a host signal during colonization of the vaginal tract and induces expression of sak_1753, a gene encoding an unknown hypothetical protein, and pbsP, encoding a putative adhesin and colonization factor, likely via direct binding. We demonstrate the PbsP is important for vaginal colonization. These data provide important insight into the molecular programming of GBS during growth and colonization in the vaginal tract.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Model of S. agalactiae murine vaginal colonization, illustrating vaginal colonization of GBS, signaling via SaeRS, and host colonization via PbsP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, media, plasmids, and primers.

All strains and plasmids are shown in Table S1, and the primers used in this study are described in Table S2 in the supplemental material. Escherichia coli strain BH10C (36) was cultivated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium or on LB agar. When necessary, antibiotics were included at the following concentrations for E. coli propagation: chloramphenicol (Cm), 10 μg ml−1; kanamycin (Kan), 150 μg ml−1; erythromycin (Erm), 100 μg ml−1. All GBS strains used in this study were derived from the clinical isolate A909 (37). GBS were routinely grown in Todd-Hewitt medium (BD Biosciences) supplemented with 2% (wt/vol) yeast extract (Amresco) (THY) or a chemically defined medium (CDM) modified from that described by van de Rijn and Kessler RE (38, 39). The exact composition of CDM and the protocol for preparation have been previously published (39). Plating was done on THY agar plates or CHROMagar StrepB agar plates (CHROMagar). When necessary, antibiotics were included at the following concentrations for GBS propagation: chloramphenicol (Cm), 3 μg ml−1; kanamycin (Kan), 150 μg ml−1; erythromycin (Erm), 10 μg ml−1; spectinomycin (Spec), 100 μg ml−1; ampicillin (Amp), 50 μg ml−1.

Mouse model of vaginal colonization.

Female outbred CD1 mice aged 7 to 12 weeks were used for all experiments. Experiments were performed as previously described (5, 8, 9). Briefly, 1 day prior to inoculation (day −1), mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 mg β-estradiol valerate (Acros Organics) suspended in 100 μl filter-sterilized sesame oil (Sigma) to synchronize estrus. On day 0, mice were vaginally inoculated with 107 CFU of bacteria in 10 μl PBS. On days 1, 2, 3, and 5, the vaginal lumen was washed with 50 μl sterile PBS, using a pipette to gently circulate the fluid approximately six times. To enumerate the bacteria released from the vaginal lumen, the PBS-based lavage fluid was collected and placed on ice for no more than 30 min before serial dilutions in PBS were plated onto CHROMagar StrepB plates to obtain CFU counts. For enumeration of A909ΔpbsP cells with the complementation vector, cells were also plated on THY Spec plates to ensure retention of the complementing plasmid.

RNA collection.

For RNA collection from the murine host for RNA-Seq, vaginal lavage fluid from mice colonized with bacteria for 48 h was taken directly from the mice and placed into a tube containing 1 ml TRIzol LS reagent (Ambion) and placed on ice. Lavage fluid from a total of 10 mice was placed into the same tube of TRIzol LS reagent, giving a final volume of 1 ml lavage fluid and 1 ml TRIzol LS reagent. These samples were kept on ice for no more than 30 min. Samples were centrifuged for 1 min at 14,000 × g, the TRIzol LS Reagent was removed, and RNA preparation was completed using the Ambion RiboPure Bacteria kit (AM1925; Thermo Fisher). Briefly, 250 μl of RNAWiz was used to resuspend the bacterial pellets. RNA was then purified according to the manufacturer's protocol using 10 min of bead beating using a MiniBeadbeater (BioSpec) set to homogenize to lyse the cells. Following collection, RNA was treated with DNase I for 30 min at 37°C. Vaginal lavage fluid from 10 mice generally gave an average of ∼0.5 to 5 μg of total RNA. For collection of RNA from planktonic cultures, bacteria were grown statically overnight at 37°C in THY broth supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. Following overnight growth, cultures were back diluted 1:50 in freshly prepared CDM broth. Once the cells reached an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) value of 0.3 to 0.6, cultures were spun down at the same OD, and RNA was prepared from bacterial pellets as described above using the RiboPure Bacteria kit and treated with DNase I. For quantitative PCR (qPCR), planktonic cultures were grown as above, back diluted in CDM, and grown to an OD600 value of 0.3 to 0.6. One milliliter of cells at an OD600 of 0.4 was then pelleted and resuspended in either 1 ml of PBS or 1 ml of vaginal lavage fluid. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and then pelleted, and RNA was collected and treated with DNase I as described above.

Preparation of eukaryotic and ribosomally depleted cDNA libraries for RNA-Seq.

Prior to the library creation, RNA samples collected from the murine vaginal tract were depleted of eukaryotic RNA using the MICROBEnrich kit (AM1901; Thermo Fisher). Both vaginal and cultured samples were then taken through the rRNA removal MICROBExpress kit (AM1905; Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA integrity and eukaryotic and rRNA depletion were then assessed by measurement on both a TapeStation 2200 (Agilent) and a Qubit RNA high-sensitivity fluorometer (MBL) by the DNA Services Facility (DNAS) at the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Genomic Research. If a high concentration of rRNA was still detected, samples were taken through the MICROBExpress kit an additional time.

RNA-Seq libraries were generated from a small amount of RNA (10 to 400 ng) using the KAPA Stranded RNA-Seq Library Preparation kit for Illumina Platforms (KR0934; KAPABiosystems). Briefly, 10 to 400 ng of rRNA-depleted RNA was fragmented by heating fragmentation buffer at 94°C for 6 min. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using random primers followed by 2nd-strand synthesis and marking. A poly(A) tail was then added to double-stranded cDNA (dscDNA) fragments, and Illumina adapters were ligated onto the library fragments. The library was then subjected to two rounds of cleanup using magnetic beads for DNA purification (P920-30; 101Bio) followed by library amplification for 10 cycles and an additional magnetic-bead cleanup step. All libraries were then sent to the DNAS facility for quality control (QC) and quantification on the Tapestation 2200 instrument (Agilent). At least 20 μl of 50 nM libraries was sent to the University of Chicago Genomics Facility for sequencing and analysis.

RNA sequencing and analysis.

Raw sequencing data were analyzed by the University of Illinois at Chicago Research Resources Center. Data were aligned to the GBS A909 genome using BWA MEM (40), and gene expression was quantified using featureCounts (41). Gene expression was normalized to counts per million sequences, and differential expression analysis was performed on raw counts using edgeR (42), and the false-discovery rate (FDR) correction was used to adjust P values for multiple testing. Significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with FDR of <0.05 were selected for pathway analysis. The KEGG gene and pathway annotations for A909 (T number T00278) were downloaded from the KEGG website (http://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/www_bget?gn:T00278), and all genes were assigned to their KEGG Orthology (KO) group. All metabolic pathways associated with any KO in the A909 genome were downloaded, and a list of all KOs in each pathway was created to serve as a pathway database. Enrichment statistics for each pathway were computed with respect to our differentially expressed genes by comparing the fraction of KOs in a pathway that were DEGs to the overall fraction of DEGs. We computed P values using Fisher's exact test and corrected for multiple testing with the FDR correction over all pathways.

Construction of saeR and pbsP mutants and pLC010 complementation plasmid.

For generation of a plasmid to replace saeR with aphA3 (kanamycin resistance gene), upstream and downstream DNA fragments flanking the saeR gene were amplified by PCR using primer pairs LC112/LC115 and LC113/LC116, respectively. These products were purified and then fused in a second PCR using the outside primers LC112/LC116. This fusion product was cloned into a temperature-sensitive pJC159 (Cmr) vector using internal enzymes HindIII and ClaI following by ligation. Using inverse PCR, this plasmid was replicated linearly using primers LC129/LC130 with MluI cut sites between the upstream and downstream saeR sequences. Separately, the kanamycin resistance gene aphA3 was amplified from pOSKAR using primers JC292/JC304 with MluI cut sites. The linearized plasmid and aphA3 gene were digested with MluI and ligated. This plasmid was electroporated into competent BH10C E. coli cells and plated onto LB plates supplemented with Cm and Kan for propagation. The plasmid was electroporated into electrocompetent A909 cells, and a two-step temperature-dependent selection process was used to isolate mutants of interest (43). Briefly, cells containing each deletion construct were grown at the permissive temperature (30°C) and then shifted to 37°C and plated on the THY plates containing Cm and Kan to select for bacteria in which the plasmid had integrated at one of the flanking regions. Cells were then grown at the permissive temperature to allow the plasmid to recombine out of the chromosome, and loss of Cm resistance but maintenance of Kan resistance was used to identify a successful second crossover event and loss of the mutation vector. Genotypes were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. The creation of A909Δ pbsP::cat was done using Gibson assembly of four fragments. The temperature-sensitive pJC162 (Ermr) vector was digested with EcoRI and PstI. PCR was done on the 984 bp immediately upstream of pbsP using primers LC169/LC170, on the chloramphenicol resistance gene cat using primers LC171/LC172, and on the 1,070 bp immediately downstream of pbsP using primers LC173/LC174. The three PCR products and the digested vector were combined with 2× HiFi DNA Assembly master mix (E2621; New England BioLabs [NEB]) and incubated at 50°C for 60 min. This mixture was then electroporated into E. coli BH10C cells and plated onto LB plates supplemented with Erm and Cm, and the knockout was created as described above, selecting for Cm colonies that lost the Erm resistance marker.

To create the complementation plasmid pLC010, the pbsP gene was amplified from A909 genomic DNA using primers LC253/LC254. Plasmid pJC303, a pLZ-12-Spec-based plasmid with a constitutive recA promoter, was digested with NotI and BamHI. The digested plasmid and pbsP PCR product were assembled using a Gibson reaction with 2× NEBuilder Hifi DNA Assembly master mix (E2621; New England BioLabs). The resulting plasmid, pLC010, was electroporated into E. coli BH10C cells. Following propagation in E. coli, the plasmid was sequenced and electroporated into electrocompetent A909ΔpbsP cells and recovered on THY Cm, Spec plates.

Preparation of cDNA and qPCR.

All primers used in qPCR are listed in Table S2. cDNA for qPCR was made using DNase I-treated RNA from cells incubated with either PBS or pooled vaginal lavage fluids. cDNA preparation was done using the Superscript III first-strand synthesis system (18080051; Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions, including treatment with RNase H. Amplification was done using antisense gene-specific primers LC060 (gyrA), LC133 (pbsP), and LC199 (sak_1753). cDNA was diluted between 1:2 and 1:5, depending on the desired concentration, and used for qPCR. qRT-PCR was done using the Fast SYBR green master mix (4385612; Applied Biosystems) and a CFX Connect Real Time PCR detection system (1855200; Bio-Rad). The gyrase A gene (gyrA), a housekeeping gene not seen to have differential expression during growth in the vaginal tract, was used as a reference gene. All samples were run in triplicate technical replicates on a single plate, and triplicate biological replicates were used to determine final statistics.

SaeR D53E protein expression and purification.

Cloning of saeR D53E into the pET21a expression vector containing a 6His tag was done using the NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly master mix (New England BioLabs). A 692-bp gblock fragment of saeR (sak_0467) containing a D53E mutation was ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies. The gblock fragment was amplified by PCR using primers LC190/LC191. This product and pET21a vector were digested with XhoI and XbaI. The plasmid and DNA were ligated using 2× Hifi master mix (NEB). The resulting plasmid was electroporated into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and selected on LB agar plates containing ampicillin. BL21 cells containing the expression plasmid were grown overnight in LB containing Amp and back diluted to 1:20 into 1 liter fresh LB medium and grown at 37°C. When cells reached an OD600 of approximately 0.5, 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added. Cells were incubated at 28°C for 6 h and then harvested and frozen overnight at −20°C. Cells were lysed in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0)–100 μg/ml lysozyme using sonication. Lysed cells were spun down, and supernatant was passed through a 0.4-μm filter. Protein was purified using a 3-ml HisPur Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) column (88226; Thermo Fisher). Glycerol (20%) was added to purified protein preparations prior to storage at −80°C.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA).

Primers used for EMSA probe DNA are listed in Table S2. The pbsP promoter DNA probe (195 bp) was amplified using primers LC203/LC204. LC203 includes a 5′ fluorescent 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM) tag (Sigma). Unlabeled pbsP promoter DNA probe (191 bp) was amplified using unlabeled primers LC204/LC142. Unlabeled nonbinding DNA (100 bp) was amplified using unlabeled primers LC231/232. EMSA reaction volumes included 5 nM labeled probe, 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.05% Triton X-100, 12% glycerol, 10 μg bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 50 ng salmon sperm DNA. Protein was added in the concentrations shown in Fig. 5C. When needed, unlabeled pbsP promoter DNA or unlabeled nonbinding DNA was added as shown in Fig. 5C. Reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Xylene cyanol (5%, 1 μl) was added to each reaction mixture, and 10 μl was run on a 6% nondenaturing Tris-borate polyacrylamide gel (120-V prerun for 30 min, 120-V run for 75 min). The gel was sandwiched between clear polypropylene sheet protectors and imaged using a Typhoon Trio Variable Mode Imager (GE Healthcare) using fluorescent excitation/emission wavelengths of 488/520 nm.

Ethics statement.

All mouse experimentation was approved by the University of Illinois at Chicago Animal Care and Use Committee (ACC) and IACUC under protocol number 16-068. All animal work was carried out using accepted veterinary standards in accordance with the Animal Care Policies of the University of Illinois at Chicago Office of Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety Committee and IACUC. This institution has Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3460.01 on file with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, NIH.

Accession number(s).

Sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI GEO database under accession no. GSE109680.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the University of Chicago Genomics Facility for running the RNA-Seq samples, Kelly Doran and Katy Patras for instructions on the GBS vaginal animal model, and Ted Bae for helpful insights into the SaeRS system.

Michael J. Federle is the principal investigator (PI) on NIH grant AI091779 and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Investigators in Pathogenesis of Infectious Diseases. Laura C. C. Cook was supported by NIH F32AI110047-01. Portions of this project were supported by a Chicago Biomedical Consortium Postdoctoral Research Grant. Mark Maienschein-Cline and Hong Hu are supported in part by NIH CTSA UL1TR002003. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00762-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baker CJ, Barrett FF. 1973. Transmission of group B streptococci among parturient women and their neonates. J Pediatr 83:919–925. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(73)80524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ. 2010. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease—revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recommend Rep 59:1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schrag SJ, Verani JR. 2013. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: experience in the United States and implications for a potential group B streptococcal vaccine. Vaccine 31(Suppl 4):D20–D26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aloisio I, Mazzola G, Corvaglia LT, Tonti G, Faldella G, Biavati B, Di Gioia D. 2014. Influence of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against group B Streptococcus on the early newborn gut composition and evaluation of the anti-Streptococcus activity of Bifidobacterium strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6051–6060. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5712-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Patras KA, Rosler B, Thoman ML, Doran KS. 2015. Characterization of host immunity during persistent vaginal colonization by Group B Streptococcus. Mucosal Immunol 8:1339–1348. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zawaneh SM, Ayoub EM, Baer H, Cruz AC, Spellacy WN. 1981. Cyclic variation in the adherence of group B streptococci to human vaginal epithelial cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:381–386. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Botta GA. 1979. Hormonal and type-dependent adhesion of group B streptococci to human vaginal cells. Infect Immun 25:1084–1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patras KA, Wang NY, Fletcher EM, Cavaco CK, Jimenez A, Garg M, Fierer J, Sheen TR, Rajagopal L, Doran KS. 2013. Group B Streptococcus CovR regulation modulates host immune signalling pathways to promote vaginal colonization. Cell Microbiol 15:1154–1167. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sheen TR, Jimenez A, Wang NY, Banerjee A, van Sorge NM, Doran KS. 2011. Serine-rich repeat proteins and pili promote Streptococcus agalactiae colonization of the vaginal tract. J Bacteriol 193:6834–6842. doi: 10.1128/JB.00094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang NY, Patras KA, Seo HS, Cavaco CK, Rosler B, Neely MN, Sullam PM, Doran KS. 2014. Group B streptococcal serine-rich repeat proteins promote interaction with fibrinogen and vaginal colonization. J Infect Dis 210:982–991. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giraudo AT, Cheung AL, Nagel R. 1997. The sae locus of Staphylococcus aureus controls exoprotein synthesis at the transcriptional level. Arch Microbiol 168:53–58. doi: 10.1007/s002030050469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Giraudo AT, Calzolari A, Cataldi AA, Bogni C, Nagel R. 1999. The sae locus of Staphylococcus aureus encodes a two-component regulatory system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 177:15–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harraghy N, Kormanec J, Wolz C, Homerova D, Goerke C, Ohlsen K, Qazi S, Hill P, Herrmann M. 2005. sae is essential for expression of the staphylococcal adhesins Eap and Emp. Microbiology 151:1789–1800. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27902-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Steinhuber A, Goerke C, Bayer MG, Döring G, Wolz C. 2003. Molecular architecture of the regulatory locus sae of Staphylococcus aureus and its impact on expression of virulence factors. J Bacteriol 185:6278. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.21.6278-6286.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xiong YQ, Willard J, Yeaman MR, Cheung AL, Bayer AS. 2006. Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin gene (hla) expression by agr, sarA, and sae in vitro and in experimental infective endocarditis. J Infect Dis 194:1267–1275. doi: 10.1086/508210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fozo EM, Quivey RG Jr. 2004. Shifts in the membrane fatty acid profile of Streptococcus mutans enhance survival in acidic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:929–936. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.929-936.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lu YJ, Rock CO. 2006. Transcriptional regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 59:551–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04951.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Faralla C, Metruccio MM, De Chiara M, Mu R, Patras KA, Muzzi A, Grandi G, Margarit I, Doran KS, Janulczyk R. 2014. Analysis of two-component systems in group B Streptococcus shows that RgfAC and the novel FspSR modulate virulence and bacterial fitness. mBio 5:e00870-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00870-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Giraudo AT, Martinez GL, Calzolari A, Nagel R. 1994. Characterization of a Tn925-induced mutant of Staphylococcus aureus altered in exoprotein production. J Basic Microbiol 34:317–322. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620340507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jeong DW, Cho H, Jones MB, Shatzkes K, Sun F, Ji Q, Liu Q, Peterson SN, He C, Bae T. 2012. The auxiliary protein complex SaePQ activates the phosphatase activity of sensor kinase SaeS in the SaeRS two-component system of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 86:331–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08198.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buscetta M, Firon A, Pietrocola G, Biondo C, Mancuso G, Midiri A, Romeo L, Galbo R, Venza M, Venza I, Kaminski PA, Gominet M, Teti G, Speziale P, Trieu-Cuot P, Beninati C. 2016. PbsP, a cell wall-anchored protein that binds plasminogen to promote hematogenous dissemination of group B Streptococcus. Mol Microbiol 101:27–41. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jensch I, Gamez G, Rothe M, Ebert S, Fulde M, Somplatzki D, Bergmann S, Petruschka L, Rohde M, Nau R, Hammerschmidt S. 2010. PavB is a surface-exposed adhesin of Streptococcus pneumoniae contributing to nasopharyngeal colonization and airways infections. Mol Microbiol 77:22–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Papasergi S, Garibaldi M, Tuscano G, Signorino G, Ricci S, Peppoloni S, Pernice I, Lo Passo C, Teti G, Felici F, Beninati C. 2010. Plasminogen- and fibronectin-binding protein B is involved in the adherence of Streptococcus pneumoniae to human epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 285:7517–7524. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.062075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun F, Li C, Jeong D, Sohn C, He C, Bae T. 2010. In the Staphylococcus aureus two-component system sae, the response regulator SaeR binds to a direct repeat sequence and DNA binding requires phosphorylation by the sensor kinase SaeS. J Bacteriol 192:2111–2127. doi: 10.1128/JB.01524-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hagen KD, Meeks JC. 1999. Biochemical and genetic evidence for participation of DevR in a phosphorelay signal transduction pathway essential for heterocyst maturation in Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133. J Bacteriol 181:4430–4434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thompson LJ, Merrell DS, Neilan BA, Mitchell H, Lee A, Falkow S. 2003. Gene expression profiling of Helicobacter pylori reveals a growth-phase-dependent switch in virulence gene expression. Infect Immun 71:2643–2655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chang DE, Smalley DJ, Conway T. 2002. Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: an expanded stringent response model. Mol Microbiol 45:289–306. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sitkiewicz I, Musser JM. 2009. Analysis of growth-phase regulated genes in Streptococcus agalactiae by global transcript profiling. BMC Microbiol 9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mereghetti L, Sitkiewicz I, Green NM, Musser JM. 2008. Extensive adaptive changes occur in the transcriptome of Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus) in response to incubation with human blood. PLoS One 3:e3143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mereghetti L, Sitkiewicz I, Green NM, Musser JM. 2008. Remodeling of the Streptococcus agalactiae transcriptome in response to growth temperature. PLoS One 3(7):e2785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nobbs AH, Rosini R, Rinaudo CD, Maione D, Grandi G, Telford JL. 2008. Sortase A utilizes an ancillary protein anchor for efficient cell wall anchoring of pili in Streptococcus agalactiae. Infect Immun 76:3550–3560. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01613-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lamy MC, Zouine M, Fert J, Vergassola M, Couve E, Pellegrini E, Glaser P, Kunst F, Msadek T, Trieu-Cuot P, Poyart C. 2004. CovS/CovR of group B streptococcus: a two-component global regulatory system involved in virulence. Mol Microbiol 54:1250–1268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Papasergi S, Galbo R, Lanza-Cariccio V, Domina M, Signorino G, Biondo C, Pernice I, Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P, Teti G, Beninati C. 2013. Analysis of the Streptococcus agalactiae exoproteome. J Proteomics 89:154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Geiger T, Goerke C, Mainiero M, Kraus D, Wolz C. 2008. The virulence regulator Sae of Staphylococcus aureus: promoter activities and response to phagocytosis-related signals. J Bacteriol 190:3419–3428. doi: 10.1128/JB.01927-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu Q, Cho H, Yeo W-S, Bae T. 2015. The extracytoplasmic linker peptide of the sensor protein SaeS tunes the kinase activity required for staphylococcal virulence in response to host signals. PLoS Pathog 4:e1004799. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Howell-Adams B, Seifert HS. 2000. Molecular models accounting for the gene conversion reactions mediating gonococcal pilin antigenic variation. Mol Microbiol 37:1146–1158. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lancefield RC, McCarty M, Everly WN. 1975. Multiple mouse-protective antibodies directed against group B streptococci. J Exp Med 142:165–179. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van de Rijn I, Kessler RE. 1980. Growth characteristics of group A streptococci in a new chemically defined medium. Infect Immun 27:444–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chang JC, LaSarre B, Jimenez JC, Aggarwal C, Federle MJ. 2011. Two group A streptococcal peptide pheromones act through opposing Rgg regulators to control biofilm development. PLoS Pathog 7(8):e1002190. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv arXiv:1303.3997. [q-bio.GN].
  • 41.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. 2014. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Degnan BA, Fontaine MC, Doebereiner AH, Lee JJ, Mastroeni P, Dougan G, Goodacre JA, Kehoe MA. 2000. Characterization of an isogenic mutant of Streptococcus pyogenes Manfredo lacking the ability to make streptococcal acid glycoprotein. Infect Immun 68:2441–2448. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2441-2448.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fan X, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Niu L, Teng M, Sun B, Li X. 2015. Structure of the DNA-binding domain of the response regulator SaeR from Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 71:1768–1776. doi: 10.1107/S1399004715010287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES