Abstract
Cell-free protein synthesis has emerged as a powerful approach for expanding the range of genetically encoded chemistry into proteins. Unfortunately, efforts to site-specifically incorporate multiple non-canonical amino acids into proteins using crude extract-based cell-free systems have been limited by release factor 1 competition. Here we address this limitation by establishing a bacterial cell-free protein synthesis platform based on genomically recoded Escherichia coli lacking release factor 1. This platform was developed by exploiting multiplex genome engineering to enhance extract performance by functionally inactivating negative effectors. Our most productive cell extracts enabled synthesis of 1,780 ± 30 mg/L superfolder green fluorescent protein. Using an optimized platform, we demonstrated the ability to introduce 40 identical p-acetyl-l-phenylalanine residues site specifically into an elastin-like polypeptide with high accuracy of incorporation ( ≥ 98%) and yield (96 ± 3 mg/L). We expect this cell-free platform to facilitate fundamental understanding and enable manufacturing paradigms for proteins with new and diverse chemistries.
Cell-free protein synthesis allows for producing proteins without the need of a host organism, thus sparing the researcher experimental hassle. Here, the authors developed a cell-free synthesis method that enables incorporating non-standard amino acids in the product.
Introduction
Cell-free synthetic biology is emerging as a transformative approach to understand, harness, and expand the capabilities of natural biological systems1. The foundational principle is that complex biomolecular transformations are conducted without using intact cells. Instead, crude cell lysates (or extracts) are used, which provides a unique freedom of design to control biological systems for a wide array of applications. For example, cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) systems have been used to decipher the genetic code2, prototype genetic circuits and metabolic pathways3–7, enable portable diagnostics8, facilitate on-demand biomolecular manufacturing9,10, and produce antibody therapeutics at the commercial scale11. The recent surge of applications has revitalized interest in cell-free systems, especially in areas where limits imposed by the organism may impede progress. One such area is expanding the genetic code to incorporate non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) into proteins, where the extent of engineering can be limited by the fitness of the organism12–15.
Pioneering efforts by Schultz and others have demonstrated it is possible to genetically encode more than 150 ncAAs into proteins, and that this encoding can be a powerful tool15,16. For example, site-specific incorporation of ncAAs at single positions in proteins have provided new ways to study protein structure, dynamics, and posttranslational modifications17, as well as manufacture protein–drug conjugates18,19. However, inefficiencies associated with the engineered orthogonal translation (TL) machinery (e.g., TL elements that specifically use a ncAA and do not interact with the cell’s natural TL apparatus) have limited the ability to incorporate multiple ncAAs into proteins with high purity and yields20,21. A key constraint is that codon re-assignment strategies typically rely on amber suppression22, where the amber UAG stop codon is re-assigned to encode a ncAA and the orthogonal transfer RNA anticodon is mutated to CUA. The orthogonal ncAA-tRNACUA must then outcompete essential TL machinery (e.g., release factor 1, RF1) for the UAG codon. Historically, this competition has led to poor protein expression yields, as premature termination by RF1 exponentially increases with the number of amber codons in the coding sequence23. Poor protein expression yields limit applications in both basic and applied science.
Recently, a genomically recoded Escherichia coli strain was developed (C321.∆A) in which all 321 occurrences of the UAG stop codon were reassigned to the synonymous UAA codon24 using multiplex automated genome engineering (MAGE)25 and conjugative assembly genome engineering (CAGE)26. This allowed for the genomic deletion of RF1 (i.e., ∆prfA or ∆A) without affecting cellular physiology, thus freeing the UAG codon for dedicated ncAA incorporation24. Precursor RF1-deficient strains in which only a small set of essential genes were recoded have already shown the potential to produce proteins with improved ncAA incorporation efficiencies as compared with strains with RF124,27; however, the upregulation of natural suppression mechanisms (e.g., ssrA) is problematic, because they promote the formation of truncation products, especially for tens of incorporation events24,27,28. The fully recoded C321.∆A strain avoids these problems and we recently showed the possibility of using C321.∆A coupled with extensively engineered synthetases for multi-site incorporation of up to 30 ncAAs into a single biopolymer in vivo20. Based on these results, we hypothesized that the fully recoded C321.∆A strain would serve as an ideal chassis strain for the development of crude extract-based cell-free systems capable of highly efficient, multi-site ncAA incorporation into biopolymers. Such a system would complement in vivo manufacturing strategies, with some advantageous features29,30. For example, the open reaction environment means the supply of orthogonal TL system (OTS) components and their substrates necessary for high-level ncAA incorporation can be provided and controlled at precise ratios as a way to overcome enzyme inefficiencies. In addition, cell-free systems are not limited by viability requirements, thus avoiding constraints arising from toxic OTS components27. Our proposed approach based on the C321.∆A strain might also provide cost and ease of use advantages over other cell-free systems that have tried to reduce the effects of RF1 competition by using reconstituted systems31, antibody inhibitors32, RF1 depletion by subtractive chromatography33, or partially recoded E. coli strains with elevated natural suppression mechanisms34.
Here we describe the development of a CFPS platform from the genomically recoded C321.∆A to manufacture proteins with tens of identical site specifically introduced ncAAs. Specifically, we use MAGE to improve protein production capacity by inactivating negative effectors in the host strain such that they are not present in the lysate. By testing tens of strain variants, we isolate a CFPS platform capable of synthesizing 1,780 ± 30 mg/L of superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP), as well as modified sfGFP containing up to five p-acetyl-l-phenylalanine (pAcF) residues at high purity ( ≥ 98%). Using an optimized CFPS platform, we test the ability to synthesize elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) that contain up to 40 UAG codons. We demonstrate incorporation of 40 ncAAs per ELP protein with high yields (~ 100 mg/L) and high fidelity ( ≥ 98%) of site-specific ncAA incorporation.
Results
CFPS from extracts of a genomically recoded organism
To benchmark CFPS activity, we first compared sfGFP yields in extracts from C321.∆A and BL21 Star (DE3), the standard commercial protein expression strain (Fig. 1a). Combined transcription (TX)–TL reactions were carried out in 15 µL volumes for 24 h at 30 °C. Protein yields from BL21 Star (DE3) extracts were > 3-fold higher than those from C321.∆A (Fig. 1b), highlighting the need to improve protein synthesis yields to take advantage of the benefits of RF1 removal for making modified proteins with ncAAs for preparative purposes.
Previously, genomic modifications to the extract source strain to stabilize DNA template35, amino acid supply36, and protein degradation37 have improved CFPS yields from other source strains. For example, we engineered a partially recoded strain of E. coli (rEc.E13.∆A) by disrupting genes encoding nucleases (MCJ.559 (endA− csdA−)) to improve protein synthesis yields > 4-fold relative to the parent strain34. Building on this knowledge, we hypothesized that the genomic disruption of negative protein effectors in C321.∆A extracts would help stabilize essential substrates in cell-free reactions, extend reaction durations, and increase CFPS yields.
Strain engineering for improved CFPS performance
We targeted the functional inactivation of five nucleases (rna, rnb, mazF, endA, and rne), two proteases (ompT and lon), and eight targets shown previously to negatively impact amino acid, energy, and redox stability (gdhA, gshA, sdaA, sdaB, speA, tnaA, glpK, and gor) in C321.∆A individually and in combination (Supplementary Table 1). Our effort followed a five-step approach. First, we generated a library of single mutant strains in which we used MAGE to insert an early TL termination sequence into the open reading frames of gene targets that would functionally inactivate them, as we have done before34 (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Second, we confirmed gene disruptions using multiplex allele specific PCR and DNA sequencing. Third, we measured the growth rate for each of the MAGE-modified strains, noting that average doubling time increased 9 ± 9% above the parent strain (Supplementary Table 4). Fourth, cell extracts from each strain were generated using a high-throughput and robust extract generation procedure38. Fifth, we tested the strains in CFPS to assess their overall protein synthesis capability. We observed that seven single functional inactivation mutations increased CFPS yields more than 50% relative to the wild type C321.∆A strain; namely, rne−, mazF−, tnaA−, glpK−, lon−, gor−, and endA− (Fig. 2b). These results suggested that some of the protein effectors targeted for inactivation were deleterious to CFPS activity. They also demonstrated the difficulty associated with predicting CFPS productivities from engineered strains. For example, some mutations identified in previous screens (e.g., rnb− in rEc.E13.∆A)34 were not beneficial in the C321.∆A context, others which reduced cellular fitness enhanced CFPS activity (e.g., lon−), and yet others with no impact on cell growth (e.g., ompT−) led to poor extract performance (Fig. 2b).
With improvements in hand from single mutant strains, we next set out to identify synergistic benefits to CFPS productivity by combining highly productive mutations. We introduced the rne−, mazF−, tnaA−, glpK−, lon−, and gor− mutations to the best performing strain from our initial screen, strain C321.∆A.542 (endA−) (Fig. 2c). The combination of endA− and gor− mutations resulted in an extract capable of synthesizing 1,620 ± 10 mg/L of active sfGFP (strain C321.∆A.709). We then used C321.∆A.709 to generate six additional strains with combined mutations. Although we did not observe synergistic enhancements, our top performing extract chassis strain (C321.∆A.759 (endA− gor− rne− mazF−)) resulted in total yields of 1,780 ± 30 mg/L (Fig. 2d), representing a 4.5-fold increase in sfGFP yield relative to the progenitor strain (C321.∆A). In addition, we tested 12 combinatorial mutants generated throughout our MAGE screening, and although a few demonstrated CFPS yields > 1 g/L of active sfGFP, none surpassed the CFPS yields observed from C321.∆A.759 (Supplementary Table 5). Lastly, we determined that CFPS improvements seen in C321.∆A.759 brought on by genomic modifications could not be obtained by simply supplementing C321.∆A-based reactions with RNAse inhibitors (Supplementary Fig. 1). Final strains were fully sequenced to verify functional targeted modifications in the genome. Whole-genome sequences for strains C321.∆A, C321.∆A.542, C321.∆A.705, C321.∆A.709, C321.∆A.740, and C321.∆A.759 have been deposited in the NCBI SRA collection under accession code PRJNA361365. Each of the targeted mutations were achieved. MAGE has been shown to induce mutations throughout the genome before, and we observed a number of accumulated polymorphisms in the extract chassis strains. These polymorphisms, along with a specific list of protein-coding genes bearing mutations, are shown in Supplementary Tables 6 and 7. In the future, we seek to better understand the systems impact of the non-targeted mutations.
Based on our previous studies using rEc.E13.∆A[34], we hypothesized that the beneficial mutations in C321.∆A.759 reduced messenger RNA degradation and stabilized the DNA template. To test mRNA stability, we performed TL-only reactions using extracts derived from C321.∆A.759 and C321.∆A. Purified mRNA template coding for sfGFP was used to direct protein synthesis. We observed a twofold increase in mRNA and ~ 90% increase of active sfGFP using C321.∆A.759 extracts relative to C321.∆A extracts after a 120 min cell-free reaction (Supplementary Fig. 2). To test DNA stability, TX-only reactions were used. Specifically, plasmid DNA containing the modified red fluorescent protein–Spinach aptamer gene (Supplementary Table 3) was pre-incubated with cell extract and a fluorophore molecule, 3,5-difluoro-4-hydroxybenzylidene imidazolinone (DFHBI), for 0, 60, and 180 min. Then, CFPS reagents were added and mRNA was synthesized, then quantified by measuring the fluorescence of DFHBI-bound Spinach aptamer mRNA. After 180 min of pre-incubation, nearly 50% of Spinach aptamer mRNA was synthesized in C321.∆A.759 (endA−) extracts relative to the 0 min control. In contrast, the extract with endonuclease I (C321.∆A) decreased the maximum mRNA synthesis level by ~ 75% (Supplementary Fig. 3). Together, our data support the hypothesis that inactivating nucleases in the extract chassis strain stabilized DNA and mRNA to improve CFPS yields.
In addition to confirming added DNA and mRNA stability, we also assessed potential changes in energy and amino acid substrate stability that may have occurred in C321.∆A.759– relative to C321.∆A–based CFPS. Similar trends in ATP levels (Supplementary Fig. 4), adenylate charge (Supplementary Fig. 5), and amino acid concentrations (Supplementary Fig. 6) were observed in CFPS reactions derived from both strains. Supplemental feeding with the amino acids found to be most rapidly depleted did not improve yields (Supplementary Fig. 6f). The similar amino acid and energy stability profiles in C321.∆A.759 compared with C321.∆A suggest that our strain engineering efforts did not modulate the availability of these substrates.
To generalize CFPS improvements in C321.∆A.759, we next expressed four model proteins that have been previously synthesized in CFPS systems and compared productivities to BL21 Star (DE3). We observed a 31–63% increase in soluble and total protein synthesis of sfGFP, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and modified murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (mGM-CSF) in our engineered C321.∆A.759 extracts as compared to BL21 Star (DE3) extracts (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Autoradiograms of proteins produced using C321.∆A.759 extract show production of full-length sfGFP, CAT, DHFR, and mGM-CSF (Supplementary Fig. 7b and 7c). In addition, we observed disulfide bond formation in the model mGM-CSF under an oxidizing CFPS environment (– DTT), as has been previously shown (Supplementary Fig. 7c)39,40. In sum, the development of enhanced extract source strains by MAGE enabled a general and high-yielding CFPS platform.
Multi-site ncAA incorporation into proteins in CFPS
We next aimed to test site-specific ncAA incorporation into proteins using our high-yielding CFPS platform from C321.∆A.759-derived extracts and compare these results to reactions using extracts from BL21 Star (DE3) (containing RF1) and a partially recoded RF1-deficient engineered strain MCJ.559 based on rEc.E13.∆A. To do so, we transformed each organism with pEVOL-pAcF plasmid that expresses both orthogonal pAcF synthetase (pAcFRS) and tRNA (o-tRNAopt)41. Then, we quantitatively assessed the incorporation of pAcF into sfGFP variants with up to five in-frame amber codons. CFPS reactions were supplemented with additional OTS components based on our previous work27. Specifically, we added 10 µg/mL of linear DNA encoding optimized orthogonal tRNA in the form of a transzyme (o-tRNAopt) for in situ synthesis of the tRNA. The orthogonal pAcFRS was overproduced, purified as previously described, and added at a level of 0.5 mg/mL. The ncAA, in this case pAcF, was supplied at a level of 2 mM in each CFPS reaction. Total protein yields were quantified by 14C-leucine radioactive incorporation. Production of wild-type and modified sfGFP containing one UAG codon (sfGFP-UAG) was increased 77% and 92% in C321.∆A.759 extracts as compared with BL21 Star (DE3), and 120% and 145% as compared with MCJ.559, respectively (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8a). Moreover, we observed that sfGFP-UAG was expressed at 90% the level of wild-type sfGFP. Owing to the absence of RF1 competition, the major protein produced was full-length sfGFP using extracts derived from C321.∆A.759 and MCJ.559, whereas truncated sfGFP was visible in reactions catalyzed by BL21 Star (DE3) extract, presumably due to RF1 competition (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8a)30,42. Similar results were obtained with a second model protein, CAT with an in-frame amber codon at position 112 (CAT-UAG) (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8b). When expressing CAT-UAG using MCJ.559 extract, similar levels of truncated CAT relative to BL21 Star (DE3) were observed; however, this is most likely due to an upregulation of rescue mechanisms for ribosome stalling in the partially recoded strain34. Single pAcF incorporation into CAT-UAG using C321.∆A.759 lysate demonstrated only full-length product. Therefore, our completely recoded, genomically engineered C321.∆A.759 strain provides benefits for efficient ncAA incorporation without detectable levels of truncation product.
We then evaluated the ability of our high-yielding CFPS platform to facilitate incorporation of up to five identical ncAAs into sfGFP. For ease of analysis, a fluorescence assay was used, which indicated increased production of sfGFP in extracts from C321.∆A.759 (Fig. 3b). Results for BL21 Star (DE3) extract displayed an exponential decrease in active sfGFP synthesized with an increasing presence of UAG, leading to the production of no detectable active protein for sfGFP-5UAG. Active protein produced by C321.∆A.759 extract were ~ 2-fold greater than that produced by MCJ.559 extract, suggesting that benefits observed in increased yield can be extended to multi-site ncAA incorporation for our enhanced, fully recoded strain. Furthermore, we examined the ability to incorporate consecutive pAcFs into single protein. Protein gel and autoradiogram analysis of sfGFP with eight and nine consecutive amber codons indicated that this is possible, with the percent of full-length product being ~ 75% and 60%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 9).
In addition, batch reactions catalyzed by C321.∆A.759 extracts could also be scaled 17-fold without loss of productivity provided that a proper ratio of surface area to volume ratio is maintained (Supplementary Fig. 10)43. Of note, we believe our reactions could be further scaled to a wide range of volumes to produce larger amounts of protein if accounting for surface area to volume effects. For example, Sutro Biopharma has applied E. coli-based CFPS platforms to clinical manufacturing of therapeutics at the 100 L scale44, with an expansion factor of 106. In terms of cost, although we use a phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-based CFPS system here, cellular metabolism could be used to fuel cost effective, high-level protein synthesis suitable for manufacturing applications45,46.
After demonstrating benefits for protein expression, we carried out top-down mass spectrometry (i.e., MS analysis of whole intact proteins) to detect and provide semi-quantitative data for the incorporation efficiency of pAcF into sfGFP using extract derived from C321.∆A.759. Figure 3c shows the 28 + charge state of sfGFP and clearly illustrates mass shifts corresponding to the incorporation of one, two, and five pAcF residues. Site-specific incorporation of pAcF, as detected by MS, was ≥ 98% in all samples, with ≤ 1 p.p.m. difference between experimental and theoretical protein masses (Supplementary Fig. 11). In other words, efficient and high yielding site-specific pAcF incorporation into sfGFP was observed when using C321.∆A.759 extract. We went on to further show that extracts generated from C321.∆A.759 are compatible with multiple OTSs, showing the incorporation of p-propargyloxy-l-phenylalanine and p-azido-l-phenylalanine (pAzF) (Supplementary Fig. 12).
Multi-site ncAA incorporation into ELPs
We next explored the synthesis of sequence-defined biopolymers containing tens of site specifically introduced ncAAs using our efficient and tunable CFPS system. As a model biopolymer, we selected ELPs. ELPs are biocompatible and stimuli-responsive biopolymers that can be applied for drug delivery and tissue engineering47,48. Typically, ELPs consist of repeats of the pentapeptide sequence VPGVG, which is known to be a key component in elastin and exhibits interesting self-assembly behavior (random coil to helix) above its transition temperature. The structure and function of elastin is maintained as long as the glycine and proline residues are present; however, the second valine residue is permissive for any amino acid except proline and is therefore also permissive to ncAAs20. Previously, ncAAs have been introduced into ELPs by substituting natural amino acids with structurally similar ncAAs in CFPS systems49. Conticello and colleagues50 have also previously produced imperfect ELPs containing up to 22 ncAAs in vivo using an E. coli strain with an attenuated activity of RF1. We previously incorporated up to 30 ncAAs into ELPs by evolving orthogonal synthetases in vivo with enhanced specificities20. In this study, we constructed and tested in CFPS three ELP constructs containing 20, 30, and 40 UAG codons, as well as control proteins with tyrosine codons substituted for UAGs.
Before characterizing ELP yields, we first carried out a series of optimization experiments to enhance CFPS yields of sfGFP with 5 UAG codons, as expression yields for this construct were reduced in our initial studies (Fig. 3b). By testing total and soluble protein yields, we determined that the reduction in yield was a result of loss in sfGFP solubility and activity (Supplementary Fig. 13). However, a 31% increase in sfGFP-5UAG production was observed upon increasing pAcFRS levels 2-fold, pAcF levels 2.5-fold, and o-tz-tRNAopt 3-fold (Supplementary Fig. 14). Upon application of these optimized conditions, called OTSopt, to the synthesis of ELP-UAGs containing 20, 30, and 40-mers, total yields increased by 40%, 33%, and 26%, respectively, as compared with supplementing with OTS levels optimized for 1 ncAA incorporation (Supplementary Fig. 15). ELP-UAG products were visualized using an autoradiogram, which demonstrated the high percentage of full-length protein and whose band intensities corroborate total yields measured (Supplementary Fig. 15b).
We next applied OTSopt to the synthesis of ELP-UAGs with 20, 30, and 40-mers in the presence and absence of pAcF to demonstrate specificity of incorporation. ELP-UAGs were only synthesized in the presence of pAcF without any clear indication of truncation products, whereas no protein was observed in the absence of pAcF (Fig. 4). We anticipated that yields would decrease as the number of UAG codons increased due to the higher demand of pAcF-charged o-tRNA. In contrast, near wild type yields of ~ 100 mg/L were obtained for all UAG constructs. We then carefully examined the efficiency of multi-site ncAA incorporation using top-down liquid chromatography (LC)-MS of intact ELPs. LC-MS analysis showed ≥ 98% site-specific pAcF incorporation in ELP-UAG constructs of 20, 30, and 40-mers (Fig. 4).
Discussion
We present a crude extract-based CFPS platform based on the fully recoded C321.∆A strain that is capable of high-level protein expression. This platform was generated using MAGE to create libraries of improved extract chassis strains by targeting the functional inactivation of multiple negative effectors. A combinatorial disruption of the genes endA−, gor−, rne−, and mazF− (C321.∆A.759) increased total CFPS yields from 397 ± 24 mg/L in the parent strain to 1,780 ± 30 mg/L of sfGFP, which is the highest reported protein yield from RF1-deficient extracts. These improvements translated to the enhanced yield of proteins harboring site specifically introduced ncAAs.
By optimizing the cell-free environment for multiple-identical ncAA incorporation, we were able to achieve multi-site ncAA incorporation into multiple model proteins with high yields (~ 99% wild-type sfGFP expression yields for up to 2 ncAAs, ~ 95% wild-type ELP expression yields for up to 20 ncAAs, and ~ 85% wild-type ELP expression yields for up to 30 and 40 ncAAs) and purity ( ≥ 98% accuracy of ncAA incorporation) due to the absence of RF1 in our system. To our knowledge, these are the purest polymers with this many site-specifically introduced ncAAs (i.e., 40) synthesized to date. This exceeds our previous effort in cells that could synthesize ELP constructs with 30 UAG codons with 71% of the proteins having the desired 30 pAcF residues20. As such, our approach opens opportunities to site-specifically modify the dominant physical and biophysical properties of biopolymers. This will allow researchers to go beyond tag-and-modify approaches that have historically been the focus of ncAA incorporation efforts, because the field was previously limited to only one or a few instances of site-specific incorporation. Notably, our protein expression yields of ~ 1,700 mg/L and 99% suppression efficiency for sfGFP with 2 ncAAs outperform the best expression of proteins with single or multiple ncAAs in vivo, to our knowledge (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 13). For example, previous in vivo experiments using an RF1 knockout strain demonstrated the synthesis of enhanced GFP containing one, two, and three pAcFs at 3.5, 3.5, and 5.4 mg/L, respectively, corresponding to amber suppression efficiencies of 23%, 23%, and 36%51. Also in a separate report, an E. coli strain with attenuated RF1 activity produced 21, 17, and 27 mg/L of sfGFP with 3, ELP with 12, and ELP with 22 ncAAs incorporated, respectively50. However, increasing the number of amber codons (i.e., 12 and 22 ncAA incorporation) resulted in numerous truncation products. Here we demonstrate a cell-free system from engineered recoded bacteria that enables high yields of proteins containing up to 40 ncAAs with no observable truncation products. Thus, our cell-free system will serve as a complement to in vivo methods and be a useful technology for developing OTSs for robust synthesis of modified proteins.
Looking forward, incorporating our discovered mutations into a recently published optimized strain, C321.∆A.opt, might further increase the protein expression yields.52 In addition, as new genomically recoded organisms with free codons are constructed24,53–57, the development of extract chassis strains enabled by our MAGE-guided approach could aid the generation of highly efficient CFPS systems capable of incorporating two or more distinct ncAAs into a single protein or sequence-defined polymer. We envision that the generalized CFPS platform described here will be applied to on-demand biomanufacturing and biomolecular prototyping to transform biochemical engineering and expand the range of genetically encoded chemistry of biological systems.
Methods
Strains and plasmids
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Details for strain construction, plasmid construction, verification, and culture growth are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
Cell extract preparation
For prototyping engineered strains, cells were grown in 1 L of 2 × YTPG media (pH 7.2) in a 2.5 L Tunair shake flask and incubated at 34 °C and 220 r.p.m. to OD600 of 3.0. Cells were pelleted by centrifuging for 15 min at 5000 × g and 4 °C, washed three times with cold S30 buffer (10 mM tris-acetate pH 8.2, 14 mM magnesium acetate, 60 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM dithiothreitol)58, and stored at − 80 °C. To make cell extract, the thawed cells were suspended in 0.8 mL of S30 buffer per 1 g of wet cell mass and processed as reported by Kwon and Jewett59. Full details for cell growth, collection, and CFPS extract preparation are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
CFPS reactions
The PANOx-SP system was utilized for CFPS reactions46. Briefly, a 15 µL CFPS reaction in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube was prepared by mixing the following components: 1.2 mM ATP; 0.85 mM each of GTP, UTP, and CTP; 34 µg/mL folinic acid; 170 µg/mL of E. coli tRNA mixture; 13.3 µg/mL plasmid; 16 µg/mL T7 RNA polymerase; 2 mM for each of the 20 standard amino acids; 0.33 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; 0.27 mM coenzyme-A; 1.5 mM spermidine; 1 mM putrescine; 4 mM sodium oxalate; 130 mM potassium glutamate; 10 mM ammonium glutamate; 12 mM magnesium glutamate; 57 mM HEPES pH 7.2; 33 mM PEP); and 27% v/v of cell extract. For ncAA incorporation, 2 mM pAcF, 0.5 mg/mL pAcFRS, and 10 µg/mL of o-tz-tRNAopt linear DNA were supplemented to cell-free reactions. For multi-site and consecutive ncAA incorporation, OTSopt levels were increased to 5 mM pAcF, 1 mg/mL pAcFRS, and 30 µg/mL o-tz-tRNAopt. o-tRNAopt linear DNA was amplified from pY71-T7-tz-o-tRNAopt plasmid as described previously and transcribed during the cell-free reaction27. Furthermore, the o-tRNAopt was expressed in the source strain via a plasmid prior to extract preparation. Techniques for purifying aminoacyl tRNA synthetases are described in the Supplementary Methods. When testing the effect of RNAse inhibitor, 1 µL (4U) of inhibitor (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was added into each 15 µL reaction as per the manufacturer’s suggestion. Each CFPS reaction was incubated for 20 h at 30 °C unless noted otherwise. Fed-batch and scale-up reaction formats are described in the Supplementary Methods.
Protein quantification
Protein quantification was performed using fluorescence detection and radioactive 14C-Leucine incorporation and scintillation counting as described in the Supplementary Methods.
Whole-genome sequencing
As the gene encoding MutS is inactivated in C321.∆A, we chose to fully sequence the genomes of six key strains produced during our screening efforts (C321.∆A, C321.∆A.542, C321.∆A.705, C321.∆A.709, C321.∆A.740, and C321.∆A.759). Whole-genome sequencing was performed by the Yale Center for Genome Analysis for library prep and analysis as described previously60 (see Supplementary Methods). Genomes have been deposited to NCBI SRA collection, accession number PRJNA361365 (Individual accession numbers: SRX2511757-SRX2511762).
Nucleotide and amino acid quantitation using HPLC
Amino acid and nucleotide concentrations were measured via high-performance LC (HPLC). Cell-free reactions were clarified by precipitation with an equal volume 5% w/v trichloroacetic acid. Samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatant stored at − 80 °C until analyzed using an Agilent 1290 series HPLC system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). For amino acid analysis, a Poroshell HPH-C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm, 2.7 µm particle size; Agilent) was used with an automatic pre-column derivatization method using o-pthalaldehyde and fluorenylmethyl chloroformate61. Nucleotides were analyzed using a BioBasic AX column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm particle size; Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, FL). Full methods are described in the Supplementary Methods.
Full-length sfGFP and ELP purification and MS analysis
To confirm pAcF incorporation at corresponding amber sites, LC-MS analysis was performed on purified sfGFP and ELP reporter protein constructs with pAcF putatively incorporated. MS procedures and sample preparation details are given in the Supplementary Methods.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary files) or are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Genome sequences can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA361365/. Individual accession codes are: C321.∆A (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511762), C321.∆A.542 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511761), C321.∆A.705 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511760), C321.∆A.709 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511759), C321.∆A.740 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511758), and C321.∆A.759 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511757).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (N00014-11-1-0363), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-12-C-4211), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Chicago Biomedical Consortium with support from the Searle Funds at the Chicago Community Trust, the Air Force Research laboratory (FA8650-15-2-5518), the Army Research Office (W911NF-11-1-0445 and W911NF-16-1-0372), the National Science Foundation (MCB-1716766), the National Institutes of Health (NIH-MSTP-TG-T32GM07205), the Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar program, and the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation. This research was carried out in collaboration with the National Resource for Translational and Developmental Proteomics under Grant P41 GM108569 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health. R.W.M. is a recipient of the Ford Foundation Fellowship and NSF Graduate Fellowship. B.J.D. is a recipient of the NSF Graduate Fellowship. J. K. is an NDSEG Fellow. We thank Professor James R. Swartz for providing pK7-catGM-CSF plasmid, Professor Bradley Bundy for providing pY71 plasmids, and Professor Peter G. Schultz for providing the pEVOL plasmid. We thank Dr Rui Gan for constructing the pDAK-pAzFRS plasmid. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of Air Force Research Laboratory, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
Author contributions
R.W.M., S.H.H., B.J.D. and M.C.J. designed the experiments and study. R.W.M., R.D.M., M.G.W., A.S., B.J.D. and S.H.H. performed MAGE genome engineering. R.W.M. prepared cell extracts and reagents. R.W.M., N.I.M., M.G.W., A.K.C., and S.H.H. performed CFPS reactions and ncAA incorporation experiments. R.G.D., P.M.T. and N.L.K. carried out the quantitative mass spectrometry analysis. Y.C.K. performed mRNA and DNA stability analysis. J.E.K. performed HPLC analysis. S.H.H., M.A. and R.W.M. constructed ELP plasmids, and R.W.M. and C.X.C. performed expression and purifications. J.R.P. carried out genome sequencing and analysis. F.J.I. supervised the construction of the recoded strain, a subset of the ELP constructs, and genome sequence analysis. R.W.M., S.H.H., B.J.D. and M.C.J. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the experimental results and commented in writing the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-03469-5.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Perez J. G., Stark J. C., Jewett M. C. Cell-free synthetic biology: engineering beyond the cell. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol8, a023853 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Nirenberg MW, Matthaei JH. The dependence of cell-free protein synthesis in E. coli upon naturally occurring or synthetic polyribonucleotides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1961;47:1588–1602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.47.10.1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dudley QM, Anderson KC, Jewett MC. Cell-free mixing of Escherichia coli crude extracts to prototype and rationally engineer high-titer mevalonate synthesis. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016;5:1578–1588. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Karim AS, Jewett MC. A cell-free framework for rapid biosynthetic pathway prototyping and enzyme discovery. Metab. Eng. 2016;36:116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kay JE, Jewett MC. Lysate of engineered Escherichia coli supports high-level conversion of glucose to 2,3-butanediol. Metab. Eng. 2015;32:133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Noireaux V, Bar-Ziv R, Libchaber A. Principles of cell-free genetic circuit assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:12672–12677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2135496100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takahashi MK, et al. Rapidly characterizing the fast dynamics of RNA genetic circuitry with cell-free transcription-translation (TX-TL) systems. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015;4:503–515. doi: 10.1021/sb400206c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pardee K, et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell. 2016;165:1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pardee K, et al. Portable, on-demand biomolecular manufacturing. Cell. 2016;167:248–259 e212. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Salehi AS, et al. Cell-free protein synthesis of a cytotoxic cancer therapeutic: onconase production and a just-add-water cell-free system. Biotechnol. J. 2016;11:274–281. doi: 10.1002/biot.201500237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yin G, et al. Aglycosylated antibodies and antibody fragments produced in a scalable in vitro transcription-translation system. MAbs. 2012;4:217–225. doi: 10.4161/mabs.4.2.19202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park HS, et al. Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli with phosphoserine. Science. 2011;333:1151–1154. doi: 10.1126/science.1207203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Iwane Y, et al. Expanding the amino acid repertoire of ribosomal polypeptide synthesis via the artificial division of codon boxes. Nat. Chem. 2016;8:317–325. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lang K, Chin JW. Cellular incorporation of unnatural amino acids and bioorthogonal labeling of proteins. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:4764–4806. doi: 10.1021/cr400355w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu CC, Schultz PG. Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010;79:413–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.105824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dumas A, Lercher L, Spicer CD, Davis BG. Designing logical codon reassignment - expanding the chemistry in biology. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:50–69. doi: 10.1039/C4SC01534G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Young TS, Schultz PG. Beyond the canonical 20 amino acids: expanding the genetic lexicon. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:11039–11044. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.091306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cho H, et al. Optimized clinical performance of growth hormone with an expanded genetic code. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9060–9065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100387108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Currier NV, et al. Targeted drug delivery with an integrin-binding knottin-Fc-MMAF conjugate produced by cell-free protein synthesis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016;15:1291–1300. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Amiram M, et al. Evolution of translation machinery in recoded bacteria enables multi-site incorporation of nonstandard amino acids. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015;33:1272–1279. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O’Donoghue P, Ling J, Wang YS, Soll D. Upgrading protein synthesis for synthetic biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013;9:594–598. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chin JW. Reprogramming the genetic code. Embo J. 2011;30:2312–2324. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Albayrak C, Swartz JR. Direct polymerization of proteins. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014;3:353–362. doi: 10.1021/sb400116x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lajoie MJ, et al. Genomically recoded organisms expand biological functions. Science. 2013;342:357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.1241459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang HH, Church GM. Multiplexed genome engineering and genotyping methods applications for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Methods Enzymol. 2011;498:409–426. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385120-8.00018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hong SH, et al. Improving cell-free protein synthesis through genome engineering of Escherichia coli lacking release factor 1. Chembiochem: a Eur. J. Chem. Biol. 2015;16:844–853. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hong SH, et al. Cell-free protein synthesis from a release factor 1 deficient Escherichia coli activates efficient and multiple site-specific nonstandard amino acid incorporation. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014;3:398–409. doi: 10.1021/sb400140t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pirman NL, et al. A flexible codon in genomically recoded Escherichia coli permits programmable protein phosphorylation. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8130. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carlson ED, Gan R, Hodgman CE, Jewett MC. Cell-free protein synthesis: applications come of age. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012;30:1185–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hong SH, Kwon YC, Jewett MC. Non-standard amino acid incorporation into proteins using Escherichia coli cell-free protein synthesis. Front. Chem. 2014;2:34. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Josephson K, Hartman MC, Szostak JW. Ribosomal synthesis of unnatural peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:11727–11735. doi: 10.1021/ja0515809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Agafonov DE, Huang Y, Grote M, Sprinzl M. Efficient suppression of the amber codon in E. coli in vitro translation system. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:2156–2160. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Loscha KV, et al. Multiple-site labeling of proteins with unnatural amino acids. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 2012;51:2243–2246. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hong SH, et al. Improving cell-free protein synthesis through genome engineering of Escherichia coli lacking release factor 1. Chembiochem. 2015;16:844–853. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Michel-Reydellet N, Woodrow K, Swartz J. Increasing PCR fragment stability and protein yields in a cell-free system with genetically modified Escherichia coli extracts. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005;9:26–34. doi: 10.1159/000088143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Michel-Reydellet N, Calhoun K, Swartz J. Amino acid stabilization for cell-free protein synthesis by modification of the Escherichia coli genome. Metab. Eng. 2004;6:197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2004.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jiang XP, et al. Reduction of protein degradation by use of protease-deficient mutants in cell-free protein synthesis system of Escherichia coli. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2002;93:151–156. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(02)80007-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kwon YC, Jewett MC. High-throughput preparation methods of crude extract for robust cell-free protein synthesis. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8663. doi: 10.1038/srep08663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Heinzelman P, Schoborg JA, Jewett MC. pH responsive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor variants with implications for treating Alzheimer’s disease and other central nervous system disorders. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2015;28:481–489. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzv022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang J, Kanter G, Voloshin A, Levy R, Swartz JR. Expression of active murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in an Escherichia coli cell-free system. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004;20:1689–1696. doi: 10.1021/bp034350b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Young TS, Ahmad I, Yin JA, Schultz PG. An enhanced system for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;395:361–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Des Soye BJ, Patel JR, Isaacs FJ, Jewett MC. Repurposing the translation apparatus for synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015;28:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Voloshin AM, Swartz JR. Efficient and scalable method for scaling up cell free protein synthesis in batch mode. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005;91:516–521. doi: 10.1002/bit.20528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zawada JF, et al. Microscale to manufacturing scale-up of cell-free cytokine production-a aew approach for shortening protein production development timelines. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108:1570–1578. doi: 10.1002/bit.23103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Caschera F, Noireaux V. Synthesis of 2.3 mg/ml of protein with an all Escherichia coli cell-free transcription-translation system. Biochimie. 2014;99:162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jewett MC, Swartz JR. Mimicking the Escherichia coli cytoplasmic environment activates long-lived and efficient cell-free protein synthesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004;86:19–26. doi: 10.1002/bit.20026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Raucher D, Ryu JS. Cell-penetrating peptides: strategies for anticancer treatment. Trends Mol. Med. 2015;21:560–570. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Despanie J, Dhandhukia JP, Hamm-Alvarez SF, MacKay JA. Elastin-like polypeptides: therapeutic applications for an emerging class of nanomedicines. J. Control Release. 2016;240:93–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Catherine C, et al. Engineering thermal properties of elastin-like polypeptides by incorporation of unnatural amino acids in a cell-free protein synthesis system. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E. 2015;20:417–422. doi: 10.1007/s12257-015-0190-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu IL, et al. Multiple site-selective insertions of noncanonical amino acids into sequence-repetitive polypeptides. Chembiochem. 2013;14:968–978. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201300069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Johnson DB, et al. RF1 knockout allows ribosomal incorporation of unnatural amino acids at multiple sites. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:779–786. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kuznetsov G, et al. Optimizing complex phenotypes through model-guided multiplex genome engineering. Genome Biol. 2017;18:100. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1217-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ostrov N, et al. Design, synthesis, and testing toward a 57-codon genome. Science. 2016;353:819–822. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Richardson SM, et al. Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science. 2017;355:1040–1044. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Annaluru N, et al. Total synthesis of a functional designer eukaryotic chromosome. Science. 2014;344:55–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1249252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang K, et al. Defining synonymous codon compression schemes by genome recoding. Nature. 2016;539:59–64. doi: 10.1038/nature20124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang Y, et al. A semi-synthetic organism that stores and retrieves increased genetic information. Nature. 2017;551:644–647. doi: 10.1038/nature24659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Swartz JR, Jewett MC, Woodrow KA. Cell-free protein synthesis with prokaryotic combined transcription-translation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004;267:169–182. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-774-2:169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kwon, Y. C. & Jewett, M. C. High-throughput preparation methods of crude extract for robust cell-free protein synthesis. Sci. Rep. 5, 8663 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Gallagher RR, Patel JR, Interiano AL, Rovner AJ, Isaacs FJ. Multilayered genetic safeguards limit growth of microorganisms to defined environments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:1945–1954. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Henderson J. W., Brooks, A. Improved Amino Acid Mmethods using Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 Columns for a Variety of Agilent LC Instrumentation and Separation Goals. (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, 2010).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary files) or are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Genome sequences can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA361365/. Individual accession codes are: C321.∆A (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511762), C321.∆A.542 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511761), C321.∆A.705 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511760), C321.∆A.709 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511759), C321.∆A.740 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511758), and C321.∆A.759 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2511757).