Skip to main content
European Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to European Journal of Human Genetics
. 2017 Nov 8;25(12):1345–1353. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0021-2

Contribution of germline deleterious variants in the RAD51 paralogs to breast and ovarian cancers

Lisa Golmard 1,2,, Laurent Castéra 3,4, Sophie Krieger 3,4,5, Virginie Moncoutier 1, Khadija Abidallah 1, Henrique Tenreiro 1, Anthony Laugé 1, Julien Tarabeux 1,2, Gael A Millot 6,7, André Nicolas 1, Marick Laé 1, Caroline Abadie 8, Pascaline Berthet 9, Florence Polycarpe 9, Thierry Frébourg 4,10,11, Camille Elan 1, Antoine de Pauw 1, Marion Gauthier-Villars 1, Bruno Buecher 1, Marc-Henri Stern 1,2,12, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet 1,2,13, Dominique Vaur 3,4, Claude Houdayer 1,2,13
PMCID: PMC5865182  PMID: 29255180

Abstract

RAD51 paralogs (RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, and XRCC3) have recently been involved in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition: RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D in ovarian cancer, RAD51B and XRCC2 in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to estimate the contribution of deleterious variants in the five RAD51 paralogs to breast and ovarian cancers. The five RAD51 paralog genes were analyzed by next-generation sequencing technologies in germline DNA from 2649 consecutive patients diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Twenty-one different deleterious variants were identified in the RAD51 paralogs in 30 patients: RAD51B (n = 4), RAD51C (n = 12), RAD51D (n = 7), XRCC2 (n = 2), and XRCC3 (n = 5). The overall deleterious variant rate was 1.13% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–1.55%) (30/2649), including 15 variants in breast cancer only cases (15/2063; 0.73% (95% CI: 0.34–1.11%)) and 15 variants in cases with at least one ovarian cancer (15/570; 2.63% (95% CI: 1.24–4.02%)). This study is the first evaluation of the five RAD51 paralogs in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition and it demonstrates that deleterious variants can be present in breast cancer only cases. Moreover, this is the first time that XRCC3 deleterious variants have been identified in breast and ovarian cancer cases.

Introduction

Most currently known breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes play a role in repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination (HR): BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the two major genes and confer high risks of breast and ovarian cancer [1]; PALB2 confers a breast cancer risk modulated by family history and a moderate risk of ovarian cancer [2, 3]; BRIP1 may confer a moderate risk of ovarian cancer only [4].

While breast or ovarian cancer predisposition is caused by monoallelic germline deleterious variants in these genes, biallelic germline deleterious variants in BRCA2, PALB2, and BRIP1 result in Fanconi anemia, an autosomal recessive inherited syndrome characterized by developmental abnormalities, bone marrow failure and predisposition to various cancers [5]. Rare biallelic germline deleterious variants in BRCA1 can result in a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. BRCA2, PALB2, BRIP1, and BRCA1 are called FANCD1, FANCN, FANCJ, and FANCS, respectively, in the context of Fanconi anemia.

Genetic studies were recently conducted on RAD51 paralogs (RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, XRCC3), involved in the same DNA repair pathway: RAD51 is the key protein for HR; BRCA2 loads RAD51 monomers at DNA double-strand break sites and RAD51 activity depends on the RAD51 paralog family [6]. Biallelic germline deleterious variants in RAD51C and XRCC2 were identified in patients affected with a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. RAD51C and XRCC2 are called FANCO and FANCU in the context of Fanconi anemia. As several Fanconi anemia-related genes are also breast and/or ovarian cancer predisposition genes, RAD51C was subsequently studied as a candidate gene and was the first RAD51 paralog involved in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition [7].

Monoallelic germline deleterious variants in several RAD51 paralogs have been involved in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. The strongest evidence comes from identification of monoallelic germline deleterious variants in RAD51C and RAD51D that confer predisposition to ovarian cancer; their contribution to breast cancer is controversial[79]. Monoallelic germline RAD51B deleterious variants were reported in a breast and ovarian cancer family case and two unselected cases of ovarian cancer [10, 11]. Monoallelic germline XRCC2 deleterious variants were identified in breast cancer family cases but two subsequent population-based studies failed to confirm an association between XRCC2 deleterious variants and breast cancer risk [1214]. Finally, no XRCC3 deleterious variant was identified in breast and ovarian cancer cases but some XRCC3 neutral variants were associated with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility [15, 16].

In this study, the five RAD51 paralogs were analyzed on a large series of consecutive unrelated patients to better estimate their contribution to breast and ovarian cancers.

Patients and methods

Patients

This study was conducted on a series of 2649 consecutive unrelated patients diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer, including 2063 patients with personal and family history of breast cancer only, 570 patients with at least 1 ovarian cancer in their personal or family history, 9 patients with personal or family history of pancreas cancer and 7 patients with personal or family history of prostate cancer. Genetic testing for the RAD51 paralogs was proposed to patients based on personal or family history, in addition to BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Individual inclusion criteria were: (1) breast adenocarcinoma before the age of 36, (2) nonmucinous ovarian carcinoma before the age of 70, (3) triple-negative breast adenocarcinoma before the age of 51, (4) adenocarcinoma with medullary features, (5) breast and ovarian carcinomas, or (6) male breast cancer. Family history was defined as either (1) three breast cancer cases in first-degree or second-degree relatives in the same lineage, (2) two breast cancer cases in first-degree or second-degree relatives (with a transmitting male), with one cancer before the age of 40 or one cancer before 50 and the other before 70, or (3) one breast cancer case and one first-degree or second-degree relative (with a transmitting male) with ovarian cancer. Family history was the unique inclusion criterion for 112 patients that were unaffected by breast or ovarian cancer. All patients attended a visit for genetic counseling in a family cancer clinic. Patients gave their informed consent for genetic testing.

Genomic DNA analysis

Two different protocols of next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used for gene analysis of RAD51 paralog coding exons and exon–intron junctions. Gene analysis was performed by SureSelectXT (Agilent) enrichment and sequencing on GAIIx (Illumina) for 1701 patients, as previously described [17], or AmpliSeq (Life Technologies) enrichment and sequencing on Personal Genome Machine (PGM, Life Technologies), followed by bioinformatics analysis using the NextGENe software v2.3 (SoftGenetics), for 948 patients. AmpliSeq enrichment was performed on pools of 20 patient DNA for higher throughput instead of individual analysis.

Variant classification criteria

Criteria for deleterious variant class (variants that affect function) were: nonsense substitutions, frameshift insertions/deletions, or splicing variants leading to out-of-frame exon skipping or in-frame exon skipping located in a functional domain, confirmed by mRNA analysis. This class corresponds to pathogenic variants according to recommendations from the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG), except RAD51B p.(Arg8*) and p.(Arg47*) that would be considered as likely pathogenic as they were reported in population databases in two or one control, respectively, and RAD51C c.706-2A>G and A>T, likely pathogenic as they are not null variants but lead to in-frame exon skipping in a functional domain (Table 1) [18]. Criteria for likely deleterious variant class (variants that probably affect function) were: splicing variants by in silico prediction, missense variants with Align-GVGD class ranging from C45 to C65 [19], in-frame insertions/deletions, or stop-loss variants. This class corresponds to variants of unknown significance according to ACMG recommendations. The splicing effect of variants was predicted according to a previously published bioinformatics pipeline: a greater than 15% decrease of the MaxEntScan score and a greater than 5% decrease of the SpliceSiteFinder-like score for donor/acceptor splice sites [20].

Table 1.

Deleterious variants identified in the five RAD51 paralogs and patient history of breast and ovarian cancer

Gene Variant Variant class Personal history of Breast cancer (age at diagnosis) Personal history of Ovarian cancer (age at diagnosis) Family history of Breast cancer (age at diagnosis) Family history of Ovarian cancer PP class Allele count in controls dbSNP ID and hg19 genome coordinates
RAD51B c.22C>T, p.(Arg8*) Nonsense IDC (28) ER− PR− HER2+, SBR III None Mother (46), Maternal grandaunt (52) None >80 0/8600a, 1/4406b, 1/5008c rs138727212chr14:g.68290282C>T
RAD51B c.139C>T, p.(Arg47*) Nonsense Bilateral BC: IDC (51) ER+ PR+ HER2−, SBR II; ILC (74) ER+ PR+ HER2−, SBR III None Maternal cousin (80) None <40 1/5008c rs200355697chr14:g.68292235C>T
RAD51B c.139C>T, p.(Arg47*) Nonsense None OSC (42) None None <40 1/5008c rs200355697chr14:g.68292235C>T
RAD51B c.452+3A>G Splice Bilateral BC: DCIS (61), IDC (68) None 3 paternal cousins None <40 rs753393344chr14:g.68331859A>G
RAD51C c.577C>T, p.(Arg193*) Nonsense None OC (57) None Mother >80 rs200293302chr17:g.56780562C>T
RAD51C c.622_623del, p.(Ile208Leufs*7) Frameshift None OPSC (64) Maternal aunt, 2 maternal cousins None 40–80 rs765883905chr17:g.56780607_56780608del
RAD51C c.622_623del, p.(Ile208Leufs*7) Frameshift None OC (58) Mother None 40–80 rs765883905chr17:g.56780607_56780608del
RAD51C c.705+1G>T Splice BC (37) ER− PR− HER2−, SBR III None Mother None <40 -chr17:g.56780691G>T
RAD51C c.706-2A>G Splice None OSC (66) None Sister, mother, maternal aunt >80 rs587780259chr17:g.56787218A>G
RAD51C c.706-2A>G Splice None OSC (50) Paternal aunt and paternal cousin None 40–80 rs587780259chr17:g.56787218A>G
RAD51C c.706-2A>G Splice Bilateral BC: IDC (41) ER− PR− HER2+, SBR II; IDC (41) ER+ PR+ HER2-, SBR III None 2 sisters, 5 maternal aunts, 2 maternal cousins / 1 paternal aunt None >80 rs587780259chr17:g.56787218A>G
RAD51C c.706-2A>G Splice None OC (51) Maternal aunt None <40 rs587780259chr17:g.56787218A>G
RAD51C c.706-2A>T Splice Bilateral BC: IDC (32) ER− PR− HER2+, SBR III; BC (35) None Paternal aunt None <40 -chr17:g.56787218A>T
RAD51C c.890_899del, p.(Leu297Hisfs*2) Frameshift None OSC (48) None None <40 -chr17:g.56798159_56798168del
RAD51C c.910del, p.(Ser304Valfs*10) Frameshift None OPSC (59) None Sister >80 -chr17:g.56801406del
RAD51C c.1026+5_1026+7del Splice IDC (55) ER− PR− HER2−, SBR III None Sister (DCIS, 58), Maternal aunt (77) None <40 rs747311993chr17:g.56809910_56809912del
RAD51D c.637-2A>G Splice IDC (68) ER− PR− HER2−, SBR III Malignant Brenner tumor (62) None None <40 -chr17:g.33430565T>C
RAD51D c.754C>T, p.(Arg252*) Nonsense IDC (38) ER− PR− HER2−, SBR III None None None <40 rs587780104chr17:g.33430317G>A
RAD51D c.754C>T, p.(Arg252*) Nonsense None OPSC (66) Maternal aunt (<50) Mother? (pelvic cancer) 40–80 rs587780104chr17:g.33430317G>A
RAD51D c.754C>T, p.(Arg252*) Nonsense None OPSC (36) None None <40 rs587780104chr17:g.33430317G>A
RAD51D c.754C>T, p.(Arg252*) Nonsense IDC (38) ER+ PR+ HER2−, SBR II None Maternal aunt and grandmother None <40 rs587780104chr17:g.33430317G>A
RAD51D c.958C>T, p.(Arg320*) Nonsense BC (44) None Mother, sister None 40–80 rs750621215chr17:g.33428225G>A
RAD51D c.958C>T, p.(Arg320*) Nonsense PBC (42) ER− PR− HER2−, SBR III None Maternal cousin None <40 rs750621215chr17:g.33428225G>A
XRCC2 c.651_652del, p.(Cys217*) Frameshift None None Mother, maternal grandaunt, mother’s cousin None <40 rs746142129chr7:g.152345918_152345919del
XRCC2 c.677dup, p.(Tyr226*) Frameshift Bilateral BC: BC (52); IDC (62) ER+ PR+ HER2+, SBR II None Maternal grandmother None 40–80 -chr7:g.152345893dup
XRCC3 c.558del, p.(Asp186Glufs*9) Frameshift IDC (31) ER− PR− HER2−, SBR III None None None <40 -chr14:g.104169513del
XRCC3 c.681del, p.(Ser228Profs*18) Frameshift IDC (56), SBR II None 2 sisters and 1 paternal cousin None 40–80 -chr14:g.104165794del
XRCC3 c.782_783del, p.(Glu261Glyfs*29) Frameshift BC (29) None None None <40 -chr14:g.104165508_104165509del
XRCC3 c.910G>T, p.(Glu304*) Nonsense None Bilateral OC (58) None None <40 -chr14:g.104165266C>A
XRCC3 c.1010dup, p.(Arg338Alafs*21) Frameshift None Bilateral OPSC (53) None None <40 rs745775675chr14:g.104165166dup

Allele count in controls is from the Exome Sequencing Project in European American population

BC breast cancer, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma, PBC papillary breast carcinoma, OC ovarian cancer, OSC ovarian serous carcinoma, OPSC ovarian papillary serous carcinoma, ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, PP predisposition probability estimated by the Claus model [21]

a African-American population

b or the 1000 Genomes Project

c Accession numbers for RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, and XRCC3 genes are NM_133509.3, NM_058216.1, NM_001142571.1, NM_005431.1 and NM_001100119.1, respectively

Variant annotation

Accession numbers used in this report for RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes were NM_133509.3, NM_058216.1, NM_001142571.1, NM_005431.1, and NM_001100119.1, respectively. Variants were submitted to LOVD databases, at https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, or XRCC3.

mRNA analysis

RNA was extracted from breast tumors using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). 2 μg of total RNA from each sample was used for reverse transcription in a 40 μL reaction using the GeneAmp RNA PCR Core kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems). cDNA was amplified with forward and reverse primers 5′-tgcacaacttcaaggcaatc-3′ and 5′-ttgggtgacagagcaaaatg-3′ for RAD51B c. 1036 + 5 G > A variant, 5′-tgacctgtctcttcgtactcg-3′ and 5′-tccacttgtacacattgatttcac-3′ for RAD51C c.1026 + 5_1026 + 7del variant.

Results

Genetic variants in RAD51 paralogs

Twenty-one different deleterious variants were identified in the RAD51 paralogs in 30 patients: RAD51B (n = 4), RAD51C (n = 12), RAD51D (n = 7), XRCC2 (n = 2) and XRCC3 (n = 5) (Table 1) [21]. The overall deleterious variant rate was 1.13% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–1.55%) (30/2649). The deleterious variant classes were nonsense (n = 11; 37%), frameshift (n = 10; 33%) or splice (n = 9; 30%). RAD51C c.706-2 A > G and RAD51D p.(Arg252*) variants were observed in four unrelated patients. In addition, 15 likely deleterious variants were identified in 22 patients, predominantly missense variants (Supplementary Table 1). These variants were not taken into account in the contribution to breast and ovarian cancers as their causality needs to be assessed. Among them, RAD51B c.1036 + 5 G > A variant was detected in four unrelated patients; its impact on splicing was confirmed by mRNA analysis but this variant was not included because of its frequency in controls (4/2649; 0.15% patients vs. 5/8600; 0.06% controls from European American population in the Exome Sequencing Project; p = 0.28).

Clinicopathological characteristics of breast and ovarian cancers in RAD51 paralog deleterious variant carriers

Patients mutated in a RAD51 paralog gene were diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 15), ovarian cancer (n = 13) or both breast and ovarian cancer (n = 1). One patient was unaffected and included for breast cancer family history only (Table 1).

Among the 15 patients diagnosed with breast cancer, 5 were bilateral cases. The overall mean age of onset at first diagnosis of breast cancer was 45 years (range 27–68) (Table 2). The histological type of breast cancer was mostly invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) for the five RAD51 paralogs, but the histological subtypes were heterogeneous: the most frequent subtype was triple negative (estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative, HER2-negative (ER−, PR−, HER2−)) (6/14), which was observed for two RAD51C (2/5), three RAD51D (3/4) and one XRCC3-mutated (1/1) breast carcinomas but not observed in three RAD51B and one XRCC2-mutated breast carcinomas. RAD51B-mutated breast carcinomas were predominantly hormone receptor-positive (ER+, PR+) and HER2-negative (2/3).

Table 2.

Summary of age at diagnosis for breast and ovarian cancer for RAD51 paralog deleterious variant carriers

Gene RAD51B RAD51C RAD51D XRCC2 XRCC3 Total
Breast cancer
 n 3 4 5 1 3 20
 Range 28–61 32–55 38–68 52–52 29–56 27–68
 Median 51 39 42 52 31 43
 Mean 47 41 46 52 39 45
Ovarian cancer
 n 1 8 3 0 2 14
 Range 42–42 48–66 36–66 53–58 36–66
 Median 42 58 62 56 58
 Mean 42 57 55 56 55

Age at first diagnosis only was considered for bilateral cases

Among the 13 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, the overall mean age of onset at first diagnosis was 55 years (range 36–66) (Table 2). The histological type of ovarian cancer was mostly serous carcinoma. A rare type of ovarian cancer was observed, a malignant Brenner tumor, in a patient carrying a RAD51D deleterious variant.

Personal and family history of breast and ovarian cancer

Among the 30 patients with RAD51 paralog deleterious variants, 15 variants were identified in breast cancer only cases (15/2063; 0.73% (95% CI: 0.34–1.11%)) and 15 variants in cases with at least one ovarian cancer in their personal or family history (15/570; 2.63% (95% CI: 1.24–4.02%)) (Table 3). Concerning breast cancer only cases, deleterious variants were identified in the five RAD51 paralogs, with the highest rate in RAD51D (4 deleterious variants; 0.19%). Regarding cases with at least one ovarian cancer, XRCC2 was the only gene with no detected deleterious variant; the highest rate was in RAD51C (9 deleterious variants; 1.58%).

Table 3.

Distribution of RAD51 paralog deleterious variants in breast or ovarian cancer

At least one Ovarian cancer
Gene Breast cancer only Breast and ovarian cancer Ovarian cancer only Total for ovarian cancer Total
n = 2063 n = 538 n = 32 n = 570 n = 2649
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
RAD51B 3 (0.15) 0 (0.00) 1 (3.13) 1 (0.18) 4 (0.15)
RAD51C 3 (0.15) 8 (1.49) 1 (3.13) 9 (1.58) 12 (0.45)
RAD51D 4 (0.19) 2 (0.37) 1 (3.13) 3 (0.53) 7 (0.26)
XRCC2 2 (0.10) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 2 (0.08)
XRCC3 3 (0.15) 0 (0.00) 2 (6.25) 2 (0.35) 5 (0.19)
Total 15 (0.73) 10 (1.86) 5 (15.6) 15 (2.63) 30 (1.13)

Discussion

This study evaluated the contribution of germline deleterious variants in the five RAD51 paralogs to breast and ovarian cancers. These variants were detected at an overall rate of 1.13% [95% CI: 0.72–1.55%], in breast cancer only cases (0.73% (95% CI: 0.34–1.11%)) or cases with at least one ovarian cancer (2.63% (95% CI: 1.24–4.02%)).

RAD51 paralog deleterious variant rate

RAD51 paralog deleterious variant rate may be underestimated as variants that were likely deleterious by in silico prediction were also identified, in 22 patients (22/2649; 0.83% (95% CI: 0.47–1.19%)). The overall deleterious variant rate could therefore range from 1.13% (95% CI: 0.72–1.55%) to 1.96% (95% CI: 1.43–2.50%). Functional assays are needed to estimate more accurately the contribution of germline RAD51 paralog deleterious variants to breast and ovarian cancers. As each RAD51 paralog is necessary for HR, these assays could be measurement of HR frequency by DR-GFP or cell sensitivity to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, by cDNA-based complementation approach in cells deficient for the tested RAD51 paralog. Indeed, DR-GFP assay has been previously published for the five RAD51 paralogs and cell sensitivity to PARP inhibitors for RAD51C, RAD51D, and XRCC2 [8, 2225].

RAD51 paralog deleterious variants were identified in patients negative for BRCA1/2 deleterious variants but one patient was double heterozygote for a XRCC2 likely deleterious variant and a BRCA1 deleterious variant (Supplementary Table 1). Co-occurrence of RAD51C and BRCA2 deleterious variants has been previously reported in a breast cancer family [26].

Clinicopathological characteristics of breast and ovarian cancers in RAD51 paralog deleterious variant carriers

The most frequent histological type of breast cancer was IDC, as in the general population and previously reported for RAD51D-mutated breast tumors [14]. The histological subtypes of breast tumors were heterogeneous, as it was described in two previous reports on RAD51C-mutated tumors that suggested these tumors were similar to BRCA2-mutated breast tumors [13, 27]. Heterogeneity of histological subtypes was also reported for RAD51B in a study conducted on 46,036 invasive breast cancer cases and 46,930 controls that observed an association between RAD51B rs10483813 and rs999737 SNPs and breast cancer for most tumor subtypes [28]. The most frequent subtype was triple-negative, which was observed for RAD51C, RAD51D and XRCC2. This result is consistent with a recent study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25-gene panel of hereditary cancer genes, which revealed that the prevalence of deleterious variants in RAD51C was statistically higher among women with triple-negative breast cancer [29].

The most frequent histological type of ovarian cancer was serous carcinoma, as in the general population and in BRCA1/2-mutated tumors [30]. This result was also previously reported for RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D ovarian tumors [8, 11, 31].

Personal and family history of breast and ovarian cancer

RAD51B

The RAD51B deleterious variant rate was 0.15%, with three variants identified in breast cancer only cases (3/2063; 0.15%) and only one variant among cases with at least one ovarian cancer (1/570; 0.18%). To our knowledge, only one RAD51B deleterious variant was reported in a breast cancer case with an ovarian cancer family history [10]. A recent case-control study conducted on unselected ovarian cancer cases observed a low RAD51B deleterious variant rate at 0.06% (2/3401) in cases and no deleterious variant in 2769 controls [11]. Numerous Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) or case-control studies identified several RAD51B neutral variants as susceptibility factors for breast cancer [27, 28, 3235]. Overall, these data suggest that RAD51B is involved in breast cancer predisposition but further studies are needed to evaluate its contribution to ovarian cancer.

RAD51C

The RAD51C deleterious variant rate was 0.45%, with three variants identified in breast cancer only cases (3/2063; 0.15%) and nine variants among cases with at least one ovarian cancer (9/570; 1.58%). RAD51C was the predominant RAD51 paralog with deleterious variants identified in cases with at least one ovarian cancer, and the rate of 1.58% is quite similar to the rate of 1.3% previously reported for RAD51C germline deleterious variants in breast and ovarian cancer cases [7, 36]. RAD51C contribution to ovarian cancer has been established by numerous studies but its contribution to breast cancer is less clear [9, 3638]. Indeed, the first study by Meindl et al. identified 6 RAD51C deleterious variants in 480 cases with breast and ovarian cancer but no deleterious variant in 620 breast cancer only cases. Similar results were observed in other studies [9, 38]. Loveday et al. estimated the relative risk (RR) of ovarian cancer for RAD51C deleterious variant carriers to 5.88, with no evidence of breast cancer association [9]. A recent case-control study on unselected ovarian cancer cases estimated the odds ratio for RAD51C deleterious variants to be 5.2 [11]. The RAD51C deleterious variant rate in unselected ovarian cases was lower (0.41%). However, three RAD51C deleterious variants were reported in breast cancer only cases[3941]. Taking these results together with our results, we estimate that RAD51C contribution to breast cancer predisposition should be considered.

RAD51D

The RAD51D deleterious variant rate was 0.26%, with four variants identified in breast cancer only cases (4/2063; 0.19%) and three variants among cases with at least one ovarian cancer (3/570; 0.53%). This RAD51D deleterious variant rate of 0.53% in cases with at least one ovarian cancer is lower than the first study that established RAD51D as an ovarian cancer predisposition gene, with a deleterious variant rate of 0.9% (8/911) [8]. This discrepancy may be explained by a higher number of ovarian cancer cases in families studied by Loveday et al., as they reported a higher association with ovarian cancer for families with three or more affected individuals. Like RAD51C, contribution of RAD51D germline deleterious variants to ovarian cancer has been established by several studies but their contribution to breast cancer is less clear. In the first report on RAD51D, the relative risk of ovarian cancer for RAD51D deleterious variants was estimated to be 6.30 whereas the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32. RAD51D deleterious variants in breast and ovarian cancer family cases were also observed in subsequent studies [42, 43]. A recent case-control study on unselected ovarian cancer cases estimated the odds ratio of ovarian cancer for RAD51D deleterious variants to be 12, but the 95% CI was wide (95% CI: (1.5–90)) [11]. The RAD51D deleterious variant rate in unselected ovarian cancer cases was 0.35%. To our knowledge, only one breast cancer only family case with RAD51D deleterious variant was reported [44]. However, presence of numerous RAD51D deleterious variant carriers affected with breast cancer was recently reported, albeit in the context of familial ovarian cancer [42]. Taking these results together with our results, we estimate that RAD51D contribution to breast cancer predisposition should be considered.

XRCC2

Two XRCC2 deleterious variants were identified in breast cancer only cases (2/2063; 0.10%) and no deleterious variant in 570 cases with at least one ovarian cancer. These results are consistent with a previous report of XRCC2 deleterious variants in multiple breast cancer cases [12]. However, this association was not confirmed in two subsequent studies, although a relative risk <2 could not be excluded [13, 14]. Several case-control studies evaluated association of XRCC2 p.(Arg188His) neutral variant (rs3218536:G > A) with breast and ovarian cancer. Its association with breast cancer is controversial but its association with ovarian cancer was observed in three meta-analyses[4547]. Overall, the low XRCC2 deleterious variant rate needs studies on several thousands of cases and controls to evaluate XRCC2 contribution to breast and ovarian cancer.

XRCC3

The XRCC3 deleterious variant rate was 0.19%, with three variants identified in breast cancer only cases (3/2063; 0.15%) and two variants in ovarian cancer only cases (2/32; 6.25%). XRCC3 deleterious variant carriers had the lowest mean age of breast cancer onset, at 39 years. This is the first report of XRCC3 deleterious variants in breast and ovarian cancer cases. Combining these data with case-control studies that observed an association between XRCC3 neutral variants and breast and ovarian cancer suggest that XRCC3 deleterious variants may predispose to breast and ovarian cancer.

Follow-up strategies

In this study and previous reports on RAD51 paralogs concerning breast and ovarian cancer predisposition, there is an ascertainment bias for young age of onset as this is an inclusion criterion for genetic testing. However, except the unique XRCC2 deleterious variant carrier diagnosed with breast cancer at 52 years, the mean age of breast cancer onset for any RAD51 paralog deleterious variant carriers, 45 years, was similar to those reported in BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious variant carriers [1]. A specific breast cancer follow-up at younger age should therefore be recommended to RAD51 paralog deleterious variant carriers.

Two previous reports concluded that the high risk of ovarian cancer conferred by RAD51C germline deleterious variants should lead to suggestion of preventive oophorectomy, before or after menopause in the study by Blanco et al. [39] or Sopik et al. [48], as the mean age of ovarian cancer was estimated to be 49 or 60, respectively. A recent study proposed premenopausal preventive oophorectomy in RAD51C and RAD51D deleterious variant carriers as 18% of ovarian cancers in these patients occurred before 50 years of age [11]. In this study, 1 out of 8 ovarian cancers for RAD51C and 1 out of 3 ovarian cancers for RAD51D occurred before 50 years of age, at 48 and 36 years, respectively. The ascertainment bias for young age of onset is lower for ovarian cancer than for breast cancer as the personal history-based inclusion criterion is an ovarian cancer before the age of 70 (vs. before the age of 36 or 51 for breast cancer, for all subtypes or triple-negative breast cancer, respectively) and the family history-based inclusion criterion is an ovarian cancer whatever the age of onset. Given the poor prognosis of ovarian cancer and the elevated relative risks of ovarian cancer, premenopausal preventive oophorectomy should be discussed with RAD51C and RAD51D deleterious variant carriers.

PARP inhibitors have recently been validated as a new treatment of BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian cancer, and target tumor cells that are defective for DNA repair by HR [49]. As RAD51 paralogs are involved in the same pathway, PARP inhibitors could also be effective on RAD51 paralog-mutated ovarian cancer. Some in vitro studies conducted on RAD51C and RAD51D-mutated tumor cells observed a sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, supporting their inclusion in clinical trials [8, 23].

Conclusion

This study is the first evaluation of the five RAD51 paralogs in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition and it demonstrates that deleterious variants can be present in breast cancer only cases. Moreover, this is the first time that XRCC3 deleterious variants have been identified in breast and ovarian cancer cases. Given the low deleterious variant rate of RAD51 paralogs, further studies are needed to estimate more accurately their clinicopathological characteristics. This study constitutes a sound basis for penetrance risk estimates through the genetic testing of relatives of variant carriers.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1 (46KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by INCa and DGOS in the context of the SiRIC program #2011-189.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1038/s41431-017-0021-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Mavaddat N, Peock S, Frost D, et al. Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:812–22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Antoniou AC, Casadei S, Heikkinen T, et al. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:497–506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Norquist BM, Harrell MI, Brady MF, et al. Inherited mutations in women with ovarian carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:482–90. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Easton DF, Lesueur F, Decker B, et al. No evidence that protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer risk: implications for gene panel testing. J Med Genet. 2016;53:298–309. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bogliolo M, Surrallés J. Fanconi anemia: a model disease for studies on human genetics and advanced therapeutics. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015;33:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prakash R, Zhang Y, Feng W, Jasin M. Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a016600. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, et al. Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2010;42:410–14. doi: 10.1038/ng.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ramsay E, et al. Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2011;43:879–82. doi: 10.1038/ng.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ruark E, et al. Germline RAD51C mutations confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2012;44:475–76. doi: 10.1038/ng.2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Golmard L, Caux-Moncoutier V, Davy G, et al. Germline mutation in the RAD51B gene confers predisposition to breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:484. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Song H, Dicks E, Ramus SJ, et al. Contribution of germline mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes to ovarian cancer in the population. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2901–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park DJ, Lesueur F, Nguyen-Dumont T, et al. Rare mutations in XRCC2 increase the risk of breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90:734–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hilbers FS, Wijnen JT, Hoogerbrugge N, et al. Rare variants in XRCC2 as breast cancer susceptibility alleles. J Med Genet. 2012;49:618–20. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pelttari LM, Kiiski JI, Ranta S, et al. RAD51, XRCC3, and XRCC2 mutation screening in Finnish breast cancer families. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:92. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-0880-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He XF, Wei W, Su J, et al. Association between the XRCC3 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis based on case-control studies. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:5125–34. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1308-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yuan C, Liu X, Yan S, Wang C, Kong B. Analyzing association of the XRCC3 gene polymorphism with ovarian cancer risk. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:648137. doi: 10.1155/2014/648137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Castéra L, Krieger S, Rousselin A, et al. Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:1305–13. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tavtigian SV, Deffenbaugh AM, Yin L, et al. Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral. J Med Genet. 2006;43:295–05. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.033878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Houdayer C, Caux-Moncoutier V, Krieger S, et al. Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1228–38. doi: 10.1002/humu.22101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;48:232–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chun J, Buechelmaier ES, Powell SN. Rad51 paralog complexes BCDX2 and CX3 act at different stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:387–95. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00465-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Min A, Im SA, Yoon YK, et al. RAD51C-deficient cancer cells are highly sensitive to the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:865–77. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hilbers FS, Luijsterburg MS, Wiegant WW, et al. Functional analysis of missense variants in the putative breast cancer susceptibility gene XRCC2. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:914–25. doi: 10.1002/humu.23019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rivera B, Di Iorio M, Frankum J, et al. Functionally null RAD51D missense mutation associates strongly with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2017;77:4517–29. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahlborn LB, Steffensen AY, Jønson L, et al. Identification of a breast cancer family double heterozygote for RAD51C and BRCA2 gene mutations. Fam Cancer. 2015;14:129–33. doi: 10.1007/s10689-014-9747-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Long J, Zhang B, Signorello LB, et al. Evaluating genome-wide association study-identified breast cancer risk variants in African-American women. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e58350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Purrington KS, Slager S, Eccles D, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 25 known breast cancer susceptibility loci as risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:1012–19. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Buys SS, Sandbach JF, Gammon A, et al. A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25-gene panel of hereditary cancer genes. Cancer. 2017;123:1721–30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lakhani SR, Manek S, Penault-Llorca F, et al. Pathology of ovarian cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2473–81. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gevensleben H, Bossung V, Meindl A, et al. Pathological features of breast and ovarian cancers in RAD51C germline mutation carriers. Virchows Arch Int J Pathol. 2014;465:365–69. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1619-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Figueroa JD, Garcia-Closas M, Humphreys M, et al. Associations of common variants at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1) with breast cancer risk and heterogeneity by tumor subtype: findings from the breast cancer association consortium. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4693–06. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stevens KN, Vachon CM, Lee AM, et al. Common breast cancer susceptibility loci are associated with triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6240–49. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thomas G, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, et al. A multistage genome-wide association study in breast cancer identifies two new risk alleles at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1) Nat Genet. 2009;41:579–84. doi: 10.1038/ng.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Orr N, Lemnrau A, Cooke R, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1182–84. doi: 10.1038/ng.2417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Osorio A, Endt D, Fernández F, et al. Predominance of pathogenic missense variants in the RAD51C gene occurring in breast and ovarian cancer families. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:2889–98. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Coulet F, Fajac A, Colas C, et al. Germline RAD51C mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet. 2013;83:332–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01917.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thompson ER, Boyle SE, Johnson J, et al. Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovarian cancer patients. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:95–99. doi: 10.1002/humu.21625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blanco A, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Santamariña M, et al. RAD51C germline mutations found in Spanish site-specific breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147:133–43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3078-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schnurbein G, Hauke J, Wappenschmidt B, et al. RAD51C deletion screening identifies a recurrent gross deletion in breast cancer and ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R120. doi: 10.1186/bcr3589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vuorela M, Pylkäs K, Hartikainen JM, et al. Further evidence for the contribution of the RAD51C gene in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130:1003–10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1677-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Bonache S, de Garibay GR, et al. About 1% of the breast and ovarian Spanish families testing negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 are carriers of RAD51D pathogenic variants. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:2088–97. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Osher DJ, De Leeneer K, Michils G, et al. Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovarian and breast cancer families. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1460–63. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baker JL, Schwab RB, Wallace AM, Madlensky L. Breast cancer in a RAD51D mutation carrier: case report and review of the literature. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15:e71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.He Y, Zhang Y, Jin C, et al. Impact of XRCC2 Arg188His polymorphism on cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e91202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhai M, Wang Y, Jiang MF. Arg188His polymorphism in the XRCC2 gene and the risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:10808–815. doi: 10.4238/2015.September.9.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kamali M, Hamadani S, Neamatzadeh H, et al. Association of XRCC2rs3218536 polymorphism with susceptibility of breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:1743–749. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sopik V, Akbari MR, Narod SA. Genetic testing for RAD51C mutations: in the clinic and community. Clin Genet. 2015;88:303–12. doi: 10.1111/cge.12548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Drew Y. The development of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: from bench to bedside. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:S3–S9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1 (46KB, doc)

Articles from European Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES