Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;9(18):14193–14206. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24447

Table 2. Results of uni- and multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) showing correlation of RFS with clinicopathological factors in patients with breast cancer (nCounter validation cohort).

Variable Univariate
HR 95% CI p value
TP53 status by signature (versus wild type) 4.94 1.57–15.5 0.003
pStage (versus Stage I) 3.94 1.11–13.9 0.018
Node (versus negative) 3.49 1.24–9.82 0.017
Pathological tumor size (versus T1) 1.68 0.61–4.64 0.322
Grade (versus 1–2) 1.51 0.54–4.26 0.439
ER (versus positive) 1.68 0.60–4.72 0.338
PgR (versus positive) 2.47 0.84–7.24 0.088
HER2 (versus negative) 1.54 0.35–6.80 0.590
Adjuvant chemotherapy (versus non-therapy) 1.39 0.50–3.82 0.529
Adjuvant endocrinetherapy (versus non-therapy) 0.84 0.29–2.45 0.747
Variable Multivariate
HR 95% CI p value
TP53 status by signature (versus wild type) 4.2 1.33–13.3 0.015
pStage (versus Stage I) 3.15 0.88–11.3 0.078

Abbreviations: pStage, pathological stage; Node, lymph node metastasis; ER, estrogen receptor; PgR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2; HR, hazard ratio;CI, confidence interval.