Abstract
Artificial metalloproteins (ArMs) containing Co4O4 cubane active sites were constructed via biotin-streptavidin technology. Stabilized by hydrogen bonds (H-bonds), terminal and cofacial CoIII–OH2 moieties are observed crystallographically in a series of immobilized cubane sites. Solution electrochemistry provided correlations of oxidation potential and pH. For variants containing Ser and Phe adjacent to the metallocofactor, 1e−/1H+ chemistry predominates until pH 8, above which the oxidation becomes pH-independent. Installation of Tyr proximal to the Co4O4 active site provided a single H-bond to one of a set of cofacial CoIII–OH2 groups. With this variant, multi-e−/multi-H+ chemistry is observed, along with a change in mechanism at pH 9.5 that is consistent with Tyr deprotonation. With structural similarities to both the oxygen-evolving complex of photosystem II (H-bonded Tyr) and to amorphous water oxidation catalysts (Co4O4 core), these findings bridge synthetic and biological systems for water oxidation, highlighting the importance of secondary sphere interactions in mediating multi-e−/multi-H+ reactivity.
TOC image

Oxygenic photosynthesis achieves the thermodynamically demanding oxidation of water by catalyzing a series of light-driven, proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) events at a Mn4CaO5 active site called the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC). In between the OEC and light-harvesting chlorophylls (P680) resides a tyrosine residue, referred to as YZ. By transforming electron transfer (ET) events at photooxidized P680+• into PCET events at the OEC,1 YZ circumvents the buildup of high energy intermediates during the 4e−/4H+ oxidation of water to O2. The global demand for inexpensive renewable energy brings to focus the elegance with which nature combines sunlight and water to make fuel. Artificial photosynthetic systems typically replace chlorophylls and the OEC with photoanodes and synthetic water oxidation catalysts (WOCs), respectively, but the challenge remains for the installation of PCET mediators like YZ capable of efficiently converting light-driven ET into PCET events. Positing such mediators proximal, but not directly coordinated to WOCs entails significant synthetic complexity. Additional challenges to catalyst design are the controlled synthesis of multinuclear metal complexes (capable of carrying out multi-e− chemistry) that maintain exchangeable coordination sites for substrate water molecules to bind and which, for cost-effective strategies, function near pH-neutral conditions.
To address these challenges, we have employed biotinstreptavidin technology2 to prepare ArMs in which biotinylated Co4O4 clusters are anchored within a protein (Sav) host. Featuring a μ3–O cubane structural motif, the metallocofactor models aspects of the OEC, as well as of synthetic Co(O)(OH) WOCs.3 We found that the host-guest interactions stabilize the Co4O4 core and were able to characterize these ArMs by single crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD). A series of ArMs were prepared that feature syn cofacial CoIII–OH2 ligation, and in which mutagenesis of the surrounding protein host provides distinct secondary coordination sphere interactions to these ligands. The electrochemical properties across this series were examined by square wave voltammetry (SWV) as a function of pH. Correlating structure with function, our data suggest that an H-bond interaction between Tyr and a terminal CoIII–OH2 gives rise to multi-e−/multi-H+ chemistry that is not operative in other ArM variants.
Scheme 1 depicts the structure of biot-β-Ala-1, a modified version of the tetranuclear CoIII4(μ3–O)4(OAc)4(py)4 complex (1). First prepared by Beattie,4 and later characterized by Das and coworkers,5 1 has been well-studied as a dimensionally reduced model for active sites within Co(O)(OH) thin film WOCs.6–12 Using recently reported ligand exchange methodologies,13 equilibration of 1 and biot-β-Ala was followed by flash chromatography to provide the pure monobiotinylated species. Among the series of biotinylated cubanes prepared (SI), the β-alanine linker provided optimal binding within Sav. Additionally, two protein mutations were required; K121A to minimize steric interference, and E101Q to prevent the binding of metal clusters to the exterior of the protein. The K121A/E101Q-Sav variant used as the parent protein host will be referred to as 2×m-Sav herein. Additional modifications to the secondary coordination sphere were achieved through mutation of position 112. Across the series of variants: S112, S112F, and S112Y (2×m-Sav), titrations revealed stoichiometric binding of 4 equiv. biot-β-Ala-1 per Sav tetramer (Figure S1).
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of biot-β-Ala-1.
Single crystals of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav were generated following an in crystallo insertion protocol.14 Figure 1a shows the structure of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav to 1.46 Å resolution. Some ligand positions about the CoIII centers could not be modeled due to insufficient electron density likely caused by ligand rotation (about the Co—Npy axis) or exchange processes (at fluxional Co—OH2 sites). In contrast to this dynamic behavior, electron density for water molecules coordinated to the Co centers is observed in the data. Ligand exchange between acetate ions and water molecules occurs in crystallo to produce new types of cubanes that are stabilized within the protein host.
Figure 1.

Single crystal XRD structures of biot-β-Ala-1⊂ 2×m-Sav (1.46 Å, PDB 6AUC) (a), and biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav (1.36 Å, PDB 6AUE) (b). Electron and anomalous density, and Fc–Fo omit maps are provided in Figures S2 and S3.
The syn coordination of two aqua ligands to Co1 and Co2 provide a relatively close O1⋯O2 distance of 2.62(4) Å. These aqua ligands are part of an ordered H-bonding network that we suggest aids in their stability. Protein residues S112 and G113, as well as structurally conserved water molecules O3 and O6 contribute to the H-bonding network (Figure 1a). The H-bond between Co1 O1 and the O3 water molecule (O1⋯O3, 3.24(4) Å) is held in place by H-bonds to S112 and the O6 atom of water molecule (3.14(4) and 2.74(4) Å). The terminal Co1–O1 bond is 1.95(4) Å, which is slightly longer than the Co2–O2 bond length of 1.79(4) Å.
The placement of a metallocofactor within Sav also introduces asymmetry within the Co4O4 cube that is not present in the symmetrical parent complex 1. For example, the acetate-bridged Co–O⎯Co angle of 93˚ in 15 is compressed to 80° for the corresponding Co1⎯O⎯Co2 unit in biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav. This structural asymmetry evokes aspects of the OEC, where dynamic breathing modes associated with Mn–O–Mn bending and stretching are postulated to play a key role facilitating water oxidation.15
With the structure of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav in hand, we sought to mutate Sav to place a Y close to the Co4O4 cluster, mimicking the positioning of YZ in PS II. Gratifyingly, solving the structure of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav (Figures 1b and S3)16 revealed a new H-bond between Y112 and O1. Comparison of the two structures reveals that both ArMs contain distinct H-bonds to terminally coordinated aqua ligands, including the same syn-aqua motif. In both cases, H-bonds between O4, O5, and the biotin carbonyl also stabilize terminal aqua ligation at Co4. However, in the biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav structure, one capping acetate is observed, bridging the Co2 and Co3 centers. Most intriguing about the biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav structure is the H-bond between Y112 and O1, which is assigned to a terminal Co–OH2 moiety (OY⋯O1 = 3.07(5) Å). Relative to the corresponding Co1–O1 and Co2–O2 bonds in biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav, these bonds are elongated in 2×m-S112Y-Sav to 2.17(5) and 2.08 (5) Å, respectively (Table S1). This change may be caused by the presence of a stronger H-bond interaction with Y112 relative to that with the O3 water in the biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav structure.17
Electrochemical experiments were performed with biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112X-Sav samples that were further purified using size exclusion chromatography. These samples were found to be stable in water for greater than 48 h as assessed by optical spectroscopy (Figure S4) and cyclic voltammetry (CV, Figure S5). Figure 2a presents SWV data collected with biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav as a function of pH. Unlike in the cases of 1 and biot-β-Ala-1 (Figure S6),12 oxidation of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav is irreversible. CV data collected at multiple scan rates (5, 10, 50 mV/s) failed to produce a reverse, reduction wave. The observation of Nernst-like electrochemical behavior suggests that these events are rapid, and unlikely to affect analysis of the preceding oxidation.18 Therefore, the potentials and pKa values reported in Figure 2 are interpreted as apparent rather than true values derived from reversible equilibria. The pH-dependence of oxidation was explored over the range 6–11 because above pH 12, protein oxidation occurs, and below pH 5, Co is lost from the cluster. Control experiments were performed in which the working electrode after SWV was placed in fresh solution, and the experiment was repeated. Similarly, filtering post-run SWV samples through 10 kDa MWCO filters, the flow-through was re-subjected to the SWV conditions. In both cases, low current (maximally 18%) was observed and no clear features could be elucidated (Figure S7).
Figure 2.

SWV data collected with 2 mM biot-βAla-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav (a), the observed oxidation potentials (Ep) plotted as a function of pH (b), and the corresponding SWV data collected with 1 mM biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav (c), and Ep vs pH plot (d). In gray are least squares linear regression lines.
The plot of Ep vs. pH for biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav displayed in Figure 2b reveals a linear correlation with a slope of −63 ± 8 mV/dec up to pH 8. This slope is in-line with a 1e−/1H+ (or 2e−/2H+) oxidation, which would have a theoretical value of −59 mV/dec.19,20 Above pH 8, Ep becomes pH-independent, suggesting there is an apparent pKa at this value. Biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112F-Sav was found to have very similar electrochemical properties to biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav, exhibiting a slope of −63 ± 4 mV/dec up to pH 8, and then becoming pH-independent (Figure S8 and Table S2). The structure of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112F-Sav (1.70 Å, Figure S9) shows a similar Co4O4 core to that of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav but the aqua ligands do not interact with the F112 residue.
Complex 1, as well as the biotinylated-Co4O4 cubane complexes (Table S3 and Figure S6), exhibit pKas of 2.9–3.5,12 and the related cubane [Co4O4(OAc)2(bpy)4]2+ was shown to have a pKa of 3.1 that corresponds to protonation of a bridging O2− ligand.21,22 Owing to the higher apparent pKa observed here, the presence of terminal aqua ligands, and the similar pKas reported for a dinuclear CoIII–OH2 system,23 we tentatively ascribe this PCET event to CoIII–OH2 ⇆ CoIV–OH. If correct, this step is analogous to the pre-equilibrium reaction that has been observed in related thin film WOCs.24 We note that the extent of charge delocalization within the singly oxidized cubane9,11 remains unknown within the ArMs. Although desymmetrization of the cubane may favor a localized electronic structure,9 the notation as CoIV–OH is a formal oxidation state rather than a descriptor of the electronic structure.
Biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav, displays different electrochemical properties (Figures 2c and d) relative to biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav (Figures 2a and b) and ⊂ 2×m-S112F-Sav (Figure S8). At pH values less than 9.5 (blue traces, Figure 2c), a slope of −38 ± 4 mV/dec is found, consistent with a 2e−/1H+ event (theoretical value of −29 mV/dec). At pH values greater than 9.5 (purple traces, Figure 2c), a slope of −140 ± 10 mV/dec is observed, which is most consistent with a 1e−/2H+ event (theoretical value of −118 mV/dec). From these data, we propose that Y112 engages in redox activity under the experimental conditions. To further explore this possibility, we performed SWV with biot-β-Ala ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav and biot ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav, proteins that lack a metallocofactor. At pH 10 we expected to observe Y−/Y• oxidation, and aimed to correlate this redox event with those observed in biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav. However, no redox activity was observed (Figure S10). Obtaining the structure of biotin ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav (1.36 Å, Figure S11), we found that in the absence of the metallocofactor, residue Y112 adopts a different orientation, placing it buried within the protein fold. The positioning of the phenolic residue limits accessibility, prohibiting SWV measurements.
The construction of ArMs provides opportunities for molecular control not possible in either fully synthetic or fully biological systems. For example, the metallocofactors within the biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112X-Sav family of ArMs maintain exchangeable coordination sites, enabling water to bind to some of the Co centers. Although common in biochemical systems, this type of substitution chemistry can be difficult to achieve synthetically because intermolecular reactions can occur. That two water molecules bind in a syn-fashion to adjacent Co centers is a significant discovery: this type of motif has been proposed as a key mechanistic intermediate in amorphous Co-WOCs,12,23,25–27 where edge-site availability has been correlated with activity.23,28,29
Many enzymatic metallocofactors have Y residues within the secondary coordination sphere that mediate the flow of protons and electrons.30 Duplicating these effects within synthetic systems is challenging because phenolic groups tend to coordinate to first-row transition metals. By using a protein host, we could install a phenol within the secondary coordination sphere of an immobilized metal cluster. In biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav, an H-bond is formed between Y and one of the aqua ligands, while direct coordination to the Co centers is avoided. Mutating this residue to F disrupts this H-bond and results in altered electrochemical properties.
A possible model fitting the electrochemical and crystallographic data is presented in Figure 3. Parts (a) and (b) illustrate a mechanism that is consistent with our data on biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-Sav; namely, the 1e−/1H+, and 1e− chemistry observed below and above pH 8, respectively. As noted earlier, the electronic structure of the oxidized cubane is unknown, and the Lewis structures of Figure 3 represent single resonance and tautomeric forms. Extended H-bond networks present in ArMs are also omitted. Figure 3c represents a mechanistic model for the type of chemistry that may be operative in biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav below pH 9.5. The potentials required to oxidized 112 and neutral, protonated Ys,31 are similar. This thermodynamic matching supports the possibility of electronic communication between the two redox-active centers. The presence of H-bonds between Co–OH2 and Y, and between adjacent Co–OH2 centers, support that redox cooperativity between the two sites may also be kinetically feasible. Above pH 9.5 (illustrated in Figure 3d) the potentials,31 and Pourbaix slope become consistent with primarily Y−/Y• localized ET. The pKa of Y can vary significantly in the protein environment,32 but in the relatively open Sav pocket, and in the absence of interactions that would be expected to significantly perturb the Y112 pKa (Figure 1b), we expect this value to be similar to that of the free amino acid and be close to 10.33,34 Thus, we propose the change in mechanism at pH 9.5 signifies deprotonation of Y, and that above pH 9.5, Y112 is oxidized by ET rather than PCET.
Figure 3.

Mechanistic model proposed to explain SWV and XRD data for 2×m-Sav (a and b) and S112Y-2×m-Sav (c and d).
The mechanistic insights gained through our studies highlight the precise balance that must be achieved between metallocofactors and PCET mediators in the design of artificial systems. In PS II, it is YZ• that drives the oxidation and deprotonation of the OEC. Here, the potentials required for cubane oxidation are higher than that of Y112 and the flow of electrons is opposite to that in PS II. The dynamics observed here are more like those found in cyctochrome P450s, in which a nearby Y serves as an electron sink, protecting the active site from deleterious off-pathway oxidations.35 Thus, the selection of Mn ions for biological water oxidation, and the optimum pH for enzymatic activity of 6.5,36 coincide with Y-driven PCET events.37 If WOCs are to incorporate PCET relays playing a similar role to that of YZ, either a stronger oxidant than phenol, or WOCs requiring lower oxidation potentials13 are needed. Notwithstanding, we have successfully installed a PCET mediator within the secondary coordination sphere of a “substrate”- bound multinuclear metal complex. Owing to this interaction, we observe multi-e−, multi-H+ reactivity not operative in other ArMs. By generating structure-function correlations at biomimetic metallocofactors, we begin to bridge the gap between molecular, materials, and biochemical systems for water oxidation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge generous gifts of biotin, codon-optimized pET24a-Sav plasmid, and iminobiotin-agarose resin from Prof. Thomas R. Ward. Prof. Matthew B. Francis and Jiang Wang are thanked for analytical instrumentation and helpful discussions. L.O. acknowledges the ACS Irving S. Sigal Postdoctoral Fellowship and A.S.B. acknowledges NIH (GM120349) for funding. T.D.T. thanks the U.S. DoE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH1123), R.H.-L. acknowledges the UC MEXUS-CONACYT Postdoctoral Fellowship, and A.L.F. acknowledges the A. O. Beckman Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Synthesis and characterization of biotin conjugates; primer sequences and methods for Sav gene construction, expression and purification; XRD sample preparation, data processing, refinement statistics, electron and anomalous density and Fc–Fo omit maps; biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112F-Sav and biotin ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav structures; SWV sample preparation, control experiments, CV and optical measurements over 48 h, Ep and Imax values, and binding titration data are provided free of charge at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Tommos C, Babcock GT. Acc Chem Res. 1998;31:18–25. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Heinisch T, Ward TR. Acc Chem Res. 2016;49:1711–1721. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kanan MW, Nocera DG. Science. 2008;321:1072–1075. doi: 10.1126/science.1162018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beattie JK, Hambley TW, Klepetko JA, Masters AF, Turner P. Polyhedron. 1998;17:1343–1354. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chakrabarty R, Bora SJ, Das BK. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:9450–9462. doi: 10.1021/ic7011759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McAlpin JG, Surendranath Y, Dinca M, Stich TA, Stoian SA, Casey WH, Nocera DG, Britt RD. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:6882–6883. doi: 10.1021/ja1013344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McAlpin JG, Stich TA, Ohlin CA, Surendranath Y, Nocera DG, Casey WH, Britt RD. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15444–15452. doi: 10.1021/ja202320q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stich TA, Krzystek J, Mercado BQ, McAlpin JG, Ohlin CA, Olmstead MM, Casey WH, David Britt R. Polyhedron. 2013;64:304–307. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hadt RG, Hayes D, Brodsky CN, Ullman AM, Casa DM, Upton MH, Nocera DG, Chen LX. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:11017–11030. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clatworthy EB, Li X, Masters AF, Maschmeyer T. Chem Commun. 2016;52:14412–14415. doi: 10.1039/c6cc08412e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brodsky CN, Hadt RG, Hayes D, Reinhart BJ, Li N, Chen LX, Nocera DG. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:201701816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701816114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nguyen AI, Ziegler MS, Oña-Burgos P, Sturzbecher-Hohne M, Kim W, Bellone DE, Tilley TD. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:12865–12872. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nguyen AI, Wang J, Levine DS, Ziegler MS, Tilley TD. Chem Sci. 2017;8:4274–4284. doi: 10.1039/c7sc00627f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mann SI, Heinisch T, Weitz AC, Hendrich MP, Ward TR, Borovik AS. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:9073–9076. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pushkar Y, Yano J, Sauer K, Boussac A, Yachandra VK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1879–1884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707092105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.An additional structure of biot-β-Ala-1 ⊂ 2×m-S112Y-Sav is also included in the SI (Figure S11, PDB# 6AUH). The major features of the two structures are similar, however we note that the higher resolution structure, which also contains stronger anomalous density for the four Co atoms (Figure S3), was obtained by including 1 mM Na2IrCl6 in the soaking buffer.
- 17.MacBeth CE, Gupta R, Mitchell-Koch KR, Young VG, Lushington GH, Thompson WH, Hendrich MP, Borovik AS. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:2556–2567. doi: 10.1021/ja0305151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Costentin C, Robert M, Savéant J-M. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:11179–111909. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00063a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pourbaix M. Thermodynamics of Dilute Aqueous Solutions. Co., E. A. &, Ed.; London: 1949. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pourbaix M. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions. 1st. Pergamon Press Ltd.; New York: 1966. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dimitrou K, Brown AD, Folting K, Christou G. Inorg Chem. 1999;38:1834–1841. doi: 10.1021/ic981237n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Symes MD, Surendranath Y, Lutterman DA, Nocera DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:5174–5177. doi: 10.1021/ja110908v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ullman AM, Brodsky CN, Li N, Zheng SL, Nocera DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:4229–4236. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b00762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Surendranath, Y.; Kanan, M. W.; Nocera, D. G. 2010, No. 14.
- 25.Surendranath, Y.; Lutterman, D. A.; Liu, Y.; Nocera, D. G. 2012.
- 26.Wang LP, Van Voorhis T. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2:2200–2204. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li, X.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. 2013, 13804–13813.
- 28.Du P, Kokhan O, Chapman KW, Chupas PJ, Tiede DM. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:1–16. doi: 10.1021/ja303826a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farrow CL, Bediako DK, Surendranath Y, Nocera DG, Billinge SJL. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:6403–6406. doi: 10.1021/ja401276f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gray HB, Winkler JR. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:10920–10925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512704112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Berry BW, Martinez-Rivera MC, Tommos C. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:9739–9743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112057109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yokoyama K, Uhlin U, Stubbe J. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8385–8397. doi: 10.1021/ja101097p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim K, Cole PA. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:6851–6858. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Seyedsayamdost MR, Reece SY, Nocera DG, Stubbe J. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:1569–1579. doi: 10.1021/ja055926r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yosca TH, Rittle J, Krest CM, Onderko EL, Silakov A, Calixto JC, Behan RK, Green MT. Science. 2013;342:825–829. doi: 10.1126/science.1244373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Berthold DA, Babcock GT, Yocum CF. Fed Eur Biochem Soc Lett. 1981;134:231–234. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tommos C, Tang X-S, Warncke K, Hoganson CW, Styring S, McCracken J, Diner B, Babcock GT. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:10325–10335. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
