Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2018 Feb 7;22(4):2071–2085. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13553

Regulation of insulin resistance and type II diabetes by hepatitis C virus infection: A driver function of circulating miRNAs

Adit Singhal 1, Aniruddh Agrawal 2, Jun Ling 1,
PMCID: PMC5867149  PMID: 29411512

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a serious worldwide healthcare issue. Its association with various liver diseases including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is well studied. However, the study on the relationship between HCV infection and the development of insulin resistance and diabetes is very limited. Current research has already elucidated some underlying mechanisms, especially on the regulation of metabolism and insulin signalling by viral proteins. More studies have emerged recently on the correlation between HCV infection‐derived miRNAs and diabetes and insulin resistance. However, no studies have been carried out to directly address if these miRNAs, especially circulating miRNAs, have causal effects on the development of insulin resistance and diabetes. Here, we proposed a new perspective that circulating miRNAs can perform regulatory functions to modulate gene expression in peripheral tissues leading to insulin resistance and diabetes, rather than just a passive factor associated with these pathological processes. The detailed rationales were elaborated through comprehensive literature review and bioinformatic analyses. miR‐122 was identified to be one of the most potential circulating miRNAs to cause insulin resistance. This result along with the idea about the driver function of circulating miRNAs will promote further investigations that eventually lead to the development of novel strategies to treat HCV infection‐associated extrahepatic comorbidities.

Keywords: bioinformatic analysis, circulating miRNA, diabetes, hepatitis C virus, insulin Resistance, microRNA, miR‐122

1. INTRODUCTION

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an enveloped, single‐stranded positive‐sense RNA virus with estimated 150‐170 million people chronically infected worldwide. Although the consequences of chronic HCV infection are generally associated with liver manifestations such as hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, steatosis (known as non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, NAFLD) and HCC, the liver‐related mortality of 350 000 individuals annually is still underestimated due to the lack of consideration of extrahepatic repercussions. Among these extrahepatic complications, a growing body of evidence has particularly shown that HCV infection is strongly associated with the dysregulation of glucose homoeostasis such as insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Studies thus far and especially a recent retrospective study with 2435 patients1, 2, 3 have confirmed the relationship between HCV infection and T2D: People infected with HCV are 4 times more likely to develop T2D; clearance of HCV with direct‐acting antivirals significantly decreases HbA1c and the dependence on anti‐diabetes medications; and HCV‐infected patients with uncontrolled glucose are at higher risk to develop advanced liver fibrosis, HCC, and exhibit decreased sustained virologic response (SVR) to traditional interferon treatment.

It is estimated that 75%‐80% of HCV patients will progress to chronic infection, the stage highly associated with the development of intrahepatic complications that subsequently lead to metabolic disorders. Mechanistic studies have revealed that HCV protein NS5A and the core protein directly inhibit microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) activity, thereby reducing very low‐density lipoprotein (VLDL) assembly and inducing hepatic steatosis. In addition, HCV core protein is also associated with excessive reactive oxidative species (ROS) production via impairment of PPARγ, thereby inducing oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and steatosis. Over time, accumulation of hepatic triglycerides leads to hepatic IR via decreased insulin‐stimulated glycogen synthesis and enhanced hepatic gluconeogenesis; such conditions further cause peripheral IR in multiple organs through increased circulating insulin and free fatty acid levels.4, 5 Meta‐analyses have further confirmed the positive relationship between HCV and IR.2, 6 Furthermore, non‐diabetic and non‐obese chronic HCV patients exhibit decreased peripheral glucose uptake and hepatic IR.7, 8 Decreased glucose abnormalities have also been reported among HCV patients who have SVR after interferon treatment,9, 10 further demonstrating the role of HCV in glucose metabolism. Proposed molecular mechanisms underlying this relationship include increased serum levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines TNF‐α, TNFR1, TNFR2, IL‐6, IL‐10, decreased adiponectin and increased intramyocellular lipocalin‐2.8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 These factors activate an array of intracellular signalling pathways that result in increased ROS, cellular stress and metabolic dysregulation.

There are a number of investigations on the molecular mechanisms of regulation of insulin signalling by HCV infection. Insulin‐treated liver tissue from non‐obese and non‐diabetic HCV‐infected patients results in increased levels of insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS‐1), but showing decreased levels of IRS‐1 tyrosine phosphorylation, PI3K activity and Akt phosphorylation.16 Similarly, HCV core protein has been found to increase serine rather than tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS‐1 in hepatocytes, resulting in its degradation and impaired downstream Akt signalling.17 HCV core protein also stimulates IRS‐1 serine phosphorylation via increasing mTOR levels, again resulting in decreased Akt signalling.18 Reduced surface expression of glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT2 with consequential reduction in glucose uptake in HCV‐infected hepatocytes has also been reported.19 Impairment of PI3K and Akt phosphorylation by HCV has also been demonstrated by several studies to be mediated via the increased level of suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3), which inhibits PI3K and Akt phosphorylation and stimulates IRS‐1 and IRS‐2 proteasome degradation.20, 21, 22 Additionally, increased ER stress response caused by HCV infection elevates protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), also an inhibitor of Akt.23 Despite these findings of IR development via direct effects on insulin signalling pathway, the complex relationship between intrahepatic HCV infection and extrahepatic IR remains elusive.

Interestingly, recent evidence has implicated changes in host microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles after HCV infection. Thus, we will focus on this relationship to analyse the development of extrahepatic IR associated with HCV infection in this study. miRNAs are ~22 nucleotide (nt)‐long non‐coding RNAs that function mainly by targeting the 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNAs, thus playing broad roles in regulating cellular functions such as development, differentiation, apoptosis, tumorigenesis, metabolism and host‐pathogen interactions.24 The association of specific miRNAs with certain disease states has therefore greatly accelerated the development of miRNAs into new biomarkers and/or as therapeutic targets. As miRNAs also exist in serum and other body fluids, study of extracellular and circulating miRNA profiles has become an important approach to investigate the systematic roles of miRNA in disease development. Although the functions of circulating miRNAs remain unclear, these miRNAs have been found to be highly stable under harsh conditions including boiling, pH change, long‐term storage at room temperature and multiple freeze‐thaw cycles, suggesting their important biological functions.25 More evidence has emerged to support the idea that circulating miRNAs can function like hormones to regulate gene expression in distant tissues and organs. The changes in circulating miRNA profiles have also been revealed to be correlated with various diseases including cancers, cardiovascular disorders and diabetes.25, 26, 27, 28, 29

Based on the analysis of current knowledge regarding the relationship between HCV infection and IR, we hypothesize that circulating miRNAs post‐HCV infection can target peripheral tissues and modulate their gene expression patterns, thus serving as drivers in the development of IR and T2D. Comprehensive literature review, bioinformatics and structural analyses were carried out to examine our hypothesis. The general study approach was outlined in Figure 1. We will first assess the overlap between circulating miRNAs from HCV infection and from T2D/IR, and then analyse the target genes of these miRNAs and their corresponding metabolic functions. In addition to the mechanisms described above on insulin signalling pathways, we will focus on the identification of metabolic effects associated with circulating miRNAs to improve our understanding of the complicated relationship between HCV infection and peripheral IR.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study approach. A flow chart illustrating the methods and tools used in this study

2. HCV INFECTION ALTERS INTRA‐ AND EXTRAHEPATIC miRNA PROFILES TO PROMOTE VIRAL PATHOGENESIS AND LIVER DISEASE

Although HCV does not directly encode miRNAs to influence cellular functions throughout the viral life cycle, changes in host miRNA expression profiles upon infection have been found to associate with various stages of HCV pathogenesis and liver diseases (Table 1). These observations have garnered attention to understanding the extracellular effects of these altered host miRNAs and their consequent functions in disease development and treatment.

Table 1.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection alters the liver miRNA profile to promote viral pathogenesis and liver disease

Hepatic miRNA Expression Target Function
HCV infection
miR‐122 Up HCV 5′ UTR Enhance HCV replication,48, 96, 98, 99 enhance HCV translation,97, 100 inhibit 5′ HCV RNA degradation101
Xrn1 Inhibit 5′ HCV RNA degradation102
Cyclin G1 Mediate alcohol‐induced increase in HCV replication103
Reduce SOCS3 promoter methylation, inhibiting interferon‐induced ISRE activity104
miR‐491 Down Inhibit HCV replication via down‐regulating PI3 kinase/Akt signalling33
miR‐130a Up IFITM1 Promote HCV replication via inhibiting type 1 interferon signalling45
miR‐21 Up MyD88, IRAK1 Promote HCV replication via inhibiting type 1 interferon signalling46
miR‐27a Up RXRa, ABCA1 Decrease viral infectivity via regulation of lipid metabolism52
miR‐196 Bach1 Relieve Bach1 repression of antioxidant/anti‐inflammatory HMOX1, inhibit HCV translation50
HCV NS5A region Inhibit HCV replication105
miR‐448 HCV Core region Inhibit HCV replication105
mir‐29 Down Inhibit HCV replication107
miR‐199a HCV 5′ UTR Inhibit HCV replication106
Growth, inflammation and fibrosis
mir‐449a Down Inhibit NOTCH signalling components and associated pro‐inflammatory marker YKL40108
miR‐21 Up SMAD7 Promote fibrosis via increased TGF‐beta signalling109
mir‐29 Down Inhibit cell proliferation and collagen expression107
miR‐155 Up APC Promote proliferation and tumorigenesis via Wnt signalling49
miR‐141 Up DLC‐1 Promote cell proliferation via inhibiting tumour suppressor DLC‐1110
miR‐193b Up Mcl‐1 Promote apoptosis via inhibition of anti‐apoptotic Mcl‐1111
miR‐491 Down Down‐regulate PI3 kinase/Akt signalling33
Metabolism
miR‐27a Up RXRa, ABCA1 Regulation of lipid metabolism including SREB/PPAR/Apo family proteins52
miR‐122 Up HCV 5′ UTR Correlates with plasma cholesterol concentrations, miR‐122 inhibition results in decreased plasma cholesterol concentrations53, 96

ISRE, interferon‐sensitive response element. Literature review revealed several key intracellular miRNA changes upon HCV infection; their respective identified targets and associated functions are highlighted. Note that miRNAs without expression information or identified targets are indicated by —.

2.1. miRNA profiling

Global miRNA expression profiling highlights its importance in understanding HCV pathogenesis and developing targeted therapies. miRNA profiling of HCV‐infected human hepatoma cells revealed 108 differentially expressed miRNAs (≥2‐fold change) upon acute infection. miR‐24, miR‐149, miR‐638 and miR‐1181 were further identified to be involved in viral entry, replication and propagation, suggesting their roles in virus maintenance, survival and consequential disease.30 Whereas in chronic infection, virus‐promoting miR‐122 was found to be down‐regulated and antiviral miR‐296 was up‐regulated, implicating the involvement of these miRNAs and their target mRNAs in infection progression and activation of host defence responses.31 Similar research on miRNA profiling in HCV‐infected hepatoma cells has also identified several down‐regulated miRNAs, including miR‐30(a‐d) and miR‐130a/301, which have targets involved in viral entry, propagation and host responses. Treatment of these cells with interferon‐α restored miRNA expression, thus indicating causal roles of these miRNAs in HCV pathology.32 Another miRNA profiling study of HCV‐infected hepatoma cells revealed the changes of several miRNAs, including miR‐192/miR‐215 and miR‐491, which can enhance HCV replication via the suppression of PI3K/Akt pathway.33 miRNA profiling of HCV infection also associates with HCC development via targeting mRNAs involved in cancer‐relevant pathways such as cell cycle, adhesion, apoptosis and cell proliferation.34, 35 miRNAs identified from these studies are varied, which may be due to different samples (cell lines, fresh and archived patient specimens) and the methods used. Nevertheless, these findings clearly indicate the important roles of miRNAs in HCV pathogenesis and associated complications.

The importance of miRNAs in liver pathology is also reflected on many aspects. While serum miR‐122 levels increase at early stage of fibrosis with high inflammation, later during the progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis, both hepatic and serum levels of miR‐122 are decreased by a large cohort study with 84 liver biopsies and 167 serum samples from chronic hepatitis C patients.36 This is largely due to the loss of hepatocytes, which is also consistent with the inverse relationship between hepatic miR‐122 and liver injuries under various conditions.37, 38, 39 miR‐122 is the most abundant miRNA in liver.40 It is also a good biomarker for liver damage correlated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) activities in HCV mono‐infection and HIV/HCV con‐infection conditions.41, 42 In addition, the increase in circulating miR‐122 is greater in HIV/HCV co‐infection than HIV mono‐infection43; miR‐122 is also correlated with liver injury and necroinflammation (eg IL‐6) caused by HIV and HIV/HCV infections.42, 44 Based on these important findings of miR‐122 in viral infection‐induced liver diseases, we will focus on miR‐122 in this study to discuss its role in linking HCV infection with extrahepatic comorbidities.

2.2. Immune response

Specific changes of miRNAs with infection have been found to impact host immune response. miR‐130a expression was increased in infected hepatocytes, and liver biopsy identified a target as the antiviral protein interferon‐induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1); subsequent exposure to anti‐miR‐130a increased IFITM1 expression.45 HCV infection has also been reported to activate miR‐21, thereby suppressing HCV‐triggered type I IFN production and promoting HCV replication. Two identified targets for miR‐21, myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase 1 (IRAK1), are involved in toll‐like receptor signalling and HCV‐induced type 1 IFN production. These findings demonstrate the potential role of miR‐21 in HCV proliferation and immune surveillance evasion.46 Furthermore, elevated cellular miR‐122 has also been described as an essential component of HCV replication and RNA accumulation in liver cells,47 thus serving as an ideal candidate for antiviral treatment. Concomitantly, a recent study showed that the sequestration of miR‐122 function via subcutaneous locked nucleic acid‐modified DNA antisense oligonucleotide (drug name: Miravirsen) therapy in infected patients generated prolonged dose‐dependent reduction of HCV RNA levels without viral resistance.48

Intrahepatic miRNA changes from HCV infection have also been found to stimulate inflammatory signalling pathways. Induction of miR‐155 upon HCV infection via nuclear factor kappa B (NF‐κB) was revealed to inhibit apoptosis and promote hepatocyte proliferation and tumorigenesis through targeting adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), a Wnt signalling inhibitor. Wnt pathway overexpression reversed this process and induced cell cycle arrest.49 miR‐196 was found to inhibit HCV replication through targeting Bach1, a transcriptional factor that negatively regulates heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), a key cytoprotective enzyme with antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties involved in oxidative stress and liver injury. Overexpression of miR‐196 was therefore proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy to protect against oxidative stress and HCV infection.50 A similar mechanism was identified in hepatitis B virus infection, wherein miR‐143 induced hepatocarcinoma metastasis via NF‐κB signalling and fibronectin repression, thus the down‐regulation of miR‐143 became an effective strategy to control HBV‐related liver cancer progression.51

2.3. Metabolic effects

Regulation of metabolism is another key function of miRNAs from HCV infection. miR‐27a was found to regulate lipid metabolism via targeting transcription factor RXRα and the lipid transporter ATP‐binding cassette subfamily A member 1. miR‐27a also repressed several lipid metabolism‐related genes (encoding SREB, PPAR and Apo family proteins) which are essential for the production of infectious viral particles. Repression of miR‐27a was conversely found to increase hepatocyte lipid content and viral replication and infectivity. Interestingly, miR‐27a has been found to be preferentially up‐regulated during HCV infection, providing a survival mechanism by which the virus can maintain a low viral load, evade host immune surveillance, establish chronic infection and secondarily promote hepatic steatosis.52 A similar study on miR‐122 also demonstrated the importance of metabolic effects of miRNAs. Depletion of hepatocyte miR‐122 by locked nucleic acid anti‐miR‐122 in non‐human primates generated a dose‐dependent decrease in plasma cholesterol.53 These findings along with other identified miRNAs can all target insulin signalling (eg PI3K/Akt), further demonstrating a critical role of miRNAs in associating HCV infection with the development of systemic extrahepatic complications via metabolic effects.

2.4. Circulating miRNAs derived from HCV infection

In addition to intracellular miRNAs, extracellular circulating miRNAs have been associated with the development and progression of various diseases (eg cancer and cardiovascular disease). To better understand the linkage between HCV infection and peripheral IR and diabetes, we seek to analyse miRNAs and their target mRNAs in these 2 disease conditions. Circulating miRNA profiling of newly diagnosed T2D patients and T2D‐susceptible individuals with normal glucose tolerance consistently finds miR‐34a to be significantly up‐regulated.54 A separate study reports miR‐134 to be down‐regulated in omental adipocyte samples from T2D patients,55 and miRNA profiling of streptozotocin‐induced diabetic mice reveals miR‐134 to be up‐regulated specifically in mitochondria of liver samples.56 Interestingly, a few of these miRNAs in T2D/IR have also been detected in circulating miRNA profiles of HCV‐infected individuals (Table 2). A recent study on circulating miRNA profiling in HCV patient serum samples identified miR‐134, miR‐198, miR‐320c and miR‐483‐5p to be up‐regulated when compared to healthy controls.57 Another study by Cermelli et al58 found serum levels of miR‐34a and miR‐122 to be significantly elevated in HCV patients and increased with the course of infection. The overlap of miRNA profiles between these disease conditions further suggests causative roles for HCV infection‐associated miRNAs in the development of extrahepatic diabetes and IR.

Table 2.

Circulating miRNA profiles (serum and plasma) associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and T2D/IR

Circulating miRNA Expression with HCV infection Expression in T2D/IR
miR‐16 Up58 Increased in serum T2D‐associated microvascular disease128
miR‐19a Up124
miR‐20a Up121
miR‐22 No change58
miR‐34a Up58, 124 Increased in serum T2D54; Increased in plasma T2D127
miR‐92a Up121
miR‐122 Up58, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 Increased in serum of obese young adults, independently associated with IR133, 134; Increased in serum, strongly associated with development of metabolic syndrome and T2D135
miR‐130a Up124
miR‐134 Up57, 119
miR‐146a Down124 Increased in serum T2D55; increased in plasma of newly diagnosed T2D, correlates with elevated heme oxygenase‐1132; decreased in serum T2D and pre‐DM125; Decreased in serum obese/dyslipidaemic T2D vs non‐T2D obese/dyslipidaemic controls, anti‐inflammatory with increased IL‐8 and HGF131
miR‐155 Up117 Increased in exosomes of obese mice, cause IR when administered to lean mice95
miR‐181a Up123 Increased in serum T2D, targets SIRT1130
miR‐192 Up118, 125 Decreased in serum T2D and pre‐DM125; decreased in plasma T2D, metformin increased miRNA vs placebo126
miR‐195 Up125 Decreased in plasma T2D126
miR‐198 Up58
miR‐221 Up122 Increased in serum T2D128; increased in serum T2D, BMI/HbA1c/TG positively correlated with miRNA129
miR‐296 Up124
miR‐320C Up57
miR‐424‐3p Up119
miR‐483‐5p Up57
miR‐494 Down120
miR‐629‐5p Up119
miR‐885‐5p Up120

miRNAs changed upon HCV infection were summarized; their alterations in T2D or IR were also listed for the comparative analysis.

3. miR‐122 AS A UNIQUE miRNA THAT LINKS HCV INFECTION TO IR AND DIABETES

Among all HCV‐associated intra‐ and extrahepatic miRNAs, miR‐122 is the most extensively studied. Many investigations have shown its involvement and necessity in the virulence of the HCV virus, including the enhancement of HCV replication and HCV mRNA translation, inhibition of HCV 5′‐RNA degradation, mediation of alcohol‐induced HCV replication and reduction in interferon‐induced ISRE (interferon‐sensitive response element) activity via inhibiting SOCS3 promoter methylation (Table 1).

Increased circulating miR‐122 is observed in serum and plasma with HCV infection, and circulating miRNA‐122 is elevated in serum of obese young adults and patients with T2D and IR (Table 2). These lines of evidence prompt us to carry out in‐depth analysis on the central roles of miR‐122 in the development of IR and T2D under HCV infection. The related peripheral targets of miR‐122 and their functions in metabolic and signalling pathways are comprehensively examined as follows.

3.1. miR‐122 target profiling on metabolic ontologies in peripheral tissues

To understand the potential metabolic effects of circulating miR‐122 in peripheral tissues, we first analysed the biological and molecular functional landscape of all miR‐122 targets. Using the DIANA‐microT‐CDS target prediction platform,59, 60 we identified a total 511 strongly predicted targets for miR‐122; these targets were further assessed by the PANTHER Gene Ontology database61 for the clarification of their molecular functions and involvement in biological processes and signalling pathways (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2A, many metabolic processes are potentially targeted by miR‐122, including protein metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism (glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation and tricarboxylic acid cycle), lipid metabolism and phospholipid metabolism. Many biological functions are also affected, including transmembrane transport, calcium‐dependent phospholipid binding, lipid binding and transport, and peroxidase activity etc. (Figure 2B). Signalling pathway ontology revealed several IR‐related pathways (eg insulin/IGF/AKT signalling), PI3K signalling, apoptosis, EGF receptor signalling, GPCR signalling and Ras/MAPK pathway (Figure 2C). Interestingly, inflammation ontology is also affected by miR‐122 targets, including chemokine and cytokine signalling (eg TNF receptor), interleukin signalling, Wnt signalling and cytokines.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

miR‐122 target profile reveals IR‐relevant ontologies and pathways. miR‐122 predicted targets were analysed for molecular function, biological process and associated pathways with PANTHER Gene Ontology Tool. (A) Biological process ontology includes protein metabolism (56), carbohydrate metabolism (13) and lipid metabolism (10). (B) Molecular function ontology revealed several IR‐relevant biochemical processes including transmembrane transport (27), calcium ion binding (9), GPCR activity (2), peroxidase activity (2) and lipid transporter activity (1). (C) PANTHER pathway analysis identified key signalling pathways including apoptosis signalling (8), EGFR signalling (6), GPCR signalling (11), Ras pathway (5), insulin/IGF pathway‐PKB signalling (4) and PI3 kinase pathway (4). *Indicates a general level 1 ontology in (B) and level 2 ontology in (A), all other listed ontologies are more specific terms at either level 2 in (B) or level 3 in (A). DIANA‐microT‐CDS predictions for miR‐122 are provided in Data S1. PANTHER results with ontologies and corresponding gene lists are provided in Data S2

Furthermore, we used GeneAnalytics LifeMap software, which analyses an input gene set against background genes known to be differentially expressed in all tissues, to analyse which targets are differentially expressed in which peripheral tissues.62 As shown in Figure 3, several targets were identified to be more expressed in the liver as well in several extrahepatic tissues including thyroid, pancreas, adipose, skeletal muscle and smooth muscle. Several genes differentially expressed in adipose, skeletal muscle and pancreatic tissues with metabolic functions are experimentally verified targets of miR‐122 (Table 3), further suggesting the strong possibility that miR‐122 plays critical roles in the development of IR and T2D.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

miR‐122 targets IR‐relevant genes differentially expressed in adipose, skeletal muscle and pancreas. Distribution of miR‐122 predicted targets (511 input genes) differentially expressed in various tissues and compartments was analysed via GeneAnalytics LifeMap Tool, including adipose (22), skeletal muscle (8) and pancreas (27)

Table 3.

miR‐122 targets differentially expressed in adipose, skeletal muscle and pancreas

Target Name Function
Adipose
CS Citrate synthase TCA cycle; conversion of glucose to acetyl‐CoA
IGFBP5 Insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein 5 Regulation of cell growth and metabolism by IGF
ACSS2 Acyl‐CoA synthetase short‐chain family member 2 Activation of acetate for use in lipid synthesis and energy generation; ethanol oxidation
IQGAP1a IQ motif containing GTPase‐activating protein 1 Insulin signalling via PKB/Akt pathway; MAPK/ERK signalling cascade
ALDOAa Aldolase, Fructose‐Bisphosphate A Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis
CLIC4a Chloride intracellular channel 4 Chloride channel insertion, redox regulated, possibly under oxidizing conditions
SUMF2 Sulfatase‐modifying factor 2 Sphingolipid metabolism
Skeletal muscle
GYS1a Glycogen synthase 1 Glucose metabolism; insulin‐induced glycogenesis
NOS1 Nitric oxide synthase 1 Nitric oxide synthesis from l‐arginine
SOX6a SRY‐Box 6 Transcription activator involved in Wnt and ERK signalling
ATP1A2a ATPase Na+/K+ transporting unit alpha 2 Membrane electrochemical gradient regulation; muscle electrical excitability
Pancreas
CANXa Calnexin Ca2+ binding, ER‐associated chaperone; Glycoprotein folding
KIF11a Kinesin Family Member 11 Kinesin; microtubule‐associated secretory protein transport
ATP1A2a ATPase Na+/K+ transporting unit alpha 2 Membrane electrochemical regulation; Inhibited in Ca2+ influx and insulin secretion
GPX3 Glutathione peroxidase 3 Secreted; Antioxidant (H2O2, lipid peroxides, organic hydroperoxides reduction by glutathione)

Targets that are differentially expressed (per GeneAnalytics LifeMap tool) and involved in IR‐relevant functions are listed.

a

Experimentally verified targets in DIANA‐microT‐CDS (targets verified by microarray, immunoprecipitation or qRT‐PCR).

In adipose tissue, a number of genes with relevant metabolic functions were identified, including conversion of glucose to acetyle‐CoA (CS), regulation of cell growth and metabolism by IGF (IGFBP5), insulin signalling via PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signalling (IQGAP1), glycolysis and gluconeogenesis (ALDOA), and sphingolipid metabolism (SUMF2). In skeletal muscle, additional genes with IR‐relevant functions were also identified, including glucose metabolism and insulin‐induced glycogenesis (GYS1), Wnt and ERK signalling (SOX6), and nitric oxide synthesis (NOS1). Similarly, genes relevant to insulin secretion in pancreatic tissue were identified to include calcium binding and glycoprotein folding (CANX), microtubule‐associated secretory transport via kinesins (KIF11) and membrane electrochemical regulation (ATP1A2).

3.2. miR‐122 target genes regulate IR and T2D in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue

To further evaluate miR‐122 targets that play important roles in clinical IR tissues, we analysed the relationship between miR‐122 targets and the down‐regulated genes (≥2‐fold decrease) in human IR tissues using the microarray data from 4 studies in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)63; 2 assessing skeletal muscle and 2 assessing adipose tissue (Table 4). Several miR‐122‐predicted targets are down‐regulated genes in quadriceps muscle reported by Jin et al (normoglycaemic IR subjects with parental history of T2D vs normoglycaemic non‐IR control) and Yang et al (insulin sensitive and IR from equally obese, non‐diabetic Pima Indians).64, 65 IR‐relevant genes include NaCl absorption (SLC12A1), insulin receptor kinase phosphorylation (PTPN1), IGFBP4 and IGFBP5 cleavage (PAPPA), and TGF‐β signalling (PEG10). To further examine the extent of functional association of these genes with IR, we used the GeneAnalytics VarElect software (an integrated knowledge‐based software to analyse direct and indirect phenotypic linkage with genes) and identified several miR‐122 targets (SLC12A1, PTPN1 and PAPPA) that have direct phenotypic association with T2D/IR.66 Comparing miR‐122 targets with down‐regulated genes in subcutaneous and omental adipose samples67 (insulin sensitive vs IR obese subjects) and subcutaneous adipose samples68 (insulin sensitive vs IR non‐obese subjects), we again found overlapping genes with IR‐relevant functions, including stimulation of oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptors, fat oxidation and non‐oxidative glucose metabolism (PPARGC1B), GPCR signalling and carbohydrate metabolism (GRK3), adipocyte differentiation and apoptosis inhibition (PEG10), stimulation of Wnt signalling (RSPO1), O‐linked oligosaccharide synthesis (GALNT12) and MAPK signalling (DUSP4). PPARGC1B, GPD1L and RSPO1 were found to have more direct phenotypic association with T2D/IR when assessed by VarElect. Several of the miR‐122 targets highlighted in Table 4 in both skeletal muscle and adipose tissue have been previously experimentally verified as well.

Table 4.

miR‐122 targets genes that are down‐regulated in IR skeletal muscle and adipose tissue

Target Name Function VarElect
Direct Indirect
Skeletal muscle (Quadricep, normoglycaemic IR with parental T2D history, Jin et al)
SLC12A1 Solute carrier family 12 member 1 Na/Cl absorption; ionic balance, cell volume
PTPN1a Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non‐receptor type 1 Negative regulator of insulin signalling via dephosphorylating the phosphotyrosine residues of insulin receptor kinase
ZNF101 Zinc finger protein 101 Transcription regulation
TTL Tubulin tyrosine ligase Post‐translational modification of alpha‐tubulin; ligase
MYBa MYB proto‐oncogene, transcription factor Transcriptional activator
Skeletal muscle (Quadricep, IR non‐diabetic Pima Indians, Yang et al)
PAPPAa Pappalysin 1 Metalloproteinase which specifically cleaves IGFBP‐4 and IGFBP‐5, resulting in release of bound IGF
PEG10 Paternally expressed 10 Prevents apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma; inhibits the TGF‐beta signalling by interacting with the TGF‐beta receptor ALK1
CDH6 Cadherin 6 Calcium‐dependent cell adhesion proteins; Wnt signalling
MYO9A Myosin IXA Actin‐based motor molecules with ATPase activity
ENY2 ENY2, transcription and export complex 2 subunit mRNA export coupled transcription activation
Adipose (Subcutaneous, IR obese, Hardy et al)
PPARGC1B PPARG coactivator 1 beta Stimulates activity of several transcription factors and nuclear receptors, including oestrogen receptor alpha, nuclear respiratory factor 1 and glucocorticoid receptor; may be involved in fat oxidation, non‐oxidative glucose metabolism and the regulation of energy expenditure; down‐regulated in pre‐diabetic and T2D patients
RPS6KC1 Ribosomal protein S6 kinase C1 Sphingosine‐1 phosphate (SPP)‐mediated signalling
GRK3 G‐protein‐coupled receptor kinase 3 Phosphorylates the agonist‐occupied form of the beta‐adrenergic and related GPCRs
PEG10 Paternally expressed 10 Prevents apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma; adipocyte differentiation; inhibits the TGF‐beta signalling by interacting with the TGF‐beta receptor ALK1
Adipose (Omental, IR obese, Hardy et al)
GPD1L Glycerol‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase 1‐like Catalyses conversion of sn‐glycerol 3‐phosphate to glycerone phosphate
RSPO1 R‐spondin 1 Ligand for leucine‐rich repeat‐containing G‐protein‐coupled receptors (LGR proteins) and positively regulates the Wnt signalling pathway
MYO9A Myosin IXA Actin‐based motor molecules with ATPase activity
TMTC2 Transmembrane/tetratricopeptide repeat‐containing 2 ER membrane protein; ER calcium homoeostasis
GALNT12 Polypeptide N‐acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 12 Catalyses initial step in O‐linked oligosaccharide biosynthesis
GRK3 G‐protein‐coupled receptor kinase 3 Phosphorylates the agonist‐occupied form of the beta‐adrenergic and related GPCRs; carbohydrate metabolism
Adipose (Subcutaneous, IR non‐obese, Keller et al)
DUSP4a Dual specificity phosphatase 4 Negatively regulates members of the mitogen‐activated protein (MAP) kinase superfamily (MAPK/ERK, SAPK/JNK, p38), which are associated with cellular proliferation and differentiation

Predicted miR‐122 targets were compared with down‐regulated genes (≥2 fold, P < .05) in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue samples in 4 reported microarray studies using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Targets that are more likely associated (direct or indirect) with IR‐relevant phenotypes were determined using VarElect (phenotype query: insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, lipid metabolism, type 2 diabetes, glucose metabolism, lipid storage and inflammation).

a

Experimentally verified targets (DIANA‐microT‐CDS). Lists of all overlapped genes from above 5 comparisons are available in Data S3.

4. MOLECULAR MECHANISMS TO SUPPORT THE FUNCTION OF CIRCULATING miR‐122 IN TARGET CELLS

Whether circulating miRNAs are functionally significant or simply by‐products of cell activity is still debatable; however, strong evidence for both sides of this relationship has emerged.69 Circulating miRNAs can be co‐purified with microvesicles and exosomes,70, 71 miRNA populations in exosomes are significantly different from miRNA species in their originating cells and are often associated with AGO proteins,72, 73, 74 and the treatment of cells with exosome fractions suppresses target mRNA translation.28, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 All of these results support the “cell‐to‐cell communication” theory for circulating miRNAs. Conversely, opponents have shown that miRNA‐AGO complexes are stable for prolonged periods of time in the nuclease‐rich extracellular environment after the death of parental cells80 and suggest that miRNA‐AGO complex with exosomes is simply due to the high capacity of RNA‐binding proteins81, 82 and that the concentration of miRNAs in circulation is too low to carry out a hormone‐like function on distant target cells. Both sides of this argument may be correct to a certain extent. While the majority of circulating miRNAs might be non‐specific by‐products, certain miRNAs may indeed possess hormone‐like functions under certain conditions (eg cancer and infection).

Interestingly, vesicle‐associated miRNAs are found to be the minimal portion in circulation, whereas over 90% of miRNAs in serum and plasma are vesicle free and associated with AGO2.76 As AGO2 is a critical intracellular protein in the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC), this finding indicates a drastic new possibility that AGO2 not only functions as a carrier protein for circulating miRNAs but also plays an active role in miRNA uptake and functioning in target cells. Although the mechanism underlying the secretion, circulation and uptake of AGO2‐miRNA complex remains elusive, these findings prompt us to analyse the possibility of AGO2‐mediated uptake and functioning of miR‐122 in target cells.

4.1. Thermodynamic stability of miR‐122/AGO2 complex

Among 4 AGO proteins (AGO1‐AGO4) encoded by the human genome, only AGO2 expresses mRNA cleavage activity while other AGOs (AGO1/3/4) lack cleaving activity and only mediate RNA silencing via translational repression.83 The 2 steps of forming active RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC) involves pre‐miRNA duplex association with AGO (inactive RISC) followed by the rate‐limiting step of RNA duplex cleavage to form a single‐stranded RNA associated with AGO (active RISC).84, 85

Thermodynamic stability and structure prediction for pre‐miR‐122 by mFold revealed the ΔG = −45.90 kcal/mol along with 63/70 bases paired in its stem (Figure 4A).86 Gu et al demonstrated that stable shRNA structures (ΔG < −38.5 kcal/mol) are inversely correlated with non‐cleaving AGO‐RISC activation, with very poor to no activation around ‐45.90 kcal/mol. It was also demonstrated that AGO2‐associated shRNAs in complete or near complete base pairing in the stem exhibits very robust mRNA target silencing.85 Together, miR‐122 is likely a poor candidate for AGO1/3/4‐RISC activation, hence most likely will function via AGO2‐mediated silencing. Due to this high thermodynamic stability, we believe that miR‐122 is specifically evolved for RNA silencing function through AGO2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

miR‐122 structural and thermodynamic characteristics make it an ideal candidate for AGO2‐mediated silencing. miR‐122 sequence was folded with the mFold RNA tool to assess its stem‐loop structure features and thermodynamic stability. (A) pre‐miR‐122 stem‐loop structure and thermodynamic stability. (B) miR‐122 sequence, relevant segments and nucleotide composition. (C) miR‐122 guide strand stem‐loop structure and thermodynamic stability. “hsa‐” stands for homo sapiens

Although current understanding of miRNA guide strand secondary structure formation remains limited, mFold results of miR‐122 interestingly revealed the most stable form (ΔG = −0.10 kcal/mol) to possess unpaired bases in anchor, seed, 3′ supplementary and in the later tail regions (Figure 4C). This confirmation may be ideal as it exposes only bases that are required for mRNA targeting.

Studies have also shown that miRNAs containing high percentage of adenine exhibit reduced mRNA targeting activity. It was also found that AGO2‐associated miRNAs contain less adenine nucleotides at their 3′‐end when compared to miRNAs extracted from the whole cell.87 Consistent with this rule, we noticed that miR‐122 contains more G (40.91%) and U (36.36%) bases than A bases (18.18%) in the regions outside of the 3′‐end, further supporting miR‐122 as a strong candidate for functioning through AGO2 (Figure 4B).

4.2. 3′ End importance: protection from nuclease digestion

Increasing studies indicate the importance of nucleotide composition at the 3′‐end of miRNAs. Although miRNAs become more stable when bound with RISC, they are still susceptible to nuclease degradation via miRNA 3′ trimming, wherein the 3′‐end nucleotides are removed by cellular nucleases while bound to the PAZ domain of AGO proteins. This trimming process is only for AGO2‐bound miRNA but not for non‐cleaving AGO1/3/4‐associated miRNAs, suggesting a potential bias for AGO proteins towards certain nucleotide sequences.88, 89 miRNA with 3′‐end adenine nucleotides shows weak interaction with PAZ domain, whereas this interaction becomes stabilized when U/G/C nucleotides (U>G>C>A) are present at the 3′‐end.89, 90 As miR‐122's 3′‐end nucleotide is G and all 6 nucleotides in the 3′ tail are U or G, miR‐122 likely exhibits strong binding to the AGO2 PAZ domain, thus protecting it from cellular nuclease cleavage (Figure 4B).

Several studies have identified a new phenomenon for miRNA sorting: 3′‐end adenylated miRNAs are enriched in cells while 3′‐end uridylated miRNAs tend to be enriched in extracellular microvesicles.91 The discovery of specific miRNA 3′‐end sequence motifs (EXOmotifs) favours the loading into exosomes through the interaction with nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1 (hnRNPA2B1).92 However, miR‐122 does not meet these criteria with 3′‐end guanine and the lack of identified EXOmotifs. Therefore, other unknown mechanism(s) may be involved in the loading of miR‐122 into exosomes. As mentioned above, miR‐122 may simply form a complex with AGO2 instead of exosome packaging for efficient circulation.

4.3. Can AGO2 mediate miR‐122 uptake in target cells?

By the time miRNA‐AGO2 complex reaches target cells, there is another critical step for miRNA uptake. So far, there are no studies addressing this issue; it is not known whether AGO2 can mediate miRNA uptake or induce an endocytosis process. However, there is research reporting that AGO2 is localized on rough ER membrane and can bind to miRNA to cause its release from ER to target cellular mRNA.93 In addition, another study also identified the association of AGO2 with plasma membrane in NK cells,94 suggesting that AGO2 might have a potential membrane function to assist miR‐122 uptake by target cells. AGO2 might also be able to interact with other endocytosis complex protein(s) to facilitate miR‐122 uptake. This is an untested but significant topic that warrants further investigation.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Through systematic literature review and comprehensive bioinformatic analysis, we identify a group of circulating miRNAs with strong potential in regulating the development of insulin resistance and diabetes‐associated HCV infection. These miRNAs are revealed by a new idea to analyse the functional overlap between HCV‐derived and IR/diabetes‐related miRNAs. By integrated analyses using DIANA‐microT, PANTHER Gene Ontology Tool, GeneAnalytics LifeMap Tool, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and VarElect, miR‐122 is uncovered as the most relevant miRNA in linking HCV infection to IR/diabetes. The effects of miR‐122 on target mRNAs in insulin effector tissues are partially supported by experimental data at basic and pre‐clinical levels. The broader coverage of bioinformatic analysis than experimental research is certainly reasonable, which also provides us with more targets for further studies. The overall view of the regulatory functions of miR‐122 on the development of IR/diabetes by HCV infection is summarized in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Working model for hepatic and circulating miR‐122 to mediate IR and diabetes associated with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Key metabolic and cell signalling pathways impacted are illustrated, summarizing the findings from literature review and bioinformatics analyses in this study

The feasibility of regulating these broad mRNAs by miR‐122 is also analysed de novo by several bioinformatic methods, thus providing the biochemical and cell biology basis for the functioning of miR‐122 in extrahepatic tissues. Our viewpoint regarding the “hormonal” function of miR‐122 is supported by a recent study that obese mice adipose tissue macrophage‐derived exosome can cause systemic insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in lean mice, wherein miR‐155 is the causative factor.95 This study also suggests that other miRNAs identified in Table 2 may exert functions in the association of HCV infection with IR and diabetes. Interestingly, miR‐155 is exactly on the list as one candidate in Table 2. miRNAs identified from this analytical review will be experimentally verified as our ongoing research project. In summary, the information and ideas from this review shed new light on our understanding about the development of IR and diabetes associated with HCV infection from a different angle through non‐coding RNA, thus providing us a new strategy for drug development to treat HCV infection‐associated extrahepatic diseases and complications.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This study is partially supported by the start‐up funds to JL and the summer research scholarship to AS from Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine.

Singhal A, Agrawal A, Ling J. Regulation of insulin resistance and type II diabetes by hepatitis C virus infection: A driver function of circulating miRNAs. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:2071–2085. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13553

REFERENCES

  • 1. Hum J, Jou JH, Green PK, et al. Improvement in glycemic control of type 2 diabetes after successful treatment of hepatitis C virus. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1173‐1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Desbois AC, Cacoub P. Diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and hepatitis C virus infection: a contemporary review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:1697‐1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gastaldi G, Goossens N, Clément S, Negro F. Current level of evidence on causal association between hepatitis C virus and type 2 diabetes: a review. J Adv Res. 2017;8:149‐159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kawaguchi Y, Mizuta T. Interaction between hepatitis C virus and metabolic factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:2888‐2901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Modaresi Esfeh J, Ansari‐Gilani K. Steatosis and hepatitis C. Gastroenterol Rep. 2016;4:24‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. White DL, Ratziu V, El‐Serag HB. Hepatitis C infection and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Hepatol. 2008;49:831‐844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vanni E, Abate ML, Gentilcore E, et al. Sites and mechanisms of insulin resistance in nonobese, nondiabetic patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2009;50:697‐706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Milner KL, van der Poorten D, Trenell M, et al. Chronic hepatitis C is associated with peripheral rather than hepatic insulin resistance. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:932‐941.e1‐3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Konrad T, Zeuzem S, Vicini P, et al. Evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in patients with HCV infection before and after 4 months therapy with interferon‐alpha. Eur J Clin Invest. 2000;30:111‐121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Romero‐Gómez M, Del Mar Viloria M, Andrade RJ, et al. Insulin resistance impairs sustained response rate to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:636‐641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cua IH, Hui JM, Bandara P, et al. Insulin resistance and liver injury in hepatitis C is not associated with virus‐specific changes in adipocytokines. Hepatology. 2007;46:66‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Shintani Y, Fujie H, Miyoshi H, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes: direct involvement of the virus in the development of insulin resistance. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:840‐848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hung CH, Lee CM, Chen CH, et al. Association of inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory cytokines with insulin resistance in chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2009;29:1086‐1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lecube A, Hernández C, Genescà J, Simó R. Proinflammatory cytokines, insulin resistance, and insulin secretion in chronic hepatitis C patients: a case‐control study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1096‐1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Knobler H, Zhornicky T, Sandler A, Haran N, Ashur Y, Schattner A. Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha‐induced insulin resistance may mediate the hepatitis C virus‐diabetes association. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2751‐2756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Aytug S, Reich D, Sapiro LE, Bernstein D, Begum N. Impaired IRS‐1/PI3‐kinase signaling in patients with HCV: a mechanism for increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Hepatology. 2003;38:1384‐1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Banerjee S, Saito K, Ait‐Goughoulte M, Meyer K, Ray RB, Ray R. Hepatitis C virus core protein upregulates serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate‐1 and impairs the downstream akt/protein kinase B signaling pathway for insulin resistance. J Virol. 2008;82:2606‐2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pazienza V, Clément S, Pugnale P, et al. The hepatitis C virus core protein of genotypes 3a and 1b downregulates insulin receptor substrate 1 through genotype‐specific mechanisms. Hepatology. 2007;45:1164‐1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kasai D, Adachi T, Deng L, et al. HCV replication suppresses cellular glucose uptake through down‐regulation of cell surface expression of glucose transporters. J Hepatol. 2009;50:883‐894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kawaguchi T, Yoshida T, Harada M, et al. Hepatitis C virus down‐regulates insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 through up‐regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:1499‐1508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pascarella S, Clement S, Guilloux K, Conzelmann S, Penin F, Negro F. Effects of hepatitis C virus on suppressor of cytokine signaling mRNA levels: comparison between different genotypes and core protein sequence analysis. J Med Virol. 2011;83:1005‐1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Romero‐Gomez M. Insulin resistance and hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:7075‐7080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Christen V, Treves S, Duong FH, Heim MH. Activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress response by hepatitis viruses up‐regulates protein phosphatase 2A. Hepatology. 2007;46:558‐565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cai Y, Yu X, Hu S, Yu J. A brief review on the mechanisms of miRNA regulation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2009;7:147‐154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008;18:997‐1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Etheridge A, Lee I, Hood L, Galas D, Wang K. Extracellular microRNA: a new source of biomarkers. Mutat Res. 2011;717:85‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Guay C, Regazzi R. Circulating microRNAs as novel biomarkers for diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:513‐521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhou W, Fong MY, Min Y, et al. Cancer‐secreted miR‐105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:501‐515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Creemers EE, Tijsen AJ, Pinto YM. Circulating microRNAs: novel biomarkers and extracellular communicators in cardiovascular disease? Circ Res. 2012;110:483‐495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Liu X, Wang T, Wakita T, Yang W. Systematic identification of microRNA and messenger RNA profiles in hepatitis C virus‐infected human hepatoma cells. Virology. 2010;398:57‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li H, Jiang JD, Peng ZG. MicroRNA‐mediated interactions between host and hepatitis C virus. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1487‐1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zhang X, Daucher M, Armistead D, Russell R, Kottilil S. MicroRNA expression profiling in HCV‐infected human hepatoma cells identifies potential anti‐viral targets induced by interferon‐α. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ishida H, Tatsumi T, Hosui A, et al. Alterations in microRNA expression profile in HCV‐infected hepatoma cells: involvement of miR‐491 in regulation of HCV replication via the PI3 kinase/Akt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;412:92‐97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ura S, Honda M, Yamashita T, et al. Differential microRNA expression between hepatitis B and hepatitis C leading disease progression to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009;49:1098‐1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Varnholt H, Drebber U, Schulze F, et al. MicroRNA gene expression profile of hepatitis C virus‐associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008;47:1223‐1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Trebicka J, Anadol E, Elfimova N, et al. Hepatic and serum levels of miR‐122 after chronic HCV‐induced fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2013;58:234‐239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cheung O, Puri P, Eicken C, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with altered hepatic MicroRNA expression. Hepatology. 2008;48:1810‐1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Xu J, Zhu X, Wu L, et al. MicroRNA‐122 suppresses cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by directly targeting Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. Liver Int. 2012;32:752‐760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Morita K, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, et al. Clinical significance and potential of hepatic microRNA‐122 expression in hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2011;31:474‐484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Esau C, Davis S, Murray SF, et al. miR‐122 regulation of lipid metabolism revealed by in vivo antisense targeting. Cell Metab. 2006;3:87‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Anadol E, Schierwagen R, Elfimova N, et al. Circulating microRNAs as a marker for liver injury in human immunodeficiency virus patients. Hepatology. 2015;61:46‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jansen C, Reiberger T, Huang J, et al. Circulating miRNA‐122 levels are associated with hepatic necroinflammation and portal hypertension in HIV/HCV coinfection. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Murray DD, Suzuki K, Law M, et al. Circulating miR‐122 and miR‐200a as biomarkers for fatal liver disease in ART‐treated, HIV‐1‐infected individuals. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Murray DD, Suzuki K, Law M, et al. Circulating microRNAs in sera correlate with soluble biomarkers of Immune activation but do not predict mortality in ART treated individuals with HIV‐1 infection: a case control study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bhanja Chowdhury J, Shrivastava S, Steele R, Di Bisceglie AM, Ray R, Ray RB. Hepatitis C virus infection modulates expression of interferon stimulatory gene IFITM1 by upregulating miR‐130A. J Virol. 2012;86:10221‐10225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chen Y, Chen J, Wang H, et al. HCV‐induced miR‐21 contributes to evasion of host immune system by targeting MyD88 and IRAK1. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P. Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver‐specific MicroRNA. Science. 2005;309:1577‐1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Janssen HL, Reesink HW, Lawitz EJ, et al. Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1685‐1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhang Y, Wei W, Cheng N, et al. Hepatitis C virus‐induced up‐regulation of microRNA‐155 promotes hepatocarcinogenesis by activating Wnt signaling. Hepatology. 2012;56:1631‐1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hou W, Tian Q, Zheng J, Bonkovsky HL. MicroRNA‐196 represses Bach1 protein and hepatitis C virus gene expression in human hepatoma cells expressing hepatitis C viral proteins. Hepatology. 2010;51:1494‐1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Zhang X, Liu S, Hu T, He Y, Sun S. Up‐regulated microRNA‐143 transcribed by nuclear factor kappa B enhances hepatocarcinoma metastasis by repressing fibronectin expression. Hepatology. 2009;50:490‐499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Shirasaki T, Honda M, Shimakami T, et al. MicroRNA‐27a regulates lipid metabolism and inhibits hepatitis C virus replication in human hepatoma cells. J Virol. 2013;87:5270‐5286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Elmén J, Lindow M, Schütz S, et al. LNA‐mediated microRNA silencing in non‐human primates. Nature. 2008;452:896‐899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kong L, Zhu J, Han W, et al. Significance of serum microRNAs in pre‐diabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a clinical study. Acta Diabetol. 2011;48:61‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Klöting N, Berthold S, Kovacs P, et al. MicroRNA expression in human omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bian Z, Li LM, Tang R, et al. Identification of mouse liver mitochondria‐associated miRNAs and their potential biological functions. Cell Res. 2010;20:1076‐1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Shwetha S, Gouthamchandra K, Chandra M, Ravishankar B, Khaja MN, Das S. Circulating miRNA profile in HCV infected serum: novel insight into pathogenesis. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cermelli S, Ruggieri A, Marrero JA, Ioannou GN, Beretta L. Circulating microRNAs in patients with chronic hepatitis C and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Paraskevopoulou MD, Georgakilas G, Kostoulas N, et al. DIANA‐microT web server v5.0: service integration into miRNA functional analysis workflows. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W169‐W173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Reczko M, Maragkakis M, Alexiou P, Grosse I, Hatzigeorgiou AG. Functional microRNA targets in protein coding sequences. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:771‐776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Mi H, Huang X, Muruganujan A, et al. PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D183‐D189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Edgar R, Mazor Y, Rinon A, et al. LifeMap Discovery™: the embryonic development, stem cells, and regenerative medicine research portal. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D991‐D995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Jin W, Goldfine AB, Boes T, et al. Increased SRF transcriptional activity in human and mouse skeletal muscle is a signature of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:918‐929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Yang X, Pratley RE, Tokraks S, Bogardus C, Permana PA. Microarray profiling of skeletal muscle tissues from equally obese, non‐diabetic insulin‐sensitive and insulin‐resistant Pima Indians. Diabetologia. 2002;45:1584‐1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Stelzer G, Plaschkes I, Oz‐Levi D, et al. VarElect: the phenotype‐based variation prioritizer of the GeneCards Suite. BMC Genom. 2016;17(Suppl 2):444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Hardy OT, Perugini RA, Nicoloro SM, et al. Body mass index‐independent inflammation in omental adipose tissue associated with insulin resistance in morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:60‐67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Keller P, Gburcik V, Petrovic N, et al. Gene‐chip studies of adipogenesis‐regulated microRNAs in mouse primary adipocytes and human obesity. BMC Endocr Disord. 2011;11:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Turchinovich A, Tonevitsky AG, Burwinkel B. Extracellular miRNA: a collision of two paradigms. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41:883‐892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome‐mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654‐659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Hunter MP, Ismail N, Zhang X, et al. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Gibbings DJ, Ciaudo C, Erhardt M, Voinnet O. Multivesicular bodies associate with components of miRNA effector complexes and modulate miRNA activity. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1143‐1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Guduric‐Fuchs J, O'Connor A, Camp B, O'Neill CL, Medina RJ, Simpson DA. Selective extracellular vesicle‐mediated export of an overlapping set of microRNAs from multiple cell types. BMC Genom. 2012;13:357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM, et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5003‐5008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Katakowski M, Buller B, Wang X, Rogers T, Chopp M. Functional microRNA is transferred between glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8259‐8263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Okoye IS, Coomes SM, Pelly VS, et al. MicroRNA‐containing T‐regulatory‐cell‐derived exosomes suppress pathogenic T helper 1 cells. Immunity. 2014;41:89‐103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Bang C, Batkai S, Dangwal S, et al. Cardiac fibroblast‐derived microRNA passenger strand‐enriched exosomes mediate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2136‐2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Aucher A, Rudnicka D, Davis DM. MicroRNAs transfer from human macrophages to hepato‐carcinoma cells and inhibit proliferation. J Immunol. 2013;191:6250‐6260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Alexander M, Hu R, Runtsch MC, et al. Exosome‐delivered microRNAs modulate the inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Turchinovich A, Burwinkel B. Distinct AGO1 and AGO2 associated miRNA profiles in human cells and blood plasma. RNA Biol. 2012;9:1066‐1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Agapov II, Tonevitsky AG, Shamshiev AT, et al. The role of structural domains in RIP II toxin model membrane binding. FEBS Lett. 1997;402:91‐93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Pohl P, Antonenko YN, Evtodienko VY, et al. Membrane fusion mediated by ricin and viscumin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1371:11‐16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Meister G, Landthaler M, Patkaniowska A, Dorsett Y, Teng G, Tuschl T. Human Argonaute2 mediates RNA cleavage targeted by miRNAs and siRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004;15:185‐197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Yoda M, Kawamata T, Paroo Z, et al. ATP‐dependent human RISC assembly pathways. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:17‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Gu S, Jin L, Zhang F, et al. Thermodynamic stability of small hairpin RNAs highly influences the loading process of different mammalian Argonautes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:9208‐9213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3406‐3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Burroughs AM, Ando Y, de Hoon MJ, et al. A comprehensive survey of 3′ animal miRNA modification events and a possible role for 3′ adenylation in modulating miRNA targeting effectiveness. Genome Res. 2010;20:1398‐1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Ho T, Wang L, Huang L, et al. Nucleotide bias of DCL and AGO in plant anti‐virus gene silencing. Protein Cell. 2010;1:847‐858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Kandeel M, Al‐Taher A, Nakashima R, et al. Bioenergetics and gene silencing approaches for unraveling nucleotide recognition by the human EIF2C2/Ago2 PAZ domain. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Juvvuna PK, Khandelia P, Lee LM, Makeyev EV. Argonaute identity defines the length of mature mammalian microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:6808‐6820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Koppers‐Lalic D, Hackenberg M, Bijnsdorp IV, et al. Nontemplated nucleotide additions distinguish the small RNA composition in cells from exosomes. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1649‐1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Villarroya‐Beltri C, Gutiérrez‐Vázquez C, Sánchez‐Cabo F, et al. Sumoylated hnRNPA2B1 controls the sorting of miRNAs into exosomes through binding to specific motifs. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Barman B, Bhattacharyya SN. mRNA targeting to endoplasmic reticulum precedes ago protein interaction and MicroRNA (miRNA)‐mediated translation repression in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:24650‐24656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Ghosh D, Lippert D, Krokhin O, Cortens JP, Wilkins JA. Defining the membrane proteome of NK cells. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45:1‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Ying W, Riopel M, Bandyopadhyay G, et al. Adipose tissue macrophage‐derived exosomal miRNAs can modulate in vivo and in vitro insulin sensitivity. Cell. 2017;171:372‐384.e12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Lanford RE, Hildebrandt‐Eriksen ES, Petri A, et al. Therapeutic silencing of microRNA‐122 in primates with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Science. 2010;327:198‐201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Henke JI, Goergen D, Zheng J, et al. microRNA‐122 stimulates translation of hepatitis C virus RNA. EMBO J. 2008;27:3300‐3310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Jopling CL, Schütz S, Sarnow P. Position‐dependent function for a tandem microRNA miR‐122‐binding site located in the hepatitis C virus RNA genome. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4:77‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Randall G, Panis M, Cooper JD, et al. Cellular cofactors affecting hepatitis C virus infection and replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:12884‐12889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Roberts AP, Lewis AP, Jopling CL. miR‐122 activates hepatitis C virus translation by a specialized mechanism requiring particular RNA components. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:7716‐7729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Shimakami T, Yamane D, Jangra RK, et al. Stabilization of hepatitis C virus RNA by an Ago2‐miR‐122 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:941‐946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Li Y, Masaki T, Yamane D, McGivern DR, Lemon SM. Competing and noncompeting activities of miR‐122 and the 5′ exonuclease Xrn1 in regulation of hepatitis C virus replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:1881‐1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Hou W, Bukong TN, Kodys K, Szabo G. Alcohol facilitates HCV RNA replication via up‐regulation of miR‐122 expression and inhibition of cyclin G1 in human hepatoma cells. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:599‐608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Yoshikawa T, Takata A, Otsuka M, et al. Silencing of microRNA‐122 enhances interferon‐α signaling in the liver through regulating SOCS3 promoter methylation. Sci Rep. 2012;2:637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Pedersen IM, Cheng G, Wieland S, et al. Interferon modulation of cellular microRNAs as an antiviral mechanism. Nature. 2007;449:919‐922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Murakami Y, Aly HH, Tajima A, Inoue I, Shimotohno K. Regulation of the hepatitis C virus genome replication by miR‐199a. J Hepatol. 2009;50:453‐460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Bandyopadhyay S, Friedman RC, Marquez RT, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and hepatic stellate cell activation downregulate miR‐29: miR‐29 overexpression reduces hepatitis C viral abundance in culture. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1753‐1762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Sarma NJ, Tiriveedhi V, Subramanian V, et al. Hepatitis C virus mediated changes in miRNA‐449a modulates inflammatory biomarker YKL40 through components of the NOTCH signaling pathway. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Marquez RT, Bandyopadhyay S, Wendlandt EB, et al. Correlation between microRNA expression levels and clinical parameters associated with chronic hepatitis C viral infection in humans. Lab Invest. 2010;90:1727‐1736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Banaudha K, Kaliszewski M, Korolnek T, et al. MicroRNA silencing of tumor suppressor DLC‐1 promotes efficient hepatitis C virus replication in primary human hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2011;53:53‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Braconi C, Valeri N, Gasparini P, et al. Hepatitis C virus proteins modulate microRNA expression and chemosensitivity in malignant hepatocytes. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:957‐966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Ghoneim E, Abed El‐Aziz A, Abd El‐Mottaleb T, El‐Hendawy G, El‐Ezawy H, Khalil F. Profiling of microRNA‐122 in chronic hepatitis C. Menoufia Med J. 2016;29:826‐834. [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Butt AM, Raja AJ, Siddique S, et al. Parallel expression profiling of hepatic and serum microRNA‐122 associated with clinical features and treatment responses in chronic hepatitis C patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Wang JH, Jiang D, Rao HY, Zhao JM, Wang Y, Wei L. Absolute quantification of serum microRNA‐122 and its correlation with liver inflammation grade and serum alanine aminotransferase in chronic hepatitis C patients. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;30:52‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Su TH, Liu CH, Liu CJ, et al. Serum microRNA‐122 level correlates with virologic responses to pegylated interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:7844‐7849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Bihrer V, Friedrich‐Rust M, Kronenberger B, et al. Serum miR‐122 as a biomarker of necroinflammation in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1663‐1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Bala S, Tilahun Y, Taha O, et al. Increased microRNA‐155 expression in the serum and peripheral monocytes in chronic HCV infection. J Transl Med. 2012;10:151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. van der Meer AJ, Farid WR, Sonneveld MJ, et al. Sensitive detection of hepatocellular injury in chronic hepatitis C patients with circulating hepatocyte‐derived microRNA‐122. J Viral Hepat. 2013;20:158‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Zhang S, Ouyang X, Jiang X, et al. Dysregulated serum MicroRNA expression profile and potential biomarkers in hepatitis C virus‐infected patients. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:590‐598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. El‐Diwany R, Wasilewski LN, Witwer KW, et al. Acute hepatitis C virus infection induces consistent changes in circulating MicroRNAs that are associated with nonlytic hepatocyte release. J Virol. 2015;89:9454‐9464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Shrivastava S, Petrone J, Steele R, Lauer GM, Di Bisceglie AM, Ray RB. Up‐regulation of circulating miR‐20a is correlated with hepatitis C virus‐mediated liver disease progression. Hepatology. 2013;58:863‐871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Xu G, Yang F, Ding CL, et al. MiR‐221 accentuates IFNs anti‐HCV effect by downregulating SOCS1 and SOCS3. Virology. 2014;462‐463:343‐350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Elhelw DS, Mekky RY, El‐Ekiaby N, et al. Predictive prognostic role of miR‐181a with discrepancy in the liver and serum of genotype 4 hepatitis C virus patients. Biomed Rep. 2014;2:843‐848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Motawi TK, Shaker OG, El‐Maraghy SA, Senousy MA. Serum interferon‐related microRNAs as biomarkers to predict the response to interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Yang Z, Chen H, Si H, et al. Serum miR‐23a, a potential biomarker for diagnosis of pre‐diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51:823‐831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Ortega FJ, Mercader JM, Moreno‐Navarrete JM, et al. Profiling of circulating microRNAs reveals common microRNAs linked to type 2 diabetes that change with insulin sensitization. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1375‐1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Seyhan AA, Nunez Lopez YO, Xie H, et al. Pancreas‐enriched miRNAs are altered in the circulation of subjects with diabetes: a pilot cross‐sectional study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Wang C, Wan S, Yang T, et al. Increased serum microRNAs are closely associated with the presence of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Li MY, Pan SR, Qiu AY. Roles of microRNA‐221/222 in type 2 diabetic patients with post‐menopausal breast cancer. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(2). https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15027259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Zhou B, Li C, Qi W, et al. Downregulation of miR‐181a upregulates sirtuin‐1 (SIRT1) and improves hepatic insulin sensitivity. Diabetologia. 2012;55:2032‐2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Baldeon RL, Weigelt K, de Wit H, et al. Decreased serum level of miR‐146a as sign of chronic inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Rong Y, Bao W, Shan Z, et al. Increased microRNA‐146a levels in plasma of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Shah R, Murthy V, Pacold M, et al. Extracellular RNAs are associated with insulin resistance and metabolic phenotypes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:546‐553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Wang R, Hong J, Cao Y, et al. Elevated circulating microRNA‐122 is associated with obesity and insulin resistance in young adults. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:291‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Willeit P, Skroblin P, Moschen AR, et al. Circulating MicroRNA‐122 is associated with the risk of new‐onset metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2017;66:347‐357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

 

 


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES