Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2018 Jan 12;142(10):2019–2027. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31241

Atopic allergic conditions and pancreatic cancer risk: results from the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Brian Z Huang 1,2, Loic Le Marchand 3, Christopher A Haiman 4,5, Kristine R Monroe 4, Lynne R Wilkens 3, Zuo-Feng Zhang 1, Veronica Wendy Setiawan 4,5
PMCID: PMC5867237  NIHMSID: NIHMS933025  PMID: 29314003

Abstract

Previous case-control studies have suggested that atopic allergic conditions (AACs) are inversely associated with pancreatic cancer, but this relationship has not been supported in many prospective settings. In this study, we investigated the influence of AACs (asthma, hay fever, or allergy) and the treatment of these conditions on pancreatic cancer risk among participants of the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC). AACs and antihistamine use were assessed via a baseline questionnaire when participants joined the MEC in 1993–1996. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pancreatic cancer incidence by AACs and antihistamines were calculated using Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking status, family history of pancreatic cancer, body mass index, diabetes, and alcohol intake. We further evaluated associations among subgroups defined by age, sex, ethnicity, follow-up time and known pancreatic cancer risk factors. During an average 16-year follow-up, 1,455 incident cases of pancreatic cancer were identified among 187,226 white, African American, Latino, Japanese American and Native Hawaiian men and women. AACs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88–1.12) and antihistamines (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78–1.07) were not clearly associated with pancreatic cancer incidence. While these associations were also null for most subgroups, we did observe protective associations of AACs (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98) and antihistamines (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.96) among the oldest participants (70+). Our results, in agreement with past prospective studies, suggest that AACs are not associated with pancreatic cancer in general, but the observed protective associations among the oldest age group may warrant future investigation.

Keywords: allergies, atopic allergic conditions, antihistamines, pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is considered one of the most lethal cancers in the United States. It is presently the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and is projected to become the second most common cancer death by 2030.1,2 Despite improvements in survival over the past decades, its current 5-year survival rate of 8% is still the lowest among all cancers.1 In light of these poor outcomes, more efforts are needed to understand the etiology and to combat the burden of this disease.

As pancreatic cancer has been related to inflammation,3 the role of the immune system in this malignancy has been of major interest in epidemiologic research. Specifically, researchers have evaluated the influence of atopic allergic conditions (AACs) on pancreatic cancer in a number of retrospective studies.4,5 In a recent meta-analysis of fourteen case-control studies with a total of 5,550 cases, summary estimates revealed inverse associations for history of asthma, nasal allergies and skin allergies with pancreatic cancer risk.4 While most of the individual studies in the meta-analysis showed reduced risks for nasal allergies, there was less agreement across the studies for skin allergies and asthma.4 Asthma has also been assessed in several registry-based retrospective cohorts from Finland and Sweden, which also have yielded conflicting results.68

In contrast, there has been a scarcity of prospective evidence regarding this relationship. To date, there have only been four prospective cohorts examining AACs and pancreatic cancer, all of which have had findings inconsistent with those of the case-control studies.912 Three out of the four cohorts observed null associations between pancreatic cancer and conditions such as asthma, hay fever, and dermal reactions,911 while the fourth cohort study observed an increased risk for asthma but a null association for skin allergies.12 These four cohorts, however, were conducted in mainly Caucasian populations. The two larger cohorts were also conducted among special populations of 34,000 Seventh-Day Adventists and 29,000 male smokers from Finland.10,12 Moreover, none of these cohorts evaluated whether allergy-treating medications were related to pancreatic cancer incidence.

Given the current literature, the influence of AACs and the treatment for such conditions on pancreatic cancer risk has not been prospectively investigated in a large heterogeneous population or within particular ethnic groups. The objective of our current study was to fill this gap in knowledge by assessing these relationships among white, African American, Latino, Japanese American and Native Hawaiian men and women of the prospective Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC). Further, we sought to evaluate whether the impact of AACs and allergy medications varied across individuals with and without known pancreatic cancer risk factors.

METHODS

Study population

The Multiethnic Cohort Study was established in 1993–1996 to study cancer and chronic disease etiology among individuals living in California (mostly Los Angeles County) and Hawaii. It consists of roughly 215,000 participants ages 45–75 of five primary ethnic groups: white, African American, Latino, Japanese American and Native Hawaiian.13 Upon enrollment, cohort members completed a 26-page baseline questionnaire, which included questions on demographics, lifestyle factors, personal medical conditions and family history of cancer.

Cohort members were excluded if they were not in the five main ethnic groups, had a previous history of pancreatic cancer prior to cohort entry, or were missing information on AAC status and pancreatic cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking, diabetes). The present study follows individuals from the date of the baseline questionnaire to pancreatic cancer diagnosis, death, or the closure date of follow-up on December 31, 2012. Incident, invasive pancreatic cancer cases were identified by annual linkage with the statewide Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries of Hawaii and California. Mortality information was obtained through linkage with states’ death certificate files and the National Death Index.

Exposure Assessment

Participants were asked to self-report on the baseline questionnaire whether a physician had ever informed them that they had “asthma, hay fever, skin allergy, food allergy or any other allergy,” asked as a single combined exposure on the baseline questionnaire. In addition, participants were asked whether they had used any antihistamine medications (“allergy pills or shots”) for “at least two times per week for one month or longer” and the duration at which they used these medications.

History of AACs was assessed as a binary exposure. Antihistamine medication was analyzed as ever use and duration of use (none, ≤5 years, >5 years). We also combined these exposures to create an index of allergy severity (no AACs, AACs with no medication use, AACs with medication use).

Statistical Analyses

Baseline characteristics were compared across individuals with and without AACs using a t-test for age and chi-square tests for all other variables. Pancreatic cancer incidence rates, truncated to ages 45–95, were computed within the MEC, age standardized by 5-year age groups to the United States Census 2000 standard population.

The influence of AACs and antihistamine use on pancreatic cancer incidence was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with time since baseline as the time metric. We used separate models to evaluate the associations between each of our exposures of interest (history of AACs, ever use of antihistamine, duration of antihistamine use, and allergy severity) and pancreatic cancer. We fit minimally adjusted models that included age at cohort entry, sex, and race/ethnicity (white, African American, Latino, Japanese American, Native Hawaiian) as strata variables, as well as fully adjusted models that also included smoking status (never, past, current), family history of pancreatic cancer, diabetes, education (≤12 years, some college/vocational, college graduate), alcohol intake (none, <24, 24–48, >48 g/day), and body mass index (BMI) (<25, 25–30, ≥30 kg/m2) as covariates. We also ran models with continuous measurements for alcohol intake and BMI and observed no change in the results; thus only findings from models with categorical groupings for these variables are presented. Individuals were censored at death or end of follow-up.

To assess effect modification of the associations of AACs or ever use of antihistamine medication on pancreatic cancer, we ran additional models among subgroups defined by age group (<50, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70+), sex, ethnicity, follow-up time since baseline (<5 years, ≥5 years), and known/potential pancreatic cancer risk factors (cigarette smoking, family history of pancreatic cancer, diabetes, alcohol use, BMI). We tested for heterogeneity by fitting a separate model with a cross-product term for the exposure (history of AACs or ever use of antihistamine medication) and the stratifying variable. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals while model fit was evaluated using Martingale and deviance residuals.14 All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.3 (Cary, NC) and reported P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

After exclusions, the present study consisted of 187,226 total individuals (females N=101,845, males N=85,381). The mean age at cohort entry was 59.9 (standard deviation 8.8). Japanese American (28.7%), whites (25.0%), and Latinos (22.2%) were the most represented ethnicity groups, followed by African Americans (16.8%) and Native Hawaiians (7.3%). During an average follow-up period of 16.2 years, 1,455 incident cases were identified among participants at risk.

Roughly one quarter of individuals reported a history of AACs (N=49,696, 26.5%). Age-standardized pancreatic cancer incidence rates (left truncated at age 45) were lower in those with AACs (44.8 cases per 100,000) than in those without AACs (50.2 cases per 100,000) (Table 1). Demographic characteristics and risk factors differed across individuals with and without AACs. Those who reported having AACs tended to be younger, female, and white and were more likely to have a family history of pancreatic cancer and more years of education. Additionally, these individuals were less commonly diabetics, current smokers, or heavy alcohol drinkers (Table 1). Antihistamine medication use was reported in 28,413 (15.2%) participants. Among these individuals, 15,405 (54.2%) used antihistamines for five or less years. In regards to allergy severity, 15.0% of participants reported having AACs without antihistamine use and 10.7% reported a history of both AACs and medication use (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of Multiethnic Cohort Study participants from 1993–2012, stratified by atopic allergic conditions (AAC) status

Characteristic Total
(N=187,226)
No AACs
(N=137,530)
AACs
(N=49,696)
p1
N % N % N %
Pancreatic cancer cases 1,455 0.8 1,094 0.8 361 0.7
Follow-up time (years)2 16.2 (4.7) 16.1 (4.8) 16.5 (4.5)
Pancreatic cancer incidence rate3 49.0 50.2 44.8
Age at baseline (years)2 59.9 (8.8) 60.2 (8.8) 58.8 (8.9) <0.0001
Age group at baseline (years) <0.0001
 <50 31,454 16.8 21,439 15.6 10,015 20.2
 50–54 28,050 15.0 19,853 14.4 8,197 16.5
 55–59 29,875 16.0 21,830 15.9 8,045 16.2
 60–64 32,245 17.2 24,068 17.5 8,177 16.5
 65–69 32,885 17.6 25,093 18.2 7,792 15.7
 70+ 32,717 17.5 25,247 18.4 7,470 15.0
Sex <0.0001
 Male 85,381 45.6 67,962 49.4 17,419 35.1
 Female 101,845 54.4 69,568 50.6 32,277 64.9
Ethnicity <0.0001
 White 46,858 25.0 32,245 23.4 14,613 29.4
 African American 31,500 16.8 23,252 16.9 8,248 16.6
 Latino 41,547 22.2 32,876 23.9 8,671 17.4
 Japanese American 53,746 28.7 39,484 28.7 14,262 28.7
 Native Hawaiian 13,575 7.3 9,673 7.0 3,902 7.9
Family history of pancreatic cancer 3,193 1.7 2,197 1.6 996 2.0 <0.0001
Diabetes 21,997 11.7 16,773 12.2 5,224 10.5 <0.0001
Body mass index (kg/m2) <0.0001
 <25 77,887 41.6 56,562 41.1 21,325 42.9
 25–30 71,887 38.4 54,141 39.4 17,746 35.7
 ≥30 37,452 20.0 26,827 19.5 10,625 21.4
Smoking status <0.0001
 Never 82,113 43.9 59,630 43.4 22,483 45.2
 Past 75,100 40.1 54,685 39.8 20,415 41.1
 Current 30,013 16.0 23,215 16.9 6,798 13.7
Education <0.0001
 ≤12 years 81,972 43.8 64,784 47.1 17,188 34.6
 Some college/vocational 55,406 29.6 39,211 28.5 16,195 32.6
 College graduate 49,848 26.6 33,535 24.4 16,313 32.8
Alcohol intake (g/day)4 <0.0001
 None 95,609 51.1 69,742 50.7 25,867 52.1
 <24 g 70,227 37.5 51,509 37.5 18,718 37.7
 24–48 g 13,351 7.1 10,069 7.3 3,282 6.6
 >48 g 8,039 4.3 6,210 4.5 1,829 3.7
Ever use of antihistamines 28,413 15.2 8,381 6.1 20,032 40.3 <0.0001
Allergy severity <0.0001
 None 137,530 73.5 137,530 100.0 0 0.0
 AACs with no medication use 28,089 15.0 0 0.0 28,089 56.5
 AACs with medication use 20,032 10.7 0 0.0 20,032 40.3

Abbreviations: AAC, atopic allergic condition; SD, standard deviation

1

From a t-test for age and chi-square test for all other variables

2

Mean (SD)

3

Incidence rate per 100,000 person-years, age-standardized to US Census 2000 standard population, left truncated at age 45

4

Intake during the year prior to cohort entry

In our models minimally adjusted for age, sex and race, we detected no significant associations between AACs, antihistamine use, or allergy severity with pancreatic cancer (Table 2). However, we found a borderline protective association for those who had used antihistamines for five or less years (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65–1.00) compared to those who did not use any medications. All of the aforementioned associations were quite similar and non-significant after including the remaining covariates in our fully adjusted models. Again, we observed a borderline reduced risk for individuals with five or less years of antihistamine use (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–1.01) compared to those without any history of medication use (Table 2).

Table 2.

Associations between various allergy-related exposures and pancreatic cancer

Exposure N Cases Minimally adjusted RR (CI)1 Fully adjusted RR (CI)2
Atopic allergic conditions (AACs)
 No 137,530 1,094 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 Yes 49,696 361 0.97 (0.86–1.10) 1.00 (0.88–1.12)
Ever use of antihistamines3
 No 149,760 1,191 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 Yes 28,413 190 0.90 (0.77–1.05) 0.92 (0.78–1.07)
Duration of antihistamine use4
 None 149,760 1,191 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 ≤5 years of medication use 15,405 92 0.81 (0.65–1.00) 0.82 (0.66–1.01)
 >5 years of medication use 9,538 76 1.09 (0.86–1.37) 1.12 (0.89–1.42)
 ptrend5 0.71 0.94
Allergy severity
 None 137,530 1,094 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 AACs with no medication use 28,089 208 0.99 (0.85–1.15) 1.01 (0.87–1.17)
 AACs with medication use 20,032 142 0.96 (0.81–1.15) 0.99 (0.83–1.19)
 ptrend5 0.67 0.98
1

Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity

2

Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking status, family history of pancreatic cancer, education, BMI, diabetes, and alcohol intake.

3

Information on antihistamine use missing for 9,053 participants (4.8% of cohort)

4

Length of antihistamine use missing for 3,470 participants (12.2% of medication users)

5

From a model treating exposure as a continuous variable

The null associations for AACs and ever use of antihistamines were present across all stratified analyses, except within the oldest individuals (age 70+) in the cohort (Tables 3 & 4). Among individuals who were 70 or older at cohort entry, those who had a history of AACs had a 26% reduced risk (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98) while those who used antihistamines had a 34% reduced risk (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.96) of pancreatic cancer. In addition, AACs had a borderline protective association among those who were followed for less than five years (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56–1.04). There were no associations of AACs and antihistamines within any of the other subgroups stratified by sex, ethnicity, BMI, family history of pancreatic cancer, smoking, diabetes, and alcohol use (Table 3 & 4).

Table 3.

Association between atopic allergic conditions and pancreatic cancer among subgroups of cohort

Subgroup Non-AAC Cases AAC Cases RR (CI)1 p
All 1,094 361 1.00 (0.88–1.12) 0.94
Age group at baseline 0.202
 <50 69 35 1.15 (0.76–1.74) 0.50
 50–54 86 34 1.03 (0.69–1.54) 0.88
 55–59 146 66 1.29 (0.96–1.74) 0.09
 60–64 185 63 0.99 (0.74–1.32) 0.94
 65–69 314 100 1.00 (0.80–1.26) 0.98
 70+ 294 63 0.74 (0.560.98) 0.03
Sex 0.912
 Male 555 133 1.01 (0.83–1.22) 0.95
 Female 539 228 0.99 (0.84–1.15) 0.85
Ethnicity 0.522
 Whites 209 83 0.95 (0.73-1.23) 0.70
 African Americans 216 68 0.92 (0.70-1.21) 0.54
 Latinos 200 58 1.16 (0.86-1.56) 0.33
 Japanese Americans 376 126 1.06 (0.86-1.30) 0.58
 Native Hawaiians 93 26 0.78 (0.50-1.22) 0.28
Follow-up time (years) 0.272
 <5 211 54 0.76 (0.56-1.04) 0.08
 ≥5 883 307 1.04 (0.91-1.18) 0.59
Family history of pancreatic cancer 0.132
 No 1,055 351 1.01 (0.90-1.15) 0.85
 Yes 39 10 0.61 (0.30-1.23) 0.17
Diabetes 0.742
 No 929 310 0.99 (0.87-1.13) 0.85
 Yes 165 51 1.04 (0.75-1.43) 0.82
Body mass index (kg/m2) 0.192
 <25 453 134 0.88 (0.72-1.07) 0.19
 25-30 426 139 1.06 (0.87-1.28) 0.58
 ≥30 215 88 1.13 (0.88-1.46) 0.33
Smoking status 0.492
 Never 461 168 1.07 (0.89-1.28) 0.49
 Past 424 133 0.89 (0.73-1.09) 0.25
 Current 209 60 1.06 (0.79-1.42) 0.70
Alcohol intake (g/day)3 0.672
 None 579 202 1.03 (0.87-1.21) 0.75
 <24 g 388 125 0.98 (0.80-1.20) 0.82
 24-48 g 78 25 1.11 (0.70-1.75) 0.67
 >48 g 49 9 0.62 (0.30-1.28) 0.19
1

Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking status, family history of pancreatic cancer, education, BMI, diabetes, and alcohol intake. Among subgroups, models are not adjusted for the subgroup variable

2

P-value for heterogeneity

3

Intake during the year prior to cohort entry

Table 4.

Association between antihistamine medication use and pancreatic cancer among subgroups of cohort

Subgroup Cases with no antihistamine use Cases with antihistamine use RR (CI)1 p
All 1,191 190 0.92 (0.78-1.07) 0.26
Age group at baseline 0.362
 <50 80 18 1.11 (0.66-1.87) 0.69
 50-54 103 16 0.82 (0.48-1.40) 0.47
 55-59 167 34 1.04 (0.72-1.51) 0.84
 60-64 206 34 0.91 (0.63-1.32) 0.62
 65-69 334 58 1.03 (0.78-1.37) 0.84
 70+ 301 30 0.66 (0.45-0.96) 0.03
Sex 0.092
 Male 578 76 1.08 (0.85-1.38) 0.52
 Female 613 114 0.82 (0.67-1.00) 0.05
Ethnicity 0.282
 Whites 244 42 0.78 (0.56-1.09) 0.15
 African Americans 221 37 0.76 (0.54-1.08) 0.13
 Latinos 206 33 0.89 (0.62-1.29) 0.54
 Japanese Americans 421 66 1.15 (0.89-1.50) 0.29
 Native Hawaiians 99 12 0.95 (0.52-1.75) 0.88
Follow-up time (years) 0.732
 <5 220 28 0.83 (0.55-1.23) 0.35
 ≥5 971 162 0.94 (0.79-1.11) 0.46
Family history of pancreatic cancer 0.302
 No 1,149 185 0.93 (0.79-1.09) 0.35
 Yes 42 5 0.62 (0.24-1.58) 0.32
Diabetes 0.112
 No 1,019 158 0.87 (0.73-1.03) 0.10
 Yes 172 32 1.24 (0.84-1.81) 0.23
Body mass index (kg/m2) 0.722
 <25 488 79 0.97 (0.76-1.23) 0.79
 25-30 466 73 0.91 (0.71-1.17) 0.46
 ≥30 237 38 0.83 (0.59-1.18) 0.30
Smoking status 0.812
 Never 503 89 0.97 (0.77-1.22) 0.79
 Past 464 71 0.86 (0.67-1.11) 0.24
 Current 224 30 0.90 (0.61-1.22) 0.60
Alcohol intake (g/day)3 0.792
 None 634 97 0.88 (0.71-1.09) 0.23
 <24 g 421 76 1.00 (0.78-1.27) 0.97
 24-48 g 87 10 0.77 (0.40-1.49) 0.44
 >48 g 49 7 0.93 (0.42-2.07) 0.86
1

Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking status, family history of pancreatic cancer, education, BMI, diabetes, and alcohol intake. Among subgroups, models are not adjusted for the subgroup variable

2

P-value for heterogeneity

3

Intake during the year prior to cohort entry

DISCUSSION

In this prospective cohort study, we investigated the influence of atopic allergic conditions and antihistamine medication use on pancreatic cancer risk in a population of white, African American, Latino, Japanese American and Native Hawaiian individuals. After adjusting for covariates, we observed no significant association between any prior history of AACs, antihistamine use, or allergy severity with the incidence of pancreatic cancer. The null associations for AACs and antihistamine medication were consistent across subgroups defined by sex, ethnicity, follow-up time, BMI, family history, smoking status, diabetes and alcohol use. However, we did observe protective associations among those who were aged 70+ at cohort entry. While these findings may have resulted from censoring due to death, further evaluations of AACs and antihistamines on pancreatic cancer risk among older individuals might be worthwhile.

Four previous prospective cohorts have studied the association of AACs and pancreatic cancer. In these studies, the number of pancreatic cancer cases ranged between 4 and 172 and the resulting RR’s ranged from 0.59 to 2.16.911 Thus, the null findings in these cohorts may have been attributed to insufficient statistical power. Though the largest number of cases came from the 29,000 Finnish male smokers from the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, the results from this study cannot be easily extrapolated to the general population given the specificity of the study participants.12 These cohort members were also at a higher baseline risk for pancreatic cancer given their shared smoking history.15 Our results in the MEC agree with the null results of these past studies and, with nearly 1,500 cases from an ethnically diverse population, provide more convincing evidence of a null association between overall allergies and pancreatic cancer.

On the other hand, our findings conflict with the protective associations found in several case-control studies. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the participant selection across prospective and retrospective study designs. For instance, many of the case-control studies excluded a large proportion of cases due to death, refusal and non-response. Among the seven case-control studies that reported a decreased cancer risk for any allergic condition, nearly all were unable to recruit over half of the entire population of cases.1622 These exclusions could have introduced selection bias if the association of AACs and cancer risk was different across those enrolled and not enrolled in the studies. This is further supported by the fact that the strongest associations were observed in studies that recruited the lowest number of cases.16,17 Though prospective cohorts are susceptible to selection bias due to loss of follow-up, our cohort was able to monitor the outcomes of all of our participants by passive linkage to the statewide SEER registry and National Death Index.

Based on the existing literature, it appears that the influence of AACs on pancreatic risk may differ according to the type of allergy. Past case-control studies have showed fairly consistent inverse associations with hay fever and other nasal allergies,4,1619,2123 but only a few studies have showed decreased risks for asthma4,20,23 and skin allergies.19,20,23 While most studies had null findings for skin allergies and asthma, one retrospective cohort from Sweden found an increased pancreatic cancer risk among hospitalized asthma patients,8 suggesting that disease severity may also play a role in carcinogenesis. For several studies that used a composite assessment of allergies, the protective overall associations seemed to be driven by the individual effects of hay fever and other nasal allergies.1619,21,22 Since we do not know the breakdown and prevalence of each allergic condition in the Multiethnic Cohort, our null result could have been attributed to a condition that is not as strongly associated with pancreatic cancer. As hayfever represents a modest percentage of all atopic allergic conditions at roughly 30%,24,25 it is plausible that we could have missed a strong association in this subset.

The mechanism in which allergies may impact cancer risk is still not well understood. AACs have been theorized to either decrease risk through heightened immunosurveillance or increase risk through chronic inflammation.26 Although the protective associations from previous studies provide evidence for the immunosurveillance pathway, other studies have found no relationship between IgE levels, a biologic marker for allergic response, and pancreatic cancer risk.27,28 Medical treatment of allergies may also modify the underlying mechanism, but there has been limited information regarding allergy medications and pancreatic cancer. Aside from our current analysis that detected no association of antihistamines, one other case-control study found protective associations among those who reported receiving medical treatment for allergies.20 Another case-control study suggested that medication use may confound the association of allergies with pancreatic cancer, but did not conduct a formal analysis of this relationship.18 In our study, we attempted to tease apart the interaction between allergies and medications with our allergy severity index, but did not observe any significant associations with this measurement.

Other important factors in determining pancreatic cancer risk could possibly include the timing and duration of allergic conditions. In the recent PanGenEU case-control study, researchers found that participants who had post-childhood onset or ≥17 years of asthma had a reduced risk for pancreatic cancer.4 Likewise, the Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium observed a stronger protective effect among individuals with late onset of allergic conditions compared to those with early onset.29 We addressed timing of AACs in our cohort by examining duration of antihistamine use and performing subgroup analyses by follow-up time, since those who had used medications for shorter lengths or completed the baseline questionnaire within five years may have had a more recent diagnosis of allergies. Hence, the borderline protective associations that we detected for the shorter periods of both antihistamine use and follow-up time may support the trend of a reduced risk among individuals with later onset allergies. In general, case-control studies would be more likely than prospective studies to catch more recent diagnoses of AACs since exposure assessment was done after identifying all cases and controls.

One of the major strengths of this study is the large and heterogeneous sample, which allowed us to evaluate the relationship between AACs and pancreatic cancer in many different subgroups. In comparison to the previous four prospective cohorts, the present results are based on the greatest number of pancreatic cancer cases and are more generalizable to a heterogeneous population. We were also able to examine both medication use and an allergy severity index, which was not done in the past prospective cohorts. Since we collected epidemiologic data prior to disease diagnosis and linked to cancer registries with virtually complete case-ascertainment, our study is less susceptible to the recall and selection bias that may exist in case-control studies. However, due to our single measure of AACs, we could not study individual conditions and may have missed associations for certain types of allergies. We also did not have any biological measurements (e.g. IgE) or information on the timing of AACs, limiting our ability to elucidate the detailed pathways in which allergies may impact risk.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between AACs and antihistamines with pancreatic cancer in a diverse and well-powered prospective setting. Our results are consistent with that of past prospective studies and provide additional support of a null association for overall AACs. Future prospective studies should aim to conduct a more comprehensive assessment of specific AACs and allergy-treating medications on pancreatic cancer risk.

Novelty and Impact.

Atopic allergic conditions (AACs) have been associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer in case-control studies, but have had mainly null associations in prospective cohorts. Here, in the largest and most diverse prospective study to date, the authors report no association between AACs or antihistamine use with overall pancreatic cancer incidence. These null relationships were also consistent across subgroups defined by ethnicity (African Americans, Japanese Americans, Latinos, Native Hawaiians, whites) and pancreatic cancer risk factors.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by UM1CA164973 and R01CA209798 from the NIH/NCI. V. Wendy Setiawan is supported by an American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant (RSG-16-250-01-CPHPS). Brian Z. Huang is supported by the T32 Training Grant in Cancer Epidemiology (T32CA009142) at UCLA.

Abbreviations

AAC

atopic allergic conditions

MEC

Multiethnic Cohort Study

RR

risk ratio

CI

confidence interval

BMI

body mass index

SEER

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Farrow B, Evers BM. Inflammation and the development of pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol. 2002;10:153–169. doi: 10.1016/s0960-7404(02)00015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gomez-Rubio P, Zock JP, Rava M, Marquez M, Sharp L, Hidalgo M, Carrato A, Ilzarbe L, Michalski C, Molero X, Farre A, Perea J, Greenhalf W, O’Rorke M, Tardon A, Gress T, Barbera V, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Dominguez-Munoz E, Munoz-Bellvis L, Alvarez-Urturi C, Balcells J, Barneo L, Costello E, Guillen-Ponce C, Kleeff J, Kong B, Lawlor R, Lohr M, Mora J, Murray L, O’Driscoll D, Pelaez P, Poves I, Scarpa A, Real FX, Malats N, PanGenEU Study Investigators Reduced risk of pancreatic cancer associated with asthma and nasal allergies. Gut. 2017;66:314–322. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gandini S, Lowenfels AB, Jaffee EM, Armstrong TD, Maisonneuve P. Allergies and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis with review of epidemiology and biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1908–1916. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kallen B, Gunnarskog J, Conradson TB. Cancer risk in asthmatic subjects selected from hospital discharge registry. Eur Respir J. 1993;6:694–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vesterinen E, Pukkala E, Timonen T, Aromaa A. Cancer incidence among 78,000 asthmatic patients. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:976–982. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.6.976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ji J, Shu X, Li X, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Hemminki K. Cancer risk in hospitalised asthma patients. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:829–833. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McWhorter WP. Allergy and risk of cancer. A prospective study using NHANESI followup data. Cancer. 1988;62:451–455. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880715)62:2<451::aid-cncr2820620234>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mills PK, Beeson WL, Abbey DE, Fraser GE, Phillips RL. Dietary habits and past medical history as related to fatal pancreas cancer risk among Adventists. Cancer. 1988;61:2578–2585. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880615)61:12<2578::aid-cncr2820611232>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eriksson NE, Mikoczy Z, Hagmar L. Cancer incidence in 13811 patients skin tested for allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2005;15:161–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Pietinen P, Taylor PR, Virtamo J, Albanes D. A prospective study of medical conditions, anthropometry, physical activity, and pancreatic cancer in male smokers (Finland) Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:417–426. doi: 10.1023/a:1015729615148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, Nomura AM, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Stram DO, Monroe KR, Earle ME, Nagamine FS. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:346–357. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bradburn MJ, Clark TG, Love SB, Altman DG. Survival analysis Part III: multivariate data analysis — choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:605–611. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lynch SM, Vrieling A, Lubin JH, Kraft P, Mendelsohn JB, Hartge P, Canzian F, Steplowski E, Arslan AA, Gross M, Helzlsouer K, Jacobs EJ, LaCroix A, Petersen G, Zheng W, Albanes D, Amundadottir L, Bingham SA, Boffetta P, Boutron-Ruault MC, Chanock SJ, Clipp S, Hoover RN, Jacobs K, Johnson KC, Kooperberg C, Luo J, Messina C, Palli D, Patel AV, Riboli E, Shu XO, Rodriguez Suarez L, Thomas G, Tjonneland A, Tobias GS, Tong E, Trichopoulos D, Virtamo J, Ye W, Yu K, Zeleniuch-Jacquette A, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ. Cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the pancreatic cancer cohort consortium. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:403–413. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eppel A, Cotterchio M, Gallinger S. Allergies are associated with reduced pancreas cancer risk: a population-based case-control study in Ontario, Canada. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:2241–2245. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anderson LN, Cotterchio M, Gallinger S. Lifestyle, dietary, and medical history factors associated with pancreatic cancer risk in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:825–834. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9303-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cotterchio M, Lowcock E, Hudson TJ, Greenwood C, Gallinger S. Association between allergies and risk of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:469–480. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Holly EA, Eberle CA, Bracci PM. Prior history of allergies and pancreatic cancer in the San Francisco Bay area. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:432–441. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Ghadirian P, Baghurst PA, Zatonski WA, Miller AB, Duell EJ, Boffetta P, Boyle P. Past medical history and pancreatic cancer risk: results from a multicenter case-control study. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Silverman DT, Schiffman M, Everhart J, Goldstein A, Lillemoe KD, Swanson GM, Schwartz AG, Brown LM, Greenberg RS, Schoenberg JB, Pottern LM, Hoover RN, Fraumeni JF., Jr Diabetes mellitus, other medical conditions and familial history of cancer as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1830–1837. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Olson SH, Orlow I, Simon J, Tommasi D, Roy P, Bayuga S, Ludwig E, Zauber AG, Kurtz RC. Allergies, variants in IL-4 and IL-4R alpha genes, and risk of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31:345–351. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mack TM, Yu MC, Hanisch R, Henderson BE. Pancreas cancer and smoking, beverage consumption, and past medical history. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;76:49–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu AH, Jaramillo R, Sicherer SH, Wood RA, Bock SA, Burks AW, Massing M, Cohn RD, Zeldin DC. National prevalence and risk factors for food allergy and relationship to asthma: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:798–806.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hoppin JA, Jaramillo R, Salo P, Sandler DP, London SJ, Zeldin DC. Questionnaire predictors of atopy in a US population sample: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2006. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:544–552. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Josephs DH, Spicer JF, Corrigan CJ, Gould HJ, Karagiannis SN. Epidemiological associations of allergy, IgE and cancer. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43:1110–1123. doi: 10.1111/cea.12178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Olson SH, Hsu M, Wiemels JL, Bracci PM, Zhou M, Patoka J, Reisacher WR, Wang J, Kurtz RC, Silverman DT, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ. Serum immunoglobulin e and risk of pancreatic cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1414–1420. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lindelof B, Granath F, Tengvall-Linder M, Ekbom A. Allergy and cancer. Allergy. 2005;60:1116–1120. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olson SH, Hsu M, Satagopan JM, Maisonneuve P, Silverman DT, Lucenteforte E, Anderson KE, Borgida A, Bracci PM, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Cotterchio M, Dai Q, Duell EJ, Fontham EH, Gallinger S, Holly EA, Ji BT, Kurtz RC, La Vecchia C, Lowenfels AB, Luckett B, Ludwig E, Petersen GM, Polesel J, Seminara D, Strayer L, Talamini R, Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium Allergies and risk of pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:691–700. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES