Skeletal Muscle Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Phosphorylation and Lactate Accumulation During Sprint Exercise in Normoxia and Severe Acute Hypoxia: Effects of Antioxidants

Abstract

Compared to normoxia, during sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia the glycolytic rate is increased leading to greater lactate accumulation, acidification, and oxidative stress. To determine the role played by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activation and reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNOS) in muscle lactate accumulation, nine volunteers performed a single 30-s sprint (Wingate test) on four occasions: two after the ingestion of placebo and another two following the intake of antioxidants, while breathing either hypoxic gas (P_IO₂ = 75 mmHg) or room air (P_IO₂ = 143 mmHg). Vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were obtained before, immediately after, 30 and 120 min post-sprint. Antioxidants reduced the glycolytic rate without altering performance or VO₂. Immediately after the sprints, Ser²⁹³- and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylations were reduced to similar levels in all conditions (~66 and 91%, respectively). However, 30 min into recovery Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation reached pre-exercise values while Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α was still reduced by 44%. Thirty minutes after the sprint Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation was greater with antioxidants, resulting in 74% higher muscle lactate concentration. Changes in Ser²⁹³ and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation from pre to immediately after the sprints were linearly related after placebo (r = 0.74, P < 0.001; n = 18), but not after antioxidants ingestion (r = 0.35, P = 0.15). In summary, lactate accumulation during sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia is not caused by a reduced activation of the PDH. The ingestion of antioxidants is associated with increased PDH re-phosphorylation and slower elimination of muscle lactate during the recovery period. Ser²⁹³ re-phosphorylates at a faster rate than Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α during the recovery period, suggesting slightly different regulatory mechanisms.

Introduction

During sprint exercise in normoxia lactate accumulates in the recruited skeletal muscles (Jones et al., 1985; Cheetham et al., 1986; Parolin et al., 1999; Morales-Alamo et al., 2012), indicating that the flux through the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) is not sufficient to avoid pyruvate accumulation and its corresponding reduction to lactate (Howlett et al., 1999). Compared to sprint exercise in normoxia, sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia is accompanied by increased lactate accumulation (McLellan et al., 1990; Morales-Alamo et al., 2012) and greater reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNOS) production and more oxidative stress (Cuevas et al., 2005; Morales-Alamo et al., 2012; Morales-Alamo and Calbet, 2014). Animal experiments have shown that excessive RNOS production may reduce PDH activity (Churchill et al., 2005). It remains unknown whether the increased lactate production during sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia is due, at least in part, to reduced activation of PDH.

Putman et al. (1995) showed that during repeated 30-s isokinetic sprints in normoxia lactate production was not dependent on O₂ delivery. However, we have recently shown that during the last 15 s of a 30-s isokinetic sprint in severe acute hypoxia skeletal muscle VO₂ is indeed limited by O₂ delivery (Calbet et al., 2015). Moreover, during submaximal exercise at 55% of the VO₂max in acute hypoxia (F_iO₂: = 0.11), the level of PDH activation after 1 min cycling was lower than in normoxia (Parolin et al., 2000).

Increased acidification during exercise in hypoxia may reduce nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase 2 (NOX2) activity, which is considered the main source of ion superoxide production during exercise (Simchowitz, 1985; Morgan et al., 2005; Brennan-Minnella et al., 2015), particularly during brief periods (10–15 min) of contractile activity (Jackson, 2015). Superoxide stimulates Ca²⁺ efflux through the ryanodine receptors of the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (Jackson et al., 2007; Dulhunty et al., 2017). The increased (Ca²⁺) in the sarcoplasm is necessary for the activation of PDH phosphatases, which dephosphorylate and activate PDH (Hucho et al., 1972; Wieland, 1983; Behal et al., 1993) (Figure 1). Thus, the increased muscle acidification during sprint exercise in hypoxia may reduce PDH activation by at least four mechanisms: (1) by decreasing Ca²⁺ efflux from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Bailey et al., 2007; Dulhunty et al., 2017), (2) by inducing the activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) (Churchill et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2013), (3) by causing oxidative damage to the enzyme (Tabatabaie et al., 1996), and (4) by reducing PDH phosphatase activity (Radak et al., 2013). In the case of an inhibitory influence of exercise-induced RNOS on PDH activation, the ingestion of antioxidants before sprint exercise should enhance PDH dephosphorylation and activation, leading to lower accumulation of lactate.

Figure 1.

Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity in skeletal muscle. Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) is regulated by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation by pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) and pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase (PDP), respectively. PDC catalyzes the irreversible decarboxylation of pyruvate to Acetyl-CoA, which can be oxidized through the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; DLD, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced; CoASH, coenzyme A.

Pyruvate dehydrogenase is activated by dephosphorylation of serine residues (Ser²³², Ser²⁹³, Ser³⁰⁰) located in the E1α subunit of PDH (Yeaman et al., 1978) (Figure 1). The balance between the activities of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases (PDKs) and PDH phosphatases (PDP) determines the degree of PDH activation (Hucho et al., 1972; Wieland, 1983; Behal et al., 1993).

Therefore, the main aim of this study was to determine whether PDH activation, as determined by the assessment of its phosphorylation level, is reduced during sprint exercise in hypoxia compared to the same exercise performed in normoxia. Another aim was to ascertain whether antioxidants administration immediately before a sprint exercise in normoxia or hypoxia influences PDH activity during the subsequent recovery period.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Initially, 10 healthy male physical education students agreed to participate in this investigation, but completed data for all conditions were obtained in nine of them (age = 25 ± 5 year, height = 176.0 ± 5.1 cm, body mass = 79.4 ± 10.1 kg, body fat = 18.3 ± 6.7%, Table 1). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (CEIH-2010-01). All subjects signed a written informed consent before entering the study.

Table 1.

Physical characteristics and ergoespirometric variables during incremental and sprint exercise in normoxia and severe acute hypoxia (mean ± SD).

	Normoxia	Hypoxia
Age (years)	25.2 ± 4.7
Height (cm)	176.0 ± 5.1
Weight (Kg)	80.2 ± 9.9
% body fat	18.3 ± 6.7
Two-Legs lean mass (Kg)	19.5 ± 2.4
SHRpeak (Beats/min)	175.2 ± 8.0	173.5 ± 9.2*
VO2max (L/min)	3.850 ± 0.308	2.586 ± 0.208*
Wmax (W)	356.3 ± 38.62	285.3 ± 32.1*
Wpeak (W)	999.11 ± 129.0	944.3 ± 131.3
Wpeak/Kg LLM (W/kg)	16.6 ± 2.0	15.6 ± 1.4
Wmean (W)	575.3 ± 60.7	539.8 ± 69.0*
Wmean/Kg LLM (W/kg)	9.56 ± 0.85	8.95 ± 0.78*
O2 Demand (L/min)	8.390 ± 0.798	7.830 ± 0.765*
Accumulated VO2 (L)	1.192 ± 0.406	0.847 ± 0.123*
O2 deficit (L)	3.003 ± 0.498	3.068 ± 0.399
O2 deficit/Wmean	5.24 ± 0.83	5.70 ± 0.45*
Wingate SpO2	98.7 ± 0.6	80.6 ± 4.4*
Wingate PETO2	114.1 ± 6.9	48.8 ± 3.3*

SHRpeak, peak heart rate during the sprints; Wmax, maximal intensity during the incremental exercise test to exhaustion; Wpeak, peak power output during the Wingate test; LLM, lean mass of the lower extremities; Wmean, mean power output during the Wingate test; Accumulated VO₂, amount of O₂ consumed during the 30 s Wingate test; SpO₂, Hemoglobin saturation (pulse oximetry); P_ETO₂, end tidal O₂ pressure.

^*P < 0.05 compared to normoxia.

General procedures

Body composition was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR-1500, Hologic Corp., software version 7.10, Waltham, MA) as described elsewhere (Calbet et al., 1998). After familiarization, subjects reported to the laboratory to complete different tests on separate days. First their peak VO₂ (VO₂peak), maximal heart rate (HRmax) and maximal power output (Wmax) were determined in normoxia (F_IO₂: 0.21, P_IO₂: 143 mmHg) and severe acute hypoxia (F_IO₂: 0.105, P_IO₂: 75 mmHg) with an incremental exercise test to exhaustion (50 W/min), as previously described (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012, 2013, 2017). Hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO₂) was determined with a finger pulse oximeter (OEMIII module, 4549-000, Plymouth, MN). The main experiments consisted on a single 30-s isokinetic sprint at 100 revolutions per minute (Wingate Test) repeated on 4 different days, at least 1 week apart. The Wingate tests were carried out in normoxia (F_IO₂: 0.21, P_IO₂: 143 mmHg) and acute hypoxia (F_IO₂: 0.105, P_IO₂: 75 mmHg), both preceded by the ingestion of either placebo (200 mg of starch from corn, Sigma-Aldrich, ref. 14302) or antioxidants, with a double-blind design. Both the placebo and the antioxidants were introduced in microcrystalline cellulose capsules of identical characteristics.

Antioxidant supplements were administered in two doses separated by 30 min, with the first dose ingested 2 h before the sprint exercise, as previously reported (Morales-Alamo et al., 2017). The first dose contained 300 mg of α-lipoic acid, 500 mg vitamin C, and 200 IU vitamin E, whereas the second included 300 mg α-lipoic acid, 500 mg vitamin C, and 400 IU vitamin E (water dispersible). This antioxidant cocktail effectively decreases free radicals levels in blood as demonstrated by paramagnetic spin spectroscopy in humans (Richardson et al., 2007). We assume that similar effects were achieved in skeletal muscle as reflected by two facts. Firstly, these antioxidants blunted the RNOS-mediated signaling response elicited by sprint exercise and, secondly, attenuated the formation of protein carbonyls in this study, as previously reported (Morales-Alamo et al., 2013, 2017).

The experimental days subjects reported to the laboratory early in the morning after a 12 h overnight fast. Then, an antecubital vein was catheterized and after 10 min of rest in the supine position a 20 ml blood sample was withdrawn and used to measure serum glucose and insulin. Right after, a muscle biopsy was obtained from the middle portion of the Vastus lateralis muscle using the Bergstrom's technique with suction (Guerra et al., 2011). After the resting muscle biopsy, the subjects sat on the cycle ergometer for 4 min while breathing either room air or a hypoxic gas mixture from a gas cylinder.

Within 10 s following the sprint, a second muscle biopsy was taken, and then another blood sample was obtained. During the following 2 h, the subjects had free access to water and sat quietly in the laboratory while two additional muscle biopsies and blood samples were obtained at 30 and 120 min post-Wingate. For the last two biopsies, a new incision was performed in the contralateral leg. To avoid injury-triggered activation of signaling cascades, the muscle biopsies were obtained at least 3 cm apart, using the procedures described by Guerra et al. (2011). The muscle specimens were fast cleaned to remove any visible blood, fat, or connective tissue. Then the muscle tissue was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for later analysis.

Oxygen uptake

Oxygen uptake was measured with a metabolic cart (Vmax N29; Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, California, USA), as previously reported (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012, 2013, 2017). Respiratory variables were analyzed breath-by-breath and averaged every 5 s during the Wingate test and every 20 s during the incremental exercise tests (Calbet et al., 1997). The highest 20-s averaged VO₂ recorded in normoxia and hypoxia was taken as the normoxic and hypoxic VO₂peak values, respectively.

Muscle metabolites

From each muscle biopsy, 30 mg of wet tissue were treated with 0.5 M HClO₄ and centrifuged at 15,000 g at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was neutralized with KHCO₃ 2.1M. Phosphocreatine (PCr), creatine (Cr), muscle glucose (GLU), glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), glucose-1-phosphate (G1P), fructose-6-phosphate (F6P), pyruvate (Pyr), and lactate (Lac) were enzymatically determined in neutralized extracts by fluorometric analysis (Lowry and Passonneau, 1972; Gorostiaga et al., 2010). Alanine (Ala) muscle accumulation was assumed to be equivalent to 1.43-fold that of pyruvate accumulation (Katz et al., 1986). Muscle metabolite concentrations were adjusted to the individual mean total creatine (PCr + Cr) because this mean should remain constant during the exercise (Harris et al., 1976). The adjustment to total creatine content accounts for variability in solid non-muscle constituents, which may be present in the biopsies (Parra et al., 2000). This correction was applied to all metabolites including lactate. This assumes that the increase in interstitial lactate and intracellular water was similar in the four trials and that the majority of the lactate produced during the sprints was retained inside the muscle fibers (Calbet et al., 2003). The glycolytic rate (GR) was calculated as GR = 0.5 × (Δ Lac + Δ Pyr + Δ Ala), and glycogenolytic rate (GGR) as GGR = Δ G1P + Δ G6P + Δ F6P + 0.5 × (Δ Lac + Δ Pyr + Δ Ala) (Chasiotis et al., 1982). The NAD⁺/NADH⁺ and ATP/ADP ratios were calculated as previously reported (Morales-Alamo et al., 2017).

Total protein extraction, electrophoresis, and western blot analysis

Muscle protein extracts were prepared as described previously (Guerra et al., 2007) with Complete protease inhibitor cocktail and PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Total protein content was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Smith et al., 1985). Fifty microgram of each sample were subjected to immunobloting (Guerra et al., 2010) using Immun-BlotTM PVDF membranes from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire, UK). Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation and total PDH were determined by western blot (50 μg in each lane) using specific antibodies (AP1062 and AP1064 from Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany; and sc-133898, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA). Antibodies were diluted in 4% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) (BSA-blocking buffer). To control for differences in loading and transfer efficiency, membranes were incubated with a monoclonal mouse anti-α-tubulin antibody (T-5168-ML, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted in TBS-T with 5% blotting grade blocker non-fat dry milk (blotto-blocking buffer). No significant changes were observed in α-tubulin protein levels during the experiments. Antibody-specific labeling was revealed by incubation with a HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:20,000; 111-035-144, Jackson ImmunoResearch, Baltimore, USA) antibody, both diluted in 5% blotto blocking buffer and specific bands were visualized with the Inmmun-Star™ WesternC™ kit, using the ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and analyzed with the image analysis program Quantity one© (Bio-Rad laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The densitometry analysis was carried out immediately before saturation of the immunosignal. Muscle-signaling data were represented as a percentage of immunostaining values obtained for the phosphorylated form of each kinase relative to the respective total form. Samples from each subject trial were run on the same gel. In addition, in all gels a human muscle sample obtained from a healthy young man was used as an internal control, to reduce inter-gel variability (Bass et al., 2017).

Statistics

Variables were checked for normal distribution by using the Shapiro-Wilks test. A three-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used with three within subject factors: F_IO₂ (with two levels: normoxia and hypoxia), antioxidants (with two levels: antioxidants and placebo), and time (with four levels: pre-exercise, end-exercise, 30 and 120 min recovery). The Mauchly's test of sphericity was run before the ANOVA, and in the case of violation of the sphericity assumption, the degrees of freedom were adjusted according to the Huynh and Feldt test. When a significant main effect or interaction was observed, specific pairwise comparisons were carried out with the least significant difference post-hoc test. The relationship between variables was determined using linear regression analysis. The areas under the curve (AUC) were determined using the trapezoidal rule and compared between conditions with paired Student t-tests. Values are reported as the mean ± standard deviation of the mean (unless otherwise stated). P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Performance and metabolism

Part of the effects on performance (Table 1) and muscle metabolites (Table 2) have been published previously (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012, 2013, 2017) and are only summarized here. Peak power output was similar between conditions. Mean power output was reduced by 5.3% in hypoxia (P = 0.03) and was not affected by the ingestion of antioxidants (558 ± 62 and 559 ± 61 W, placebo and antioxidants, respectively P = 0.81). The accumulated VO₂ during the Wingate test was reduced by 30% in hypoxia (P = 0.006) and was not altered by the ingestion of antioxidants (1.095 ± 0.242 and 1.098 ± 0.267 L, placebo and antioxidants, respectively P = 0.99). The mean muscle lactate concentration at the end of the sprint was 23% lower after the ingestion of antioxidants (46.8 ± 13.4 and 36.2 ± 12.1 mmol.kg wet⁻¹, mean of the two placebo and mean of the two antioxidants conditions, respectively, P = 0.004) and 30% higher in hypoxia than normoxia (46.9 ± 13.9 and 36.1 ± 12.2 mmol.kg wet⁻¹, mean of the two hypoxia and the two normoxia conditions, respectively, P = 0.004). The ingestion of antioxidants reduced the glycolytic rate by 25% from 22.3 ± 6.8 to 16.9 ± 6.0 mmol.kg⁻¹. (30 s)⁻¹ (P = 0.002), while the reduction in the glycogenolytic rate did not reach statistical significance (from 27.2 ± 7.0 to 25.4 ± 10.3 mmol.kg⁻¹. (30 s)⁻¹, for the mean of the two placebo and the two antioxidants conditions, respectively, P = 0.49). Compared to placebo, 30 min after the end of the sprints preceded by antioxidants muscle lactate concentration was 74% greater (4.3 ± 3.0 vs. 8.1 ± 4.5 mmol.kg wet⁻¹, mean of the two placebo and the two antioxidants conditions, respectively, P = 0.02). The ratio ATP/ADP was similarly reduced after the sprints and recovered to pre-exercise levels 30 min later, regardless of the F_IO₂ and antioxidants ingestion (Table 2). Immediately after the sprints, the NAD⁺/NADH⁺ ratio was decreased more in hypoxia than normoxia (from 618 ± 355 to 42.5 ± 14.5 and from 452 ± 201 to 72.8 ± 28.6, mean of the two hypoxia and the two normoxia conditions, respectively, P = 0.003). The NAD⁺/NADH⁺ ratio was lower after the administration of antioxidants (P = 0.03, antioxidants main effect) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Muscle metabolites before, immediately after, and 30 min following a 30-s all-out sprint (Wingate test) in normoxia (P_IO₂ = 143 mmHg) and hypoxia (P_IO₂ = 74 mmHg), after the ingestion of antioxidants or placebo.

	Placebo		Antioxidants		Time	Antiox	Antiox × Time	FIO2	FIO2 × Time	Antiox × FIO2 × Time
	Hypoxia	Normoxia	Hypoxia	Normoxia
Pre PCr	16.5 ± 1.5	16.0 ± 2.8	18.2 ± 2.3	17.8 ± 2.3	<0.001	0.12	0.78	0.49	0.75	0.97
Post PCr	6.0 ± 3.3a	5.0 ± 2.2a	6.8 ± 3.1a	6.0 ± 2.9a
Post 30 min PCr	18.8 ± 4.0	18.4 ± 1.9	19.3 ± 2.0	19.6 ± 2.3
Pre Cr	11.9 ± 1.5	12.4 ± 2.8	10.2 ± 2.3	10.6 ± 2.3	<0.001	0.12	0.78	0.49	0.75	0.97
Post Cr	22.4 ± 3.3a	23.5 ± 2.2a	21.6 ± 3.1a	22.4 ± 2.9a
Post 30 min Cr	9.6 ± 4.0	10.1 ± 1.9	9.1 ± 2.0	8.8 ± 2.3
Pre ATP	4.8 ± 1.0	5.1 ± 1.9	5.2 ± 1.2	5.0 ± 1.6	<0.001	0.41	0.009	0.9	0.016	0.37
Post ATP	3.2 ± 1.6a	2.4 ± 0.8a	3.1 ± 0.8a	3.5 ± 1.4a
Post 30 min ATP	4.6 ± 2.0	3.5 ± 1.4	3.5 ± 1.1	4.8 ± 1.1
Pre ADP	0.4 ± 0.2	0.5 ± 0.3	0.3 ± 0.2	0.3 ± 0.2	<0.001	0.4	0.85	0.074	0.76	0.047
Post ADP	0.9 ± 0.8	0.7 ± 0.5	0.4 ± 0.2	0.9 ± 0.8a
Post 30 min ADP	0.3 ± 0.2	0.2 ± 0.1	0.2 ± 0.1	0.2 ± 0.2
Pre ATP/ADP	13.6 ± 3.2	13.3 ± 5.6	18.3 ± 6.3	17.3 ± 6.8	<0.001	0.28	0.52	0.33	0.64	0.49
Post ATP/ADP	5.9 ± 3.8a	4.5 ± 2.5a	7.9 ± 2.9ab	6.0 ± 4.3a
Post 30 min ATP/ADP	27.2 ± 25.2	18.3 ± 5.3	21.8 ± 7.9	22.8 ± 8.0
Pre G1P	0.04 ± 0.05	0.02 ± 0.02	0.05 ± 0.04	0.06 ± 0.07	0.001	0.18	0.14	0.901	0.17	0.07
Post G1P	0.25 ± 0.30a	0.11 ± 0.10a	0.34 ± 0.21a	0.38 ± 0.32a
Post 30 min G1P	0.05 ± 0.03	0.15 ± 0.16	0.10 ± 0.13	0.11 ± 0.12
Pre G6P	0.50 ± 0.33	0.47 ± 0.38	0.46 ± 0.31	0.32 ± 0.37	<0.001	0.21	0.22	0.787	0.01	0.08
Post G6P	4.40 ± 3.21a	5.38 ± 1.97a	10.34 ± 6.98a	5.88 ± 4.77a
Post 30 min G6P	1.21 ± 1.60	2.96 ± 6.37	1.44 ± 1.92	4.39 ± 5.29
Pre F6P	0.08 ± 0.06	0.05 ± 0.06	0.06 ± 0.07	0.06 ± 0.06	0.005	0.06	0.2	0.098	0.34	0.96
Post F6P	0.24 ± 0.30	0.36 ± 0.32a	0.50 ± 0.41a	0.59 ± 0.42a
Post 30min F6P	0.09 ± 0.11	0.22 ± 0.55	0.24 ± 0.32	0.59 ± 0.40
Pre Pyr	0.14 ± 0.05	0.08 ± 0.04	0.09 ± 0.04	0.10 ± 0.07	0.02	0.16	0.08	0.09	0.11	0.11
Post Pyr	0.23 ± 0.07a	0.26 ± 0.13a	0.17 ± 0.07	0.27 ± 0.09a
Post 30 min Pyr	0.07 ± 0.06	0.16 ± 0.10a	0.10 ± 0.09	0.13 ± 0.10
Pre Lac	2.1 ± 1.3	2.6 ± 2.0	3.1 ± 2.0	2.4 ± 2.2	<0.001	0.06	0.002	0.009	0.002	0.26
Post Lac	55.4 ± 20.1a,b,c	38.2 ± 12.3a	38.3 ± 10.6a,c	34.1 ± 14.9a
Post 30 min Lac	3.7 ± 2.9	5.0 ± 3.2	7.3 ± 8.8	8.9 ± 4.9a
Pre NAD+/NADH+ × 10−7	897 ± 667	405 ± 250	339 ± 262	501 ± 363	<0.001	0.03	0.23	0.21	0.3	0.018
Post NAD+/NADH+ × 10−7	43 ± 21a	60 ± 22a	42 ± 16a,b,c	85 ± 51a,d
Post 30 min NAD+/NADH+ × 10−7	256 ± 232a	350 ± 313	348 ± 421	153 ± 120a

Values are means ± SD. Concentrations are reported in mmol.kg⁻¹ muscle wet weight.

^aP < 0.05 Compared with Pre sprint.

^bP < 0.05 compared with normoxia placebo at the same time point.

^cP < 0.05 compared with normoxia antioxidants at the same time point.

^dP < 0.05 compared with hypoxia placebo at the same time point. Pre, Pre sprint; Post, Post sprint; Post 30 min, 30 min into the recovery period; Antiox, antioxidants; Lac, lactate; Pyr, Pyruvate. n = 9.

Serum glucose and insulin concentrations were increased after the sprints (Figure 2). Although the changes in serum glucose concentration were similar after the four conditions, the serum insulin concentration tended to be marginally greater (+15%) after the sprints preceded by the ingestion of antioxidants compared to the placebo conditions (ANOVA time effect, P = 0.08). After the sprints performed in hypoxia, the elevation of plasma insulin was marginally greater than in normoxia (F_IO₂ × time interaction, P = 0.045).

Figure 2.

Serum glucose and insulin. Serum glucose (A) and insulin concentration (B) before, immediately after, and 30 and 120 min after the end of a single 30-s all-out sprint (Wingate test) performed in normoxia placebo (black circles), hypoxia placebo (open circles, F_IO₂:0.105), normoxia antioxidants (black triangles) and hypoxia antioxidants (open triangles; F_IO₂:0.105). ^*P < 0.05 in comparison to resting (ANOVA, time main effect, n = 9).

PDH phosphorylation

Immediately after the sprint Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation was reduced to a similar level in all conditions (~66%, P = 0.002; Figures 3A–C). However, 30 min after the sprint preceded by the ingestion of antioxidants Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation reached pre-exercise values (P = 0.86). Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation was 93% greater after the ingestion of antioxidants than placebo (ANOVA antioxidants effect P = 0.017; Figure 3E). Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α was dephosphorylated to similar values immediately after the sprints in normoxia and hypoxia (P = 0.68, for the comparison between normoxia vs. hypoxia immediately after the sprints; Figure 3G).

Figure 3.

Representative western blots for Ser²⁹³-PDH-1Eα and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-1Eα phosphorylations and PDH-1Eα total protein expression in response to a single 30 s sprint after placebo (A) or antioxidants (B) intake. Levels of Ser²⁹³-PDH-1Eα phosphorylation to PDH-1Eα total protein expression (C,E,G), and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-1Eα phosphorylation to total PDH-1Eα total protein expression (D,F,H) before, immediately after, 30 and 120 min following the end of a single 30 s all-out sprint (Wingate test). (C,D) Responses to sprints performed in normoxia placebo (black circles), hypoxia placebo (open circles, F_IO₂: 0.105), normoxia antioxidants (black triangles) and hypoxia antioxidants (open triangles; F_IO₂: 0.105). (E,F) Represent the responses observed for two placebo conditions (gray circles) averaged compared to the average of the two antioxidants conditions (gray triangles). (G,H) Represent the responses for the average of the normoxic conditions (black squares) compared to the average of the hypoxic conditions (open squares; F_IO₂:0.105). ^*P < 0.05 in comparison to resting (ANOVA, time main effect). ^$P < 0.05 compared to Ser²⁹³-PDH-1Eα phosphorylation recovery. n = 9 for all variables.

Immediately after the sprints, Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation was reduced by 91% (P < 0.001), without significant differences between conditions (ANOVA antioxidants × F_IO₂ × time P = 0.40, Figures 3A,B,D). However, during the recovery period, the re-phosphorylation of Ser³⁰⁰ was slower than that of Ser²⁹³ (ANOVA phosphorylation type × time interaction P = 0.012), and 30 min after the end of the sprint Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation was still 44% below pre-exercise values (P = 0.01). Two hours after the end of the sprint Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation reached a value similar to that measured before the sprints (P = 0.80). The Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation values during the experiment preceded by the ingestion of antioxidants were 50% greater than after the intake of placebo. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.14; Figure 3F). Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation changes were similar in the normoxic and hypoxic sprints (ANOVA interaction: P = 0.29; Figure 3H).

The area under the curve (AUC) of Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation was 87% greater after the ingestion of antioxidants (P = 0.01), indicating a greater level of re-phosphorylation during the recovery period after the ingestion of antioxidants. A similar trend was observed for the AUC of the Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation (P = 0.061).

There was an association between the changes in Ser²⁹³ and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation observed from pre, to immediately after the sprints in the placebo conditions (r = 0.74, P < 0.001; n = 18), that was lost in the sprints preceded by the ingestion of antioxidants (r = 0.35, P = 0.15). There was also a negative association between the level of Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation at the end of the sprint and the mean and peak power during the sprint (r = −0.81, and r = −86, respectively, both P < 0.01, n = 9, each point representing the mean value of the four conditions for each subject). Likewise, a negative association was observed between the immediate post-exercise Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α phosphorylation and the corresponding NAD⁺/NADH⁺ ratio (r = −0.80, P = 0.01, n = 9, each point representing the mean value of the four conditions for each subject).

Discussion

Compared to normoxia, during sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia the glycolytic rate is increased leading to greater muscle lactate accumulation, acidification and oxidative stress (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012). Here we show that this increased accumulation of lactate is not due to a lower level of PDH activation during the sprint in hypoxia, pointing toward a mitochondrial limitation of the rate of pyruvate decarboxylation to acetyl-CoA and subsequent oxidation of acetyl groups. In addition, by administering a powerful antioxidant cocktail before the sprint we have demonstrated that antioxidants reduce the glycolytic rate and muscle lactate accumulation during the sprints by a mechanism independent of PDH activation, that seems unrelated to F_IO₂. We have also demonstrated that after the ingestion of antioxidants, PDH is re-phosphorylated to a higher level, which may facilitate a metabolic shift from carbohydrates to fat oxidation (Sjøberg et al., 2017) during the recovery period, at the expense of delaying the removal of muscle lactate. Our results confirm previous in vitro studies showing that the re-phosphorylation of Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α is slower than that of Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α (Yeaman et al., 1978), indicating a slightly different regulation of these two phosphorylation sites in human skeletal muscle or reflecting intrinsic differences between the two phosphorylations. This is also supported by the negative association observed between the level of Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α phosphorylation at the end of the sprint and the mean and peak power during the sprint, which was not observed in the case of Ser²⁹³-PDH-E1α. The most plausible link between power output and Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α dephosphorylation is the increase of intracellular Ca²⁺, which is a fundamental determinant of power output (Bakker et al., 2017).

PDH dephosphorylation-response to sprint exercise is not modified by antioxidants

The activity of PDH is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of three serine residues (Ser²³², Ser²⁹³, Ser³⁰⁰) of the E1α subunit (Kolobova et al., 2001; Korotchkina and Patel, 2001) (Figure 1). Phosphorylation at any of the three sites leads to inhibition of the complex in vitro (Korotchkina and Patel, 1995). These phosphorylations are carried out by pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases, of which four isoforms have been identified (PDK1 to 4), while dephosphorylation is performed by PDH phosphatases, of which two isoforms have been identified (PDP1 and 2) (Teague et al., 1982; Huang et al., 1998). PDK1 is the only isoform reported to phosphorylate all three sites, while PDK2, PDK3, and PDK4 act on Ser²⁹³ and Ser³⁰⁰ in vitro (Kolobova et al., 2001; Korotchkina and Patel, 2001). The most abundant PDK in skeletal muscle is the isoform PDK4, followed by the isoform PDK2 and the less abundant is the isoform PDK1. Nevertheless, knockout mice for PDK2 and PDK4 have a constitutively active PDH in skeletal muscles (Rahimi et al., 2014).

Previous studies have shown that during sprint exercise in normoxia PDH activity is close to its maximum (Parolin et al., 1999), implying that in normoxia lactate accumulation is due to a limitation in the rate at which pyruvate is oxidized (Howlett et al., 1999). As a novelty, the present investigation shows that PDH is dephosphorylated to a similar extent in normoxia and hypoxia with or without antioxidants (Figure 4). Assuming that Ser²⁹³ and Ser³⁰⁰ PDH phosphorylations can be used to assess PDH activity indirectly (Linn et al., 1969; Pilegaard et al., 2006; Kiilerich et al., 2008, 2010), our data indicate similar levels of activation of PDH at the end of the sprint in all conditions. We have reported that during the sprints in severe acute hypoxia our subjects had higher oxidative stress than in normoxia, as shown by a 50% greater intramuscular protein carbonylation and more marked RNOS-mediated signaling (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012). Moreover, the NAD⁺/NADH⁺ ratio was decreased more after the sprints in hypoxia than normoxia (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012). NADH⁺ is an activator of PDKs (Roche and Hiromasa, 2007), which inhibits PDH through serine phosphorylations (Hucho et al., 1972; Behal et al., 1993). However, PDH dephosphorylation was not greater immediately after the sprint in hypoxia than in normoxia, what is against a potentially greater level of PDK activity during the sprint in hypoxia than in normoxia.

Figure 4.

Proposed regulation of PDH activity during sprint exercise and the early post-exercise recovery. During the sprint exercise muscle contractions elicit an immediate increase of sarcoplasmic (Ca²⁺) which activates pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase (PDP, mainly PDP1 which is more expressed in skeletal muscle). PDPs dephosphorylate PDH in the serines 293 and 300, regardless of F_IO₂. While PDH dephosphorylation during sprint exercise is not modified by antioxidants, antioxidants facilitate Ser²⁹³PDH-1Eα re-phosphorylation during the recovery period. This indicates that reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNOS) contribute maintaining PDH in its active form, or that RNOS slow-down re-phosphorylation during the recovery period. Several regulatory factors of PDKs activity are modified by sprint exercise. After the sprints, the ATP/ADP ratio is decreased to a similar extent in normoxia and hypoxia, regardless of the ingestion of antioxidants. The NAD⁺/NADH⁺ ratio is decreased to a greater extent in hypoxia than normoxia, with this effect being attenuated after the ingestion of antioxidants. Serum insulin increases after the sprint exercise, more when the sprints are performed in hypoxia than normoxia. Normoxia (red arrows), hypoxia (blue arrows), antioxidants (green arrows). The length of the arrow is representative of the magnitude of the change. ^*Indicates that Ser²³²PDH-1Eα was not measured in the present investigation and, therefore, its regulation by F_IO₂ and RNOS during sprint exercise remains unknown.

Thus, both in normoxia and hypoxia, the main factor explaining the accumulation of lactate should relate to either an excessive stimulation of glycolysis and/or a limitation of mitochondrial disposal of pyruvate. Given the fact that leg O₂ delivery and leg O₂ uptake are reduced during sprint exercise in hypoxia compared to the same exercise in normoxia (Calbet et al., 2015), the greater accumulation of lactate in hypoxia than in normoxia likely reflects a mitochondrial limitation due to insufficient O₂ supply.

Nevertheless, our data could also indicate that during the sprints in severe acute hypoxia, and perhaps also in normoxia, the stimulation of glycolysis may be excessive in regard with the actual energy demand (Morales-Alamo et al., 2017). This possibility is supported by the fact that during sprint exercise in hypoxia mean power output was not reduced by the ingestion of antioxidants, despite a marked reduction of ATP provision by the glycolysis, that could not be compensated for by increasing VO₂, since during sprint exercise in hypoxia VO₂ was the same in the placebo and the antioxidants conditions. This finding contrasts with the reported reduction of muscle strength and muscle VO₂ after the intravenous administration of vitamin C and tempol in rats (Herspring et al., 2008). Moreover, the fact that mean power output was not reduced after the administration of antioxidants in acute hypoxia is intriguing because the glycolysis provides 50% or more of the overall energy expenditure during the Wingate test in normoxia (Bogdanis et al., 1996; Parolin et al., 1999) and even more during sprint exercise in hypoxia (Morales-Alamo et al., 2012). Therefore, our antioxidant cocktail should have contributed to reduce the energy demand by, for example, improving the P/O ratio and/or by lowering the energy cost of muscle contraction.

Mitochondria produces RNOS mainly at complexes I and III of the electron transport chain (Barja, 1999; Muller et al., 2004). Ascorbate prevents cytochrome c release from the mitochondrial inner membrane and stabilizes the mitochondrial membrane potential in response to hypoxia-reoxygenation (Dhar-Mascareño et al., 2005) and could improve the phosphorylation potential by increasing the proton motive force across the mitochondrial inner membrane (Brand and Nicholls, 2011). The presence of α-lipoic acid in our antioxidant cocktail could have amplified this effect (Cimolai et al., 2014). Moreover, in agreement with an improved mitochondrial efficiency, experiments in humans, have reported enhanced mitochondrial efficiency during exercise in moderate hypoxia (F_IO₂: 0.13) after nitrate supplementation (Vanhatalo et al., 2014). Antioxidants, like nitrates, increase NO bioavailability (Nyberg et al., 2012; Larsen et al., 2014), which can reduce proton back-leakage across the inner mitochondrial membrane increasing the P/O ratio (Clerc et al., 2007).

Antioxidants may also reduce the energy demand. One of the main contributors to energy expenditure during muscle contraction is the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium pumps (SERCAs), which may account for ~50% of the overall energy expenditure at rest (Norris et al., 2010) and ~30–40% during muscle contractions (Barclay et al., 2007). SERCAs-energy expenditure can be lowered by reducing the amount of calcium efflux through the calcium channels [the ryanodine receptor and the inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs)] and/or by decreasing Ca²⁺ leakage from the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (Chernorudskiy and Zito, 2017). Both processes are increased by RNOS and attenuated by antioxidants (Xu et al., 1998; Kang et al., 2008; Mazurek et al., 2014; Oda et al., 2015). Nevertheless, excessive oxidative stress may also reduce SERCAs activity (Chernorudskiy and Zito, 2017). Calcium transients were likely reduced during the sprints with antioxidants since CaMKII, a kinase that auto-phosphorylates depending on the magnitude of Ca²⁺ transients was less phosphorylated after the sprints preceded by the ingestion of antioxidants in our subjects (Morales-Alamo et al., 2013, 2017).

PDH re-phosphorylation during the recovery period is increased by antioxidants

The recovery of the resting PDH phosphorylation levels requires the activation of PDKs by acetyl-CoA, ${\text{NADH}}_{,}^{+}$ or ATP, which re-phosphorylate PDH favoring the oxidation of acetyl groups (Roche and Hiromasa, 2007; Rahimi et al., 2014). Here we show that antioxidants facilitate PDH re-phosphorylation during the recovery period, with faster re-phosphorylation of Ser²⁹³ than Ser³⁰⁰ (Figure 4), as previously shown with experiments in vitro (Yeaman et al., 1978). Cell-culture experiments have shown that antioxidants stimulate PDKs (Churchill et al., 2005). Although not measured here, PDK activity during the recovery period might have been stimulated by the lower NAD⁺/NADH⁺ ratio after the ingestion of antioxidants (Figure 4), as previously reported (Morales-Alamo et al., 2013, 2017). Cell-culture experiments have also shown that pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase 1 (PDP1) activity is stimulated by lipoic acid (Shan et al., 2014). Nevertheless, an enhanced α-lipoic acid-stimulated PDP1 activity after the ingestion of antioxidants is unlikely inasmuch PDH re-phosphorylation was facilitated during the recovery period after the ingestion of antioxidants. Although PDPs are stimulated by insulin (Thomas and Denton, 1986; Consitt et al., 2016), the insulin response to sprint exercise was not reduced after ingestion of antioxidants in the present study. Thus, the greater PDH re-phosphorylation during the recovery period after antioxidants cannot be attributed to an effect mediated by differences in the plasma insulin concentrations, since our results point toward higher insulin concentrations after the administration of antioxidants, which via PDP activation could delay, but not accelerate, PDH re-phosphorylation.

Another mechanism that could explain a faster re-phosphorylation of PDH during the recovery period after the ingestion of antioxidants is a reduction of the exercise-induced increase in insulin sensitivity by antioxidants (Trewin et al., 2015). Indeed, it has been reported that the increase of insulin sensitivity observed acutely after exercise is augmented in mice lacking the antioxidant enzyme Gpx1, an effect that was abolished by administration of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (Loh et al., 2009). This concurs with the lower post-exercise insulin sensitivity observed in humans who received N-acetylcysteine during exercise (Trewin et al., 2015).

As expected from a greater re-phosphorylation of PDH (i.e., inhibition of PDH) following the ingestion of antioxidants, muscle lactate concentration 30 min after the end of the sprints was almost twice as high after the ingestion of antioxidants. This likely reflects a lower rate of lactate oxidation during the recovery after the ingestion of antioxidants. Lactate oxidation must be preceded by the conversion of lactate into pyruvate and subsequently decarboxylated to acetyl-CoA by the PDH, which after the ingestion of antioxidants is less active (Gladden, 2006). Consequently, to maintain the flow of acetyl groups entering the Krebs cycle and the aerobic ATP resynthesis rate during the first 30–60 min after a sprint exercise preceded by the ingestion of antioxidants, fat oxidation should be increased.

Why was performance not improved by antioxidants, despite the attenuation of muscle lactate accumulation and acidification?

Our findings are at odds with the current paradigm of muscle fatigue (Fitts, 1994; Bangsbo and Juel, 2006), but concur with alternative proposals based on human and animal experiments (Nielsen et al., 2001; Lamb and Stephenson, 2006; Morales-Alamo et al., 2015; Torres-Peralta et al., 2016a,b). Muscle fatigue during high-intensity exercise has been traditionally linked to the activation of glycolysis, the accumulation of lactate and the effects caused by the drop in muscle pH (Fitts, 1994). However, in vitro and animal experiments have shown that both intracellular acidification and lactate accumulation contribute to maintain muscle excitability attenuating fatigue (Westerblad et al., 1991; Allen et al., 1995; Pedersen et al., 2004, 2005). Specifically, lactate can inhibit ClC-1 Cl⁻ channels and increase the excitability and contractile function of depolarized rat muscles (de Paoli et al., 2010). More recently, the ergogenic effect of lactate accumulation has been confirmed in humans, which recovered partly from fatigue during 1 min of completed bilateral leg occlusion applied at the end of an incremental exercise to exhaustion, despite a 19–22% increase of muscle lactate during the ischemic recovery (Morales-Alamo et al., 2015). In the current investigation, peak power output was not affected by either hypoxia or antioxidants, while mean power output was only reduced by 5.3% in hypoxia (all conditions combined), despite a much greater accumulation of muscle lactate. The fact that muscle lactate could accumulate to higher levels with a minor impact on performance agrees with the idea that lactate and acidification is not as detrimental for muscle contraction as classically thought. However, the potential protective effect on muscle excitability by greater lactate accumulation during exercise in severe acute hypoxia was lost when the sprints were preceded by the intake of antioxidants, which reduced the glycolytic rate to values similar to those observed during the sprints performed in normoxia. This had a minor impact on performance and we think that our findings are compatible with mechanisms of task failure localized outside the active skeletal muscles (Calbet et al., 2015; Morales-Alamo et al., 2015; Torres-Peralta et al., 2016a,b).

In summary, this investigation shows that lactate accumulation during sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia is not caused by reduced activation of the PDH, which dephosphorylates to similar levels in normoxia and hypoxia. The ingestion of antioxidants before sprint exercise reduces the glycolytic rate in normoxia and hypoxia without a negative impact on performance, implying that either the activation of glycolysis in hypoxia is excessive and/or the energy cost of muscle contraction is reduced by antioxidants. We have also shown that Ser²⁹³ re-phosphorylates a faster rate during the recovery period than Ser³⁰⁰-PDH-E1α, suggesting slightly different regulatory mechanisms that remain to be identified. Finally, the ingestion of antioxidants is associated with increased PDH re-phosphorylation and slower elimination of muscle lactate during the recovery period.

Author contributions

JAC, DM-A, BG, and CD: Conception and design of the experiments; JAC, DM-A, BG, AS, and CD: Pre-testing, experimental preparation, and data collection; All co-authors: data analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by DM-A and JAC. All co-authors edited and proofread the manuscript and approved the final version.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.