Abstract
A series of optically active hypervalent iodine(III) reagents prepared from the corresponding (R)-2-(2-iodophenoxy)propanoate derivative was employed for the asymmetric dioxytosylation of styrene and its derivatives. The electrophilic addition of the hypervalent iodine(III) compound toward styrene proceeded with high enantioface selectivity to give 1-aryl-1,2-di(tosyloxy)ethane with an enantiomeric excess of 70–96% of the (S)-isomer.
Keywords: 1,2-difunctionalization of alkenes; enantioselective synthesis; hypervalent iodine; oxidation
Findings
Hypervalent aryl-λ3-iodanes have been widely used for metal-free oxidation with high selectivity in organic synthesis [1–3]. The reactivity of an aryl-λ3-iodane is controlled by the electronic and steric properties of the aryl group and the heteroatomic ligand coordinated to the iodine atom. Optically active hypervalent iodine compounds contain chiral ligands or chiral aryl groups. Several types of optically active hypervalent iodine reagents and catalysts have been developed for highly stereocontrolled oxidative transformations [4–14]. The enantioselective vicinal difunctionalization of alkenes constitutes one type of attractive transformation achieved by chiral hypervalent iodine compounds. As a seminal example in this field, Wirth et al. [15–17] reported the dioxytosylation of styrene (1a, Scheme 1). Chiral hypervalent iodine reagents 2 bearing a 1-methoxyethyl side chain were used for enantiocontrol of the dioxytosylation, and the maximum enantiomeric excess (ee) of the product 3a reached 65%. Despite recent rapid progress in the field of asymmetric oxidation achieved by chiral hypervalent iodine compounds, there has been no subsequent examination of dioxytosylation, which can be used as a standard reaction for comparing the enantiocontrolling ability of chiral hypervalent iodine reagents.
The design of chiral hypervalent iodine reagents using a lactate motif has been employed for several types of oxidation reaction since we first reported this procedure [18]. Enantioselective oxidative transformations include the dearomatization of phenols [19–24], α-functionalization of carbonyl compounds [25–29], and vicinal difunctionalization of alkenes [18,30–50]. Here, the efficiency of the lactate-based chiral hypervalent iodine reagents 4a–e (Figure 1) was assessed using the dioxytosylation of styrenes as a reference reaction.
A series of lactate-derived aryl-λ3-iodanes 4a–e was used for the oxidation of styrenes 1 in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH) in dichloromethane. The reaction proceeded at −50 °C to give the 1,2-dioxytosylated product 3 and the rearranged product 5. The yields of 3 and 5 were determined by 1H NMR using an internal standard. The ee of 3 was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. The results for the yields and ee are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Yield (%)b | |||||
Entry | Substrate | Reagent | 3 | 5 | ee of 3 (%)c,d |
1 | 1a (X = H) | 4a | 53 | 15 | 70 (S) |
2 | 1a (X = H) | 4b | 49 | 16 | 80 (S) |
3 | 1a (X = H) | 4c | 41 | 14 | 78 (S) |
4 | 1a (X = H) | 4d | 41 | 22 | 70 (S) |
5 | 1a (X = H) | 4e | 80 | 20 | 92 (S) |
6 | 1b (X = p-Cl)e | 4a | 63 | 6 | 70 |
7 | 1b (X = p-Cl)e | 4b | 46 | 5 | 76 |
8 | 1b (X = p-Cl)e | 4e | 79 | 5 | 90 |
9 | 1c (X = o-Me) | 4a | 7 | 34 | 79 |
10 | 1c (X = o-Me) | 4e | 10 | 35 | 96 |
aThe reaction was carried out at −50 °C in dichloromethane containing 4 (47 mM), TsOH (86 mM), and 1 (43 mM) for 4 h. bThe yield was determined by 1H NMR using an internal standard. cThe ee was determined by chiral HPLC using a Daicel CHIRALPAK AD column (ø 4.6 mm × 250 mm). dPreferential configuration of product 3. The absolute stereochemistry of 3b and 3c was not determined. eThe reaction was carried out for 20 h.
The reaction of styrene (1a) with 4a gave the 1,2-dioxytosylated product 3a with 70% ee of the (S)-isomer (Table 1, entry 1). An ee of equal to or greater than 70% was also achieved in the reactions with the other lactate-based reagents 4b–e (Table 1, entries 2–5). The reaction with the 2,6-bis(lactate)aryl reagent 4e provided a high ee of 92%. The reactions of p-chlorostyrene (1b) gave 3b with a similar ee, and the ratios of 3 to 5 (3b to 5b) were higher than those in the reaction of 1a (Table 1, entries 6–8). In the reactions of o-methylstyrene (1c), the ee of the 1,2-dioxytosylated product 3c was slightly higher than those of 3a and 3b, but the regioselectivity for 3c over 5c was poor (Table 1, entries 9 and 10).
Scheme 2 illustrates possible reaction pathways that lead to 3 and the achiral byproduct 5. The treatment of (diacetoxyiodo)benzene with TsOH readily gives Koser’s reagent [PhI(OH)OTs] [51], which has a higher electrophilicity toward the carbon–carbon double bond in 1. The dioxytosylation of alkenes with Koser’s reagent was found to proceed via an SN2 reaction of a cyclic intermediate such as I1, judging from the syn selectivity of the dioxytosylation [52–53]. The attack of the tosylate ion on I1 possibly takes place at the benzylic position or at the methylene carbon atom. The positive charge of I1 may be stabilized by the aryl group and localized at the benzylic position. This may allow the preferential formation of I3 from I1. If I2 was the major intermediate in the pathway leading to 3, the stereochemical purity of 3 would have decreased owing to the facile elimination of the iodonium group [54] at the benzylic position of I2 (SN1). The high enantiomeric ratio of 3 can be rationalized via a preference for the I1→I3→3 pathway over the I1→I2→3 pathway. The product ratio of 3 to 5 was affected by the ring substituent in styrenes 1: the electron-withdrawing chloro substituent in 1b increased the amount of 3, whereas the electron-donating methyl substituent in 1c decreased the amount of 3. An electron-donating aryl group increases the rate of participation of the aryl group (I3→I4). In other words, a reaction pathway that bifurcates from I3 to 3 and 5 agrees well with the regioselectivity for 3 over 5 observed for the substituted styrenes. The phenonium cation intermediate I4 contains two reaction sites on the ethylene bridge. Electron donation due to the lone pair on the oxygen atom of the internal tosyloxy group may weaken the bond between the tosyloxy-bonded carbon and the quaternary carbon in I4.
The reaction of styrene with 4a–e preferentially gave (S)-3, which forms via an electrophilic addition of the iodane toward the Si face of styrene, followed by an SN2 reaction with the tosylate ion. If an SN1 mechanism were involved in the oxytosylation of I1, the enantiomeric ratio of 3 would decrease owing to the planar structure of the benzylic cation. Thus, the tosylate ion may act as an effective nucleophile for the SN2 reaction of I1. The stereoface-differentiation in the dioxytosylation reaction using the lactate-derived aryl-λ3-iodanes is similar to that in preceding reactions [14], which include the diacetoxylation [38–39,50] and diamination [30,49] of styrene.
In summary, the reaction of styrenes with lactate-derived aryl-λ3-iodanes gave the dioxytosylated product with an ee of 70–96%.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
Financial support from University of Hyogo is gratefully acknowledged.
This article is part of the Thematic Series "Hypervalent iodine chemistry in organic synthesis".
References
- 1.Zhdankin V V. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yoshimura A, Zhdankin V V. Chem Rev. 2016;116:3328–3435. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wirth T, editor. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry. Basel, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ngatimin M, Lupton D W. Aust J Chem. 2010;63:653–658. doi: 10.1071/CH09625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liang H, Ciufolini M A. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:11849–11851. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106127. Angew. Chem.2011,123, 12051–12053. doi:10.1002/ange.201106127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Uyanik M, Ishihara K. J Synth Org Chem, Jpn. 2012;70:1116–1122. doi: 10.5059/yukigoseikyokaishi.70.1116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Parra A, Reboredo S. Chem – Eur J. 2013;19:17244–17260. doi: 10.1002/chem.201302220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Singh F V, Wirth T. Chem – Asian J. 2014;9:950–971. doi: 10.1002/asia.201301582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Romero R M, Wöste T H, Muñiz K. Chem – Asian J. 2014;9:972–983. doi: 10.1002/asia.201301637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harned A M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:4681–4689. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.06.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zheng Z S, Zhang-Negrerie D, Du Y F, Zhao K. Sci China: Chem. 2014;57:189–214. doi: 10.1007/s11426-013-5043-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Berthiol F. Synthesis. 2015;47:587–603. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1379892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Basdevant B, Guilbault A-A, Beaulieu S, Lauriers A J-D, Legault C Y. Pure Appl Chem. 2017;89:781–789. doi: 10.1515/pac-2016-1212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujita M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:4409–4419. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.10.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wirth T, Hirt U H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1997;8:23–26. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4166(96)00469-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hirt U H, Spingler B, Wirth T. J Org Chem. 1998;63:7674–7679. doi: 10.1021/jo980475x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hirt U H, Schuster M F H, French A N, Wiest O G, Wirth T. Eur J Org Chem. 2001:1569–1579. doi: 10.1002/1099-0690(200104)2001:8<1569::AID-EJOC1569>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fujita M, Okuno S, Lee H J, Sugimura T, Okuyama T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:8691–8694. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Uyanik M, Yasui T, Ishihara K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:2175–2177. doi: 10.1002/anie.200907352. Angew. Chem.2010,122, 2221–2223. doi:10.1002/ange.200907352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Uyanik M, Yasui T, Ishihara K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:9215–9218. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303559. Angew. Chem.2013,125, 9385–9388. doi:10.1002/ange.201303559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang D-Y, Xu L, Wu H, Gong L-Z. Chem – Eur J. 2015;21:10314–10317. doi: 10.1002/chem.201501583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yoshida Y, Magara A, Mino T, Sakamoto M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:5103–5107. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.10.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Uyanik M, Sasakura N, Mizuno M, Ishihara K. ACS Catal. 2017;7:872–876. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jain N, Xu S, Ciufolini M A. Chem – Eur J. 2017;23:4542–4546. doi: 10.1002/chem.201700667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mizar P, Wirth T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:5993–5997. doi: 10.1002/anie.201400405. Angew. Chem.2014,126, 6103–6107. doi:10.1002/ange.201400405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu H, He Y-P, Xu L, Zhang D-Y, Gong L-Z. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:3466–3469. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309967. Angew. Chem.2014,126, 3534–3537. doi:10.1002/ange.201309967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Basdevant B, Legault C Y. Org Lett. 2015;17:4918–4921. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Feng Y, Huang R, Hu L, Xiong Y, Coeffard V. Synthesis. 2016;48:2637–2644. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1561442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cao Y, Zhang X, Lin G, Zhang-Negrerie D, Du Y. Org Lett. 2016;18:5580–5583. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muñiz K, Barreiro L, Romero R M, Martínez C. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:4354–4357. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gelis C, Dumoulin A, Bekkaye M, Neuville L, Masson G. Org Lett. 2017;19:278–281. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Qurban J, Elsherbini M, Wirth T. J Org Chem. 2017;82:11872–11876. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shimogaki M, Fujita M, Sugimura T. J Org Chem. 2017;82:11836–11840. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Banik S M, Medley J W, Jacobsen E N. Science. 2016;353:51–54. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Banik S M, Medley J W, Jacobsen E N. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:5000–5003. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b02391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Woerly E, Banik S M, Jacobsen E N. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:13858–13861. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ahmad A, Silva L F., Jr J Org Chem. 2016;81:2174–2181. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b02803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Haubenreisser S, Wöste T H, Martínez C, Ishihara K, Muñiz K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55:413–417. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507180. Angew. Chem.2016,128, 422–426. doi:10.1002/ange.201507180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wöste T H, Muñiz K. Synthesis. 2016;48:816–827. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1561313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mizar P, Niebuhr R, Hutchings M, Farooq U, Wirth T. Chem – Eur J. 2016;22:1614–1617. doi: 10.1002/chem.201504636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brown M, Kumar R, Rehbein J, Wirth T. Chem – Eur J. 2016;22:4030–4035. doi: 10.1002/chem.201504844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shimogaki M, Fujita M, Sugimura T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55:15797–15801. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609110. Angew. Chem.2016,128, 16029–16033. doi:10.1002/ange.201609110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alhalib A, Kamouka S, Moran W J. Org Lett. 2015;17:1453–1456. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Takesue T, Fujita M, Sugimura T, Akutsu H. Org Lett. 2014;16:4634–4637. doi: 10.1021/ol502225p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kong W, Feige P, de Haro T, Nevado C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:2469–2473. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208471. Angew. Chem.2013,125, 2529–2533. doi:10.1002/ange.201208471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Farid U, Malmedy F, Claveau R, Albers L, Wirth T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:7018–7022. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302358. Angew. Chem.2013,125, 7156–7160. doi:10.1002/ange.201302358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fujita M, Mori K, Shimogaki M, Sugimura T. RSC Adv. 2013;3:17717–17725. doi: 10.1039/c3ra43230k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Farid U, Wirth T. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:3462–3465. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107703. Angew. Chem.2012,124, 3518–3522. doi:10.1002/ange.201107703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Röben C, Souto J A, González Y, Lishchynskyi A, Muñiz K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:9478–9482. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103077. Angew. Chem.2011,123, 9650–9654. doi:10.1002/ange.201103077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fujita M, Wakita M, Sugimura T. Chem Commun. 2011;47:3983–3985. doi: 10.1039/c1cc10129c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Koser G F, Wettach R H. J Org Chem. 1977;42:1476–1478. doi: 10.1021/jo00428a052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Koser G F, Rebrovic L, Wettach R H. J Org Chem. 1981;46:4324–4326. doi: 10.1021/jo00334a057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rebrovic L, Koser G F. J Org Chem. 1984;49:2462–2472. doi: 10.1021/jo00187a032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Okuyama T, Takino T, Sueda T, Ochiai M. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:3360–3367. doi: 10.1021/ja00117a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.