Skip to main content
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry logoLink to Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
. 2018 Mar 14;14:626–633. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.14.49

Sequential Ugi reaction/base-induced ring closing/IAAC protocol toward triazolobenzodiazepine-fused diketopiperazines and hydantoins

Robby Vroemans 1,#, Fante Bamba 1,2,#, Jonas Winters 1, Joice Thomas 1, Jeroen Jacobs 3, Luc Van Meervelt 3, Jubi John 1,4,, Wim Dehaen 1,
Editor: Ian R Baxendale
PMCID: PMC5870159  PMID: 29623124

Abstract

A practical three-step protocol for the assembly of triazolobenzodiazepine-fused diketopiperazines and hydantoins has been developed. The synthesis of these tetracyclic ring systems was initiated by an Ugi reaction, which brought together all necessary functionalities for further transformations. The Ugi adducts were then subjected to a base-induced ring closing and an intramolecular azide–alkyne cycloaddition reaction in succession to obtain highly fused benzodiazepine frameworks.

Keywords: benzodiazepine; 2,5-diketopiperazine; hydantoin; intramolecular azide–alkyne cycloaddition; Ugi reaction

Introduction

The versatile bioactivities of multiring-fused heterocyclic scaffolds continue to attract significant attention in developing new methods for their synthesis. A plethora of functionalized fused heterocycles can be easily accessed by designing sequential organic transformations incorporating multicomponent reactions [12] combined with secondary transformations [311]. Over the past decade, several groups of chemists interested in synthetic chemistry have efficiently utilized the strategy of linking multicomponent reactions with intramolecular azide–alkyne cycloaddition (IAAC) for the generation of triazole-fused heterocycles [1223]. In this report we disclose our results on the development of a sequential synthetic approach involving Ugi 4-component reaction (4-CR) and two ring-closing steps toward triazolobenzodiazepine-fused diketopiperazines and hydantoins.

Benzodiazepine derivatives [2425] form an important class of ‘psychoactive drugs’ which is being extensively used in the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, agitation, seizures, muscle spasms, alcohol withdrawal, etc. [2634]. In addition, these azaheterocycles also exhibit anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antiparasitic and anxiolytic activities [3542]. In particular, 1,4-benzodiazepine derivatives are proposed to serve as a structural mimic of peptide β-turns [4345] and are also known to bind to a number of biological targets [4648]. Interestingly, the fusion of a triazole ring to a 1,4-benzodiazepine core has resulted in an increase in the biological activity as evident from the different drugs with triazolobenzodiazepine structure such as alprazolam, etizolam, triazolam, etc., available for the treatment of CNS related ailments (Figure 1) [4955].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Triazolobenzodiazepine drugs.

Another set of heterocycles are 2,5-diketopiperazines, which form the core structure of many natural products and have recently been thoroughly studied for their wide spectrum of biological activities [5658]. Owing to our interest in the chemistry of 1,2,3-triazoles [5972] and the interesting biological activities of benzodiazepines and 2,5-diketopiperazines, we were motivated to develop a facile route towards multiring-fused derivatives incorporating all these heterocyclic moieties. We hypothesized that 2,5-diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine could be obtained by proper functionalization of building blocks starting with an Ugi reaction; followed by two ring-closing steps, one being a base-induced heterocycle formation and the other an IAAC. Unlike some of the reported strategies using Cu-catalyzed IAAC [13,15], we postulated that the intramolecular dipolar cycloaddition would proceed under thermal conditions (metal-free) due to the close proximity of the azide and similar functionalities in the intermediate. The functionalities required for the secondary transformations like the leaving group (-Cl) for nucleophilic substitution, alkyne and azide for IAAC can be assembled via the Ugi reaction (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Retrosynthetic analysis towards 2,5-diketopiperazine fused triazolobenzodiazepine.

Results and Discussion

We initiated our studies with the Ugi 4-component reaction of o-azidobenzaldehyde (1a), propargylamine (2a), 2-chloroacetic acid (3a) and benzyl isocyanide (4a, Scheme 2). Initially, the condensation of the aldehyde and the amine was effected in MeOH in the presence of 4 Å MS. This was followed by the sequential addition of chloroacetic acid and the isocyanide which, after 24 hours at room temperature, afforded the expected Ugi adduct 5a in 96% yield.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Ugi 4-CR reaction.

The synthesis of fused heterocycles from the Ugi adduct 5a was attempted via two routes (Scheme 3). The first route involved the base-induced cyclisation of 5a at the amide end by treatment with KOH from which the diketopiperazine moiety 6 was obtained in 51% yield. Compound 6 bearing azide and alkyne functionalities was subjected to intramolecular azide–alkyne cycloaddition (IAAC) in EtOH at reflux conditions which afforded the target diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 7a in 81% yield. The secondary path commenced with the intramolecular azide–alkyne cycloaddition of 5a which furnished the triazole-fused benzodiazepine 8 in 72% yield after 3 hours. The triazolobenzodiazepine 8 was then subjected to base-induced cyclisation with KOH which failed to afford the expected tetracyclic compound 7a. We believe that conformational restrictions prevent the side chains on the benzodiazepine bearing the amide and halogen to be in close proximity, which is needed for the reaction to proceed.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 7a.

The generality of the developed fused-heterocycle synthesis was studied with substituted azidoaldehyde, isocyanides and chloroacetic acid (Figure 2, see Supporting Information File 1 for full experimental data). In all the cases, the Ugi adduct precipitated from the reaction mixture within 24 hours, which was filtered, washed, dried and used as such without further purification. For all the examples, the ring-closing reactions were done in one-pot; which involved neutralization after base-induced diketopiperazine synthesis and dilution with EtOH before the IAAC step. Our first attempt was to study the effect of different substituents on the isocyanide (4ad) moiety; from which we observed a slight decrease in the yield of the final product with increase in steric bulk of the substituent. Hence, an overall yield (over 3 steps) of 37% was obtained for benzyl-substituted polycyclic compound 7a, 34% for 7b (cyclohexyl) and 27% for 7c (tert-butyl). p-Methoxyphenyl-substituted compound 7d was obtained in a good overall yield of 67%. Next, we investigated the effect of the substitution pattern on the propargylamine 2. For this, we chose easily available propargylamines 2b and 2c which gave moderate to good yields (60 and 40%, respectively) of diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 7e and 7f. Furthermore, halogen substituents were introduced on polyfused heterocycles 7 because these were shown to often have a positive effect on the bioactivity (see compounds in Figure 1). Starting with 2-azido-4-bromobenzaldehyde (1b), we were able to prepare two brominated tetracyclic derivatives 7g and 7h. In the same way, we were also successful in synthesizing chloro derivatives 7i and 7j from 2-azido-4-chlorobenzaldehyde (1c). The multiring-fused heterocycle synthesis was also tried with an azidobenzaldehyde bearing electron-donating substituents; the reaction with 2-azido-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (1d) yielded the product 7k in lesser yield (43%). Finally, an additional stereocenter was introduced in the diketopiperazine ring by carrying out the Ugi reaction with 2-chloropropanoic acid (3b). After the sequential ring-closing steps the expected diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 7l was obtained in 41% yield as a 1:0.7 inseparable mixture of diastereomers. Various attempts were made with other azidobenzaldehydes (5-azido-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde, 2-azidoquinoline-3-carbaldehyde and 2-azido-5-nitrobenzaldehyde) and isocyanides (2-morpholinoethyl isocyanide) towards the synthesis of diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 7mp. All of the mentioned substrates gave their respective Ugi adducts but the latter decomposed under basic treatment (in the case of 2-azidoquinoline-3-carbaldehyde, 2-azido-5-nitrobenzaldehyde, 2-morpholinoethyl isocyanide) or decomposed under refluxing conditions (in the case of 5-azido-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Generality in the synthesis of diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 7. Reaction conditions: 1. 2-azidobenzaldehyde 1 (1.85 mmol), propargylamine 2 (1.85 mmol), chloroacetic acid 3 (1.85 mmol), benzyl isocyanide 4 (1.85 mmol), 4 Å MS (100 mg), EtOH (7 mL), 20 h, rt; 2. Ugi adduct 5 (0.26 mmol), KOH (0.28 mmol), ethanol (1.5 mL), sonication for 30 minutes, rt; 3. neutralization with 1 M HCl, EtOH (20 mL) reflux, 3 h. Overall yields for 3 steps are given for all the examples.

The success in the synthesis of diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepine prompted us to examine the possibility of making the sequential synthetic route in ‘one-pot’ starting from the Ugi 4-CR (Scheme 4). Thus we initiated the reaction sequence from the Ugi reaction in EtOH, after completion of which, the ring-closing steps (base induced and IAAC) were performed in succession. Unfortunately, the final products were obtained in slightly lower yields; 30% for 7a and 26% for 7b, respectively.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

‘One-pot’ synthesis of diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepines 7a and 7b.

Hydantoins belong to a unique class of heterocycles which can be found in a number of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, insecticides, etc. [7375]. These cyclic ureides are well known for their anticonvulsant activity [7678]. With the assumption that these molecules when fused to a benzodiazepine core would enhance the anticonvulsant activity, we undertook the synthesis of hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepines starting from the Ugi reaction of o-azidobenzaldehyde (1a), propargylamine (2a), trichloroacetic acid (9) and benzyl isocyanide (4a, Scheme 5). The Ugi adduct was subjected to base-induced ring closing with NaOEt in EtOH which furnished the hydantoin intermediates; which on subsequent neutralization–dilution–IAAC afforded the expected hydantoin-fused benzodiazepine derivative 10a in 45% overall yield. In a similar way the cyclohexyl and p-methoxyphenyl-substituted compounds 10b and 10c were obtained in 82% and 62% overall yield, respectively.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 10. Reaction conditions: 1. 2-azidobenzaldehyde 1 (1.85 mmol), propargylamine (2a, 1.85 mmol), trichloroacetic acid (9, 1.85 mmol), benzyl isocyanide 4 (1.85 mmol), 4 Å MS (100 mg), EtOH (7 mL), 20 h, rt; 2. Ugi adduct 5 (0.26 mmol), NaOEt (0.28 mmol), ethanol (1.5 mL), 30 min, rt; 3. neutralization with 1 M HCl, EtOH (20 mL) reflux, 3 h. Overall yields for 3 steps are given for all the examples.

The structure of hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepine was confirmed by a X-ray crystal structure determination of 10a (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

X-ray crystal structure of hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepine 10a. (Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.)

The three-step synthesis of heterocycle-fused triazolobenzodiazepines involves the well-known Ugi 4-CR as the first step and the IAAC as the last, the mechanisms of which are well established (Scheme 6). The second stage is the base-induced ring closing of the Ugi adduct A and D to the respective heterocycles. In the case of Ugi adduct A, the base (KOH) abstracts the amide hydrogen which attacks the methylene carbon (expelling a chloride ion) and thereby furnishing the 2,5-diketopiperazine ring C. On the other hand, in the case of Ugi adduct D, a base induced intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the amide N-atom to the carbonyl carbon occurs (in intermediate E) and the hydantoin ring F forms by the elimination of the trichloromethyl anion.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Mechanism of formation of diketopiperazine and hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepines.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a sequential synthetic strategy to access diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepines from simple starting materials. It is noteworthy to mention that halogenated (chloro and bromo) benzodiazepines could be synthesized following the developed protocol which might show analogues biological activity as that of halogenated triazolobenzodiazepine drugs available in market. We could also extend the strategy for the synthesis of hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepines, other valuable multiring-fused heterocycles which might also exhibit potent bioactivities. The synthesized compounds are currently being evaluated for their biological properties, the results of which will be reported in due course.

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information features further experimental details, copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 5a, 6, 8, diketopiperazine-fused triazolobenzodiazepines 7 and hydantoin-fused triazolobenzodiazepines 10, and X-ray crystal structure details of 10a.

File 1

Experimental part.

Acknowledgments

We thank the KU Leuven for financial support. Mass spectrometry was made possible by the support of the Hercules Foundation of the Flemish Government (grant 20100225-7). RV thanks the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek – Vlaanderen (FWO) for a Ph.D. fellowship (1S13516N). JJ thanks the Department of Science and Technology (DST)-SERB, India, for a Young Scientist Start-Up Research Grant (SB/FT/CS-107/2014). LVM thanks the Hercules Foundation for supporting the purchase of the diffractometer (grant AKUL/09/0035).

Contributor Information

Jubi John, Email: jubijohn@niist.res.in.

Wim Dehaen, Email: wim.dehaen@chem.kuleuven.be.

References

  • 1.Zhu J, Bienaymé H, editors. Multicomponent Reactions. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brauch S, van Berkel S S, Westermann B. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:4948–4962. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35505e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marcaccini S, Pepino R, Pozo M C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:2727–2728. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00232-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marcaccini S, Miliciani M, Pepino R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:711–713. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.11.083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ignacio J M, Macho S, Marcaccini S, Pepino R, Torroba T. Synlett. 2005:3051–3054. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-922745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marcaccini S, Torroba T. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:632–639. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sunderhaus J D, Dockendorff C, Martin S F. Org Lett. 2007;9:4223–4226. doi: 10.1021/ol7018357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hardy S, Martin S F. Org Lett. 2011;13:3102–3105. doi: 10.1021/ol201010s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sañudo M, Garcia-Valverde M, Marcaccini S, Torroba T. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:2621–2629. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2012.01.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Granger B A, Wang Z, Kaneda K, Fang Z, Martin S F. ACS Comb Sci. 2013;15:379–386. doi: 10.1021/co400055b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moni L, Banfi L, Basso A, Carcone L, Rasparini M, Riva R. J Org Chem. 2015;80:3411–3428. doi: 10.1021/jo502829j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akritopoulou-Zanze I, Gracias V, Djuric S W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:8439–8441. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.09.117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gracias V, Darczak D, Gasiecki A F, Djuric S W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:9053–9056. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.10.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pirali T, Tron G C, Zhu J. Org Lett. 2006;8:4145–4148. doi: 10.1021/ol061782p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bahulayan D, Arun S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:2850–2855. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.03.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dhondge A P, Afraj S N, Nuzlia C, Chen C, Lee G-H. Eur J Org Chem. 2013:4119–4130. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201300226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nguyen H H, Palazzo T A, Kurth M J. Org Lett. 2013;15:4492–4495. doi: 10.1021/ol402045h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Subba Reddy B V, Majumder N, Prabhakar Rao T. Synthesis. 2014;46:3408–3414. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1379031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.De Moliner F, Bigatti M, De Rosa C, Banfi L, Riva R, Basso A. Mol Diversity. 2014;18:473–482. doi: 10.1007/s11030-014-9530-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Moliner F, Bigatti M, Banfi L, Riva R, Basso A. Org Lett. 2014;16:2280–2283. doi: 10.1021/ol500813p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barlow T M A, Jida M, Tourwé D, Ballet S. Org Biomol Chem. 2014;12:6986–6989. doi: 10.1039/C4OB01381F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Salvador C E M, Pieber B, Neu P M, Torvisco A, Andrade C K Z, Kappe C O. J Org Chem. 2015;80:4590–4602. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raj P J, Bahulayan D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;56:2451–2455. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.03.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Keating T A, Armstrong R W. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:2574–2583. doi: 10.1021/ja953868b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Keating T A, Armstrong R W. J Org Chem. 1996;61:8935–8939. doi: 10.1021/jo961517p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Attwood D, Gibson J. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1978;30:176–180. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1978.tb13192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chakrabarti J K, Hotten T M, Pullar I A, Steggles D J. J Med Chem. 1989;32:2375–2381. doi: 10.1021/jm00130a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hsu M C, Schutt A D, Holly M, Slice L W, Sherman M I, Richman D D, Potash M J, Volsky D J. Science. 1991;254:1799–1802. doi: 10.1126/science.1763331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liegeois J F F, Bruhwyler J, Damas J, Nguyen T P, Chleide E M G, Mercier M G A, Rogister F A, Delarge J E. J Med Chem. 1993;36:2107–2114. doi: 10.1021/jm00067a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liegeois J F F, Rogister F A, Bruhwyler J, Damas J, Nguyen T P, Inarejos M O, Chleide E M G, Mercier M G A, Delarge J E. J Med Chem. 1994;37:519–525. doi: 10.1021/jm00030a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ballard C G, O'Brien J T, Swann A G, Thompson P, Neill D, McKeith I G. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:46. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v62n0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nierenberg A A, Gray S M, Grandin L D. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(Suppl 25):27–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hanley D F, Jr, Pozo M. Int J Clin Pract. 2000;54:30–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zahradník I, Minarovič I, Zahradníková A. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;324:977–984. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.132456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Coyne W E, Cusic J W. J Med Chem. 1967;10:541–546. doi: 10.1021/jm00316a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wright W B, Jr, Brabander H J, Greenblatt E N, Day I P, Hardy R A., Jr J Med Chem. 1978;21:1087–1089. doi: 10.1021/jm00208a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Horton D A, Bourne G T, Smythe M L. Chem Rev. 2003;103:893–930. doi: 10.1021/cr020033s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kamal A, Shetti R V C R N C, Ramaiah M J, Swapna P, Reddy K S, Mallareddy A, Rao M P N, Chourasia M, Sastry G N, Juvekar A, et al. MedChemComm. 2011;2:780–788. doi: 10.1039/c1md00072a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gill R K, Kaushik S O, Chugh J, Bansal S, Shah A, Bariwal J. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2014;14:229–256. doi: 10.2174/13895575113139990081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vitaku E, Smith D T, Njardarson J T. J Med Chem. 2014;57:10257–10274. doi: 10.1021/jm501100b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Maheshwari N, Goyal A, Jain S, Jain D, Moorthy N S H N. Med Chem Res. 2014;23:765–774. doi: 10.1007/s00044-013-0675-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thurston D E, Vassoler H, Jackson P J M, James C H, Rahman K M. Org Biomol Chem. 2015;13:4031–4040. doi: 10.1039/C4OB02405B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ripka W C, De Lucca G V, Bach A C, II, Pottorf R S, Blaney J M. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:3593–3608. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)90217-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ripka A S, Rich D H. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1998;2:441–452. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(98)80119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hata M, Marshall G R. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2006;20:321–331. doi: 10.1007/s10822-006-9059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mohler H, Okada T. Science. 1977;198:849–851. doi: 10.1126/science.918669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Braestrup C, Schmiechen R, Neef G, Nielsen M, Petersen E N. Science. 1982;216:1241–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.6281892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rudolph U, Knoflach F. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2011;10:685–697. doi: 10.1038/nrd3502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Scharf M B, Roth P B, Dominguez R A, Ware J C. J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;30:461–467. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1990.tb03486.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Post G L, Patrick R O, Crowder J E, Houston J, Ferguson J M, Bielski R J, Bailey L, Pearlman H G, Shu V S, Pierce M W. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991;11:249–253. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199108000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gerecke M, Kyburz E, Borer R, Gassner W. Heterocycles. 1994;39:693–721. doi: 10.3987/COM-94-S(B)61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Levine J, Cole D P, Chengappa K N R, Gershon S. Depression Anxiety. 2001;14:94–104. doi: 10.1002/da.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Snyder P J, Werth J, Giordani B, Caveney A F, Feltner D, Maruff P. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 2005;20:263–273. doi: 10.1002/hup.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alajarín M, Cabrera J, Pastor A, Villalgordo J M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:3495–3499. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.03.121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mohapatra D K, Maity P K, Shabab M, Khan M I. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:5241–5245. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.06.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Martins M B, Carvalho I. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:9923–9932. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.04.105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hulme C, Morrissette M M, Volz F A, Burns C J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:1113–1116. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(97)10795-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nixey T, Kelly M, Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:8729–8733. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01563-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Merckx T, Verwilst P, Dehaen W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013;54:4237–4240. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.05.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thomas J, John J, Parekh N, Dehaen W. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:10155–10159. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Efimov I, Bakulev V, Beliaev N, Beryozkina T, Knippschild U, Leban J, Zhi-Jin F, Eltsov O, Slepukhin P, Ezhikova M, et al. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:3684–3689. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201402130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Merckx T, Haynes C J E, Karagiannidis L E, Clarke H J, Holder K, Kelly A, Tizzard G J, Coles S J, Verwilst P, Gale P A, et al. Org Biomol Chem. 2015;13:1654–1661. doi: 10.1039/C4OB02236J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.John J, Thomas J, Parekh N, Dehaen W. Eur J Org Chem. 2015:4922–4930. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201500459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Beryozkina T V, Efimov I V, Fabian W M F, Beliaev N A, Slepukhin P A, Isenov M L, Dehaen W, Lubec G, Eltsov O S, Fan Z, et al. Tetrahedron. 2015;71:6189–6195. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.06.088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.John J, Thomas J, Dehaen W. Chem Commun. 2015;51:10797–10806. doi: 10.1039/C5CC02319J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Thomas J, Jana S, John J, Liekens S, Dehaen W. Chem Commun. 2016;52:2885–2888. doi: 10.1039/C5CC08347H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Verbelen B, Dehaen W. Org Lett. 2016;18:6412–6415. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Thomas J, Goyvaerts V, Liekens S, Dehaen W. Chem – Eur J. 2016;22:9966–9970. doi: 10.1002/chem.201601928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jana S, Thomas J, Dehaen W. J Org Chem. 2016;81:12426–12432. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jalani H B, Karagöz A C, Tsogoeva S V. Synthesis. 2016;49:29–41. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1588904. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Raiguel S, Depuydt D, Vander Hoogerstraete T, Thomas J, Dehaen W, Binnemans K. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:5269–5278. doi: 10.1039/C7DT00624A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jana S, Iram S, Thomas J, Hayat M Q, Pannecouque C, Dehaen W. Molecules. 2017;22:303. doi: 10.3390/molecules22020303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ware E. Chem Rev. 1950;46:403–470. doi: 10.1021/cr60145a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Avendaño López C, González Trigo G. Adv Heterocycl Chem. 1985;38:177–228. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2725(08)60920-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Meusel M, Gütschow M. Org Prep Proced Int. 2004;36:391–443. doi: 10.1080/00304940409356627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mehta N B, Diuguid C A R, Soroko F E. J Med Chem. 1981;24:465–468. doi: 10.1021/jm00136a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kutt H, Harden C L. Phenytoin and Congeners. In: Eadie M J, Vajda F J E, editors. Antiepileptic Drugs. Vol. 138. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999. pp. 229–265. ((Handb. Exp. Pharmacol.)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rogawski M A, Löscher W. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:553–564. doi: 10.1038/nrn1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File 1

Experimental part.


Articles from Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Beilstein-Institut

RESOURCES