Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2017 Dec 13;8(12):3206. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0110-8

RIPK3 promotes adenovirus type 5 activity

Melanie Weigert 1,#, Alex Binks 1,#, Suzanne Dowson 1, Elaine Y L Leung 1, Dimitris Athineos 2, Xinzi Yu 1, Margaret Mullin 3, Josephine B Walton 1, Clare Orange 1, Darren Ennis 1, Karen Blyth 1,2, Stephen W G Tait, Iain A McNeish 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5870599  PMID: 29238045

Abstract

Oncolytic adenoviral mutants infect human malignant cells and replicate selectively within them. This induces direct cytotoxicity that can also trigger profound innate and adaptive immune responses. However, the mechanism by which adenoviruses produce cell death remains uncertain. We previously suggested that type 5 adenoviruses, including the E1A CR2 deletion mutant dl922-947, might induce a novel form of programmed death resembling necroptosis. Here we have investigated the roles of core necrosis proteins RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL in the cytotoxicity of dl922-947 and other adenovirus serotypes. By electron microscopy, we show that dl922-947 induces similar necrotic morphology as TSZ treatment (TNF-α, Smac mimetic, zVAD.fmk). However, dl922-947-mediated death is independent of TNF-α signalling, does not require RIPK1 and does not rely upon the presence of MLKL. However, inhibition of caspases, specifically caspase-8, induces necroptosis that is RIPK3 dependent and significantly enhances dl922-947 cytotoxicity. Moreover, using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, we demonstrate that the increase in cytotoxicity seen upon caspase inhibition is also MLKL dependent. Even in the absence of caspase inhibition, RIPK3 expression promotes dl922-947 and wild-type adenovirus type 5 efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Together, these results suggest that adenovirus induces a form of programmed necrosis that differs from classical TSZ necroptosis.

Introduction

Oncolytic viruses are a promising new therapy for cancer. They can infect cancer cells, multiply selectively within them and cause cell death, with release of mature viral particles that infect neighbouring cells. We have previously shown that the E1A CR2-deleted adenovirus type 5 mutant dl922-947 has considerable activity in ovarian cancer and is more potent than both E1A wild-type adenoviruses and the E1B-55K mutant dl1520 (Onyx-015)1,2. We have also shown that dl922-947 induces robust DNA double-strand break damage in infected cells3 and utilises components of the homologous recombination pathway to promote efficacy4.

The exact mechanisms by which adenoviruses cause cell death remain uncertain. We previously showed that classical apoptosis is not the primary mode of cell death following E1A CR2-deleted adenovirus infection in ovarian cancer and that autophagy was likely to be a survival mechanism5. Our overall conclusion was that adenovirus cytotoxicity had the features of a programmed necrotic process.

Necrosis is now realised to be a highly regulated form of cell death6. The best-characterised pathway of programmed necrosis (or necroptosis) occurs when tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α (T) binds to TNFR1 in the presence of a Smac-mimetic (S) and the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD.fmk (Z). The critical step in TSZ-induced necroptosis is the formation of the necrosome, a complex that includes RIPK1 and RIPK3, both of which contain RHIM (RIP homotypic interaction motif) domains. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) then binds to RIPK3 through its C-terminal kinase-like domain, which is phosphorylated at T357/S358 by RIPK3, leading to its activation and translocation to the cell membrane, where it is involved in the formation of pores, ion influx and membrane disruption7,8. Other pathways of programmed necrotic death exist that are independent of the TNF-α/TNFR interaction—Tenev et al. and Feoktiskova et al. described the ripoptosome, a death-inducing complex that forms upon genotoxic stress and that leads to caspase-dependent apoptosis or caspase-independent necrosis depending upon both cellular caspase-8 activity9,10 and the levels and cleavage state of cFLIP (reviewed in ref.11). Similarly, necrosome-like complexes can also form as a result of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling12 in response to lipopolysaccharide13 and poly(I:C)14. In addition, RIPK3 can induce necrosis independently of RIPK1 and MLKL; for example, following ischaemia/reperfusion injury or doxorubicin treatment, RIPK3 induces necrotic death in cardiac myocytes by binding directly to and activating CaMKII (calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase)15.

Multiple viruses trigger RIPK1/RIPK3-dependent responses, including vaccinia16,17, murine cytomegalovirus18 and influenza A19. In herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 infection, ICP6 binds to RIPK1/RIPK3 in both human and murine cells, which triggers a necrotic response in mouse20 but suppresses necrosis in human cells21.

Here we have investigated the roles of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL in the cytotoxicity of dl922-947 and other adenovirus serotypes. We show that adenovirus induces similar necrotic morphology to TSZ. However, cytotoxicity is independent of TNF-α signalling and RIPK1 and does not rely upon the presence of MLKL. RIPK3 expression augments adenovirus efficacy, while caspase-8 inhibition can significantly enhance activity in a RIPK3- and MLKL-dependent manner. These results suggest that adenovirus induces a form of programmed necrosis that differs from classical TSZ necroptosis.

Results

Induction of necroptosis in tumour cells

We first investigated the expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, caspase-8 and MLKL in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines as well as HeLa cells (Fig. 1a). Only TOV21G cells expressed all three proteins in equal quantities and were sensitive to necroptosis induced by TSZ (TNF-α, Smac mimetic, zVAD.fmk) that was reversible by treatment with necrostatin-1 and necrosulphonamide (NSA) (Fig. 1b). We evaluated the sensitivity of TOV21G and two TSZ-resistant lines, OVCAR4 and HeLa, to the E1A CR2-deleted Ad5 vector dl922-947 as well as wild-type adenovirus of different serotypes (Fig. 1c). As we have noted previously22, TOV21G was consistently the most sensitive line. By electron microscopy, the morphology of dl922-947-treated cells was similar to morphology of those treated with TSZ, with swollen mitochondria, cytoplasmic disintegration and loss of membrane integrity (Fig. 1d, Fig. S1), in keeping with a necrotic process. In addition, assessment by flow cytometry with a membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye showed progressive loss of membrane integrity following dl922-947 infection in both TOV21G and OVCAR4 cells (Fig. S2)

Fig. 1. Induction of necrosis in ovarian cancer cells.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a Expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, caspase-8 and MLKL was assessed in ovarian cancer cells and HeLa by immunoblot. b OVCAR4, TOV21G and HeLa cells were treated with TNF-α (T, 20 ng/ml), the Smac-mimetic LCL-161 (S, 1 μM) and/or zVAD.fmk (Z, 25 µM) for 6 h in the presence and absence of necrostatin-1 (Nec, 10 µM) and necrosulfonamide (NSA, 1 µM). Arrows indicate necrosis induced by TSZ in TOV21G cells, reversed by Nec and NSA. Cell survival was assessed by MTT assay. c OVCAR4, TOV21G and HeLa cells were infected with dl922-947, Ad5, Ad35 and Ad11p (MOI 0.01–1000 pfu/cell) for 120 h. Cell survival was assessed by MTT assay. d Transmission electron microscopic images of TOV21G cells following 6 h treatment with TSZ (concentrations as 1B) or 48 h infection with dl922-947 (MOI 1). White arrows indicate sites of membrane rupture; black arrows indicate electron-dense mitochondria

dl922-947-induced necrosis does not result from local TNF-α production nor is RIPK1 involved

Infection with dl922-947 was not associated with marked changes in the expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL (Fig. 2a) or caspase-8 (Fig. S3). Inhibition of TNF-α using a blocking antibody had no effect on dl922-947 activity (Fig. 2b), while treatment with necrostatin-1 (Fig. 2c, Fig. S4) and the RIPK1 inhibitors GSK3002962A and GSK3002963A (Fig. 2d, Fig. S5) also had no effect on virus efficacy. Finally, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated RIPK1 knockdown also did not inhibit dl922-947 activity (Fig. 2e). Thus we conclude that virus-induced death does not rely upon either TNF-α or RIPK1.

Fig. 2. RIPK1 plays no role in dl922-947-induced cytotoxicity.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a Expression of core necrosis proteins RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL following dl922-947 infection was assessed in OVCAR4 (MOI 10) and TOV21G (MOI 1) cells. b OVCAR4 and TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 in the presence and absence of blocking anti-TNF-α Ab (1 µg/ml). Cell survival was assessed after 120 h by MTT assay. c Necrostatin-1 (10 µM) treatment has no effect on dl922-947 cytotoxicity in OVCAR4 and TOV21G cells. Each dot represents IC50 from a single triplicate experiment. d OVCAR4 and TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 in the presence and absence of blocking RIPK1 inhibitors GSK3002962A and GSK2003963A (both 10 nM). Cell survival was assessed after 120 h by MTT assay. e RIPK1 knockdown in TOV21G cells (left) 24 h following transfection with 10–100 pmol siRNA. 10 pmol RIPK1 siRNA significantly reduced TSZ-induced cell death. Adenovirus cytotoxicity experiments (right) utilised 10 pmol siRNA. Cells were infected with dl922-947 24 h following siRNA transfection. Cell survival was assessed 120 h thereafter

MLKL is not an absolute requirement for dl922-947-induced cytotoxicity

MLKL is the critical final mediator of necrotic cell death following multiple stimuli, including TSZ treatment. Following dl922-947 infection, we saw re-localisation of MLKL from the nucleus to the cell membrane (Fig. 3a), which is required for MLKL-induced necrosis23. Furthermore, we saw a small but significant and dose-dependent inhibition of dl922-947 activity following treatment with the MLKL inhibitor NSA that was similar in both TSZ-sensitive TOV21G cells and TSZ-resistant OVCAR4 (Fig. 3b). This initially suggested that MLKL may be involved in dl922-947-mediated cell death. However, we were unable to detect any MLKL phosphorylation following dl922-947 infection (Fig. 3c; see also Fig. S14). In addition, siRNA-mediated MLKL knockdown have no significant effect on virus efficacy but completely abrogated TSZ cytotoxicity (Fig. 3d). We therefore concluded that MLKL is not an absolute requirement for the death induced by adenovirus type 5.

Fig. 3. MLKL is not essential for dl922-947-induced cytotoxicity.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a MLKL relocalises to the plasma membrane in TOV21G following dl922-947 infection (MOI 1, 48 h). b Necrosulphonamide (NSA) treatment significantly inhibits dl922-947 cytotoxicity in OVCAR4 and TOV21G cells. Each dot represents IC50 from a single triplicate experiment. NSA concentrations were 0, 3 and 10 µM. ***p < 0.001 for linear trend across NSA concentrations. c MLKL phosphorylation was assessed in TOV21G cells following TSZ (6 h) or dl922-947 (MOI 1, 48 h) treatment by immunoblot. d MLKL knockdown in TOV21G cells (left) up to 144 h following transfection with 10 pmol siRNA. Adenovirus and TSZ cytotoxicity experiments (right). Cells were treated with TSZ or with dl922-947 24 h following siRNA transfection. Cell survival was assessed 6 h (TSZ) and 120 h (dl922-947) thereafter. ***p < 0.001

RIPK3 expression augments efficacy in vitro

We focussed next upon RIPK3, a critical kinase in both apoptosis and necrotic cell death. Following retroviral transduction, we generated a series of HeLa clones expressing RIPK3 (Fig. 4a, Fig. S6). Expression of RIPK3 increased sensitivity to TSZ, which was reversible by NSA treatment (Fig. 4a). These RIPK3 clones were also significantly more sensitive to cytotoxicity mediated by dl922-947 (Fig. 4b, Fig. S7) and Ad5 wild type (Fig. S8), although not by Ad11p (Fig. S9). Sensitivity to dl922-947 correlated significantly with the extent of RIPK3 expression (Fig. 4c) and was not affected by treatment with NSA (Fig. 4d) or RIPK1 inhibition (Fig. S10). However, sensitivity was reversed by the RIPK3 inhibitor GSK2791840B (Fig. 4e, Fig. S5). Expression of RIPK3 did not alter the expression of other core necrosis proteins (Fig. 4f) nor did it increase viral protein expression or viral replication (Fig. 4g). However, siRNA-mediated RIPK3 knockdown in TOV21G cells significantly reduced viral cytotoxicity as well as TSZ-induced death (Fig. 4h), Together, these results suggest that RIPK3 activity can augment efficacy of adenoviruses. Double siRNA for RIPK1 and RIPK3 in TOV21G cells induced significant toxicity (data not shown), so it was not possible to assess whether loss of both kinases influenced viral activity.

Fig. 4. RIPK3 expression augments dl922-947-induced cytotoxicity in vitro.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

a Following retroviral transduction, HeLa-RIPK3 single-cell clones were isolated. LZRS control clone was also isolated. RIPK3 expression (left) and sensitivity to NSA-reversible TSZ necrosis (right) were assessed. b HeLa-RIPK3 clones were significantly more sensitivity to dl922-947 than control LZRS. Each dot represents IC50 for each clone from a triplicate dose–response experiment. *p < 0.05. c Correlation between RIPK3 expression and dl922-947 sensitivity. Relative RIPK3 expression was quantified in HeLa-RIPK3 clones (red) and HeLa-LZRS cells (blue) from multiple immunoblots and correlated with dl922-947 IC50 values. d Treatment with 3 µM NSA has no effect on dl922-947 efficacy in HeLa-LZRS or HeLa-RIPK3 D2 cells. Each dot represents IC50 from a triplicate dose–response experiment. e Treatment with specific RIPK3 inhibitor GSK2791840B (10 nM) inhibited dl922-947 cytotoxicity in HeLa-RIPK3 (clone D2) but not HeLa-LZRS. f Expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, caspase-8 and MLKL was assessed in HeLa-LZRS and HeLa-RIPK3 D2 and E4 cells. g Expression of adenovirus proteins (left) and generation of infectious virions (right) was not increased in HeLa-RIPK3 cells compared to Hela-LZRS. Adenovirus structural protein nomenclature: II (hexon), III (penton base), IIIA, IV (fiber) and V (core). h RIPK3 knockdown in TOV21G cells (left) following transfection with 30 pmol siRNA. Adenovirus and TSZ cytotoxicity experiments (right). Cells were treated with TSZ or with dl922-947 24 h following siRNA (30 pmol) transfection. Cell survival was assessed 6 h (TSZ) and 120 h (dl922-947) thereafter. *p < 0.05. ***p < 0.001

RIPK3 expression improves in vivo efficacy

We then evaluated the effect of RIPK3 expression in vivo. We first confirmed that RIPK3 expression did not alter growth of subcutaneous xenografts from two HeLa RIPK3 clones, D2 and E4 (Fig. 5a), and that RIPK3 expression was maintained in vivo (Fig. 5b). Expression of E1A and adenovirus structural proteins was assessed using quantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) in control (HeLa LZRS) and RIPK3-expressing tumours following a single intratumoural injection of dl922-947. As with the in vitro data, there was no difference in viral protein expression (Fig. 5c), but we did detect a significant increase in total necrotic area in RIPK3-expressing tumours following dl922-947 injection compared to HeLa LZRS (Fig. 5d). In a therapeutic experiment using the HeLa-RIPK3 D2 clone, RIPK3 expression significantly enhanced the activity of intratumoural dl922-947 (Fig. 5e, Fig. S11), with complete elimination of 3/6 HeLa-RIPK3 D2 tumours compared to 0/6 HeLa-LZRS tumours.

Fig. 5. RIPK3 expression augments dl922-947-induced cytotoxicity in vivo.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

a Expression of RIPK3 does not alter subcutaneous growth of HeLa tumours in female nude mice (N = 14 for LZRS, 28 for RIPK3). Data represent mean ± SEM. b HeLa-RIPK3 tumours retain expression of RIPK3 by qRT-PCR (left) and immunoblot (right). c HeLa-RIPK3 (clones D2 and E4) and HeLa-LZRS tumours were injected with a single intratumoural dose of dl922-947 (5 × 109 particles) and harvested 48 h later. Expression of E1A and Ad5 proteins was assessed by quantitative IHC. d Necrotic area was quantified using Slidepath Tissue Image Analysis. *p < 0.05. e HeLa-RIPK3 (clone D2) and HeLa-LZRS tumours were grown subcutaneously in CD1 female nude mice (n = 12 per genotype). Once tumours reached approximately 200 mm3 (median 195 mm3 for LZRS, 185 mm3 for RIPK3), mice were randomly allocated to receive two doses of intratumoural dl922-947 (5 × 109 particles) or PBS, 14 days apart. Tumours were measured twice weekly by callipers. Error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.05

Caspase-8 inhibition augments viral cytotoxicity that is reversed by RIPK3 inhibition and MLKL knockout

Finally, we sought to explain how RIPK3 influences adenovirus activity. Previously, we showed that zVAD.fmk, the pan-caspase inhibitor, does not reverse dl922-947 efficacy in multiple ovarian cancer cells5, including OVCAR4, which we re-confirmed here (Fig. S12). However, we observed here that addition of 25 µM zVAD.fmk consistently and significantly increased the activity of dl922-947 (Fig. 6a) and Ad5 (Fig. S13) in TOV21G. Moreover, this effect was recapitulated following treatment of TOV21G with the caspase-8-directed inhibitor zIETD.fmk (25 µM) (Fig. 6b). There was clear evidence of MLKL phosphorylation 72 h following dl922-947 infection in the presence of zVAD.fmk (Fig. 6c) but not at 24 or 48 h (Fig. S14), and the effect of zVAD.fmk was partially rescued by the RIPK3 inhibitor GSK2791840B (Fig. 6d). To explore further, we performed RIPK3 co-immunoprecipitation and demonstrated an interaction between RIPK3 and MLKL following dl922-947 infection (Fig. 6e, Fig. S15) as well as an interaction between RIPK3 and adenovirus proteins (Fig. 6f). We then used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to knock out MLKL in TOV21G cells. We were unable to isolate any clones with bi-allelic mutations in MLKL but did identify three heterozygote clones (Supplementary data) with reduced MLKL expression by immunoblot and reduced sensitivity to TSZ-induced necrosis compared to both parental TOV21G cells and clones with no MLKL mutations (Fig. 6g). The partial loss of MLKL did not increase sensitivity to dl922-947 significantly (Fig. 6h), in keeping with siRNA experiments (Fig. 3d), but completely reversed the zVAD.fmk-mediated increase in dl922-947 efficacy (Fig. 6i).

Fig. 6. Caspase-8 inhibition augments viral cytotoxicity that is reversed by RIPK3 inhibition and MLKL knockout.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

a TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 (MOI 0.001–100 pfu/cell). zVAD.fmk (25 µM) or DMSO was added 2 h postinfection. Cell survival was assessed 120 h postinfection. b TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 (MOI 0.01–1 pfu/cell). zVAD.fmk (25 µM), zIETD.fmk (25 µM) or DMSO was added 2 h postinfection. Cell survival was assessed 120 h postinfection. c MLKL phosphorylation was assessed in TOV21G following treatment with dl922-947 (MOI 1, 72 h) and/or zVAD.fmk (25 µM, 72 h) by immunoblot. d TOV21G cells were infected with dl922-947 (MOI 0.001–1). zVAD.fmk (25 µM) with or without GSK2791840B (10 µM) was added 2 h later. Cell survival was assessed 120 h postinfection by MTT assay. e, f HeLa-RIPK3 D2 cells were infected with dl922-947 (MOI 1) for up to 48 h or treated with TSZ for up to 2 h. RIPK3 was immunoprecipitated as described in Materials and Methods. RIPK3 and MLKL e and adenovirus proteins f were assessed in lysate and precipitate by immunoblot. Arrow in e represents MLKL band at 54 Kda. Asterisks indicates non-specific band. g Single-cell TOV21G clones were isolated following CRISPR/Cas9-mediated MLKL exon 5 editing. MLKL expression was assessed by immunoblot (left). Clones marked asterisk (F9, E8, D6) had reduced MLKL expression and demonstrated mono-allelic deletions in exon 5 by sequencing. MLKL+/− clones had reduced sensitivity to TSZ-induced necrosis (right). h No difference in dl922-947 sensitivity in MLKL+/− clones compared to MLKL+/+. Each dot represents IC50 for one clone from a triplicate dose–response experiment. i Loss of MLKL reverses zVAD.fmk-induced enhancement of dl922-947 cytotoxicity. Each point represents a single triplicate experiment at each MOI. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. Concentration of zVAD.fmk was 25 µM

Discussion

Evasion of cell death is a hallmark of cancer24, and all anticancer therapies must circumvent these death-resistance mechanisms to be effective. Oncolytic viruses are a novel form of therapy that can both induce direct cytotoxicity in infected cells and establish adaptive antitumour immune responses25. However, the mode of death induced by adenovirus remains unclear.

We previously showed that E1A CR2-deleted serotype 5 adenoviruses induce a form of programmed death that was not apoptotic but had features to suggest a type of necrosis5. However, there have been few attempts to interrogate adenovirus-induced cell death since the recent elucidation of programmed necrosis pathways. Our results here indicate that the group C adenoviruses dl922-947 and Ad5 wild type induce a mode of cell death that morphologically appears necrotic with associated membrane rupture. We show that these viruses do not require the necrotic kinase RIPK1 and that blockade of TNF-α does not inhibit viral activity. Although NSA treatment partially inhibited cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner in TOV21G and OVCAR4 cells, suggesting that MLKL might play a role, siRNA experiments were negative (Fig. 3d), NSA treatment had no effect in the HeLa-RIPK3 clones and there was no MLKL phosphorylation at 24 and 48 h hours postinfection (Fig. S14), implying that the NSA effect represented off-target activity. By contrast, RIPK3 does play a role, with reduction in cytotoxicity upon siRNA-mediated knockdown in TOV21G cells and increased cell death both in vitro and in vivo upon RIPK3 overexpression in HeLa. Moreover, we also show that inhibition of caspases, specifically caspase-8, significantly augments activity in necrosis-competent TOV21G cells, in a manner that is RIPK3 and MLKL dependent.

The first conclusion of these results is that group C adenovirus-induced death differs from the classical pathway of necroptosis induced by TSZ (TNF-α, Smac mimetic and zVAD.fmk) and does not absolutely require the presence of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL; HeLa cells do not express RIPK3, while OVCAR4 express low levels of both RIPK3 and MLKL, and both are resistant to TSZ treatment. Yet both still undergo cytotoxicity following adenovirus infection (Fig. 1a–c). Nonetheless, TOV21G cells, which are intrinsically TSZ sensitive, are the most susceptible to adenovirus, as we have shown previously3,22, and siRNA-mediated RIPK3 knockdown partially enhanced cytotoxicity in these cells. Furthermore, HeLa-RIPK3 cells, which are rendered TSZ-sensitive through RIPK3 expression, had increased adenovirus sensitivity, with a direct correlation between extent of RIPK3 expression and sensitivity. Together, these results suggest a link between virus activity and programmed necrosis.

The second conclusion is that adenovirus-induced death parallels that induced by other DNA viruses, including murine cytomegalovirus (mCMV). In mCMV infection, RIPK1 is also redundant, and caspase-8 acts to suppress RIPK3-mediated death18. In addition, the mCMV M45 gene encodes viral inhibitor of RIP activation, which contains a RHIM domain and blocks RIPK3-dependent death18. Here co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that a RIPK3- and MLKL-containing complex forms following dl922-947 infection and that MLKL phosphorylation (and hence activation) is evident upon caspase inhibition. Thus, in TOV21G cells, caspase-8 acts to suppress virus-induced necrosis. Our data are also intriguing in that, in the absence of caspase inhibition, knockdown of RIPK3, but not MLKL, partially reduces cytotoxicity (Fig. 4f), suggesting that there may be other death effector proteins that are activated by RIPK3 in the presence of adenovirus infection. We hypothesise that there are critical interactions between adenovirus proteins and RIPK3 that inhibit RIPK3 function and thus prevent MLKL phosphorylation in the absence of caspase-8 inhibition. However, unlike mCMV and HSV-1, there are no published reports of RHIM domain-containing adenovirus proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation here did suggest direct interaction between RIPK3 and adenovirus capsid proteins, but further analysis will be required to establish the specificity and significance of these interactions, as well as to identify other adenovirus proteins that might bind to RIPK3.

It is known that adenovirus encodes proteins that can specifically inhibit mitochondrial apoptosis, especially E1B 19K, a Bcl2 homologue that blocks Bax homo/heterodimerisation26,27. Other adenovirus proteins involved in cell death include E3 11.6K (adenovirus death protein, ADP) and E4orf4. ADP is expressed late following infection and promotes lysis of infected cells28,29 and may be a critical regulator of lytic versus latent infection in lymphocytes30. However, there are no publications to suggest that ADP-mediated lysis might represent a necrotic process nor that ADP interacts with RIPK3 or MLKL. E4orf4, when expressed alone, can induce p53-independent, caspase-independent cell death31,32, but again, there is no evidence to support an interaction with any necrotic proteins, nor indeed to support a role for E4orf4 in cell death during productive adenovirus infection33.

Dyer et al. have recently investigated the group B adenovirus enadenotucirev (EnAd) in A549 cells34 and suggested that, rather than a necrotic process, cytotoxicity resembled ischaemic oncosis, a form of death marked by ATP loss, a rise in intracellular calcium and loss of membrane integrity with release of inflammatory mediators35. Some of the changes seen following EnAd infection were replicated following Ad11p and Ad5 infection, although they were less marked. Our data do not necessarily contradict these results, as loss of ATP and membrane integrity are also observed in necrosis36, including that induced by vaccinia, as we have previously noted16.

Other viruses also interact with RIPK3, including influenza A virus (IAV). IAV infection activates RIPK3, which then triggers parallel pathways of cell death, including MLKL-dependent necrosis and FADD-dependent apoptosis19. The key sensor for RIPK3 activation is DAI, which recognises IAV RNA37. Thus other host proteins beyond the core necrotic machinery may be responsible for directing cell death. It is noticeable that the enhancement of dl922-947-induced cytotoxicity seen in the presence of zVAD.fmk and zIETD.fmk in TOV21G cells was not recapitulated in HeLa-RIPK3 cells (data not shown) despite expression of caspase-8 in these cells, suggesting the presence of specific pathways within TOV21G cells responsible for these observations. Other potential cellular pathways to trigger RIPK3 activation include TLR signalling. Inhibition of caspase-8 in the presence of activated TLR signalling, including TLR3 and TLR4, results in RIPK3-dependent necrosis that requires TRIF or MyD88 signalling12. It is certainly known that adenovirus can activate multiple TLR signalling pathways, including TLR438. Recent data also suggest that human adenovirus uptake can induce very rapid necrosis of liver macrophages that is independent of RIPK3 activity, but relies upon the transcription factor IRF3 (interferon-regulatory factor 3), and is triggered by viral entry into the cytosol39. However, the kinetics of liver macrophage death, which was observed within 5–10 min of intravenous injection of human adenovirus into wild-type C57Bl/6 mice, are dramatically different from that seen following infection of human epithelial cells and occuring prior to any viral gene expression. One difficulty of investigating adenovirus-induced death in vivo is the species specificity of human adenovirus. We have previously identified failure of translation of late human adenovirus mRNA in murine cells as a key factor in that specificity40, which precludes the use of transgenic murine models as tools to investigate the role of specific host genes either in whole animals of murine embryonic fibroblasts. However, a valuable lesson from the investigation of HSV-1 is that host species is critical—the ICP6/RIPK3 interaction has polar opposite effects in murine and human cells20,21—implying strong evolutionary pressure in natural hosts to protect against from virus infection41.

In summary (Fig. 7), we show here that group C adenovirus-induced death has some hallmarks of necrosis that differs from the classical TSZ-induced death and is specifically independent of TNF-α and RIPK1. In the presence of caspase-8 inhibition, death can proceed in a RIPK3- and MLKL-dependent pathway. Future work will be required to identify whether specific adenovirus proteins regulate this effect and the key host signalling pathways involved.

Fig. 7. Schematic representation of adenovirus-induced cell death.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

a In cells lacking RIPK3 (or expressing low levels of RIPK3), adenovirus infection induces cell death that resembles necrosis but is TNF-α, RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL independent and is not apoptotic. b In the presence of RIPK3, either endogenous or via overexpression, cells undergo RIPK1- and MLKL-independent cell death that is partially RIPK3 dependent. c In TOV21G cells, adenovirus infection leads to formation of a complex containing RIPK3, MLKL and viral protein(s). In the presence of either zVAD.fmk or zIETD.fmk, inhibition of caspase-8 leads to MLKL phosphorylation and necrotic cell death that is both RIPK3 and MLKL dependent

Materials and methods

Cell lines, viruses and viability assays

HeLa and 293T cells were obtained from Cancer Research UK Cell Services (Clare Hall, UK), OVCAR4 from National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MA, USA) and TOV21G from Professor Fran Balkwill (Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK). The Phoenix-AMPHO cells were kindly provided by Stephen Tait’s laboratory. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-Glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. All cell lines were verified by STR profiling (Promega GenePrint 10) at the CRUK Beatson Institute. Cells were tested for mycoplasma every second week. Cell survival was assessed by MTT assay42 and by flow cytometry following staining with Zombie Violet membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye (Biolegend, London, UK).

The Ad5 vector, dl922-947, has been described previously. It contains a 24-bp deletion in E1A CR2 as well as a 745-bp deletion in E3B. The Adenovirus Death Protein (E3 11.6K) is retained43. Adenoviruses type 5, 11 and 35 were obtained from Dr H Wang, Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK. Virus replication was assessed by TCID50 assay as previously1.

HeLa RIPK3 and control (LZRS) cells were generated by retrovirus transduction of HeLa following transient transfection of the plasmids pLZRS-RIPK3/pLZRS-control44,45 into Phoenix-AMPHO cells. Following selection in zeocin, single-cell clones were isolated by dilution cloning.

Necrosis induction and inhibition

Cells treated with TSZ (TNF-α (20 ng/ml), Smac-mimetic (1 μM LCL-161) zVAD.fmk (25 µM)) for up to 72 h. Necrostatin-1 and NSA were obtained from Enzo Life Sciences, Switzerland and Calbiochem, USA, respectively. Specific RIPK1 (GSK3002962A, GSK3002963A) and RIPK3 (GSK2791840B) inhibitors were kind gifts from Dr Peter Gough, GlaxoSmithKline (Collegeville, PA, USA).

Immunoblotting and co-immunoprecipitation

Twenty micrograms of total protein was electrophoresed at 140 V for 1 h, transferred onto nitrocellulose and blocked in 5% non-fat milk. A full list of antibodies is given in Supplementary Material. Membranes were exposed on a Chemi-doc MP (Biorad) with ECL (GE Healthcare, UK). RIPK3 expression was quantified using ImageJ (NIH, v1.46r).

For co-immunoprecipitation, cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40) with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (Sigma-Aldrich, UK). One milligram of total protein was incubated overnight at 4° C with anti RIPK3 Ab (Santa-Cruz Sc374639, 1:50). Samples were incubated for 2 h with 15 μl Dynabead Pan Mouse IgG magnetic beads (Invitrogen, UK) and washed three times in ice-cold Nonidet P-40 buffer. To pull down the desired complex, 16 μl of water and 4 μl of 5x Laemmli buffer were added to the beads, vortexed and denatured at 95° C for 5 min. Beads were removed and the samples were electrophoresed as above.

Electron microscopy

Cells grown on Thermanox coverslips were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before fixing in 1.5% Glutaraldehyde/0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate buffer for 1 h at 4° C and then washed three times for 5 min each in 0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate buffer rinse (2% sucrose). Samples were postfixed in 1% Osmium Tetroxide/0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate buffer for 1 h and then washed for 3 × 10 min in distilled water followed by en block staining in 0.5% aqueous Uranyl Acetate for 1 h in the dark and washed again twice for 1 min with dH2O. Samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90%) for 10 min followed by 100% ethanol 4 × 5min, followed with Propylene Oxide 3 × 5min and then 1:1 Propylene Oxide: Araldite/Epon resin (TAAB 812) overnight. Samples were then put into fresh pure Epon/Araldite resin, embedded in flat bed moulds and polymerized for 48 h at 60° C. Ultrathin sections (60–70 nm) were produced using a LEICA Ultracut UCT (Leica Microsystems, UK) and Diatome diamond knife (Diatome, USA) at an angle of 6 degrees. Sample sections were picked up on 100 mesh formvar-coated copper grids and then contrast stained with 2% Methanolic Uranyl Acetate for 5 min followed by Reynolds Lead Citrate for 5 min. Samples were viewed on a FEI Tecnai T20 (Zeiss, UK) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV, and images were captured using the GATAM Digital Imaging system.

Confocal microscopy

Cells were seeded on coverslips, infected with dl922-947 (MOI 1, 48 h), permeabilised with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 1 min and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Cells were stained with anti-MLKL antibody (Millipore, Watford, UK) and co-stained with anti-phalloidin (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. Cells were co-stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Coverslips were mounted on slides and images were captured using a Zeiss 710 confocal microscope.

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing

Two open-access software programs, CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.rc.fas.harvard.edu/) and CRISPR design (http://crispr.mit.edu/), were used to design guide RNAs (gRNA) targeted to MLKL exon 5. Three guides were designed, although only one guide, which targeted the RIPK3 phosphothreonine target site of MLKL (nt 25408-25437 inclusive), yielded knockout clones. Annealed oligonucleotides were ligated into BbsI-linearised pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459 v2—Addgene no. 6298846, a gift from Feng Zhang via Addgene). All plasmids were sequenced to confirm successful ligation.

TOV21G cells (4 × 105) were plated overnight in antibiotic-free medium and transfected with 4 µg PX459 using Lipofectamine 2000, selected under puromycin (2.5 µg/ml) for 48 h and plated onto 96-well plates (10 cells/ml). Single-cell colonies were expanded for DNA extraction, protein extraction and cryopreservation.

PCR primers spanning potential sites of deletion were designed (Forward 5ʹ-ACAATCCCTGCCCTTTACTCC-3ʹ, Reverse 5ʹ-GAGTTTAGGTGGTCCTTGGAGG-3ʹ). Clones with large PCR insertion/deletions were selected for subsequent analysis. Remaining clones were screened using the Surveyor Nuclease Assay (Integrated DNA Technology). Mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All sequence alignment was performed using MAFFT version 7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/).

In vivo experiments

All animal experiments were performed in the Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute Biological Services Unit (registered facility 60/2607) under appropriate UK Home Office personal and project licence (70/8645) authority. All experiments adhered to NCRI Guidelines on the use of animals in medical research47. Animals were allocated treatment randomly by cage. All injections and tumour measurements, as well as all decisions about animal welfare, were taken by BSU staff and D.A. to prevent bias.

Female CD1 nu/nu mice were injected subcutaneously with 5 × 106 cells in 100 μl of PBS in groups of 6. Tumours were measured three times a week, and volume was calculated using the equation (L × W2)/2, where L = longest diameter and W = perpendicular width. Once tumours reached approximately 200 mm3, each group received intratumoural doses of dl922-947 (5 × 109 particles in 30 µl) or PBS (30 µl). For tumour IHC and immunoblot experiments (Fig. 5b – d), both HeLa RIPK3 D2 and HeLa RIPK3 E4 tumours were used. Tumours were harvested 48 h after single injection of dl922-947 (5 × 109 particles) or PBS and cut into two equal parts. One was snap frozen and the other fixed overnight in 10% paraformaldehyde before processing. Slides were stained for the expression of E1A (rabbit anti Ad2/5 E1A, sc-430, 1:50, Santa-Cruz, CA) or adenovirus structural proteins (goat anti-adenovirus, ab36851, 1:400, Abcam, UK). Stained slides were digitised (Hamamatsu NanoZoomer NDP, Hamamatsu Photonics, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and viewed using Slidepath Digital Image Hub V4.0.7 (Leica Microsystems, Milton Keynes, UK). Areas of tumour were identified and scored using Slidepath Tissue Image Analysis and histoscores were generated by multiplying intensity of cellular staining within marked areas (range 0–3) by the percentage of cells with positive staining (range 0–100), with a maximum histoscore of 300. Tumour necrotic area was calculated as the percentage of acellular/anuclear area per tumour divided by total tumour area using Slidepath Tissue Image Analysis.

In the therapeutic experiment (Fig. 5e), HeLa RIPK3 D2 cells were utilised and two doses of virus were administered, 14 days apart (days 23 and 37 for LZRS tumours; days 27 and 41 for RIPK3). Mice were killed when tumours reached clinical end point (maximum length 15 mm or tumour ulceration).

Statistics

All data points show mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. All statistical calculations were performed using Prism (v6, GraphPad, CA). All comparisons utilise unpaired t-test unless otherwise stated. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figures legends (129.5KB, docx)
Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 (2.4MB, jpg)
Supplementary Figures 3 - 10 (776.5KB, jpg)
Supplementary Figures 11 - 15 (594.2KB, jpg)
Supplementary sequence alignment (4.2KB, rtf)

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the University of Glasgow, the Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Programme, Cancer Research UK (grants C16420/A12995, C608/A15973), Marsha Rivkin Cancer Research Center and the Beatson Cancer Charity (grant 15-16-051). All animal work was performed in the Biological Services Unit facilities at the Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute (Cancer Research UK grant C596/A17196).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

M Weigert and A Binks contributed equally to this work.

Edited by C. Munoz-Pinedo

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (10.1038/s41419-017-0110-8) contains supplementary material.

References

  • 1.Lockley M, et al. Activity of the adenoviral E1A deletion mutant dl922-947 in ovarian cancer: comparison with adenovirus wild-type, bioluminescence monitoring and intraperitoneal delivery in icodextrin. Cancer Res. 2006;66:989–998. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leyton J, et al. Quantifying the activity of adenoviral E1A CR2 deletion mutants using renilla luciferase bioluminescence and 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography imaging. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9178–9185. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Connell CM, et al. Genomic DNA damage and ATR-Chk1 signaling determine oncolytic adenoviral efficacy in human ovarian cancer cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1283–1297. doi: 10.1172/JCI43976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tookman LA, et al. RAD51 and BRCA2 promote oncolytic adenovirus type 5 activity in ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2016;14:44–55. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0188-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baird SK, et al. Oncolytic adenoviral mutants induce a novel mode of programmed cell death in ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:3081–3090. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Vanden Berghe T, Kroemer G. Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:700–714. doi: 10.1038/nrm2970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sun L, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. 2012;148:213–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cai Z, et al. Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16:55–65. doi: 10.1038/ncb2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tenev T, et al. The ripoptosome, a signaling platform that assembles in response to genotoxic stress and loss of IAPs. Mol. Cell. 2011;43:432–448. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feoktistova M, et al. cIAPs block ripoptosome formation, a RIP1/caspase-8 containing intracellular cell death complex differentially regulated by cFLIP isoforms. Mol. Cell. 2011;43:449–463. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blander JM. A long-awaited merger of the pathways mediating host defence and programmed cell death. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:601–618. doi: 10.1038/nri3720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kaiser WJ, et al. Toll-like receptor 3-mediated necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:31268–31279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.462341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lawlor KE, et al. RIPK3 promotes cell death and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the absence of MLKL. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6282. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.He S, Liang Y, Shao F, Wang X. Toll-like receptors activate programmed necrosis in macrophages through a receptor-interacting kinase-3-mediated pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:20054–20059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116302108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang T, et al. CaMKII is a RIP3 substrate mediating ischemia- and oxidative stress-induced myocardial necroptosis. Nat. Med. 2016;22:175–182. doi: 10.1038/nm.4017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Whilding LM, et al. Vaccinia virus induces programmed necrosis in ovarian cancer cells. Mol. Ther. 2013;21:2074–2086. doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cho YS, et al. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell. 2009;137:1112–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Upton JW, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES. Virus inhibition of RIP3-dependent necrosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7:302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nogusa, S. et al. RIPK3 activates parallel pathways of MLKL-driven necroptosis and FADD-mediated apoptosis to protect against influenza A virus. Cell Host Microbe20, 13–24 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Huang Z, et al. RIP1/RIP3 Binding to HSV-1 ICP6 initiates necroptosis to restrict virus propagation in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guo H, et al. Herpes simplex virus suppresses necroptosis in human cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Flak MB, et al. p21 promotes oncolytic adenoviral activity in ovarian cancer and is a potential biomarker. Mol. Cancer. 2010;9:175. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dondelinger Y, et al. MLKL compromises plasma membrane integrity by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates. Cell Rep. 2014;7:971–981. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.De Munck, J., Binks, A., McNeish, I. A. & Aerts, J. L. Oncolytic virus-induced cell death and immunity: a match made in heaven? J. Leukoc. Biol.102, 631–643 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Perez D, White E. TNF-alpha signals apoptosis through a bid-dependent conformational change in Bax that is inhibited by E1B 19K. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:53–63. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Han J, et al. The E1B 19K protein blocks apoptosis by interacting with and inhibiting the p53-inducible and death-promoting Bax protein. Genes Dev. 1996;10:461–477. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tollefson AE, Ryerse JS, Scaria A, Hermiston TW, Wold WS. The E3-11.6-kDa adenovirus death protein (ADP) is required for efficient cell death: characterization of cells infected with adp mutants. Virology. 1996;220:152–162. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tollefson AE, et al. The adenovirus death protein (E3-11.6K) is required at very late stages of infection for efficient cell lysis and release of adenovirus from infected cells. J. Virol. 1996;70:2296–2306. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.4.2296-2306.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Murali VK, et al. Adenovirus death protein (ADP) is required for lytic infection of human lymphocytes. J. Virol. 2014;88:903–912. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01675-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lavoie JN, Nguyen M, Marcellus RC, Branton PE, Shore GC. E4orf4, a novel adenovirus death factor that induces p53-independent apoptosis by a pathway that is not inhibited by zVAD-fmk. J. Cell Biol. 1998;140:637–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cabon L, et al. Adenovirus E4orf4 protein-induced death of p53-/- H1299 human cancer cells follows a G1 arrest of both tetraploid and diploid cells due to a failure to initiate DNA synthesis. J. Virol. 2013;87:13168–13178. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01242-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kleinberger T. Mechanisms of cancer cell killing by the adenovirus E4orf4 protein. Viruses. 2015;7:2334–2357. doi: 10.3390/v7052334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dyer A, et al. Oncolytic group b adenovirus enadenotucirev mediates non-apoptotic cell death with membrane disruption and release of inflammatory mediators. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics. 2017;4:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weerasinghe P, Buja LM. Oncosis: an important non-apoptotic mode of cell death. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2012;93:302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Voigt S, et al. TRAIL-induced programmed necrosis as a novel approach to eliminate tumor cells. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thapa RJ, et al. DAI Senses influenza a virus genomic RNA and activates RIPK3-dependent cell death. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:674–681. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cianciola NL, Chung S, Manor D, Carlin CR. Adenovirus modulates toll-like receptor 4 signaling by reprogramming ORP1L-VAP protein contacts for cholesterol transport from endosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Virol. 2015;91:e01904–16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01904-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Di Paolo NC, Doronin K, Baldwin LK, Papayannopoulou T, Shayakhmetov DM. The transcription factor IRF3 triggers “defensive suicide” necrosis in response to viral and bacterial pathogens. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1840–1846. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Young AM, et al. Failure of translation of human adenovirus mRNA in murine cancer cells can be partially overcome by L4-100K expression in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2012;26:1676–1688. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mossman KL, Weller SK. HSV cheats the executioner. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:148–151. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heise C, et al. An adenovirus E1A mutant that demonstrates potent and selective systemic anti-tumoral efficacy. Nat. Med. 2000;6:1134–1139. doi: 10.1038/80474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tait SW, et al. Widespread mitochondrial depletion via mitophagy does not compromise necroptosis. Cell Rep. 2013;5:878–885. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodriguez DA, et al. Characterization of RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation of the activation loop of MLKL during necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:76–88. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ran FA, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:2281–2308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Workman P, et al. Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research. Br. J. Cancer. 2010;102:1555–1577. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures legends (129.5KB, docx)
Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 (2.4MB, jpg)
Supplementary Figures 3 - 10 (776.5KB, jpg)
Supplementary Figures 11 - 15 (594.2KB, jpg)
Supplementary sequence alignment (4.2KB, rtf)

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES