Abstract
For over two decades we have systematically explored structure-composition-property relationships of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)-based polymeric dental composites. The appeal of these bioactive materials stems from their intrinsic ability to prevent demineralization and/or restore defective tooth structures via sustained release of remineralizing calcium and phosphate ions. Due to the compositional similarity of the ACP to biological tooth mineral, ACP-based composites should exhibit excellent biocompatibility. Research described in this article has already yielded remineralizing sealants and orthodontic adhesives as well as a prototype root canal sealer. Our work has also contributed to a better understanding on how polymer matrix structure and filler/matrix interactions affect the critical properties of these polymeric composites and their overall performance. The addition of antimicrobial compounds to the formulation of ACP composites could increase their medical and dental regenerative treatment applications, thereby benefiting an even greater number of patients.
Keywords: amorphous calcium phosphate, bioactivity, dental composite, polymerization, remineralization
INTRODUCTION
Calcium phosphates in dental and biomedical applications
Calcium phosphates (CaPs) are of special significance to oral biology, dentistry and medicine due to their occurrence in both normal (enamel, dentin and bone) and pathological (atheroschlerotic deposits, urinary calculi, and dental calculi) mineralization. CaPs are, generally, non-toxic, biocompatible, non-antigenic, and they integrate into living tissue by the same processes that are active during bone formation [1–5]. Within the CaP family of compounds, there are a number of crystalline forms with very distinctive structural, compositional and solubility features. Hydroxyapatite (HAP; idealized as Ca10(OH)2(PO4)6) is considered to be the final, stable product in the precipitation of CaPs from neutral and/or basic solutions. HAP is also the main mineral component of bones and teeth. Biological HAPs typically are not pure-stoichiometric but rather carbonate-substituted and calcium-deficient. Over the broad range of solution conditions in which CaPs form spontaneously, amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP; approximate compositional formula Ca3(PO4)2.3H2O [6]) precedes the appearance of HAP. ACP lacks the long-range, periodic atomic scale order of crystalline materials. Although the structural uniqueness of ACP has been a subject of considerable interest, of greater relevance to understanding the dynamics of HAP formation is the instability of ACP in aqueous environments. Significantly, the solution life of ACP can be extended by the inclusion of simple cations (Mg2+, Sr2+, Zn2+, Zr4+ etc.), certain anions (fluoride, silicate, carbonate, pyrophosphate etc.), various polyelectrolytes, and bio-macromolecules such as casein phospho-peptide (CPP) [2, 3]. In aqueous environments, and particularly under acidic challenges, a spontaneous, autocatalytic ACP to HAP conversion occurs accompanied by the simultaneous release of Ca and PO4 ions. This release of mineral constituent ions is seen as a major advantage of ACP-based biomaterials compared to the crystalline CaP-based counterparts.
Our group at the Volpe (formerly known as Paffenbarger) Research Center has been at the forefront of the research on bioactive, remineralizing polymeric ACP dental materials for over two decades. Our work was initially driven by the considerable experience of our team in ACP synthesis and its thermodynamic and solution kinetic behavior. It was further inspired by the ACP’s proven biocompatibility, osteoinductivity, affinity for proteins and cells [2, 3], and its resorption rate coinciding closely with the rate of new bone formation [2]. ACP showed better osteoconductivity in vivo than HAP [7] and has been recognized as a precursor to HAP formation both in vitro and in vivo [4, 8–12]. It has also been identified in early formed enamel [13]. We have demonstrated that polymeric ACP composites, when exposed to simulated oral conditions, indeed provide an extended reservoir of Ca and PO4 ions needed for the repair of damaged tooth mineral, and can efficiently regenerate mineral-depleted tooth structures via re-deposition of HAP [14]. Besides its practical applicative side, our work has also contributed to a better understanding of ACP/polymer and ACP composite/tooth interfacial phenomena, and the bio-responses to these types of materials. In this article, we describe the experimental designs used to formulate ACP composites for various dental applications and also explain how have our studies helped us and, possibly a much wider scientific research community, to better understand how different monomer systems yield unique matrix structures and filler/matrix interactions that can affect many critical properties of ACP composites and their overall performance. We also discuss our future directions aimed at adding an antimicrobial function in the formulation of ACP composites, adhesives, sealants, etc., thus possibly further expanding the potential application of ACP composites not only in dentistry but perhaps in regenerative hard tissue medicine as well.
ACP as an anti-demineralizing/remineralizing tool in dental applications
Tooth demineralization (dissolution of tooth mineral into saliva) and remineralization (re-deposition of Ca and PO4 ions back into tooth structures) are dynamic processes that strongly depend on the pH of the oral environment. If these processes are well balanced there is no mineral loss. However, when the balance between demineralization and remineralization is disrupted (local decrease in pH caused by bacterial plaque or the frequent intake of acidic foods and beverages) demineralization prevails. If uncontrolled, over time this demineralization leads to tooth erosion and, in advanced cases, decay. Therefore, inhibition of the uncontrolled demineralization is the primary target in all anti-caries therapies. It is generally achieved by fluoridation of drinking water and/or administration of fluoride (F) through tooth pastes, mouthwashes and/or high F-content gels. However, due to concerns regarding fluorosis associated with the (over)exposure to F [15], there is a need to develop new approaches for caries prevention/repair that would provide anti-demineralization/remineralization function without increasing F doses and/or its administration frequency. For any treatment to be clinically successful it is essential that a protracted supply of ions (Ca, PO4 and/or F) needed to reform mineral structures be provided and that replacement of lost mineral occurs faster than in natural salivary mineralization. The use of solutions containing remineralizing Ca2+ and PO4 ions have not been successful clinically [16], particularly in the presence of F ions. On the other hand, these relatively insoluble CaPs are not easily applied and do not localize effectively at the tooth surface. One of the ACP technologies introduced casein phosphopeptide (CPP)-ACP nanoclusters in metastable solutions. These CCP-ACP nanoclusters localize at the tooth surface and prevent caries in laboratory, animal and human in situ caries model studies [16–19]. Our early physicochemical testing [20–23] and the in vitro remineralization study [24] have shown that ACP fillers embedded in biostable methacrylate resins release Ca and PO4 ions in a sustained manner and maintain the desired state of supersaturation with respect to tooth enamel mineral. This feature makes ACP composites a promising anti-demineralization/remineralization tool in not only preventing the formation of new lesions, but also in actively repairing existing incipient lesions. Furthermore, ACP composites have the advantage of concentrating Ca and PO4 release to the site of caries attack. Functional differences between the bioactive (ion-releasing) composites and the conventional biostable dental materials as well as the potential clinical benefits from ACP composites in comparison with conventional counterparts are summarized in table 1. A wide variety of dental products could be made with only small to moderate variations in chemistry and formulation. In this review, design, characterization and evaluation of ACP remineralizing sealants, liners, orthodontic adhesives and endodontic composites are discussed in more details.
Table 1.
Functional differences between the bioactive (ion-releasing) composites and biostable (non-releasing) dental materials (A) and the foreseen clinical benefits of ACP composites (B).
Remineralizing ACP sealants and/or base/lining materials
Much has been written regarding the potential for both caries prevention and repair through remineralization, but to this day few, if any, therapeutic materials have been made available to the practitioners. Identifying an incipient interproximal lesion radiographically or a visual white spot lesion adjacent to an existing restoration is still a “wait and see” situation where all the practitioner can do is to recommend oral hygiene measures and reassess the situation at future visits. A strong need exists for restorative, adhesive and sealant materials that can be placed either permanently or temporarily in areas where carious lesions are beginning or are likely to occur, and that will reliably protect or repair those adjacent tissues. A resin-based restorative that incorporates ACP, a proven remineralizing agent, is seen as an excellent candidate material. As either a light and/or chemically cured composite, it can be placed, using the existing techniques and instrumentation, in patients with high caries risk or when remineralization of an existing incipient lesion is desired. The composite could be placed as a provisional restoration in high caries patients until disease is brought under control or as a preventive base under more permanent materials. It could also be used as a pit and fissure sealant. In all foreseen applications, ACP composite would respond to localized change in pH caused by cariogenic bacteria by releasing high concentrations of Ca2+ and PO4 ions. Besides buffering the bacterial acids, these ions would also be able to remineralize enamel already damaged by the carious conditions. The main advantage of using ACP-based material would be to supply the remineralizing ions in the localized environment of the lesion without changing the mineral saturation of the entire cavity. The therapeutic material would be applied directly to the site where it is needed the most.
Remineralizing ACP orthodontic composites
Enamel demineralization is a common occurrence in orthodontics due to plaque colonization around fixed appliances. Severe cases result in carious lesions and/or unsightly white spots in enamel under and around the periphery of bonded brackets. Orthodontic bonding systems involve at least two interfaces, the enamel/adhesive and the bracket/adhesive interface. If the orthodontist chooses to use an unfilled resin (sealant), then an additional sealant/adhesive interface is introduced. In either case, control of the bond strengths resulting from the various etchant/adhesive/bracket combinations is essential. Some cements bond chemically to enamel, but bond strengths are generally low because cements are brittle and fracture cohesively [25]. Because of their physical properties and low solubility in oral fluids resins and resin-cement hybrid materials and, to a lesser extent, dental cements are used to secure fixed orthodontic devices to tooth surfaces. Resin adhesives typically yield higher bond strengths because resins are more fracture resistant than cements. Resins, however, do not bond well in the presence of moisture, and their attachment to surfaces is primarily mechanical. Hybridized materials combine the advantages of cements and resins but also have certain disadvantages, such as clinical failure rates of up to 12% [26]. Compomers and hybrid composites, behave much like resin adhesives.
Caries inhibition, as measured by fluoride release from compomers, although higher than that from resins, is generally lower than that from glass ionomer cements [25]. Establishing an appropriate milieu for promoting the repair of carious lesions in orthodontic patients remains an important consideration. However, the selection of an optimal orthodontic material and its application requires full understanding of its chemical properties and possible physical and mechanical limitations, and as such, is a great challenge for both researchers and clinicians. Mineral growth necessary for maintaining a desired demineralization/remineralization balance under acid and/or bacterial challenges can be secured by increasing concentrations of Ca and PO4 ions within the lesion. Provided that satisfactory bonding to both tooth surfaces and brackets is attainable, ACP orthodontic composites would have the advantage of releasing tooth mineral constituents in a sustained manner for the entire course of treatment and will efficiently protect or restore damaged mineral in caries-prone orthodontic patients.
Remineralizing ACP endodontic materials
The majority of research in endodontics has been primarily focused on the development of materials and techniques to obturate the root canals of teeth. Recent advances in regenerative endodontics for immature teeth have defined a need for mineralizing regenerative materials such as ACP. The biological basis for the therapy has received comparatively little attention and the advancement of biologically based knowledge significant to clinical endodontics is still slow [27]. The primary objective of root canal therapy is to introduce the appropriate placement of a seal between the root canal system and the periodontium. An ideal root-end filling material should not only seal the root-end cavity hermetically, but should also be biocompatible, nontoxic, insoluble in tissue fluids, non-resorbable, dimensionally stable, capable of inducing osteogenesis and cementogenesis, easy to prepare and use, sterilizable, radio-opaque, inexpensive, and not susceptible to degradation in the presence of moisture. For many years, amalgam was accepted as the material of choice for endodontic surgery. When its toxicity was seriously questioned [28], zinc oxide eugenol cements [29] and hybrid ionomer composites were proposed as alternatives [30]. The advantages and drawbacks of glass ionomers and resin modified ionomers are discussed in [31]. Mineral trioxide aggregate, a mixture of calcium silicate, calcium aluminate, calcium oxide and silicate oxide, hailed by some researchers as an ideal endodontic material [32] also has a number of drawbacks [33–36]. An ACP endodontic sealer and/or filling material with consistent remineralizing capabilities and with minimal or no cellular/tissue toxicity concerns might yield endodontic treatments with improved success rates. Its evaluation for endodontic purposes requires adding cytotoxicity and diffusion tests to the standard physicochemical and mechanical evaluations in order to identify new material(s) suitable for testing in either animal model studies and/or clinical trials.
Antimicrobial ACP composites (preliminary data and future direction)
The vast majority of the commercial dental restoratives do not possess substantial antimicrobial (AM) properties [37] verifiable in clinical trials [38]. In order to make long-lasting, biofilm-resistant restorations, the material should be made antimicrobial. Most of the efforts undertaken to add AM functionality to dental materials have been focused on the release of various low-atomic and molecular mass AMs such as zinc, silver, fluoride and iodine ions, and antibiotics such as chlorhexidine. Generally, there are numerous unresolved issues related to the AM activities of these agents such as still unclear mechanism(s) of their actions, concerns about their toxicity against human cells, general risks related to their release, and questionable long-term efficiencies of their AM action. The AM effects of all low-molecular weight AM agents are typically short-lived. Their uncontrolled release can lead or has led to compromised mechanical properties of the materials. Moreover, if the dose or release kinetics is not properly controlled, toxicity to surrounding tissues becomes a serious drawback.
By becoming part of the polymer matrix phase of dental materials, quaternary ammonium (QA) methacrylate monomers are typically utilized to impart antibacterial activity to polymeric dental composites [37, 38]. QAs are known for their AM action against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, but are also quite toxic [39]. Recently, approach for synthesizing liquid, resin-compatible, ionic dimethacrylates based on QA salts was patented [40] and their utilization in dental applications based on the satisfactory outcome of their in vitro screening was proposed [41]. However, another recent study [42] revealed that incorporation of QAs into dental resin composites above a certain limit can significantly diminish mechanical strength of the materials. In addition, saliva can dramatically decrease AM activity of QA-based restoratives due to the electrostatic interactions of QA functionalities and salivary proteins which raises additional concerns about QA utilization in dental materials. To eliminate some of the drawbacks of the QAs, we intend to incorporate furanone derivatives into ACP matrices. Furanones have been indicated as the potent inhibitors of biofilm formation [43]. Their inhibitory effects appear to be mediated through the interference with the microbial communication (quorum sensing; QS) rather than the microbial growth [44]. The expectation is that furanones immobilized on the surface of the restoratives will lead to a sustained AM activity, which in combination with the remineralizing (RE) action of ACP filler will render these novel AMRE composites, a new bi-directional tool for combating tooth decay.
Specific aims of the research already completed with the purpose of creating remineralizing ACP sealants, orthodontic and/or endodontic composites as well as the research planned for the near future in order to design ACP composites with AMRE capabilities, are summarized in table 2.
Table 2.
Specific targets of our studies.
| ACP materials | Aims | Success measures |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ACP fillers | Hybridization and/or surface modification | Enhanced stability of hybrid and modified ACPs in aqueous milieu |
| De-agglomeration: Effect of small ions, polymers and mechanical milling | More homogeneous particle size distribution of ACPs | |
|
| ||
| Sealants and/or base/liners | Resin phase modifications: structure-composition-property studies | Improved physicochemical and mechanical properties of composites by varying monomer’s structure and/or function and resin composition |
|
| ||
| Orthodontic adhesives | Interfacial coupling and polymer grafting Silanization of the filler and fine tuning of the resin |
Enhanced mechanical strength and adhesiveness with uncompromised remineralization capability |
|
| ||
| Endodontic sealer and/or filler | Formulation of LC-, CC and DC urethane-based ACP composites | High DVC without excessive PS and/or PSS |
| Bio-responses to copolymers and composites | Quantitative assessment of leachability and cytotoxicity | |
|
| ||
| AMRE composites | Formulation of AM resins and AMRE composites | Physicochemical, mechanical and biological performance |
| Quantification of AM activity | Biofilm formation | |
| Remineralization efficacy | Mineral gain/loss upon pH cycling | |
METHODS
The sequential steps involved in ACP composite development are presented in fig. 1. The methods and techniques typically utilized in filler synthesis and validation, as well as the formulation and evaluation of the copolymers and composites are compiled in table 3.
Fig. 1.
Experimental steps involved in design of ACP remineralizing composites.
Table 3.
Instrumental techniques used to validate ACP fillers and resins and/or determine physicochemical, mechanical and biological properties of ACP composites. Indicated acronyms are used throughout the manuscript.
| Method | Property/Parameter | Application/Information |
|---|---|---|
| Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) | Ca and co-cation contents | Chemical analysis of ACP fillers Levels of co-actions in ACP |
| Atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) | Ca and PO4 concentration | Chemical analysis of ACP fillers Ion release from composites |
| Colorimetry | Cell viability | Cellular response to copolymer and/or composite |
| Contact angle goniometry | Wetting properties | Resin’s hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance |
| Dilatometry | Polymerization shrinkage (PS) | Volume changes in composites upon curing |
| Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and micro-spectroscopy (FTIR-m) | Short range structure Surface composition |
Structural validation of ACP fillers Degree of vinyl conversion (DVC) Intra-composite ACP to HAP conversion Surface characterization of copolymers and composites |
| Gravimetry | Mass changes upon aqueous immersion and/or exposure to humidity | Waters sorption (WS) and/or desorption (WD) of copolymers and composites |
| Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) | Bacterial surface coverage and density | AM action of copolymers and composites |
| Mechanical testing | Biaxial flexure strength (BFS), shear bond strength (SBS) | Mechanical performance of copolymers and composites (dry and wet) |
| Microradiography | Mineral content of the teeth | In vitro remineralization efficacy of the composites |
| Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) | Concentrations of leachable moieties | Identification/quantification of leachables from copolymers and composites |
| Particle size analysis | Histograms of number and volume particle size distribution (PSD) | Particle sizes (range and median diameter) of the fillers |
| Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) | Morphology, topology and size | Changes due to exposure of the fillers, copolymers and composites to aqueous media |
| Tensometry | Polymerization shrinkage stress (PSS) | Quantification of PSS in composites |
| Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) | Temperature-dependent mass changes | Thermal decomposition and water content of the fillers and composites |
| Ultraviolet/visible (UV/VIS) spectrophotometry | Phosphate concentration | Chemical analysis of ACP fillers |
| X-ray diffraction (XRD) | Long-range crystalline order | Structural/compositional changes in composites |
ACP synthesis
Generally, ACP is precipitated in closed systems (under CO2-free N2 to minimize CO2 adsorption by the precipitate) at 23 °C upon rapidly mixing equal volumes of a 80 mmol/L Ca(NO3)2 solution and a 54 mmol/L Na2HPO4 solution that also contained a molar fraction of 2% Na4P2O7 (known inhibitor of HAP formation). At these conditions, the ACP forms instantaneously upon mixing the reactants. Various additives (cations, surfactants and/or polymers) can be introduced during the synthesis. The reaction pH is maintained between 8.5 and 10.5. The suspensions are filtered, the solid phase washed subsequently with ice-cold ammoniated water and acetone, freeze-dried and then lyophilized. The ACPs are used as-made (am-ACP) or are subjected to milling (m-ACP; milling significantly reduces the average particle size of ACP fillers [45]). Prior to their utilization in the composite preparation, the fillers, am- and m-ACP alike, are stored under anhydrous conditions in vacuum. This precautionary step is necessary to avoid ACP’s exposure to humidity and its premature conversion to HAP.
Resin formulations
The experimental resins are typically formulated from commercially available monomers. The first step in resin formulation includes mixing of the base monomer with diluent monomer(s). In light- cured (LC) formulations, a surface-active (adhesive) monomer(s) and the components of the visible light initiator system are sequentially added to the original mixture and the final mixture is magnetically stirred under safe lighting until fully homogenized. In chemically-cured (CC) systems, monomers are combined, homogenized and then split into two equal parts by mass. The components of the chemical-cure system are added separately to each part of the monomer mixture, and each is stirred magnetically until blended fully. In dual cure (DC) systems, LC and CC steps are combined.
Fabrication of copolymers and composites
ACP composites are made by mixing the resin (mass fraction 60%) and the filler (mass fraction 40%) by hand spatulation. Monomers and the components of polymerization initiating systems used to formulate the experimental resins are listed in table 4. To eliminate the air entrained during mixing, the homogenized pastes are kept overnight under a moderate vacuum (2.7 kPa). The LC pastes are packed into Teflon molds (mold dimensions vary depending on the type of tests to be performed), each opening of the mold is covered with a thin Mylar film and a glass slide, and the assembly clamped in place by spring clips. The specimens are photo-polymerized by irradiating sequentially each side of the mold assembly for 120 s with visible light (Triad 2000). The CC pastes are combined in 1:1 mass ratio before packing the mixture into the molds in the same manner as for the LC specimens. In DC formulations, CC specimens were additionally photo-irradiated. All specimens are stored for 24 h in air at 23 °C before being tested. LC, CC and DC copolymer (unfilled resin) specimens are made by following the same procedures utilized for fabrication of the composite specimens. When the composite samples were made from commercial materials (commercial controls), manufacturer-recommended curing procedures were followed.
Table 4.
Methacrylate monomers and polymerization-initiating components employed in the studies.
| Component | Chemical nomenclature | Acronym | Mol. mass |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Base monomers | 2,2-bis[p-(2′-hydroxy-3′-methacryloxypropoxy) phenyl]-propane | Bis-GMA | 512 |
| Ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate | EBPADMA | 572 | |
| Urethane dimethacrylate | UDMA | 498 | |
|
| |||
| Diluent monomers | 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate | HEMA | 130 |
| Di(ethyleneglycol)methyl ether methacrylate | DEGMEMA | 188 | |
| Glyceryl monomethacrylate | GMA | 160 | |
| Glyceryl dimethacrylate | GDMA | 228 | |
| Hexamethylene dimethacrylate | HMDMA | 254 | |
| 2-methoxyethyl methacrylate | MEMA | 144 | |
| Triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate | TEGDMA | 286 | |
|
| |||
| Adhesive monomers | Maleic acid | MaA | 101 |
| Methacrylic acid | MA | 86 | |
| Methacryloyloxyethyl phthalate | MEP | 278 | |
| Mono-4-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl trimellitate | 4MET | 322 | |
| Pyromellitic glycerol dimethacrylate | PMDMA | 860 | |
| Vinyl phosphonic acid | VPA | 108 | |
| Zirconyl methacrylate | ZrDMA | 293 | |
|
| |||
| Chemical and/or photo-initiator | Butylated hydroxytoluene (stabilizer) | BHT | 220 |
| Benzoyl peroxide | BPO | 242 | |
| Camphorquinone | CQ | 166 | |
| Ethyl-4-N,N-dimethylaminobenzoate | 4EDMAB | 193 | |
| 2,2-dihydroxyethyl-p-toluidine | DHEPT | 195 | |
| Bis(2,6-dimethoxybenzoyl)-2,4,4-triethylpenthyl phosphine oxide & 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone (mass ratio 1:1) | 1850 Irgacure | 264 | |
| Phenyl-bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide | PbTMBPO | 418 | |
Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) and UV/VIS spectrophotometry
Ca/PO4 ratios of ACP fillers, their Ca, co-cation and PO4 contents are typically determined by AAS (Perkin Elmer Mo.603 spectrophotometer) and/or UV/VIS spectrophotometry (Carey Model 219 spectrophotometer), after dissolving the powders in HCl solution. AAS is also utilized to determine the levels of Si incorporated during silanization of the fillers. PO4 is determined as a blue molybdate complex in an acidified ammonium molybdate solution containing ascorbic acid and a small amount of antimony [46] at a wavelength of 882 nm. The AES (Prodigy High Dispersion inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer) is used as an alternative analytical method for the chemical analysis of ACP fillers and the release of ions from the fillers and/or composites.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
Thermal decomposition profiles of ACP fillers are determined by using a Perkin Elmer 7 Series Thermal Analysis System and heating 5–10 mg of powdered ACP samples at the rate of 20 °C/min (30–600 °C temperature range) in air atmosphere. The overall water content (mass fraction, %), relative ratio of surface-bound/structural water and the level of organics (structurally-incorporated surface-modifiers) are assessed from the TGA data.
Particle size distribution (PSD)
The PSD of the ACP fillers is measured either by using a Shimadzu centrifugal particle size analyzer (model SA-CP3) or a laser light scattering particle size analyzer (CIS-100, Ankersmid). Median particle size diameter (dm) is taken as a primary indicator of ACP particle aggregation (the higher the dm value, the more aggregated the ACP). The PSD data are typically compared with the results of the SEM analysis.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Surface morphology/topology of ACP powders is routinely examined by SEM using a JEOL, JSM-5400 instrument. SEM is also used to evaluate: a) composite disk surfaces before, during (disks cut perpendicular to their fiat surfaces) and after immersion in the test solutions, b) fractured surfaces of composite disk specimens resulting from mechanical testing, and c) tooth/composite interfaces before and after adhesion testing.
X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and micro-spectroscopy (FTIR-m)
The XRD profiles of powdered samples are recorded from 4° to 60° 2Θ with CuKα radiation λ = 0.154 nm using a Rigaku DMAX 2000 X-ray diffractometer operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The samples are step-scanned in intervals of 0.010° 2Θ at a scanning speed of 1.000 deg/min. The same scanning conditions are applied to composite disk specimens that are examined for internal ACP into HAP conversion upon aqueous immersions.
The FTIR spectra [(4000–400) cm−1] of the fillers are recorded using a Nicolet Magna-IR FTIR 550 spectrophotometer purged with dry air and employing the KBr pellet technique [(0.8–1.0) mg solid/400 mg KBr]. The FTIR spectra of the resins are obtained in transmission mode from thin films of the neat resins between the KBr plates.
Mid-FTIR or near-IR spectroscopy is utilized to determine the degree of vinyl conversion (DVC) of the unfilled resins (copolymers) and their ACP composites. Mid-FTIR measurements include monitoring the reduction in the 1637 cm−1 absorption band for the vinyl group against that of an unchanged aromatic peak (1538 cm−1) used as an internal standard. Near-IR method monitors the reduction in the =CH2 absorption band at 6165 cm−1 in the overtone region. By measuring the thickness of monomers/polymer specimens, the need to use an invariant absorption band as an internal standard is circumvented in near-IR measurements. For both methods, spectra are typically acquired before photo-cure, immediately after cure, as well as 24 h and 7 d post-cure.
The FTIR-m is employed to assess the distribution of ACP filler in the resin matrix (intact surfaces as well as cross-sectioned surfaces of copolymer and composite samples) prior (dry specimens) and after exposure to test solutions (wet specimens). A Nic-Plan IR microscope (in reflectance mode) interfaced with a Nicolet Magna-IR TM 550 FTIR spectrophotometer and equipped with a video camera to display images, a liquid nitrogen cooled-mercury cadmium telluride detector (Nicolet Instrumentations Inc.) and a computerized motorized mapping stage, programmable in the x and y directions is used for that purpose. The usefulness of FTIR-m in addressing the problems associated with filler agglomeration and in producing functional PO4 and >C=O group maps is extensively elaborated in [47].
Dissolution/transformation (ion release) kinetics
Both powdered fillers and composite disk specimens are evaluated for their dissolution behavior at 37 °C in aqueous environment (HEPES-buffered (pH = 7.40) 240 mOsm/kg saline solutions). The kinetics of ion release is followed upon dispersion of approx. 800 mg of powdered solids or suspension of the individual composite disks (by means of a stainless steel wire frame) in continuously stirred 100 mL saline. Aliquots for Ca and PO4 analysis (UV/VIS spectrophotometry and/or AES) are taken at the predetermined time intervals. At the same time intervals, a fraction of the solids is separated from the suspending medium, freeze-dried (necessary for early time intervals) and analyzed by XRD and FTIR to assess the extent of ACP to HAP conversion. Composite specimens are additionally screened by SEM and FTIR-m, then ground and the resultant powders analyzed by XRD and FTIR.
Remineralization potential
The remineralization potential of the fillers and composites is calculated from the maximum calcium and phosphate ion activities reached upon aqueous immersion. The thermodynamic stability of these solutions is calculated with respect to the stoichiometric HAP using the Gibbs free-energy expression:
where IAPHAP is the ion activity product for HAP defined as IAPHAP = {Ca}10{PO4}6{OH}2, Ksp is the corresponding thermodynamic solubility product, R is the ideal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, and n is the number of ions in the IAP (n = 18). Negative ΔG° values indicate solution supersaturation with respect to stoichiometric HAP (Ksp=117.2) and are taken as a measure of remineralization ability.
Mechanical properties
Biaxial flexure strength (BFS) and shear bond strength (SBS) of copolymers and experimental composites are determined by using a computer-controlled Universal Testing Machine operated by Testworks 4 software.
A piston-on-three-ball loading arrangement [48], suitable for even slightly warped specimen is used for the BFS measurements (pastes are pressed into a teflon mold [(15.8–16.8) mm in diameter and (1.5–2.1) mm in thickness] by using a plastic spatula). Each opening of the mold is covered with a thin mylar film and a glass slide and the assembly clamped together with a spring clip. The disks are photopolymerized by irradiating each face of the mold assembly for 2 min with visible light. After photo-curing, specimens are released from their molds and kept in either air (dry samples) or in test solutions at 37 °C (wet samples) for the duration of the immersion experiments. The BFS is calculated according to the following equation [49]:
where A = −[3/4π(X−Y)], X = (1+v)ln(r1/rs)2 +[(1−v)/2](r1/rs)2, Y = (1+v)[1 + In(rsc/rs)2], and where v = Poisson’s ratio, r1 = radius of the piston applying the load at the surface of contact, rsc = radius of the support circle, rs = radius of disk specimen, L = applied load at failure, and t = thickness of disk specimen.
The SBS tests are performed on extracted human teeth embedded with cold-cured resin in poly-carbonate cups. Exposed dentin surfaces of the tooth samples will be ground fiat at a 90° angle to the longitudinal axis of the polycarbonate holder. Photo-activated pyromellitic glycerol dimethacrylate (PMGDMA) in acetone solution is used to establish an adhesive layer between the exposed dentin and composite. A brass ring (4 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness) is used as a mold for the composite. Teflon tape (0.3 mm thick) with a hole coinciding with the hole in the ring will be placed under the brass ring to prevent the ring from adhering to the dentin. Both the ring and the tape are placed in the center of the dentin surface and held down with a lead weight (450 g). The cavity in the brass ring is filled with the composite, irradiated for 1 min with a commercial visible-light source, and stored (at 37 °C) immersed in distilled water for various time intervals before de-bonding. To determine the SBS, The assembly is placed against the vertical surface of a nylon block. The ring-enclosed composite is sheared off at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min with a flat chisel pressing against the edge of the brass ring and connected to the load cell of the testing machine. The analysis of fractured specimens is performed by digitally photographing (Leica MZ16 Optical Stereomicroscope) tooth and iris, and measuring the surface areas of different failure modes (Image J, NIH).
Water sorption (WS)
WS tests are typically performed with the broken disk specimens collected after mechanical testing of dry samples. To determine WS of copolymer and/or composite specimens, a minimum of 7 disks/experimental group are initially dried over CaSO4 until a constant mass (± 0.1 mg). Specimens are then immersed in saline solutions as described for ion release experiments. Gravimetric mass changes of padded dry specimens are recorded at predetermined time intervals. The degree of WS is calculated using a simple equation:
where Wt represents the sample mass at the time t, and Wo is the initial mass of dry sample.
WS data are used to calculate the diffusion coefficient (D) by applying the simplified Fick’s model (valid for the sorption stages when Wt/Weq ≤ 0.6):
where Wt is the mass gain at time t, Weq is the mass gain at the equilibrium, and L is the thickness of the specimen. D is calculated from the slope of the plot of Wt/Weq vs. t1/2.
In some systems, WS is determined by exposing dry specimens to an air atmosphere of 75% relative humidity (RH) at 23 °C (specimens are suspended over saturated NaCl slurry in closed systems) and recording gravimetric changes in the same manner as with saline-immersed specimens. WS data collected at 75% RH are unaffected by dissolution of ACP filler or leaching of water-soluble monomers and/or polymer degradation products (in saline-immersed specimens, these processes typically occur in parallel to WS).
Polymerization shrinkage (PS)
The PS of composite resin samples is measured by a computer-controlled mercury dilatometer developed at the VRC-ADAF. Composite pastes are cured using a standard 60 s/30 s exposure and data acquisition of 60 min + 30 min. The PS of a specimen corrected for temperature fluctuations is plotted as a function of time. The overall shrinkage (volume fraction, %) is calculated based on the known mass of the sample (50 mg–100 mg) and its density. The density is determined by means of the Archimedean displacement principle using an attachment to a microbalance.
Polymerization shrinkage stress (PSS)
The tensometer, designed and fabricated at the VRC-ADAF, is utilized to assess the PSS [50] of the experimental composites. The corresponding software program has also been developed at VRC-ADAF. The design of the sample assembly facilitates convenient sample injection, experimental reproducibility and a short preparation time between the consecutive measurements. The PSS is obtained by dividing the measured tensile force by the cross sectional area of the sample.
Quantitative microradiography
The microradiographic remineralization studies are performed with artificially created caries-like lesions in human and/or bovine enamel. Details on teeth collection, storage, creation of subsurface lesions by immersion in demineralizing solutions (DeS) and the preparation of tooth sections are detailed in [24, 51–53]. Contact microradiographs are produced by exposing the individual tooth specimens to CuKα radiation (40 kV, 3 mA) and developing films according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Mineral density is established relative to sound enamel for each sample. After the initial contact microradiographs are taken, the individual tooth sections are assembled between parafilm and glass cover slips in the following order: cover slip/parafilm/tooth slice/parafilm/cover slip. The demineralized edge of the tooth slice is kept even with one side of the assembly and left exposed while the rest of the assembly is wrapped and embedded in strips of parafilm to seal around the edges. It is then sandwiched between two glass slides, with the exposed edge of the tooth section positioned approximately 1 mm below the slide edges. The demineralized surface is coated with a (1.0 ± 0.1) mm thick layer of the experimental composite, HAP-containing composite and/or the commercial control, or left untreated. Composites are light-cured for 60 s (Triad 2000). After photo-curing, the individual assemblies of composite specimens and/or uncoated controls that required no curing are subjected to pH-cycling regimens which mimic demineralization and remineralization cycles occurring daily in the oral environment. The assembled tooth specimens are alternately immersed at 37 °C, under continuous magnetic stirring (38 rad/s), in DeS (0.5 h) and remineralizing solution (ReS; 11.5 h) for 14 days (bovine teeth series [24]), or in DeS (1 h) and ReS (23 h) for 30 days (human teeth series [51]). At every solution exchange, the assemblies are thoroughly rinsed with distilled water. Mineral profiles of each specimen before and after the completion of the pH cycling regimen [52, 53] are determined by digital-image-analysis of the corresponding contact microradiographs using the commercial system Bioquant IV interfaced with an optical microscope (Leitz) for bovine teeth and Scion Image-release Alpha 4.0.3.2 (NIH) interfaced with an optical microscope (Olympus BX50F) and digital camera (RGB/YC/NTSC; Microimage) for human teeth. Changes in lesion depth and mineral loss (ΔZ) are compared for each imaged area before and after treatment. The difference in summed ΔZ values across the depth of each lesion before and after the pH-cycling regimen, i.e., the relative change in mineral content, Δ(ΔZ) in %, is calculated according to the following equation:
The mean Δ(ΔZ) values obtained for all image areas of each group of specimens were used to indicate remineralization (positive (+) Δ(ΔZ) values) or further demineralization of the lesions (negative (–) Δ(ΔZ) values) as a result of pH-cycling treatment.
Leachability studies: 1H-Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy
Following the extraction of copolymer and composite disk specimens in a series of organic solvents and measuring their total weight loss, the residual solvent-free extracts are analyzed in CDCl3 by 1H-NMR (GSX 270, JEOL). The NMR calibration curves are calculated relative to BHT which is utilized as an inhibitor of monomer polymerization upon extraction. BHT’s shift serves as an internal standard. Detailed description of the methodology and NMR data interpretation is provided in [54].
Micro-leakage (dye penetration)
The appraisal of the sealing efficacy of endodontic materials is not included in the international standards covering root canal sealers. In the absence of standardized test protocol, a number of different in vitro methods are being used for that purpose. We assess the micro-leakage of ACP endodontic sealants by a dye penetration method. For that purpose, root canals of the extracted teeth are prepared as described in [55] and filled with Resilon™ (a synthetic polymer-based root canal filler) and sealed with the experimental ACP sealer (experimental group) or filled with Resilon™ sealed with commercial resin sealer EndoREZ™ (control group). EndoREZ™ is chosen due to the fact that its main resin component is UDMA-based, similar to the experimental ACP material. After curing, specimens are stored in saline solutions at 37 °C for 72 hours to allow sufficient time for the completion of the setting process. The root surfaces, except for the apical 2 mm (in this way dye could penetrate the canal only via apical region) are then covered with two layers of nail varnish and specimens placed into 2% methylene blue dye solution for a week at 37 °C. After removal from the dye solution, washing with distilled water and drying, teeth are sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction through the center of the root. Linear apical leakage is estimated using a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ16, Wetzlar, Germany).
Cell responses to copolymers and ACP composites
To assess the cellular responses to experimental copolymers and their corresponding ACP composites, specimens are typically extracted in media overnight and then the osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1 cells; Riken Cell Bank) are cultured in these extracts [56]. Cytotoxicity is evaluated by phase contrast microscopy and an enzymatic assay is used for mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity (Wst-1).
Prior to extraction experiments, all disk specimens are sterilized with 70% ethanol. Each disk is then washed with 2 mL of media for 1 h and then fresh media was placed on each disk for an overnight extraction in the cell incubator. Positive (containing media with surfactant) and negative (containing only media) controls are evaluated in addition to composite and copolymer specimens. In parallel, a flask of 80% confluent MC3T3-E1 cells were passaged, cells seeded into well plates with 10,000 cells per well in 2 mL of media, and then placed in the incubator overnight. On the second day of the experiment, the medium from each “cell well” is removed and replaced with the 2 mL of extraction medium from one of the disk specimens (or with the positive or negative control media). The cells are incubated in the extracts for 3 d, photographed and then prepared for the cytotoxicity assays.
The Wst-1 colorimetric assays are performed as follows: extract-cultured cells and the controls without cells are combined with a Wst-1 solution (2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitophenyl)-5-(2, 4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt) in HEPES buffer, individually added to wells and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Aliquots from each well are transferred to a well-plate and absorbance is read at 450 n with a plate-reader.
AM activity of copolymers and AMRE composites
To quantify the AM activities of the experimental AM resins and their corresponding AMRE composites, the initial bacterial colonization and suppression of biofilm formation are assessed in the following manner. Copolymer and composite disk specimens are first sterilized with ethanol (70 mass %) for 20 min and then soaked in phosphate buffered saline overnight. To assess the initial bacterial colonization, specimens are inoculated with Streptococcus mutans (S.m.), and then incubated (37 °C, 5 vol. % CO2) for 5 h. Following the incubation, samples are triple-washed to remove non-adherent bacteria, fixed with formaldehyde solution, stained with SYTOX green and imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM). Images are quantified in terms of the total surface area covered by bacteria and the object density and plotted as a function of the concentration of AM component in the resin. To evaluate the ability of the resins and composites to suppress biofilm formation, specimens are inoculated with S.m. in sucrose containing (1 mass %) bovine-heart infusion and incubated for 24 h, 14 days and 1 month. In 14 days and 1 month experiments, broth is replenished daily. The same fixation, staining and the LSCM imaging protocols, and data interpretation are used as for the initial S.m. colonization tests.
Statistical methodology
The number of test specimen for each evaluation step is chosen so that there is a reasonable chance (power) to detect the minimum desired difference between the groups [57]. The variance estimates used in the calculation are obtained from historical data (e.g. previous work or literature). Graphical data analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and other related tests [58, 59] are performed to evaluate the experimental data as a function of composite makeup, storage times or any other relevant factor involved in the experimental design. For those cases where overall statistically significant effects are found with ANOVA, further tests are performed to determine the significant differences between the specific groups using an appropriate multiple comparison procedure. All tests are 2-sided at α = 0.05. Statistical analyses of the data are done by means of Microsoft Excel or NIST Dataplot™, SYSTAT9 or SigmaStat (version 2.03). Throughout this review, one standard deviation (SD) is routinely indicated as the estimated uncertainty of the measurements.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The long-term, ion-releasing characteristics of ACP-based polymeric materials make them especially advantageous in dental applications designed to prevent demineralization and/or promote remineralization. However, bioactive ACP composites are generally relatively weak because ACP does not act as reinforcing filler in a manner similar to that of commonly used silanized glass fillers. The uncontrolled aggregation of ACP during its spontaneous precipitation typically leads to heterogeneous distribution of the filler in the resin, thus hindering the interfacial resin-filler interactions and compromising the mechanical performance. The uneven distribution of highly aggregated filler in composites may also affect the ion release from these materials. To address these shortcomings, surface-modification of ACP fillers and their mechanical milling were explored as described below.
Effects of additives on physicochemical characteristics of ACP fillers and Bis-GMA/TEGDMA composites
The hypothesis was that interactions between the ACP and additives (small ions and surfactant or polymer molecules) would affect the extent of ACP particle aggregation and its stability in aqueous environments. The mechanism and the extent of additive/ACP interaction should primarily depend on the chemical nature of additives. Cation-ACP interactions are expected to be controlled by the ionic potential, i.e., the water coordination number, multiplicity of charge and ionic radius [60]. In the case of polyelectrolytes, the multiplicity of the ionizable groups is expected to be a major regulatory factor. Generally, hybridization of ACP fillers is expected to yield bulk-modified ACPs with greater potential for strengthening the composites without compromising their remineralization potential. To test the above hypotheses, additives were introduced ab initio, the amorphous nature of the resulting solids validated by FTIR, XRD, and the effects of additives on PSD, water content and remineralization potential were assessed. In addition, the BFS and DVC of the composites formulated with Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin and surface-modified ACPs were determined. The results are summarized in fig. 2A, B. Introducing cations, surfactants and polymers during the spontaneous precipitation of ACP from supersaturated Ca and PO4 solutions marginally reduced or had no significant effect on the overall water content of the isolated solids (on average 15.3, 14.8 and 17.1 mass % for cation-, polymer and surfactant-ACPs, respectively, compared to 17.3 mass % for no-additive control). Additives also did not alter the ratio of surface-bound/structurally incorporated water in ACPs; the average ratio of 2.4 suggests that approx. 70% of water in ACPs is labile and the remaining 30% is structurally incorporated. In cation series, the mean particle diameter, dm, decreased in the following order: (Si-, Zr-ACP) > [(Ag-, Fe(II)-, Al-, Fe(III)-ACP) ≥ Zn-ACP]. This decrease in dm was accompanied with the reduction in the PSD range (from up to 80 μm in Si- and Zr-ACP to only 15 μm in other cation ACPs). The unwanted color change occurred in Ag- and both Fe-ACPs. It was due to the co-precipitation of light-sensitive Ag-phosphate and colored Fe-phosphates in parallel to ACPs. In addition, Fe-ACPs showed signs of premature ACP to HAP conversion. The PSD of surfactant-modified ACPs did not significantly change compared to no-additive control except for the anionic fluorosurfactant (FSP), where a 45% reduction in dm was seen. In polymer group, instead of particle size reduction, a 25% and a 90% increases in dm were observed, respectively, with PAA and PEO (irrespective of the PEO molecular mass). The experimental composites formulated with cation-ACPs (Ag+, Fe2+, Zn2+, Al3+, Fe3+ and Si4+), surfactant-ACPs and polymer-ACPs generally exhibited inferior mechanical stability compared to the control ACP. The reduction in BFS varied from 33–45% for surfactant- and polymer-ACPs and 6–100% for cation-ACPs (Ag- and Fe-ACPs disintegrated upon immersion). Only Si- and Zr-ACP based composites showed improvements in DVC (9% and 19%, respectively). Zr-ACP based composites also performed better than control with respect to remineralization potential (22% increase) and BFS (27% increase). For those reasons, Zr-ACP was chosen as “gold standard” filler and was used for all subsequent studies described in this review.
Fig. 2.
Water content (TGA data) and particle size (PSD data; median diameter - dm) of surface-modified ACP fillers (part A). DVC, BFS and remineralization potential [expressed as supersaturation of the immersing solutions [Gibbs free energy, ΔGo]] attained in light-cure Bis-GMA/TEGDMA composites formulated with various ACPs (part B). Number of runs: n ≥ 5 for DVC and BFS measurements, and n ≥ 3 for PSD, TGA and ΔGo assessments. Indicated are mean values with one standard deviation (SD).
Effect of mechanical milling on PSD of the fillers and remineralization potential of the composites
Ball milling (experimental details are provided in [61]) of Zr-ACP filler prior to its utilization in composites is evaluated as an alternative way of reducing the average size of ACP by breaking up large aggregates into smaller agglomerates that will more intimately interact with the resin and disperse more evenly in the composite. The experimental composites were formulated from LC EBPADMA/TEGDMA/HEMA (ETH) resins and the unmilled and milled ACP fillers. The composites were assessed for their mechanical behavior and the kinetics of mineral ion release. Such an assessment is deemed necessary in order to ensure that improvement in mechanical strength of composite is achieved without compromising the remineralizing ability of composites. The results are summarized in table 5.
Table 5.
PSD data (n = 3/group) comparison for the as-made and milled Zr-ACP fillers. The mechanical strength (BFS; n ≥ 3) and the remineralizing potential (ΔGo; n = 3) of the ensuing ETH composites. Indicated are mean values with one standard deviation (SD) given in parenthesis.
| Parameter | Zr-ACP filler (as-made) | Zr-ACP filler (milled) |
|---|---|---|
| Median diameter, dm (μm) | 5.93 (0.69) | 0.90 (0.19) |
| PSD range (μm) | 0.3–80.0 | 0.2–3.0 |
| Specific surface area (m2/g) | 0.49 (0.10) | 3.80 (0.10) |
| as-made Zr-ACP ETH composite | milled Zr-ACP ETH composite | |
| Ionic activity product, IAP | 99.3 (0.7) | 101.2 (1.0) |
| ΔGo (kJ/mole) | 5.7 (0.2) | 5.1 (0.3) |
| BFS (MPa) | 49 (8) | 61 (8) |
While having no apparent effect on the structure (amorphous character retained after milling) and composition (Ca/PO4 ratio and water content of the solids remained unchanged), milling significantly reduced the average size of ACP particulates and the spread of their PSD. Better dispersion of milled Zr-ACP in the resins resulted in the improved BFS of the composites after aqueous immersion. The differences in the BFS values of the ETH composites made with the as-made (coarse) ACP and milled (fine) ACP may possibly be explained by the different degrees of water penetration at the ACP/resin interfaces. Thus, an accelerated diffusion and enhanced hydration most likely occurred in composites made with as-made ACP while these same processes were inhibited or reduced in composites with milled ACP. Milled-ACP composites also maintained satisfactory ion release. The maximum concentrations of Ca and PO4 ions released from milled ACP-containing disks into immersing solutions remained highly supersaturated with respect to HAP, thus preserving a significant remineralization potential of these composites.
ACP sealants and/or base/liners
Initially, bioactive composites formulated as a remineralizing sealant and base/liner comprised hybrid Zr-ACP and a polymer blend of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA, plus HEMA and/or ZrDMA (BT, BTH and BTHZ resins; [20–23]). However, the mechanical strength of these composites, even after silanization of the filler, remained inferior to that of the conventional, bioinert, silanized glass-filled dental composites, thus diminishing the clinical appeal of these ACP materials. To possibly make ACP composites more clinically attractive, we included various surface-active monomers (X) with potentially stronger affinity for ACP into ternary Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/X blends and assessed their effects on DVC and BFS of the ensuing ACP/BTX composites. Differently structured neutral and/or acidic monomers with varying hydrophilicity included hydroxyl- and/or carboxylic acid-containing monomers (Table 6). They were expected to interact favorably with ACP via hydrogen-bonding and ion-binding. Besides possibly enhancing the mechanical performance of the composites, inclusion of X in the resins was also expected to yield composites with the uncompromised DVC.
Table 6.
Composition (mass %) of experimental BTX resins. X = DEGMEMA, GDMA, GMA, HEMA, MEMA and photoinitiator system = CQ (0.2 mass %) and 4EDMAB (0.8 mass %) in neutral termonomer series. X = MA, MaA, 4MET, VPA and photoinitiator = PbTMBPO (2.0 mass %) in acidic termonomer series. The termonomer (X) was introduced at mass level corresponding to an equivalent molar mas of HEMA (neutral termonomer series) or 4MET (acidic termonomer series). HEMA level in BTH resin corresponded to the concentration yielding the most favorable ion release properties [22]. The level of 4MET in BT4M formulation was determined by its solubility in BH resin.
| Resin/monomer | Bis-GMA | TEGDMA | HEMA | MEMA | DEGMEMA | GMA | GDMA | VPA | MA | MaA | 4MET |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||
| BTn | 49.5 | 49.5 | |||||||||
| BTH | 37.0 | 37.0 | 25.0 | ||||||||
| BTM | 35.7 | 35.7 | 27.6 | ||||||||
| BTD | 31.5 | 31.5 | 36.0 | ||||||||
| BTGm | 34.0 | 34.0 | 31.0 | ||||||||
| BTGd | 27.0 | 27.0 | 45.0 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| BTa | 49.0 | 49.0 | |||||||||
| BTV | 48.2 | 48.2 | 1.6 | ||||||||
| BTMA | 48.4 | 48.4 | 1.2 | ||||||||
| BTMaA | 48.2 | 48.2 | 1.6 | ||||||||
| BT4M | 46.6 | 46.6 | 4.8 | ||||||||
The results of the BFS testing (after immersion in saline) and DVC screening (24 h-post LC) for both BTX series are presented in fig. 3. In BT/neutral termonomer series, the mean BFS value of the BTn control [(52.3 ± 5.1) MPa] significantly exceeded the BFS values of all formulations [on average (29.9 ± 7.9) MPa]. Disruption by water of the hydrogen bond-mediated crosslinks may explain this precipitous drop in BFS values. In BT/acidic termonomer series, the BFS values decreased in the following order: BT4M [(66.5 ± 13.3) MPa] > BTa control [(48.4 ± 6.7) MPa] > BTMA, BTV and BTMaA [average (32.0 ± 4.2) MPa]. Generally, the reduced mechanical strength in acidic BTXs series is caused by reduction in ACP’s intactness and rigidity at the filler/matrix interface due to the chemical reactions involving carboxylic groups and ACP, special changes that may have occurred during Ca and/or PO4 ion efflux, internal ACP to HAP conversion and excessive water sorption. It is, however, significant that 4MET comonomer yielded composites with improved mechanical strength. DVC data analysis indicated the following order in neutral termonomer series: BTD [(75.3 ± 3.3) %] > BTH, BTn and BTGm [(67.5 ± 1.5) %] > BTM and BTGd [(61.3 ± 3.3) %]. The DVC of composites in BT/acidic series showed practically no dependence on structural variations of the acidic comonomer [average DVC = (66.0 ± 3.0) %]. The monomer system based on DEGMEMA, i.e., the BTD resin, showed the highest DVC probably because of the highly flexible nature of this monomer. As a result of this study, it would seem that the inclusion of DEGMEMA and 4MET, at optimum levels into the polymer matrices may aid in attaining a higher level of DVC while maintaining the mechanical integrity of composites upon aqueous immersion.
Fig. 3.
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/X (X = neutral or acidic termonomer) composites. Post-immersion BFS (n ≥ 5) and DVC 24 h post LC (n ≥ 6). Indicated are mean values + SD.
ACP orthodontic composites
Fine tuning of the resin composition was utilized to tailor remineralizing ACP EBPADMA-based composites for orthodontic applications. In our earlier work [14], EBPADMA, TEGDMA and HEMA were identified as a base monomer, a diluent monomer and a surface-active monomer, respectively, in polymers yielding high levels of DVC. High DVC would imply low leachability of unreacted monomeric species, thus making the composites more biocompatible. Hydrophilic TEGDMA and HEMA monomers at high levels, however, may adversely affect the mechanical properties of composites due to the excessive WS upon aqueous exposure. For these reasons, chemistry and composition of the LC EBPADMA/TEGDMA/HEMA resin (photoinitiator: IRGACURE 1850 at 1 mass %) were tuned by changing the EBPADMA/TEGDMA ratio (mass ratio 1.00, 0.67, 0.50 and 0.25 corresponding to molar ratios of 0.500, 0.333, 0.250 and 0.125, respectively) and lowering the content of HEMA to 10 mass % while including less hydrophilic carboxylic acid monomer MEP at 5 mass %. The ensuing resins were annotated ETHM100, ETHM067, ETHM050 and ETHM025. The inclusion of MEP was expected to enhance the adhesion of composite to tooth surfaces due to its known surface activity. In addition, MEP was also expected to provide more adhesive interphase via carboxylate-ACP interactions that would promote ACP/resin coherence. Additionally, WS and PS were expected to be reduced without a detrimental effect on the remineralizing potential and/or mechanical strength of the composites. The results are presented in fig. 4 (BFS and DVC) and fig. 5 (WS, PS and remineralization potential). Generally, the BFS [overall value (47 ± 7) MPa], DVC [overall value (84.0 ± 5.2) %], WS [overall value (3.45 ± 0.50) %] and the remineralizing capacity [overall ΔGo = −(4.66 ± 0.31) kJ/mole] of ETHM composites showed no correlation with the resin matrix composition. However, the PS increased with decreasing EBPADMA/TEGDMA ratio in the resin. In comparison with the typical Bis-GMA based polymers, those based on a more hydrophobic analog of Bis-GMA, i.e., EBPADMA should, generally, exhibit higher DVC and lower PS. Regardless of the EBPADMA/TEGDMA ratio in the resin, the ETHM composites attained significantly higher DVCs compared to Bis-GMA-based BTX composites [84.0% vs. (61.3 to 75.3) %, respectively]. This increase in DVC values is primarily attributed to the bulkier yet flexible structure and lower viscosity of EBPADMA compared to Bis-GMA resin systems.
Fig. 4.
EBPADMA/TEGDMA/HEMA/MEP composites. BFS after 40 days of immersion in buffered saline (n ≥ 5) and DVC 24 h post LC (n ≥ 6). Indicated are mean values + SD.
Fig. 5.
The thermodynamic stability of the solutions containing maximum concentrations of Ca and PO4 ions released from EBPADMA/TEGDMA/HEMA/MEP (ETHM) composites (Gibbs free energy indicates relative supersaturation with respect to stoichiometric HAP (n ≥ 4)), PS (n ≥ 3) and the maximum WS values (after 42 d exposure to 75% RH at room temperature; n ≥ 5) of ETHM composites. Indicated are mean values + SD.
The PS of ETHM composites was apparently controlled by the relative content of the high molecular mass EBPADMA in the polymer matrix. Although highly desirable in order to render resin matrices less susceptible to the softening effects of the oral media and keep unwanted leachables at minimum, high DVC also resulted in higher PS. The reduction in the PS of ETHM composites, based on the inclusion of higher levels of EBPADMA relative to TEGDMA may be necessary to make them more appealing for orthodontic applications. The mechanical strength (i.e. BFS) and the WS of ETHM composites were unaffected by the composition of the resin. The average WS of ACP/ETHM composites falls within the range reported for commercially available bonding resins (< 4 mass % [62]). It seems that the uneven dispersion of large ACP aggregates within the ETHM polymers controlled the overall mechanical performance of composites. Better control of both the PSD and surface properties of the ACP filler may be required to enhance ACP/ETHM matrix interactions and make these composites amenable as orthodontic adhesives. Generally, the enhanced ion release from composites formulated with EBPADMA and HEMA in their polymer phase is attributed to the tendency of EBPADMA to form less densely cross-linked polymeric networks and the potential of HEMA to promote mineral saturation via increased water uptake. In ETHM composite series, a moderate reduction in remineralizing ability compared to non-MEP containing ETH composites [ΔGoETHM = −4.66 kJ/mole vs. ΔGoETH = −5.07 kJ/mole] was due to the inclusion of 5 mass % MEP into the resin. Overall ion release, although significantly above the theoretical minimum necessary for remineralization, diminished because of the lower levels of free calcium in the solution. This reduction in solution calcium levels was caused by concomitant calcium binding by the carboxylic functionalities of MEP.
ACP endodontic materials
The working hypothesis was that resins (designated UPHM) comprising UDMA (47.2 mass %), PEG-U (29.1 mass %), HEMA (16.7 mass %) and MEP (2.9 mass %), and their ACP composites would attain high DVCs without excessive PS and/or PSS while maintaining desirable remineralization potential. In addition, the anticipated relatively high WS of ACP/UPHM composites was expected to be accompanied by their significant hygroscopic expansion (HE) upon aqueous immersion. It was also expected that the relatively high WS will not diminish the mechanical strength of composites more than it is customarily seen in other types of ACP methacrylate composites. To test these hypotheses, DC UPHM copolymers and composites were formulated with as-made and milled Zr-ACP (40 mass %) and tested for DVC, BFS, WS, HE, PS and PSS. DC systems [LC: Irgacure 1850 (1.0 mass %); CC: BPO (2.0 mass %) + DHEPT (1 mass %] were investigated since, due to the nature of the intended application, LC alone was considered as clinically inadequate. Sr-glass/UPHM composites (70 mass % filler) were used as a control. The results are summarized in figs. 6–8. DC ACP UPHM composites, generally, attained high DVC [overall value (81.7 ± 2.4) %] and a moderate to low BFS values [overall (45 ± 7) MPa]. Both DVC and BFS of composites formulated for endodontic uses paralleled the values obtained with the ACP ETHM composites intended for orthodontic application. The high DVCs attained in ACP UPHM composites, similarly to ACP ETHM formulations intended for orthodontic utility, again suggest a minimal possibility for leachability of unreacted monomers and/or components of the initiator systems, and, consequently, a minimal likelihood of adverse cellular responses to these composites. In DC systems, a paste hardened within less than 10 minutes of mixing the CC components. Some degree of contraction occurred even before the sample was placed in dilatometer, making DC material unsuitable for measurement by this method. The PS measured in LC ACP UTHM composites [overall (7.0 ± 0.3) vol %] significantly exceeded the PS values of the glass-filled control [(4.4 ± 0.1) vol %]. However, normalizing PS values of the glass control to the resin/filler ratio of ACP composites brought them in line, with an average of 7.7 vol %. Similarly, the PSS developed in ACP UTHM composites [overall (3.7 ± 0.3) MPa] was higher than the PSS in glass-filled UTHM control [(2.2 ± 0.1) MPa]. These elevated PS values are significantly higher than the typical PS values reported for the commercial restoratives [(1.9–4.1) vol %] and flowable composites [(3.6–6.0) vol %]. At the same time the PS of ACP UPHM composites only slightly exceed the lower end values for the PS of adhesive resins [(6.7–13.5) vol %] [14]. This relatively high PS may, at least partially, be attributed to the intensified hydrogen bonding in UPHM resins with still relatively high content of HEMA (close to 17 mass %). The measured PSS values compare well with the PSS development in as-made binary UDMA/HEMA composites [63]. This would suggest that the actual stress resulting from the polymerization shrinkage in UPHM matrices was not elevated by the simultaneous inclusion of PEG-U and HEMA into polymer phase. The maximum WS values of specimens exposed to 75% RH, reached within two weeks, decreased in the following order: as-made ACP composite > (milled ACP composite, copolymer) > Sr-glass composite. The increases in mass of the specimens upon immersion in saline were 2.5 to 3 times compared to the corresponding specimens exposed to RH. The WS of immersed specimens decreased in the following order: (milled ACP composite, as-made ACP composite) > copolymer > Sr-glass composite. The HE of the specimens followed the same pattern. The kinetics of Ca and PO4 release from both as-made and milled ACP UPHM composites were favorable and yielded solution supersaturations conducive to mineral re-deposition. A significant HE of ACP UTHM composites (up to 14 vol %) may be particularly useful in combating relatively high stress that develops in these materials. The potential benefits of HE have been reported by other researchers [64, 65].
Fig. 6.
BFS (after 3 months of immersion in buffered saline) and DVC (24 h and 5 days post-cure) of UDMA/PEG-U/HEMA/MEP (UPHM) copolymers and composites. Indicated are mean values + SD (n = 5).
Fig. 8.
The maximum WS (after 3 months exposure to 75% RH or immersion in buffered saline at room temperature), the corresponding HE of ACP UPHM composites and supersaturation of the immersing solutions containing maximum concentrations of Ca and PO4 ions released from the composites (non-applicable for copolymer and control group). Indicated are mean values + SD (n = 5).
To assess in vitro cytotoxicity of ACP/UPHM composites, their specimens were extracted in media and murine pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) and then cultured in extracts for 24 h. Extracts from a commercial endo-sealer (CES) were used as a reference. Medium without any extract and medium with added surfactant were used as a negative and a positive control, respectively. Morphology of cells exposed to different extracts was followed in situ by optical microscopy. Cells exposed to ACP/UPHM and CES extracts showed a contracted, spherical morphology (not shown here) and almost 2.5 times slower proliferation than the spread, polygonal cells in medium-only control. Significantly, similar morphological changes and proliferation rates were reported in hydrogel scaffolds designed for bone regeneration, in which pre-osteoblasts generated bone-like minerals [66]. The results of dehydrogenase activity (MTT assay) are shown in fig. 9. Based on these results, and regardless of the observed changes in cell morphology, our experimental ACP/UPHM composite is a viable candidate for the intended endodontic application (its cytotoxicity does not exceed the cytotoxicity of the commercial referent material).
Fig. 9.
MTT assay values (mean + SD; n = 3) for the experimental ACP UPHM endodontic composites, commercial control sealer and negative (medium + surfactant) and positive (medium only) controls.
To compare the apical micro-leakage (ML) of the ACP/UPHM sealer vs. the commercial material with the similar resin composition, we measured the penetration of the methylene blue dye solution after 72 h immersion at 37 °C. Root canals of single-rooted human teeth were treated step-wise with: 1) experimental PIDAA/PMDMA primer or Resilon primer, 2) experimental ACP/UPHM sealer or Resilon sealer, and 3) Gutta percha or Resilon filler. None of the eight treatment protocols provided highly desirable hermetic seal (Table 7).
Table 7.
Micro-leakage (ML; mean + SD; n ≥ 5) of the sectioned root canal specimens primed with PIDAA/PMDMA or Resilon™ primer, sealed with the experimental Zr-ACP UPHM composite or Resilon™ sealer and filled with Gutta percha or Resilon™ filler. ML is expressed as a distance between the apical foramen and the 95% unstained dentin boundary. PIDAA/PMDMA solutions and the experimental ACP/UPHM composite were prepared in our Laboratory. Resilon™-Epiphany kits and Gutta percha were procured commercially.
| Primer | Sealer | Filler | Micro-leakage (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIDAA/PMDMA | Zr-ACP UPHM | Gutta percha | 5.5 ± 4.5 |
| PIDAA/PMDMA | Zr-ACP UPHM | Resilon™ | 8.9 ± 3.5 |
| PIDAA/PMDMA | Resilon™ | Gutta percha | 9.0 ± 1.3 |
| PIDAA/PMDMA | Resilon™ | Resilon™ | 9.7 ± 3.9 |
| Resilon™ | Zr-ACP UPHM | Gutta percha | 10.0 ± 2.3 |
| Resilon™ | Zr-ACP UPHM | Resilon™ | 9.5 ± 3.1 |
| Resilon™ | Resilon™ | Gutta percha | 11.1 ± 5.5 |
| Resilon™ | Resilon™ | Resilon™ | 11.3 ± 5.0 |
While one-way ANOVA indicated no significant differences between treatments, multiple pair-wise analysis lead to the following conclusions: on average, root canals treated with ACP/UPHM sealer leaked less than those sealed with commercial products [(8.5 ± 3.4) mm vs. (10.3 ± 3.9) mm, respectively]. The treatments including experimental primer and ACP/UTHM sealer leaked the least distance from the apex. It is hard to explain generally the very high ML values seen in all groups tested. Inconsistency in root canal preparation should be excluded since a highly experienced endodontist was involved in its preparation. It is unlikely that the inconsistencies in application of primers, sealers and fillers lead to the extensive leakage since established protocols were strictly followed. It is, however, possible that for the teeth that were completely saturated with dye, during specimen sectioning with the saw blade while cooling with water, the interior of the tooth was coated with the residual methylene blue. High ML values could also be explained by assuming that the majority of the teeth used in the study were collected from young patients whose root dentine is typically highly penetrable. However, since the teeth obtained from the local area dentists have no identifiers, our assumption cannot be corroborated. Our results contradict the reported ability of Resilon™ to provide an almost hermetic seal [55] and merit further evaluation of our experimental material. For that purpose, less error-susceptible methodology (fluid filtration and/or bacterial filtration) should be employed in future to re-confirm or dispute the findings of this study.
Leachability of unreacted monomers and the components of the photo-initiator system from UPHM copolymers and ACP composites were quantified by the 1H-NMR, a valuable technique that provides both qualitative and quantitative information without a burden of a complex sample preparation and data interpretation. The results are shown in fig. 10. A (0.3–14.3) mass % and (0.3–10.4) mass % of initially incorporated monomers leached out from UPHM copolymers and ACP UPHM composites, respectively. Levels of CQ in the extracts were undetectable in both copolymers and composite series. The highest level leachability was detected with a photo-reductant, 4EDMAB (32.88 and 24.36 mass % in copolymers and composites, respectively). It is difficult to make a meaningful comparison of our leachability data with data reported in literature for several reasons. Firstly, the compositional makeup of the resins as well as the type and the load of fillers differ greatly from material to material. Secondly, researchers are employing a broad range of variable extraction conditions (solvent type, duration of extraction, ratio of specimen surface area/solvent volume, etc.). Thirdly, data are collected by using a variety of analytical methods. However, it is significant that the levels of unreacted HEMA detected in UPHM systems (0.03 mM) remained several orders of magnitude lower than the levels of HEMA typically released from restorative resins [(0.2–0.4) mM] and/or resin composites (up to 3 mM). This finding is particularly important having in mind the increased toxicity and adverse side effects reported for HEMA, which in the milieu metabolizes into methacrylic acid [67]. Furthermore, the level of the unreacted UDMA in UPHM formulations [(0.1–0.2) mM)] compares favorably with the concentrations of leached UDMA [(0.3–0.5) mM] reported for a wide range of the experimental UDMA/TEGDMA resins [68]. In conclusion, as a consequence of high DVC values attained in UPHM formulations, leachables from the UPHM specimens apparently did not exceed levels of leachables seen in commercial materials. In the complex UPHM polymer network, small molecular weight monomers such as HEMA, do not necessarily elute more than the higher molecular weight UDMA, as would be expected based on HEMA’s mobility alone.
Fig. 10.
Fractions of the initially incorporated monomers and photo-initiators detected in BHT-containing (0.01 mass % added to prevent secondary post-extraction polymerization) acetone extracts [7-day continuous extraction at 23 °C and magnetic stirring (32 rad/s)] of UPHM copolymers and their ACP composites. Indicated are mean values + SD; n = 3/group.
Quantitative remineralization studies
The remineralizing in vitro studies are considered to be a decisive proof that regeneration of lost tooth mineral indeed occurred upon the application of bioactive ACP composites. Quantitative remineralization efficacy studies were performed with the experimental ACP sealant (LC Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/HEMA/ZrDMA (BTHZ) resin; substrate – bovine teeth) and orthodontic adhesive (LC EBPADMA/TEGDMA/HEMA/MEP (ETHM) resin; substrate – human teeth). Results are summarized in fig. 11. Both types of experimental ACP composites showed superior remineralization activity compared with the controls. In experiments with bovine teeth, ACP sealant supported a significant mineral recovery (38.95% on average) while further demineralization took place in HAP/BTHZ and no-composite controls. In experiments with human teeth, remineralizing effect of the experimental ACP orthodontic adhesive was much stronger than that of F-releasing commercial control (14.38% vs. 4.41% mineral recovery, respectively). In contrast, no-composite control in ortho-adhesive series exhibited additional 55.65% mineral loss. In both studies, experimental design included accelerated acid attacks to account for effects of the prolonged service in more compressed timeframe. It is especially significant that in both bovine and human substrates, remineralization took place throughout the depth of the lesions rather than being confined to the regions near the surface. Such surface-restricted mineral recovery is typically seen in F-stimulated remineralization. In conclusion, both ACP/BTHZ and ACP/ETHM composites indeed provided necessary building blocks for restoration of tooth enamel. They could be used alone or in combination with F-releasing materials for both prevention and repair of carious lesions.
Fig. 11.
Changes in mineral density upon specimen exposure to the pH-cycling regimen: ACP sealant (left) and orthodontic ACP adhesive series (right). Shown are mean Δ(ΔZ) values ± SD. Number of tooth specimens ≥ 4/group; number of analyzed microradiographic areas ≥ 8.
Groundwork for the future design of AMRE composites
Two cationic liquid QA monomers, bis(2-methacryloyloxy-ethyl) dimethylammonium bromide (IDMA-1) and 1,1′-bis[o-(2-methacryloyloxyethyl 2′methylphenylene) dimethylammonium bromide (IDMA-2) were successfully prepared and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. IDMA-1 and IDMA-2 both displayed new bands at 1089 cm−1, 1048 cm−1, 886 cm−1 and 858 cm−1, and IDMA-2 also at 981 cm−1 and 712 cm−1. These bands arise from vibrations of the NR4+ complexes (NR4+ groups have bands in the 1100 cm−1 to 450 cm−1 region [41]). Additional broad bands at 3412 cm−1 and 550 cm−1 were from hydrogen-bonded water. Proton-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) confirmed the assigned structures of IDMA-1 and IDMA-2. The AM action of IDMA-1 containing Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resins was assessed by measuring surface charge density, bacterial attachment, macrophage viability and enzymatic activity. Fluorescein binding to the cationic QA groups revealed significant increases in the levels of QA sites on the surfaces of polymers with higher IDMA-1 content. Polymers with 30% IDMA-1 had approximately 200 times more QA sites than other formulations. IDMA-1 reduced bacteria colonization at all tested concentrations. Also, bacterial morphology on the surfaces was altered on polymers containing 30 mass % IDMA-1. Image analysis (single fluorescent entities) confirmed that both density and surface coverage of Streptococcus mutans (Fig. 12) were significantly reduced in the presence of IDMA-1 compared to no IDMA-1 controls. There were, however, no significant differences among the IDMA-1 levels for either bacterial adhesion parameter.
Fig. 12.
Changes (mean value + SD) in relative surface density of Streptococcus mutans or relative surface coverage by bacteria as a function of IDMA-1 concentration in Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/IDMA (BTI) resin. Control density: (37,700 ± 5,700) objects/mm2. Control surface coverage: (10 ± 2) %.
Viability staining was used to assess macrophage density and viability (Fig. 13). The incorporation of 10% IDMA-1 significantly reduced cell density, and 20% and 30% IDMA-1 further reduced the density as compared to both 0% and 10% IDMA-1. Significantly cell viability was unchanged at 10% IDMA-1 but significantly reduced by 20% and 30% IDMA-1. Therefore, although the cell density was much lower with 10% IDMA-1 as compared to no IDMA control, the cell viability was not affected significantly. Macrophages on polymer disks (disk cells), as well as cells in the same wells as the polymer disks but adherent to the tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) substrate, were evaluated independently (graphs not shown here). The results for the disk cell MTT activity agreed well with the viability results. At 10 mass %, IDMA-1 did not significantly affect the MTT activity while at higher IDMA-1 levels the MTT activity was significantly reduced. The results for the TCPS cells, however, showed no significant changes in MTT activity as a result of the inclusion of IDMA-1. It is clear from this screening that a desired AM effect on pathogens and potential cytotoxicity of the AM agent to mammalian cells need to be carefully balanced. These aspects will strongly impact the design of a new family of AMRE composites.
Fig. 13.
Macrophage density and viability (inset) as a function of IDMA-1 concentration in BTI resin. Indicated are mean values + SD.
CONCLUSION
In order to understand the structure-composition-property relationships in bioactive ACP-based polymeric materials, a battery of comprehensive physicochemical and mechanical tests applied to ACP fillers, copolymers and composites is required. These tests are particularly useful for identifying the complex mechanisms that govern interactions between the ion-releasing, remineralizing filler and the polymer phase. Typically highly clustered ACP solids with a wide PSD can efficiently be converted into ACPs with narrower PSD. This is achieved by milling rather than ACP’s surface modification via introducing additives during the spontaneous precipitation of ACP. The ACPs with narrower PSD yielded composites with more uniform filler distribution and improved mechanical properties while having no detrimental effect on their remineralizing ability.
Resins formulated for sealant, orthodontic and/or endodontic applications (Bis-GMA-, EBPADMA and UDMA-based, respectively) and their ensuing ACP composites typically attained high DVCs with the inclusion of the relatively high amounts [(10.0–29.2) mass %] of the mono-functional and highly-diffusive HEMA monomer into their resin phase. However, these high DVCs were accompanied by PS values exceeding those reported for the majority of commercial composites. This phenomenon can be partially explained by the much lower level of ACP filler in our experimental materials compared to the commercial controls (40 mass % vs. up to 85 mass %, respectively). In UDMA-based formulations, this high PS should be compensated by the high HE of the composites upon aqueous immersion.
Water-ACP filler and water-resin interactions are strong determinants of both mechanical integrity of the composites and their remineralization potential. Generally, ACP fillers, unlike silanized glass fillers, have no reinforcing ability and introducing ACP into resins typically diminished the mechanical performance of the composites compared to the corresponding polymers. The remineralizing potential of the composites was typically higher in EBPADMA- and UDMA-based polymers containing HEMA alone or HEMA plus PEG-U as co-monomers. The effect was attributed to the more open cross-linked network existing in these formulations as well as the hydrophilic character of HEMA leading to a higher water uptake and increased internal mineral saturation.
In vitro cytotoxicity evaluations that compare the experimental material with the representative commercial control are a good indicator of the material’s appropriateness for the intended application. These tests need to be combined with the leachability studies and properly designed AM screening. Of particular importance would be assessing cellular toxicity of AMRE composites before the experimental material could be recommended for further evaluation in either animal models studies and/or clinical trials.
The findings of our continuing studies on bioactive ACP composites and the guidelines resulting from these studies have a potential to be used in future design of biodegradable, mineralization-supporting polymeric materials for the generalized bone repair.
Fig. 7.
PS and PSS of UPHM composites. Indicated are mean values + SD (n = 3).
Acknowledgments
The reported work was supported by the American Dental Association Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (grants DE13169 and DE26122). Generous contribution of the monomers from Esstech, Essington, PA, USA is also gratefully acknowledged.
ABBREVIATIONS
- AAS
atomic absorption spectroscopy sole
- ACP
amorphous calcium phosphate
- ADAF
American Dental Association Foundation
- AES
atomic emission spectroscopy
- AM
antimicrobial
- am-ACP
as-made ACP
- AMRE
antimicrobial & remineralizing
- ANOVA
analysis of variance
- BFS
biaxial flexure strength
- BHT
butylated hydroxytoluene
- Bis-GMA
2,2-bis[p-(2′-hydroxy-3′-methacryloxypropoxy) phenyl]-propane
- BPO
benzoyl peroxide
- BT
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin
- BTD
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/DEGMEMA resin
- BTGd
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/GDMA resin
- BTGm
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/GMA resin
- BTH
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/HEMA resin
- BTI
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/IDMA resin
- BT4M
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/4MET resin
- BTMA
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/A resin
- BTMaA
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/MaA resin
- BTV
Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/VPA resin
- CC
chemical cure
- CQ
camphorquinone
- CaP
calcium phosphate
- CES
commercial endodontic sealer
- CPP
casein phospho-peptide
- D
diffusion coefficient
- DC
dual cure
- DEGMEMA
di(ethyleneglycol)methyl ether methacrylate
- DHEPT
2,2-dihydroxyethyl-p-toluidine
- DeS
demineralizing solution
- dm
median diameter
- DVC
degree of vinyl conversion
- EBPADMA
ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate
- 4EDMAB
ethyl-4-N, N-dimethylaminobenzoate
- FSP
anionic fluorosurfactant
- ETHM
EBPADMA/TEGDMA/HEMA/MEP resin
- FTIR
Fourier-transform infrared
- FTIR-m
FTIR microspectroscopy
- ΔG0
Gibbs free energy
- GMA
glyceryl monomethacrylate
- GDMA
glyceryl dimethacrylate
- HAP
hydroxyapatite
- HE
hygroscopic expansion
- HEMA
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
- 1850 Irgacure
bis(2,6-dimethoxybenzoyl)- 2,4,4-triethylpentyl phosphine oxide & 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone
- IAP
ion activity product
- IDMA-1
bis(2-methacryloyloxy-ethyl) dimethylammonium bromide
- IDMA-2
1,1′-bis [o-(2- methacryloyloxyethyl 2′methylphenylene) dimethylammonium bromide
- Ksp
thermodynamic solubility product
- LSCM
laser scanning confocal microscopy
- MaA
maleic acid
- m-ACP
milled ACP
- MA
methacrylic acid
- MEP
methacryloyloxyethyl phthalate
- 4MET
mono-4-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl trimellitate
- MTT
dehydrogenase activity assay
- NIR
near-infrared
- NMR
nuclear magnetic resonance
- PAA
poly (acrylic acid)
- PbTMBPO
phenyl-bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide
- PEO
poly (ethylene oxide)
- PIDAA
phenyliminodiacetic acid
- PEG-U
poly(ethyleneglycol)-extended UDMA
- PMDMA
adduct of pyromellitic dianhydride and HEMA
- PSD
particle size distribution
- PS
polymerization shrinkage
- PSS
polymerization shrinkage stress
- QA
quaternary ammonium
- QS
quorum sensing
- ReS
remineralizing solution
- RH
relative humidity
- SD
standard deviation
- SBS
shear bond strength
- SEM
scanning electron microscopy
- S.m.
Streptococcus mutans
- T
absolute temperature
- TGA
thermogravimetric analysis
- TEGDMA
triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate
- UDMA
urethane dimethacrylate
- UPHM
UDMA/PEG-U/HEMA/MEP resin
- UV/VIS
ultraviolet/visible
- VRC
Volpe research center
- WS
water sorption
- XRD
X-ray diffraction
- ΔZ
mineral content of the lesion
- Δ(ΔZ)
relative change in mineral content
Footnotes
DISCLAIMER
Certain commercial materials and equipments are identified in this article for the sole purpose of adequately defining the experimental protocols. In no instance does such identification imply endorsement and/or recommendation by the American Dental Association Foundation and the National Institute of Standards and Technology or that the material/equipment identified is the best available for the purpose.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.LeGeros RZ. Calcium Phosphates in Oral Biology and Medicine. Karger; Switzerland: 1991. p. 1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dorozhkin SV. Biomatter. 2011;1(1):3. doi: 10.4161/biom.1.1.16782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dorozhkin SV. Biomatter. 2011;1(2):121. doi: 10.4161/biom.18790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang L, Nancollas GH. Chem Rev. 2009;108:4628. doi: 10.1021/cr0782574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao J, Liu Y, Sun W, Zhang H. Chem Centr J. 2011;5:40. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-5-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meyer JL, Eanes ED. Calcif Tissue Res. 1978;25:59. doi: 10.1007/BF02010752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tadic D, Peters F, Epple M. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2553. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00390-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boskey AL. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1433. doi: 10.1177/00220345970760080501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weiner S, Sagi I, Addadi L. Science. 2005;309:1027. doi: 10.1126/science.1114920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weiner S. Bone. 2006;39(3):431. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.02.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He G, Dahl T, Veis A, George A. Nature Materials. 2003;2(8):552. doi: 10.1038/nmat945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsuji T, Omima K, Yamamoto A, Ijima M, Shiba K. PNAS. 2008;105(44):16866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804277105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beniash E, Metzler RA, Lam RSK, Gilbert PUPA. J Struct Biol. 2009;166(2):133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2003;108(3):167. doi: 10.6028/jres.108.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pendrys DG, Stamm JW. J Dent Res. 1990;69:529. doi: 10.1177/00220345900690S107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reynolds EC, Cai F, Cochrane NJ, Shen P, Walker GD, Morgan MV, Reynolds C. J Dent Res. 2008;87(4):344. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reynolds EC. 5015268 US Patent. 1991
- 18.Reynolds EC, Chain CJ, Weber FL, Black CL, Riley PF, Johnson IH, Perich JW. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1272. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740060601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reynolds EC. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1587. doi: 10.1177/00220345970760091101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Skrtic D, Eanes ED, Antonucci JM. In: Industrial Biotechnological Polymers. Gebelein CG, Charraher CE, editors. Technomics Publ. Co; Lancaster: 1995. p. 393. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED. Dent Mater. 1996;12:295. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80037-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED, Eichmiller FC, Schumacher GE. J Biomed Mat Res (Appl Biomater) 2000;53:381. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<381::aid-jbm12>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Antonucci JM, Skrtic D, Eanes ED. In: Hydrogels and Biodegradable Polymers for Bioapplications. Ottenbrite R, Huang S, Park K, editors. Vol. 627. 1996. p. 243. ACS Symposium Series. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Skrtic D, Hailer AW, Takagi S, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED. J Dent Res. 1996;75(9):1679. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750091001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ewoldsen N, Demke RS. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120(1):45. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.117207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Owers JM, Kim HB, Turner DS. Seminars in Orthodontics. 1997;3(3):147. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bergenholtz G, Spangberg L. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(2):99. doi: 10.1177/154411130401500204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dorn SO, Gartner AH. J Endod. 1990;16:391. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81912-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12:161. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dragoo MR. Int J Periodont Res Dent. 1997;17:75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van Noort R. An Introduction to Dental Materials. 4. Elsevier/Mosby; UK: 2013. Glass-ionomer Cements and Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cements. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Torabinejad M, Chivian N. J Endod. 1999;25:197. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Weldon JK, Jr, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Imbrough WF. J Endod. 2002;28:467. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200206000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee YL, Lee BS, Lin FH, Yun LA, Lan WH, Lin CP. Biomaterials. 2004;25:787. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00591-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee YL, Lin FH, Wang WH, Ritchie HH, Lan WH, Lin CP. J Dent Res. 2007;86(6):534. doi: 10.1177/154405910708600609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tanomaru FM, Figueiredo FA, Tanomaru JM. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2005;19:119. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Imazato S. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):11. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS, Fedorowicz Z, Marchesan MA. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;8(3):CD007819. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007819.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bodor N, Kaminski JJ, Selk S. J Med Chem. 1980;23(5):469. doi: 10.1021/jm00179a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Antonucci JM. 8,217,081 B2 US Patent. 2012
- 41.Antonucci JM, Zeiger DN, Tang K, Lin-Gibson S, Fowler BO, Lin NJ. Den Mater. 2012;28:219. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weng Y, Howard L, Guo X, Chong VJ, Gregory RL, Xie D. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2012;23:1553. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4629-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gule NP, Bshena O, de Kwaadsteniet M, Cloete TE, Klumperman B. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:3138. doi: 10.1021/bm300932u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lönn-Stensrud J. PhD Thesis. University of Oslo; Norway: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 45.O’Donnell JNR, Antonucci JM, Skrtic D. J Comp Mater. 2008;42(21):2231. doi: 10.1177/0021998308094797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Murphy J, Riley JP. Anal Chim Act. 1962;27:31. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED, Eidelman N. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1141. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kirsten AF, Woley RM. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1967;71C:1. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ban S, Anusavice KJ. J Dent Res. 1990;69(12):1791. doi: 10.1177/00220345900690120201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lu H, Stansbury JW, Dickens SH, Eichmiller FC, Bowman CN. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2004;15:1097. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046391.07274.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Langhorst SE, O’Donnell JNR, Skrtic D. Dent Mater. 2009;25:884. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Teranaka T, Kolourides T. Caries Res. 1987;21:326. doi: 10.1159/000261035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chow LC, Takagi S, Tung W, Jordan TH. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1991;96:203. doi: 10.6028/jres.096.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Davis CH, O’Donnell JNR, Sun J, Skrtic D. In: Resin Composites: Properties, Production and Applications. Song DB, editor. Nova Science Publishers; USA: 2011. p. 55. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bodrumlu E, Tunga U. J Contemp Dent Practice. 2006;7(4):045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Simon CG, Jr, Antonucci JM, Liu DW, Skrtic D. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2005;20:279. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Snedecor GE, Cochran GW. Statistical Methods. 8. Iowa State Univ; Press, USA: 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 2. John Wiley & Sons; USA: 1984. p. 209. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Neter G, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4. WCB/McGraw-HilI; USA: 1996. p. 683. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wilson AD, Nicholson JW. Their Biomedical and Industrial Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press; USA: 1993. Chemistry of Solid State Materials. 3. Acid-base Cements; p. 56. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lee SY, Regnault WF, Antonucci JM, Skrtic D. J Biomed Mater Res: Part B. 2007;80B:11. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Skrtic D, Antonucci JM. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2881. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.O’Donnell JNR, Skrtic D. J Biomim Biomater Tissue Engn. 2009;4:1. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBTE.4.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Brit Dent J. 1994;176:91. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Huang C, Tay FR, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Wei SHY, Pashley DH. J Dent. 2002;30:11. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00053-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chatterjee K, Lin-Gibson S, Wallace WE, Parekh SH, Lee YJ, Cicerone MT, Young MF, Simon CG. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5051. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Durner J, Walther UI, Zaspel J, Hickel R, Reichl FX. Biomaterials. 2010;31:818. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Floyd CJE, Dickens SH. Dental Mater. 2006;22:1143. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]














