Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chin Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;6(6):58. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.12.04

Inherited Pancreatic Cancer

Fei Chen 1, Nicholas J Roberts 2,3, Alison P Klein 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC5873957  NIHMSID: NIHMS939246  PMID: 29307198

Abstract

Pancreatic cancers arise through a series of genetic events both inherited and acquired. Inherited genetic changes, both high penetrance and low penetrance, are an important component of pancreatic cancer risk, and may be used to characterize populations who will benefit from early detection. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer patients with inherited mutations may be particularly sensitive to certain targeted agents, providing an opportunity to personalized treatment. Family history of pancreatic cancer is one of the strongest risk factors for the disease, and is associated with an increased risk of caners at other sites, including but not limited to breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer. The goal of this chapter is to discuss the importance of family history of pancreatic cancer, and the known genes that account for a portion of the familial clustering of pancreatic cancer.

Family History and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

Family history is a long-recognized risk factor for pancreatic cancer and an important predictor of disease risk. Studies have suggested that approximately 5-10% of pancreatic cancer patients report a close relative with pancreatic cancer1,2. Most epidemiological studies have demonstrated a 2- to 3-fold increase in risk of pancreatic cancer among individual with affected first-degree relatives (FDRs)312. However, some studies have shown even higher risk. A Swedish study reported a standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for pancreatic cancer of 1.73 [95%CI: 1.13-2.54] in offspring with at least one parent presented with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)13. In a prospective study from the National Familial Pancreas Tumour Registry (NFPTR), the SIRs for pancreatic cancer in comparison to the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) rates were 6.4 [95% CI: 1.8-16.4] and 32.0 [95% CI: 10.2-74.7] in individuals with two and three FDRs with pancreatic cancer14.

Familial clustering was considered the first evidence supporting the genetic predisposition to pancreatic cancer. Reports of multiple siblings in one generation and individuals in three consecutive generations affected by pancreatic cancer are strong evidence of a hereditary form of the disease following the Mendelian inheritance1519. This was later supported by segregation analyses, which favored a major gene model that was predicted to follow an autosomal dominant patterns of a rare allele20. As demonstrated in the observational epidemiologic studies, individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer are at an increased risk of developing the disease themselves. In addition, a population-based twin study in Europe has estimated the heritability for pancreatic cancer to be 36% [95% CI: 0-53%]21. As more evidence of the genetic basis of pancreatic cancer has emerged, an operational definition of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) was proposed to facilitate investigations of the inherited components of the disease. FPC is defined as kindreds with at least a pair of FDRs diagnosed with PDAC. Comparing to the general population, FPC kindred members have a 7- to 9-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer14,22. Risk is even higher among members of FPC kindreds with a young-onset case (< 50 years; SIR = 9.31 [95% CI: 3.42-20.28]) than those without (SIR = 6.34 [95% CI: 4.02-9.51])22.

Both prospective and retrospective studies have found increased risks of other cancers in relatives of pancreatic cancer patients, particularly breast cancer23,24, melanoma24, ovarian25, and colorectal cancer24,26. Study from NFPTR reported an increased risk of dying from cancer of the breast (weighted standardized mortality ratio (wSMR) = 1.66 [95%CI: 1.15-2.34]), ovarian (wSMR=2.05 [95%CI: 1.10-3.49]), bile duct (wSMR = 2.89 [95%CI: 1.04-6.39] and bladder (wSMR = 1.90 [95%CI: 1.00-3.30]) in FDRs of FPC probands27. Elevated mortality of colon cancer (wSMR = 2.31 [1.30-3.81]) and prostate cancer (wSMR = 2.31 [1.14-4.20]) were also observed among the relatives of young-onset (< 50 years old) pancreatic cancer probands27. These findings suggest a shared genetic etiology between pancreatic cancer and several other cancers, and the potential benefits of surveillance at-risk relatives for cancers with established screening guidelines.

Pancreatic Cancer Genes

Pancreatic cancer is more prevalent in families with several hereditary syndromes, for which the predisposing genes have been identified, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), STK11 associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), CDKN2A/p16 associated with familial atypical mole and multiple melanoma (FAMMM), mismatch repair (MMR) genes associated with Lynch syndrome, and PRSS1 associated with hereditary pancreatitis (HP). These genetic syndromes are reported to be associated with a substantially higher risk of pancreatic cancer. The recent discovery of germline mutations in PALB2 and ATM gene in FPC kindreds has extended the list of established high- and moderate-risk pancreatic cancer genes (Table 1).

Table 1.

Pancreatic Cancer Predisposing Genes

Genes Predisposition Syndromes Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
BRCA2 Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer SIR = 2.20 – 5.90
BRCA1 SIR = 1.60 – 4.73
PALB2 Familial breast cancer Increased
ATM Increased
STK11 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome SIR = 76.2 – 139.7
PRSS1 Hereditary Pancreatitis SIR = 53 – 87
CDKN2A Familial atypical multiple mole and melanoma syndrome SIR = 14.8 – 80.8
Mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MHS6 and PMS2) Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer No effect up to SIR = 10.68

SIR = standardized incidence ratio

BRCA1/2

BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene are well-known high-penetrant predisposing genes for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC). These genes are involved in the DNA damage response and DNA double-strand breaks repair. Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cancer associated with BRCA1/2 mutations, though the penetrance at age 70 is much lower2831. The prevalence of BRCA2 mutations in pancreatic cancer patients is 1.4-8.2% for patients unselected for family history3236, about 6-16% among FPC patients3742, and up to 17.2% in families with 3 or more pancreatic cancers38,41,43. Comparing to the general population, the risk of pancreatic cancer is about 2-6 fold in BRCA2 carriers28,44 and 2-5 fold in BRCA1 carriers 29,30,44. Several studies had reported a higher risk of pancreatic cancer in BRCA2 carriers than in BRCA1 carriers28,31,4446. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are at particularly high risk (SIR = 4-10) for early onset pancreatic cancer2830,44. FDRs of BRCA1/2 carriers, regardless of their carrier status, have a significantly higher risk of pancreatic cancer than the general population44,46.

PALB2

PALB2 gene is a tumor suppressor that interacts closely with both BRCA1 and BRCA2 during double-strand DNA repair. Mutations of PALB2 had previously been associated with familial breast cancer47. Jones et al. first reported the discovery of truncating mutations of PALB2 gene in four FPC probands from the NFPTR 48. Since then, pathogenic mutations of PALB2 gene have been found in 0.4-4% FPC families, majority of which were families with history of both pancreatic cancer and breast/ovarian cancer4955.

ATM

ATM is a breast cancer susceptibility gene that coordinates the DNA double-strand breaks repair. Deleterious mutations of ATM gene were first reported by Roberts and his colleagues in two FPC families with at least three members affected by pancreatic cancer56. In the subsequent analysis, four additional ATM mutations were found in 166 FPC patients compared to none in 190 spouse controls56. To date, ATM mutations are found in 1-5% patients with pancreatic cancer35,36,42,5759.

STK11

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is caused by germline mutations in the STK11 gene6062. PJS patients are at very high risk of developing cancer during their lifetimes, particularly gastrointestinal cancer and gynecological cancer. The cumulative risk of developing any gastrointestinal cancer is 38-66% at age 7063. Compared to the general population, PJS patients have a 76-140 fold elevated risk for pancreatic cancer6466. The cumulative risk of developing pancreatic cancer at age 70 in PJS patients is 11-55%6467.

CDKN2A

CDKN2A is a tumor suppressor gene that is considered a major cause of familial melanoma. In melanoma-prone families of European ancestry, pancreatic cancer is the second most common type of cancers associated with CDKN2A mutations. Longitudinal studies in these families have found a 15- to 80-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer in carriers of CDKN2A mutations comparing to the general population6873. The risk of developing pancreatic cancer is also higher in FDRs of carriers than in FDRs of non-carriers (RR = 7.4 [95%CI: 2.3-18.7])74.

Mismatch repair genes

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch Syndrome, accounts for 2-5% of all colorectal cancer. It is caused by inactivating mutations of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. While several studies found no increase in risk of pancreatic cancer in Lynch Syndrome patients7578, others reported an approximately 7- to 10-fold elevated risk of developing pancreatic cancer in carriers of MMR gene mutations7982. The relative risk of pancreatic cancer is higher at younger age79,80. The cumulative risk of developing pancreatic cancer at age 70 among mutation carriers was estimated to be 3.68% [95% CI: 1.45% - 5.88%] 80.

PRSS1

Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis in childhood and frequent progression to chronic pancreatitis. Germline mutations in PRSS1 are responsible for the majority of HP cases. Comparing to the general population, the risk of pancreatic cancer is about 69-fold higher in HP patients, and the median age of cancer onset was at least 15 years earlier 8386. About 20-50% HP patients would develop pancreatic cancer at age 708385,87. The risk is even higher among smokers with HP who tend to develop pancreatic cancer 20 years before non-smokers85,88.

Germline Mutations in Sporadic Cases

Inherited genetic alterations are not restricted to patients with FDRs affected by pancreatic cancer. While current guidelines recommend germline genetic testing for pancreatic cancer patients with an first degree relative with pancreatic cancer or pancreatic cancer patients with a family history indicative of one of the above mentioned genetic syndromes, patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic cancer may also harbor mutation in a pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes. In fact, the discovery of the role of BRCA2 in pancreatic cancer was bases upon the observation of Three germline mutations in BRCA2 was found in 41 (7.3%) sporadic pancreatic cancer patients32. Subsequent studies have show that in a series of 306 unselected PDAC patients, 14 carried mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 while only 2 of the 14 had a family history of PDAC33. Salo-Mullen et al. reported a 7.4% prevalence of BRCA mutations in 27 PDAC patients of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry without a family history of breast, ovarian or pancreatic cancer34. Studies have reported 0-3% sporadic or unselected pancreatic cancer patients carrying PALB2 mutations, leading to an aggregated prevalence of 0.75%55. Recently, evaluation of 854 pancreatic cancer patients, twelve of them had germline BRCA2 mutations, ten with ATM, three with BRCA1, and two with PALB236. Larger scale studies are currently underway to evaluate the mutation prevalence in apparently sporadic pancreatic cancer and expanding genetic testing beyond the current guidelines.

Targeted Therapy

Understanding genetic predisposition of pancreatic cancer has important implication for the development and translation of targeted therapies. Tumors with mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, and ATM are highly sensitive to DNA-damaging related treatments such as crosslinking agents8991 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi)9295. Preclinical studies have demonstrated improved sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents and ionizing radiation in pancreatic cancer cells treated by these agents9698. The clinical benefits of using crosslinking agents and PARPi in patients with pancreatic cancer are currently being investigated. Preliminary results have shown promising efficacy of these agents, particularly in patients with BRCA2-associated pancreatic cancer99102.

Common Low-Risk Susceptibility Loci

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) allow for the unbiased evaluation of common genomic variants associated with pancreatic cancer. To identify common susceptibility variants, five pancreatic cancer GWAS have been conducted by the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan) and the Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium (PanC4) in populations of European ancestry, including PanScan I in 2009103, PanScan II in 2010104, PanScan III in 2014105, PanC4 in 2015106 and a recent imputation analysis of GWAS data from PanScan I–III107. A total of 16 pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci located in 13 genomic regions have been discovered in European populations (Table 2).

Table 2.

Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Pancreatic Cancer Identified in European Populations

Chr Nearest Gene(s) Top SNP Minor/Major Alleles Consequence Type Allelic OR [95% CI] § P-value
1q32.1 NR5A2 rs3790844 T/C intron 0.77 [0.71–0.84] 2.45×10−10
1q32.1 NR5A2 rs2816938 A/T upstream 1.20 [1.15–1.25] 4.88×10−15
2p13.3 ETAA1 rs1486134 G/T downstream 1.14 [1.09–1.19] 3.36×10−9
3q29 TP63 rs9854771 A/G intron 0.89 [0.85–0.93] 2.35×10−8
5q15.33 TERT, CLPTM1L rs401681 C/T intron 1.19 [1.11–1.27] 3.66×10−7
5p15.33 TERT, CLPTM1L rs2736098 T/C synonymous 0.80 [0.76–0.85] 9.78×10−14
5p15.33 TERT, CLPTM1L rs35226131 T/C upstream 0.71 [0.63–0.80] 1.70×10−8
7p13 SUGCT rs17688601 A/C intron 0.88 [0.84–0.92] 1.41×10−8
7q32.3 LINC-PINT rs6971499 C/T intron 0.79 [0.74–0.84] 2.98×10−12
8q24.21 MYC rs10094872 T/A intron 1.15 [1.10–1.20] 3.22×10−9
9q34 ABO rs505922 T/C intron 1.20 [1.12–1.28] 5.37×10−8
13q12.2 PDX1 rs9581943 A/G upstream 1.15 [1.10–1.20] 2.35×10−9
13q22.1 none rs9543325 T/C intergenic 1.26 [1.18–1.35] 3.27×10−11
16q23.1 BCAR1, CTRB1, CTRB2 rs7190458 A/G synonymous 1.46 [1.30–1.65] 1.13×10−10
17q25.1 LINC00673 rs11655237 T/C non-coding transcript exon 1.26 [1.19–1.34] 1.42×10−14
22q12.1 ZNRF3 rs16986825 T/C intron 1.18 [1.12–1.25] 1.18×10−8

Chromosomal location in NCBI genome build 37.

SNP = single nucleotide polymorphisms

§

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; het = heterozygotes; hom = homozygotes

PanScan I

PanScan I was a two-stage GWAS including 1,896 patients with incidence pancreatic cancer and 1,939 controls in the discovery stage, as well as 2,457 cases and 2,654 controls in the replication stage. The most significant variant (rs505922) on chromosome 9q34.2 was mapped to the first intron of ABO blood group gene 103. The association of ABO loci with pancreatic cancer has been robustly replicated in studies of European105,106,108,109 and Asian populations110112. These findings are consistent with the observation that individuals with blood group O had a lower risk of pancreatic cancer than those with groups A or B. About 17% to 19.5% of all pancreatic cancers in populations of European descent was attributable to the inheritance of a non-O blood group113,114.

PanScan II

From 3,851 pancreatic cancer cases and 3,934 controls, PanScan II identified three novel genomic regions on chromosome 13q22.1 (a large non-genic region), chromosome 1q32.1 (NR5A2) and chromosome 5p15.33 (TERT-CLPTM1L) to be significantly associated with pancreatic cancer104. The locus on chromosome 13q22.1 (rs9543325) was mapped to a large gene desert flanked by the KLF5 and KLF12 genes. Both genes encode a transcription factor involved in cell transformation, proliferation, and carcinogenesis. Several studies have reported the overexpression of the KLF5 gene in pancreatic cancer 115118. The KLF2 gene, on the other hand, was found to be downregulated in PDAC tumor tissues, and its expression may suppress the malignant transformation of PDAC cancer cells through its regulation of beta-catenin/TCF signaling119.

Two variants on chromosome 1q32.1 are associated with pancreatic cancer independently. The first significant variant (rs3790844) identified in PanScan II is located in the first intron of the NR5A2 gene104. Imputation analysis of PanScan I–III detected the second variant in the upstream of NR5A2 (rs2816938). NR5A2 encodes the nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 2, a transcription factor that activates or inhibits transcription of specific target genes. Overexpression of NR5A2 was observed in resected PDAC tumor tissues and was associated with reduced survival time in PDAC patients120. Heterozygous Nr5a2 mice exhibit increased rates of pancreatic acinar to ductal metaplasia and impaired recovery after chemically induced acute pancreatitis121,122. Loss of Nr5a2 accelerates the development of oncogenesis driven by Kras121,122. These findings suggest a tumor suppressor role of NR5A2 that protects the pancreas from KRAS driven pre-neoplastic changes.

Four independent pancreatic cancer risk loci have now been identified in the multi-cancer TERT-CLPTM1L region on chromosome 5p15.33. The first pancreatic cancer risk locus identified in PanScan II is located in the intron 13 of CLPTM1L (rs401681). PanScan III reported a second independent risk locus on chromosome 5p15.33, tagged by a synonymous variant within the second exon of TERT (rs2736098) 105. A third independent risk locus located in the first intron of TERT gene (rs2853677) was discovered through a candidate gene analysis in 5,550 pancreatic cancer cases and 7,585 control subjects from PANDoRA (PANcreatic Disease ReseArch) consortium and PanScan 123. Recently, imputation of PanScan I–III and replication in PANDoRA and PanC4 found a fourth risk locus for pancreatic cancer in this genomic region (rs35226131), which is located about 200bps upstream of the transcriptional start site of TERT 107. The chromosome 5p15.33 region contains two plausible candidate genes: TERT, which encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase reverse transcriptase and CLPTM1L, which encodes the cleft lip and palate-associated transmembrane 1 like protein. TERT is a component of the protein and RNA complex that maintains telomere ends. Mutations in TERT promoter region were frequent in multiple tumor types and were correlated with increased TERT expression and telomerase activation124. Common variants in the TERT region were associated with leukocyte telomere length in patients with breast and ovarian cancer125. A recent study had reported an association between the minor allele of rs401681 and shorter telomere length in pancreatic cancer patients, which was consistent with the observation that telomere shortening occurs as an early event in pancreatic tumorigenesis126128. Overexpression of CLPTM1L gene are observed in lung and pancreatic cancer tissues129131. CLPTM1L protects tumor cells from genotoxic apoptosis and is required for Ras-induced oncogenic transformation129,130,132. It’s also found that overexpression of CLPTM1 may lead to an abrogation of normal cytokinesis and promote cell proliferation in pancreatic cancer cells131.

PanScan III

The PanScan III study population combined 1,582 newly genotyped pancreatic cancer cases and 5,203 control subjects with PanScan I cohort and sought replication in 2,576 cases and 6,662 controls from the PANDoRA consortium. Four new risk loci for pancreatic cancer was identified on chromosome 7q23.2 (LINC-PINT), 16q23.1 (BCAR1), 13q12.2 (PDX1) and 22q12.1 (ZNRF3). The signal on 7q32.3 was marked by an intronic variant (rs6971499) in LINC-PINT, a long intergenic p53-induced non-protein coding RNA located between MKLN1 (Muskelin 1) and KLF14 (Kruppel-like factor 14). Muskelin is an intracellular protein that mediates cell adhesive and cytoskeletal responses to the extracellular matrix133. KLF14 is a member of the Kruppel-like family of transcription factors that may act as a suppressor of KRAS-mediated cell growth through regulation of the cyclin A promoter134. Loss of KLF14 may also trigger centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and spontaneous tumorigenesis135. KLF14 has also been associated with several metabolic phenotypes including type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer136139.

A synonymous variant residing in the last exon of BCAR1 was noted on 16q23.1 (rs7190458). Breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1 (BCAR1), also known as p130Cas is a member of the Cas (Crk-associated substrate) family of adaptor proteins with important regulatory roles in migration, cell cycle control and apoptosis140. Altered expression and activity of p130Cas is known to promote metastasis and drug resistance in multiple cancers140,141. In addition, two chymotrypsinogen gene, CTRB1 and CTRB2 are also located closely to the detected signal. As important members of a family of serine proteases secreted by the pancreas into the gastrointestinal tract142, these two genes are plausible target for susceptibility variants at this locus. The detected signal for pancreatic cancer is also in proximity of a susceptibility locus (rs7202877) for type-I and type-II diabetes143,144 that was found to impair beta-cell function145 and influences expression of CTRB1/2 in pancreas tissues146.

The top ranked variant on chromosome 13q12.2 (rs9581943) is located in the promoter region of the PDX1 (pancreatic and duodenal homeobox1 protein 1) gene. Pathway analysis of GWAS data identified PDX1, along with NR5A2, HNF1A, and HNF4G, as important genes for pancreatic development147. The protein encoded by PDX1 is a transcriptional activator of several genes. It is essential in the early development of pancreas148, and plays a major role in beta-cell function and glucose-dependent regulation of insulin gene expression. Heterozygous mutations in PDX1 resulted in impaired glucose tolerance and symptoms of diabetes as seen in maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 4 (MODY4) and late-onset T2DM149151.

The signal on chromosome 22q2.1 (rs16986825) maps to an intron in ZNRF3 (zinc and ring finger 3), which encodes a cell surface transmembrane E3 uniquitin protein ligase that is a negative regulator of the WNT signaling pathway152. Additionally, a low-penetrance breast cancer gene, CHEK2, is also located in proximity to the detected signal. This gene encodes a cell-cycle checkpoint kinase that cooperates with p53, BRCA1 and ATM and regulates cell division in response to DNA damage153. Germline mutations and variants of CHEK2 had been implicated in susceptibility to several cancer types154158, including familial pancreatic cancer41,42,159.

PanC4

PanC4 was conducted on 9,925 pancreatic cancer cases and 11,569 controls, pooling 4,164 newly genotyped cases and 3,792 controls from nine studies in the PanC4 consortium with PanSan I and II cohorts in the gene discovery stage, and analyzed an independent set of 2,497 cases and 4,611 controls from the PANDoRA consortium in the replication stage. Not only this study replicated all previously identified risk loci for pancreatic cancer in European populations, three novel associated signals were also detected on chromosome 17q25.1 (LINC00673), 7p13 (SUGCT) and 3q29 (TP63)106. Significant association was also found on chromosome 2q13.3 (ETAA1), a region with prior suggestive evidence in the Han Chinese160.

The top variant on 17q25.1 (rs11655237) maps to LINC00673 (long inter-genic non-protein coding RNA 673). This association subsequently replicated in a Han Chinese population (rs11655237, OR = 1.26, P = 3.95×10−14)161. Through its epigenetic regulation of gene expression, LINC00673 may function as an oncogene in several types of cancers. Overexpression of LINC00673 promotes tumor proliferation, invasion and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer 162164 and tongue squamous cell carcinoma165, and was correlated with poor prognosis in breast cancer166. In contrast, expression of LINC00673 was significantly lower in PDAC cancer cells than in normal cells and tissues and overexpression of LINC00673 in the PDAC cell line substantially reduced the rate of cell proliferation. It was found that the single-nucleotide change at rs11655237 creates a miR-1231 binding site, which diminishes the effect of LINC00673 in an allele-specific manner and thus confer susceptibility to pancreatic tumorigenesis 161.

PanC4 reported a significant association on 7p13 with an intronic variant (rs17688601) of the SUGCT (succinyl-CoA:glutarate-CoA transferase) gene. Mutations of this gene cause a benign form of glutaric aciduria (glutaric aciduria type III), a rare metabolic abnormality characterized by persistent isolated accumulation or excretion of glutaric acid 167. The role of this gene in pancreatic cancer risk is unclear.

Two strongly correlated intronic variants of TP63 (tumor protein p63) were found to be associated with pancreatic cancer in PanC4 (top variants rs9864771). Protein encoded by TP63 (p51/p63) is a p53 homologue with pleiotropic functions including cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis, differentiation, senescence, and aging. Frequent overexpression of p63 was observed in resected PDAC tissues168. It was suggested that different isoforms of p63 have opposite effects. While TAp63 induces cell death and cell cycle arrest with tumor suppressor features169, DNp63 as the predominant isoform in pancreatic cancer cell lines, promotes pancreatic cancer growth, motility and invasion170,171. As a tumor suppressor, p63 had reduced anti-oncogenetic effects compared with p53 in human cancer cells172. However, loss of p63 can cooperate with loss of p53, leading to higher tumor burden and metastasis as seen in genetic mice models168,171. It is hypothesized that it is the ratio of TAp63 and DNp63 that determines the biological outcome and chemo-sensitivity.

Imputation Analysis of PanScan I–III

Recently, an imputation analysis of the GWAS data in 5,107 cases and 8,845 controls from PanScan I–III had uncovered three new pancreatic cancer signals on chromosome 1q32.1 (NR5A2), 8q24.21 (MYC), and 5p15.33 (CLPTM1L-TERT), all of which are independent from previously reported susceptibility variants107.

The detected variants on 8q24.21 (rs10094872) is a novel risk loci for pancreatic cancer, independent from the previously reported loci with suggestive evidence in PanScan III (rs1561927). These two variants are both located in the 2 Mb region known to contain multiple susceptibility loci that influence risk of bladder, breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and renal cancer173177. MYC (MYC proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor) is the gene located in the closest proximity to the detected variant. Oncogene MYC is a transcription factor that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of one-third of all human malignancies, and may play an important role in KRAS-driven neoplastic transformation in the pancreas178. MYC overexpression occurs in up to 42% of advanced PDAC179,180. Activation of MYC in adult mice has led to the development of ductal adenocarcinomas with metastasis to the liver181. Although evidence have suggested regulatory roles of the 8q24.21 risk loci in the expression of MYC, functional analysis are warranted to allow a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanism178.

GWAS in Asian Populations

Two GWAS have been conducted in populations of Asian descent (Table 3). The Japanese pancreatic cancer study of 991 cases and 5,209 controls found suggestive associations on chromosome 6q25.3 (FOXQ1), 12p11.21 (BICD1) and 7q36.2 (DPP6) 182. The second GWAS in a Chinese population of 3,584 pancreatic cancer cases and 4,868 controls (ChinaPC) identified five susceptibility loci on chromosome 21q21.3 (BACH1), 21q22.3 (TFF1), 10q26.11 (PRLHR), 22q13.32 (FAM19A5), and 5p13.1 (DAB2)160. The most significant association identified in ChinaPC was for rs372883, a variant located in the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of BACH1 (BTB domain and CNC homolog 1) gene on chromosome 21q21.3. BACH1 is a transcription factor that belongs to the cap ‘n’ collar type of basic region leucine zipper factor family (CNC-bZip). Recent studies have demonstrated a critical role of BACH1 in cell migration and metastasis through its regulation of metastasis-related gene expression in breast, colon and prostate cancer 183185. The second significant association was detected on chromosome 21q22.3 (rs1547374). This region harbors the trefoil family protein 1 (TFF1) gene that encodes secretory proteins expression in gastrointestinal mucosa. Upregulated expression of TFF1 in precursor lesions of PDAC, including pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MSNs), suggests its potential involvement at the early stage of pancreatic carcinogenesis 186188. Recent studies found that reduced expression of TFF1 in the invasion front of human PDAC was associated with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in patients with PDAC189. In pancreatic cancers, expression of TFF1 promotes tumorigenesis by suppressing oncogene-induced senescence 190 and is correlated with increase metastasis191. An intronic variant (rs2255280) in DAB2 (clathrin adaptor protein) gene region on 5p13.1 was among the identified susceptibility loci in ChinaPC. Frequent loss expression of DAB2 in human malignant cancer cells suggests its potential role as a tumor suppressor192. Overexpression of DAB2 inhibits cell growth, migration and invasion, and was correlated with poor survival in cancer patients193196. Significant association on 10q26.11 was observed for a regulatory variant of PRLHR (prolactin releasing hormone receptor) gene (rs12413624). Polymorphisms of this gene was associated with colorectal cancer197. A intronic variant of FAM19A5 (family with sequence similarity 19 member A5) gene on 22q13.32 was also associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (rs5768709). This gene encodes a TAFA protein expressed predominately in brain and may function as brain-specific chemokines or neurokines198. Prior to the ChinaPC study, there is no implication of PRLHR or FAM19A5 in the risk of pancreatic cancer and thus their susceptibility role is currently unknown.

Table 3.

Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Pancreatic Cancer Identified in Asian Populations

Chr Nearest Gene(s) Top SNP Minor/Major Alleles Consequence Type Allelic OR [95% CI] § P-value
5p13.1 DAB2 rs2255280 C/A intron 0.81 [0.76–0.87] 4.18×10−10
10q26.11 RPLHR rs12413624 T/A regulatory region 1.23 [1.16–1.31] 5.12×10−11
21q21.3 BACH1 rs372883 C/T 3′ UTR 0.79 [0.75–0.84] 2.24×10−13
21q22.3 TFF1 rs1547374 G/A downstream 0.79 [0.74–0.84] 3.71×10−13
22q13.32 FAM19A5 rs5768709 G/A intron 1.25 [1.17–1.34] 1.41×10−10

Chromosomal location in NCBI genome build 37.

SNP = single nucleotide polymorphisms

§

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; het = heterozygotes; hom = homozygotes

Current Status of Screening High-Risk Populations

Screening and early detection of pancreatic cancer offer the best chance of reducing the high mortality rates of this disease. The goal of screening asymptomatic individuals is to identify pancreatic cancer at early stage or, ideally to identify high-grade precancerous lesions that can be resected to prevent the development of cancer. Because of the low incidence of pancreatic cancer in the general population, population level screening will demand a highly specific screening assay. Selective screening of individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer is considered worthwhile. The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium recommends screening on FDRs of FPC patients, patients with PJS, and carriers of CDKN2A/p16, BRCA2, and carriers of MMR gene mutations with ≥1 affected FDR199 . FDRs of FPC patients represent a group of high-risk individuals that are relatively easy to identify in clinical settings. Of all identified risk factors for pancreatic cancer, PJS confers the greatest risk for the disease, making PJS patients good candidates for pancreatic cancer screening. Among the established pancreatic cancer genes, germline BRCA2 mutations followed by ATM account for the highest percentage of inherited pancreatic cancer36,42,58,40,34. It is recommended that BRCA2 mutation carriers with ≥1 affected FDR and those with two or more affected family members should be considered for screening, particularly Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. In addition, given the substantially higher risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with CDKN2A/p16 and mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations, screening is also recommended to those mutation carriers with >1 affected FDRs199.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are recommended by CAPS as initial screening tools. However, the CAPS Consortium could not reach consensus on ages to initiate or stop surveillance, the interval for follow-up imaging, nor on the long-term management of initial abnormal results199. Screening and early detection strategies should be accompanied by effective treatment or preventive strategies if they are to produce a significant survival benefit. Given morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic surgery, there is little consensus about when surgery is required for pancreatic lesion in asymptomatic high-risk individuals199. Multidisciplinary assessment is however recommended to make individualized decision of the necessity of surgical intervention. The lack of consensus on many aspects of pancreatic cancer screening underscores the need for more research to fill the knowledge gap and to make evidence-based decisions.

Summary and Future Directions

Pancreatic cancer is rare and deadly disease with the highest case-fatality rate of any major cancer. Due to the lack of effective means for prevention, diagnosis and treatment, pancreatic cancer remains a major public health challenge. Family history, cigarette smoking, chronic pancreatitis, and diabetes are well-established risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer is fundamentally a genetic disease caused by both inherited and acquired genetic mutations. Family-based heritability analysis reported 36% of pancreatic cancer was due to genetics. Familial pancreatic cancer kindreds and patients affected by certain genetic syndromes, for example HP, PJS, HBOC, FAMMM, and HNPCC, are at particularly high risk of pancreatic cancer. About 15-20% of FPC are caused by germline mutations in one of the established pancreatic cancer gene (BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, PRSS1, STK11, BRCA1, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). The genetic basis of susceptibility underlying the majority of FPC cases, however, remains unexplained. To date, GWAS of pancreatic cancer have discovered 16 low-risk susceptibility loci in European populations and 5 in Asian populations, many of which had strong biological plausibility. Together, these GWAS loci explained < 5% of pancreatic cancer. Screening, surveillance and management guidelines for genetically high-risk individuals are currently evolving. DNA-damaging related agents are promising in treating pancreatic cancer caused by mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 or ATM genes. Identification of disease-causing genes can aid in the characterization of individuals at highest genetically defined risk in which effective prevention approach can be developed.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported the NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence P50-CA062924, NIH grants R00-CA190889 and R01-CA154823 and the Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research and the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center and the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund Maryland: Genetics, Epidemiology and Medicine Training Grant

Footnotes

No conflicts of interest

References

  • 1.Hruban RH, Petersen GM, Ha PK, Kern SE. Genetics of pancreatic cancer. From genes to families. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1998 Jan;7(1):1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klein AP. Identifying people at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 Jan;13(1):66. doi: 10.1038/nrc3420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fernandez E, La Vecchia C, D’Avanzo B, Negri E, Franceschi S. Family history and the risk of liver, gallbladder, and pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 1994 May;3(3):209–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Silverman DT, Schiffman M, Everhart J, Goldstein A, Lillemoe KD, Swanson GM, et al. Diabetes mellitus, other medical conditions and familial history of cancer as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999 Aug;80(11):1830–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schenk M, Schwartz AG, O’Neal E, Kinnard M, Greenson JK, Fryzek JP, et al. Familial risk of pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Apr 18;93(8):640–4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.8.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fehringer G, Gallinger S, Borgida A, Zhang LR, Adams L, Liu G, et al. The association of family history of cancer and medical history with pancreatic cancer risk. Pancreas. 2014 Jul;43(5):812–4. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schulte A, Pandeya N, Fawcett J, Fritschi L, Klein K, Risch HA, et al. Association between family cancer history and risk of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;45:145–50. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zheng Z, Zheng R, He Y, Sun X, Wang N, Chen T, et al. Risk Factors for Pancreatic Cancer in China: A Multicenter Case-Control Study. J Epidemiol. 2016;26(2):64–70. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jacobs EJ, Rodriguez C, Newton CC, Bain EB, Patel AV, Feigelson HS, et al. Family history of various cancers and pancreatic cancer mortality in a large cohort. Cancer Causes Control CCC. 2009 Oct;20(8):1261–9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9339-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Permuth-Wey J, Egan KM. Family history is a significant risk factor for pancreatic cancer: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Cancer. 2009;8(2):109–17. doi: 10.1007/s10689-008-9214-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jacobs EJ, Chanock SJ, Fuchs CS, Lacroix A, McWilliams RR, Steplowski E, et al. Family history of cancer and risk of pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan) Int J Cancer J Int Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;127(6):1421–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Austin MA, Kuo E, Van Den Eeden SK, Mandelson MT, Brentnall TA, Kamineni A, et al. Family history of diabetes and pancreatic cancer as risk factors for pancreatic cancer: the PACIFIC study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2013 Oct;22(10):1913–7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hemminki K, Li X. Familial and second primary pancreatic cancers: a nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2003 Feb 10;103(4):525–30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klein AP, Brune KA, Petersen GM, Goggins M, Tersmette AC, Offerhaus GJA, et al. Prospective risk of pancreatic cancer in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds. Cancer Res. 2004 Apr 1;64(7):2634–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dat NM, Sontag SJ. Pancreatic carcinoma in brothers. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Aug;97(2):282. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-2-282_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghadirian P, Simard A, Baillargeon J. Cancer of the pancreas in two brothers and one sister. Int J Pancreatol Off J Int Assoc Pancreatol. 1987 Dec;2(5–6):383–91. doi: 10.1007/BF02788437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.MacDermott RP, Kramer P. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in four siblings. Gastroenterology. 1973 Jul;65(1):137–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Friedman JM, Fialkow PJ. Familial carcinoma of the pancreas. Clin Genet. 1976 May;9(5):463–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1976.tb01598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ehrenthal D, Haeger L, Griffin T, Compton C. Familial pancreatic adenocarcinoma in three generations. A case report and a review of the literature. Cancer. 1987 May 1;59(9):1661–4. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870501)59:9<1661::aid-cncr2820590923>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klein AP, Beaty TH, Bailey-Wilson JE, Brune KA, Hruban RH, Petersen GM. Evidence for a major gene influencing risk of pancreatic cancer. Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;23(2):133–49. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer–analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):78–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brune KA, Lau B, Palmisano E, Canto M, Goggins MG, Hruban RH, et al. Importance of age of onset in pancreatic cancer kindreds. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jan 20;102(2):119–26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bermejo JL, Hemminki K. Familial association of histology specific breast cancers with cancers at other sites. Int J Cancer. 2004 Apr 10;109(3):430–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hiripi E, Bermejo JL, Li X, Sundquist J, Hemminki K. Familial association of pancreatic cancer with other malignancies in Swedish families. Br J Cancer. 2009 Nov;101(10):1792. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cote ML, Schenk M, Schwartz AG, Vigneau FD, Kinnard M, Greenson JK, et al. Risk of other cancers in individuals with a family history of pancreas cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2007;38(2–4):119–26. doi: 10.1007/s12029-008-9022-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hemminki K, Li X. Familial liver and gall bladder cancer: a nationwide epidemiological study from Sweden. Gut. 2003 Apr;52(4):592–6. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.4.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang L, Brune KA, Visvanathan K, Laheru D, Herman J, Wolfgang C, et al. Elevated Cancer Mortality in the Relatives of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. 2009 Nov 1;18(11):2829–34. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thompson D, Easton DF, Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Sep 18;94(18):1358–65. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Aug 4;91(15):1310–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.van Asperen CJ, Brohet RM, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Hoogerbrugge N, Verhoef S, Vasen HFA, et al. Cancer risks in BRCA2 families: estimates for sites other than breast and ovary. J Med Genet. 2005 Sep;42(9):711–9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.028829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DEC, Rosen B, Bradley L, Fan I, et al. Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Dec 6;98(23):1694–706. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goggins M, Schutte M, Lu J, Moskaluk CA, Weinstein CL, Petersen GM, et al. Germline BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1996 Dec 1;56(23):5360–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Holter S, Borgida A, Dodd A, Grant R, Semotiuk K, Hedley D, et al. Germline BRCA Mutations in a Large Clinic-Based Cohort of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3124–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Salo-Mullen EE, O’Reilly EM, Kelsen DP, Ashraf AM, Lowery MA, Yu KH, et al. Identification of germline genetic mutations in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 2015 Dec 15;121(24):4382–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hu C, Hart SN, Bamlet WR, Moore RM, Nandakumar K, Eckloff BW, et al. Prevalence of Pathogenic Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes among Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2016 Jan;25(1):207–11. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shindo K, Yu J, Suenaga M, Fesharakizadeh S, Cho C, Macgregor-Das A, et al. Deleterious Germline Mutations in Patients With Apparently Sporadic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 20;35(30):3382–90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hahn SA, Greenhalf B, Ellis I, Sina-Frey M, Rieder H, Korte B, et al. BRCA2 germline mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 5;95(3):214–21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.3.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Couch FJ, Johnson MR, Rabe KG, Brune K, de Andrade M, Goggins M, et al. The prevalence of BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2007 Feb;16(2):342–6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Slater EP, Langer P, Fendrich V, Habbe N, Chaloupka B, Matthäi E, et al. Prevalence of BRCA2 and CDKN2a mutations in German familial pancreatic cancer families. Fam Cancer. 2010 Sep;9(3):335–43. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9329-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhen DB, Rabe KG, Gallinger S, Syngal S, Schwartz AG, Goggins MG, et al. BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and CDKN2A mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: a PACGENE study. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2015 Jul;17(7):569–77. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Catts ZA-K, Baig MK, Milewski B, Keywan C, Guarino M, Petrelli N. Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729–35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chaffee KG, Oberg AL, McWilliams RR, Majithia N, Allen BA, Kidd J, et al. Prevalence of germ-line mutations in cancer genes among pancreatic cancer patients with a positive family history. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2017 Jul 20; doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Murphy KM, Brune KA, Griffin C, Sollenberger JE, Petersen GM, Bansal R, et al. Evaluation of candidate genes MAP2K4, MADH4, ACVR1B, and BRCA2 in familial pancreatic cancer: deleterious BRCA2 mutations in 17% Cancer Res. 2002 Jul 1;62(13):3789–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mocci E, Milne RL, Méndez-Villamil EY, Hopper JL, John EM, Andrulis IL, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in breast cancer families from the breast cancer family registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2013 May;22(5):803–11. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mersch J, Jackson MA, Park M, Nebgen D, Peterson SK, Singletary C, et al. Cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations other than breast and ovarian. Cancer. 2015 Jan 15;121(2):269–75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Streff H, Profato J, Ye Y, Nebgen D, Peterson SK, Singletary C, et al. Cancer Incidence in First- and Second-Degree Relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. The Oncologist. 2016 Jul;21(7):869–74. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rahman N, Seal S, Thompson D, Kelly P, Renwick A, Elliott A, et al. PALB2 which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):165–7. doi: 10.1038/ng1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jones S, Hruban RH, Kamiyama M, Borges M, Zhang X, Parsons DW, et al. Exomic sequencing identifies PALB2 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):217. doi: 10.1126/science.1171202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tischkowitz MD, Sabbaghian N, Hamel N, Borgida A, Rosner C, Taherian N, et al. Analysis of the gene coding for the BRCA2-interacting protein PALB2 in familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009 Sep;137(3):1183–6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Slater EP, Langer P, Niemczyk E, Strauch K, Butler J, Habbe N, et al. PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families. Clin Genet. 2010 Nov;78(5):490–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hofstatter EW, Domchek SM, Miron A, Garber J, Wang M, Componeschi K, et al. PALB2 mutations in familial breast and pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer. 2011 Jun;10(2):225–31. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9426-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Peterlongo P, Catucci I, Pasquini G, Verderio P, Peissel B, Barile M, et al. PALB2 germline mutations in familial breast cancer cases with personal and family history of pancreatic cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(3):825–8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1305-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stadler ZK, Salo-Mullen E, Sabbaghian N, Simon JA, Zhang L, Olson SH, et al. Germline PALB2 mutation analysis in breast-pancreas cancer families. J Med Genet. 2011 Aug;48(8):523–5. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.087379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ghiorzo P, Pensotti V, Fornarini G, Sciallero S, Battistuzzi L, Belli F, et al. Contribution of germline mutations in the BRCA and PALB2 genes to pancreatic cancer in Italy. Fam Cancer. 2012 Mar;11(1):41–7. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9483-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Borecka M, Zemankova P, Vocka M, Soucek P, Soukupova J, Kleiblova P, et al. Mutation analysis of the P ALB2 gene in unselected pancreatic cancer patients in the Czech Republic. Cancer Genet. 2016 May;209(5):199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Roberts NJ, Jiao Y, Yu J, Kopelovich L, Petersen GM, Bondy ML, et al. ATM mutations in patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2012 Jan;2(1):41–6. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Grant RC, Selander I, Connor AA, Selvarajah S, Borgida A, Briollais L, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2015 Mar;148(3):556–64. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Takai E, Yachida S, Shimizu K, Furuse J, Kubo E, Ohmoto A, et al. Germline mutations in Japanese familial pancreatic cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 8;7(45):74227–35. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Roberts NJ, Norris AL, Petersen GM, Bondy ML, Brand R, Gallinger S, et al. Whole genome sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2015 Dec 9; doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hemminki A, Tomlinson I, Markie D, Järvinen H, Sistonen P, Björkqvist AM, et al. Localization of a susceptibility locus for Peutz-Jeghers syndrome to 19p using comparative genomic hybridization and targeted linkage analysis. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan;15(1):87–90. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hemminki A, Markie D, Tomlinson I, Avizienyte E, Roth S, Loukola A, et al. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature. 1998 Jan 8;391(6663):184–7. doi: 10.1038/34432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jenne DE, Reimann H, Nezu J, Friedel W, Loff S, Jeschke R, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel serine threonine kinase. Nat Genet. 1998 Jan;18(1):38–43. doi: 10.1038/ng0198-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.van Lier MGF, Wagner A, Mathus-Vliegen EMH, Kuipers EJ, Steyerberg EW, van Leerdam ME. High cancer risk in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and surveillance recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1258–1264. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.725. author reply 1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Tersmette AC, Goodman SN, Petersen GM, Booker SV, et al. Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000 Dec;119(6):1447–53. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.20228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Korsse SE, Harinck F, van Lier MGF, Biermann K, Offerhaus GJA, Krak N, et al. Pancreatic cancer risk in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome patients: a large cohort study and implications for surveillance. J Med Genet. 2013 Jan;50(1):59–64. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Resta N, Pierannunzio D, Lenato GM, Stella A, Capocaccia R, Bagnulo R, et al. Cancer risk associated with STK11/LKB1 germline mutations in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome patients: results of an Italian multicenter study. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver. 2013 Jul;45(7):606–11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hearle N, Schumacher V, Menko FH, Olschwang S, Boardman LA, Gille JJP, et al. Frequency and spectrum of cancers in the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2006 May 15;12(10):3209–15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goldstein AM, Fraser MC, Struewing JP, Hussussian CJ, Ranade K, Zametkin DP, et al. Increased risk of pancreatic cancer in melanoma-prone kindreds with p16I NK4 mutations. N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 12;333(15):970–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510123331504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ghiorzo P, Ciotti P, Mantelli M, Heouaine A, Queirolo P, Rainero ML, et al. Characterization of ligurian melanoma families and risk of occurrence of other neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 1999 Nov 12;83(4):441–8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991112)83:4<441::aid-ijc2>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Borg A, Sandberg T, Nilsson K, Johannsson O, Klinker M, Måsbäck A, et al. High frequency of multiple melanomas and breast and pancreas carcinomas in CDKN2A mutation-positive melanoma families. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Aug 2;92(15):1260–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Goldstein AM, Struewing JP, Fraser MC, Smith MW, Tucker MA. Prospective risk of cancer in CDKN2A germline mutation carriers. J Med Genet. 2004 Jun;41(6):421–4. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.019349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.de Snoo FA, Bishop DT, Bergman W, van Leeuwen I, van der Drift C, van Nieuwpoort FA, et al. Increased risk of cancer other than melanoma in CDKN2A founder mutation (p16-Leiden)-positive melanoma families. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 1;14(21):7151–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Potjer TP, Kranenburg HE, Bergman W, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Monsjou HS, Barge-Schaapveld DQCM, et al. Prospective risk of cancer and the influence of tobacco use in carriers of the p16-Leiden germline variant. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG. 2015 May;23(5):711–4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mukherjee B, Delancey JO, Raskin L, Everett J, Jeter J, Begg CB, et al. Risk of non-melanoma cancers in first-degree relatives of CDKN2A mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jun 20;104(12):953–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Watson P, Lynch HT. Extracolonic cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1993 Feb 1;71(3):677–85. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3<677::aid-cncr2820710305>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Aarnio M, Sankila R, Pukkala E, Salovaara R, Aaltonen LA, de la Chapelle A, et al. Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. Int J Cancer. 1999 Apr 12;81(2):214–8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990412)81:2<214::aid-ijc8>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pande M, Wei C, Chen J, Amos CI, Lynch PM, Lu KH, et al. Cancer spectrum in DNA mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: results from a hospital based Lynch syndrome registry. Fam Cancer. 2012 Sep;11(3):441–7. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9534-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Samadder NJ, Smith KR, Wong J, Thomas A, Hanson H, Boucher K, et al. Cancer Risk in Families Fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria for Lynch Syndrome. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Aug 3; doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Geary J, Sasieni P, Houlston R, Izatt L, Eeles R, Payne SJ, et al. Gene-related cancer spectrum in families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) Fam Cancer. 2008;7(2):163–72. doi: 10.1007/s10689-007-9164-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kastrinos F, Mukherjee B, Tayob N, Wang F, Sparr J, Raymond VM, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome. JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1790–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Win AK, Young JP, Lindor NM, Tucker KM, Ahnen DJ, Young GP, et al. Colorectal and other cancer risks for carriers and noncarriers from families with a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):958–64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Møller P, Seppälä TT, Bernstein I, Holinski-Feder E, Sala P, Gareth Evans D, et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2017 Jul 28; doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, DiMagno EP, Elitsur Y, Gates LK, Perrault J, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Hereditary Pancreatitis Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Mar 19;89(6):442–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.6.442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Howes N, Lerch MM, Greenhalf W, Stocken DD, Ellis I, Simon P, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of hereditary pancreatitis in Europe. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2004 Mar;2(3):252–61. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rebours V, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Schnee M, Férec C, Maire F, Hammel P, et al. Risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with hereditary pancreatitis: a national exhaustive series. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;103(1):111–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Raimondi S, Lowenfels AB, Morselli-Labate AM, Maisonneuve P, Pezzilli R. Pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis; aetiology, incidence, and early detection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;24(3):349–58. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Masamune A, Kikuta K, Hamada S, Nakano E, Kume K, Inui A, et al. Nationwide survey of hereditary pancreatitis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 31; doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1388-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Whitcomb DC, Lerch MM, DiMagno EP. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in patients with hereditary pancreatitis. JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):169–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.van der Heijden MS, Brody JR, Gallmeier E, Cunningham SC, Dezentje DA, Shen D, et al. Functional defects in the fanconi anemia pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. Am J Pathol. 2004 Aug;165(2):651–7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63329-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.van der Heijden MS, Brody JR, Dezentje DA, Gallmeier E, Cunningham SC, Swartz MJ, et al. In vivo therapeutic responses contingent on Fanconi anemia/BRCA2 status of the tumor. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 15;11(20):7508–15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Villarroel MC, Rajeshkumar NV, Garrido-Laguna I, De Jesus-Acosta A, Jones S, Maitra A, et al. Personalizing cancer treatment in the age of global genomic analyses: PALB2 gene mutations and the response to DNA damaging agents in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Jan;10(1):3–8. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):913–7. doi: 10.1038/nature03443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt ANJ, Martin NMB, Smith GCM, Ashworth A. BRCA2-deficient CAPAN-1 cells are extremely sensitive to the inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase: an issue of potency. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005 Sep;4(9):934–6. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.9.2141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Audeh MW, Weitzel JN, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2010 Jul 24;376(9737):235–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60892-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Perkhofer L, Schmitt A, Romero Carrasco MC, Ihle M, Hampp S, Ruess DA, et al. ATM Deficiency Generating Genomic Instability Sensitizes Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells to Therapy-Induced DNA Damage. Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;77(20):5576–90. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Jacob DA, Bahra M, Langrehr JM, Boas-Knoop S, Stefaniak R, Davis J, et al. Combination therapy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide and gemcitabine shows strong antitumor activity in pancreatic cancer cells. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;22(5):738–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen S, Wang G, Niu X, Zhao J, Tan W, Wang H, et al. Combination of AZD2281 (Olaparib) and GX15070 (Obatoclax) results in synergistic antitumor activities in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014 Jun 28;348(1–2):20–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Porcelli L, Quatrale AE, Mantuano P, Leo MG, Silvestris N, Rolland JF, et al. Optimize radiochemotherapy in pancreatic cancer: PARP inhibitors a new therapeutic opportunity. Mol Oncol. 2013 Jun;7(3):308–22. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pishvaian MJ, Wang H, Zhuang T, He AR, Hwang JJ, Hankin A, et al. A phase I/II study of ABT-888 in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (Ox) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 1;31(4_suppl):147–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.O’Reilly EM, Lowery MA, Segal MF, Smith SC, Moore MJ, Kindler HL, et al. Phase IB trial of cisplatin (C), gemcitabine (G), and veliparib (V) in patients with known or potential BRCA or PALB2-mutated pancreas adenocarcinoma (PC) J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15_suppl):4023–4023. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmaña J, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):244–50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Olaparib in gBRCA Mutated Pancreatic Cancer Whose Disease Has Not Progressed on First Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet] [cited 2017 Dec 2]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02184195.
  • 103.Amundadottir L, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Fuchs CS, Petersen GM, Arslan AA, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the ABO locus associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet. 2009 Sep;41(9):986–90. doi: 10.1038/ng.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Petersen GM, Amundadottir L, Fuchs CS, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Jacobs KB, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 13q22.1, 1q32.1 and 5p15.33. Nat Genet. 2010 Mar;42(3):224–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wolpin BM, Rizzato C, Kraft P, Kooperberg C, Petersen GM, Wang Z, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet. 2014 Sep;46(9):994–1000. doi: 10.1038/ng.3052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Childs EJ, Mocci E, Campa D, Bracci PM, Gallinger S, Goggins M, et al. Common variation at 2p13.3, 3q29, 7p13 and 17q25.1 associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet. 2015 Aug;47(8):911–6. doi: 10.1038/ng.3341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zhang M, Wang Z, Obazee O, Jia J, Childs EJ, Hoskins J, et al. Three new pancreatic cancer susceptibility signals identified on chromosomes 1q32.1, 5p15.33 and 8q24.21. Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 11;7(41):66328–43. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Willis JA, Olson SH, Orlow I, Mukherjee S, McWilliams RR, Kurtz RC, et al. A replication study and genome-wide scan of single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with pancreatic cancer risk and overall survival. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2012 Jul 15;18(14):3942–51. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rizzato C, Campa D, Pezzilli R, Soucek P, Greenhalf W, Capurso G, et al. ABO blood groups and pancreatic cancer risk and survival: results from the PANcreatic Disease ReseArch (PANDoRA) consortium. Oncol Rep. 2013 Apr;29(4):1637–44. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Risch HA, Lu L, Wang J, Zhang W, Ni Q, Gao Y-T, et al. ABO Blood Group and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Study in Shanghai and Meta-Analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun 15;177(12):1326–37. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Xu H-L, Cheng J-R, Zhang W, Wang J, Yu H, Ni Q-X, et al. Re-evaluation of ABO gene polymorphisms detected in a genome-wide association study and risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Chinese population. Chin J Cancer. 2014 Feb;33(2):68–73. doi: 10.5732/cjc.013.10060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Nakao M, Matsuo K, Hosono S, Ogata S, Ito H, Watanabe M, et al. ABO blood group alleles and the risk of pancreatic cancer in a Japanese population. Cancer Sci. 2011 May 1;102(5):1076–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01907.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wolpin BM, Chan AT, Hartge P, Chanock SJ, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, et al. ABO blood group and the risk of pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):424–31. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Wolpin BM, Kraft P, Gross M, Helzlsouer K, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Steplowski E, et al. Pancreatic cancer risk and ABO blood group alleles: results from the pancreatic cancer cohort consortium. Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 1;70(3):1015–23. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Mori A, Moser C, Lang SA, Hackl C, Gottfried E, Kreutz M, et al. Up-regulation of Krüppel-like factor 5 in pancreatic cancer is promoted by interleukin-1beta signaling and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Mol Cancer Res MCR. 2009 Aug;7(8):1390–8. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Diaferia GR, Balestrieri C, Prosperini E, Nicoli P, Spaggiari P, Zerbi A, et al. Dissection of transcriptional and cis-regulatory control of differentiation in human pancreatic cancer. EMBO J. 2016 Mar 15;35(6):595–617. doi: 10.15252/embj.201592404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Abjalimov IR, Zinovyeva MV, Nikolaev LG, Kopantzeva MR, Kopantzev EP, Sverdlov ED. Expression of transcription factor genes in cell lines corresponding to different stages of pancreatic cancer progression. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2017 Jul 1;475(1):267–70. doi: 10.1134/S160767291704007X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kondratyeva LG, Chernov IP, Zinovyeva MV, Kopantzev EP, Sverdlov ED. Expression of master regulatory genes of embryonic development in pancreatic tumors. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2017 Jul 1;475(1):250–2. doi: 10.1134/S1607672917040020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhang D, Dai Y, Cai Y, Suo T, Liu H, Wang Y, et al. KLF2 is downregulated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and inhibits the growth and migration of cancer cells. Tumor Biol. 2016 Mar 1;37(3):3425–31. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Luo Z, Li Y, Zuo M, Liu C, Yan D, Wang H, et al. Effect of NR5A2 inhibition on pancreatic cancer stem cell (CSC) properties and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers. Mol Carcinog. 2017 May 1;56(5):1438–48. doi: 10.1002/mc.22604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Flandez M, Cendrowski J, Cañamero M, Salas A, del Pozo N, Schoonjans K, et al. Nr5a2 heterozygosity sensitises to, and cooperates with, inflammation in KRasG12V-driven pancreatic tumourigenesis. Gut. 2014 Apr 1;63(4):647–55. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.von Figura G, Morris JP, Wright CVE, Hebrok M. Nr5a2 maintains acinar cell differentiation and constrains oncogenic Kras-mediated pancreatic neoplastic initiation. Gut. 2014 Apr 1;63(4):656–64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Campa D, Rizzato C, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Pacetti P, Vodicka P, Cleary SP, et al. TERT gene harbors multiple variants associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility. Int J Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;137(9):2175–83. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Huang D-S, Wang Z, He X-J, Diplas BH, Yang R, Killela PJ, et al. Recurrent TERT promoter mutations identified in a large-scale study of multiple tumour types are associated with increased TERT expression and telomerase activation. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2015 May;51(8):969–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Bojesen SE, Pooley KA, Johnatty SE, Beesley J, Michailidou K, Tyrer JP, et al. Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):371–84. 384e1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hezel AF, Kimmelman AC, Stanger BZ, Bardeesy N, DePinho RA. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev. 2006 May 15;20(10):1218–49. doi: 10.1101/gad.1415606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.van Heek NT, Meeker AK, Kern SE, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, et al. Telomere Shortening Is Nearly Universal in Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Am J Pathol. 2002 Nov 1;161(5):1541–7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64432-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bao Y, Prescott J, Yuan C, Zhang M, Kraft P, Babic A, et al. Leucocyte telomere length, genetic variants at the TERT gene region and risk of pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2017 Jun 1;66(6):1116–22. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.James MA, Wen W, Wang Y, Byers LA, Heymach JV, Coombes KR, et al. Functional Characterization of CLPTM1L as a Lung Cancer Risk Candidate Gene in the 5p15 33 Locus. PLOS ONE. 2012 Jun 4;7(6):e36116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ni Z, Tao K, Chen G, Chen Q, Tang J, Luo X, et al. CLPTM1L Is Overexpressed in Lung Cancer and Associated with Apoptosis. PLOS ONE. 2012 Dec 26;7(12):e52598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Jia J, Bosley AD, Thompson A, Hoskins JW, Cheuk A, Collins I, et al. CLPTM1L Promotes Growth and Enhances Aneuploidy in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2014 May 15;74(10):2785–95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.James MA, Vikis HG, Tate E, Rymaszewski AL, You M. CRR9/CLPTM1L Regulates Cell Survival Signaling and Is Required for Ras Transformation and Lung Tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 15;74(4):1116–27. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Adams JC, Seed B, Lawler J. Muskelin, a novel intracellular mediator of cell adhesive and cytoskeletal responses to thrombospondin-1. EMBO J. 1998 Sep 1;17(17):4964–74. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fernandez-Zapico ME, Lomberk GA, Tsuji S, DeMars CJ, Bardsley MR, Lin Y-H, et al. A functional family-wide screening of SP/KLF proteins identifies a subset of suppressors of KRAS-mediated cell growth. Biochem J. 2011 Apr 15;435(2):529–37. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Fan G, Sun L, Shan P, Zhang X, Huan J, Zhang X, et al. Loss of KLF14 triggers centrosome amplification and tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 6;6:8450. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Voight BF, Scott LJ, Steinthorsdottir V, Morris AP, Dina C, Welch RP, et al. Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis. Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):579–89. doi: 10.1038/ng.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wang J, Zhang J, Shen J, Hu D, Yan G, Liu X, et al. Association of KCNQ1 and KLF14 polymorphisms and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A global meta-analysis. Hum Immunol. 2014 Apr;75(4):342–7. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, Edmondson AC, Stylianou IM, Koseki M, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010 Aug 5;466(7307):707–13. doi: 10.1038/nature09270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Small KS, Hedman AK, Grundberg E, Nica AC, Thorleifsson G, Kong A, et al. Identification of an imprinted master trans regulator at the KLF14 locus related to multiple metabolic phenotypes. Nat Genet. 2011 Jun;43(6):561–4. doi: 10.1038/ng.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Barrett A, Pellet-Many C, Zachary IC, Evans IM, Frankel P. p130C as: a key signalling node in health and disease. Cell Signal. 2013 Apr;25(4):766–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Nikonova AS, Gaponova AV, Kudinov AE, Golemis EA. CAS proteins in health and disease: An update. IUBMB Life. 2014 Jun 1;66(6):387–95. doi: 10.1002/iub.1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Whitcomb DC, Lowe ME. Human pancreatic digestive enzymes. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9589-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Barrett JC, Clayton DG, Concannon P, Akolkar B, Cooper JD, Erlich HA, et al. Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2009 Jun;41(6):703–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Morris AP, Voight BF, Teslovich TM, Ferreira T, Segrè AV, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2012 Sep;44(9):981–90. doi: 10.1038/ng.2383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Harder MN, Ribel-Madsen R, Justesen JM, Sparsø T, Andersson EA, Grarup N, et al. Type 2 diabetes risk alleles near BCAR1 and in ANK1 associate with decreased β-cell function whereas risk alleles near ANKRD55 and GRB14 associate with decreased insulin sensitivity in the Danish Inter99 cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Apr;98(4):E801–806. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.’t Hart LM, Fritsche A, Nijpels G, van Leeuwen N, Donnelly LA, Dekker JM, et al. The CTRB1/2 locus affects diabetes susceptibility and treatment via the incretin pathway. Diabetes. 2013 Sep;62(9):3275–81. doi: 10.2337/db13-0227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Li D, Duell EJ, Yu K, Risch HA, Olson SH, Kooperberg C, et al. Pathway analysis of genome-wide association study data highlights pancreatic development genes as susceptibility factors for pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2012 Jul;33(7):1384–90. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Offield MF, Jetton TL, Labosky PA, Ray M, Stein RW, Magnuson MA, et al. PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum. Dev Camb Engl. 1996 Mar;122(3):983–95. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.3.983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Ahlgren U, Jonsson J, Jonsson L, Simu K, Edlund H. beta-cell-specific inactivation of the mouse Ipf1/Pdx1 gene results in loss of the beta-cell phenotype and maturity onset diabetes. Genes Dev. 1998 Jun 15;12(12):1763–8. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.12.1763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.McKinnon CM, Docherty K. Pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1, PDX-1, a major regulator of beta cell identity and function. Diabetologia. 2001 Oct;44(10):1203–14. doi: 10.1007/s001250100628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Melloul D, Tsur A, Zangen D. Pancreatic Duodenal Homeobox (PDX-1) in health and disease. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. 2002 Dec;15(9):1461–72. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2002.15.9.1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hao H-X, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Charlat O, Oster E, Avello M, et al. ZNRF3 promotes Wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner. Nature. 2012 Apr 29;485(7397):195–200. doi: 10.1038/nature11019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Magni M, Ruscica V, Buscemi G, Kim J-E, Nachimuthu BT, Fontanella E, et al. Chk2 and REGγ-dependent DBC1 regulation in DNA damage induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Dec 1;42(21):13150–60. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Nevanlinna H, Bartek J. The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility. Oncogene. 2006 Sep 25;25(43):5912–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Siołek M, Cybulski C, Gąsior-Perczak D, Kowalik A, Kozak-Klonowska B, Kowalska A, et al. CHEK2 mutations and the risk of papillary thyroid cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;137(3):548–52. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lawrenson K, Iversen ES, Tyrer J, Weber RP, Concannon P, Hazelett DJ, et al. Common variants at the CHEK2 gene locus and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2015 Nov;36(11):1341–53. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Havranek O, Kleiblova P, Hojny J, Lhota F, Soucek P, Trneny M, et al. Association of Germline CHEK2 Gene Variants with Risk and Prognosis of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. PloS One. 2015;10(10):e0140819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Wang Y, Dai B, Ye D. CHEK2 mutation and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(9):15708–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Lener MR, Kashyap A, Kluźniak W, Cybulski C, Soluch A, Pietrzak S, et al. The Prevalence of Founder Mutations among Individuals from Families with Familial Pancreatic Cancer Syndrome. Cancer Res Treat Off J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2017 Apr;49(2):430–6. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Wu C, Miao X, Huang L, Che X, Jiang G, Yu D, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer in Chinese populations. Nat Genet. 2011 Dec 11;44(1):62–6. doi: 10.1038/ng.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Zheng J, Huang X, Tan W, Yu D, Du Z, Chang J, et al. Pancreatic cancer risk variant in LINC00673 creates a miR-1231 binding site and interferes with PTPN11 degradation. Nat Genet. 2016 May 23;48(7) doi: 10.1038/ng.3568. ng.3568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Shi X, Ma C, Zhu Q, Yuan D, Sun M, Gu X, et al. Upregulation of long intergenic noncoding RNA 00673 promotes tumor proliferation via LSD1 interaction and repression of NCALD in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016 May 3;7(18):25558–75. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ma C, Wu G, Zhu Q, Liu H, Yao Y, Yuan D, et al. Long intergenic noncoding RNA 00673 promotes non-small-cell lung cancer metastasis by binding with EZH2 and causing epigenetic silencing of HOXA5. Oncotarget. 2017 May 16;8(20):32696–705. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Lu W, Zhang H, Niu Y, Wu Y, Sun W, Li H, et al. Long non-coding RNA linc00673 regulated non-small cell lung cancer proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial mesenchymal transition by sponging miR-1505p. Mol Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0685-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Yu J, Liu Y, Gong Z, Zhang S, Guo C, Li X, et al. Overexpression long non-coding RNA LINC00673 is associated with poor prognosis and promotes invasion and metastasis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(10):16621–32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Abdul-Rahman U, Győrffy B, Adams BD. Iinc00673 (ERRLR01) is a prognostic indicator of overall survival in breast cancer. Transcription. 2017 Aug 10;:1–13. doi: 10.1080/21541264.2017.1329684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Sherman EA, Strauss KA, Tortorelli S, Bennett MJ, Knerr I, Morton DH, et al. Genetic mapping of glutaric aciduria, type 3, to chromosome 7 and identification of mutations in c7orf10. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Nov;83(5):604–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Ito Y, Takeda T, Wakasa K-I, Tsujimoto M, Sakon M, Matsuura N. Expression of p73 and p63 proteins in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: p73 overexpression is inversely correlated with biological aggressiveness. Int J Mol Med. 2001 Jul 1;8(1):67–71. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.8.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Melino G. p63 is a suppressor of tumorigenesis and metastasis interacting with mutant p53. Cell Death Differ. 2011 Sep;18(9):1487–99. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Danilov AV, Neupane D, Nagaraja AS, Feofanova EV, Humphries LA, DiRenzo J, et al. DeltaNp63alpha-mediated induction of epidermal growth factor receptor promotes pancreatic cancer cell growth and chemoresistance. PloS One. 2011;6(10):e26815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Flores ER, Sengupta S, Miller JB, Newman JJ, Bronson R, Crowley D, et al. Tumor predisposition in mice mutant for p63 and p73: evidence for broader tumor suppressor functions for the p53 family. Cancer Cell. 2005 Apr;7(4):363–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Kunisaki R, Ikawa S, Maeda T, Nakazaki Y, Kurita R, Harata M, et al. p51/p63 a novel p53 homologue, potentiates p53 activity and is a human cancer gene therapy candidate. J Gene Med. 2006 Sep;8(9):1121–30. doi: 10.1002/jgm.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Park SL, Chang S-C, Cai L, Cordon-Cardo C, Ding B-G, Greenland S, et al. Associations between variants of the 8q24 chromosome and nine smoking-related cancer sites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2008 Nov;17(11):3193–202. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Goode EL, Chenevix-Trench G, Song H, Ramus SJ, Notaridou M, Lawrenson K, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24. Nat Genet. 2010 Oct;42(10):874–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Masson G, Petursdottir V, Hardarson S, et al. A common variant at 8q24.21 is associated with renal cell cancer. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2776. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Sur I, Tuupanen S, Whitington T, Aaltonen LA, Taipale J. Lessons from functional analysis of genome-wide association studies. Cancer Res. 2013 Jul 15;73(14):4180–4. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Tanskanen T, van den Berg L, Välimäki N, Aavikko M, Ness-Jensen E, Hveem K, et al. Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis in Northern European populations replicate multiple colorectal cancer risk loci. Int J Cancer. 2017 Sep 28; doi: 10.1002/ijc.31076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Hessmann E, Schneider G, Ellenrieder V, Siveke JT. MYC in pancreatic cancer: novel mechanistic insights and their translation into therapeutic strategies. Oncogene. 2016 Mar 31;35(13):1609–18. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Schleger C, Verbeke C, Hildenbrand R, Zentgraf H, Bleyl U. c-MYC activation in primary and metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical significance. Mod Pathol Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2002 Apr;15(4):462–9. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Birnbaum DJ, Adélaïde J, Mamessier E, Finetti P, Lagarde A, Monges G, et al. Genome profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011 Jun;50(6):456–65. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Lin W, Rajbhandari N, Liu C, Sakamoto K, Zhang Q, Triplett AA, et al. Dormant cancer cells contribute to residual disease in a model of reversible pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 15;73(6):1821–30. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Low S-K, Kuchiba A, Zembutsu H, Saito A, Takahashi A, Kubo M, et al. Genome-wide association study of pancreatic cancer in Japanese population. PloS One. 2010 Jul 29;5(7):e11824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Liang Y, Wu H, Lei R, Chong RA, Wei Y, Lu X, et al. Transcriptional network analysis identifies BACH1 as a master regulator of breast cancer bone metastasis. J Biol Chem. 2012 Sep 28;287(40):33533–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.392332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Davudian S, Shajari N, Kazemi T, Mansoori B, Salehi S, Mohammadi A, et al. BACH1 silencing by siRNA inhibits migration of HT-29 colon cancer cells through reduction of metastasis-related genes. Biomed Pharmacother Biomedecine Pharmacother. 2016 Dec;84:191–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Shajari N, Davudian S, Kazemi T, Mansoori B, Salehi S, Khaze Shahgoli V, et al. Silencing of BACH1 inhibits invasion and migration of prostate cancer cells by altering metastasis-related gene expression. Artif Cells Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 2017;11:1–10. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1374284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Terris B, Blaveri E, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Jones M, Missiaglia E, Ruszniewski P, et al. Characterization of gene expression profiles in intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Pathol. 2002 May;160(5):1745–54. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61121-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Yeh T-S, Jan Y-Y, Chiu C-T, Ho Y-B, Chen T-C, Lee K-F, et al. Characterisation of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, trefoil factor 1, and epidermal growth factor and its receptor in pancreatic cystic neoplasms and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2002 Nov;51(5):712–6. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.5.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Prasad NB, Biankin AV, Fukushima N, Maitra A, Dhara S, Elkahloun AG, et al. Gene expression profiles in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia reflect the effects of Hedgehog signaling on pancreatic ductal epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2005 Mar 1;65(5):1619–26. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Sunagawa M, Yamaguchi J, Kokuryo T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, et al. Trefoil factor family 1 expression in the invasion front is a poor prognostic factor associated with lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatol Off J Int Assoc Pancreatol IAP Al. 2017 Oct;17(5):782–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Radiloff DR, Wakeman TP, Feng J, Schilling S, Seto E, Wang XF. Trefoil factor 1 acts to suppress senescence induced by oncogene activation during the cellular transformation process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 19;108(16):6591–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017269108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Arumugam T, Brandt W, Ramachandran V, Moore TT, Wang H, May FE, et al. Trefoil factor 1 stimulates both pancreatic cancer and stellate cells and increases metastasis. Pancreas. 2011 Aug;40(6):815–22. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31821f6927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Zhang Z, Chen Y, Tang J, Xie X. Frequent loss expression of dab2 and promotor hypermethylation in human cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Mar;30(2):432–7. doi: 10.12669/pjms.302.4486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Du L, Zhao Z, Ma X, Hsiao T-H, Chen Y, Young E, et al. miR-93-directed downregulation of DAB2 defines a novel oncogenic pathway in lung cancer. Oncogene. 2014 Aug 21;33(34):4307–15. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Xie Y, Zhang Y, Jiang L, Zhang M, Chen Z, Liu D, et al. Disabled homolog 2 is required for migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells. Front Med. 2015 Sep;9(3):312–21. doi: 10.1007/s11684-015-0401-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Cheong S-M, Choi H, Hong BS, Gho YS, Han JK. Dab2 is pivotal for endothelial cell migration by mediating VEGF expression in cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2012 Mar 10;318(5):550–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Wang Z, Tseng C-P, Pong R-C, Chen H, McConnell JD, Navone N, et al. The mechanism of growth-inhibitory effect of DOC-2/DAB2 in prostate cancer. Characterization of a novel GTPase-activating protein associated with N-terminal domain of DOC-2/DAB2. J Biol Chem. 2002 Apr 12;277(15):12622–31. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110568200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Su Q, Wang Y, Zhao J, Ma C, Wu T, Jin T, et al. Polymorphisms of PRLHR and HSPA12A and risk of gastric and colorectal cancer in the Chinese Han population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 25;15:107. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0336-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Park MY, Kim HS, Lee M, Park B, Lee HY, Cho EB, et al. FAM19A5, a brain-specific chemokine, inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast formation through formyl peptide receptor 2. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 14;7(1):15575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15586-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Poley J-W, Kamel I, et al. International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2013 Mar;62(3):339–47. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES