Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2018 Feb 3;55(4):1444–1454. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3060-y

Characterization of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seed volatile compounds obtained by supercritical carbon dioxide process

R Swapna sonale 1, K Ramalakshmi 1,, K Udaya Sankar 1
PMCID: PMC5876215  PMID: 29606759

Abstract

Extraction process employing Supercritical fluid carbon dioxide (SCF) yields bioactive compounds near natural forms without any artifact formation. Neem seed was subjected to SCF at different temperatures and pressure conditions. These extracts were partitioned to separate volatile fraction and were analyzed by Gas Chromatography–Mass spectroscopy along with the volatiles extracted by the hydro-distillation method. Experimental results show that there is a significant effect of pressure and temperature on isolation of a number of volatile compounds as well as retention of biologically active compounds. Twenty-five volatile compounds were isolated in the Hydro-distillate compare to the SCF extract of 100 bar, 40 °C which showed forty volatile compounds corresponds to 76.38 and 92.39% of total volatiles respectively. The majority of bioactive compounds such as Terpinen-4-ol, 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl, allyl isopropyl sulphide, Cycloisolongifolene, á-Bisabolene, (-)-α-Panasinsen, Isocaryophyllene, trans-Sesquisabinene hydrate, 1-Naphthalenol, were identified in the extract when isolated at 100 bar and 40 °C.

Keywords: Azadirachta indica, Neem seed, Kernel, Volatile, Supercritical fluid carbon dioxide extraction

Introduction

Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) tree belongs to the family of Meliaceae. Neem is one of the most versatile medicinal plants having a broad spectrum of biological activity in India and its neighboring countries since immemorial. Neem seed oil and extract are proved effective against some fungi that cause infection to human body. It is used as anthelmintic, antileprotic (prevents leprosy), antibacterial, antidermatophytic activity. Neem seed spent (cake) is an active ingredient in preparation of mosquito repellent coil. A bitter compound, nimbidin is isolated from seeds which is effective in reducing fasting blood glucose (Biswas et al. 2002). The different parts of neem (seeds, leaves, flowers and bark) are used as traditional medicine for the household remedy against various human ailments. It also used as the natural pesticide, a raw material for cosmetic industry and other commodities (Ghimeray et al. 2009; Rashid et al. 2004; Olabinri et al. 2009; Aromdee and Sriubolmas 2006). Neem seed kernels constitute 50–60% of the seed and the remaining is the kernel portion. The fat content of the kernels ranges from 33 to 45%. Neem seed contains 40–45% of oil and remaining is the cellular matrix of the seeds. The oil is brownish yellow, non- drying oil with an acrid taste and unpleasant odor (Johnson and Morgan 1997). Several valuable bioactive substances from limonoids class of triterpenoids were found in neem oil. Azadirachtin (Azadirachtin A), Nimbidiol, 3-tigloylazadirachtol (Azadirachtin B), Salannol, Salannin, Nimbinin, Nimbin, Nimbidin, and 1-tigloyl-3- acetyl-11- hydroxymeliacarpin (Azadirachtin D) non volatile compounds are the major once (Mongkholkhajornsilp et al. 2005; Morgan 2009; Melwita and Ju 2010). Further, sulfur modified fatty substance like loeic acid (50–60%), palmitic acid (13–15%), stearic acid (14–19%), linoleic acid (8–16%) and arachidic acid (1–3%) are present in neem seed oil.

Volatiles isolated from neem seed oil also play a vital role in health care systems of the most traditional and modern medicines. By head space analysis insect repellent active compounds such as caryophyllene oxide, limonene, linalool, 1-hexanol and organosulphur compounds were identified from neem seed volatiles.

Hydro-distillation is a traditional technique for extraction of volatile oil. This distillation has several disadvantages, such as incomplete extraction of volatiles from plant materials, high operating temperatures with the consequent breakdown of thermally labile components, promotion of hydration reactions of chemical constituents, hydrolysis and solubilization in water of some compounds that alter the flavor and fragrance profile of many essential oils extracted by this technique. It also requires a post extraction process to remove water (Metherel et al. 2009). The other problem with this method is the production of waste water with a high biological oxygen demand (BOD). With high BOD the release of waste water is not permitted in many countries, again which requires an expensive installation of water treatment facility (O’shea et al. 2001).

In recent decades, the supercritical fluid carbon dioxide extraction (SCF-CO2) has received special attention in extraction of volatile oil from natural materials. In compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) main volatile oil constituents like hydrocarbon and oxygenated mono- and sesquiterpenes are solubilized (Stahl and Gerard 1985). In fact, CO2 is physiologically harmless, non-toxic and non-corrosive. It readily reaches critical temperature (31.1 °C) and pressure (73.8 bar). Very little work was traced about the essential oil of neem seed by Supercritical fluid extraction. The present study was undertaken to employ supercritical carbon dioxide to extract the volatiles from neem seed and characterization of the constituents.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

Analytical grade chloroform procured from Merck (Mumbai, India). Carbon dioxide (purity 99.9%) was obtained from M/S Kiran Corporation, Mysore, India. Homologous series of C8-C22 n-alkane standards were procured from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Anhydrous sodium sulfate was obtained from SLR Chemicals (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals, solvents, and reagents used were of analytical grade.

Plant material

Neem seeds were purchased from a local market at Mysore, Karnataka, India. The seeds were manually cleaned to remove the adhering soil and extraneous matter if any. These cleaned neem seeds were dried in cabinet tray drier (M/S Armstrong Smith, India) at 40 °C for 24 h. Further, neem seed was dehulled by using DIAF huller (Crompton Parkinson Ltd, Bombay). Dehulled neem seed was ground by using hammer mill (Model: CIS-100, M/s Galai Production, Israel) to get powder of 32 mesh size. The moisture content of neem seed powder is 16 ± 0.1%.

Supercritical fluid carbon dioxide extraction and partitioning of flavor volatiles

Extractions were carried out in NOVA Swiss equipment (WERKEAG, EX 1000, 1.4–1.2 V type, Switzerland) designed for working pressure of 1000 bar and temperature of 100 °C. Neem seed powder (300 g) was loaded into a steel cylinder equipped with sintered metal plate on both ends. The cylinder was then introduced into the extraction vessel, and required extractor and separator temperatures were maintained using thermostat water circulators. CO2 supplied from a gas cylinder was compressed by using two diaphragm compressors to the desired pressure by adjusting the pressure controller and heated to the specified temperature using a heat exchanger to reach the supercritical state (Zarena et al. 2012). Nine experiments were carried out in duplicates at temperatures of 40, 50 and 60 °C; the pressure of 100, 150 and 200 bar (Table 1). After completion of an experiment, the extract was collected from the separator and stored at 4 °C for further study.

Table 1.

Yield of SCF extracts in different conditions

No of SCF experiments Yielda (g/100 g) Yielda of Volatiles (mg/100 g)
100 bar-40 °C 4.61 24
100 bar-50 °C 4.62 39
100 bar-60 °C 1.2 15
150 bar-40 °C 17.11 49
150 bar-50 °C 10.72 35
150 bar-60 °C 10.99 19
200 bar-40 °C 31.57 162
200 bar-50 °C 18.43 68
200 bar-60 °C 21.39 67

aYield was given in raw material basis

All the SCF extracts were further hydro-distilled, and the distillate was partitioned with chloroform to separate the volatiles. Chloroform was removed using a rotavapor (RE111, Buchi, Switzerland) and pale yellow colored oil obtained was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The flavor isolate was stored at 4 °C for further study.

Extraction of volatile oil by hydro-distillation (Conventional method)

Neem seed powder (250 g) was defatted by Soxhlet extraction using petroleum ether (60–80 °C) with 15–16 siphons in 12 h. Solvent adhering to the Marc was expelled by a screw press. Further, neem seed powder was dried in the sun for 2 h and again dried in an oven at 105 °C for 2 h. Defatted neem seed powder was subjected to hydro-distillation in Clevenger distillation until all the oil is collected (9 h). The pale brown colored oil obtained was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored at 4 °C for further analysis. All the experiments were executed in triplicate, and the result was expressed.

Chemical characterization of volatile oil and chromatographic analysis

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis

The volatile oil was characterized using Perkin Elmer GC equipped with quadrupole mass spectrometer (Model: Turbomass Gold) fitted with an Elite-5 fused silica column (30.0 m × 250 µm film thickness) coated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Initially, the oven temperature was held at 35 °C for 2 min, ramp 2 °C/min to 70 °C, held for 0 min then increased at 4 °C/min to 250 °C, held for 5 min at final temperature. The carrier gas (helium) was delivered with 75 kPa inlet pressure with linear velocity (20 cm/s), injector temperature (180 °C) and detector temperature (230 °C). Samples were diluted with chloroform, and 1 µl was injected. The mixture of n-alkanes as standards (C8–C24) diluted with chloroform was also injected and analyzed at same conditions to determine the (Jennings and Shibamoto 1980; Kubra and Rao 2012) kovats’ retention indices by the following equation.

KI = 100[n + (N−n) X {log tr(unknown)−log tr(n)}/{log tr(N)−log tr(n)}]

where (n) is stand for the number of carbon atoms in the shorter chain alkane, N is the number of carbon atoms in the longer chain alkane, (tr) is the adjusted retention times for unknown compounds, tr (n), shorter-chain and tr (N), longer-chain alkanes. The total volatile production was estimated as the sum of all GC-FID peak areas in the chromatogram, and individual compounds were quantified as relative percent area. All data are means of three independent determinations expressed as the percentage of total peak area (Shivakumar et al. 2012).

Results and discussion

Supercritical fluid extraction has increased during two last decades in the extraction of plant volatile components since it is a rapid, selective and convenient method. Food grade Carbon dioxide (GRAS) which is used in SCF is an excellent alternative for chemical solvents (Pourmortazavi and Hajimirsadeghi 2007). In general, the extractability of volatile and non-volatile compounds by SCF depends on the occurrence of functional groups, molecular mass and polarity. Essential oil of coriander seeds was extracted by SCF under different conditions of temperature and pressure by Grosso et al. (2008). GC–MS analysis of volatile oil composition of SCF extract reveals that the best condition was achieved at 90 bar and 40 °C.

Extraction efficiency by evaluating SCF parameters

Neem seed (39 kg) with the moisture content of 17% was dehulled to get the kernels of 16 kg which possess the moisture content of 19.3%. The dehulled seed was ground and used for further experiments.

Supercritical fluid extraction has attracted a vast deal of attention. Indeed, it is an excellent alternative method for seed oil extraction to replace classical industrial methods. It becomes the focus of attention due to its chemical and physical properties. Furthermore, it offers recovery of solvent-free analyte from solid or semi-solid samples that are equal to or better than that of conventional extraction process (Herrero et al. 2010). CO2 is environmentally friendly and recognized as safe. It is also essential for the sample preparations of food and natural product. SCF using CO2 can be operated at low temperatures using a non-oxidant medium, which allows the extraction of thermally labile or easily oxidized compounds. In this study, the volatile composition of neem seed at three pressures (100, 150 and 200 bar) and three temperatures (40, 50 and 60 °C) in different combination was studied. And also, SCF volatile extract was compared with conventional hydro-distillation process.

In SCF, totally nine experiments conducted in duplicates and the results were analyzed. The method of extraction usually has a significant effect on the quality and quantity of the volatile oils by varying temperature and pressure in SCF extraction. The extraction yields of nine experiments were evaluated, the factor (e.g., pressure) reveal how the extraction yield changes when the level of that factor is changed. As per the earlier report (Mostafa et al. 2004), an increase in extraction pressure, at a constant temperature, leads to higher fluid density. This higher fluid density increases the solubility of the analytes.

The effect of temperature on the yield as well as the composition of extracts was evaluated. Higher temperature decreased fluid density and thus reduced extraction efficiency. When extraction was done at the different pressure of 100, 150 and 200 bar, the yield of volatile extract was more at 40 °C (Table 1). Further, it was observed that the volatiles percentage is directly related to the pressure and temperature, in turn, the density of carbon dioxide. With increasing temperature, at the pressure of 100 bar, the extract yields decreased drastically, but there is an increase in the volatiles percentage in the extract. But, at 150 and 200 bar higher pressures, there is definite increase in the volatiles percentage but not perceptible, as the total extract yields increased and the solubilization of fatty oil as well as high molecular compounds with increased density of carbon dioxide. In the extraction of pepper oil, this relationship on temperature, pressure density of volatiles correlates the earlier publications (Sankar 1989). The conventional method of hydro-distillation has been traditionally used for the extraction of volatile oils on a laboratory scale. In this study, the volatile composition of neem seed obtained by SCF extraction was compared with the conventional extraction. Further, the conventional hydro-distillation of neem seed volatile extract yielded 33 ± 0.76 mg/100 g after the removal of 53% of fat.

GC–MS analysis

Biogenetically, most of the volatile compounds are derived from mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway (i.e., triterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids). However, monoterpenoids, diterpenoids, and tetraterpenoids are biosynthesized via the plastidial methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) (Sawai and Saito 2011). In general, mono and diterpenes are more soluble than paraffin and fatty acids at low CO2 densities (T = 40–50 °C, p = 80–90 bar), whereas sesquiterpenes and oxygenated terpenes are soluble at high CO2 densities (T = 40–50 °C, p = 100–200 bar). The volatile neem isolates were subjected to GC–MS analysis. The chemical components present in the volatile oil were identified according to their order of elution on Elite-5 column.

All nine SCF experiment results were analyzed by GC–MS. At 100 bar, 40 °C forty compounds were identified, which represented 92.39% of total volatiles. Similarly, at 100 bar, 50 °C thirty-two compounds (85.9%), 100 bar, 60 °C twenty-two (56.01%), 150 bar, 40 °C thirty-three (73.34%), 150 bar, 50 °C thirty-seven (70.52%), 150 bar, 60 °C thirty-three (76.87%), 200 bar, 40 °C twenty-seven (65.71%), 200 bar, 50 °C nine (72.78%), 200 bar, 60 °C twenty three (52.47%) were identified respectively. The results of SCF volatile compounds are compiled in Table 2 (SCF 100 bar at 40, 50 and 60 °C), Table 3 (SCF 150 bar at 40, 50 and 60 °C) and Table 4 (SCF 200 bar at 40, 50 and 60 °C). Further, the hydro-distillation of neem seed volatile extract is 33 mg/100 g. Thirty-two compounds were identified which represent the 76.38% of the total volatile extract.

Table 2.

Identification of neem seed (100 bar, 40, 50 and 60 °C) volatile compounds by GC–MS

Sl. no RT (min) Compound 100 bar (ppm) RI
40 °C 50 °C 60 °C
1 16.873 Butanal, oxime 1.69 1020
2 25.577 Pyrazine, 3,5-diethyl-2-methyl- 1.21 1170
3 26.562 Terpinen-4-ol 1.28 1189
4 27.423 Octanoic acid 4.08 2.26 1207
27.563 1210
5 31.044 Nonanoic acid 2.94 2.57 1297
31.209 1301
6 31.969 2, 4- Decadienal 2.50 0.77 1323
31.969
7 32.2 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1.51 1330
8 33.72 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-pentyl- 1.02 0.06 1373
33.72
9 35.146 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, 2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3à,3aá,7á,8aà)]- 1.14 1414
10 35.276 Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-4-(1-methylethylidene)- 1.73 1418
11 35.421 Cedrene 2.06 1423
12 35.841 (+)-epi-Bicyclosesquiphellandrene 2.952 1436
13 35.971 Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene, 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)- 6.29 1440
14 36.066 1,2,4-Thiadiazole-3,5-diamine 11.23 1443
15 36.081 1-Propene, 3-[(1-methylethyl)thio]- (or) Allyl isopropyl sulfide 8.71 8.61 1444
36.111 1445
16 36.251 4,7-Methanoazulene, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-1,4,9,9-tetramethyl-, [1S-(1à,4à,7à)]- 1.23 1449
17 36.381 γ-Muurolene 2.53 1453
18 36.656 Cyclohexene, 3-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-6-methylene-, [S-(R*,S*)]- 1.10 1461
19 36.986 Spiro[4.5]dec-7-ene, 1,8-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1α,4β,5α)]- 5.88 1472
20 37.527 Cycloisolongifolene 1.43 1488
21 37.847 Guaia-1(10),11-diene 10.2 1498
22 38.327 á-Bisabolene 9.57 1514
23 38.602 (-)-α-Panasinsen 1.06 1523
24 39.127 Dodecane, 4,6-dimethyl- 1.78 1541
25 39.332 Isocaryophyllene 1.22 1548
26 40.293 Dodecanoic acid 1.13 1580
27 40.643 4,6-Diethyl-1,2,3,5-tetrathiolane 1.56 1591
40.753 1595
28 40.833 2-(2-Isopropenyl-5-methyl-cyclopentyl)-acetamide 0.68 1598
29 42.613 trans-Sesquisabinene hydrate 1.90 0.76 1661
42.614
30 42.899 Cedrane or 1H-3a,7- 1.35 0.82 1671
42.899 Methanoazulene, octahydro-3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3à,3aá,6à,7á,8aà)]-
31 43.349 1-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethylidene)-, [1R-(1α,4aβ,8aα)]- 14.94 10.13 1687
43.424 1690
32 43.684 4-(1,5-Dimethylhex-4- 1.89 1.40 1699
43.689 enyl)cyclohex-2-enone
33 43.794 2,4a-Methanonaphthalen-7(4aH)-one, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-1,1,5,5-tetramethyl-, (2 s-cis)- (or) Isolongifolen-9-one 2.35 1627
34 43.799 Neoisolongifolene, 8-oxo- 1.50 1703
35 43.804 Isolongifolen-9-one (or) 2,4a-Methanonaphthalen-7(4aH)-one, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-1,1,5,5-tetramethyl-, (2 s-cis)- 1.04 1703
36 44.679 (Z)6,(Z)9-Pentadecadien-1-ol 1.39 1737
37 45.115 Decane, 3-ethyl-3-methyl- 1.75 1753
38 45.885 Syn-Tricyclo[5.1.0.0(2,4)]oct-5-ene, 3,3,5,6,8,8-hexamethyl- 1.02 1782
39 49.431 Benzenamine, 4,5-dimethyl-2-(4-pyridylmethoxy)- 1.58 1922
40 49.446 Isobenzofuran-1(3H)-one, 3-(3-furyl)-3a,4,5,6-tetrahydro-3a,7-dimethyl- 0.70 1922
41 49.662 Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester 9.78 1932
42 49.676 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 11.56 2.35 8.88 1927
49.681 1932
51.287 1998
43 50.467 Tetradecane,1-iodo- 1.60 1965
44 50.567 n-Hexadecanoic acid 69.23 101.8 233.79 1969
50.837 28.04 1980
50.982 1986
51.172 1994
45 51.162 (S)-(+)-6-Methyl-1-octanol 6.68 1993
51.307 Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester 8.52 0.81 8.88 1999
51.287 1998
46 53.228 11,14-Eicosadienoic acid, methyl ester 1.10 4.99 2083
53.638 2100
47 53.378 trans-13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester 2.73 2089
48 53.658 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester 5.04 0.88 2101
53.663
49 53.768 6-Octadecenoic acid, methyl 2.07 10.85 2106
53.783 ester, (Z)-
50 53.788 8-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester 11.79 2106
51 54.043 Methyl stearate 1.71 1.10 2117
54.353
52 54.353 Methyl 8-methyl- nonanoate 2.69 2130
53 54.894 Cis-Vaccenic acid (or) 11- Octadecenoic acid, (Z)- 8.77 120.74 145.98 2153
54.968 2156
55.023 2158
57.189 2246
54 55.249 (E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester 2.11 1.12 4.51 2167
55.264 2168
55.278 2168
55 55.389 Octadecanoic acid (or) stearic acid 2.76 35.21 34.28 2173
55.439 2175
55.494 2177
56 55.659 Heptadecane, 9-hexyl- 7.36 2184
63.562 5.31 2485
57 55.929 Nonadecane, 2-methyl- 12.84 2195
58 57.844 2-methyltetracosane 0.67 2271
59 61.916 Nonadecane, 2-methyl 0.72 2426
60 63.111 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(6-methylheptyl) ester (or) Phthalic acid, bis(6-methylheptyl) ester 9.23 2469
61 63.827 Eicosane, 2-methyl- 0.61 2495
62 64.547 Anthracene, 9- dodecyltetradecahydro 7.02 2520
63 65.013 Octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)- 2.08 2537
64 65.843 Phthalic acid, 4-methylpent-2-yl nonyl ester 0.73 2565
66.288 1.77 2581
66.698 0.63 2595
65 66.858 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dinonyl ester 0.94 2600

Table 3.

Identification of neem seed (150 bar, 40, 50 and 60 °C) volatile compounds by GC–MS

Sl. no RT (min) Compound 150 bar (ppm) RI
40 °C 50 °C 60 °C
1 16.358 Amylene hydrate 2.35 1011
2 22.706 Nonanal 0.74 1110
3 23.331 2,3-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-2-butenoic lactone 0.49 1124
4 26.547 3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-methyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-, (R)- 0.91 1188
5 27.198 Hexan-3-yl propyl carbonate 2.53 1201
6 30.304 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)- 0.94 1279
7 30.824 Nonanoic acid 8.38 2.44 1.89 1292
30.859 1292
30.924 1294
8 31.969 2, 4- Decadienal 1.42 0.78 1.12 1323
31.974 1323
31.979 1324
9 32.204 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 3.02 1.07 1330
32.210
32.485 2.79
32.495 1.52
10 32.745 1-Propene, 1,1’-thiobis- 2.06 1346
32.755 Propanal, 2-methyl-, ethylhydrazone 1.47 1346
11 33.72 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-pentyl- 1.58 0.85 0.48 1373
33.72 1373
33.725 1373
12 34.125 n- Decanoic acid 1.01 1384
13 34.345 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate, (Z)- 4.32 1390
14 34.365 (E)-3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl ethyl carbonate 2.15 1390
15 35.831 cis-muurola-4(14),5-diene 0.91 0.515 1436
35.841
16 35.951 Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene, 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)- 2.34 1.78 1439
35.961 1440
17 36.046 1-Propene, 3-[(1-methylethyl)thio]- 26.69 8.97 7.97 1442
36.051 1443
36.076 1443
18 36.361 1-Ethyl-3-vinyl-adamantane 0.75 1452
19 36.371 Germacrene D (or) 1,6-Cyclodecadiene, 1-methyl-5-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [S-(E,E)]- 0.49 1453
20 36.976 Spiro[4.5]dec-7-ene, 1,8- 2.68 1.47 1471
36.981 dimethyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1à,4á,5à)]- 1471
21 37.507 Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl 1.25 0.99 1487
37.512 1488
22 37.827 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a- 5.28 2.65 1497
37.837 octahydro-1,8a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1à,7á,8aà)]- 1497
23 37.832 á-Panasinsene 0.92 1497
24 38.297 β-Bisabolene 2.19 5.15 3.30 1513
38.302
38.312
25 39.132 Undecane, 3,8-dimethyl- 1.26 1541
26 40.22 Dodecanoic acid 1.14 0.70 1578
40.243
27 40.638 4,6-Diethyl-1,2,3,5-tetrathiolane 2.84 0.99
40.748 1.66
28 40.873 Heptadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl- 1.95 1599
29 41.113 Diethyl Phthalate 1.29 1.18 1607
41.103
30 42.614 trans-Sesquisabinene hydrate 1.99 1661
31 42.829 Hexasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- 1.85 1669
32 42.889 Aromadendran 2.33 0.64 1671
42.889
33 43.414 1-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethylidene)-, [1R-(1α,4aβ,8aα)]- (or) Eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol; Juniper camphor 49.15 5.81 1689
43.494 1692
34 43.529 Selina-6-en-4-ol 7.67 1693
35 43.679 4-(1,5-Dimethylhex-4-enyl)cyclohex-2-enone 3.23 1698
36 43.789 2,4a-Methanonaphthalen-7(4aH)-one, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-1,1,5,5-tetramethyl-, (2 s-cis)- 7.19 2.61 1.60 1703
43.789 1703
43.804 1703
37 44.679 (Z)6,(Z)9-Pentadecadien-1-ol 1.87 0.69 0.59 1737
44.679 1737
44.679 1737
38 45.115 2-Bromo dodecane 1.19 1753
39 45.71 Tetradecanoic acid 1.15 0.56 1775
45.74 1776
40 45.875 syn-Tricyclo[5.1.0.0(2,4)]oct-5-ene, 3,3,5,6,8,8-hexamethyl- 1.82 1781
41 46.52 7-Oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane, 1-methyl-4-(2-methyloxiranyl)- 1.36 1805
42 47.06 Heptasiloxane, hexadecamethyl- 1.33 1827
43 48.386 Phthalic acid, hex-3-yl isobutyl ester 3.47 0.79 1879
48.386 1879
44 49.651 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 14.46 6.27 3.17 1931
49.656 1928
49.661 1932
45 50.902 n- Hexadecanoic acid 180.48 61.91 77.59 1983
50.922 1984
51.087 1990
46 51.287 Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester 16.38 5.67 10.66 1998
51.287 1998
51.292 1999
47 53.633 11,14-Eicosadienoic acid, methyl ester 2.34 2100
48 53.643 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester (or) Linoleic acid, methyl ester 4.33 1.14 2100
53.648
49 53.763 6-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- 5.06 2105
50 53.768 trans-13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester 11.05 2.84 2106
53.768
51 54.283 Hexasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- 1.34 2127
52 54.333 Methyl stearate 1.32 0.53 2129
54.348
53 54.343 Hexadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, methyl ester 1.68 2130
54 54.908 Cis-Vaccenic acid (or) 11- 62.30 27.09 26.57 2153
54.913 Octadecenoic acid, (Z)- 2153
55.009 2157
55 55.239 9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester 1.84 0.68 1.76 2167
55.244 2167
55.254 2167
56 55.389 Octadecanoic acid (or) Stearic acid 11.62 5.37 5.41 2173
55.394 2173
55.459 2176

Table 4.

Identification of neem seed (200 bar, 40, 50 and 60 °C) volatile compounds by GC–MS

Sl. no RT of sample Compound 200 bar (ppm) KI
40 50 60
1 4.023 Trichloromethane 4.73 744
4.879 778
2 4.078 Methane, oxybis[dichloro- 6.63 747
3 4.824 Desmethyldeprenyl 0.33 776
4 5.234 Difluorophosphoric acid 0.21 790
5 16.303 Butanoic acid 2.15 1010
6 21.795 Pyrazine, tetramethyl- 4.45 1094
7 23.056 Acetic acid, 2-(thiocarboxy)hydrazide, O-methyl ester 3.79 1118
8 23.326 4-Hexen-3-one, 4-methyl 3.80 1124
9 26.192 3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-methyl-1- 7.74 5.26 1182
26.202 (1-methylethyl)-, (R)- 1182
10 26.992 Octanoic acid 13.54 12.72 1197
27.143 1199
11 30.274 2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)- 6.55 1278
12 30.759 Nonanoic acid 9.20 13.47 1290
30.864 1292
13 31.935 2,4-Decadienal 13.99 3.37 1322
31.944 1322
14 32.16 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 6.39 1329
32.445 16.15 1337
32.705 15.60 1344
15 34.055 n-Decanoic acid 1.50 1382
16 35.911 1,3,6,10-Dodecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (Z,E) 11.29 1438
17 36.931 Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl- or α-Curcumene 7.13 1470
18 37.787 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,8a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1à,7á,8aà)]- 15.42 1496
19 38.257 β-Bisabolene 23.77 1511
20 38.622 6-Fluoro-2-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid, 2,3-dichlorophenyl ester 5.44 1524
21 39.087 Tetradecane, 1-iodo- 2.40 1540
22 40.593 4,6-Diethyl-1,2,3,5-tetrathiolane 5.33 1590
23 42.834 1-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethylidene)-, [1R-(1à,4aá,8aà)]- 141.82 1669
24 42.859 1H-Cycloprop[e]azulen-4-ol, decahydro-1,1,4,7-tetramethyl-, [1aR-(1aα,4β,4aβ,7α,7aβ,7bα)]- or viridiflorol 70.59 1670
25 43.739 Neoisolongifolene, 8-oxo- 2.32 1701
26 45.065 1-Iodoundecane 2.62 1751
27 45.82 Benzene, 1-[1,1-dimethylethyl]-4-[2-propenyloxy]- 1.86 1779
28 47.03 Heptasiloxane, hexadecamethyl- 10.25 1826
29 47.085 Isopropyl myristate 5.09 1828
30 49.601 Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, 7.54 14.70 1929
49.602 methyl ester 1929
31 50.677 Phthalic acid, butyl tridecyl ester 40.16 1974
32 50.752 n-Hexadecanoic acid 300.13 30.67 214.16 1977
50.812 1979
50.892 1982
33 51.227 Heptanoic acid, 2-ethyl- 3.11 1996
34 53.573 2-Tetradecyne 3.74 3.21 2097
53.588 2098
35 53.708 9-Dodecenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)- 9.55 2103
36 54.248 Hexasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- 11.40 2126
37 54.628 9-Decen-1-ol 5.38 2142
38 54.854 cis-Vaccenic acid or 11- 25.40 2151
54.854 Octadecenoic acid, (Z)- 2151
39 55.079 Spiro[2.5]octane 0.29 2160
40 55.239 Octadecanoic acid, 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl ester 20.43 2167
41 55.324 Octadecanoic acid 47.91 9.50 2170
55.329 2171
42 57.384 Hexasiloxane, tetradecamethyl- 7.91 2253
43 58.18 Naphthalene, decahydro-1-pentadecyl- 0.13 2285
44 60.346 Triphenyl phosphate 0.13 2368
45 63.607 Oxirane, hexadecyl 20.18 2487
46 65.663 1,1,1,3,5,7,7,7-Octamethyl-3,5-bis(trimethylsiloxy)tetrasiloxane 4.54
47 67.324 Dodecane, 1-cyclopentyl-4-(3-cyclopentylpropyl)- 3.26 2616

The major biologically active compounds of 100 bar, 40 °C of SCF extract are Terpinen-4-ol (0.44%), 2, 4-Decadienal (0.85%) (Zai-Chang et al. 2005), α-Cedrene (0.70%), Bicyclosesquiphellandrene (1%) (Aneja et al. 2005), Bicyclo [3.1.1] hept-2-ene, 2, 6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)- (2.1%) (Liu et al., 2011), Allyl isopropyl sulfide (2.9%) (Muhi-Eldeen et al. 2008), β-Sesquiphellandrene (0.37%) (Jayaprakasha et al. 2005), Cycloisolongifolene (0.49%) (da Silva et al. 2015), Guaia-1(10), 11-diene (3.42%), β-Bisabolene (3.27%), (−)-α-Panasinsen (0.36%), Isocaryophyllene (0.41%), trans-Sesquisabinene hydrate (0.39%), 1-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethylidene)-, [1R-(1α, 4aβ, 8aα)]- (5.1%), Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (3.95%), n- Hexadecanoic acid (23.66%), and Cis-Vaccenic acid (2.99%) (Huang et al. 2011). These above compound are biologically active as antifungal, anti-influenza, antimicrobial, and antioxidants. On the other hand, the majority of these compounds are absent in hydro-distillation of neem volatiles. Hydro-distilled neem seed volatile mainly comprises of 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl (43.91%), cycloeicosne (3.57%), n-Tetracosanol-1 (3.13%), E-15-Heptadecenal (4.07%), 1-Hexadecanol (4.51%) and others (Table 5). As shown by the results, the composition of the SCF and hydro-distillation was significantly different.

Table 5.

Identification of neem seed (Hydro-distillation) volatile compounds by GC–MS

Sl.no RT (min) Compound RI (ppm)
1 7.135 1,3-Propanedithiol 844 3.46
2 23.531 Allyl mercaptan 1128 2.60
3 26.787 1-Dodecene 1193 1.35
4 28.353 4,6-Dimethyl-[1,2,3]trithiane 1231 4.58
5 31.344 1,3-Propanedithiol 1305 1.51
6 32.275 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1332 58.89
7 32.59 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1341 77.57
8 33.545 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1368 0.92
9 34.446 1-Hexadecanol 1393 9.64
10 34.566 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1396 2.34
11 35.416 1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, octahydro-3,8,8-trimethyl-6-methylene-, [3R-(3à,3aá,7á,8aà)]- 1423 0.75
12 35.951 Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene, 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)- 1439 3.50
13 36.366 γ-Muurolene 1452 1.19
14 36.977 Spiro[4.5]dec-7-ene, 1,8-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1α,4β,5α)]- 1471 2.51
15 37.197 5,6-Dihydro-2,4,6-triethyl-4H-1,3,5-dithiazine 1478 4.41
16 37.537 Cycloisolongifolene 1488 1.01
17 37.837 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,8a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1α,7β,8aα)]- 1497 4.88
18 38.307 á-Bisabolene 1513 3.84
19 38.712 Phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- 1527 9.60
22 40.088 1,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (E)- 1573 0.74
23 40.703 1-Hexadecanol 1593 16.89
24 42.919 1-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethylidene)-, [1R-(1α,4aβ,8aα)]- 1672 4.94
25 46.22 E-15-Heptadecenal 1794 15.23
26 47.056 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1827 13.75
27 47.646 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1850 14.72
28 47.821 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl- 1857 6.15
29 50.162 Oxacycloheptadec-8-en-2-one, (8Z) 1952 1.06
30 51.192 Cycloeicosane 1995 13.36
31 52.563 4,6-Diethyl-1,2,3,5-tetrathiolane 2054 1.52
32 55.734 n-Tetracosanol-1 2187 8.54
33 59.911 n-Tetracosanol-1 2351 3.20
34 63.782 9-Hexacosene 2493 1.13

It is found that in all nine experiments of SCF, higher levels of compounds having carboxylic acid functional groups (25–65%). At 100 bar, 40 °C, the volatile compounds were further classified as acids (30%), alcohols (6.42%), aldehyde (0.857%), alkane (0.46%), alkene (19.48%), ester (13.93%), lactone (0.35%), n-heterocycle (0.41%), oxime (0.57%), s-heterocycle (1.05%) and α, β-unsaturated ketone (1.45%). The presence of compounds of these entire functional groups make 100 bar, 40 °C is the suitable condition for extraction of neem seed volatile in comparison with other SCF parameters and hydro-distillation process.

Conclusion

Recently, supercritical fluid carbon dioxide is used for the extraction process of bioactive compounds to get near natural forms without any artifact formation. Neem seed powder was subjected to SCF at different pressure and temperatures. Extracts were partitioned to separate volatiles and were analyzed by GC–MS along with the volatiles extracted by conventional method. There is a significant effect of pressure and temperature on isolation of number of volatile compounds as well as retention of biological active compounds by SCF. Extraction at 100 bar, 40 °C showed forty volatile compounds corresponds to 92.39% of volatiles with the major of bioactive compounds such as Terpinen-4-ol, 1,2,4-Trithiolane, 3,5-diethyl, allyl isoprophylsulphide, Cycloisolongifolene, á-Bisabolene, (−)-α-Panasinsen, Isocaryophyllene, trans-Sesquisabinene hydrate, 1-Naphthalenol.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director of CSIR-CFTRI for providing facilities and encouragement. The first author Swapna sonale R. acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research, India for providing Senior Research Fellowship.

References

  1. Aneja M, Gianfagna TJ, Hebbar PK. Trichoderma harzianum produces nonanoic acid, an inhibitor of spore germination and mycelial growth of two cacao pathogens. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;67:304–307. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aromdee C, Sriubolmas N. Essential oil of the flowers of Azardirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae) J Sci Technol. 2006;28:115–119. [Google Scholar]
  3. Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee RK, Bandyopadhyay U. Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica) Curr Sci. 2002;82:1336–1345. [Google Scholar]
  4. da Silva CE, Minguzzi S, da Silva RC, Matos MF, Tofoli D, Carvalho JED, Simionatto E. Chemical composition and cytotoxic activity of the root essential oil from Jatropha ribifolia (Pohl) Baill (Euphorbiaceae) J Braz Chem Soc. 2015;26:233–238. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghimeray AK, Jin CW, Ghimire BK, Cho DH. Antioxidant activity and quantitative estimation of azadirachtin and nimbin in Azardirachta indica A. Juss grown in foothills of Nepal. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8:3084–3091. [Google Scholar]
  6. Grosso C, Ferraro V, Figueiredo AC, Barroso JG, Coelho JA, Palavra AM. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of volatile oil from Italian coriander seeds. Food Chem. 2008;111:197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrero M, Mendiola JA, Cifuentes A, Ibáñez E. Supercritical fluid extraction: recent advances and applications. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:2495–2511. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang CB, Alimova Y, Myers TM, Ebersole JL. Short-and medium-chain fatty acids exhibit antimicrobial activity for oral microorganisms. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56:650–654. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jayaprakasha GK, Rao LJM, Sakariah KK. Chemistry and biological activities of C. longa. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16:533–548. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jennings W, Shibamoto T. Qualitative analysis of flavor and fragrance volatiles by glass capillary gas chromatography. New York: Academic Press; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson S, Morgan ED. Supercritical fluid extraction of oil and triterpenoids from neem seeds. Phytochem Anal. 1997;8:228–232. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1565(199709/10)8:5<228::AID-PCA367>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kubra IR, Rao LJ. Effect of microwave drying on the phytochemical composition of volatiles of ginger. J Food Sci Technol. 2012;47:53–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02806.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu QM, Zhang DQ, Peng K, Peng WX. Deep analysis on bioindustry prospects of 40 °C volatiles of Cinnamomum camphora branches. In: Wu Y, editor. Key engineering materials. Zürich: Trans Tech Publications; 2011. pp. 266–271. [Google Scholar]
  14. Melwita E, Ju YH. Separation of azadirachtin and other limonoids from crude neem oil via solvent precipitation. Sep Purif Technol. 2010;74:219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Metherel AH, Taha AY, Izadi H, Stark KD. The application of ultrasound energy to increase lipid extraction throughput of solid matrix samples (flaxseed) Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2009;81:417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2009.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mongkholkhajornsilp D, Douglas S, Douglas PL, Elkamel A, Teppaitoon W, Pongamphai S. Supercritical CO2 extraction of nimbin from neem seeds—a modelling study. J Food Eng. 2005;71:331–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morgan ED. Azadirachtin, a scientific gold mine. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17:4096–4105. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mostafa K, Yadollah Y, Fatemeh S, Naader B. Comparison of essential oil composition of Carum copticum obtained by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction and hydrodistillation methods. Food Chem. 2004;86:587–591. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Muhi-Eldeen Z, Juma’a G, Al-Kaissi E, Nouri L. Antimicrobial activity of some new oxadiazole derivatives. Jordan J Chem. 2008;3:233–243. [Google Scholar]
  20. Olabinri BM, Adebisi JA, Odesomi OF, Olabinri PF, Adeleke GE. Experimental classification of the antioxidant capacity of the leaf, stem and root barks of Mengiferaindicaand A. indica. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8:2968–2972. [Google Scholar]
  21. O’shea MJ, Brushett DJ, Pollard DJ (2001) Neem Extracts Pty. Ltd. Azadirachtin extraction process. U.S. Patent 6:312–738
  22. Pourmortazavi SM, Hajimirsadeghi SS. Supercritical fluid extraction in plant essential and volatile oil analysis. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1163:2–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rashid A, Ahmad I, Iram S, Mirza JI, Rauf CA. Efficiency of different Neem (Azardirachta indica A. Juss) products against various life stages of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. Pak J Bot. 2004;36:881–886. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sankar KU. Studies on the physicochemical characteristics of volatile oil from pepper (Piper nigrum) extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide. J Sci Food Agric. 1989;48:483–493. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740480411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sawai S, Saito K. Triterpenoid biosynthesis and engineering in plants. Front plant Sci. 2011;2:25. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shivakumar S, Roy TK, Krishna Moorthy PN (2012) Headspace solid phase micro extraction and GC/MS analysis of the volatile components in seed and cake of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Chemical Bulletin of “POLITEHNICA” University of Timisoara 51:1
  27. Stahl E, Gerard D. Solubility behavior and fractionation of essential oils in dense carbon dioxide. Perfum Flavor. 1985;10:29–37. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zai-Chang Y, Bo-Chu W, Xiao-Sheng Y, Qiang W. Chemical composition of the volatile oil from Cynanchum stauntonii and its activities of anti-influenza virus. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2005;43:198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zarena AS, Manohar B, Udaya Sankar K. Optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of xanthones from mangosteen pericarp by response surface methodology. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:1181–1188. doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0404-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES