COMPARISON OF ANTI BACTERIAL EFFICACY OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY AND DOXYCYCLINE ON AGGREGATIBACTER ACTINOMYCETEMCOMITANS

Abstract

Background:

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.actinomycetemcomitans) is an anaerobic bacterium has been frequently associated with aggressive periodontitis. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a medical treatment to prevent infection progression that utilizes light to activate a photosensitizing agent. Doxycycline is an antibacterial having photosensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate potential doxycycline as an antibacterial and photosensitizer combine PDT against A.actinomycetemcomitans bacteria.

Material and methods:

Samples were distributed to 4 groups as follow: (1) Groups A treated with a diode laser, (2) Group B treated with doxycycline 0,1% and laser, (3) Group C treated only with Doxycycline 0.1%, and (4) Group D no exposure doxycycline/laser. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at 5% significance level.

Results:

In this study, doxycycline 0.1% has the effect of reducing the bacterial viability of (59.60±3.26%). Whereas laser exposure 120 s combined with doxycycline produce the effect of bacterial viability reduction (88.50±2.83%) is not significantly different from the effect of laser 120 s exposure (88.79±2.60%). In clinical treatment, the application of laser exposure is generally at the duration of the exposure time of 30 s. The results of this study indicate that the duration of laser exposure 30 s shows a reduction in bacterial viability (44.91±1.69%) equal to the laser and with a combination of doxycycline and laser exposure (70.70±2.43%). So at low doses of laser exposure, doxycycline 0.1% combined with the laser results in the greatest reduction in bacterial viability, significantly different from laser exposure alone.

Conclusion:

at low doses of laser exposure (30s with energy 3.68 J/cm²), doxycycline 0.1% combined with the laser results in the greatest reduction in bacterial viability, significantly different with laser exposure alone.

Introduction

Aggressive periodontitis is an infectious disease its association rapidly progressing. These patients require treatment to prevent further progression of the disease and tissue damage. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.actinomycetemcomitans) has an important key to the development of aggressive periodontitis (Lai et al., 2013). A. actinomycetemcomitans has several virulence factors to invade epithelial cells, resisting phagocytosis, and produce leukotoxin and cytolethal descending toxin (Curtis et al., 2011)

Scaling and root planning has been regarded as a standard treatment for periodontitis. However, the treatments cannot produce clinical improvement, especially in cases of advanced disease and periodontal pockets inside, due to no considerable changes in subgingival microbial composition and they do not have to target specific bacterial species. Actinomyces species was the first bacteria that colonized after scaling and root planning procedure, then continuing by higher numbers and a larger proportion of pathogenic bacteria from red and orange group bacteria by slower recolonization (Brayton et al., 2002). Mechanical debridement leaves a large number of pathogenic microorganisms in relatively inaccessible areas, and cause a disturbance on subgingival flora.

Treatment of periodontitis using local antibiotics was intended as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment and to kill pathogenic bacteria from subgingival and extra crevicular niches. Various methods used as antimicrobial agents include rinsing, irrigation, systemic administration, and local applications using the sustained and controlled delivery (Sgolastra et al., 2013). Systemic administration allows antimicrobial agents to reach all periodontal and oral sites. However, the drug effect in the periodontal pocket is relatively low and raises the risk of side effects on non-oral sites of the body. Drugs may also be used as mouth rinses and for subgingival irrigation, but the depth of drugs penetration to the periodontal pocket is limited. Oral irrigation cannot facilitate drug penetration into the deepest area of the pocket. Self-irrigation may be limited by low patient compliance. Therefore, many studies have assessed the effect of local antiseptics and antibiotics only as adjunctive therapy for a periodontal case.

Local antimicrobial therapy is generally used during the maintenance phase to treat any remaining bacteria that isolated by the active pocket. Systemic antibiotics produce adverse drug reactions, uncontrolled patient compliance, and low drug concentrations in the subgingival sites. Local delivery is controlled from within the periodontal pocket.Single administration of antibacterial agent in small amount can maintain therapeutic concentrations in the gingival sulcus fluid for a longer period than other modes of delivery (de Melo et al., 2013). Doxycycline is a derivate of tetracycline, which is effective against A.actinomycetemcomitans. The A.actinomycetemcomitans has resistance 8.9% to doxycycline. Aggressive periodontitis is a progressive disorder of periodontal tissues, it is characterized by the rapid loss of connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone crushing on more than one permanent tooth. A.actinomycetemcomitans bacteria were the most dominant microorganisms found in patients with subgingival aggressive periodontitis bacteria and it is prevalent in Indonesia (Setiawatie et al., 2016).

Administration of local doxycycline produces anti-inflammation effects by inhibition of nuclear factor kappa β in the oral epithelium. Doxycycline can kill bacteria A.actinomycetemcomitans in the epithelial cells, and intracellular accumulation of doxycycline may combat invasive bacteria from the gingival epithelium (Moslemi et al., 2012). However, the disadvantage of doxycycline administration is photosensitivity effect on UV-A (Peacock et al., 2000). New treatments of periodontal disease are needed to prevent the progress of the infection. Doxycycline having photosensitivity effect may have a probability as a photosensitizer. Evaluation of the effective therapy was carried out as the advent of new technologies. Laser therapy, able to call by photodynamic therapy, is increasingly popular treatment, which offers an alternative and selective efficacy. Light therapy is based on the observation that periodontopathic bacteria capable of synthesizing chromophores, such as porphyrin. An in vitro study showed that blue light activation of the porphyrin caused structural damage in A.actinomycetemcomitans membranes and cause cell death. Illumination of the blue light laser (407-420 nm) was able to decrease bacterial growth after 24 hours (Séguier et al., 2010; Choi et al., 2012). This research aimed to evaluate potential doxycycline on A.actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 43718, USA) bacteria as photosensitizer combine PDT with the blue laser diode.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strain and Culture Condition

A strain bacteria was used Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 43718, USA) which grown on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) solution (Oxoid CM0131, UK). Isolate bacteria were taken 1 inoculating loop and placed on Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) solution (Merck Millipore, Germany). Culture was placed on anaerobic jar and saved on incubator CO₂ 37°C until formed suspense bacteria ~10¹⁰ CFU/ml or 0.5 McFarland Standard.

To determine the effect of the antibiotic on these A. actinomycetemcomitans, doxycycline dissolved in sterile water, or sterile water as a control, was injected into each tube and incubated for 30 min. A. actinomycetemcomitans was incubated in Petri dishes. was incubated in Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) supplemented with 0.5 % yeast extract in the microaerophilic atmosphere at 35ºC for 48 h to obtain strains at exponential growth phase. A. actinomycetemcomitans colony forming units (CFU) were inoculated into Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract, respectively. Then, 1 mL of CFU of each strain was aspirated with a disposable pipette from the dishes and the volume was dispersed in a sterile 10 mL tube, which was agitated in a tube agitator to spread bacterial strains. This tube was subjected to concentration analysis in a 640 nm spectrophotometer to reach a value between 0.08-0.1 nm corresponding to the final concentration of 1.5 x 108 UFC/mL. Suspense bacteria was taken 0.1 ml after the last dilution and placed on a petri dish and pour TSA solution. Petri dishes were placed on an anaerobic jar and saved on incubator CO₂ 37°C for 24 hours.

Materials

Doxycycline used in this research was water soluble doxycycline hydrochloride (Doxycycline hyclate; Sigma-Aldrich). Doxycycline 0.1% (w/v) was freshly prepared for each experiment. The absorption spectrum of doxycycline was characterized by UV-Vis spectrophotometer 1800 Shimadzu.

Apparatus Chamber for Illumination

Laser irradiations were carried out using diode lasers. Wavelength and power output will be shown on this result. The experiment design used 6 times exposure variations, 10s, 30s, 50s, 70s, 90s, and 120s.

Treatments

Samples were distributed to 4 groups as follow: (1) Groups A treated with a diode laser, (2) Group B treated with doxycycline 0.1% and laser, (3) Group C treated only with Doxycycline 0.1%, and (4) Group D no exposure doxycycline/laser. Samples were bacterial growth suspense and taken 1 ml on eppendorf. Each group of the experiment was repeated at least 4 times. The number of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) was then determined. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. A value of p≤0.05 was considered as a statistically significant difference. Percentage of decrease in the number of bacterial colonies growth defined as:

Results

This study used antibiotics doxycycline, which is generally indicated for people with the infection. However, in this study doxycycline is indicated as a photosensitizer diode laser as a bacterial inactivation agent. Therefore, doxycycline absorbance test using UV-Vis 1800 Series spectrophotometer to know the absorbance spectrum and the length of the wave match between doxycycline with diode laser wavelength were carried out. This absorption test is needed to determine the radiation that microorganisms receive through the absorption results (quantum yield). In this study, the laser used has a wavelength of 409 nm, then at that wavelength absorbance value is obtained which shows the absorbance relationship to the wavelength graph presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The absorption spectrum of doxycycline as in wavelength of 200 – 500 nm

Figure 2.

Mc Farland’s standard graph

Figure 1 showed the absorption spectrum of doxycycline. Based on the test results, it can be calculated the ratio of absorbance and transmission to determine the percentage of absorption (Quantum Yield) doxycycline, ie through the equation:

From the calculation, the results obtained that the percentage of doxycycline uptake at 409 nm wavelength is 99.98% which means that the greater the absorbance value of a sample the better the nature of the sample in the absorption. After the percentage of absorption was known, radiation calculations can be performed in Table 1, through the equation:

Table 1.

Irradiation data with time variation

LaserPower (W)	Area (cm2)	Wave length (nm)	Doxycycline Uptake	Time (s)	Radiation (J/cm2)
				10	1.228
				30	3.684
0.049502	0.403	409	0.999898 (99,98%)	50	6.140
				70	8.597
				90	11.053
				120	14.737

With R being radiation, P is potency to the radiation distance, A laser beam area, t the time variation used during irradiation, and Q is the quantum yield (% absorption).

Prior to laser diode irradiation of A.actinomycetemcomitans, it is necessary to establish Mc Farl and standard and perform a dilution standard of A.actinomycetemcomitans bacteria first. The results of standard Mc Farl and are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Data of Mc Farl and standard establishment

OD 595nm	Dilution to-	Sample				Average	CFU/ml	Log CFU/ml
		1	2	3	4
0.44	5	451	578	198	390	404.25	8.09x10-7	7.908
0.54	6	372	424	343	354	373.25	7.47x10-8	8.873
0.59	7	369	190	321	272	288	5.76x10-9	9.760
0.65	8	128	178	130	124	140	2.80x10-10	10.447

Based on Table 2, a Mc Farland standard chart is presented in Figure 3. The graph serves to measure bacterial density optically through ELISA Reader and compare it to the number of bacterial colonies in CFU / ml Log

Figure 3.

Bacterial viability in varying treatment of laser and doxycycline 0.1%

In Table 2 it is known that the average number of colonies of A.actinoycetemcomitans bacteria with 30-300 colonies requirement is found in the dilution factor of 10^-7 (7th dilution) with an OD value of 0.5. After the Mc Farland standard was known, furthermore the dilution standard of the A.actinoycetemcomitans bacteria established presented in Table 3. This dilution standard aims to determine on which dilution is reached the bacterial viability colonies ranges from 30-300 so that the results can be used as a comparison reference to the control group and the treatment group when irradiated using a diode laser.

Table 3.

Results of Dilution Standard of A.actinomycetemcomitans Bacteria

Dilution to-	Sample				Average	CFU/ml	Log CFU/ml
	1	2	3	4
10-5	445	329	418	401	398.25	7.97x107	7.90
10-6	335	395	431	399	390.00	7.80 x108	8.89
10-7	267	294	271	292	281.00	5.62 x109	9.75
10-8	148	118	101	132	124.75	2.50 x1010	10.39
10-9	81	83	97	68	82.25	1.65 x1011	11.21
10-10	68	56	47	53	56.00	1.12 x1012	12.04

In Table 3 it is known that the average number of bacterial colonies in the 7^th dilution is 281 colonies, a large number of bacteria is included in the good range of dilution because it is still within the range of 30-300 colonies so that the results obtained the standard dilution of A.actinomycetemcomitans is at the 7th dilution. After performing the Mc Farland standard and obtaining the standard bacterial dilution, the diode laser irradiation is carried out on A.actinomycetemcomitans.

Table 4 shows the viability of bacterial colonies in various treatments. Figure 3 shows the viability of bacterial colonies in various time of diode laser irradiation, with and without doxycycline. Irradiation of diode laser within 120±0,005s decreases the number of A.actinomycetemcomitans by 86.33±3.01%. The viability of bacteria decreases by 69.80±2.91% with the administration of doxycycline. Combination of diode laser irradiation with doxycycline cause the highest decrease in bacterial viability (88.93±2.50%).

Table 4.

The percentage reduction of bacterial viability in various treatments

Treatments group	Time ex-posure (s)	Laser intensi-ty (J/cm2)	Number of Colonies	CFU/ml	Log CFU/ml	% reduction of viability
Control	0	-	288	5.32E+09	9.726	0
	10	-	265.75	5.76E+09	9.760	0
	30	-	269.25	5.39E+09	9.731	0
	50	-	276.5	5.53E+09	9.743	0
	70	-	301.25	6.03E+09	9.780	0
	90	-	303	6.06E+09	9.782	0
	120	-	259.75	5.20E+09	9.716	0
Laser	0	0.000	275.5	5.51E+09	9.741	4.36
	10	1.228	157.75	3.16E+09	9.499	42.74
	30	3.685	151.75	3.04E+09	9.482	44.91
	50	6.141	148.5	2.97E+09	9.473	46.28
	70	8.598	142.25	2.85E+09	9.454	48.37
	90	11.055	84.5	1.69E+09	9.228	69.33
	120	14.740	35.5	7.10E+08	8.851	88.50
Doxy	0	-	224.25	4.49E+09	9.652	15.62
	10	-	123.5	2.47E+09	9.393	44.92
	30	-	114.25	2.29E+09	9.359	49.05
	50	-	110.75	2.22E+09	9.345	50.61
	70	-	96.25	1.93E+09	9.284	57.08
	90	-	91.5	1.83E+09	9.262	59.19
	120	-	90.5	1.81E+09	9.258	59.64
Laser + Doxy	0	0.000	250	5.00E+09	9.699	5.93
	10	1.228	104.25	2.09E+09	9.319	58.30
	30	3.684	73.25	1.47E+09	9.166	70.70
	50	6.140	57	1.14E+09	9.057	77.20
	70	8.597	56	1.12E+09	9.049	77.60
	90	11.053	53.75	1.08E+09	9.031	78.50
	120	14.737	28.75	5.75E+08	8.760	88.79

The irradiation was done by culturing the isolates of A.actinomycetemcomitans bacteria which were then incubated for 24 hours. For the treatment group, a 0.1% concentration of doxycycline antibiotic was added. Then the irradiation treatment using diode laser is started. At this stage, the sample consisted of 4 treatment groups. Each group consists of six time variations ie 10 s, 30 s, 50 s, 70 s, 90 s, and 120 s. The number of bacterial colonies obtained from diode laser transmission in A.actinomycetemcomitans bacteria presented in Figure 3.

Statistical analysis results in the significant difference between treatments (p<0.05). Group A (laser treatment) has different irradiation in 120 s and has most of decreased. It has a similar pattern to Group B (combine laser and doxycycline). The statistically significant decrease of CFU was found on the diode laser treatment group (Group A and Group B) (p<0.05) compared to the control group. Tukey post hoc test results show that exposure of diode laser with the irradiation time of 120±0.005s produced the highest decrease in the number of A.actinomycetemcomitans 88.79%. It is not significantly different with laser treatment at 120 s. Table 5 shows the results of ANOVA factorial test of the treatments.

Table 5.

The results of ANOVA factorial test and post hoc of the treatments

Factor	Grup	N	% reduction of bacterial viability		ANOVA Factorial test
			average	SD	Sig	conclusion
Laser	Laser 10 s(a)	4	42.74	5.49	p = 0.000	Significant difference
	Laser s 30 s (ab)	4	44.91	1.69
	Laser 50 s(ab)	4	46.28	1.90
	Laser 70 s (ab)	4	48.37	4.28
	Laser 90 s (abc)	4	69.33	3.61
	Laser 120 s (c)	4	88.50	2.83
	Total	72	61.76	3.26
Doxy 0.1%	Doxy 10 s (ab)	4	44.92	2.50	p = 0.000	Significant difference
	Doxy 30 s (ab)	4	49.05	3.95
	Doxy 50 s (ab)	4	50.61	3.97
	Doxy 70 s (abc)	4	57.08	3.05
	Doxy 90 s (abc)	4	59.19	3.93
	Doxy 120 s (abc)	4	59.64	3.62
	Total	72	61.76	3.26
	Laser+Doxy 10 s (abc)	4	58.30	3.05	p = 0.000	Significant difference
	Laser+Doxy 30 s (abc)	4	70.70	2.43
	Laser+Doxy 50 s (abc)	4	77.20	2.03
Laser Doxy 0.1%	Laser+Doxy 70 s (abc)	4	77.60	2.82
	Laser+Doxy 90 s (bc)	4	78.50	1.70
	Laser+Doxy 120 s (c)	4	88.79	2.60
	Total	72	61.76	19.26

Discussion

Antibiotics such as doxycycline have been shown to inhibit several matrix metalloproteinases in addition to its antimicrobial activity (Hanem et al., 1998; Ryan et al., 1998; Chang et al., 2010). Doxycycline has disadvantage during treatment because it will be lead photosensitivity on UV-A or 350nm-400nm (Goetze et al., 2017). However, our result has the absorbance of doxycycline reach 410 nm before falling down. It will be an advantage when PDT is combined with the antibiotic. Doxycycline also is known to disrupt the function of mitochondria (Moullan et al., 2015) and produces oxygen species that play a role in the activation procollagenases and progelatinases in vitro (Ramamurthy et al., 1993, Smith et al, 1996). Doxycycline modulates other cellular functions, including proliferation and matrix remodeling (Franco et al., 2006). Our result on treatment provides group doxycycline treatment give decreased more than the control group. Topically administered of doxycycline 0,1% has been used for the treatment of periodontitis without adverse or side effects reaction. Doxycycline appears to be a promising photosensitizer in PDT. This study showed the possibility to kill A.actinomycetemcomitans in vitro by using topically applied doxycycline 0,1% combination with 408 nm diode laser. Doxycycline used at therapeutic concentrations do not have toxicity but after laser exposure, they show phototoxicity. This behavior is caused by their photodegradation products and their reactive nature. The mechanism of cellular damage is associated with an increase of oxidation in biomacromolecules such as albumin (BSA) and RNase A, the cellular damage via oxidation of specific aromatic amino acids. Photoaffinity of studied compounds for albumin and others proteins is related to the different lipophilic proprieties shown for the seven tetracyclines derivatives. Doxycycline is the most phototoxic compound of the series tetracycline (Fuoco, 2015)

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) utilizes visible light (laser) and dye (photosensitizer), which produce free oxygen radicals to selectively destroy bacteria and their by-products. PDT combines non-toxic photoactive dyes and harmless visible light to produce singlet oxygen and free radicals to kill microbial cells. The effectiveness of PDT as assessed by previous studies has been focusing on various microorganisms and photosensitizers. Studies of the susceptibility of A.actinomycetemcomitans to lethal photosensitization in vitro have reported that the organism can be killed with low concentrations of methylene blue and low light energy doses. Methylene blue caused 64% bacterial reduction, therefore seen to be less efficient on A.actinomycetemcomitans (Lang et al., 2009). A more recent study using photosensitizers based on porphyrin skeleton and a red laser showed only 62% reduction of A.actinomycetemcomitans (Andriankaja et al., 2010).

In this study, doxycycline 0.1% has the effect of reducing the bacterial viability of (59.60±3.26%). Whereas laser exposure 120 s combined with doxycycline produce the effect of bacterial viability reduction (88.50±2.83%) is not significantly different from the effect of laser 120 s exposure (88.79±2.60%). In clinical treatment, the application of laser exposure is generally at the duration of the exposure time of 30s. The results of this study indicate that the duration of laser exposure 30 s shows a reduction in bacterial viability (44.91±1.69%) equal to the laser and with a combination of doxycycline and laser exposure (70.70±2.43%). So at low doses of laser exposure, doxycycline 0.1% combined with the laser results in the greatest reduction in bacterial viability, significantly different from laser exposure alone.

Photodynamic Inactivation (PDI) is a method for inactivation in microbes. The combination of light and certain photosensitizer in PDI will cause photoinactivation in bacteria (Wardle, 2009), ie inhibition of cell metabolic activity due to cytoplasmic membrane damage due to peroxidation by reactive oxygen (Hamblin & Hasan, 2003). Photoinactivation mechanism involves the process of photosensitization, which is the process of light absorption by photosensitizer molecules which further activate the chemical reaction produces various species of reactive oxygen. Photosensitization depends on the type and quantity of photosensitizer acting as light-absorbing molecules (Nitzan et al., 2004) and the suitability of the light spectrum with the photosensitivity absorptive spectrum (Papageorgiou et al., 2000). At the molecular level due to irradiation begins with a photophysical event of light absorption which further activates photosensitizer molecules, followed by photochemical reactions that produce various species of reactive oxygen (Plaetzer et al., 2009). Reactive oxygen causes lipid peroxidation in cell, lysis or inactivation of membrane transport systems in these bacterial cells, and bacterial cell damage (Hamblin & Hasan, 2003).

The success of photodynamic therapy depends on the suitability of the light source wavelength spectrum with the photosensitizer absorption spectrum. In this study the absorption spectrum of doxycycline at 408 nm, while the laser light source used 409 nm. So doxycycline as photosensitizer able to absorb (quantum yield) the laser light energy 99.99%. Bacterial reduction differs depending on the quantum yield density of photosensitizer.To determine effective dose treatment of PDT is difficult because concentration photosensitizer and light absorption have certain measurement (Hegge et al., 2012). High light energy may be not enough to decreased bacteria caused quantum molecular process.The lower light energy doses used (6 and 12 J), the extent of bacterial killing increased markedly as the photosensitizer concentration increased. The results imply that even at the lowest light energy dose used (6 J), enough photons were being supplied to activate all of the photosensitizer molecules present (resulting from the application of 0,1% of doxycycline to release sufficient ROS) to enable the killing of most (approximately 90%) bacteria present. The killing of bacteria with the light energy dose was limited by the concentration of the photosensitizer at the site or, more strictly, its ROS-generating capacity.

Local antimicrobial agents should be applied in the treatment of periodontitis (Bernhart et al., 2016). However, it is difficult to maintain the level of therapeutic agents for a long time due to elution agent by the gingival crevicular fluid. To resolve this problem, fiber insertion, strip, and resorbable cellulose that release agent slowly into the periodontal pocket have been used (Kim et al., 2015). Biodistribution of topically applied doxycycline on the gingival structures showed penetration by photosensitizer throughout the epithelium. Following subsequent illumination, the photodynamic effect was limited to the epithelium. When the highest concentration was used, the most intense fluorescence throughout the epithelial layer is observed, but the intensity of fluorescence in the connective tissue is very low. Penetration throughout the epithelium and connective tissues may be important, as periodontopathogens can infiltrate through the epithelial barrier into the connective tissue (Marchetti et al., 2012). PDT can possibly eliminate bacteria that have migrated to the tissue. The use of PDT is not affected by such problem, since the photosensitizer administration into periodontal pocket only needs a short time; maybe minutes or even seconds, depending on light source intensity used (Gursoy et al., 2013)This study showed that 0.1% of doxycycline reduces the number of A.actinomycetemcomitans below detectable level within only 30 s exposure. Compared to conventional therapy, adjunctive therapy encompasses new technologies and office procedures such as light and laser therapy, photodynamic therapy. The demand for adjunctive therapy arises from the desire for more effective and quicker therapy.

Conclusions

In this study, doxycycline 0.1% has the effect of reducing the bacterial viability of (59.60±3.26%). Whereas laser exposure 120 s combined with doxycycline produce the effect of bacterial viability reduction (88.50±2.83%) is not significantly different from the effect of laser 120 s exposure (88.79±2.60%). In clinical treatment, the application of laser exposure is generally at the duration of the exposure time of 30s. The results of this study indicate that the duration of laser exposure 30 s shows a reduction in bacterial viability (44.91±1.69%) equal to the laser and with a combination of doxycycline and laser exposure (70.70±2.43%). So at low doses of laser exposure, doxycycline 0.1% combined with the laser results in the greatest reduction in bacterial viability, significantly different from laser exposure alone.