Abstract
Photoreconfigurable and photodegradable polymeric networks have broad utility as functional biomaterials for many applications in medicine and biotechnology. The vast majority of these functional polymers are synthesized using chemical moieties that may be cytotoxic in vitro. Materials synthesized from these substituents also pose unknown risk upon implantation and thus will encounter significant regulatory challenges prior to use in vivo. This work describes a strategy to prepare photodegradable hydrogel networks that are composed of well-characterized synthetic polymers and natural melanin pigments found within the human body. Self-assembled networks of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide)-poly(ethylene glycol) ABA triblock copolymers are doped with melanin nanoparticles to produce reconfigurable networks based on photothermal phase transitions. Self-assembled hydrogel networks with melanin nanoparticles exhibit a storage modulus ranging from 1.5 ± 0.6 kPa to 8.0 kPa ± 7.5 as measured by rheology. The rate of UV-induced photothermal heating was non-monotonic and varied as a function of melanin nanoparticle loading. A maximum steady state temperature increase of 20.5 ± 0.30 °C was measured. Experimental heating rates were in close agreement with predictions based on attenuation of light in melanins via photothermal absorption and Mie scattering. The implications of melanin nanoparticles on hydrogel network formation and light-induced disintegration were also characterized by rheology and dynamic light scattering. Taken together, this class of photoreconfigurable hydrogels represents a potential strategy for photodegradable polymers with increased likelihood for clinical translation.
1. Introduction
Photodegradable polymers are an emerging class of biomaterials that exhibit broad utility in many applications including regenerative medicine and controlled release1–3. Light can serve as a mild, benign stimulus to manipulate polymeric networks that are loaded with bioactive agents such as peptides, proteins, and cells4, 5. Hydrogel networks with photolabile chemistries permit spatiotemporal control of in situ structure formation and actuation5, 6. There are several established strategies to confer photodegradability in polymeric networks. Hydrogels can be synthesized with photolabile functional groups as pendant groups or within the polymer backbone2, 4. Photolabile chemistries include nitrobenzyl derivatives2, 5, 7, coumarins8, 9, and triazine-polyacrylates10. Many photolabile chemistries leverage photorearrangement reactions11, 12. The composition of these functional polymeric biomaterials is suitable for applications as model in vitro environments for elucidating cell-materials interactions13, 14. However, the evolution of potentially cytotoxic by-products through reactions including uncaging may limit widespread use as a functional medical material for use in clinical applications15. Towards this end, progress in the field is motivated by: (1) designing photolabile polymers with photoresponsive groups that exhibit reduced cytotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo13, 16; (2) synthesis of polymer-nanoparticle networks composed of thermoresponsive hydrogel networks doped with photothermal sensitizers17, 18. Incorporating photothermal sensitizers can provide increased functionality including reconfigurability17, 19. Hydrogels with lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior loaded with gold nanomaterials have been used in light-controlled actuation of microstructures and controlled release of biomolecules20–22. Physically crosslinked hydrogel networks composed of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA) exhibit LCST behavior23, 24, are thermally reconfigurable, and its cytotoxicity has been well studied in numerous contexts25–29. This report describes a strategy to transform self-assembled PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA hydrogels into photoreconfigurable networks by incorporating biologically-derived melanin nanoparticles (MelNP) as efficient photothermal sensitizers.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of aqueous melanin nanoparticle dispersions
Natural eumelanin extracts from Sepia officinalis (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA) were used as received. Feature dimensions were measured from scanning electron micrographs (Philips XL-30 FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Samples were coated with 4 nm layer of platinum before imaging (Emtech K575X, Quorum Technologies, Guelph, ON, Canada). Aqueous dispersions of MelNP were prepared by ultrasonication of eumelanins in Milli-Q water (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) at 30% amplitude, pulsing every 15 seconds for a total of 20 minutes with the tapered 0.125" microtip (Cole-Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The size distribution of MelNP was measured immediately after ultrasonication via dynamic light scattering (DLS; Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK).
2.2. Photothermal heating of aqueous melanin dispersions
The concentration-dependent heating rate of aqueous dispersions of MelNP was measured using thermal imaging. Briefly, aqueous solutions of MelNP at prescribed concentrations were loaded into scintillation vials and the solution depth was recorded. The apical surfaces of dispersions were continuously exposed to incident UV light (Imax at λ = 365 nm) at total intensities of 10.8 mW-m−2 (Black-Ray UV, UVP, Upland, CA). Solution temperatures were recorded using a thermal camera (IRXP-5000, SPi infrared, Las Vegas, NV, USA) at predetermined time points until a steady-state temperature was attained. Control samples were composed of aqueous solutions without MelNP.
2.3. Preparation and rheological characterization of physically crosslinked hydrogels
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA-PEG-PLGA, 1000-1000-1000 g-mol−1 ; lactide:glycolide ratio 25:75) (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA) was used as received. Aqueous hydrogel precursor solutions (20% w/v) were prepared by dissolving 200 mg of PLGA-PEG-PLGA into 1 mL of Milli-Q H2O. The solution was incubated at 4 °C for 18 hr. PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel networks were formed in situ on a Peltier plate of a rheometer in parallel plate configuration (TA Instruments DHR-3, New Castle, DE, USA). Hydrogels were prepared from 0.25 mL of the solution within a gap of 1000 µm at a preset temperature of 37 °C. A temperature sweep was performed from 5—75 °C with a step interval of 2 °C and equilibration time of 180 sec at each measurement point. Rheological experiments were performed using a strain amplitude of γ = 0.5% and a frequency of ω = 5 rad-s−1. These parameters ensured that mechanical properties of hydrogels were measured in the linear viscoelastic regime (See Supporting Information). The data was processed using a local regression using weighted linear least squares and a 2nd degree polynomial model with a MATLAB function (LOESS)30.
2.4. Preparation and characterization of photosensitized physically crosslinked hydrogels
Physically crosslinked hydrogels photosensitized with MelNP were prepared in a similar manner as previously described. Briefly, aqueous dispersions of MelNP at prescribed concentrations (50 µg-mL−1 to 20 mg-mL−1) were prepared via ultrasonication and homogenized with aqueous solutions of PLGA-PEG-PLGA. Polymer and MelNP size distribution were characterized by DLS at three distinct temperatures, 25, 37, and 45 °C. Hydrogel formation was induced by heating to 37 °C in a water bath. The gel was transferred to a quartz plate on the rheometer equipped with UV irradiation accessory (Exfo Omnicure S2000, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels loaded with MelNP was then exposed to UV light (maximum intensity, Imax at λ = 365 nm; total intensity of 70.4 mW-m−2). The storage (G’) and loss (G’’) modulus were measured as a function of irradiation time. Frequency sweeps were conducted at strain amplitudes of γ = 0.5% for values of ω between 0.1 and 100 rad-s−1 at a temperature of 37 °C. All data presented as mean ± standard deviation where appropriate.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Melanin nanoparticles are efficient biologically-derived photothermal sensitizers
Melanins are a broad class of ubiquitous pigments that are found in many organisms in the fungi, plant, and animal kingdoms31–34. Eumelanins, a sub-class of melanins, are composed of polyaromatic indole derivatives and heterogeneous superstructures that condense into nanoparticles31, 32, 35. The combination of chemical and structural properties produce many unique physical properties including heavy metal ion chelation36, hydration-dependent semiconducting electron transport behavior37 and broadband UV absorption38, 39. Another unique consequence of this structure is photon-phonon conversion with near ideal efficiency38, 40, 41. The abundance of eumelanins in biological systems coupled with the native nanoscale morphology and unique photon-phonon interactions suggest it will serve as an efficient dopant to confer photoreconfigurability in thermally sensitive hydrogel networks. This material may be suitable as an in situ forming hydrogel for applications in wound healing, tissue regeneration, or endovascular applications. The toxicity of melanins used in these applications has been previously evaluated42, 43. The proposed mechanism for UV-induced photothermal phase transitions in MelNP-loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels is shown in Fig. 1. Micelle formation of pristine PLGA-PEG-PLGA has been characterized previously23, 24, 28, 44. Here, the adsorption process of micelles in the presence of MelNP is highlighted. Physical crosslinks are formed as the temperature increases above the sol-gel transition 11,17,18. UV irradiation of MelNP-doped hydrogels generates local heating and network disruption via precipitate formation.
Natural eumelanin (hereby referred to as melanins for simplicity) is composed of polydisperse nanoparticles with diameters between 80 and 270 nm, as determined by SEM and analyzed by NIH ImageJ (Fig. 2). Aqueous dispersions of melanin nanoparticles (MelNP) indicate a narrow size distribution centered about DMelNP = 200 nm as determined by DLS. Size distributions determined by DLS were largely independent of MelNP concentration, which suggests that MelNP dispersions were resistant to transient flocculation (Fig. 2b). Particle diameters measured by DLS may represent as overestimation due to rotation diffusion of non-spherical melanin nanoparticles to the correlation function. This phenomenon has been observed previously in pristine gold nanoparticles or carbon nanotubes45, 46.
3.2 Photothermal heating rates of aqueous melanin suspensions is non-monotonic
The characteristic size of MelNP suggests that attenuation of incident UV irradiation is governed by two processes. Absorption contributes to heating of optically transparent PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel networks, while scattering reduces the incident intensity without contributing to local heating. MelNP can participate in both of these processes by virtue of the high photon-phonon conversion efficiency 40 and the characteristic particle dimensions47. Aqueous dispersions of MelNP achieve steady-state temperature profiles within 20 min of continuous irradiation (Fig. 3a). The increase in steady state temperature of aqueous MelNP dispersions varied non-monotonically with the concentration of MelNP (Fig. 3b). The largest increase in steady state dispersion temperature (ΔT = +20.5 °C) was observed for MelNP concentrations of 1 mg-mL−1, which represents a relative increase of +14.0 °C compared to UV-induced heating of pristine hydrated PLGA-PEG-PLGA (Figure S8, Supporting Information). The steady state temperature of aqueous MelNP dispersions was predicted by balancing heating from UV absorption (Qin) with heat loss that is dominated by conduction (Qout).
Eqn. 1 |
In this equation, mi and Cp,i represent the mass and heat capacity of component i, T represents the temperature of the aqueous dispersion. The rate of energy supplied was calculated as the one-dimensional differential of the absorbed light intensity.
Eqn. 2 |
In this equation, I(z) represents the intensity of light at a given depth z and Qin(z) represents the local heating rate at a given depth z. It was assumed that none of the light was transmitted, which is a reasonable conclusion based on the macroscopic observations that MelNP dispersions are non-transparent. The absorbed light intensity is calculated using the following relationship derived from the Beer-Lambert law48, 49.
Eqn. 3 |
In the expression, I0 is the incident light intensity at z = 0 measured experimentally by a radiometer and β is the scattering coefficient estimated from Mie scattering50. The value of β was estimated using concentration-dependent parameters from DLS measurements (Fig. 2b). The mass density and refractive index of MelNP were set at 1.68 g-cm−3 and 1.3, respectively35, 38, 41. The rate of heat loss Qout is governed by one-dimensional steady state conduction via the following equation.
Eqn. 4 |
In this expression, kSiO2 represents the heat transfer coefficient of silicon oxide (1 W-m−1-K−1)51, S is the surface area of conduction and rshell is the coordinate within the silicon oxide shell between the inner (Rin) and outer radii (Rout) of the conduction path where |Rout – Rin| << Rin. The resulting prediction for steady state temperatures of aqueous MelNP dispersions was matched experimental data for all concentrations of MelNP in this study (Fig. 3; Supporting Information). A representative plot of temperature profiles is shown in Fig. 3a. The predicted transient temperature profiles of aqueous MelNP dispersions more closely matched that of experimentally determined values at low concentrations of MelNP (≤ 1 mg-mL−1). However, the temporal temperature profiles deviated significantly from experimental observations as the MelNP concentration was increased. This may be attributed to an increase in natural convection that may evolve both thermal and density gradients (ρMelNP = 1.68 g-cm−3 > ρH2O = 1 g-cm−3).
3.2. Melanin nanoparticle photosensitizers can alter the phase transition behavior of physically crosslinked hydrogels
Rheological measurements of PLGA-PEG-PLGA triblock copolymer hydrogels (200 mg-mL−1) formed with MelNP (1 mg-mL−1) across temperatures ranging from 5 to 75 °C is shown in Fig. 4. The three phases of interest are defined as sol, gel, and precipitate. The increase in storage modulus and loss modulus was inferred as the sol-gel point, while the decrease indicated the gel-precipitate transition52–54. These experiments were repeated at several other polymer concentrations to construct the phase diagram for hydrogel with 1 mg-mL−1 MelNP (Fig. 5a). The phase diagram for pristine PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel without MelNP was also constructed in a similar method (Fig. 5b) and was comparable to phase behaviors observed in other studies24, 28, 44. The addition of MelNP impacts the temperature of sol-gel transitions. Sol-gel transition temperatures of PLGA-PEG-PLGA solutions (200 mg-mL−1) are reduced when MelNP are added at concentrations of 1 mg-mL−1. The observed offset in sol-gel transition temperatures was a strong function of the PLGA-PEG-PLGA concentration (Supporting Information; Fig. S2). Including MelNP into PLGA-PEG-PLGA networks generally expands the temperature range of the sol phase compared to pristine networks. This shift in the phase diagram can be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of the aromatic substituents32, 40. MelNP can act as hydrophobic nodes to accelerate gelation and retard precipitation. The driving force for phase transitions of triblock PLGA-PEG-PLGA is driven by the hydrophobicity of the system, provided by the PLGA blocks24, 28. The temperature range of the gel phase was expanded by increasing PLGA content in the triblock copolymers28 by reducing (elevating) the temperature of sol-gel (gel-precipitate) transitions. Similar phase behavior was observed in the MelNP loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA system in this study. The addition of MelNP may serve as hydrophobic nodes that increase micelle bridging.
The gelation mechanism through micelle bridging was also inferred from DLS measurements. Analysis of the correlation function estimated the number fraction of two populations of colloids structures: (1) Rg between 34—52 nm, PLGA-PEG-PLGA micelles (Supporting Information); and (2) Rg between 61—412 nm (Fig. 6). Increasing the temperature to 37 °C abolishes population (1) and induces the formation of aggregates with larger Rg in the range of 600—1000 nm (Fig.6). These data suggest that both micelle bridges and possible flocculated MelNP are present23, 24, 28. This peak shifted towards smaller values of Rg as the temperature is increased to 45 °C. This peak shift can be attributed to micelle consolidation due to overhydrophobicity that has been previously observed in pristine PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel networks23, 24, 28.
3.3. Photothermal modulation of hydrogel networks with loaded melanin nanoparticle photosensitizers
The temporal evolution of G’ and G’’ of MelNP-loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel networks under UV irradiation is shown in Fig.7. The storage modulus declines rapidly within the first 200 sec of UV irradiation and reach plateau. This was inferred as the phase transition53, 54 as also observed in Fig.4. These data suggest that MelNP-loaded PLGA-PEG-PLGA networks undergo a rapid sol-precipitate phase transition. Light-induced sol-precipitate phase transitions are made possible through the addition of MelNP photosensitizers. Disintegration of pristine PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels by UV irradiation is unattainable otherwise at this intensity.
The storage modulus was measured for PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels prepared from MelNP concentrations ranging from 50 µg-mL−1 to 5 mg-mL−1 and compared with the modulus of hydrogels without MelNP (1.0 kPa ± 1.8). The storage modulus increases from 1.5 ± 0.6 kPa to 8.0 ± 7.5 kPa with increasing MelNP concentrations (Fig. 8). Melanins exhibit a Young’s modulus of 1.57 GPa55. Although the observed increase in G’ may be due to the inclusion of a rigid component as demonstrated in other nanoparticle-polymer composites56, the volume fraction (estimated at ϕMelNP = 0.0036% to 0.3% for cMelNP from 50 µg-mL−1 to 5 mg-mL−1) of melanins in this system is not sufficient to impact G’ by this mechanism. MelNP concentrations ≥10 mg-mL−1 prevented gel formation in PLGA-PEG-PLGA networks that are heated to 37 °C. Hydrophobic MelNP are suspected to influence network formation in aqueous environments via competitive adsorption of PLGA-PEG-PLGA triblock copolymers. The relative partitioning of triblocks between hydrogel formation and MelNP adsorption are estimated using thermodynamic calculations. The Gibb’s free energy of PLGA-PEG-PLGA gelation ΔGgel was estimated to be -6.1 J-mL−1 on a volume basis57. The free energy of adsorption of PLGA-PEG-PLGA to MelNP in aqueous environments on a per area basis (ΔGads) was estimated by the Good-Girifalco-Fowkes equation58.
Eqn. 5 |
The values of γpolymer, γMelNP , and γwater were 40, 44, and 71.4 mJ-m−2, respectively59. The value of ΔGads,surf was calculated to be -9.0 mJ-m−2. The free energy of adsorption ΔGads,vol per volume was calculated as a function of MelNP concentrations.
Eqn. 6 |
This value was calculated by estimating the surface area of a single MelNP (SAMelNP) and the number density of MelNP in solution (NMelNP), where the average melanin diameter (DMelNP) was taken as 200 nm (Fig. 2b). Spontaneous gelation of physically crosslinked PLGA-PEG-PLGA networks was observed for MelNP concentrations of 5 mg-mL−1 or lower since gelation of PLGA-PEG-PLGA networks is thermodynamically favorable to MelNP adsorption (ΔGads,vol < ΔGgel). As the concentration of MelNP was increased to ≥10 mg-mL−1, MelNP adsorption becomes energetically favorable compared to network gelation (ΔGads,vol > ΔGgel). This calculation is consistent with the trends in gelation versus MelNP concentration (Supporting Information; Table S2).
Physically crosslinked PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels sensitized with MelNP represent a photoreconfigurable hydrogel composition with the potential for rapid clinical translation. PLGA-PEG-PLGA has been used as a material in many medical devices24, 26, 27, 44. Melanin is a naturally occurring compound that also exhibits many beneficial qualities including chelation of heavy metals and free radical scavenging60. Photoreconfigurable hydrogel compositions described in this work may be suitable for use as injectable hydrogels that can be manipulated after gelation using UV irradiation with optical instruments, although it still faces challenges associated with this class of light-responsive materials including the lack of UV penetration and damage from UV light. Although biocompatibility profiles of the individual components have been characterized in various contexts, the combination of MelNP and PLGA-PEG-PLGA may face additional regulatory challenges.
Hydrogels with embedded MelNP exhibit increased photosensitivity, thereby enabling light-inducible gel-precipitate phase transitions. MelNP may be used to confer photoreconfigurability of other hydrogel network compositions that exhibit LCST behavior including poly(N-isopropylacrlyamide)61–63. Transient hydrogel networks with MelNP may also serve as temporary materials to protect tissue from harmful UV irradiation during surgical procedures that use high intensity light. The temperature range needed to achieve phase transition of these hydrogels (Fig.5) is comparable to widely accepted range for hyperthermia (40 °C-50 °C)64–66. The condition for photothermal heating can also be altered by varying concentrations of MelNPs, the composition of PLGA-PEG-PLGA, and the intensity of UV irradiation for appropriate applications.
4. Conclusions
Photoreconfigurable physically crosslinked PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels doped with biologically-derived melanin nanoparticle photosensitizers represent a strategy to achieve light-inducible disintegration of polymer networks with benign chemistries. The heating rate and steady state temperatures of aqueous dispersions of MelNP irradiated with UV is non-monotonic and can be predicted by considering Beers law and Mie scattering. Aqueous MelNP dispersions impact sol-gel phase transitions and network formation due to the presence of hydrophobic domains that can preferentially adsorb amphiphilic PLGA-PEG-PLGA network precursors. These considerations determine the relative parameter space for polymer and MelNP concentrations that can form photoreconfigurable hydrogel networks. Taken together, this work provides a framework for engineering a new class of light-responsive polymeric biomaterials for potential use in biomedical applications.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Funding provided by the following organizations: the Berkman Foundation; the Shurl and Kay Curci Foundation; the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (ACS PRF #51980-DNI7); the National Institutes of Health (NIH; R21EB015165); the American Heart Association (AHA 12SDG12050297). Thermal and mechanical characterization was performed at the Carnegie Mellon University Thermomechanical Characterization Suite. The authors would also like to thank the Colloids, Polymers, and Sciences Laboratory at Carnegie Mellon University for assistance in light scattering measurements.
References
- 1.Han D, Tong X, Zhao Y. Macromolecules. 2011;44:437–439. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pasparakis G, Manouras T, Argitis P, Vamvakaki M. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2012;33:183–198. doi: 10.1002/marc.201100637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Narayanan RP, Melman G, Letourneau NJ, Mendelson NL, Melman A. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:2465–2471. doi: 10.1021/bm300707a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim J, Hayward RC. Trends in Biotechnology. 2012;30:426–439. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kloxin AM, Kasko AM, Salinas CN, Anseth KS. Science. 2009;324:59–63. doi: 10.1126/science.1169494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thomas SW. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics. 2012;213:2443–2449. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramanan VV, Katz JS, Guvendiren M, Cohen ER, Marklein RA, Burdick JA. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2010;20:8920–8926. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maddipatla MVSN, Wehrung D, Tang C, Fan W, Oyewumi MO, Miyoshi T, Joy A. Macromolecules. 2013;46:5133–5140. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu C, Bettinger CJ. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2013;34:1446–1451. doi: 10.1002/marc.201300420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Buruiana EC, Buruiana T, Lenuta H, Lippert T, Urech L, Wokaun A. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2006;44:5271–5282. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fedoryak OD, Dore TM. Organic Letters. 2002;4:3419–3422. doi: 10.1021/ol026524g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aujard I, Benbrahim C, Gouget M, Ruel O, Baudin J-B, Neveu P, Jullien L. Chemistry – A European Journal. 2006;12:6865–6879. doi: 10.1002/chem.200501393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kloxin AM, Benton JA, Anseth KS. Biomaterials. 2010;31:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Siltanen C, Shin D-S, Sutcliffe J, Revzin A. Angewandte Chemie. 2013;125:9394–9398. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pelliccioli AP, Wirz J. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2002;1:441–458. doi: 10.1039/b200777k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kloxin AM, Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS. Nat. Protocols. 2010;5:1867–1887. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Das M, Sanson N, Fava D, Kumacheva E. Langmuir. 2006;23:196–201. doi: 10.1021/la061596s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Viswanath V, Maity S, Bochinski JR, Clarke LI, Gorga RE. Macromolecules. 2013;46:8596–8607. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ward MA, Georgiou TK. Polymers. 2011;3:1215–1242. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sershen SR, Westcott SL, Halas NJ, West JL. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2000;51:293–298. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<293::aid-jbm1>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.West JL, Halas NJ. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2003;5:285–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.011303.120723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Charati MB, Lee I, Hribar KC, Burdick JA. Small. 2010;6:1608–1611. doi: 10.1002/smll.201000162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shim MS, Lee HT, Shim WS, Park I, Lee H, Chang T, Kim SW, Lee DS. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2002;61:188–196. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jeong B, Bae YH, Kim SW. Macromolecules. 1999;32:7064–7069. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Mencarelli G, Giorgioni G, Palmieri GF. Polymers. 2011;3:779–811. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen L, Xie Z, Hu J, Chen X, Jing X. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2007;9:777–785. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jeong B, Bae YH, Kim SW. Journal of Controlled Release. 2000;63:155–163. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee DS, Shim MS, Kim SW, Lee H, Park I, Chang T. Macromolecular rapid communications. 2001;22:587–592. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nguyen MK, Lee DS. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2010;10:563–579. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200900402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1988;83:596–610. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen C-T, Ball V, de Almeida Gracio JJ, Singh MK, Toniazzo V, Ruch D, Buehler MJ. ACS Nano. 2013;7:1524–1532. doi: 10.1021/nn305305d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Watt AAR, Bothma JP, Meredith P. Soft Matter. 2009;5:3754–3760. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rajadhyaksha M, Gonzalez S, Zavislan JM, Anderson RR, Webb RH. 1999;113:293–303. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00690.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Young AR. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1997;42:789. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/5/004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zeise L, Addison RB, Chedekel MR. Pigment Cell Research. 1990;3:48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1990.tb00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Felix CC, Hyde JS, Sarna T, Sealy RC. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1978;100:3922–3926. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mostert AB, Powell BJ, Pratt FL, Hanson GR, Sarna T, Gentle IR, Meredith P. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:8943–8947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119948109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sardar DK, Glickman RD, Mayo ML. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2001;6:404–411. doi: 10.1117/1.1411978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Simon JD. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2000;33:307–313. doi: 10.1021/ar970250t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vieira SIC, Araujo M, Andre R, Madeira P, Humanes M, Lourenco MJV, De Castro NCA. Journal of Nanofluids. 2013;2:104–111. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vitkin IA, Woolsey J, Wilson BC, Anderson RR. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 1994;59:455–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1994.tb05064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu X, Cao J, Li H, Li J, Jin Q, Ren K, Ji J. ACS Nano. 2013;7:9384–9395. doi: 10.1021/nn404117j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bettinger CJ, Bruggeman JP, Misra A, Borenstein JT, Langer R. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3050–3057. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Khodaverdi E, Hadizadeh F, Tekie F, Jalali A, Mohajeri S, Ganji F. Polymer Bulletin. 2012;69:429–438. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Krause B, Mende M, Potschke P, Petzold G. Carbon. 2010;48:2746–2754. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Khlebtsov BN, Khlebtsov NG. Colloid Journal. 2011;73:118–127. [Google Scholar]
- 47.van Dijk MA, Tchebotareva AL, Orrit M, Lippitz M, Berclaud S, Lasne D, Cognet L, Lounis B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006:3486–3495. doi: 10.1039/b606090k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mohlenhoff B, Romeo M, Diem M, Wood BR. Biophysical Journal. 2005;88:3635–3640. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.057950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Welch AJ. Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of. 1984;20:1471–1481. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Prahl S. Mie Scattering Calculator. http://omlc.ogi.edu/calc/mie_calc.html.
- 51.Bansal NP, Doremus RH. Handbook of glass properties. 1986 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yu L, Chang G, Zhang H, Ding J. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2007;45:1122–1133. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pratoomsoot C, Tanioka H, Hori K, Kawasaki S, Kinoshita S, Tighe PJ, Dua H, Shakesheff KM, Rose FRAJ. Biomaterials. 2008;29:272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nagahama K, Imai Y, Nakayama T, Ohmura J, Ouchi T, Ohya Y. Polymer. 2009;50:3547–3555. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ball V, Frari D, Michel M, Buehler M, Toniazzo V, Singh M, Gracio J, Ruch D. BioNanoScience. 2012;2:16–34. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Surve M, Pryamitsyn V, Ganesan V. Physical Review Letters. 2006;96:177805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.177805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jeong B. University of Utah; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Good RJ. Nature. 1966;212:276–277. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jiang J, Zhu L, Zhu L, Zhu B, Xu Y. Langmuir. 2011;27:14180–14187. doi: 10.1021/la202877k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ju K-Y, Lee Y, Lee S, Park SB, Lee J-K. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:625–632. doi: 10.1021/bm101281b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang Y, Guan Y, Zhou S. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:3196–3201. doi: 10.1021/bm060557s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Guan Y, Zhang Y. Soft Matter. 2011;7:6375–6384. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang C, Flynn NT, Langer R. Advanced Materials. 2004;16:1074–1079. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dewhirst MW, Viglianti BL, Lora-Michiels M, Hanson M, Hoopes PJ. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2003;19:267–294. doi: 10.1080/0265673031000119006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dickson JA, Calderwood SK. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1980;335:180–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb50749.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wust P, Hildebrandt B, Sreenivasa G, Rau B, Gellermann J, Riess H, Felix R, Schlag PM. The Lancet Oncology. 2002;3:487–497. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00818-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.