Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2018 Mar 21;2018:bcr2017223397. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-223397

Renal injury in a patient with lumbar scoliosis

Harjoat Riyat 1, Richard Jones 2, Debashis Sarkar 3,4, Richard Stephenson 2
PMCID: PMC5878359  PMID: 29563127

Abstract

Kidney laceration following blunt trauma is responsible for up to 3% of trauma cases. The risk factors associated with renal injury are attributed to the risks of mechanical injury. However, anatomical variations that may accelerate the insult of injury are poorly documented. This case report describes a 25-year-old with degenerative lumbar scoliosis who presented with flank pain and visible haematuria following a low-impact injury. The patient had a grade IV renal injury. The curvature of the spine, shown on CT imaging, revealed a reduced retroperitoneal space around the left kidney. This case explores lumbar scoliosis as a risk factor for kidney laceration. We hypothesise that this increased risk is associated with asymmetry of the spine and reduced anatomical space in the retroperitoneum. Patients with lumbar scoliosis may be considered a high-risk category for renal injury, following low-impact trauma.

Keywords: hematuria, urological surgery, drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases

Background

The kidneys are the most commonly affected organs in the renal tract following blunt trauma.1 Kidney injuries make up 3% of trauma cases, often because of rapid deceleration, associated with road traffic accidents and falls.2 3 This causes renal contusion, haematoma and avulsion of the vascular pedicle. The injuries are graded from I–V using the modified American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system (table 1).4 Guidelines state that patients who present with blunt trauma and haematuria require a CT scan.5 Patients with lumbar scoliosis may be at higher risk of renal injury following low-impact trauma.

Lumbar scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity of the curvature of the spine in the coronal plane.6 The lateral edges encapsulate the kidney, in a confined retroperitoneal cavity, enhancing the damaging effect of rapid deceleration on the flank.7 This case report explores this risk factor in a young woman presenting with flank pain and haematuria (table 1).

Table 1.

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading scale of kidney injury

Grade Type of injury Description of injury
I Contusion Microscopic or gross haematuria, normal urological studies.
Haematoma Subscapular, non-expanding, without parenchymal laceration.
II Haematoma Non-expanding perirenal haematoma confirmed to renal retroperitoneum.
Laceration Less than 1.0 cm parenchymal depth of renal cortex without urinary extravasation.
III Laceration Less than 1.0 cm parenchymal depth of renal cortex without collecting system rupture or urinary extravasation.
IV Laceration Parenchymal laceration extending through renal cortex, medulla and collecting ducts.
Vascular Main renal artery or vein injury with contained haemorrhage.
V Laceration Completely shattered kidney.
Vascular Avulsion of renal hilum which devascularises kidney.

Case presentation

A 25-year-old female patient, with lumbar scoliosis, presented to accident and emergency with persistent visible haematuria for 2 days following a minor fall in the bath. She had no significant family history and was not on any medications.

On examination, her observations were stable. She was normotensive with a pulse of 83. Her abdomen was soft and non-tender with some mild ecchymosis on her left loin.

Investigations

Her blood tests on admission were unremarkable, her haemoglobin was stable at 136 g/dL andshe was voiding rose-coloured urine. The patient underwent a CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast which confirmed a grade IV left renal injury, affecting the lower, posterior and medial regions, with a large perirenal haematoma (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The left lateral edge of the spine, encapsulating the left kidney, leaving it in a smaller anatomical region compared with a caudal spine.

Treatment

The patient was observed over 72 hours due to the risk of renal rupture and developing haematoma. She had a repeat CT after 48 hours which showed slight resolution of the haematoma.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient was discharged back to her base hospital for renal function follow-up.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of lumbar scoliosis, predisposing

to renal injury following trauma. The volume of the abdominal cavity is altered in lumbar scoliosis. We hypothesise that the asymmetry of the spine results in an equally asymmetric load that perpetuates the deformity and further encapsulates the kidney. Therefore, the kidney is more vulnerable to damage following injury.

CT contrast of the abdomen and pelvis is routinely used in cases that present with blunt injury to the flanks and haematuria.4 7 This case report has identified that patients with lumbar scoliosis may be at higher risk of kidney laceration. CT imaging should be considered in these patients following low-impact blunt trauma.

Learning points.

  • In patients with scoliosis, consider imaging of patients with low-impact injuries.

  • Delayed presentation of patients with renal trauma should not be a barrier to immediate imaging.

  • Changes in distribution of protective perirenal fat may mean lumbar scoliosis, predisposing patients to renal injury.

Footnotes

Contributors: HR wrote the case report with support and editing by RJ and DS. RS was the supporting consultant.

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Dangle PP, Fuller TW, Gaines B, et al. Evolving Mechanisms of Injury and Management of Pediatric Blunt Renal Trauma-20 Years of Experience. Urology 2016;90:159–63. 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller KMcAninch J. Radiographic assessment of renal trauma. The Journal of Urology 1995:352–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nishijima DK, Simel DL, Wisner DH, et al. Does this adult patient have a blunt intra-abdominal injury? JAMA 2012;307:1517 10.1001/jama.2012.422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hohenfellner, et al. Guidelines on Urological Trauma, European Association of Urology Guidelines, 2009. [2] N. F. Alsikafi and D. I. Rosenstein, “Staging, evaluation, andnonoperative management of renal injuries. Urologic Clinics of North America 2006;33:13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morey AF, Brandes S, Dugi DD, et al. Urotrauma: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014;192:327–35. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Illés T, Tunyogi-Csapó M, Somoskeöy S. Breakthrough in three-dimensional scoliosis diagnosis: significance of horizontal plane view and vertebra vectors. Eur Spine J 2011;20:135–43. 10.1007/s00586-010-1566-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Becker CD, Mentha G, Schmidlin F, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma in adults: role of CT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries. Part 2: Gastrointestinal tract and retroperitoneal organs. Eur Radiol 1998;8:772–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES