Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Perfusion. 2017 Nov 1;33(4):249–253. doi: 10.1177/0267659117736379

CO2 Clearance by Membrane Lungs

Liqun Sun 1,1,2, Andreas Kaesler 1,3, Piyumindri Fernando 1,1, Alex Thompson 1,1, John M Toomasian 1,1, Robert H Bartlett 1,1
PMCID: PMC5878985  NIHMSID: NIHMS919188  PMID: 29090614

Abstract

Introduction

Commercial membrane lungs are designed to transfer a specific amount of oxygen per unit of venous blood flow. Membrane lungs are much more efficient at removing CO2 than adding oxygen but the range of CO2 transfer is rarely reported.

Methods

Commercial membrane lungs were studied with the goal of evaluating CO2 removal capacity. CO2 removal was measured in 4 commercial membrane lungs under standardized conditions.

Conclusion

CO2 clearance can be greater than 4 times that of oxygen at a given blood flow when the gas to blood flow ratio is elevated to 4:1 or 8:1. The CO2 clearance was less dependent on surface area and configuration than oxygen transfer. Any ECMO system can be used for selective CO2 removal.

Keywords: Membrane lung, CO2 removal, Blood flow, Sweep gas flow, Sweep gas to blood flow ratio

Introduction

The clinical use of prolonged support with membrane lungs (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO) began more than four decades ago.1,2 ECMO is used to sustain life during severe, acute, cardiac or pulmonary failure leading to recovery or replacement. Membrane lungs replace the physiological function of the lung by fulfilling gas exchange of both oxygen and carbon dioxide (CO2). When the “sweep gas” flow rate(Qg) is the same as the blood flow rate (Qb), the amount of oxygen added and the CO2 removed are approximately equal. When the ratio of gas flow to blood flow is increased there is no increase in oxygenation, but CO2 clearance increases in proportion to the gas flow. Selective CO2 removal with membrane lungs has been used for CO2 retaining syndromes, and in acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS).36

When artificial membrane lungs are used for CO2 removal, the efficiency is determined by the sweep gas to blood flow ratio (Qg: Qb), the inlet PCO2 and the membrane lung properties. The higher the Qg: Qb ratio, the more CO2 is removed. Studies of CO2 removal performance of commercial membrane lungs are rare. A study was designed to test the CO2 removal capacity of several commercial membrane lungs over a wide range of Qg: Qb ratios.

Methods

Four commercial membrane lungs were tested on a single pass in vitro bench model: Terumo Capiox RX 05 (Terumo Cardiovascular, Ann Arbor, MI), Maquet Quadrox-iD Pediatric (Maquet, Wayne, NJ), Medos Hilite 2400 (Xenios AG, Stolberg, Germany), Novalung iLA (Xenios AG, Heilbronn, Germany). These devices were chosen to represent a range of devices with a wide range of membrane surface areas. The bench testing system is illustrated in Figure 1. Large volume (20 liter) polystyrene carboys were used along with a centrifugal pump (Terumo Delphin, Terumo Cardiovascular, Ann Arbor, MI), PVC tubing, connectors and heat exchanger (Medtronic BioTherm, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) with the selected test device. Fresh heparinized bovine slaughterhouse blood was recirculated through a separate membrane lung to create standardized venous blood conditions (PCO2 48 ± 5 mmHg, pH 7.4 ± 0.1, SaO2 65 ± 5%) under other normal parameters (temperature 37 ± 1°C, hemoglobin 12 ± 1 g/dL, base excess 0 ± 3 mmol/L). The test blood was less than 24 hours old and was stored at 4°C prior to use. Following filtration and equilibration, the venous blood was delivered through the test membrane lung at variable Qg: Qb ratios (1:1, 2:1, 4:1 and 8:1) at Qb flows ranging from 0.25–2.0 LPM; this represents typical usage. The ventilating gas was 100% oxygen. Oxygen and CO2 exchange was measured. Device inlet and outlet pO2, pCO2, pH, HCO3 and oxyhemoglobin saturation were measured on a blood gas analyzer (Radiometer ABL 800 Flex, Brea, CA). The exhaust gas pCO2 was measured through the same blood gas analyzer and converted to percent CO2 by dividing the pCO2 by the atmospheric (barometric) pressure. The actual amount of CO2 removed per minute was calculated by multiplying the percent CO2 by the Qg per minute. Each device was tested in triplicate.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Test circuit schematic for gas transfer. (See text for explanation.)

Results

The amount of oxygen transferred per minute for the 4 different devices is shown in Figure 2. Oxygen transfer was unrelated to sweep gas flow and linearly increased with Qb in all devices. O2 transfer was unrelated to surface area until the device’s “rated flow” for oxygen capacity was reached. No devices reached rated flow at 2 L/min.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Oxygen transfer in four different commercial devices at Qg:Qb 1:1.

The method of determining CO2 removal is shown in Figure 3 for each device. The exhaust gas PCO2 and corresponding CO2 removal over a range of Qg and Qb were measured. The CO2 removed is the percent CO2 multiplied by the exhaust gas flow. The CO2 removal at variable blood flow and gas flow for all devices is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CO2 % in exhaust gas at various Qb rates for four devices.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

CO2 clearance over a range of Qb and Qg for four devices.

The CO2 removal was essentially the same as oxygen added when the Qg:Qb ratio was 1:1. When the Qg:Qb ratio was increased to 2:1, 4:1, or 8:1, the amount CO2 removed increased proportionately for all devices as shown in Figure 5. No air embolism occurred in these tests, although gas embolism is a possibility if the gas pressure exceeds blood pressure.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

CO2 clearance over a range of Qb and Qg for all devices. At constant inlet blood PCO2 (48±5), all devices had the same CO2 clearance performance.

Discussion

Membrane lungs are often referred to as “oxygenators” because they are used to add oxygen to blood, although they have another principle function to regulate the CO2. The amount of oxygen added to the blood is the outlet minus inlet oxygen content difference. Oxygen is carried in the blood in two ways: oxygen bound to hemoglobin and oxygen dissolved in blood. The outlet minus inlet oxygen content multiplied by the blood flow describes the amount of oxygen added per minute. The oxygen content is the hemoglobin multiplied by the oxygen saturation multiplied by a constant (e.g. 1.36 cc/O2/gram saturated hemoglobin) plus 0.0031 cc/mmHg/dL (the solubility coefficient of oxygen) multiplied by the pO2.

In a membrane lung, blood enters the device with low oxygen content, then passes through the device and exits with a higher oxygen content. When the device is ventilated with 100% oxygen, the gradient for oxygen transfer is the barometric pressure minus the venous pO2. The amount of oxygen that can be added is limited by the amount of oxygen that the blood can carry. With fully saturated hemoglobin and a hemoglobin concentration of 15 gm/dL, with a corresponding pO2 of 600 mmHg, the resulting oxygen content is 22 cc/dL. Under the same conditions, a normal venous blood oxygen content is about 15–16 cc/dL (65–70% saturation with pO2 35–45 mmHg). Thus, the maximum amount of oxygen that can be added is about 6 cc/dL. The process of adding oxygen in a membrane lung is limited by the surface area and the maximum delivery capacity, defined as the “rated flow.” The rated flow is defined by the flow of normalized venous blood which exits the device at 95% saturation.7

As in the normal lung, the amount of CO2 removed from the blood is the inlet content minus the outlet content. The CO2 content in typical venous blood is approximately 57.5 cc/dL.8 Carbon dioxide is transported in the blood in three ways: dissolved CO2, bound to hemoglobin (carbamino hemoglobin), and as bicarbonate. Blood gas analyzers measure the pCO2 and pH and calculate the bicarbonate using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. The CO2 content can be estimated by converting the mmol (mEq) of bicarbonate to cc of gas using the conversion factor 1mmol = 22.4mL, then calculating the dissolved CO2 using the solubility factor 0.067 cc/mmHg, and adding about 10–30% (depending on oxygenation status) more to account for carbamino hemoglobin.9 Thus, calculating the CO2 content using blood gas analyzer data can be subject to error.

There is no straightforward method to directly measure the CO2 content in blood. The original and gold standard method for primary measurement of the amount of CO2 in blood is to extract all the gases from blood under vacuum, measure the volume, then selectively remove CO2, calculate CO2 content by monitoring the change of volume. This is the century old classic method of Van Slyke.10 Measuring the CO2 content by this method is rarely, if ever, done today because it is very time consuming, subject to user error, and requires extensive practice to yield precise reproducible measurements. A method of measuring the CO2 content used in multi-electrolyte analyzers is to measure “total CO2” by adding an acid to a blood sample which liberates all the CO2, then expose the CO2 to a reagent that changes pH in proportion to the amount of CO2. The CO2 measured in this way is reported as mEq of “bicarbonate” (but it is actually not only bicarbonate; it is an indirect measure of CO2 content). The range of error is about +/−1 mEq/L which is acceptable for clinical interpretation of acid-base balance, but translates to a large error in calculating the actual CO2 content. For these reasons, calculating the CO2 removal of a membrane lung using calculated pre- and post-device content differences is subject to large error.

The actual pre-post device CO2 content difference can be determined by measuring the CO2 in the exhaust gas and back calculating the inlet/outlet content difference assuming normal venous (inlet) CO2 content. This was the method used in experiments described in this study

In clinical application, the amount of CO2 to be removed is matched to combinations of blood and sweep flow. Resting CO2 production (VCO2) is approximately 3 cc/kg for adults, 4 cc/kg for children, and 5 cc/kg for infants. Once the amount of CO2 to be removed is determined, a combination of blood and gas flow may be selected.

Conclusion

When the goal of extracorporeal gas exchange is primarily to remove CO2 the amount of blood flow required can be much less than that required when the goal is oxygenation. The amount of CO2 removed at any blood flow is largely dependent on the inlet PCO2 and sweep gas flow. The CO2 removal can be as much as four times oxygenation for any of the devices tested. Any pediatric size ECMO system can be used for selective CO2 removal in children or adults.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the National Institutes of Health, NIH 2R01 HD015434-29

Footnotes

There are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript by any author

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript by any author.

References

  • 1.Hill JD, O’Brien TG, Murray JJ, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shock-lung syndrome). Use of the Bramson membrane lung. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:629–634. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197203232861204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Jefferies MR, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cardiopulmonary support in infancy. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1976;22:80–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gattinoni L, Kolobow T, Tomlinson T, et al. Low-frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (LFPPV-ECCO2R): an experimental study. Anesth Analg. 1978 Jul-Aug;57(4):470–477. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197807000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kluge S, Braune SA, Engel M, et al. Avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients failing noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1632–1639. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2649-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Braune SA, Kluge S. Extracorporeal lung support in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79(8):934–943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Del Sorbo L, Pisani L, Filippini C, et al. Extracorporeal CO2 removal in hypercapnic patients at risk of noninvasive ventilation failure: a matched cohort study with historical control. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(1):120–127. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Galletti PM, Richardson PD, Snider MT, et al. A standardized method for defining the overall gas transfer performance of an artificial lung. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs. 1972;18:359–368. doi: 10.1097/00002480-197201000-00090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Starling EH. In: Starlings Principles of Human Physiology. 12. Evans CL, editor. Lea and Febiger; Philadelphia: 1956. p. 756. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arthurs CJ, Sudhakar M. Carbon dioxide transport. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2005;5(6):207–210. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Slyke DD, N’Neill JM. Determination of gases in blood and other solutions by vacuum extraction and manometric measurement. J Biol Chem. 1924;61:523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES