Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 19;9(22):15818–15827. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24530

Table 2. Comparison of tumour marker expression in low- and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas according to morphological classification.

Immunohistochemistry expression Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) n (%) High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) n (%) 1p value
WT1 expression*
Negative (complete absence to <1%) 6 (28.6) 36 (42.9)
Positive (≥1%) 15 (71.4) 48 (57.1) 0.32
p53 expression
Focal (≥1% and <70%) 2 (9.5) 1 (1.2)
Complete absence 17 (81.0) 26 (30.6)
Diffuse (≥70%) 2 (9.5) 58 (68.2) <0.0001
p16 expression†
Negative (complete absence to < 90%) 19 (90.5) 34 (41.5)
Positive (≥90%) 2 (9.5) 48 (58.5) <0.001
IHC p53/p16 index
Low-grade pattern (p53 staining in ≥1% and <70% and/or p53 complete absence + p16 <90%) 19 (90.5) 10 (11.9) 2k = 0.68
High-grade pattern (p53 ≥70% or p53 complete absence + p16 ≥90%) 2 (9.5) 74 (88.1) p < 0001

LGSOC: low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma; HGSOC: high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma; *1 woman with HGSOC and 3 women with HGSOC had missing data due to exhaustion of tumour material in the paraffin blocks; statistically significant differences are in bold; 1p values were calculated using the Chi-square or Fisher exact test; 2Kappa Cohen.