Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacology. 2017 May 9;100(1-2):64–73. doi: 10.1159/000471769

Pioglitazone Attenuates Injury-Induced Neointima Formation in Mouse Femoral Artery Partially through the Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase

Islam Osman a,b, Arwa Fairaq a,b, Lakshman Segar a,b,c,d
PMCID: PMC5884074  NIHMSID: NIHMS953723  PMID: 28482342

Abstract

Background/Aims

Pioglitazone (PIO), an antidiabetic drug, has been shown to attenuate vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation, which is a major event in atherosclerosis and restenosis after angioplasty. Till date, the likely contributory role of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) toward PIO inhibition of VSMC proliferation has not been examined in vivo. This study is aimed at determining whether pharmacological inhibition of AMPK would prevent the inhibitory effect of PIO on neointima formation in a mouse model of arterial injury.

Methods

Male CJ57BL/6J mice were subjected to femoral artery injury using guide wire. PIO (20 mg/kg/day) was administered orally 1 day before surgery and for 3 weeks until sacrifice in the absence or presence of compound C (an AMPK inhibitor). Injured femoral arteries were used for morphometric analysis of neointima formation. Aortic tissue lysates were used for immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated AMPK.

Results

PIO treatment resulted in a significant decrease in intima-to-media ratio by ~50.3% (p < 0.05, compared with vehicle control; n = 6), which was accompanied by enhanced phosphorylation of AMPK by ~85% in the vessel wall. Compound C treatment led to a marked reduction in PIO-mediated inhibition of neointima formation.

Conclusion

PIO attenuates injury-induced neo-intima formation, in part, through the activation of AMPK.

Keywords: Arterial injury, Neointima formation, Pioglitazone, AMP-activated protein kinase

Introduction

Atherosclerosis and restenosis after angioplasty are characterized by the exaggerated proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) [13]. It is well accepted that thiazolidinediones (TZDs; e.g., pioglitazone [PIO] and rosiglitazone) exhibit vasoprotective effects through the inhibition of neointima formation/VSMC proliferation [46] beyond their role as insulin sensitizers in patients with type 2 diabetes [7]. For instance, TZDs attenuate neointima formation after coronary stenting in patients with type 2 diabetes [811] and in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome [12]. In addition, TZDs prevent neointima formation after arterial injury in experimental animal models including normal rats [1315], insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats [16], stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats [4], and hypercholesterolemic rabbits [17]. Furthermore, TZD treatment diminishes mitogen-induced VSMC proliferation in vitro [1820]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which TZDs inhibit neointima formation are not fully understood.

Although TZDs are considered classical agonists for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), studies by several investigators suggest that TZD inhibition of VSMC proliferation occurs by PPARγ-dependent [21, 22] and PPARγ-independent mechanisms [20, 23]. Of importance, in vivo transfer of PPARγ gene inhibits smooth muscle proliferation and reduces neointima formation after balloon injury in rat carotid artery [21]. In contrast, treatment with TZD (e.g., rosiglitazone) inhibits injury-induced neointima formation in rat carotid artery through the activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β independent of PPARγ [23]. Our recent study demonstrates that TZD (e.g., PIO) inhibits VSMC proliferation under in vitro conditions, in part, through the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [20]. The objective of the present study is to determine whether the pharmacological inhibition of AMPK would prevent the inhibitory effect of PIO on neo-intima formation in a mouse model of arterial injury.

Materials and Methods

Materials

PIO and compound C were purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). VITROS DT-slides were purchased from Ortho Clinical Diagnostics (Rochester, NY, USA). All surgical tools were purchased from Roboz Surgical Instrument (Gaithersburg, MD). The primary antibodies for phospho-AMPKα Thr172 (2535) and pan-AMPKα (2532) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The primary antibody for SM α-actin (ab5694) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Goat anti-Rabbit IgG secondary antibody Alexa Fluor® 594 conjugate (A-11037) and prolong gold anti-fade mountant with DAPI (P36931) were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). All other chemicals were from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) or Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Animals

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Charlie Norwood Veterans Affairs Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines and were approved by the committee. Male CJ57BL/6J mice (12 weeks of age, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were maintained in a room at a controlled temperature of 23°C with a 12: 12-h dark-light cycle and fed regular chow. For all surgical procedures, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane via inhalation (1–4% in oxygen).

Measurement of Blood Glucose, Plasma Triglycerides, and Total Cholesterol

On the day of sacrifice, mice were allowed to fast overnight for 14 h. Blood samples were then collected from the tail vein for determining blood glucose using Contour glucometer (Bayer Health-Care, Mishawaka, IN, USA). In addition, blood samples were drawn from the retro-orbital plexus of mice using heparinized microhematocrit tubes. Blood samples were centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 4°C. Plasma was carefully transferred to new tubes and kept at –80°C until further analysis. Plasma triglycerides and total cholesterol were measured by an enzymatic colorimetric method using VITROS DT60 II Chemistry System from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. (Rochester, NY, USA).

Femoral Artery Guidewire Injury and Treatments

Guidewire injury was performed in CJ57BL/6J mice as previously described [24, 25]. The injury was induced by inserting a straight spring wire (0.38 mm in diameter; Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) from an exposed muscular branch artery into the left femoral artery for >5 mm toward the iliac artery. The wire was left in place for 1 min to denude and dilate the femoral artery. Then, the wire was removed and the proximal portion of the muscular branch artery was secured with silk sutures and blood flow was restored in the left femoral artery. The right femoral artery was not subjected to guidewire injury and therefore served as sham-operated control. PIO was prepared as a suspension in 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). PIO (20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (0.5% CMC) treatments were initiated 1 day before surgery and were administered daily by oral gavage for 3 weeks until sacrifice. In select experiments, compound C (20 mg/kg, every other day) dissolved in DMSO or vehicle (DMSO) treatment was initiated 1 day before surgery and was administered every other day by intraperitoneal injection for 3 weeks until sacrifice [26]. Three weeks after arterial injury, mice were euthanized with isoflurane via inhalation and perfused at a constant pressure via the left ventricle with 0.9% NaCl solution, followed by perfusion fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS, pH 7.4. The femoral artery was carefully excised, further fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C, then washed in deionized water, and kept in 30% sucrose for 24 h at 4°C before cryosection.

Morphometric Analysis of Femoral Artery

Cross-sections (5 μm) of femoral artery were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for examination of overall morphology or elastica van Gieson’s (EVG) to depict the internal elastic lamina (IEL) and the external elastic lamina (EEL), and the images were captured by AxioCam high-resolution camera attached to an Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Inc., Thornwood, NY, USA). Sections were analyzed for intima-to-media ratios using image analysis software (Axiovision, release 4.8.2 SP3). The intimal area was determined by subtraction of the luminal area from the IEL area (i.e., intimal area = IEL area – luminal area). The medial area was determined by subtraction of the IEL area from the EEL area (i.e., medial area = EEL area – IEL area) [25]. The cryosectioning, H&E staining, and EVG staining of the injured femoral arteries (from control and treated conditions) were performed in a blinded manner as described earlier [27].

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Femoral Artery

Cross-sections (5 μm) of femoral artery were fixed in 4% PFA and then blocked by incubation with 5% normal goat serum/0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h. Subsequently, sections were exposed to the primary antibody specific for SM α-actin (1:200) for 1 h at room temperature, washed 3 times with PBS, and incubated with the secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa fluor 594) for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were mounted using prolong antifade with DAPI and the images were captured using a confocal microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA) as described [25].

Extraction and Quantification of Proteins in Aortic Tissues

Mice were euthanized with isoflurane via inhalation and perfused at a constant pressure via the left ventricle with 0.9% NaCl solution. The aortic tissues were then carefully excised and cleared from the fat and connective tissue, rinsed in ice-cold fresh phosphate-buffered saline, blotted to dryness, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until analysis. Aortic tissues were thawed in 100 μL of ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) for 2 min, followed by homogenization using TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) at a setting of 50 Hz for 5 min with samples being placed on ice intermittently. The homogenates were incubated at 4°C for 1 h on a rotator and centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min at 4° C to remove tissue debris. The supernatants were mixed with 2× Laemmli sample buffer at a ratio of 1:1 followed by heating at 67.5° C for 10 min. Proteins were quantified using Bio-Rad DC assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Immunoblot Analysis

Immunoblot analysis was performed as described [20]. Mouse aortic tissues (20 μg protein per lane) were subjected to electrophoresis using pre cast 4–12% Nu Page mini-gels(Life Technologies).The resolved proteins were then transferred to PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Subsequently, the membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk and probed with the respective primary antibodies. The immunoreactivity was detected using HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (7074; Cell Signaling) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The immunoblots for ECL detection of AMPK and its phosphorylated form were run in parallel. The protein bands were quantified by densitometric analysis using ImageJ.

Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as the means ± SEM. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni t test for data involving more than 2 groups, or unpaired 2-tailed t test for data involving 2 groups only. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

PIO Treatment Does Not Affect Fasting Blood Glucose Levels, Plasma Triglycerides, or Plasma Total Cholesterol in CJ57BL/6J Mice

As shown in Table 1, PIO treatment for 3 weeks did not result in significant changes in the levels of fasting blood glucose, plasma triglycerides, and plasma total cholesterol, compared with vehicle-treated control mice. In addition, there was no significant difference in body weight during the 3-week treatment period with PIO, compared with control mice (data not shown).

Table 1.

Effects of PIO treatment on metabolic parameters in C57BL/6J mice

Control PIO treatment
Fasting blood glucose, mg/dL 102.6±8.4 106.4±11.9
Plasma triglycerides, mg/dL 56.2±5.3 51.4±3.9
Plasma total cholesterol, mg/dL 105.1±6.8 103±4.9

Blood samples were collected after a 14-h fast on the day of sacrifice.

Data are expressed as means ± SEM.

PIO Inhibits Neointima Formation in CJ57BL/6J Mice

Previous studies have shown that TZDs attenuate neo-intima formation after coronary stenting in diabetic and nondiabetic patients [812]. In addition, TZDs prevent neointima formation after arterial injury in different experimental animal models [4, 1317]. In this study, we examined the effects of PIO on neointima formation in CJ57BL/6J mice. As shown in Figure 1a–c, femoral artery injury in CJ57BL/6J mice resulted in extensive neointima formation. In addition, most cells in the intimal area were positive for SM α-actin, a marker for VSMCs ( Fig. 1d). PIO treatment led to significant decreases in the intimal area and neointima/media ratio by ~48.1 and ~50.3%, respectively (Fig. 1a–d). The medial area was not significantly different between all groups (data not shown).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Effects of PIO treatment on neointima formation after femoral artery injury in CJ57BL/6J mice. PIO was administered orally by gavage (20 mg/kg/day) starting a day before femoral artery injury and for 3 weeks until sacrifice. a EVG and H&E staining of injured femoral arteries from control and treatment groups; arrows indicate internal and external elastic laminae. b, c Morphometric analyses of intimal area and intima/media ratio in the injured femoral arteries; *p < 0.05 compared with vehicle control; n = 6. d Confocal immunofluorescence analysis of smooth muscle (SM) α-actin (red), elastin autofluorescence (laminae, green), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and merged images in the injured femoral arteries. Representative images from control and treatment groups are shown.

PIO Enhances the Phosphorylation of AMPK in Mouse Aorta

Next, we examined the extent to which PIO regulates AMPK activation in the vessel wall. As shown in Figure 2, PIO administration for 3 weeks led to enhanced phosphorylation of AMPK in the aorta by ~85%.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effects of PIO treatment on aortic AMPK phosphorylation in CJ57BL/6J mice. PIO was administered orally by gavage (20 mg/ kg/day) starting a day before surgery and for 3 weeks until sacrifice. Aortic tissue lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis using primary antibodies specific for pAMPK and AMPK. β-Actin was used as a loading control. *p < 0.05 compared with vehicle control; n = 6.

Compound C, an AMPK Inhibitor, Reduces PIO-Mediated Inhibition of Neointima Formation

To examine the likely contributory role of AMPK toward PIO inhibition of neointima formation, CJ57BL/6J mice were treated with compound C (an AMPK inhibitor) during the oral administration of PIO. As shown in Figure 3a–c, Compound C by itself led a marked increase in neointima formation by ~32.9%. This increase in neointima formation did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.058), owing to an n value of 6 used in the present study. Notably, in the presence of compound C, PIO treatment led to significant decreases in intimal area and neointima/media ratio by ~29.5 and ~29%, respectively. However, in the absence of compound C, PIO treatment alone resulted in significant decreases in intimal area and neointima/media ratio by ~49.1 and ~55.7%, respectively. Thus, compound C treatment led to a marked reduction in PIO-mediated inhibition of neointima formation in the injured femoral artery.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effects of compound C, an AMPK inhibitor, on PIO-mediated inhibition of neointima formation in CJ57BL/6J mice. Compound C (Comp C; 20 mg/kg, every other day) or vehicle control was injected intraperitoneally a day before surgery and for 3 weeks until sacrifice. PIO was administered orally by gavage (20 mg/kg/day) starting a day before surgery and for 3 weeks until sacrifice. a EVG and H&E staining of injured femoral arteries from the respective treatment groups; arrows indicate internal and external elastic laminae. b, c Morphometric analyses of intimal area and intima/media ratio in the injured femoral arteries; * p < 0.05 compared with vehicle control; n = 6.

Discussion

The present findings reveal that PIO (an antidiabetic drug) inhibits neointima formation after arterial injury, in part, through the activation of AMPK. Previously, several pharmacological agents and adipokines have been shown to inhibit neointima formation via AMPK-dependent mechanism. For instance, metformin (an antidiabetic drug) [28], 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-d-ribofuranoside (an AMPK activator) [29], and adiponectin [30] inhibit injury-induced neointima formation through the AMPK activation. As a corollary, genetic ablation of AMPK enhances neointima formation in vivo [31, 32]. In addition, a previous study [33] and the present findings show that treatment with compound C (an AMPK inhibitor) alone tends to induce an increase in the intima/media ratio in the injured arteries of control mice. Of importance, compound C partially counters the PIO-mediated decrease in neointima formation in the injured femoral artery. Together, antidiabetic drugs (e.g., PIO and metformin) and adiponectin have the potential to attenuate restenosis after angioplasty by targeting AMPK in vulnerable vessels.

From a mechanistic perspective, PIO activation of AMPK in the vessel wall may occur through indirect and direct effects. The indirect effect is attributed to its insulin-sensitizing action via PPARγ activation in the adipose tissue. In this regard, PIO-mediated PPARγ activation in adipocytes results in enhanced synthesis and release of adiponectin into the systemic circulation [34]. An increase in the circulating concentration of adiponectin may thus activate AMPK in VSMCs [35, 36]. Our recent in vitro study demonstrates that PIO activates AMPK through its direct effect in VSMCs independent of PPARγ activation [20]. This study shows that PIO activates AMPK in the aorta under in vivo conditions. Notably, PIO also enhances the phosphorylation of AMPK in rabbit vein grafts [37]. Thus, PIO inhibition of neointima formation may occur indirectly through adiponectin-mediated AMPK activation in VSMCs and also through its direct effect in VSMCs in vulnerable vessels.

Recently, we have reported that PIO inhibits PDGF-induced VSMC proliferation via AMPK-dependent inhibition of mTOR signaling and AMPK-independent inhibition of ERK signaling [20]. In addition to the well-documented role of AMPK toward the inhibition of mTOR/ p70S6K signaling leading to cell cycle arrest [38], several other mechanisms have been proposed to explain the inhibitory effect of AMPK on VSMC proliferation. For instance, AMPK upregulates cell cycle inhibitors (p21 Cip1 and p27 Kip1) that negatively regulate the cell cycle [39]. In addition, AMPK activation results in the inhibition of many biosynthetic pathways (e.g., protein synthesis, fatty acid synthesis, and cholesterol synthesis), which provide adequate macromolecules before cells can commit to mitotic division [40]. It is noteworthy that AMPK activation is associated with other salutary effects in the vessel wall in addition to the inhibition of VSMC proliferation. For instance, AMPK activators inhibit VSMC migration [41], preserve endothelial cell function [42, 43], exhibit anti-inflammatory effects [44], and exhibit endothelial cell-independent vasorelaxant effects [45, 46], which subserve their role as viable pharmacological tools to ameliorate vascular dysfunction.

A limitation of this study was that the size of the injured femoral artery was very small and so we could not obtain sufficient amounts of tissue for western blot analysis to quantify AMPK phosphorylation state. We therefore used aorta (a large vessel) to quantify PIO-mediated increase in arterial AMPK phosphorylation. To determine the contributory role of AMPK toward PIO inhibition of neointima formation in mouse femoral artery, we used an ATP-competitive inhibitor of AMPK, compound C [47]. Of importance, compound C counters the inhibition of neointima formation by PIO (present study), an adipokine (e.g., omentin) [33], and a calcium channel blocker (e.g., nifedipine) [48]. Although these findings with compound C suggest a potential role for activated AMPK to inhibit neointima formation, compound C has also been shown to exhibit AMPK-independent effects [49]. While perivascular delivery of compound C attenuates neointima formation in balloon-injured rat carotid artery via AMPK-independent mechanism [49], intra-peritoneal administration of compound C tends to increase neointima formation in guidewire-injured mouse femoral artery (Uemura et al. [33]; and present study). Since compound C treatment alone tends to increase neo-intima formation likely through proliferative signaling pathways independent of AMPK, this may also play a role in countering PIO-mediated inhibition of neointima formation. Together, AMPK-dependent and AMPK-independent effects of compound C toward altered VSMC phenotype may be attributable to several factors, including differences in the species, route of administration/delivery, drug dose/concentration, and vascular beds. Future studies should determine the effects of PIO on injury-induced neointima formation in mice that are deficient in VSMC-specific AMPKα.

A recent meta-analysis of relevant randomized clinical trials suggests that TZD therapy is an effective strategy to prevent instent restenosis in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary stenting [50]. Yet, TZD treatment is associated with several adverse effects, including weight gain, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure, thus raising concerns about their cardiovascular safety [51]. These unfavorable effects are attributed, in part, to systemic activation of PPARγ [52, 53]. This study reveals that PIO inhibits neointima formation in normal CJ57BL/6J mice without affecting the basal metabolic parameters such as blood glucose levels, triglycerides, and total cholesterol. These findings suggest that PIO inhibits neointima formation via direct effects in the vessel wall (through activation of AMPK) independent of its antidiabetic properties. From a therapeutic standpoint, the local delivery of PIO at the lesion site may provide a realistic approach to limit restenosis after angioplasty without inducing PPARγ-mediated systemic adverse effects.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health Grant (R01-HL-097090), University of Georgia Research Foundation Fund, and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy Graduate Assistantship Award.

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Ross R. Atherosclerosis – an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–126. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schwartz SM, deBlois D, O’Brien ER. The intima. Soil for atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circ Res. 1995;77:445–465. doi: 10.1161/01.res.77.3.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:767–801. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yoshimoto T, Naruse M, Shizume H, Naruse K, Tanabe A, Tanaka M, Tago K, Irie K, Muraki T, Demura H, Zardi L. Vasculoprotective effects of insulin sensitizing agent pioglitazone in neointimal thickening and hypertensive vascular hypertrophy. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145:333–340. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00085-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Phillips JW, Barringhaus KG, Sanders JM, Yang Z, Chen M, Hesselbacher S, Czarnik AC, Ley K, Nadler J, Sarembock IJ. Rosiglitazone reduces the accelerated neointima formation after arterial injury in a mouse injury model of type 2 diabetes. Circulation. 2003;108:1994–1999. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000092886.52404.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Satoh N, Ogawa Y, Usui T, Tagami T, Kono S, Uesugi H, Sugiyama H, Sugawara A, Yamada K, Shimatsu A, Kuzuya H, Nakao K. Antiatherogenic effect of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetic patients irrespective of the responsiveness to its antidiabetic effect. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2493–2499. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP, Kravitz BG, Lachin JM, O’Neill MC, Zinman B, Viberti G ADOPT Study Group. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2427–2443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takagi T, Akasaka T, Yamamuro A, Honda Y, Hozumi T, Morioka S, Yoshida K. Troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1529–1535. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00895-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishio K, Sakurai M, Kusuyama T, Shigemitsu M, Fukui T, Kawamura K, Itoh S, Konno N, Katagiri T. A randomized comparison of pioglitazone to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:101–106. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choi D, Kim SK, Choi SH, Ko YG, Ahn CW, Jang Y, Lim SK, Lee HC, Cha BS. Preventative effects of rosiglitazone on restenosis after coronary stent implantation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2654–2660. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patel D, Walitt B, Lindsay J, Wilensky RL. Role of pioglitazone in the prevention of restenosis and need for revascularization after bare-metal stent implantation: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Katayama T, Ueba H, Tsuboi K, Kubo N, Yasu T, Kuroki M, Saito M, Momomura S, Kawakami M. Reduction of neointimal hyperplasia after coronary stenting by pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007;153:762e1–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Law RE, Meehan WP, Xi XP, Graf K, Wuthrich DA, Coats W, Faxon D, Hsueh WA. Troglitazone inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and intimal hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1897–1905. doi: 10.1172/JCI118991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aizawa Y, Kawabe J, Hasebe N, Takehara N, Kikuchi K. Pioglitazone enhances cytokine-induced apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells and reduces intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001;104:455–460. doi: 10.1161/hc3001.092040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Igarashi M, Hirata A, Yamaguchi H, Tsuchiya H, Ohnuma H, Tominaga M, Daimon M, Kato T. Characterization of an inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on balloon-injured vascular smooth muscle cell growth. Metabolism. 2001;50:955–962. doi: 10.1053/meta.2001.24869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shinohara E, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Funahashi T, Nakamura T, Yamashita S, Kameda-Takemura K, Matsuzawa Y. Troglitazone suppresses intimal formation following balloon injury in insulin-resistant zucker fatty rats. Atherosclerosis. 1998;136:275–279. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(97)00220-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pakala R, Dilcher C, Baffour R, Hellinga D, Seabron R, Joner M, Kolodgie F, Virmani R, Waksman R. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand pioglitazone alters neointimal composition in a balloon-denuded and radiated hypercholesterolemic rabbit. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;48:299–305. doi: 10.1097/01.fjc.0000249891.40714.2a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Law RE, Goetze S, Xi XP, Jackson S, Kawano Y, Demer L, Fishbein MC, Meehan WP, Hsueh WA. Expression and function of PPARgamma in rat and human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 2000;101:1311–1318. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.11.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Dios ST, Bruemmer D, Dilley RJ, Ivey ME, Jennings GL, Law RE, Little PJ. Inhibitory activity of clinical thiazolidinedione peroxisome proliferator activating receptor-gamma ligands toward internal mammary artery, radial artery, and saphenous vein smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation. 2003;107:2548–2550. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074040.31731.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Osman I, Segar L. Pioglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, attenuates PDGF-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation through AMPK-dependent and AMPK-independent inhibition of mTOR/p70S6K and ERK signaling. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016;101:54–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lim S, Jin CJ, Kim M, Chung SS, Park HS, Lee IK, Lee CT, Cho YM, Lee HK, Park KS. PPARgamma gene transfer sustains apoptosis, inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and reduces neo-intima formation after balloon injury in rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:808–813. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000204634.26163.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Subramanian V, Golledge J, Ijaz T, Bruemmer D, Daugherty A. Pioglitazone-induced reductions in atherosclerosis occur via smooth muscle cell-specific interaction with PPAR{gamma} Circ Res. 2010;107:953–958. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.219089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee CS, Kwon YW, Yang HM, Kim SH, Kim TY, Hur J, Park KW, Cho HJ, Kang HJ, Park YB, Kim HS. New mechanism of rosiglitazone to reduce neointimal hyperplasia: activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta followed by inhibition of MMP-9. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:472–479. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.176230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sata M, Maejima Y, Adachi F, Fukino K, Saiura A, Sugiura S, Aoyagi T, Imai Y, Kurihara H, Kimura K, Omata M, Makuuchi M, Hirata Y, Nagai R. A mouse model of vascular injury that induces rapid onset of medial cell apoptosis followed by reproducible neointimal hyperplasia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32:2097–2104. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shawky NM, Pichavaram P, Shehatou GS, Suddek GM, Gameil NM, Jun JY, Segar L. Sulforaphane improves dysregulated metabolic profile and inhibits leptin-induced VSMC proliferation: implications toward suppression of neointima formation after arterial injury in western diet-fed obese mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2016;32:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uemura Y, Shibata R, Kanemura N, Ohashi K, Kambara T, Hiramatsu-Ito M, Enomoto T, Yuasa D, Joki Y, Matsuo K, Ito M, Hayakawa S, Ogawa H, Murohara T, Ouchi N. Adipose-derived protein omentin prevents neointimal formation after arterial injury. FASEB J. 2015;29:141–151. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-258129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shawky NM, Segar L. Sulforaphane inhibits platelet-derived growth factor-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by targeting mTOR/p70S6kinase signaling independent of Nrf2 activation. Pharmacol Res. 2017;119:251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu J, Ji J, Meng H, Wang D, Jiang B, Liu L, Randell E, Adeli K, Meng QH. The protective effect and underlying mechanism of metformin on neointima formation in fructose-induced insulin resistant rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stone JD, Narine A, Shaver PR, Fox JC, Vuncannon JR, Tulis DA. AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration and vascular remodeling following injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304:H369–H381. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00446.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Takaoka M, Nagata D, Kihara S, Shimomura I, Kimura Y, Tabata Y, Saito Y, Nagai R, Sata M. Periadventitial adipose tissue plays a critical role in vascular remodeling. Circ Res. 2009;105:906–911. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.199653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Song P, Wang S, He C, Wang S, Liang B, Viollet B, Zou MH. AMPKα2 deletion exacerbates neointima formation by upregulating Skp2 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 2011;109:1230–1239. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.250423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 32.Song P, Zhou Y, Coughlan KA, Dai X, Xu H, Viollet B, Zou MH. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-α2 deficiency promotes vascular smooth muscle cell migration via S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 upregulation and E-cadherin downregulation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:2800–2809. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 33.Uemura Y, Shibata R, Kanemura N, Ohashi K, Kambara T, Hiramatsu-Ito M, Enomoto T, Yuasa D, Joki Y, Matsuo K, Ito M, Hayakawa S, Ogawa H, Murohara T, Ouchi N. Adipose-derived protein omentin prevents neointimal formation after arterial injury. FASEB J. 2015;29:141–151. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-258129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kadowaki T, Yamauchi T, Kubota N, Hara K, Ueki K, Tobe K. Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1784–1792. doi: 10.1172/JCI29126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ding M, Xie Y, Wagner RJ, Jin Y, Carrao AC, Liu LS, Guzman AK, Powell RJ, Hwa J, Rzucidlo EM, Martin KA. Adiponectin induces vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation via repression of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 and FoxO4. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1403–1410. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.216804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ding M, Carrao AC, Wagner RJ, Xie Y, Jin Y, Rzucidlo EM, Yu J, Li W, Tellides G, Hwa J, Aprahamian TR, Martin KA. Vascular smooth muscle cell-derived adiponectin: a paracrine regulator of contractile phenotype. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52:474–484. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Morisaki K, Shibata R, Takahashi N, Ouchi N, Maehara Y, Murohara T, Komori K. Pioglitazone prevents intimal hyperplasia in experimental rabbit vein grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1753–1759. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim EJ, Choi YK, Han YH, Kim HJ, Lee IK, Lee MO. RORα suppresses proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175:515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Igata M, Motoshima H, Tsuruzoe K, Kojima K, Matsumura T, Kondo T, Taguchi T, Nakamaru K, Yano M, Kukidome D, Matsumoto K, Toyonaga T, Asano T, Nishikawa T, Araki E. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase suppresses vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation through the inhibition of cell cycle progression. Circ Res. 2005;97:837–844. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000185823.73556.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dandapani M, Hardie DG. AMPK: opposing the metabolic changes in both tumour cells and inflammatory cells? Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41:687–693. doi: 10.1042/BST20120351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pei X, Li X, Chen H, Han Y, Fan Y. Thymoquinone inhibits angiotensin II-induced proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells through the AMPK/PPARγ/ PGC-1α pathway. DNA Cell Biol. 2016;35:426–433. doi: 10.1089/dna.2016.3262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Y, Huang Y, Lam KS, Li Y, Wong WT, Ye H, Lau CW, Vanhoutte PM, Xu A. Berberine prevents hyperglycemia-induced endothelial injury and enhances vasodilatation via adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;82:484–492. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li D, Zhang Y, Ma J, Ling W, Xia M. Adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase regulates ABCG1-mediated oxysterol efflux from endothelial cells and protects against hypercholesterolemia-induced endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1354–1362. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.204230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.He C, Li H, Viollet B, Zou MH, Xie Z. AMPK suppresses vascular inflammation in vivo by inhibiting signal transducer and activator of transcription-1. Diabetes. 2015;64:4285–4297. doi: 10.2337/db15-0107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Horman S, Morel N, Vertommen D, Hussain N, Neumann D, Beauloye C, El Najjar N, Forcet C, Viollet B, Walsh MP, Hue L, Rider MH. AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylates and desensitizes smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:18505–18512. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802053200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Goirand F, Solar M, Athea Y, Viollet B, Mateo P, Fortin D, Leclerc J, Hoerter J, Ventura-Clapier R, Garnier A. Activation of AMP kinase alpha1 subunit induces aortic vasorelaxation in mice. J Physiol. 2007;581:1163–1171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.132589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhou G, Myers R, Li Y, Chen Y, Shen X, Fenyk-Melody J, Wu M, Ventre J, Doebber T, Fujii N, Musi N, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ, Moller DE. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:1167–1174. doi: 10.1172/JCI13505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sung JY, Choi HC. Nifedipine inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and reactive oxygen species production through AMP-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Vascul Pharmacol. 2012;56:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Peyton KJ, Yu Y, Yates B, Shebib AR, Liu XM, Wang H, Durante W. Compound C inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in an AMP-activated protein kinase-independent fashion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;338:476–484. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.181784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Geng DF, Jin DM, Wu W, Wang Z, Wang JF. Effect of thiazolidinediones on instent restenosis in patients after coronary stenting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:521–528. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nesto RW, Bell D, Bonow RO, Fonseca V, Grundy SM, Horton ES, Le Winter M, Porte D, Semenkovich CF, Smith S, Young LH, Kahn R American Heart Association; American Diabetes Association. Thiazolidinedione use, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. Circulation. 2003;108:2941–2948. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000103683.99399.7E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Guan Y, Hao C, Cha DR, Rao R, Lu W, Kohan DE, Magnuson MA, Redha R, Zhang Y, Breyer MD. Thiazolidinediones expand body fluid volume through PPARgamma stimulation of ENaC-mediated renal salt absorption. Nat Med. 2005;11:861–866. doi: 10.1038/nm1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang H, Zhang A, Kohan DE, Nelson RD, Gonzalez FJ, Yang T. Collecting duct-specific deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma blocks thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:9406–9411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501744102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES