Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1045–1047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0102

Frequency and Magnitude of Co-payments Exceeding Prescription Drug Costs

Karen Van Nuys 1,, Geoffrey Joyce 1, Rocio Ribero 1, Dana P Goldman 1
PMCID: PMC5885874  PMID: 29536088

Abstract

This study uses Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data to assess the proportion of pharmacy claims with patient co-pay overpayment and the mean dollar amount of overpayment in 2013.


A co-payment suggests sharing the total cost between patients and payers. However, drug co-payments sometimes exceed costs, with the insurer or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) keeping the difference. Furthermore, some pharmacists are contractually prevented from alerting patients when their co-payment exceeds the drug’s cash price. Although some have argued that the practice is uncommon, a 2016 survey of independent pharmacists indicates otherwise.

Such overpayments have been the subject of lawsuits and state legislation, but little is known about their frequency or magnitude.

Methods

Pharmacies collect patients’ co-payments and pass them to PBMs, who reimburse the pharmacy a negotiated rate to cover drug costs, dispensing fees, and any markup. Overpayments occur when the co-payment exceeds the negotiated reimbursement. To assess the frequency of overpayments, we compared co-payments with the national average reimbursement received by pharmacies for commercially insured patients for the same prescription.

The reimbursement data came from a survey by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from January to June 2013, the national average retail price (NARP). NARP data are based on 50 million retail pharmacy transactions from independent and chain pharmacies nationwide. They measure per-unit mean reimbursement to retail pharmacies for commercially insured patients for more than 4000 common outpatient drugs and represent the total cost to the PBM, including dispensing fees and pharmacy markup.

We compared NARP reimbursements to co-payments from pharmacy claims from a 25% random sample of Optum’s Clinformatics Data Mart from the same period. These claims come from 1.6 million commercially insured beneficiaries from 50 states, with greater representation from the south and less from the northeast compared with the US privately insured population. The data are representative in terms of sex, but overrepresent the age category of 21 to 64 years.

We identified claims in which co-payment exceeded NARP reimbursement, and the excess amount (overpayment). To ensure the excess did not simply reflect variation in reimbursements (NARP measures average reimbursement), we conservatively identified overpayments only on claims in which the co-payment exceeded the NARP by more than $2.00 for reimbursements below $20 or 10% of the NARP for reimbursements above $20. We calculated the frequency and mean size of overpayments for all claims and performed 2-sided tests of equality between these values for brand drugs vs generic drugs (α = .05). We report results for all prescriptions together, and for the 20 drugs most frequently prescribed. Confidence intervals were binomial; all analyses were performed with Stata (StataCorp), version 14.0.

Results

Among 9.5 million claims, 2.2 million (22.94% [95% CI, 22.91%-22.97%]) involved overpayments (Table 1). The 28.17% rate (95% CI, 28.14%-28.20%) for generic drugs was significantly greater than for brand drugs (5.95% [95% CI, 5.92%-5.98%]); difference, 22.22% (95% CI, 22.17%-22.26%), P < .001. The mean overpayment was $7.69 (SD, $8.59); 17.15% (95% CI, 17.10%-17.20%) exceeded $10. Although less common, overpayments were significantly larger on brand drugs (mean, $13.46 [SD, $18.01]) than on generic drugs (mean, $7.32 [SD, $7.43]); difference, $6.14 (95% CI, $6.09-$6.19), P < .001. Aggregate overpayments totaled $135 million for 2013 or $10.51 per covered member.

Table 1. Frequency and Mean Overpayment Among Pharmacy Claims With Patient Co-pay Overpayment in the United States, 2013a.

Drugs No. of Claims No. of Claims With Overpayment Frequency of Claims With Overpayment, % (95% CI)b Overpayment (When Present), $
Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
All 9 539 846 2 188 578 22.94 (22.91-22.97) 7.69 (8.59) 5.78 (3.83-8.56)
Generic 7 295 525 2 055 024 28.17 (28.14-28.20) 7.32 (7.43) 5.64 (3.80-8.29)
Brand 2 244 321 133 554 5.95 (5.92-5.98) 13.46 (18.01) 8.77 (6.16-13.44)
a

Sources: Optum’s Clinformatics Data Mart pharmacy claims 2013 and national average retail prices 2013. Statistical analysis performed with Stata (StataCorp), version 14.0.

b

Confidence intervals were binomial.

The most commonly prescribed drug, hydrocodone/acetaminophen, involved an overpayment on 36.15% of claims (95% CI, 35.99%-36.31%), with mean overpayment of $6.94 (SD, $4.27) (Table 2). Twelve of the 20 most commonly prescribed drugs involved overpayment rates above 33%.

Table 2. Frequency and Mean Overpayment Among Pharmacy Claims With Patient Co-pay Overpayment for the 20 Most Frequently Prescribed Drugs in the United States, 2013a.

Rank by No. of Claims Drug Name No. of Claims No. of Claims With Overpayment Frequency of Claims With Overpayment, % (95% CI)c Overpayment (When Present), $
Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
1 Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 330 812 119 587 36.15 (35.99-36.31) 6.94 (4.27) 6.26 (4.46-8.35)
2 Levothyroxine sodium 258 936 108 910 42.06 (41.87-42.25) 6.12 (4.82) 5.59 (3.64-6.56)
3 Azithromycin 218 416 38 600 17.67 (17.51-17.83) 8.53 (7.12) 5.38 (4.81-9.86)
4 Lisinopril 212 553 103 612 48.75 (48.53-48.96) 7.17 (6.08) 5.87 (4.50-7.47)
5 Fluticasone propionate 163 891 3427 2.09 (2.02-2.16) 17.55 (5.10) 18.91 (17.83-20.10)
6 Simvastatin 162 241 84 324 51.97 (51.73-52.22) 6.33 (7.85) 3.62 (3.34-8.02)
7 Atorvastatin calcium 161 998 12 199 7.53 (7.40-7.66) 8.82 (11.20) 4.90 (2.35-11.29)
8 Omeprazole 157 964 17 858 11.31 (11.15-11.46) 10.34 (11.05) 6.39 (5.51-11.08)
9 Amoxicillin 153 293 54 770 35.73 (35.49-35.97) 6.21 (4.70) 5.14 (3.38-7.16)
10 Amlodipine besylate 150 060 89 688 59.77 (59.52-60.02) 6.98 (7.99) 4.25 (3.83-8.83)
11 Sertraline hydrochloride 128 829 60 328 46.83 (46.56-47.10) 5.94 (6.90) 3.50 (3.03-7.84)
12 Amoxicillin trihydrate/potassium clavulanate 113 724 3636 3.20 (3.10-3.30) 12.07 (7.73) 9.64 (4.98-18.97)
13 Zolpidem tartrate 111 616 67 516 60.49 (60.20-60.78) 6.48 (6.99) 3.57 (2.70-7.86)
14 Ventolin hydrofluoroalkane (albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol)b 105 818 198 0.19 (0.16-0.22) 19.95 (15.00) 20.53 (5.79-28.02)
15 Crestor (rosuvastatin calcium)b 102 596 105 0.10 (0.08-0.12) 14.56 (20.09) 8.12 (5.51-17.81)
16 Metformin hydrochloride 97 015 32 548 33.55 (33.25-33.85) 6.72 (6.79) 4.42 (3.43-8.05)
17 Hydrochlorothiazide 95 837 45 905 47.90 (47.58-48.22) 6.86 (4.13) 7.04 (4.97-7.16)
18 Metoprolol succinate 91 904 19 995 21.76 (21.49-22.02) 13.21 (13.97) 9.79 (7.72-14.72)
19 Citalopram hydrobromide 89 521 42 916 47.94 (47.61-48.27) 7.08 (7.49) 4.66 (4.01-8.86)
20 Prednisone 88 675 44 508 50.19 (49.86-50.52) 6.79 (3.72) 6.70 (4.41-8.22)
a

Sources: Optum Clinformatics Data Mart pharmacy claims 2013 and national average retail prices 2013. Statistical analysis performed with Stata (StataCorp), version 14.0.

b

Brand drugs.

c

Confidence intervals were binomial.

Discussion

Overpayments were common in this data set, affecting 23% of all prescriptions, and 28% of generic prescriptions. Although the mean overpayment was relatively small, their widespread use on popular drugs resulted in a total cost of $10.51 per member. By comparison, 1 large PBM reported its clients spent $10.67 per member on metformin in 2016.

Primary limitations were the use of pharmacy claims from a single, large insurer and national mean prices, which were only available for 2013 and may not represent current practice.

Cost-related nonadherence is common and associated with increased medical services use and negative health outcomes. By raising patient costs at the point of sale, overpayments may exacerbate these effects. To lower patient expenses, legislation addressing overpayments and gag clauses warrants further investigation.

Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor.

References


Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES