Skip to main content
Human Molecular Genetics logoLink to Human Molecular Genetics
. 2017 Jul 27;26(21):4132–4141. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx300

MeCP2_E1 N-terminal modifications affect its degradation rate and are disrupted by the Ala2Val Rett mutation

Taimoor I Sheikh 1,2, Alexia Martínez de Paz 3, Shamim Akhtar 4, Juan Ausió 3, John B Vincent 1,2,5,*
PMCID: PMC5886153  PMID: 28973632

Abstract

Methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), the mutated protein in Rett syndrome (RTT), is a crucial chromatin-modifying and gene-regulatory protein that has two main isoforms (MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_ E2) due to the alternative splicing and switching between translation start codons in exons one and two. Functionally, these two isoforms appear to be virtually identical; however, evidence suggests that only MeCP2_E1 is relevant to RTT, including a single RTT missense mutation in exon 1, Ala2Val. Here, we show that N-terminal co- and post-translational modifications differ for MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, which result in different protein degradation rates in vitro. We report complete N-methionine excision (NME) for MeCP2_E1 and evidence of excision of multiple alanine residues from the N-terminal polyalanine stretch. For MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, we observed only partial NME and N-acetylation (NA) of either methionine or valine. The localization of MeCP2_E1 and co-localization with chromatin appear to be unaffected by the Ala2Val mutation. However, a higher proteasomal degradation rate was observed for MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val compared with that for wild type MeCP2_E1. Thus, the etiopathology of Ala2Val is likely due to a reduced bio-availability of MeCP2 because of the faster degradation rate of the unmodified defective protein. Our data on the effects of the Ala2Val mutation on N-terminal modifications of MeCP2 may be applicable to Ala2Val mutations in other disease genes for which no etiopathological mechanism has been established.

Introduction

Methyl-CpG-binding protein-2, MeCP2, was originally identified by its ability to bind methylated DNA (1,2). Mutations in the MECP2 gene were later identified to be the cause of Rett syndrome (RTT) (3). At that time, MeCP2 was thought to be encoded by only three exons; however, an upstream non-coding first exon and a putative promoter were subsequently identified (4). The translation start site for this transcript (now termed MECP2_E2) is in the second of the four exons, and exon 1 and most of exon 2 are within the 5′ untranslated region (UTR). However, in a splice variant of MECP2, termed MECP2_E1, exon 2 is spliced out and translation is initiated from a start codon in exon 1, thus resulting in a slightly larger protein (by 12 amino acids) with a different N-terminal end (5,6). The remainder of the protein is identical in the two isoforms, and both contain the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) and transcriptional repressor domain (TRD) (7). The MeCP2_E2 isoform has been the more widely studied, and in humans, it has 486 residues and a molecular mass of ∼53 kDa. However, MeCP2_E1 is slightly larger with 498 amino acids. Studies suggest that the mRNA expression of MECP2_E1 is higher in brain regions than that of MECP2_ E2 (5,6) and that the former is the predominant isoform in the brain, except for in the thalamus (8,9).

Overall, the N-terminal domain (NTD) of MeCP2 (Fig. 1A) is uncharacterized and intrinsically disordered (10) but is highly conserved across all vertebrate groups and is identical among many higher mammalian species (11). Interestingly, among the non-mammalian vertebrate groups, only the MeCP2_E1 isoform has been identified thus far, suggesting that this isoform is the evolutionary precursor (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MeCP2 N-terminal domain (NTD) sequence of wild type MeCP2_E1, Ala2Val (A2V) and E2, and the effect of NTD mutation MeCP2_E1 A2V on the translocation and localization of the protein. (A) Amino acid sequence of the MeCP2 NTD; residue counted as in (7) of the mutant MeCP2_E1-A2V and wild type MeCP2_E1/E2. (B) XY Image stacks of neuronally differentiated SK-N-SH (human neuroblastoma) cells that transiently expressed the full-length MeCP2 _E1 and mutant (A2V), representing the co-localization at chromocenters (DAPI; column 1) and the recombinant GFP-tagged protein (column 2) and the merge of 1 and 2 (column 3). (C) Mean of the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) values (MeCP2-WT n = 11 and MeCP2-A2V n = 15 cells; ±SD shown) of the wild type and mutant. (D) Scatter plot of blue and green pixel intensities, showing the co-localization of DNA (DAPI) and recombinant MeCP2 protein (GFP), respectively.

Studies suggest that both isoforms might have strongly overlapping functions but with spatial and temporal differences in the transcript abundance (8,12). Complementation studies have shown that the two isoforms are able to substitute for each other and fulfill the same basic functions in the mouse brain (12). However, while the isoform-specific knockout of Mecp2_e1 in mice recapitulates RTT-like features, the Mecp2_e2-specific knockout does not (13,14). The functional role of the N-terminus of either isoform has currently not been identified. The presence of missense mutations in relation to disease is a good indicator of a functional role, and these are frequently useful for developing strategies to elucidate function. However, to date, the only exon 1 missense mutation identified in RTT patients is Ala2Val, which has been identified in four RTT girls and one patient diagnosed with intellectual disability (15,16) (Rettbase entries ID # 6622 and 6622; & J. B. Vincent, unpublished data). This mutation would affect the E1 isoform only, leaving the E2 isoform untouched.

The removal of N-terminal methionine (NM) residues and N-terminal acetylation (NA) are the two most common protein modifications that occur either co-translationally or post-translationally (17). Methionine aminopeptidase 2 (MetAP) is the enzyme that cleaves the NM. The NM is the translational product of the start AUG codon, which is typically present only transiently on nascent protein, and its efficient removal is influenced by the penultimate residues. NM excision (NME) is much more common with smaller penultimate residues (≤ 1.29 Å radius); however, NM can be completely or partially retained if the penultimate amino acid has an intermediate-sized side chain (18). In ribosomal proteins that retain the NM, the second amino acid typically has a side chain of an intermediate size, and valine is often found at this position (19). Based on a large-scale proteomic analysis, methionine cleavage is less efficient and less likely when the second position amino acid is valine compared to when the second position is alanine (20). Overall, 100% NME has been reported in proteins with alanine at the penultimate position, whereas NME is reduced to 50% in proteins with valine at the penultimate position. An analysis of peptides with Val or Thr at the penultimate position has found NM to be less efficiently cleaved than in those with Ala, Cys, Gly, Pro or Ser in vitro (20).

The addition of an acetyl group at the N-terminal residue (N-terminal acetylation; NA) usually follows directly from the removal of the NM. Among all acetylated peptides, those with a penultimate alanine are most common. However, NA cannot be definitively predicted based on the presence of Ala or Ser as terminal residues or the primary amino acid sequence (17). NA may influence the protein stability by preventing N-terminal ubiquitination (21) and may also reflect on the protein localization (22) and function. Conversely, some N-terminal acetylated proteins were found to generate a degradation signal for an ubiquitin protein known as Dao10 (23).

As the MeCP2_E1 NTD has no known ascribed function, we hypothesize that the Ala2Val mutation may therefore promote the retention of the NM and the reduction of NA, leading to either a reduced lifespan and/or the mislocalization of the protein. The resulting reduced bio-availability of MeCP2_E1 in girls with the Ala2Val mutation leads to RTT or similar phenotypes. Here, we studied the NME and NA of MeCP2_E1 and the Ala2Val mutant MeCP2_E1 to provide a molecular link between the mutation and the disease.

Results

Translocation and chromatin localization of MeCP2 WT and Ala2Val protein

To analyze the effect of the Ala2Val mutation on the MeCP2-DNA interaction, we expressed C-terminal GFP-fusion protein versions of the full-length MeCP2_E1 WT and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val in differentiated SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells (also in mouse C2C12 myoblast cells, chosen based on the negligible expression of endogenous MeCP2 and prominent chromocenters (24,25)). In both cell lines the visual analyses of the merged images of DAPI and GFP revealed no difference in the localization of the WT and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val protein. Pearson co-localization coefficient (PCC) values of both the MeCP2_E1 WT and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val showed high positive correlations with rp -values of 0.81 and 0.85, respectively (Fig. 1B and C and Supplementary Material, Fig. S2).

In vitro co-/post-translational processing of WT and mutant (Ala2Val) MeCP2 protein

The NTDs of MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val were expressed in HEK293T cells to allow for possible N-terminal in vitro modifications in a mammalian cell system, and were subsequently affinity purified (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3). For WT MeCP2_E1, the mass spectrometry analysis found no peptides with NM, indicating complete NME at the P1 position (first residue). Moreover, acetylation of the first alanine (P'1) after NME was observed (Fig. 2A). Additionally, we observed several reads with the excision of the first two, three, four or six residues (i.e. methionine (P1) and one, two, three or five alanines (P'1 to P'5) and acetylation of the subsequent alanine) (Fig. 2A). Unlike WT MeCP2_E1, in sequencing MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, reads with no NME (P1) but with acetylation of the N-terminal methionine (P1) (Fig. 2B) were detected. Additionally, a read with NME (P1) and acetylation of the penultimate valine (P'1) was also observed (Fig. 2B). Additionally few reads without acetylation of P’1 valine were found (Fig. 2B) and one read with excision of first three residues were found. For MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, we also observed some evidence of NM oxidation (data not shown). All post-translational modifications (PTMs) reported received Ascores of ≥1000.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mass spectrometry sequencing of the N-terminal of the MeCP2 protein (in vitro). N-terminal peptide coverage alignment chart and high-resolution mass spectra, showing N-methionine excision (NME) and N-acetylation (NA) of the N-terminus of (A) MeCP2_E1; (B) MeCP2_E1-p.A2V. NA (+42 Da) of N-terminus amino acid is shown highlighted in yellow.

Proteasomal degradation of MeCP2

To test cell survival post- cycloheximide (CHX) treatment, a cell imaging approach was used. 10 µg/ml concentration of CHX were used in all experiments (26). Transfected SK-N-SH cells with wild type MeCP2_E1-GFP fusion protein and treated with CHX were imaged at 0, 24, 48 h using wavelength channels 410/488/570 nm to image total, transfected, and dead cells, respectively. Average total cells per image (n = 6) after 0, 24 and 48 h of CHX treatment were 329, 423 and 372 respectively. The mean percentage of dead cells after 0, 24 and 48 h of CHX treatment were 3.03 ± 1.5, 4.6 ± 1.8 and 4.6 ± 1.2, respectively. The mean percentage of GFP (MeCP2_E1) transfected cells after 0, 24 and 48 h of CHX treatment were 13.6 ± 3.6, 7.8 ± 3.6 and 4.2 ± 2.8, respectively. To study the protein half-lives of MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, we conducted CHX chase assays. For these assays, SH-SY5Y and SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells expressing recombinant WT MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val GFP fusion protein were used (see Materials and Methods). Low levels of the MeCP2_E1 WT protein were detected in the post-48 h CHX treated cells; however, no protein was detected in the mutant cells expressing MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val 48 h after the CHX treatment in SH-SY5Y cells, in three of the four replicate experiments (Supplementary Material, Fig. S4). In similar experiments in SK-N-SH cells, lower levels of MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val protein were also observed compared to the wild type MeCP2_E1 protein (Fig. 3F, last row).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cell viability and cycloheximide (CHX) chase assays. (A) Representative confocal image of SK-N-SH cells treated with 10 µg/mL cycloheximide (merged images, 10X4 objective, 512X512 resolution). Blue (Hoechst 33342) for total cell staining, Red (propidium iodide) for dead nuclei staining and green channel for WT MeCP2_E1-GFP. (B) Graphical representation of averaged total cells of CHX-treated cells for 0, 24 and 48 h; (C) Average percent dead cells (blue/red merged) (D) Average percent transfected (WT-MeCP2_E1-GFP) cells (from B-C n = 6, ±error bars = SD). (E) Western blot (WB) analysis of CHX treated SH-SY5Y cells harvested after 0 (lane 1), 24 (lane 2) and 48 h (lane 3), using anti-GFP and anti-actin antibodies; (F) WB analysis of the CHX treated SK-N-SH cells harvested after 0 (lane 1), 24 (lane 2) and 48 h (lane 3), using anti-GFP and anti-tubulin antibodies. Replicate WBs are shown in Supplementary Material, Figure S4.

Real-time mobility dynamics, degradation rates and half-life of WT and mutant (Ala2Val) MeCP2 protein in living cells

To further study the mobility and binding dynamics of the WT and Ala2Val mutant MeCP2 protein, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays were performed. Figure 4A shows the pre-bleach, bleached and post-bleached recovery images. Surprisingly, MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val showed a slower recovery compared to WT. WT MeCP2_E1 begins to show some recovery in the 30th frame, and stronger normalized recovery was observed by the 100th frame, relative to Ala2Val (Fig. 4A). The quantitative mean FRAP curves showed a relatively slower fluorescent recovery of Ala2Val compared with that of the WT MeCP2_E1 (Fig. 4B). To calculate the real-time degradation rates (α) and t-half time, we performed real-time bleach-chase experiments (27,28). HEK293T cells expressing full-length MeCP2_E1-WT and Ala2Val were used in these experiments. Bleached and unbleached cells were captured using automated time-lapse imaging for a period of 7 h as described in Materials and Methods. The protein degradation rates or removal rates (α) were calculated by considering the slope of the difference between the bleached, Pv(t), and unbleached, P(t) protein fluorescence on a semi-logarithmic plot using a linear regression as follows:

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Live cell Real-Time dynamics, degradation rates and half-life of the MeCP2 protein. (A) FRAP assays, showing the recovery at different time points. (B) Fluorescent recovery of MeCP2 wild type and p.A2V. Averaged recovered intensities were plotted as a function of time from 299 image stacks (512 × 512) (SEM bar shown on every 10th value; n = 5). (C) Bleach chase of MeCP2_E1 WT and A2V. Real-time protein recovery slope of bleached, Pv(t), and unbleached P(t) cell with the function of time (7 h). (D) Protein degradation rates or removal rates (α) of the same cells shown in C. (E) Protein half-life and degradation rates calculated by taking the slope of the difference between the Pv(t) and P(t) protein fluorescence on a semi-logarithmic plot using a linear regression (ln(Pt-Pvt) (28).

(ln(P(t)-Pv(t)) (28).We observed a higher decay rate for the MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val protein compared with that of the WT (Fig. 4C and D). For the WT, the numeric values of the protein degradation rate (α (1/h)) and t-half time were 0.014 ± 0.002 and 50.7 ± 3.5, respectively, whereas, for Ala2Val, the numeric values of the protein degradation rate (α (1/h)) and t-half time were 0.038 ± 0.002 and 18.3 ± 0.45, respectively (Fig. 4E).

Discussion

Both human MetAPs (MetAP1 and MetAP2) preferentially cleave the N-terminal methionine of peptides, which have small penultimate residues (i.e. Gly, Ala, Ser, Cys, Pro, Thr and Val), but MetAP2 has a two-fold higher cleavage activity than MetAP1 for peptides with Met-Val and Met-Thr residues at the N-terminus (29). Our findings suggest that the MeCP2_E1 Ala2Val substitution may alter the MetAP enzyme usage for NME (i.e. switching to MetAP2 to cleave MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val). In addition, reduced NME has been observed in peptides with Val or Thr at the penultimate position compared with that in peptides with Ala, Cys, Gly, Pro or Ser at the penultimate position (20). In our results, we have observed a 100% NME of the MeCP2_E1 peptides, whereas NME for MeCPE1-Ala2Val was reduced, which was consistent with our predictions based on previous observations (20,30). Additionally, for MeCP2_E1, we have also observed evidence of ‘chew back’ up to and including the first (P'1), second (P'2), third (P'3) and fifth (P'5) alanine residues of the seven-alanine polyalanine stretch after NM (P1 position). This result shows that in addition to NME, subsequent residues of MeCP2_E1 up to at least P’5 can be cleaved to generate variable N-termini. To the best of our knowledge, the cleavage of the penultimate residues in human proteins has not been reported previously. At this point, we can only speculate that such ‘chewed back’ species of MeCP2_E1 may generate subpopulations possessing different dynamics and/or stability/longevity.

N-terminal acetylation of proteins, either with or without NME, is a common modification that involves 80–90% of human proteins (31). Several studies have described different roles of N-Ac, such as 1) regulation of cytoskeletal actomyosin interactions (32), 2) the targeting of GTPases to Golgi (33), 3) targeting to the inner nuclear membrane in yeast (34), 4) inhibition of the translocation of the protein to the endoplasmic reticulum (35), 5) acetylation of Sir3, which is required for binding to unmethylated Histone 3 Lys79, highlighting its role in gene silencing (36), 6) ubiquitination antagonist (21) and 7) as a degradation signal that is targeted by Dao10 E3 ubiquitin ligase (23) to promote degradation.

As it has been demonstrated that NA can affect protein localization and/or function (22), to exclude the possibility that the Ala2Val mutation may affect nuclear translocation or chromatin localization of MeCP2, we performed co-localization experiments and calculated PCC values of MeCP2_E1-WT versus mutant MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val (CT-GFP) and DNA (DAPI) (Fig. 1B–D). No significant difference in the protein-chromocenter localization was noted, indicating that mislocalization of protein is unlikely to be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Ala2Val. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the average number and size of chromocenters in cells transfected with the WT and mutant MeCP2_E1 constructs, which rules out an effect of the mutation on the clustering and overall chromatin organization (24).

In order to investigate the effect of the Ala2Val mutation on MeCP2 degradation or half-life, we conducted CHX chase experiments in which further protein translation is prevented by CHX, and MeCP2 protein degradation was monitored over time (23). In both the neuronal cell lines tested, WT E1 was present even at 48 h post-CHX treatment. However, E1-Ala2Val was completely degraded by 48 h in the post-treatment cells (Fig. 3A and C).

The bleach-chase assays, which measured the protein removal in live cells through intracellular degradation and cell growth (27,28), showed higher removal/degradation of MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val compared to that of the WT (Fig. 4C–E), corroborating the results of the CHX assays. Since MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val shows normal localization at chromocenters (Fig. 1A and B), the slower FRAP recovery time observed suggests that the equilibrium of chromatin-bound versus unbound MeCP2 has shifted as a result of its higher degradation rate. An optimum supply of correctly folded and modified MeCP2 protein is required for its role in the regulation of gene transcription, and either too little or too much MeCP2 is known to have pathogenic consequences (37,38). Thus, disruption of the availability of MeCP2 in the nucleus through defective co-/post-translational N-terminal modifications that lead to a faster degradation is likely to lead to dysregulation of many other essential genes, which, in turn, leads to the Rett phenotype.

Interestingly, Ala2Val mutations have been reported in many other disease genes, such as DKCX in X-linked dyskeratosis congenita (DKC1; MIM 305000) (39), ECHS1 in mitochondrial enoyl-CoA hydratase 1 deficiency (MIM 616277) (40), IRF6 in Van der Woude syndrome (MIM 119300) (41,42), SMN1 in autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy (MIM 253300) and TNNI3 in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy type 7 (MIM 613690) (43). However, the etiopathological mechanism(s) have never been explained (39–43). Thus, the mechanistic information gained for MeCP2_E1 Ala2Val may be applicable to other diseases.

Materials and Methods

Cloning, mutagenesis, cell culture and transfections

C2C12 mouse myoblast cells (ATCC CRL-1772TM) and HEK293T human embryonic kidney cells (ATCC CRL-3216TM) (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were used in different experiments. Full-length and NTD mammalian expression human MeCP2_E1 C-terminal GFP-tagged clones were prepared using vector systems, such as pcDNA3.1TM CT and pDEST47TM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The Ala2Val mutation (hg19: chrX: 153363118G>A; NM_001110792.1: c.5C>T) was introduced through PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Quikchange Lightning site-directed mutagenesis kit, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) using oligos ATVL-CTTCGTCCGGAAAATGGTCGCCGCC and ATVR-GGCGGCGACCATTTTCCGGACGAAG. The WT and Ala2Val MeCP2_E1-GFP fusion proteins were expressed in either C2C12 or HEK293T cells transfected with polyethylenimine transfection reagent (jetPEI®, PolyPlus, Illkirch, France) and PolyFect (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), respectively, following the manufacturers’ instructions. The neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-SH was directed towards neuronal differentiation by incubation with 10 µM retinoic acid (44) before transfection with LipofectamineTM 3000 following the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).

Cell harvesting and protein extraction

Two 150 mm plates of HEK293T cells at 80–90% confluence were used for each affinity-purification (AP) in the mass spectrometry (MS) experiments.

The cells were washed with 500 μL of ice-cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) in each 150 mm plate and harvested with a soft sterile cell scraper. The cell pellets were washed three times by resuspending the cells gently in ice-cold PBS and centrifuging at 1500g at 4 °C for 5 min. The cell pellets were stored at -80 °C until use.

For the protein isolation, the pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP40, 10% glycerol, 0.25 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 1 mM NaF and 1 mM DTT) in each plate used and incubated on ice for 30 min. The cell debris was spun for 15 min at >14–16 000g at 4 °C. In total, 10 U DNAses I per ml of lysate (Fermentas) were added. The protein concentrations were quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (PierceTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The concentration of the protein in the lysate is typically ∼5–10 mg/ml. An aliquot of lysate was also collected for the western blot analysis.

Gel-free affinity purification/immunoprecipitation and trypsin digestion for mass spectrometry

For the gel-free GFP-purification, monovalent matrix agarose Nanobeads GFP-Trap® (ChromoTek, Planegg, Germany) were used according to the manufacturer's instruction but with the following modification (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3). Proteins were eluted 2-3 times with three bead volumes of elution buffer (0.5 M NH4OH, pH 11.0–12.0 (Sigma), 0.5 mM EDTA) at 4 °C with end-over-end agitation for 15 min. The eluates were lyophilized in a centrifugal evaporator. The purified proteins were run on a 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel, followed by western blotting using an anti-GFP antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) to analyze the purity and assess the molecular size (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3A and B). Prior to the mass spectrometry, the protein samples were trypsin-digested by resuspending the protein in 50 mM NH4HCO3 (pH 8.3) and 1/10th volume of a solution of 45 mM DTT. The samples were incubated at 60 °C for 30 min and allowed to cool to room temperature (RT), and then, 1/10th of the volume of 100 mM iodoacetamide was added and incubated at RT in the dark for 15 min. The samples were then digested overnight at 37 °C with 0.75 μg of porcine trypsin, and an additional 0.75 μg of trypsin was added the next day to continue the digestion for another 3 hours. The samples were lyophilized and stored at -80 °C until use in the mass spectrometry experiment.

Mass spectrometry to determine the MeCP2 PTMs

The protein samples were digested overnight at 37 °C with trypsin at a 50:1 protein:enzyme ratio. After desalting the peptide mixtures using C18 reverse phase columns, the tryptic peptides were loaded onto a 50 cm × 75 μm ID column with RSLC 2 μm C18 packing material (EASY-Spray, Thermo-Fisher, Odense, Denmark) with an integrated emitter. The peptides were eluted into a Q-Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) using an Easy-Spray nLC 1000 chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with a 1 h gradient from 0% to 35% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. The mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode with 1 mass spectrometry (MS) spectrum, followed by 10 MS/MS spectra. The MS was acquired with a resolution of 70 000 FWHM (full width at half maximum), a target of 1 × 106 ions and a maximum scan time of 120 ms. The MS/MS scans were acquired with a resolution of 17 500 FWHM, a target of 1 × 106 ions and a maximum scan time of 120 ms using a relative collision energy of 27%. A dynamic exclusion time of 15 s was used for the MS/MS scans. The raw data files were acquired with an Xcalibur 2.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and processed with the PEAKS 7 search engine (Bioinformatics Solutions, Waterloo, ON) using a database consisting of the wild type and mutant constructs of MeCP2. The identified peptides and PTMs were assigned Ascores by the PEAKS software.

Cell fixation and confocal imaging

For the fixed cell imaging, the cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by two washes with ice-cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and the transfected cells were then counter stained with DAPI (4′-6′-diamidino-2-phenylindol). Confocal microscopy was used to study the colocalization of MeCP2 accumulation at chromocenters. Z-stacks were acquired with a frame size of 512 x 512 pixels using the GFP488 and DAPI405 channels.

Single cell nuclei identification

The identification of the nuclei of single cells and chromocenters was performed by intensity-based thresholding and the implementation of the Water algorithm (45). Chromocenters and GFP-fusion protein co-localization images were captured by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV-1200) using a 63×/1.3 NA oil objective at 405 nm diode pumped solid state for DAPI, and 488 nm argon for GFP.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

To study the protein recovery and dynamics in living cells, MeCP2_E1 WT and mutant (Ala2Val) were expressed in transfected C2C12 cells in chambered cover glass culture plates (Nunc™; NalgeNunc, Rochester, NY). The FRAP assay was used to capture the recovery and diffusion dynamics. Five independent FRAP experiments in temperature (37 °C) and CO2 (5%) controlled incubation chambers were performed on the WT and mutant recombinant proteins in the C2C12 cells.

For the time-lapse imaging, a series of confocal time-lapse images of frames (512 × 512 pixels) imaged at 488 nm laser excitation with 0.05 transmission were used to record the GFP-tagged protein post-bleach recovery. The FRAP assays were recorded with a minimum of 25 pre-bleach frames, 200 µs bleach time with 405 nm laser line at 100% transmission, and 299 post-bleach frames were recorded at equal time intervals.

Cell viability test

SK-N-SH cells were treated with 10 µg/mL CHX in complete media Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) ATCC. Cell were stained with blue (Hoechst 33342) for total cell staining and red (propidium iodide) (LIVE/DEAD™ Cell Imaging Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) after 0, 24 and 48 h following the manufecturer’ instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Cells were imaged using 488/570 channels and data were analysed using Image J software.

Cycloheximide chase assay

SK-N-SH and SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were transfected with MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val cloned in the GFP fusion expression vectors as described above. The cells were seeded one day before transfection in the culture dishes. After 24 h, the cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). At 48 h post-transfection, the cells were treated with 10 µg/mL of CHX and harvested after 0, 24 and 48 h. The cell lysates were prepared using 10 mM Tris/Cl pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.5 mM EDTA; 0.5% NP-40, 0.02% Thimerosal (preservative) lysis buffer. Denaturing SDS-PAGE followed by western blot analysis was used to detect the GFP-fused recombinant protein using an anti-GFP tag antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). All experiments were conducted in four replicates to confirm the reproducibility.

Real-time bleach-chase assays

To study the protein degradation/removal rate and real-time half-life in living cells, MeCP2_E1 WT and mutant (Ala2Val) were expressed and transfected into HEK293T cells in 35 mm dishes with No. 1.5 coverslips (MatTek Corporation MA USA). All bleach-chase experiments were conducted in temperature (37 °C)- and CO2 (5%)-controlled incubation chambers.

A series of confocal time-lapse images at 20x resolution (frame size of 512 × 512 pixels) were captured at 488 nm laser excitation with 0.05 transmission. Half of the cells in the field of objective were bleached using a 405-nm laser for 250 frames (200 µs bleach time per frame). The time-lapse images of the visible fluorescent protein after bleaching (bleached cell, Pv(t)) and the total fluorescent protein (unbleached cells, P(t)) were recorded for ∼7 h (a total of 105 frames) with ∼4-min intervals.

Data analysis

The Olympus FluoView (FV1200) software was used to captured the cell images and calculate the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) for the co-localization of the chromocenters (DAPI) and recombinant protein (GFP). A MATLAB-based Windows application, easyFRAP (46), was used to analyze the FRAP data. The descriptive statistical data analysis was calculated using Microsoft Excel and two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, and the P-values for statistical significance were calculated using GraphPadTM software online tools.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material is available at HMG online.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the assistance of Michael Moran and Paul Taylor from the SPARC BioCentre at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, in interpreting the AP-MS data.

Conflict of Interest statement. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (JBV) holds a patent, and receives royalties, related to diagnostic screening of MECP2. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ontario Rett Syndrome Association (ORSA) to JV and JA, by donations made to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation, and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant (MOP -130417) to JA. TIS was supported by awards from the Dalton Whitebread Scholarship Fund, University of Toronto open fellowship and from the Margaret and Howard Gamble Research Grant.

References

  • 1. Lewis J.D., Meehan R.R., Henzel W.J., Maurer-Fogy I., Jeppesen P., Klein F., Bird A. (1992) Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA. Cell, 69, 905–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Meehan R., Lewis J.D., Bird A.P. (1992) Characterization of MeCP2, a vertebrate DNA binding protein with affinity for methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 5085–5092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Amir R.E., Van den Veyver I.B., Wan M., Tran C.Q., Francke U., Zoghbi H.Y. (1999) Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet., 23, 185–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Reichwald K., Thiesen J., Wiehe T., Weitzel J., Strätling W.H., Kioschis P., Poustka A., Rosenthal A., Platzer M. (2000) Comparative sequence analysis of the MECP2-locus in human and mouse reveals new transcribed regions. Mamm. Genome, 11, 182–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mnatzakanian G.N., Lohi H., Munteanu I., Alfred S.E., Yamada T., MacLeod P.J.M., Jones J.R., Scherer S.W., Schanen N.C., Friez M.J., Vincent J.B., Minassian B.A. (2004) A previously unidentified MECP2 open reading frame defines a new protein isoform relevant to Rett syndrome. Nat. Genet., 36, 339–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kriaucionis S., Bird A. (2004) The major form of MeCP2 has a novel N‐terminus generated by alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1818–1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sheikh T.I., Mittal K., Willis M.J., Vincent J.B. (2013) A synonymous change, p. Gly16Gly in MECP2 Exon 1, causes a cryptic splice event in a Rett syndrome patient. Orphanet J. Rare Dis., 8, 108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dragich J., Houwink-Manville I., Schanen C. (2000) Rett syndrome: a surprising result of mutation in MECP2. Hum.Mol. Genet., 9, 2365–2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dragich J.M., Kim Y.H., Arnold A.P., Schanen N.C. (2007) Differential distribution of the MeCP2 splice variants in the postnatal mouse brain. J. Comp. Neurol., 501, 526–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hite K.C., Adams V.H., Hansen J.C. (2009) Recent advances in MeCP2 structure and function. Biochem. Cell Biol., 87, 219–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Harvey C.G., Menon S.D., Stachowiak B., Noor A., Proctor A., Mensah A.K., Mnatzakanian G.N., Alfred S.E., Guo R., Scherer S.W.. et al. (2007) Sequence variants within exon 1 of MECP2 occur in females with mental retardation. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet., 144B, 355–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kerr B., Soto J., Saez M., Abrams A., Walz K., Young J.I. (2012) Transgenic complementation of MeCP2 deficiency: phenotypic rescue of Mecp2-null mice by isoform-specific transgenes. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 20, 69–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yasui D.H., Gonzales M.L., Aflatooni J.O., Crary F.K., Hu D.J., Gavino B.J., Golub M.S., Vincent J.B., Schanen N.C., Olson C.O., Rastegar M., Lasalle J.M. (2014) Mice with an isoform-ablating Mecp2 exon 1 mutation recapitulate the neurologic deficits of Rett syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet., 23, 2447–2458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Itoh M., Tahimic C.G., Ide S., Otsuki A., Sasaoka T., Noguchi S., Oshimura M., Goto Y-i., Kurimasa A. (2012) Methyl CpG-binding protein isoform MeCP2_e2 is dispensable for Rett syndrome phenotypes but essential for embryo viability and placenta development. J.Biol. Chem., 287, 13859–13867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fichou Y., Nectoux J., Bahi-Buisson N., Rosas-Vargas H., Girard B., Chelly J., Bienvenu T. (2009) The first missense mutation causing Rett syndrome specifically affecting the MeCP2_e1 isoform. Neurogenet., 10, 127–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Saunders C.J., Minassian B.E., Chow E.W., Zhao W., Vincent J.B. (2009) Novel exon 1 mutations in MECP2 implicate isoform MeCP2_e1 in classical Rett syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A, 149A, 1019–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Polevoda B., Sherman F. (2000) Nα-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 36479–36482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sherman F., Stewart J.W., Tsunasawa S. (1985) Methionine or not methionine at the beginning of a protein. Bioessays, 3, 27–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Arnold R.J., Reilly J.P. (1999) Observation of Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins and their posttranslational modifications by mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem., 269, 105–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Frottin F., Martinez A., Peynot P., Mitra S., Holz R.C., Giglione C., Meinnel T. (2006) The proteomics of N-terminal methionine cleavage. Mol. Cell.Proteomics, 5, 2336–2349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ciechanover A., Ben-Saadon R. (2004) N-terminal ubiquitination: more protein substrates join in. Trends Cell Biol., 14, 103–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jackson C.L. (2004) N-terminal acetylation targets GTPases to membranes. Nature Cell Biol., 6, 379–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hwang C.-S., Shemorry A., Varshavsky A. (2010) N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science, 327, 973–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sheikh T.I., Ausió J., Faghfoury H., Silver J., Lane J.B., Eubanks J.H., MacLeod P., Percy A.K., Vincent J.B. (2016) From Function to Phenotype: impaired DNA binding and clustering correlates with clinical severity in males with missense mutations in MECP2. Sci. Rep., 6, 38590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Agarwal N., Becker A., Jost K.L., Haase S., Thakur B.K., Brero A., Hardt T., Kudo S., Leonhardt H., Cardoso M.C. (2011) MeCP2 Rett mutations affect large scale chromatin organization. Hum. Mol. Genet., 20, 4187–4195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Xia M., Huang R., Witt K.L., Southall N., Fostel J., Cho M.-H., Jadhav A., Smith C.S., Inglese J., Portier C.J. (2008) Compound cytotoxicity profiling using quantitative high-throughput screening. Environ. Health Perspect., 116, 284–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Eden E., Geva-Zatorsky N., Issaeva I., Cohen A., Dekel E., Danon T., Cohen L., Mayo A., Alon U. (2011) Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells. Science, 331, 764–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Geva-Zatorsky N., Issaeva I., Mayo A., Cohen A., Dekel E., Danon T., Cohen L., Liron Y., Alon U., Eden E. (2012) Using bleach-chase to measure protein half-lives in living cells. Nat. Protoc., 7, 801–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Xiao Q., Zhang F., Nacev B.A., Liu J.O., Pei D. (2010) Protein N-terminal processing: substrate specificity of Escherichia coli and human methionine aminopeptidases. Biochemistry, 49, 5588–5599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Helbig A.O., Gauci S., Raijmakers R., van Breukelen B., Slijper M., Mohammed S., Heck A.J. (2010) Profiling of N-acetylated protein termini provides in-depth insights into the N-terminal nature of the proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 9, 928–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Silva R.D., Martinho R.G. (2015) Developmental roles of protein N‐terminal acetylation. Proteomics, 15, 2402–2409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Coulton A.T., East D.A., Galinska-Rakoczy A., Lehman W., Mulvihill D.P. (2010) The recruitment of acetylated and unacetylated tropomyosin to distinct actin polymers permits the discrete regulation of specific myosins in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci., 123, 3235–3243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Behnia R., Panic B., Whyte J.R., Munro S. (2004) Targeting of the Arf-like GTPase Arl3p to the Golgi requires N-terminal acetylation and the membrane protein Sys1p. Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 405–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Murthi A., Hopper A.K. (2005) Genome-wide screen for inner nuclear membrane protein targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 170, 1553–1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Forte G.M.A., Pool M.R., Stirling C.J., Walter P. (2011) N-terminal acetylation inhibits protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol., 9, e1001073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. van Welsem T., Frederiks F., Verzijlbergen K.F., Faber A.W., Nelson Z.W., Egan D.A., Gottschling D.E., van Leeuwen F. (2008) Synthetic lethal screens identify gene silencing processes in yeast and implicate the acetylated amino terminus of Sir3 in recognition of the nucleosome core. Mol. Cell. Biol., 28, 3861–3872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Collins A.L., Levenson J.M., Vilaythong A.P., Richman R., Armstrong D.L., Noebels J.L., Sweatt J.D., Zoghbi H.Y. (2004) Mild overexpression of MeCP2 causes a progressive neurological disorder in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet., 13, 2679–2689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ramocki M.B., Tavyev Y.J., Peters S.U. (2010) The MECP2 duplication syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A, 152A, 1079–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Safa W., Lestringant G., Frossard P. (2001) X-linked dyskeratosis congenita: restrictive pulmonary disease and a novel mutation. Thorax, 56, 891–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sakai C., Yamaguchi S., Sasaki M., Miyamoto Y., Matsushima Y., Goto Y-i. (2015) ECHS1 mutations cause combined respiratory chain deficiency resulting in Leigh syndrome. Hum. Mut., 36, 232–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kondo S., Schutte B.C., Richardson R.J., Bjork B.C., Knight A.S., Watanabe Y., Howard E., de Lima R.L.F., Daack-Hirsch S., Sander A. i(2002) Mutations in IRF6 cause Van der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes. Nat. Genet., 32, 285–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. de Lima R.L.L.F., Hoper S.A., Ghassibe M., Cooper M.E., Rorick N.K., Kondo S., Katz L., Marazita M.L., Compton J., Bale S.. et al. (2009) Prevalence and nonrandom distribution of exonic mutations in interferon regulatory factor 6 in 307 families with Van der Woude syndrome and 37 families with popliteal pterygium syndrome. Genet. Med., 11, 241–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Murphy R.T., Mogensen J., Shaw A., Kubo T., Hughes S., McKenna W.J. (2004) Novel mutation in cardiac troponin I in recessive idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet, 363, 371–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Sidell N., Sarafian T., Kelly M., Tsuchida T., Haussler M. (1986) Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of human neuroblastoma: a cell variant system showing two distinct responses. Pathobiol. Expl. Cell. Biol., 54, 287–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Harmon B., Sedat J. (2005) Cell-by-cell dissection of gene expression and chromosomal interactions reveals consequences of nuclear reorganization. PLoS Biol., 3, e67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Rapsomaniki M.A., Kotsantis P., Symeonidou I.-E., Giakoumakis N.-N., Taraviras S., Lygerou Z. (2012) easyFRAP: an interactive, easy-to-use tool for qualitative and quantitative analysis of FRAP data. Bioinformatics, 28, 1800–1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures

Articles from Human Molecular Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES