Abstract
Recent comparative genomics studies have suggested that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is one of the major processes in bacterial evolution. In this study, HGT events of 64 Chlamydia strains were investigated based on the pipeline employed in HGTree database constructed in our recent study. Tree reconciliation method was applied in order to calculate feasible HGT events. Following initial detection and an evaluation procedure, evidence of the HGT was identified in 548 gene families including 42 gene families transferred from outside of Chlamydiae phylum with high reliability. The donor species of inter-phylum HGT consists of 12 different bacterial and archaeal phyla, suggesting that Chlamydia might have even more various host range than in previous reports. In addition, each species of Chlamydia showed varying preference towards HGT, and genes engaged in HGT within Chlamydia and between other species showed different functional distribution. Also, examination of individual gene flows of niche-specific genes suggested that many of such genes are transferred mainly within Chlamydia genus. Our results uncovered novel features of HGT acting on Chlamydia genome evolution, and it would be also strong evidence that HGT is an ongoing process for intracellular pathogens. We expect that the results provide more insight into lineage- and niche-specific adaptations regarding their infectivity and pathogenicity.
Introduction
Chlamydiae are a phylum of Gram-negative, obligate intracellular bacteria. They consist of four validly described groups (Waddila, Parachlamydia, Simkania, and Chlamydiaceae family) and five additional Candidatus families (Criblamydiaceae, Clavichlamydiaceae, Piscichlamydiaceae, Parilichlamydiaceae, and Rhabdochlamydiaceae) [1]. Waddila, Parachlamydia, and Simkania families have been detected as symbionts of protozoa and emerging pathogens causing infections in humans and animals, and Chlamydiaceae family includes 11 species capable of infecting mainly humans and a wide range of animal species [2, 3]. Chlamydiaceae family especially has significant impacts on human and animal health worldwide as it is successfully evolved to inhabit a wide spectrum of eukaryotic hosts, comprising from protozoa to placental mammals. The continuing discovery of new species infecting novel hosts and expanding host ranges of known species indicate importance of niche-specific gene acquisitions in Chlamydia [4].
Bacteria exchange their genetic information via horizontal gene transfer (HGT), and it has been considered to be one of a major driving force in the microbial evolution, with gene mutation [5, 6]. While accumulation of mutations is a slower process, HGT have a more substantial and immediate impact on the phenotypes of recipients [7]. Recent studies have also shown that horizontal acquisition of 'pathogenicity islands' directly change the virulent nature of many pathogenic bacteria [8]. HGT is known to occur via three modes: conjugation, transformation, phage-mediated transduction. The exact mechanism of HGT of Chlamydia is largely unknown, but previous laboratory works have reported that HGT and subsequent recombination can occur after co-infection within host body [9, 10]. Discovery of a number of phages has shown that phage-mediated transduction in Chlamydia is possible as well [11]. Traditionally, due to obligate intracellular nature and low chance of co-infections with more than one strain, however, HGT in Chlamydia had been considered unlikely. It has only recently become obvious that Chlamydia genomes contain full gene sets necessary for HGT [12]. Additional evidence for the occurrence of HGT was reported from studies on C. trachomatis strains in which it was discovered that they actively swap DNA even with strains infecting different parts of the body, and the recombination was not restricted to few “hotspots” [13]. Recent comparative studies detected traces of frequent HGT on several C. psittaci genomes as well [14].
Comparative genome analysis in many bacterial and archaeal studies have provided new insights into evolutionary history by exploring remnants of HGT events [15, 16]. In spite of their importance as global infectious diseases and increasing evidences of significant role of HGT, there has been only few exhaustive studies on gene transfer events in different Chlamydia species. In this study, we analyzed sets of homologous genes from 64 chlamydial strains from 8 different species and their homologs in 2,407 other prokaryotes using the pipeline employed in our previous study, HGTree database [17] to initially identify all putative HGT events that occurred within Chlamydiae and between Chlamydiae and non-chlamydial prokaryotes. HGTree is a comprehensive resource providing all feasible genome-wide HGT information for completely sequenced genomes of 2,472 prokaryotes (as of 17 March, 2015) by means of phylogenetic tree reconciliation method [17]. It is quite advantageous in inferring tree reconciliation-based HGT information with hundreds of organisms with a reasonable running time. Following initial identification of HGTs in Chlamydiae, in order to improve the accuracy of the identification, we additionally evaluated the reliability of each potential candidate HGT events and mapping assignments using RAxML [18] and RANGER-DTL 2.0 software package [19].
Tree reconciliation method is generally considered to be more powerful and sensitive in detecting HGT than distance-based methods [20], but it is computationally intensive and therefore its practical use has remained challenging for analysis of a large number of genomes [17]. Here, we provide extended insight into HGT in the evolution of Chlamydia by enabling this massive computation. We identified numerous feasible HGT events that has occurred in evolutionary lineages of Chlamydia. Donor organisms external to the Chlamydiae phylum were examined to have insights into the ecology of Chlamydia. We also examined gene flows of individual genes associated with chlamydia’s survival strategies in the host cell. We expect that the results presented in this work could explain how HGT have impact on niche- and lineage-specific evolution of Chlamydia.
Materials and methods
Chlamydial genomes used in this study
We used 64 completely sequenced chlamydial genomes representing 8 different species from the HGTree database for analysis (all available clinically isolated genomes of Chlamydia abortus, Chlamydia pecorum, Chlamydia psittaci, Chlamydia caviae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia felis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia muridarum). The list of 64 analyzed strains is presented in the S1 Table.
Identification of putative HGT events
In construction of HGTree [17], 2,472 completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes (156 Archaea and 2,316 Bacteria) were used. A total of 7,748,306 genes were scanned using HMMER (ver. 3.0) (E-value < 10–3) [21]. RNammer (ver.1.2) was applied to detect 16S rRNA sequences in each genome [22]. In order to predict homologous gene sets, Mestortho orthology detection algorithm (ver.2.0.) was used [23]. Multiple sequence alignments of homologous gene sets and 16S rRNA sequences from corresponding species in the homologs sets were performed using CLUSTAL Omega (ver.1.2.1) [24]. Finally, RANGER-DTL-U software (ver.1.0) was employed to calculate all putative HGT events by reconciliation of the generated gene trees to 16S rRNA species trees. All of the detected HGT events but HGTs between same species were deposited to the database [17]. In this study, an initial screening with HGTree was performed to identify all of the putative HGT events on 64 chalmydial strains, and the candidate HGTs were used for further analysis to evaluate reliability.
Evaluation of putative HGTs
To obtain HGTs with high reliability, additional analysis was applied following preliminary HGT detection with HGTree. Using RAxML [18], we reconstructed gene trees and species trees of 701 candidate homologs sets with history of HGTs, obtained from HGTree. For each RAxML analysis, we executed 100 rapid bootstrap inferences using GTR+CAT model for 16S rRNA genes and PROTCATJTT model for homologous gene sets. For species trees, 16S rRNA genes only from corresponding species in each set were used. 18S rRNA sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used in each species tree to root, and the sequence was removed using the Newick Utility (ver. 1.6) [25] after the species trees were generated. To evaluate candidate HGTs RANGER-DTL 2.0 [19] was applied. In contrast to RANGER-DTL 1.0, RANGER-DTL 2.0 is capable of sampling the space of all optimal reconciliations uniformly at random and computing multiple optimal reconciliations and accounting for the variability in optimal reconciliation scenarios [19]. Furthermore, to our knowledge, RANGER-DTL 2.0 is by far the only HGT detection program based on the tree reconciliation method that compute support values (SV) for individual DTL event inferences and species mapping assignments. After additional HGT detection with RANGER-DTL 2.0, total 3,004 HGT events in 669 genes were detected, and the average support value were 0.6463. In this study, we used support value cutoff of 0.9 to rule out ambiguous HGTs, and 1,030 HGTs in 548 genes were remained.
Functional category assignments of transferred genes
Detected genes were assigned to the NCBI clusters of orthologous group (COG) catalogue [26]. COGnizer software was used to examine in which The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways the transferred genes are associated [27].
Results & discussion
Analysis of donor lineages in HGT events
To investigate donor organisms of HGTs of 64 chlamydia strains, we inferred transfer events by reconciling each gene tree of 1,030 homologous gene sets to 2,472 completely sequenced prokaryotic species phylogenies. Following initial identification and evaluation procedure, we detected 1,030 highly reliable HGT events occurred between different species including Chlamydia for every gene family. It appeared that HGT has favorably occurred between species in the Chlamydiae phylum, but there was also a number of genes derived from organisms outside of the phylum. These organisms belong to 59 different genera, covering 12 bacterial and archaeal phyla which include a wide spectrum of life style (Fig 1). Numerous HGT events were subjected to occur between Chlamydia and Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, whereas Chlamydia barely received genes from organisms in Actinobacteria phylum. Various species-specific trends of HGT were also observed in each chlamydial species. For example, several species in phylum Firmicutes such as Bacillus anthracis CDC 684, Enterococcus faecium Aus 0085, and Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus TCH60 transferred genes only to C. psittaci, and absence of HGT to C. muridarum from several donor organisms in Bacteroidetes were observed (Fig 1).
Although many of donor organisms such as Neisseria meningitidis and Treponema pedis are known to be pathogenic to vertebrates or host associated, there exist other donor species which are typically considered as free-living bacteria including Isophaera pallida ATCC 43644, Methylacidiphilum infernorum V4, and Salinispira pacifica L21-RPU1-D2. First, for the donor species that occupy very similar niches as Chlamydia, many organisms residing and causing infections in respiratory system or urogenital organs in human or other animals were identified, in which most of the Chlamydia species are associated. Additionally, our result shows an occurrence of several HGTs with commensal organisms isolated from gastrointestinal (GI) tract of mammals. For example, ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase gene was transferred from Ureaplasma parvum which inhabit genital areas (SV: 1.0), and Enterococcus faecium transferred gene encoding ABC transporter family protein to C. psittaci (SV: 1.0). In previous study, it was discovered that not only Chlamydia can efficiently infect the GI tract of all hosts, including humans, but GI tract can also act as reservoir sites for chlamydial persistent infection [29, 30]. It has been reported that the GI tract is also considered to be a hot spot for HGT among bacteria [31].
In addition to bacteria residing in human or animal body sites, we observed a big proportion of environmental donor species which inhabit aquatic or terrestrial habitats (Fig 1). For instance, Lysyl-tRNA synthetase gene was transferred from aquatic bacteria, Caldilinea aerophile (SV: 0.97), and gene encoding MiaB-like tRNA modifying enzyme was transferred from Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans DSM 6589 residing terrestrial environments (SV: 1.0). The mechanisms by which gene transfer of Chlamydia occurring is still unclear. A number of phages required for transduction were discovered and DNA transfers were observed after host co-infection of multiple strains in many studies [9–11]. Chlamydiae phylum is considered as a group of successful parasites that have an extremely broad host range and distributed ubiquitous in nature. There have been only four families (Parachlamydiaceae, Simkaniaceae, Waddliaceae, and Criblamydiaceae) discovered within the phylum which can grow in natural hosts like amoebae [2]. However, it has been reported in many studies that a large number of rRNA sequence of chlamydia-like organisms are detected in various environmental samples such as soil, water, hot spring, and activated sludge samples [4, 32, 33]. Our results suggest that Chlamydia may have even more various host range than we have thought and potentially exchange genes in as yet unknown natural host. It also suggests the hypothesis that there may exist a novel gene transfer mechanism enabling Chlamydia to exchange genes with free-living organisms.
Variation in the effect of HGT between species
Analysis of 64 chlamydial genomes using the HGTree database identified that 701 gene families were inferred to have undergone one or more HGT, with 97 gene families transferred from outside of Chlamydiae. Further examination of the 701 HGT-acquired genes with RAxML and RANGER-DTL 2.0 resulted in 548 putative genes including 42 non-Chlamydia originated genes with high reliability. The percentage of received genes was markedly variable across the species, being more than threefold greater in C. felis lineage (30.1% of total genes), C. abortus lineage (27.4% of total genes), and C. caviae lineage (27.1% of total genes) than in C. trachomatis (8.15~9.66%) (Fig 2). The great amount of variability in the number of transferred genes between species is derived mainly from intra-phylum transfer events, on the other hands, the ratio of the inter-phylum transferred genes is shown consistently low across all strains. We also looked at the distribution of all detected gene families across COG functional categories [26]. We found that genes from all functional categories (Metabolism, Information storage and processing, and Cellular processes and signaling) are subject to transfer (Fig 3). In contrast, in inter-phylum transfers, genes related to metabolism, and information storage and processing are assigned relatively high (31% and 49%, respectively), while only 16% of cellular processes and signaling genes are assigned (Fig 3). These results indicate that there may exist genetic barriers of inter-phylum HGT in chlamydial genomes. Gene transfer between distantly related organisms is known to occur less frequently than between closely related organisms since genetic mechanisms and different genome organization can act as constraints for inter-phylum HGT [34, 35].
As mentioned above, the C. felis and C. abortus genome displayed the highest ratio of HGT genes in all the species, with 30.1% and 27.4% of total genes, respectively. C. abortus is the most recently diverged species which mainly responsible for enzootic abortion in sheep and cattle [36]. There is a strong correlation between adaptation and HGT. It is known that bacteria can respond to SOS triggered by environmental stress and promote horizontal distribution of essential genes for survival [37]. In a recent study, 190 recombination events were observed in 12 C. trachomatis recombinants under antibiotic pressure [38]. It is also reported that mismatch repair gene deficient bacteria have significantly increased the rate of HGT and subsequent recombination of those genes[39]. In this way, HGT can be used to speed up the rates of adaptation in new environments [40], on the other hand, it is kept at a minimal level [41]. Therefore, high ratio of HGT genes of C. abortus can be explained as the result of ongoing adaptation to a new pathogenic lifestyle in placenta. In contrast, all of the C. trachomatis lineages show relatively low ratios, with an average of 9.08% of genes transferred. Possible explanation for this phenomenon is that C. trachomatis has very long evolutionary history since its divergence from the other Chlamydia approximately 6 million years ago [42], and unlike other Chlamydia that infect across multiple host species with histories of frequent host species jumps [14, 43], C. trachomatis has human beings as its exclusive natural host. Nevertheless, they are successfully adapted intracellular pathogens, which infections are among the most common of all human bacterial infections as it is a leading cause of sexually transmitted infection and blindness worldwide [44, 45]. In this point of view, it may be hypothesized that their stability as well-adapted pathogens in static environments for a long period have made them to keep gene transfers at a minimal level. In addition, the absence of C. trachomatis infecting phages detected may have impacts on the low ratio of HGT [11].
KEGG analysis of transferred gene families was performed to investigate pathways that might play important roles in Chlamydia and test whether transferred gene sets of each lineage are varied across functional pathways. In our analysis, variation in the number of transferred gene sets between lineages was quite similar across pathways, in most lineages, carbohydrate, nucleotide, and cofactor metabolism exchanged most abundantly (Fig 4). In previous study, frequent exchange of genes in carbohydrate transport and metabolism among animal associated organisms was observed [46]. However, we found that the effect of intra-phylum transfer and inter-phylum transfer on each pathway were different (Fig 5). For instance, genes associated in aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis pathway were horizontally acquired mainly from non-chlamydial species, and interestingly, HGT of the genes related to type III secretion system (T3SS) almost exclusively occurred at intra-phylum level (Fig 5). The varying effect on the functional categories and species suggest some pathways may accept the introducing of new genes from different phylum better than other pathways. Not all genes are permissive to interspecific gene transfer. Genes which encode proteins making up large complexes or genes whose products interact with other particles a lot display less preference towards HGT [47]. In addition, deleterious interaction between native and acquired proteins may be also important barriers [47, 48]. Barriers between certain species have been recognized as well for many bacterial and archaeal species [49].
HGT of virulence-related genes of Chlamydia
Bacterial evolution is largely dependent on the ability to adapt and colonize specific niches. Gene transfers of virulence-related genes may affect the pathogenesis of specific Chlamydia strains. Therefore, it is important to identify these events to expand our understanding of speciation event and strain emergence. Although Chlamydia have very conserved genomes as a result of genome reduction imposed by their intracellular lifestyle [42], there is a region of hotspot for genome variation which is termed as “Plasticity zone,” and the region encodes virulence factors including membrane attack complex/perforin protein (MACPF), cytotoxin, and genes related to important biosynthesis and salvage pathways [50]. Presence or absence of these genes in the region are known to confer different niche-specificity to the organisms. Based on our work, there appeared to be several events of HGT in the plasticity zone occurring within Chlamydia genus. Since Chlamydia interact frequently with membranes during their infection, the role of MACPF is important [51]. We found the gene transfer of MACPF from C. abortus S26/3 to C. felis Fe/C-56 (SV: 1.0) and to C.psittaci M56 (SV: 1.0) separately. The tryptophan biosynthesis pathway is necessary for survival of Chlamydia since host restricts chlamydial growth by degrading tryptophan as a defense mechanism [52]. Each Chlamydia species possesses different level of functional gene sets of tryptophan biosynthesis pathway [53]. Among the genes associated in this pathway, only TyrP gene encoding tyrosine/tryptophan transport protein was transferred within Chlamydia genus (from C. felis Fe/C-56 to C. caviae GPIC; SV: 1.0). However, phylogenetic incongruence suggested that TrpC of C. pecorum E58, C. felis Fe/C-56, and C. caviae GPIC were might have been transferred from Coxiella burnetti dugway 5J108-111 strain, another obligate intracellular pathogen of humans and animals (SV: 1.0). TrpC encodes indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase which is necessary in the fourth step of tryptophan biosynthesis pathway. It was previously proposed that Coxiella burnetti acquired trp operon from simkania negevensis, a bacterium belonging to the Chlamydiae phylum [54]. Putative multiple intra-genus gene transfers were also observed in adenosine deaminase (Add) associated in purine ribonucleotide biosynthesis pathway (S1 Fig), although no signs of HGT were detected in GuaAB. Presence of tox/adhesion may affect Chlamydia pathogenesis and host-range. These loci present only in C. trachomatis, C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. psittaci, C. caviae, and C. felis species. To determine whether strains possessing the locus have gained the gene recently or whether these genes are lost by strains that do not is important [14]. According to our analysis, HGT of tox/adhesion had occurred from Escherichia coli and Citrobacter rodentinum to C. caviae GPIC (SV: 1.0).
Chlamydia displays a unique biphasic developmental cycle. At all stages of infection, interactions between the Chlamydia and its host are essential, and they translocate different types of virulence effector proteins into host cytoplasm which are used for manipulation of host cellular functions [55]. Like virulence genes in the plasticity zone, T3SS genes seemed to be mostly transferred within Chlamydia. Among the genes encoding structural components of the T3SS apparatus, there were evidences for intra-genus HGT in 5 genes (SctW, SctS, SctR, SctF, and SctP). Among the effector proteins that are used for manipulation of host cell immune response, EEA1, Cap1, CPAF, Tsp, and pGP6-D appear to have histories of HGT only with other Chlamydia.
HGT among Chlamydiaceae has been featured in many comparative genomics studies in recent few years [13, 14, 56]. We have discovered, using a tree reconciliation method, exchanges of virulence related genes are mainly occurred within Chlamydia genus. It suggests that intra-genus HGT may have been a major mechanism for the acquisition of determining factors of infection in Chlamydia. This discovery reflect that virulence related genes circulate among Chlamydia which may facilitate speciation event and new strain emergence. In microbial pathogens, virulence genes are particularly important determinants of host and tissue range [57], and transfer of those genes may provide a fitness benefit to the recipient. Gene acquisition from closely related species which have already adapted to meet the particular requirements of similar niche would confer even more advantages for adaptation. It will be informative to see if intra-genus HGT is a general mechanism for the acquisition of such factors also in other obligate intracellular pathogenesis. In this study, we uncovered several features of HGT acting on Chlamydia genome evolution and proposed an expansion of current understanding of Chlamydia ecology. More insights into HGT mechanism of Chlamydia will come from future laboratory experiments.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from the NextGeneration BioGreen 21 Program (PJ01115901), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Gupta RS, Naushad S, Chokshi C, Griffiths E, Adeolu M. A phylogenomic and molecular markers based analysis of the phylum Chlamydiae: proposal to divide the class Chlamydiia into two orders, Chlamydiales and Parachlamydiales ord. nov., and emended description of the class Chlamydiia. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;108(3):765–81. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0532-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Collingro A, Tischler P, Weinmaier T, Penz T, Heinz E, Brunham RC, et al. Unity in variety—the pan-genome of the Chlamydiae. Molecular biology and evolution. 2011;28(12):3253–70. Epub 2011/06/22. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr161 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3247790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Horn M. Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:113–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Corsaro D, Valassina M, Venditti D. Increasing diversity within Chlamydiae. Critical reviews in microbiology. 2003;29(1):37–78. doi: 10.1080/713610404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature. 2000;405(6784):299–304. doi: 10.1038/35012500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Aravind L. Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: quantification and classification 1. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 2001;55(1):709–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lind PA. Evolutionary Dynamics of Mutation and Gene Transfer in Bacteria: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Groisman EA, Ochman H. Pathogenicity islands: bacterial evolution in quantum leaps. Cell. 1996;87(5):791–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Srinivasan T, Bruno WJ, Wan R, Yen A, Duong J, Dean D. In vitro recombinants of antibiotic-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis strains have statistically more breakpoints than clinical recombinants for the same sequenced loci and exhibit selection at unexpected loci. Journal of bacteriology. 2012;194(3):617–26. doi: 10.1128/JB.06268-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.DeMars R, Weinfurter J. Interstrain gene transfer in Chlamydia trachomatis in vitro: mechanism and significance. Journal of bacteriology. 2008;190(5):1605–14. doi: 10.1128/JB.01592-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rosenwald AG, Murray B, Toth T, Madupu R, Kyrillos A, Arora G. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer between Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Chlamydia phage. Bacteriophage. 2014;4(4):e965076 doi: 10.4161/21597073.2014.965076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, et al. Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science (New York, NY). 1998;282(5389):754–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Harris SR, Clarke IN, Seth-Smith HM, Solomon AW, Cutcliffe LT, Marsh P, et al. Whole-genome analysis of diverse Chlamydia trachomatis strains identifies phylogenetic relationships masked by current clinical typing. Nature genetics. 2012;44(4):413–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.2214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Read TD, Joseph SJ, Didelot X, Liang B, Patel L, Dean D. Comparative analysis of Chlamydia psittaci genomes reveals the recent emergence of a pathogenic lineage with a broad host range. MBio. 2013;4(2):e00604–12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00604-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer. Nature genetics. 2005;37(12):1372–5. doi: 10.1038/ng1686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Polz MF, Alm EJ, Hanage WP. Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of bacterial and archaeal population structure. Trends in Genetics. 2013;29(3):170–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jeong H, Sung S, Kwon T, Seo M, Caetano-Anollés K, Choi SH, et al. HGTree: database of horizontally transferred genes determined by tree reconciliation. Nucleic acids research. 2015:gkv1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kordi M, Bansal MS. Exact algorithms for duplication-transfer-loss reconciliation with non-binary gene trees. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sennblad B, Lagergren J. Probabilistic orthology analysis. Systematic biology. 2009;58(4):411–24. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic acids research. 2011:gkr367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland E, Stærfeldt H, Rognes T, Ussery D. RNammer: consistent annotation of rRNA genes in genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim KM, Sung S, Caetano-Anollés G, Han JY, Kim H. An approach of orthology detection from homologous sequences under minimum evolution. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36(17):e110–e. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Molecular systems biology. 2011;7(1):539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Junier T, Zdobnov EM. The Newick utilities: high-throughput phylogenetic tree processing in the UNIX shell. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(13):1669–70. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC bioinformatics. 2003;4(1):41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bose T, Haque MM, Reddy C, Mande SS. COGNIZER: a framework for functional annotation of metagenomic datasets. PloS one. 2015;10(11):e0142102 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W242–5. Epub 2016/04/21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4987883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Borel N, Leonard C, Slade J, Schoborg RV. Chlamydial antibiotic resistance and treatment failure in veterinary and human medicine. Current clinical microbiology reports. 2016;3(1):10–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yeruva L, Spencer N, Bowlin AK, Wang Y, Rank RG. Chlamydial infection of the gastrointestinal tract: a reservoir for persistent infection. Pathogens and disease. 2013;68(3):88–95. Epub 2013/07/12. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12052 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3751173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stecher B, Maier L, Hardt W-D. 'Blooming'in the gut: how dysbiosis might contribute to pathogen evolution. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2013;11(4):277–84. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corsaro D, Venditti D, Valassina M. New chlamydial lineages from freshwater samples. Microbiology (Reading, England). 2002;148(Pt 2):343–4. Epub 2002/02/08. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-343 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Horn M, Wagner M. Evidence for additional genus-level diversity of Chlamydiales in the environment. FEMS microbiology letters. 2001;204(1):71–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soucy SM, Huang J, Gogarten JP. Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2015;16(8):472–82. doi: 10.1038/nrg3962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lawrence JG, Hendrickson H. Genome evolution in bacteria: order beneath chaos. Current opinion in microbiology. 2005;8(5):572–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Longbottom D, Coulter L. Animal chlamydioses and zoonotic implications. Journal of comparative pathology. 2003;128(4):217–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Beaber JW, Hochhut B, Waldor MK. SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Nature. 2004;427(6969):72–4. doi: 10.1038/nature02241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jeffrey BM, Suchland RJ, Eriksen SG, Sandoz KM, Rockey DD. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of in vitro-generated Chlamydia trachomatis recombinants. BMC microbiology. 2013;13(1):142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Denamur E, Lecointre G, Darlu P, Tenaillon O, Acquaviva C, Sayada C, et al. Evolutionary implications of the frequent horizontal transfer of mismatch repair genes. Cell. 2000;103(5):711–21. Epub 2000/12/15. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cohen E, Kessler DA, Levine H. Recombination dramatically speeds up evolution of finite populations. Physical review letters. 2005;94(9):098102 Epub 2005/03/24. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.098102 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raz Y, Tannenbaum E. The influence of horizontal gene transfer on the mean fitness of unicellular populations in static environments. Genetics. 2010;185(1):327–37. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.113613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nunes A, Gomes JP. Evolution, phylogeny, and molecular epidemiology of Chlamydia. Infection, genetics and evolution: journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases. 2014;23:49–64. Epub 2014/02/11. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.01.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Roulis E, Polkinghorne A, Timms P. Chlamydia pneumoniae: modern insights into an ancient pathogen. Trends in microbiology. 2013;21(3):120–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mariotti SP, Pascolini D, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Trachoma: global magnitude of a preventable cause of blindness. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(5):563–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.148494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Principles and practice of infectious diseases: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Caro-Quintero A, Konstantinidis KT. Inter-phylum HGT has shaped the metabolism of many mesophilic and anaerobic bacteria. The ISME journal. 2015;9(4):958–67. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cohen O, Gophna U, Pupko T. The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather than function constitutes a barrier to horizontal gene transfer. Molecular biology and evolution. 2011;28(4):1481–9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jain R, Rivera MC, Lake JA. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(7):3801–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Suchland R, Sandoz KM, Jeffrey B, Stamm W, Rockey D. Horizontal transfer of tetracycline resistance among Chlamydia spp. in vitro. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2009;53(11):4604–11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00477-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jelocnik M, Bachmann NL, Kaltenboeck B, Waugh C, Woolford L, Speight KN, et al. Genetic diversity in the plasticity zone and the presence of the chlamydial plasmid differentiates Chlamydia pecorum strains from pigs, sheep, cattle, and koalas. BMC genomics. 2015;16(1):893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Taylor LD, Nelson DE, Dorward DW, Whitmire WM, Caldwell HD. Biological characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis plasticity zone MACPF domain family protein CT153. Infection and immunity. 2010;78(6):2691–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01455-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Beatty WL, Belanger TA, Desai AA, Morrison RP, Byrne GI. Tryptophan depletion as a mechanism of gamma interferon-mediated chlamydial persistence. Infection and immunity. 1994;62(9):3705–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fehlner-Gardiner C, Roshick C, Carlson JH, Hughes S, Belland RJ, Caldwell HD, et al. Molecular basis defining human Chlamydia trachomatis tissue tropism A possible role for tryptophan synthase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(30):26893–903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203937200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cenci U, Ducatez M, Kadouche D, Colleoni C, Ball SG. Was the Chlamydial adaptative strategy to tryptophan starvation an early determinant of plastid endosymbiosis? Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2016;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Betts-Hampikian HJ, Fields KA. The chlamydial type III secretion mechanism: revealing cracks in a tough nut. The obligate intracellular lifestyle. 2010:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Joseph SJ, Didelot X, Rothschild J, de Vries HJ, Morré SA, Read TD, et al. Population genomics of Chlamydia trachomatis: insights on drift, selection, recombination, and population structure. Molecular biology and evolution. 2012:mss198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ribet D, Cossart P. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microbes and Infection. 2015;17(3):173–83. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2015.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.