Abstract
Measurement of Visual Acuity (VA) has been used for eye examinations under various clinical conditions. In addition, because of changes in VA with a range of eye diseases, its measurement is used to screen, diagnose, and evaluate response to treatment in numerous eye diseases and predict the patient's visual function. VA and the likelihood of astigmatism could be evaluated simultaneously using a newly designed Stripped Circle (SC) VA chart. This chart has been developed based on the standard VA measurement scale chart, and the Landolt-C (LC) VA chart and all the standards for a VA chart design were implemented during its development. However, to publicize the clinical application of this VA measurement chart, further studies are required to evaluate its sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability compared with a similar standard VA chart.
Key Words: Visual Acuity, dolt-C visual acuity chart, Stripped Circle visual acuity chart
INTRODUCTION
Visual Acuity (VA) measurement is the most common method for assessing visual function in clinical practice and research [1]. Measuring VA is an important part of routine eye examinations as it plays an important role in determining the prognosis of eye disorders, as well as assessing response to treatment. Furthermore, based on valid published studies, high prevalence of astigmatism has been found in several racial groups of school-aged children in the United States. This can highlight the importance of simultaneous assessment of VA and astigmatism among children [2-7]. The Landolt-C (LC) VA chart is commonly used for the assessment of childhood VA in the screening process, while also making possible the assessment of VA of illiterate maple and non-English speakers [8].
Although this test has been used for more than a century and is widely accepted as the gold standard, it also has its own inherent problems, probably due to the higher brain function where the gap of its optotype appears closed due to close proximity to the limit of resolution, particularly when the gap of optotype is at 6 o'clock. This limitation of LC VA chart is not due to the structure of the cornea or lens or an existing astigmatism [9, 10].
The adjusted Stripped Circle (SC) VA chart presented in the current report is based on the LC chart, and allows simultaneous assessment of VA and the likelihood of astigmatism. However, we propose to compare this novel assessment tool with a standard VA chart, such as an LC VA chart, to determine its sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability.
HYPOTHESIS
The chart was designed based on well-established standards for designing a VA measurement chart. Furthermore, a chart was then designed for the optotype with the same dimensions and standards as the LC VA chart. According to this method, 2 VA charts were constructed in a similar manner with different optotypes for subsequent evaluation.
In most LC charts, the gap of the optotype is located in 4 directions, on the top, bottom, right, or left [11]. The chart of the current report contained stripy circles with 4 orientations, including horizontal, vertical, left (the angle of stripes being 135 degree) or right (the angle of stripes being 45 degree). The chart was designed in high contrast black on white optotypes, as shown in Figure 1. It consists of 13 rows, with 2 rows spaced equal to the height of 1 lower row of optotypes, and the number of optotypes in each row from top to bottom is proportional to the increase in VA. In this chart, logarithmic increments for the size of the optotypes were considered, and for different levels of VA, optotypes equivalent to that of a standard VA chart are used. Also, the spacing of each optotype to the next optotype in a row was considered equivalent to an equivalent optotype. The VA measurements are commonly made with the VA chart at moderate photopic luminance, while the room lighting is typically subdued. The standardized chart luminance range in this protocol was from 85 to 400 lux.
Figure 1.
The Striped Circle (SC) Chart
DISCUSSION
For a test to gain recognition as a routine clinical screening tool, several criteria must be met. One of the most important is the reliability of the test. Therefore, evaluating similarities between the newly designed test and a standard test is necessary [12]
This report focused solely on the idea and design of a new VA chart, thus further studies are required to evaluate this novel VA examination toll. The authors propose to design a computer model of this chart with an identical optotype on the Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) monitor to facilitate the assessment of VA of individuals. Design of a handheld model is also suggested with the same optotype to examine near VA in the working distance. The present invention, as described earlier, aimed at designing an upgraded chart for VA assessment that evaluates the ability of the visual system to identify the new optotype. However, the described invention may be required to undergo further evaluations.
The basic optotype consists of striped circles in 4 main directions of astigmatism (horizontal, vertical, left at 135 degree, and right at 45 degree). The objects are arranged in 13 rows.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been registered as an innovation by Department for Registration of Corporation and Industrial Property, Iran, Patent No: 90261, 25 October 2016. Part of this study has been presented in European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ESCRS) winter meeting, Feb 2018, Belgrade.
DISCLOSURE
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.
References
- 1.Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA. How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(8):3278–81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1100. PubMed PMID: 12882770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Levy WJ, Wall FJ. A study of the refractive state of a group of American Pueblo Indians. Rocky Mt Med J. 1969;66(9):40–2. PubMed PMID: 5349207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boniuk V. Refractive problems in native peoples (the Sioux Lookout Project) Can J Ophthalmol. 1973;8(2):229–33. PubMed PMID: 4707205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hamilton JE. Vision anomalies of Indian school children: the Lame Deer study. J Am Optom Assoc. 1976;47(4):479–87. PubMed PMID: 1027851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wick B, Crane S. A vision profile of American Indian children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53(1):34–40. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197601000-00006. PubMed PMID: 937471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mohindra I, Nagaraj S. Astigmatism in Zuni and Navajo indians. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;54(2):121–4. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197702000-00011. PubMed PMID: 869007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harvey EM, Dobson V, Miller JM. Prevalence of high astigmatism, eyeglass wear, and poor visual acuity among Native American grade school children. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(4):206–12. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000214333.84822.71. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000214333.84822.71. PubMed PMID: 16614575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taylor HR. Applying new design principles to the construction of an illiterate E chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(5):348–51. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197805000-00008. PubMed PMID: 696798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reich LN, Ekabutr M. The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(6):389–93. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200206000-00013. PubMed PMID: 12086306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schrauf M, Stern C. The visual resolution of Landolt-C optotypes in human subjects depends on their orientation: the 'gap-down' effect. Neurosci Lett. 2001;299(3):185–8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01505-1. PubMed PMID: 11165766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Becker RH, Hubsch SH, Graf MH, Kaufmann H. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols. Strabismus. 2000;8(3):209–13. PubMed PMID: 11035563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simpson TL, Regan D. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(1):11–6. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199501000-00003. PubMed PMID: 7731649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]