Abstract
Massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition is a rare placental pathology associated with significant adverse pregnancy outcome and can recur. We provide a detailed case review of a woman through 10 of her pregnancies, including 8 consecutive pregnancy losses and 2 live births. We also conducted a retrospective chart review of all massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition placenta specimens at our institution over an eight-year period. A total of 42 cases of massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition were identified from 2007 to 2015, yielding an incidence of 0.16%. Recurrence was seen in subsequent pregnancy in eight out of nine (88.9%) cases with more than one specimen. The clinical characteristics, perinatal outcomes and α-feto protein level of the 42 cases are presented. Also, presented is a review of the literature discussing placental pathology, pathogenetic mechanisms and management of this condition.
Keywords: Placenta, massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition, maternal floor infarction, pregnancy loss
Introduction
Placental pathology offers insight into intrauterine experience, including both acute and chronic events. Histopathologic examination of the placenta has been increasingly recognized and accepted as an important clinical tool that can provide clues about in utero insults and help guide the management of both newborn and subsequent pregnancies.1 Placental pathology is also gaining interest as a predictor of future maternal and neonatal health, i.e. the development of chronic disease later in life. Despite these well-known advantages of placental pathologic examination, this mode of investigation remains underutilized in perinatal medicine.
Certain pathologies that can recur in subsequent pregnancies, deserve particular attention as they may affect pregnancy management. Massive perivillous fibrin/fibrinoid deposition (MPFD) is a rare placental pathology, characterized by excessive perivillous deposition of fibrinoid material, with unclear aetiopathogenesis. It is associated with high perinatal morbidity, mortality, and can recur in subsequent pregnancies.2
Our study aims to share a multidisciplinary experience at a single institute and provide updates on clinical association and management of MPFD. We present the detailed history of a case of this rare placental condition, followed by a retrospective review of cases of MPFD at our institution over the past eight years.
Methods
This was a single-institute retrospective study based on chart review. Our hospital is a tertiary care center for pregnant women and more than 80% of the deliveries in the state take place in our hospital. Placental pathology reports are completed by board-certified pathologists in Pediatric Pathology in the Perinatal Division following standard protocol.3 Weekly audit is performed for 10% of the cases.
With approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 14-0067), placenta reports with diagnosis of “massive perivillous fibrin/fibrinoid deposition (MPFD)” were searched in Hospital Information System from 2007 to January 2015. The diagnosis of “Massive perivillous fibrin/fibrinoid deposition” was made when “perivillous fibrinoid material extending from the maternal surface to fetal surface, encasing ≥ 50% of the villi on at least one slide.”3 From the identified specimens, selected placental gross and microscopic findings, gestational age (GA) at delivery, maternal laboratory testing results, prenatal testing results, birth weight, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, and adverse pregnancy outcomes including intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) were collected as data. The placental weight percentile by gestational age was also collected, with small-for-gestational age defined as weighing less than the 10th percentile.
Results
We describe below a clinical case study of a patient with MPFD and follow with the summary of a series of cases along with a review of the literature of this interesting placental pathology.
Case 1
A 27-year-old gravida 4 para 0 at 16 weeks’ gestation presented to the obstetric medicine clinic for ongoing management of anticoagulation in her pregnancy. She had been seen at the Reproductive Endocrinology clinic at our facility after three consecutive first trimester losses. A comprehensive work-up for various causes of recurrent miscarriage, including anatomical causes was negative. During the course of these investigations, she was noted to be homozygous for the MTHFR gene mutation and also reported a family history of venous thromboembolism. Her maternal grandmother had several deep vein thromboses (DVT) and multiple miscarriages. Several other family members were reported as having three or more miscarriages.
After establishment of her care at our institution, the patient had another five pregnancy losses. Karyotyping results for products of conception (POCs) #6–8 were normal. Following the 3rd loss, she started low dose aspirin (81 mg daily). A folic acid supplement was started after the 4th loss. Low-molecular weight Heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, was started during the 7th pregnancy and given in all subsequent pregnancies.
In the 9th pregnancy, at 27 weeks’ gestation, the fetus was found to have severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The umbilical arterial Doppler showed persistent elevation of the systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio, intermittent absent end diastolic flow (AEDF), and waveforms suggesting increased placental resistance and placental dysfunction. A cesarean section was performed at 31 weeks secondary to intermittent variable fetal heart rate decelerations and breech presentation. The birth weight was between 3 and 10th percentile, the placental weight was between 75 and 90th percentile, and the feto-to-placental (F/P) weight ratio was 2.75 (<3rd percentile).
Pathological examination of the placenta of the 9th pregnancy was consistent with MPFD. This included full-thickness “orange rind” appearance in cross sections (Figure 1(a)). Microscopically, in 10% of the parenchyma, hypermature but relatively normal chorionic villi (accelerated maturation) were seen. The remaining 90% of the parenchyma showed villi encased in diffuse fibrinoid material, with a prominent proliferation of extravillous trophoblast (EVT). There were multiple foci of chronic villitis (Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1.
Gross and microscopic pathology of the uterine evacuation specimen and placentas from the case. (a) Placenta of the 9th pregnancy, representative cross section. (b) Placenta of the 9th pregnancy, H&E, 40×, showing diffuse perivillous fibrinoid deposition with extravillous trophoblastic (EVT) proliferation. (c) Evacuation specimen of the 7th loss, H&E, 40×, showing extensive perivillous fibrinoid deposition. (d) POC of the 8th loss, H&E, 200×, showing extensive perivillous fibrinoid deposition. (e) Placenta of the 10th pregnancy, representative cross section. (f) Placenta of the 10th pregnancy, H&E, 100×. On the left, chorionic villi with morphology consistent with the gestational age of 35 weeks; on the right, placental septa showing proliferation of EVT.
Placental specimens from this patient’s prior losses were retrieved from the Pathology archives and reexamined. Pathological examination of POCs #6–8 revealed viable immature chorionic villi embedded in perivillous fibrinoid material (Figure 1(c) and (d)). It is important to note that MPFD may not be correctly identified in POC where only a fragment rather than the whole placenta is submitted.
The patient presented six months after a prior delivery with her 10th pregnancy. In addition to routine prenatal care, during this pregnancy, she received enoxaparin in prophylactic doses, aspirin, and folic acid. Her antenatal course was mostly uneventful. She presented at 35 weeks’ gestation for non-reassuring non-stress test (NST) and was delivered by repeat cesarean section. Birth weight for the newborn was between 10th and 25th percentile, placental weight was less than 10th percentile, and the F/P ratio was 7.53 (75th–90th percentile). The placenta of the 10th pregnancy was SGA and had a red-maroon parenchyma without obvious discrete lesions (Figure 1(e)). More than 95% of the parenchyma contained hypermature chorionic villi with no obvious perivillous fibrinoid deposition. There were prominent septa showing fibrinoid deposition, EVT proliferation and microcyst formation (Figure 1(f)). Focal chronic villitis was once again noted. The clinical history, pathological are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics and pathological features of the pregnancy history of Case 1.
| No. of pregnancy | Testing performed | Treatment | Outcome | Major pathological (placental) findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | Unknown | – | Losses | – |
| 4 | Presented to our hospital Hysterosalpingography - Normal. Lupus anticoagulant – Negative Anticardiolipin antibodies – Negative. | Low dose Aspirin started | Loss | – |
| 5 | Thrombophilia workup: Homozygosity for MTHFR gene mutation C677T; normal homocysteine level. | Folic acid supplementation started | Loss before 10 wks GA | – |
| 6 | Karyotyping of POC - Normal | Loss before 10 wks GA | MPFD with EVT proliferation | |
| 7 | Clomid ovulation induction Karyotyping of POC – Normal | LMWH | Loss at 7 wks GA | MPFD with EVT proliferation |
| 8 | Clomid ovulation induction Karyotyping of POC – Normal | LMWH | Loss at 7 wks GA | MPFD with EVT proliferation |
| 9 | Maternal AFP – Increased (9.62MoM) IUGR detected at 27 wks by US | Low molecular weight Heparin As soon as pregnant and Throughout pregnancy Steroids at 29 wks GA | Intermittent AEDF at 29 wks GA Premature rupture of Membrane; primary Cesarean section at 31′5 wks GA SGA boy Apgar 7(1′), 8(5′) 4 weeks benign NICU Course, transient thrombocytopenia | - Appropriate for gestational age, preterm singleton placenta - Massive perivillous fibrin/fibrinoid deposition with extravillous Trophoblastic proliferation - Chronic villitis, multifocal - Accelerated villous maturity - Hypercoiled umbilical cord F/P < 3rd centile |
| 10 | Maternal AFP – Increased (2.46 MoM) | Aspirin Folic acid LMW Heparin | IUGR Repeat c-section at 36 wks GA AGA boy Apgar 7(1′), 8(5′) | - SGA preterm placenta - Prominent septa with fibrinoid deposition and increased EVT - Chronic villitis, multifocal - Hypercoiled umbilical cord F/P between 75th to 90th centile |
AEDF: absent end diastolic flow; AFP: alpha fetoprotein; AGA: appropriate for gestational age; EVT: extravillous trophopblast ; F/P: feto-placental weight ratio; GA: Gestational age; LMWH: low-molecular weight heparin; MoM: multiple of medium; MPFD: massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition; MTHFR: methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase; NICU: neonatal intensive care; POC: products of conception; SGA: small for gestational age.
Case series
Data from our own institution revealed 42 cases of MPFD/MFI identified during a period of eight years between 2007 and 2015 (Table 2), averaging five cases per year. Placentae are submitted for pathologic exam at our institution based on criteria as recommended in the College of American Pathologists’ guidelines.4 The average number of placentae submitted annually for pathological examination is 3000, representing approximately 1/3 of annual deliveries. The incidence of MPFD in placenta examined at our institution was noted to be 0.16%, which is within the range reported in the medical literature.
Table 2.
Clinicopathologic features among MPFD/MFI placentas (n = 42) with clinical outcomes of IUFD, neonatal death, IUGR or neither.
| Clinical parameter | Pts with IUFD or Neonatal death (n = 9) | Pts with IUGR (n = 19) | Pts with neither IUFD nor IUGR (n = 18) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Second trimester loss | 7 (77%)* | 5 (26%)* | 0 |
| Preterm delivery | 9 (100%)* | 14 (74%)* | 6 (33%) |
| Small for gestational age placenta | 4 (44%) | 6 (31%) | 3 (17%) |
| Birth weight less than 10th%tile | 7 (77%)* | 13 (68%)* | 2 (11%) |
| Increased alpha fetoprotein | 0 | 6 (31%)* | 0 |
| Obstetric complications | 2 (22%) | 12 (63%) | 6 (33%) |
| Chronic hypertension | 0 | 2 (10%) | 1 (5%) |
Note: Compared to the group with neither IUFD nor IUGR, *P < 0.05.
Obstetric complications: Acute fatty liver of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension.
IGUR: intrauterine growth restriction; IUFD: intrauterine fetal demise; MPFD: massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition
Among these 42 cases, nine patients had more than one placenta or POC specimen submitted to Pathology. Review of the reports demonstrated increased perivillous fibrin/fibrinoid deposition in more than one placenta/POC for eight of these patients (8/9, 88.9%), confirming the recurrent nature of this pathology.
Table 2 summarizes clinicopathological correlations within the cases from our institute. Among the 42 cases, gestational age at delivery ranged from 17 to 41 weeks. There were 9 cases of IUFD or neonatal death (21.4%), 19 cases of IUGR (45.2%), and 25 cases of preterm birth (60%) including 12 pregnancies ending during the 2nd trimester (28.6%).
Eleven (11/42, 26.2%) cases had SGA placentas and seven (16.7%) had LGA ones. Eighteen (18/42, 42.9%) cases were associated with birth weight < 10th percentile but only one with birth weight >90th percentile. For 38 cases with available F/P weight ratios, 18 (47.3%) had F/P ratios < 10th percentile, suggestive of placental insufficiency. This result suggests that placental insufficiency is a common theme in placentas with MPFD.
When comparing the cases associated with IUFD or neonatal death (n = 9) to the ones without IUFD or IUGR (n = 18), those with IUFD were associated with preterm delivery (9/9 vs. 6/18, P < 0.001), usually ending in the 2nd trimester (7/9 vs. 0/18, P < 0.0001). Most of the IUFD cases (7/9, 77.8%) were also associated with SGA fetuses. Increased AFP was noted in a significant number of cases associated with IUGR (6/19 vs. 0/18, P = 0.012).
In summary, pregnancies complicated by MPFD in our institution were associated with significant adverse outcomes, likely secondary to placental insufficiency.
Discussion
Definition, incidence and pathology
MPFD and “maternal floor infarction” (MFI) are related idiopathic placenta disorders. MFI is more frequently used clinically, while MPFD is preferred by pathologists. MFI was originally described by Benirschke and Driscoll in 1967, while MPFD was first reported by Fox in 1976. The terms are often used interchangeably in the literature. While MFI has been used frequently, it is a misnomer since the nature of pathology is not infarct, rather intervillous fibrinoid deposition. The incidence of MPFD/MFI is reported to be from 0.028% to 0.5% with a reported recurrence rate of 30% or more.2
MPFD/MFI has characteristic gross and microscopic morphologies, as reflected in our case. Placental cross sections may either present a diffuse yellow, firm (“orange rind” appearance) parenchyma or a lesion more concentrated around the basal plate (maternal floor) with histologic features of massive fibrin/fibrinoid deposition with extravillous trophoblast (EVT) proliferation and chorionic villi encased in a netlike pattern. The engulfed villi are abnormal, showing villous fibrosis and karyorrhexis. Intervening villi are relatively normal. Chronic nonspecific villitis, as noted in this case, can be seen occasionally. The fibrinoid material in the intervillous space obstructs maternal blood flow and interferes with oxygen and nutrient supply through the maternal-fetal interface, resulting in reduced placental efficiency, as exemplified by the placenta from the 9th pregnancy, which had an F/P ratio of < 3rd percentile. The F/P ratio is often used as a marker of placental efficiency. An F/P ratio of < 10th percentile is suggestive of placental insufficiency. Fibrinoid deposition in the placenta may be detected by prenatal ultrasound as increased echogenicity, but the finding is not specific for this lesion.5,6 Prenatal ultrasound may also reveal evidence of increased placental resistance and dysfunction as in our patient.7
The histological differential diagnosis of MPFD usually includes intervillous thrombi (IVT), parenchymal infarct, and chronic non-specific villitis (villitis of unknown etiology (VUE)). Intervillous thrombi are usually focal or multifocal, but MPFD/MFI is diffuse in nature. In IVT, the material in the intervillous space is fibrin which has a layered appearance. In placental infarct, there is a collapse of intervillous space and a loss of distinct nuclear basophilia at later stages. Intervillous thrombi are considered suggestive of feto-placental hemorrhage, while parenchymal infarct is regarded as a feature related to uteroplacental malperfusion often seen in gestational hypertensive disorders.
Etiology and pathogenesis
The etiologies and pathogenic mechanisms of MPFD/MFI are not clear yet. Since the characteristic fibrinoid material consists of fibrin and other proteins such as products from the coagulation cascade,2 most proposed mechanisms and explanations of etiology have therefore focused on maternal thrombophilia or autoimmune illnesses such as lupus anticoagulant.8 Possible involvement of a defect in the trophoblastic protein C system has also been suggested in the pathogenesis of MPFD.9 Our patient underwent a thrombophilia screen as was indicated by her recurrent miscarriages and a family history of thrombosis. Lupus anticoagulant testing was negative. She tested positive for a homozygous MTHFR mutation but with normal homocysteine levels. While there is an association between inherited thrombophilias and venous thromboembolism during pregnancy, there is no established link between inherited thrombophilias and uteroplacental thrombosis. In particular, MTHFR mutations are not considered to confer an increased thrombotic risk in pregnant women.10
Autoimmune processes are considered possible etiologies for MPFD/MFI. Recently, Romero et al.11 proposed that maternal anti-fetal rejection occurs in a subset of MPFD/MFI cases by demonstrating that MPFD placentas had a significantly higher frequency of plasma cell deciduitis and C4d deposition in the umbilical vein. MPFD cases exhibited substantially higher maternal anti-HLA class I sero-positivity, maternal antibodies against fetal HLA I and II antigens, and mean maternal plasma concentrations of CXCL-10.
Another proposed mechanism is the imbalance of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors, such as higher plasma concentrations of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (sVEGFR) and lower concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF).12 One study on perinatal autopsies associated with MPFD revealed the co-occurrence of recurrent renal tubular dysgenesis (RTD) in three consecutive pregnancies in one woman with MPFD, and a causal relationship was proposed.13 This study shed light on the feto-placental unit as a whole in the pathogenesis of MPFD. MPFD has also been reported in association with Coxsackie virus infection and hypercoiling of a single-artery cord.14,15
Clinico-pathological correlation of MPFD/MFI
MPFD/MFI is known to be associated with intrauterine fetal death (13–50%), IUGR (24–100%) and preterm delivery (26–60%).5 IUGR is noted early in the third trimester. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome was also found to be a complication.6
Neurodevelopmental outcome was not investigated in current study.
Is MPFD treatable?
Despite the lack of a clear understanding of the etiology of MPFD, different treatment strategies have been attempted.16 There are reports of successful management of recurrent fetal loss due to MPFD/MFI using LMWH and immunoglobulin to address the potential thromboembolic and autoimmune etiologies, respectively.17,18 LMWH is often combined with low-dose aspirin. Makino et al.17 reported a case of MPFD/MFI in which the use of oral low-dose aspirin and LMWH during subsequent pregnancy was associated with a reduction in the degree of perivillous fibrinoid deposition, similar to what was seen in our case.17 In other studies, the benefit of LMWH has been noted to be independent of the presence of inherited thrombophilias or the concurrent administration of low dose aspirin. The beneficial functions of LMWH may include anti-inflammatory activity, trophoblast differentiation and invasion, angiogenesis, or reduction of vascular resistance.19
Based on the previous report on the imbalance of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors,12 another study reported the use of pravastatin to treat a patient with recurrent pregnancy losses, resulting in a live birth at 34 weeks.20
Conclusion
In conclusion, our case is an example of recurrent pregnancy loss in eight consecutive pregnancies, with the same pathology identified in all four available consecutive specimens, and a disappearance of this pathology in the last successful pregnancy after clinical intervention.
Albeit rare, MPFD is a recurring pathology with significant adverse outcomes in pregnancy including recurrent loss, IUGR, and IUFD. In patient with such clinical scenarios, placental exam should definitely be performed and the identification of MPFD/MFI and other recurring pathologies should alert the pregnancy management team to the risk of recurrent complications in subsequent pregnancies. Closer monitoring should be provided, and other treatment options considered. The disappearance of the recurrent pathology in this patient’s 10th pregnancy with the use of LMWH is encouraging. However, more studies are necessary to investigate the benefits of LMWH in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to MPFD/MFI and related pathologies.
The adverse neurodevelopmental outcome associated with MPFD/MFI5 suggests that, for children born with severe placental pathology, long-term follow-up should be provided, even if there are no significant problems during the perinatal and neonatal period.
Acknowledgement
This case report was included briefly in the following. Al-Khan JN, Bulmer FC, et al. IFPA Meeting 2012 workshop report III: trophoblast deportation, gestational trophoblastic disease, placental insufficiency and fetal growth restriction, trophoblast over-invasion and accreta-related pathologies, placental thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Placenta (34 Supplement): S11–S16.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 14-0067) at Women and Infants hospital as a retrospective chart review with waiver of patient consent.
Guarantor
MH.
Contributorship
Mai He is also the guaranteeing author and confirms the manuscript’s accuracy and the contributorship of all co-authors.
References
- 1.Roberts DJ, Oliva E. Clinical significance of placental examination in perinatal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 255–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Katzman PJ, Genest DR. Maternal floor infarction and massive perivillous fibrin deposition: histological definitions, association with intrauterine fetal growth restriction, and risk of recurrence. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5: 159–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pinar H, Koch MA, Hawkins H, et al. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) placental and umbilical cord examination protocol. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 781–792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Langston C, Kaplan C, Macpherson T, et al. Practice guideline for examination of the placenta: developed by the Placental Pathology Practice Guideline Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 449–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Andres RL, Kuyper W, Resnik R, et al. The association of maternal floor infarction of the placenta with adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 935–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Adams-Chapman I, Vaucher YE, Bejar RF, et al. Maternal floor infarction of the placenta: association with central nervous system injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. J Perinatol 2002; 22: 236–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mandsager NT, Bendon R, Mostello D, et al. Maternal floor infarction of the placenta: prenatal diagnosis and clinical significance. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83(5 Pt 1): 750–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sebire NJ, Backos M, Goldin RD, et al. Placental massive perivillous fibrin deposition associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. BJOG 2002; 109: 570–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Svensson AM, Waters BL, Laszik ZG, et al. The protein C system in placental massive perivillous fibrin deposition. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2004; 15: 491–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 138: inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Women's Health Care Physicians. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 706–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Romero R, Whitten A, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Maternal floor infarction/massive perivillous fibrin deposition: a manifestation of maternal antifetal rejection? Am J Reprod Immunol 2013; 70: 285–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Whitten AE, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Evidence of an imbalance of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in massive perivillous fibrindeposition (maternal floor infarction): a placental lesion associated with recurrent miscarriage and fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 310.e1–310.e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Linn RL, Kiley J, Minturn L, et al. Recurrent massive perivillous fibrin deposition in the placenta associated with fetal renal tubulardysgenesis: case report and literature review. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2013; 16: 378–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heller D, Tellier R, Pabbaraju K, et al. Placental massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition associated with coxsackievirus A16-report of a case, and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2016; 19: 421–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taweevisit M, Thorner PS. Maternal floor infarction/massive perivillous fibrin deposition associated with hypercoiling of a single-artery umbilical cord: a case report. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2016; 19: 69–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Al-Sahan N, Grynspan D, von Dadelszen P, et al. Maternal floor infarction: management of an underrecognized pathology. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 293–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Makino A, Suzuki Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Use of aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrence of maternal floor infarction in women without evidence of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19: 261–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chang P, Millar D, Tsang P, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin in antiphospholipid syndrome and maternal floor infarction when standard treatment fails: a case report. Am J Perinatol 2006; 23: 125–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rodger MA, Carrier M, Le Gal G, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin for placenta-mediated pregnancy complications study group. Meta-analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. Blood 2014; 123: 822–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Pravastatin to prevent recurrent fetal death in massive perivillous fibrin deposition of the placenta (MPFD). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29: 855–862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

