Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Brain logoLink to Brain
. 2017 Dec 14;141(2):521–534. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx328

Retiring the term FTDP-17 as MAPT mutations are genetic forms of sporadic frontotemporal tauopathies

Shelley L Forrest 1, Jillian J Kril 1, Claire H Stevens 2, John B Kwok 3,4,5, Marianne Hallupp 3, Woojin S Kim 3,4,5, Yue Huang 5, Ciara V McGinley 1, Hellen Werka 1, Matthew C Kiernan 3, Jürgen Götz 6, Maria Grazia Spillantini 7, John R Hodges 3,4,5, Lars M Ittner 2,4, Glenda M Halliday 3,4,5,✉
PMCID: PMC5888940  PMID: 29253099

See Josephs (doi:10.1093/brain/awx367) for a scientific commentary on this article.

Mutations in the MAPT gene on chromosome 17 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Mutation-associated cases are currently classified separately from sporadic cases with tau inclusions, as FTDP-17, but Forrest et al. provide evidence that these cases should in fact be considered familial forms of FTLD-tau subtypes.

Keywords: corticobasal degeneration, globular glial tauopathy, MAPT, Pick’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy

Abstract

See Josephs (doi:10.1093/brain/awx367) for a scientific commentary on this article.

In many neurodegenerative disorders, familial forms have provided important insights into the pathogenesis of their corresponding sporadic forms. The first mutations associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) were found in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene on chromosome 17 in families with frontotemporal degeneration and parkinsonism (FTDP-17). However, it was soon discovered that 50% of these families had a nearby mutation in progranulin. Regardless, the original FTDP-17 nomenclature has been retained for patients with MAPT mutations, with such patients currently classified independently from the different sporadic forms of FTLD with tau-immunoreactive inclusions (FTLD-tau). The separate classification of familial FTLD with MAPT mutations implies that familial forms cannot inform on the pathogenesis of the different sporadic forms of FTLD-tau. To test this assumption, this study pathologically assessed all FTLD-tau cases with a known MAPT mutation held by the Sydney and Cambridge Brain Banks, and compared them to four cases of four subtypes of sporadic FTLD-tau, in addition to published case reports. Ten FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation (K257T, S305S, P301L, IVS10+16, R406W) were screened for the core differentiating neuropathological features used to diagnose the different sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes to determine whether the categorical separation of MAPT mutations from sporadic FTLD-tau is valid. Compared with sporadic cases, FTLD-tau cases with MAPT mutations had similar mean disease duration but were younger at age of symptom onset (55 ± 4 years versus 70 ± 6 years). Interestingly, FTLD-tau cases with MAPT mutations had similar patterns and severity of neuropathological features to sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes and could be classified into: Pick’s disease (K257T), corticobasal degeneration (S305S, IVS10+16, R406W), progressive supranuclear palsy (S305S) or globular glial tauopathy (P301L, IVS10+16). The finding that the S305S mutation could be classified into two tauopathies suggests additional modifying factors. Assessment of our cases and previous reports suggests that distinct MAPT mutations result in particular FTLD-tau subtypes, supporting the concept that they are likely to inform on the varied cellular mechanisms involved in distinctive forms of sporadic FTLD-tau. As such, FTLD-tau cases with MAPT mutations should be considered familial forms of FTLD-tau subtypes rather than a separate FTDP-17 category, and continued research on the effects of different mutations more focused on modelling their impact to produce the very different sporadic FTLD-tau pathologies in animal and cellular models.

Introduction

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinically, genetically and pathologically diverse group of disorders, with up to 40% of cases having a family history of dementia and/or a movement disorder (Rohrer et al., 2009). The first mutations associated with FTLD were found in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene on chromosome 17 in families with familial frontotemporal degeneration and parkinsonism (FTDP-17) (Hutton et al., 1998; Poorkaj et al., 1998; Spillantini et al., 1998). In 2006, the discovery of mutations in the progranulin (GRN) gene linked to a similar region on chromosome 17 was identified as the second cause of FTDP-17 (Baker et al., 2006; Cruts et al., 2006). Despite the widespread use of this nomenclature and its usefulness in informing on chromosomal linkage, FTDP-17 is not informative for discriminating between MAPT and GRN mutations, nor for describing the underlying proteinopathy seen in the disease. Pathologically, patients with mutations in GRN show FTLD with TAR DNA binding protein 43-immunopositive inclusions (FTLD-TDP) and are subtyped into the same pathological categories as sporadic FTLD-TDP (Rademakers et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2017). The pathogenic mechanisms underlying sporadic and familial FTLD-TDP are thought to be similar, with the four well-described FTLD-TDP pathological subtypes associated with three different genetic abnormalities, including GRN (Rademakers et al., 2013) (Fig. 1). In contrast, some authors have retained the original FTDP-17 nomenclature for patients with mutations in MAPT and these are currently classified separately from the sporadic forms of FTLD with tau-immunoreactive inclusions (FTLD-tau, Fig. 1) (Rohrer et al., 2011; Rademakers et al., 2013; Kovacs, 2015; Lashley et al., 2015; Arendt et al., 2016). Separating FTLD-tau cases with a mutation in MAPT from sporadic cases suggests they have independent pathogenic mechanisms.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Comparison between the main pathological subtypes of FTLD and known gene associations. For FTLD-TDP subtypes, there is an association between specific gene abnormalities and the morphological type of inclusion pathology, suggesting that specific intracellular processes are involved. For FTLD-tau subtypes, genetic forms are considered as a separate group (FTDP-17). We suggest that different mutations in the MAPT gene could inform more about the specific intracellular processes involved in forming the different morphological types of inclusions observed in FTLD-tau. 3R = 3-repeat tau; 4R = 4-repeat tau; GAI = globular astrocytic inclusion; NCIs = neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions; NNIs = neuronal intranuclear inclusions. *Refer to Table 1.

Characterized by the morphology, distribution and biochemical composition of phosphorylated tau in neurons and glia, sporadic FTLD-tau is subdivided into four main pathological subtypes: Pick’s disease, corticobasal degeneration (CBD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and globular glial tauopathy (GGT) (Fig. 1). Argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) and neurofibrillary tangle predominant dementia (NFTPD), which includes primary age-related tauopathy (PART) (Crary et al., 2014) are further recognized subtypes, but comprise a small proportion of FTLD-tau cases (Jellinger and Attems, 2007; Josephs et al., 2011). The neuropathological phenotypes of FTLD-tau associated with MAPT mutations are heterogeneous and vary between and within family members with the same mutation (Stanford et al., 2000; Halliday et al., 2006; Skoglund et al., 2008). In addition, the cell types involved and the cellular compartments that aggregate tau are heterogeneous, and many cases have neuropathological features additional to those of sporadic FTLD-tau (Ghetti et al., 2015; Kovacs, 2015; Lashley et al., 2015). Only recently has there been increased recognition that MAPT mutations may be associated with neuropathological phenotypes of sporadic FTLD-tau (Kovacs, 2015); however, most of these observations are confined to single case reports (Table 1). These studies suggest that FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation have pathological similarities to sporadic FTLD-tau and by identifying subtype-specific features, could be classified into and considered comparable to their sporadic diagnostic counterparts.

Table 1.

MAPT mutations associated with FTLD-tau pathological subtypes

Genetic position Mutation Subtype Tau isoform deposited Filament type Age at onset Disease duration (y) Main clinical diagnosis Reference
Exon 1 R5L PSP 4R Straight 57 5 PSP-RS Poorkaj et al., 2002
R5H GGT 4R Straight tubules 75 6 Dementia NS Hayashi et al., 2002
Exon 9 K257T PiD 3R Twisted ribbons 47 4 bvFTD Rizzini et al., 2000
PiD 3R N/A N/A N/A Pickering-Brown et al., 2000
PiD 3R 64 4 bvFTD Current study
L266V PiD 3R Straight 33 3.5 bvFTD Hogg et al., 2003
PiD 3R 31 3 bvFTD Van Deerlin et al., 2007
PiD 3R 24 7 bvFTD Irwin et al., 2016
G272V PiD 3R Twisted ribbons 45 9 Bronner et al., 2005
PiD 3R Twisted ribbons 52 15 Bronner et al., 2005
Intron 9 IVS9-15* PiD 3R 46 9 bvFTD Anfossi et al., 2011
Exon 10 ΔK280 PiD 3R Twisted 53 10 bvFTD van Swieten et al., 2007
N279K PSP 4R? Twisted ribbons 40 7 PSP Delisle et al., 1999
S285R PSP 4R 40 4 PPSP Fujioka et al., 2015
PSP 4R 41 9 PSP Fujioka et al., 2015
P301L GGT 4R 54 9 bvFTD Current study
GGT 4R 53 12 bvFTD Current study
GGT 4R 66 17 bvFTD Current study
GGT 4R 53 12 bvFTD Tacik et al., 2017b
S303S PSP 4R 37 8 PSP Ros et al., 2005
PSP 4R 41 4 PSP Ros et al., 2005
PSP 4R Late 30s 41 (died) PSP Ros et al., 2005
S305S PSP 4R Twisted + straight 49 2 PSP Stanford et al., 2000; current study
CBD 4R 55 1 bvFTD
CBD 4R 56 7 FT Current study
N296H GGT 4R 57 5 FTD Halliday et al., 2006; current study
S305I AGD 4R Straight tubules 39 1.5 bvFTD Iseki et al., 2001
Straight tubules Kovacs et al., 2008
Intron 10 IVS10+4* PiD 3R Above Above Above Anfossi et al., 2011
IVS10+16 CBD 4R 57 5 AD Current study
CBD 4R 49 14 bvFTD Current study
GGT 4R 55 3 bvFTD Current study
PSP 4R? 40 5 PSP Morris et al., 2003
Exon 11 L315A PiD 3R > 4R 25 8 PPA van Herpen et al., 2003
PiD 3R > 4R Twisted + straight 53 8 bvFTD van Herpen et al., 2003
S320F PiD 3R + 4R Straight + twisted 38 15 bvFTD Rosso et al., 2002
P332S PiD 3R > 4R 60 15 Anarthria + opercular syndrome Deramecourt et al., 2012
K317N GGT 4R Straight 64 5 FTD-MND Tacik et al., 2015b
Exon 12 Q336R PiD 3R + 4R Straight 58 10 FTD Pickering-Brown et al., 2004
Q336H PiD 3R > 4R Straight 55 8 Atypical AD Tacik et al., 2015a
K369I PiD 3R + 4R Twisted 52 9 bvFTD Neumann et al., 2001
G342V PiD 4R > 3R Helical 48 7 PNFA Lippa et al., 2000
Exon 13 E372G PiD 3R + 4R 40 18 bvFTD Tacik et al., 2017a
G389R PiD 3R + 4R 24 7 PNFA/bvFTD Tacik et al., 2017a
PiD 3R + 4R 53 7 bvFTD/CBS Tacik et al., 2017a
PiD 3R + 4R 17 7 bvFTD Chaunu et al., 2013
PiD 3R + 4R 38 5 FTD Ghetti et al., 2000; Murrell et al., 1999
R406W PiD 3R + 4R 32 5 bvFTD Pickering-Brown et al., 2000
N410H CBD 4R 57 17 bvFTD Current study
CBD 4R 63 4 PSP/CBS Kouri et al., 2014
Open in a new tab

*Two intronic mutations in MAPT were identified in this patient.

3R = 3-repeat tau; 4R = 4-repeat tau; AD = Alzheimer’s disease; bvFTD = behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia; CBS = corticobasal syndrome; IR = immunoreactive; NFT = neurofibrillary tangle; NS = not specified; PNFA = progressive non-fluent aphasia; PPA = primary progressive aphasia; RS = Richardson’s syndrome.

To determine whether similar pathologies cluster with different MAPT mutations, an experimental design similar to clinicogenetic associations was used to identify pathogenetic associations. This differs significantly from previous studies using case report designs. By assessing pathological correlations to clustered MAPT mutations in a cohort of pathologically confirmed FTLD cases with MAPT mutations, and by directly comparing their pathologies to those with sporadic FTLD-tau, clear associations can be determined. Similar neuropathological features in both sporadic and FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation would suggest that these cases could be considered as familial forms of the different subtypes of FTLD-tau and on a disease continuum with these sporadic forms, potentially simplifying neuropathological criteria. This may have important implications for the recent study by the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI) demonstrating that structural imaging changes occur in pre-symptomatic MAPT mutation carriers 15 years before their estimated symptom onset (Rohrer et al., 2015). Subtype analysis of those with different MAPT mutations associated with different sporadic FTLD-tau forms may be more informative for the larger populations of FTLD-tau patients.

Materials and methods

Cohort

The Sydney-Cambridge cohort (n = 188) was used to identify all MAPT gene mutation cases (n = 10 of 173 FTLD-tau cases in which definitive genetic data could be obtained) and were compared with 16 sporadic FTLD-tau cases with Pick’s disease (n = 4), CBD (n = 4), PSP (n = 4) and GGT (n = 4) subtypes. No other age-related primary tauopathies were used for comparison in this study. Ethical approval, recruitment processes and genetic screening techniques are provided in the Supplementary material, and demographic details for cases included in this study are shown in Table 2. Due to the recent changes to the reference MAPT transcripts used to annotate the position and nature of the nucleotide substitutions described in this study, their corresponding reference SNP (rs) numbers and updated exonic positions are listed in Supplementary Table 1. However, in the text and figures we will use the traditional nomenclature for clear comparisons.

Table 2.

Demographic details and distribution of neuronal loss associated with FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation and FTLD-tau subtypes

Cases
1 2 3a 4b 5 6 7 8 9 10 PiDc CBDc PSPc GGTc
Gender M M F F F M M M M F 2:2 3:1 3:1 3:1
Age at diagnosis (y) 64 55 56 49 57 57 49 55 54 54 70 ± 5 67 ± 4 67 ± 7 74 ± 8
Disease duration (y) 4 1 7 2 17 5 14 3 4 9 8 ± 3 5 ± 3 4 ± 2 5 ± 3
MAPT mutation K257T S305S S305S S305S R406W +16 +16 +16 +16 P301L
FTLD-tau subtype PiD CBD CBD PSP CBD CBD CBD GGT GGT GGT
Neuronal loss
Superior frontal cortex ++ ++ ++ + + + + ++ ++ ++ 0,0,1,3 0,3,1,0 2,2,0,0 0,2,1,1
Precentral cortex − +++ + ++ − − − − − − 2,2,0,0 2,1,0,0d 2,2,0,0 2,1,1,0
Inferior temporal cortex ++ +++ + + + + + ++ +++ +++ 0,0,1,3 0,3,0,1 2,2,0,0 0,2,2,0
Entorhinal cortex + + + + + ++ + ++ ++ + 0,0,0,4 2,0,1,1 2,2,0,0 1,2,0,1
Hippocampus
    Dentate gyrus − + + − + + + − − − 3,0,0,1 2,2,0,0 3,1,0,0 4,0,0,0
    CA1 ++ + ++ + +++ ++ + + ++ + 0,2,0,2 2,0,0,2 2,1,1,0 2,1,0,1
Basal ganglia − + + ++ − + − ++ + ++ 1,1,1,1 1,2,0,0d 1,2,1,0 1,2,1,0
Midbrain ++ +++ +++ ++ + + + +++ ++ ++ 1,2,1,0 0,0,2,2 0,1,1,2 1,1,2,0
Pons − +++ − + − − − +++ +++ − 1,3,0,0 3,0,1,0 2,2,0,0 1,3,0,0
STN − ++ − 0,1,2,1 4,0,0,0
Medulla − − − − − − − − − − 2,2,0,0 4,0,0,0 3,1,0,0 4,0,0,0
Open in a new tab

CA1 = hippocampal CA1 region; CBD = corticobasal degeneration; PiD = Picks disease; STN = subthalamic nucleus.

Severity of neuronal loss in FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation was graded as none (−), mild (+), moderate (++) or severe (+++).

a,bS305S siblings previously reported in Halliday et al., 2006a and Stanford et al., 2000b.

cFor FTLD-tau cases with PiD (n = 4), CBD (n = 4), PSP (n = 4) and GGT (n = 4) subtypes, gender is expressed as the number of males and females (M:F). Age at symptom onset and disease duration are expressed as the mean ± SD. Severity of neuronal loss is expressed as the number of cases within each subtype with no, mild, moderate or severe neuronal loss.

dThe precentral cortex and basal ganglia were unavailable for one CBD case.

Analyses

All FTLD cases were classified into pathological subtypes throughout the collection period using standardized diagnostic procedures and assigned a family history score using Goldman criteria (Goldman et al., 2005). MAPT mutations were identified in eight independent families and included P301L (exon 10; n = 1), IVS10+16 (intron 10; n = 4, unrelated) and R406W (exon 13; n = 1), K257T (exon 9; n = 1) and S305S [exon 10; n = 3, all siblings from the same family and two have been reported previously (Stanford et al., 2000; Halliday et al., 2006)]. The pattern and severity of neuronal loss and neuropathological features immunostained for phosphorylated tau (AT8), and for tau with three (3R-tau) or four (4R-tau) microtubule binding sites were recorded in MAPT mutation cases and compared to FTLD-tau cases with no or low heritability (n = 4/subtype). Selection of brain regions of interest was based on key areas routinely sampled for standard FTLD neuropathological assessment (Table 2) (Hauw et al., 1994; Dickson et al., 2002; Cairns et al., 2007; Ahmed et al., 2013).

See Supplementary material for more details on the analyses used in this study.

Results

Cases with specific MAPT mutation have the same characteristic pathologies as particular sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes

Pick’s disease

The FTLD-tau case with a K257T MAPT mutation had the same hallmark neuropathological features (AT8-immunopositive Pick bodies, ballooned neurons, ramified astrocytes, threads, coiled bodies and globular oligodendroglial inclusions) as sporadic Pick’s disease cases (Cairns et al., 2007) (Tables 2, 3 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Immunostaining with 3R-tau labelled a similar number of neuropathological features as those labelled with AT8, except ramified astrocytes that were only immunoreactive for 4R-tau. In addition, there was a similar pattern and severity of neuronal loss and gliosis as observed in sporadic Pick’s disease cases (Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1E). AT8-immunopositive astrocytic plaques and tufted astrocytes characteristic of CBD and PSP, respectively, were not observed.

Table 3.

Severity of neuropathological features in the superior frontal cortex immunostained with phosphorylated tau in FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation and in Pick’s disease, CBD, PSP and GGT subtypes

Cases
1 2 3a 4b 5 6 7 8 9 10 PiDc CBDc PSPc GGTc
MAPT mutation K257T S305S S305S S305S R406W +16 +16 +16 +16 P301L
FTLD-tau subtype PiD CBD CBD PSP CBD CBD CBD GGT GGT GGT
Neuronal
Pick bodies +++ − − − − − − − − − 0,1,1,2 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0
Balloon neurons ++ + + ++ + ++ + + − + 1,1,2,0 0,3,1,0 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0
Peri-nuclear rings − + + + − − − − − − 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0
Astrocytic
Ramified astrocytes + − − − − − − − − − 0,1,2,1 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0
Astrocytic plaques − + + ++ + + + − − − 4,0,0,0 0,0,1,3 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0
Tufted astrocytes − + + + − − − − − − 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 0,2,2,0 4,0,0,0
GAIs − − − − − − − ++ +++ ++ 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 4,0,0,0 0,2,1,1
Threads - GM ++ + + +++ + ++ ++ ++ +++ ++ 1,1,2,0 0,1,1,2 2,2,0,0 2,0,2,0
Threads - WM ++ +++ +++ ++ + +++ +++ +++ +++ ++ 0,4,0,0 0,0,3,1 0,4,0,0 1,2,0,1
Oligodendroglial
Coiled bodies - GM + ++ + ++ + + ++ +++ +++ + 0,3,1,0 0,2,2,0 0,1,3,0 0,3,1,0
Coiled bodies - WM ++ +++ +++ ++ − +++ +++ +++ +++ ++ 0,2,2,0 0,0,4,0 0,0,2,2 0,0,3,1
GOIs - GM ++ + ++ +++ + ++ + +++ +++ + 0,2,2,0 0,1,3,0 3,1,0,0 0,2,2,0
GOIs - WM + + ++ ++ − ++ ++ +++ +++ ++ 0,4,0,0 0,2,2,0 4,0,0,0 0,2,1,1
Open in a new tab

CBD = corticobasal degeneration; GAIs = globular astrocytic inclusions; GM = grey matter; GOIs = globular oligodendroglial inclusions; PiD = Picks disease; WM = white matter.

Severity of neuropathological features immunostained with phosphorylated tau in FTLD-tau cases with a MAPT mutation was graded as none (−), mild (+), moderate (++) or severe (+++).

a,bS305S siblings previously reported in Halliday et al., 2006a and Stanford et al., 2000b.

cFor FTLD-tau cases with PiD (n = 4), CBD (n = 4), PSP (n = 4) and GGT (n = 4) subtypes, severity of neuropathological features immunostained with phosphorylated tau is expressed as the number of cases within each subtype with no, mild, moderate or severe pathological lesions.

Corticobasal degeneration

Five FTLD-tau cases with a mutation in MAPT (S305S, R406W, IVS10+16) had characteristic neuropathological features of sporadic CBD (moderate-to-severe number of AT8-immunostained astrocytic plaques and thread pathology) (Dickson et al., 2002; Cairns et al., 2007) (Tables 2, 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Immunostaining with 4R-tau labelled a similar number of neuropathological features as those labelled with AT8. Immunostaining with 3R-tau was absent or rare in sporadic CBD cases, confined to occasional neurofibrillary tangles and neurites in one case.

Two of the three siblings from the Sydney S305S family have been reported previously and demonstrate that the neuropathology associated with MAPT mutations can be heterogeneous, even between family members with the same mutation. Although both reported cases had a similar distribution of neuronal loss (Table 2), one case had pathologically confirmed CBD (Case 3) (Halliday et al., 2006), and the other pathologically confirmed PSP with associated subcortical neuronal loss and neurofibrillary tangle formation (Case 4) (Stanford et al., 2000). The third S305S sibling had pathologically confirmed CBD (Case 2), reported for the first time in this study, with the shortest disease duration and the most widespread and greatest severity of neuronal loss of all siblings (Table 2). The severity of neuropathological features immunostained with AT8 was heterogeneous between siblings but was most similar in the two siblings with CBD, which had a similar distribution and severity of AT8-immunopositive ballooned neurons, astrocytic plaques, grey and white matter thread pathology, coiled bodies and globular oligodendroglial inclusions (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2F–J). The distribution of neuronal loss and these neuropathological features immunostained with AT8 was similar to all sporadic CBD cases. Argyrophilic AT8-immunopositive tufted astrocytes were also observed in affected cortical regions of both siblings with CBD pathology. In addition, both siblings had AT8-immunopositive perinuclear rings in all cortical regions examined and AT8-immunopositive grain-like structures in cortical regions and the hippocampus. These grain-like structures were non-argyrophilic on Gallyas and modified Bielschowsky silver stains and did not resemble the spindle-shaped grains observed in argyrophilic grain disease. All neuropathological features in both siblings were 4R-tau-immunoreactive. 3R-tau immunostaining was not observed.

The FTLD-tau case with an R406W mutation (Case 5) had limited cortical and subcortical neuronal loss (Table 2), although the pattern and distribution of neuronal loss, gliosis and neuropathological features immunostained with AT8 was similar to all sporadic CBD cases (Supplementary Fig. 2K–O). These neuropathological features were 4R-tau-immunopositive and negative for 3R-tau-immunoreactivity. In addition, occasional argyrophilic and AT8-immunopositive round neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were observed in granular neurons in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. These neuronal inclusions closely resembled the morphology of Pick bodies in Pick’s disease except they were 4R-tau-immunoreactive and did not contain 3R-tau-immunoreactivity. Numerous neurofibrillary tangles were also present in the hippocampal dentate gyrus but they had a limited distribution cortically and subcortically.

Both unrelated FTLD-tau cases with an IVS10+16 mutation (Cases 6 and 7) had limited neuronal loss and gliosis although the pattern and distribution was similar to sporadic FTLD-tau cases with CBD subtype (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2P–T). Similar AT8-immunopositive neuropathological features were observed in both cases. The severity of neuropathological features immunostained with AT8 was similar in both cases; however, fewer AT8-immunopositive astrocytic plaques were observed than in sporadic CBD cases (Table 3). Immunostaining with 4R-tau in both cases labelled a similar number of neuropathological features immunostained with AT8, which did not contain 3R-tau-immunoreactivity.

Progressive supranuclear palsy

One sibling with the S305S mutation had similar hallmark neuropathological features of PSP, which were present in all sporadic cases (Hauw et al., 1994; Cairns et al., 2007) (Tables 2, 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3). Immunostaining for 4R-tau in sporadic PSP cases labelled a similar number of neuropathological features as those labelled with AT8. Immunostaining with 3R-tau was limited to some neurofibrillary tangles.

The S305S sibling with PSP (Case 4) described here and in Stanford et al. (2000) had a similar distribution of neuronal loss as the other S305S siblings, but additional neuronal loss in the subthalamic nucleus (Table 2). This sibling had argyrophilic AT8-immunopositive tufted astrocytes and coiled bodies in affected cortical regions, neuronal loss and neurofibrillary tangle formation in the basal ganglia, midbrain, pons and subthalamic nucleus (Supplementary Fig. 3D–F), consistent with sporadic PSP. Other AT8-immunopositive neuropathological features, including ballooned neurons, astrocytic plaques, threads and globular oligodendroglial inclusions, were observed (Supplementary Fig. 3G–I). Interestingly, a greater number of astrocytic plaques was observed in this sibling in comparison to the two CBD siblings (Table 3). Similar to the CBD siblings, this sibling had AT8-immunopositive perinuclear rings and grain-like structures in the same brain regions as described above. Immunostaining with 4R-tau labelled a similar number of neuropathological features as observed with AT8 immunostaining. 3R-tau immunostaining was restricted to some neurofibrillary tangles.

Globular glial tauopathy

Three cases with a mutation in MAPT (P301L, IVS10+16) had characteristic neuropathological features of sporadic GGT (Ahmed et al., 2013), similar to all other GGT cases (Tables 2, 3 and Supplementary Fig. 4). The distribution and severity of globular glial inclusions was heterogeneous between sporadic cases (Table 3) and varied between the grey and white matter of affected cortical regions, which is likely to reflect different pathological GGT subtypes (Ahmed et al., 2013). Immunostaining with 4R-tau labelled a similar number of neuropathological features as those labelled with AT8. Immunostaining with 3R-tau was absent in all sporadic GGT cases.

The FTLD-tau cases with an IVS10+16 mutation (Cases 8 and 9) were associated with the most widespread and the greatest severity of neuronal loss (Table 2). Neuropathological features resembling sporadic FTLD-tau with GGT subtype were observed including AT8-immunopositive globular astrocytic inclusions and globular oligodendroglial inclusions (Tables 2, 3 and Supplementary Fig. 4D and E). AT8-immunopositive ballooned neurons, threads and coiled bodies were also observed (Supplementary Fig. 4F). All neuropathological features were immunostained with 4R-tau, which labelled a similar number of neuropathological features as AT8. Immunostaining with 3R-tau, and AT8-immunuopositive astrocytic plaques and tufted astrocytes were absent.

The FTLD-tau case with a P301L mutation (Case 10) had a similar distribution and severity of neuronal loss and neuropathological features as sporadic FTLD-tau cases with GGT subtype (Tables 2 and 3, Supplementary Fig. 4G–I). Immunostaining with 4R-tau labelled a similar number of neuropathological features immunostained with AT8, which did not contain 3R-tau-immunoreactivity. AT8-immnopositive astrocytic plaques or tufted astrocytes were not observed.

Analysis of pathogenetic correlations

Assessment of data from the literature (Table 1) and our cases show that different regions of the MAPT gene appear to associate with only certain pathological FTLD-tau subtypes, with particular molecular and morphological signatures. The regions around exon and intron 10 associated with all pathological subtypes depositing 4R-tau (Fig. 2). While there is considerable overlap in the exon and intron 10 mutations associated with 4R-tau subtypes CBD, PSP and GGT, CBD pathology is consistently associated with the exon 13 R406W mutation (Fig. 2). Also, 3R-tau Pick’s disease is most associated with mutations in exon and intron 9 (Fig. 2), although there seems to be Pick’s disease cases with both 3R-tau and 4R-tau with mutations in exons 11 to 13 that require reanalyses. It would be important to know if the neuronal tau inclusions in these cases were composed of only 3R-tau, as observed in sporadic Pick’s disease cases, as glial tau is often 4R-tau. Of importance in the present study, each FTLD-tau case with a MAPT mutation had similar hallmark neuropathological features, both molecularly and morphologically, to one of the sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Diagrammatic representation of the location of different mutations in the MAPT gene associated with the diagnostic pathologies for sporadic FTLD-tau. Those exons not highlighted may contribute to subtype specific neuropathology, but at present require reassessment to confirm. Point mutations in exon 9 and intron 9, and a deletion in exon 10, give rise to more 3R-tau which accumulates in Pick bodies found in Pick’s disease (PiD, colour-coded yellow). Point mutations in exon 13 cause dysfunction of membrane associated 4R-tau, which accumulates in the endfeet of astrocytic plaques in CBD (colour-coded blue). A point mutation in exon 11 gives rise to both short and long 4R-tau filaments that accumulate in globules in GGT (colour-coded green). A point mutation in exon 1 has been associated with longer filaments that accumulate in tufted astrocytes and neurofibrillary tangles in PSP (colour-coded red). Point mutations in exon 10 and intron 10 give rise to increased 4R-tau and CBD, GGT or PSP, suggesting that additional modifying factors can influence the processes producing these pathologies.

Assessment of demographic differences between MAPT mutations and sporadic FTLD-tau

The FTLD-tau cases with MAPT mutations were significantly younger at age of symptom onset compared with the sporadic FTLD-tau cases [P < 0.001; MAPT mutation 55 ± 4 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 52.0–58.0 versus FTLD-tau 70 ± 6 years, 95% CI 66.2–72.9]. Disease duration varied widely across the FTLD-tau cases ranging from 1 to 17 years (mean for cohort = 6 ± 5 years) with no difference in duration between sporadic (6 ± 3 years) and MAPT mutation (6 ± 5 years) FTLD-tau cases. The difference in age of symptom onset in FTLD-tau cases with MAPT mutations was confirmed in cases with CBD and GGT subtypes. CBD and GGT cases with a MAPT mutation were significantly younger at age of symptom onset compared with sporadic FTLD-tau CBD and sporadic FTLD-tau GGT subtypes (CBD: P = 0.016; MAPT mutation 55 ± 3 years, 95% CI 50.6–59.0 versus FTLD-tau CBD 67 ± 4 years, 95% CI 61.6–74.4. GGT: P = 0.029; MAPT mutation 55 ± 2 years, 95% CI 52.9–55.8 versus FTLD-tau GGT 74 ± 8 years, 95% CI 59.5–87.0).

Discussion

The present study illustrates the similarities in the hallmark neuropathological features of FTLD-tau cases with specific MAPT mutations and the varied subtypes of sporadic FTLD-tau, and demonstrates that MAPT mutation status also influences age of symptom onset. In any classification scheme the identification of differentiating neuropathological features is important, with a necessary emphasis on overlapping or additional pathologies. While age-related and incidental pathologies occur in sporadic and genetic forms of FTLD-tau, additional secondary pathologies reaching neuropathological diagnostic criteria are thought to be rare and comprise a small proportion of cases. Although FTLD-tau cases with mutations in MAPT are considered independently in FTLD-tau consensus criteria (Cairns et al., 2007; Kovacs, 2015), the same core differentiating neuropathological features present in defined sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes were easily identified in each case. Importantly, the data indicate that abnormalities in different regions of the MAPT gene are likely to associate with different types of FTLD-tau pathologies, while those around exon 10 and intron 10 impact on all FTLD-tau subtypes with additional modifying factors likely to be involved.

While FTLD-tau cases with mutations in MAPT have been associated previously with the neuropathological features similar to sporadic Pick’s disease, CBD, PSP, AGD and GGT (Table 1), pathological phenotype to genotype associations have not been systematically characterized. Analysis of these data suggests that 27 different MAPT mutations out of the reported 44 mutations in 134 families on the Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Mutation Database (AD&FTD) describe a characteristic pathology similar to the different sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes, indicating 59% of MAPT cases are associated with a particular sporadic FTLD-tau subtype (Table 1 and Fig. 2). By identifying subtype-specific pathologies in FTLD-tau cases with known mutations in MAPT, these associations can be made and cases classified into similar diagnostic FTLD-tau categories (Hauw et al., 1994; Dickson et al., 2002; Cairns et al., 2007; Ahmed et al., 2013) to identify familial forms of these FTLD-tau subtypes and assist with genetic modelling of these different tau pathologies. That such modelling can replicate mutation-specific pathologies has been shown by Ittner and colleagues (Ittner et al., 2008) in their K369I mouse model of the MAPT mutation identified by Neumann et al. (2001). While several features common to more than one FTLD-tau subtype are found in most MAPT cases (for example ballooned neurons, coiled bodies, globular oligodendroglial inclusions) (Ferrer et al., 2014), the unique and characteristic neuropathological features for each subtype were easily identified in affected cortical regions immunostained with the AT8 antibody. This has important implications for pathogenetic correlations and animal modelling of these different forms of sporadic FTLD-tau.

The impact of heritability and known genetic mutations, including MAPT, on patient survival and age of symptom onset is heterogeneous in frontotemporal dementia (Hodges et al., 2003; van Swieten and Spillantini, 2007; Rohrer et al., 2009; Chiu et al., 2010; Po et al., 2014; Domoto-Reilly et al., 2017). This study demonstrates that FTLD-tau cases with a mutation in MAPT are significantly younger at age of symptom onset than sporadic FTLD-tau cases, and also than other genetic forms of frontotemporal dementia (Le Ber et al., 2013; Rohrer et al., 2015; Gasca-Salas et al., 2016). In this aspect, MAPT mutations are similar for FTLD-tau as the early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease due to mutations in the presenilin-encoding PSEN 1 and 2 genes (Schellenberg and Montine, 2012). While the mechanism of an earlier onset for presenilin gene mutations is known [they make more damaging amlyloid-β1-42 (Schellenberg and Montine, 2012)], the mechanism/s for an earlier onset of symptoms in MAPT mutation carriers is less obvious. However, as additional functions of tau beyond microtubule stability grows [e.g. nuclear and dendritic functions (Frost et al., 2014; Ittner et al., 2016)], new insights into variations in pathogenesis are likely to be revealed. Not surprisingly, since FTLD-tau cases with a mutation in MAPT reported in this study have a wide variation in disease duration (range 1 to 17 years), no difference in survival was found compared to sporadic FTLD-tau cases. This suggests that the disease course is likely to be similar for FTLD-tau cases with and without mutations in MAPT.

As expected, the FTLD-tau pathologies depositing 4R-tau isoforms can have similar intron 10 mutations (Fig. 2). These mutations do not change the tau protein structure but increase the concentration of 4R-tau by causing a more frequent usage of the 5′ splice site and an increased inclusion of exon 10 and 4R-tau that is seen in three of the four main FTLD-tau subtypes (Ahmed et al., 2013; Spillantini and Goedert, 2013; Kovacs, 2015). We suggest that more attention should be paid to the similar MAPT mutations that can produce divergent pathological lesions, as this suggests that environmental and/or genetic modifiers must occur to produce the different 4R-tau FTLD subtypes. Alternatively, significant differences in tau function are likely with the MAPT gene variants that associate only with one of the different sporadic forms of FTLD-tau (Fig. 2). Identifying distinctive MAPT mechanisms underlying different FTLD-tau pathologies may be important for sporadic forms of these diseases. These differences will be discussed below for each sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes analysed.

Pick bodies, and mechanisms associated with MAPT mutations

Although Pick’s disease neuropathology is thought to be rare, it has been documented in 30% of FTLD-tau patients in five large autopsy cohorts (Josephs et al., 2011). It is pathologically characterized by round neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, most easily found in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, that contain 3R-tau and not 4R-tau, and even minor deviations from this pattern suggests a different disorder (Kovacs et al., 2013). Clinicopathological studies of neuropathologically confirmed Pick’s disease suggest that survival outcomes can be predicted from clinical features present at initial presentation. With an average age at symptom onset of 57 years and disease duration of around 9 years (Yokota et al., 2009; Irwin et al., 2016), the most common first syndrome in Pick’s disease cases is behavioural variant (bv)FTD (comprising 64–86% of cases), followed by primary progressive aphasia (PPA) (Yokota et al., 2009; Piguet et al., 2011; Irwin et al., 2016). A recent study describing four pathological stages of Pick’s disease in 21 cases (age at onset 57 ± 13 years, duration 9 ± 4 years) included two Pick’s disease cases with a L266V mutation, which were characterized by a very early age of onset (24 and 30 years, respectively) and duration (7 and 5 years, respectively), and severe tau pathology (stage IV) (Irwin et al., 2016). The Pick’s disease case with the K257T mutation in the current study differed and had more similar demographic features, distribution and severity of neuronal loss and tau-immunoreactive and biochemical features as sporadic Pick’s disease.

Over half of the MAPT mutations described with characteristic pathology similar to sporadic FTLD-tau subtypes report Pick’s disease pathology (15 out of 27 mutations). These mutations occur in exons 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, and introns 9 and 10 (Table 1). However, many of these case reports describe both 3R-tau and 4R-tau isoforms often demonstrated in extracts obtained from dissociated tissue (Table 1). Unless immunohistochemistry using antibodies against 3R-tau and 4R-tau is used to determine the molecular characteristics of their neuropathological features (Kovacs et al., 2013), the pathology in these cases is difficult to interpret. Three mutations in exon 9 (L257T, L226V and G272V), one deletion in exon 10 (ΔK280) and two intronic mutations (IVS9-15 and IVS10+4) have Pick’s disease pathology characterized by 3R-tau Pick bodies (Fig. 2). It is particularly interesting that mutations in exon 9 and intron 9 give rise to only 3R-tau Pick’s disease pathology (Fig. 2). 4R-tau in these cases is confined to ramified astrocytes and rare neurofibrillary tangles (Hogg et al., 2003; Bronner et al., 2005; Anfossi et al., 2011), consistent with descriptions of sporadic Pick’s disease (Kovacs et al., 2013). The three missense exon 9 mutations reduce the binding of tau to microtubules, enhancing 3R-tau but not 4R-tau assembly, leading to increased unbound 3R-tau that is available to aggregate into filaments (Pickering-Brown et al., 2000; Rizzini et al., 2000; Hogg et al., 2003; Bronner et al., 2005). The ΔK280 deletion in exon 10 disrupts an exon 10 splicing enhancer, which produces a 2-fold decrease of 4R-tau mRNA transcripts and a corresponding increase of unbound 3R-tau (D’Souza and Schellenberg, 2006; van Swieten et al., 2007). The IVS9-15 mutation is located in the 3’ splice site region of exon 10 and little is known about how this mutation leads to the aggregation of 3R-tau. The IVS10+4 mutation is located in the 5′ site region on the stem loop, which is thought to destabilize this structure. The combination of both these mutations in the one patient with Pick’s disease characterized by 3R-tau Pick bodies is thought to alter exon 10 splicing mechanisms leading to an increase of 3R-tau, as both mutations are found in regulatory splicing regions (Anfossi et al., 2011).

CBD astrocytic plaques, PSP tufted astrocytes, and mechanisms associated with MAPT mutations

It has been known for some time that while the characteristic lesions of CBD (tau-positive astrocytic plaques and thread-like lesions in both the white and grey matter) discriminates CBD from the other FTLD-tau subtypes, they do not discriminate sporadic CBD cases from those with MAPT mutations (Dickson et al., 2002) and therefore recent clinical criteria exclude cases with a family history or MAPT mutation from a diagnosis of probable (although not possible) CBD (Armstrong et al., 2013). It has also been long recognized that there is considerable clinical, pathological and genetic overlap between CBD and PSP (Katsuse et al., 2003; Lang, 2003; Tan et al., 2005; Jung et al., 2012) with genome wide association studies showing that common polymorphisms in MAPT, MOBP and VEGFA increase the risk for both CBD and PSP (Borroni et al., 2010; Kouri et al., 2014, 2015). While familial forms of the CBD pathological subtype are recognized (Dickson et al., 2002), familial forms of PSP occur but are considered rare (<10% of cases) (de Yebenes et al., 1995; Rojo et al., 1999; Vanacore et al., 2001; Ros et al., 2005; Donker Kaat et al., 2009; Rohrer et al., 2011; Fujioka et al., 2015), possibly because of the more typical motor phenotype being identified with pathological PSP. Together, CBD and PSP pathologies form the largest proportion of FTLD-tau cases in five large autopsy cohorts (Josephs et al., 2011), with CBD distinguished by 4R-tau astrocytic plaques and PSP by 4R-tau neurofibrillary tangles and tufted astrocytes (Kouri et al., 2011b; Ferrer et al., 2014; Kovacs, 2015). The regional pattern rather than type of these pathologies determines the clinical phenotype making clinical prediction of pathology difficult (Dickson et al., 2010; Ling et al., 2010; Boeve, 2011; Kouri et al., 2011a, b; Chahine et al., 2014; Grijalvo-Perez and Litvan, 2014; Ouchi et al., 2014; Maltete, 2016). Of importance is that in both disorders 4R-tau isoforms deposit in the characteristic lesions in brain astrocytes, but within different cellular compartments (endfeet in the astrocytic plaques of CBD and somatodendritic compartment in the tufted astrocytes of PSP). Because of this significant overlap and targeting of the same cell type with the similar pathogenic tau isoforms, it has been suggested that these disorders should be grouped together rather than split into distinct subtypes (Scaravilli et al., 2005), a concept that may assist significantly with the considerable overlap observed clinically (Dickson et al., 2010; Ling et al., 2010; Boeve, 2011; Kouri et al., 2011a, b; Chahine et al., 2014; Grijalvo-Perez and Litvan, 2014; Ouchi et al., 2014; Maltete, 2016).

The assessment of the similarities (and differences) in the genetics of the FTLD-tau subtypes of CBD and PSP has not been focused on, and may prove informative. Of interest is the finding that both pathological subtypes can occur in the same family with the same mutation (present study and Tuite et al., 2005). The significant overlap between clinical, genetic and pathological structures involved in CBD and PSP suggests that additional genetic and/or environmental factors may be important mediators of the different cellular pathologies observed. Of note, the genetic mutations that overlap (e.g. S305S, IVS10+16 in the present cohort) are those that do not change tau protein structure but predispose to increased 4R-tau (Fig. 2). In this context additional genetic influences are likely and have been observed [(Hoglinger et al., 2011; Ferrari et al., 2014; Kouri et al., 2015); ARL17A/ARL17B risk alleles associate with more tufted astrocytes in PSP (Allen et al., 2016); polymorphisms in PARK2 associate with PSP (Sanchez et al., 2002; Ros et al., 2008)]. In addition, different MAPT mutations that change tau protein structure have been associated with either CBD or PSP (Fig. 2) suggesting that tau conformation or interactions with binding proteins are important for these different pathological subtypes. In the present series, the case with the R406W missense mutation in exon 13, a relatively common mutation (at least 13 families on http://www.molgen.ua.ac.be/ADMutations/), had CBD pathology. Another close mutation on exon 13 (N410H) has also been identified in patients with CBD pathology (Kouri et al., 2014). Recent data suggest that rather than having an impact on microtubule interactions (van Swieten et al., 1999; Reed et al., 2001), R406W abolishes tau’s membrane binding (Gauthier-Kemper et al., 2011). In astrocytes, this may have the largest impact at the membrane-binding endfeet and predispose to CBD pathology. It will be important to determine the degree to which other MAPT mutations also disrupt membrane binding and any potential common mechanism/s.

In contrast, MAPT mutations associated with PSP pathology occur mainly in exon 10 and in rare instances in exon 1 (Fig. 2). The most common exon 10 mutations appear to increase the binding of exonic splicer enhancers to generate more 4R-tau (Jiang et al., 2003; Kondo et al., 2004; D'Souza and Schellenberg, 2006). The R5L mutation in exon 1 has only been found in a single family and is at the N-terminus rather than the C-terminus that carries the R406W CBD-causing mutation (Fig. 2). The R5L MAPT mutation induces fewer albeit longer filaments than wild-type tau protein, with this N-terminal region having an enhancing effect on aggregation most likely due to alterations in the global hairpin conformation of tau (Combs and Gamblin, 2012). It may be that the other MAPT mutations may also align to affect the hairpin conformation of tau that enhances the characteristic filaments of 4R-tau found in the tufted astrocytes and globose tangles of PSP.

GGT and mechanisms associated with MAPT mutations

The most recently identified pathological subtype of FTLD-tau is the GGT subtype, with pathological consensus on its characteristic globular glial inclusions published only in 2013 (Ahmed et al., 2013). It is a rarer form of FTLD-tau (<10%, Burrell et al., 2016), which has contributed to it only being recently recognized. As a new form of FTLD-tau, its relationship to MAPT mutations has not been examined in detail, although a novel mutation in exon 11 (K317N) has already been associated with this pathological subtype (Tacik et al., 2015b). This mutation has a reduced ability to promote tubulin polymerization, and decreases 3R-tau binding thereby increasing 4R-tau assembly (Tacik et al., 2015b). An earlier study reported a missense R5H mutation in exon 1 in a case with widespread globular oligodendroglial and astrocytic inclusions, which also increases 4R-tau assembly (Hayashi et al., 2002), and is likely to meet neuropathological criteria for GGT (Ahmed et al., 2013). Of importance is our finding and that of Tacik et al. (2017b) that cases with the exon 10 P301L MAPT mutation, currently the most prevalent MAPT mutation (http://www.molgen.ua.ac.be/ADMutations/), can have GGT pathology (Fig. 2). The distinctive but rare GGT pathology in MAPT mutation cases may explain why the GGT FTLD-tau subtype was not identified for so long, as most cases may have been considered to be MAPT mutation cases with a different morphological pathology to other FTLD-tau subtypes of Pick’s disease, CBD and PSP. Of interest is the recent finding that induced pluripotent stem cells carrying the P301L mutation have contorted processes with varicosity-like structures that appear similar to the GGT pathological subtype (Iovino et al., 2015). This may be due to the increased phosphorylation and aggregation properties of the mutant P301L tau protein (Aoyagi et al., 2007; Combs and Gamblin, 2012) that perturbs its chaperone-assisted stabilization (Gunawardana et al., 2015). In addition, exon 10 mutations at position N296H have also been described as having GGT-like pathology (Iseki et al., 2001). Disruption at this site in the MAPT gene increases 4R-tau isoform levels and causes aggregates of mixed short and long filaments (Yoshida et al., 2002; Combs and Gamblin, 2012). This suggests that pathological globular 4R-tau cellular structures are likely to occur through several mechanisms which potentially give rise to a mixture of highly phosphorylated 4R-tau filament lengths.

Conclusion

In summary, these results indicate that FTLD-tau cases with different MAPT mutations can be considered as familial forms of the different subtypes of sporadic FTLD-tau, including those with 3R-tau isoforms. Understanding the potential mechanisms for the different sporadic forms of FTLD-tau is unlikely to be achieved if familial forms of FTLD-tau are considered independently. As with other neurodegenerative diseases, analysis of genetic cases with similar pathologies has identified important molecular mechanisms and modifiers. Modifying factors are likely to be particularly important for the very distinctive pathologies observed with mutations giving rise to 4R-tauopathies. The classification of FTLD-tau cases with different MAPT mutations as familial forms of the different types of sporadic FTLD-tau will allow important insights into the molecular understanding of these distinctive FTLD-tau pathologies. While FTLD-tau cases with MAPT mutations are associated with a younger age of symptom onset than sporadic FTLD-tau cases, no differences in disease duration have been identified, suggesting similar disease courses. In combination with distinctive cellular and animal models (Ittner et al., 2015), further functional characterizations of the different MAPT mutations is likely to significantly improve the understanding of the pathogenesis of the different forms of sporadic FTLD-tau.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures
Click here for additional data file. (4.7MB, pdf)
Supplementary Methods
Click here for additional data file. (294.9KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 1
Click here for additional data file. (157.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This study is only possible because of the generous donation by participating patients and families. We wish to thank the staff of the Sydney Brain Bank for tissue preparation and initial characterization of the Sydney cases (supported by the University of New South Wales and Neuroscience Research Australia), the staff of the Cambridge Brain Bank for tissue preparation of the Cambridge cases, and Dr John H. Xuereb for initial neuropathological diagnosis of the Cambridge cases.

Funding

This work was supported by funding to ForeFront, a collaborative research group dedicated to the study of frontotemporal dementia and motor neurone disease, from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) program grant to G.H., J.G., L.I., J.K., J.H. and M.K. (#1037746) and dementia research team grant to G.H., J.H., J.J.K., J.B.K. and M.K. (#1095127); L.I. is a NHMRC Senior Research Fellow (#1003083); G.H. is a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow (#1079679); autopsy collection through the Cambridge Brain Bank was supported by the UK Medical Research Council; autopsy collection through the Sydney Brain Bank was supported by the University of New South Wales and Neuroscience Research Australia.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain online.

Glossary

Abbreviations

3R-tau

tau protein with three microtubule binding domains

4R-tau

tau protein with four microtubule binding domains

CBD

corticobasal degeneration

FTDP-17

frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17

FTLD

frontotemporal lobar degeneration

FTLD-tau

FTLD with tau-immunopositive inclusions

GGT

globular glial tauopathy

PSP

progressive supranuclear palsy

References

  1. Ahmed Z, Bigio EH, Budka H, Dickson DW, Ferrer I, Ghetti B, et al. Globular glial tauopathies (GGT): consensus recommendations. Acta Neuropathol 2013; 126: 537–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen M, Burgess JD, Ballard T, Serie D, Wang X, Younkin CS, et al. Gene expression, methylation and neuropathology correlations at progressive supranuclear palsy risk loci. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 132: 197–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anfossi M, Vuono R, Maletta R, Virdee K, Mirabelli M, Colao R, et al. Compound heterozygosity of 2 novel MAPT mutations in frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Aging 2011; 32: 757e1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aoyagi H, Hasegawa M, Tamaoka A. Fibrillogenic nuclei composed of P301L mutant tau induce elongation of P301L tau but not wild-type tau. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 20309–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arendt T, Stieler JT, Holzer M. Tau and tauopathies. Brain Res Bull 2016; 126: 238–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong MJ, Litvan I, Lang AE, Bak TH, Bhatia KP, Borroni B, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 2013; 80: 496–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, Gass J, Rademakers R, Lindholm C, et al. Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature 2006; 442: 916–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeve BF. The multiple phenotypes of corticobasal syndrome and corticobasal degeneration: implications for further study. J Mol Neurosci 2011; 45: 350–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Borroni B, Del Bo R, Goldwurm S, Archetti S, Bonvicini C, Agosti C, et al. VEGF haplotypes are associated with increased risk to progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 21: 87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bronner IF, ter Meulen BC, Azmani A, Severijnen LA, Willemsen R, Kamphorst W, et al. Hereditary Pick's disease with the G272V tau mutation shows predominant three-repeat tau pathology. Brain 2005; 128: 2645–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burrell JR, Forrest S, Bak TH, Hodges JR, Halliday GM, Kril JJ. Expanding the phenotypic associations of globular glial tau subtypes. Alzheimers Dement 2016; 4: 6–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cairns NJ, Bigio EH, Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Lee VM, Hatanpaa KJ, et al. Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114: 5–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chahine LM, Rebeiz T, Rebeiz JJ, Grossman M, Gross RG. Corticobasal syndrome: Five new things. Neurol Clin Pract 2014; 4: 304–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaunu MP, Deramecourt V, Buee-Scherrer V, Le Ber I, Brice A, Ehrle N, et al. Juvenile frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism associated with tau mutation G389R. J Alzheimers Dis 2013; 37: 769–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiu WZ, Kaat LD, Seelaar H, Rosso SM, Boon AJ, Kamphorst W, et al. Survival in progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 441–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Combs B, Gamblin TC. FTDP-17 tau mutations induce distinct effects on aggregation and microtubule interactions. Biochemistry 2012; 51: 8597–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, Abisambra JF, Abner EL, Alafuzoff I, et al. Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol 2014; 128: 755–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, Wils H, Pirici D, et al. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature 2006; 442: 920–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. D'Souza I, Schellenberg GD. Arginine/serine-rich protein interaction domain-dependent modulation of a tau exon 10 splicing enhancer: altered interactions and mechanisms for functionally antagonistic FTDP-17 mutations Delta280K AND N279K. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 2460–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Yebenes JG, Sarasa JL, Daniel SE, Lees AJ. Familial progressive supranuclear palsy. Description of a pedigree and review of the literature. Brain 1995; 118: 1095–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Delisle MB, Murrell JR, Richardson R, Trofatter JA, Rascol O, Soulages X, et al. A mutation at codon 279 (N279K) in exon 10 of the Tau gene causes a tauopathy with dementia and supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathol 1999; 98: 62–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Deramecourt V, Lebert F, Maurage CA, Fernandez-Gomez FJ, Dujardin S, Colin M, et al. Clinical, neuropathological, and biochemical characterization of the novel tau mutation P332S. J Alzheimers Dis 2012; 31: 741–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dickson DW, Bergeron C, Chin SS, Duyckaerts C, Horoupian D, Ikeda K, et al. Office of Rare Diseases neuropathologic criteria for corticobasal degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002; 61: 935–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dickson DW, Ahmed Z, Algom AA, Tsuboi Y, Josephs KA. Neuropathology of variants of progressive supranuclear palsy. Curr Opin Neurol 2010; 23: 394–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Domoto-Reilly K, Davis MY, Keene CD, Bird TD. Unusually long duration and delayed penetrance in a family with FTD and mutation in MAPT (V337M). Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2017; 174: 70–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Donker Kaat L, Boon AJ, Azmani A, Kamphorst W, Breteler MM, Anar B, et al. Familial aggregation of parkinsonism in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 2009; 73: 98–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ferrari R, Ryten M, Simone R, Trabzuni D, Nicolaou N, Hondhamuni G, et al. Assessment of common variability and expression quantitative trait loci for genome-wide associations for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: 1514 e1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferrer I, Lopez-Gonzalez I, Carmona M, Arregui L, Dalfo E, Torrejon-Escribano B, et al. Glial and neuronal tau pathology in tauopathies: characterization of disease-specific phenotypes and tau pathology progression. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2014; 73: 81–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Frost B, Hemberg M, Lewis J, Feany MB. Tau promotes neurodegeneration through global chromatin relaxation. Nat Neurosci 2014; 17: 357–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fujioka S, Sanchez Contreras MY, Strongosky AJ, Ogaki K, Whaley NR, Tacik PM, et al. Three sib-pairs of autopsy-confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015; 21: 101–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gasca-Salas C, Masellis M, Khoo E, Shah BB, Fisman D, Lang AE, et al. Characterization of movement disorder phenomenology in genetically proven, familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0153852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gauthier-Kemper A, Weissmann C, Golovyashkina N, Sebo-Lemke Z, Drewes G, Gerke V, et al. The frontotemporal dementia mutation R406W blocks tau's interaction with the membrane in an annexin A2-dependent manner. J Cell Biol 2011; 192: 647–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ghetti B, Murrell JR, Zolo P, Spillantini MG, Goedert M. Progress in hereditary tauopathies: a mutation in the Tau gene (G389R) causes a Pick disease-like syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 920: 52–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ghetti B, Oblak AL, Boeve BF, Johnson KA, Dickerson BC, Goedert M. Frontotemporal dementia caused by microtubule-associated protein tau gene (MAPT) mutations: a chameleon for neuropathology and neuroimaging. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2015; 41: 24–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goldman JS, Farmer JM, Wood EM, Johnson JK, Boxer A, Neuhaus J, et al. Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies. Neurology 2005; 65: 1817–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Grijalvo-Perez AM, Litvan I. Corticobasal degeneration. Semin Neurol 2014; 34: 160–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gunawardana CG, Mehrabian M, Wang X, Mueller I, Lubambo IB, Jonkman JE, et al. The human tau interactome: binding to the ribonucleoproteome, and impaired binding of the proline-to-leucine mutant at position 301 (P301L) to chaperones and the proteasome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2015; 14: 3000–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Halliday GM, Song YJ, Creasey H, Morris JG, Brooks WS, Kril JJ. Neuropathology in the S305S tau gene mutation. Brain 2006; 129: E40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hauw JJ, Daniel SE, Dickson D, Horoupian DS, Jellinger K, Lantos PL, et al. Preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy). Neurology 1994; 44: 2015–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hayashi S, Toyoshima Y, Hasegawa M, Umeda Y, Wakabayashi K, Tokiguchi S, et al. Late-onset frontotemporal dementia with a novel exon 1 (Arg5His) tau gene mutation. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 525–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hodges JR, Davies R, Xuereb J, Kril J, Halliday G. Survival in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2003; 61: 349–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hogg M, Grujic ZM, Baker M, Demirci S, Guillozet AL, Sweet AP, et al. The L266V tau mutation is associated with frontotemporal dementia and Pick-like 3R and 4R tauopathy. Acta Neuropathol 2003; 106: 323–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoglinger GU, Melhem NM, Dickson DW, Sleiman PM, Wang LS, Klei L, et al. Identification of common variants influencing risk of the tauopathy progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 699–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, Baker M, Froelich S, Houlden H, et al. Association of missense and 5'-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 1998; 393: 702–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Iovino M, Agathou S, Gonzalez-Rueda A, Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera M, Borroni B, Alberici A, et al. Early maturation and distinct tau pathology in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons from patients with MAPT mutations. Brain 2015; 138: 3345–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Irwin DJ, Brettschneider J, McMillan CT, Cooper F, Olm C, Arnold SE, et al. Deep clinical and neuropathological phenotyping of Pick disease. Ann Neurol 2016; 79: 272–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Iseki E, Matsumura T, Marui W, Hino H, Odawara T, Sugiyama N, et al. Familial frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism with a novel N296H mutation in exon 10 of the tau gene and a widespread tau accumulation in the glial cells. Acta Neuropathol 2001; 102: 285–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ittner A, Chua SW, Bertz J, Volkerling A, van der Hoven J, Gladbach A, et al. Site-specific phosphorylation of tau inhibits amyloid-beta toxicity in Alzheimer's mice. Science 2016; 354: 904–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ittner LM, Fath T, Ke YD, Bi M, van Eersel J, Li KM, et al. Parkinsonism and impaired axonal transport in a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 15997–6002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ittner LM, Halliday GM, Kril JJ, Gotz J, Hodges JR, Kiernan MC. FTD and ALS–translating mouse studies into clinical trials. Nat Rev Neurol 2015; 11: 360–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jellinger KA, Attems J. Neurofibrillary tangle-predominant dementia: comparison with classical Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 113: 107–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiang Z, Tang H, Havlioglu N, Zhang X, Stamm S, Yan R, et al. Mutations in tau gene exon 10 associated with FTDP-17 alter the activity of an exonic splicing enhancer to interact with Tra2 beta. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 18997–9007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Josephs KA, Hodges JR, Snowden JS, Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Mann DM, et al. Neuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol 2011; 122: 137–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jung HH, Bremer J, Streffer J, Virdee K, Spillantini MG, Crowther RA, et al. Phenotypic variation of autosomal-dominant corticobasal degeneration. Eur Neurol 2012; 67: 142–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Katsuse O, Iseki E, Arai T, Akiyama H, Togo T, Uchikado H, et al. 4-repeat tauopathy sharing pathological and biochemical features of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathol 2003; 106: 251–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kondo S, Yamamoto N, Murakami T, Okumura M, Mayeda A, Imaizumi K. Tra2 beta, SF2/ASF and SRp30c modulate the function of an exonic splicing enhancer in exon 10 of tau pre-mRNA. Genes Cells 2004; 9: 121–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kouri N, Murray ME, Hassan A, Rademakers R, Uitti RJ, Boeve BF, et al. Neuropathological features of corticobasal degeneration presenting as corticobasal syndrome or Richardson syndrome. Brain 2011a; 134: 3264–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kouri N, Whitwell JL, Josephs KA, Rademakers R, Dickson DW. Corticobasal degeneration: a pathologically distinct 4R tauopathy. Nat Rev Neurol 2011b; 7: 263–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kouri N, Carlomagno Y, Baker M, Liesinger AM, Caselli RJ, Wszolek ZK, et al. Novel mutation in MAPT exon 13 (p.N410H) causes corticobasal degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 2014; 127: 271–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kouri N, Ross OA, Dombroski B, Younkin CS, Serie DJ, Soto-Ortolaza A, et al. Genome-wide association study of corticobasal degeneration identifies risk variants shared with progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 7247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kovacs GG, Pittman A, Revesz T, Luk C, Lees A, Kiss E, et al. MAPT S305I mutation: implications for argyrophilic grain disease. Acta Neuropathol 2008; 116: 103–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kovacs GG, Rozemuller AJ, van Swieten JC, Gelpi E, Majtenyi K, Al-Sarraj S, et al. Neuropathology of the hippocampus in FTLD-Tau with Pick bodies: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2013; 39: 166–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kovacs GG. Neuropathology of tauopathies: principles and practice. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2015; 41: 3–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lang AE. Corticobasal degeneration: selected developments. Mov Disord 2003; 18 Suppl 6: S51–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lashley T, Rohrer JD, Mead S, Revesz T. An update on clinical, genetic and pathological aspects of frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2015; 41: 858–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Le Ber I, Camuzat A, Guillot-Noel L, Hannequin D, Lacomblez L, Golfier V, et al. C9ORF72 repeat expansions in the frontotemporal dementias spectrum of diseases: a flow-chart for genetic testing. J Alzheimers Dis 2013; 34: 485–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee EB, Porta S, Michael Baer G, Xu Y, Suh E, Kwong LK, et al. Expansion of the classification of FTLD-TDP: distinct pathology associated with rapidly progressive frontotemporal degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 2017; 134: 65–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ling H, O'Sullivan SS, Holton JL, Revesz T, Massey LA, Williams DR, et al. Does corticobasal degeneration exist? A clinicopathological re-evaluation. Brain 2010; 133: 2045–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lippa CF, Zhukareva V, Kawarai T, Uryu K, Shafiq M, Nee LE, et al. Frontotemporal dementia with novel tau pathology and a Glu342Val tau mutation. Ann Neurol 2000; 48: 850–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Maltete D. Adult-onset stereotypical motor behaviors. Rev Neurol 2016; 172: 477–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Morris HR, Osaki Y, Holton J, Lees AJ, Wood NW, Revesz T, et al. Tau exon 10 +16 mutation FTDP-17 presenting clinically as sporadic young onset PSP. Neurology 2003; 61: 102–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Murrell JR, Spillantini MG, Zolo P, Guazzelli M, Smith MJ, Hasegawa M, et al. Tau gene mutation G389R causes a tauopathy with abundant pick body-like inclusions and axonal deposits. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999; 58: 1207–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Neumann M, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Crowther RA, Smith MJ, Spillantini MG, Goedert M, et al. Pick's disease associated with the novel Tau gene mutation K369I. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 503–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ouchi H, Toyoshima Y, Tada M, Oyake M, Aida I, Tomita I, et al. Pathology and sensitivity of current clinical criteria in corticobasal syndrome. Mov Disord 2014; 29: 238–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Pickering-Brown S, Baker M, Yen SH, Liu WK, Hasegawa M, Cairns N, et al. Pick's disease is associated with mutations in the tau gene. Ann Neurol 2000; 48: 859–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Pickering-Brown SM, Baker M, Nonaka T, Ikeda K, Sharma S, Mackenzie J, et al. Frontotemporal dementia with Pick-type histology associated with Q336R mutation in the tau gene. Brain 2004; 127: 1415–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Piguet O, Halliday GM, Reid WG, Casey B, Carman R, Huang Y, et al. Clinical phenotypes in autopsy-confirmed Pick disease. Neurology 2011; 76: 253–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Po K, Leslie FV, Gracia N, Bartley L, Kwok JB, Halliday GM, et al. Heritability in frontotemporal dementia: more missing pieces? J Neurol 2014; 261: 2170–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Poorkaj P, Bird TD, Wijsman E, Nemens E, Garruto RM, Anderson L, et al. Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 1998; 43: 815–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Poorkaj P, Muma NA, Zhukareva V, Cochran EJ, Shannon KM, Hurtig H, et al. An R5L tau mutation in a subject with a progressive supranuclear palsy phenotype. Ann Neurol 2002; 52: 511–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rademakers R, Neumann M, Mackenzie IR. Advances in understanding the molecular basis of frontotemporal dementia. Nature Rev Neurol 2013; 9: 240–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Reed LA, Wszolek ZK, Hutton M. Phenotypic correlations in FTDP-17. Neurobiol Aging 2001; 22: 89–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rizzini C, Goedert M, Hodges JR, Smith MJ, Jakes R, Hills R, et al. Tau gene mutation K257T causes a tauopathy similar to Pick's disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2000; 59: 990–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Rohrer JD, Guerreiro R, Vandrovcova J, Uphill J, Reiman D, Beck J, et al. The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 2009; 73: 1451–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Rohrer JD, Lashley T, Schott JM, Warren JE, Mead S, Isaacs AM, et al. Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain 2011; 134: 2565–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Rohrer JD, Nicholas JM, Cash DM, van Swieten J, Dopper E, Jiskoot L, et al. Presymptomatic cognitive and neuroanatomical changes in genetic frontotemporal dementia in the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 253–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Rojo A, Pernaute RS, Fontan A, Ruiz PG, Honnorat J, Lynch T, et al. Clinical genetics of familial progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 1999; 122: 1233–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ros R, Thobois S, Streichenberger N, Kopp N, Sanchez MP, Perez M, et al. A new mutation of the tau gene, G303V, in early-onset familial progressive supranuclear palsy. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1444–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ros R, Ampuero I, Garcia de Yebenes J. Parkin polymorphisms in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci 2008; 268: 176–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Rosso SM, van Herpen E, Deelen W, Kamphorst W, Severijnen LA, Willemsen R, et al. A novel tau mutation, S320F, causes a tauopathy with inclusions similar to those in Pick's disease. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 373–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sanchez MP, Gonzalo I, Avila J, De Yebenes JG. Progressive supranuclear palsy and tau hyperphosphorylation in a patient with a C212Y parkin mutation. J Alzheimers Dis 2002; 4: 399–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Scaravilli T, Tolosa E, Ferrer I. Progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration: lumping versus splitting. Mov Disord 2005; 20 Suppl 12: S21–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Schellenberg GD, Montine TJ. The genetics and neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol 2012; 124: 305–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Skoglund L, Viitanen M, Kalimo H, Lannfelt L, Jonhagen ME, Ingelsson M, et al. The tau S305S mutation causes frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15: 156–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Spillantini MG, Murrell JR, Goedert M, Farlow MR, Klug A, Ghetti B. Mutation in the tau gene in familial multiple system tauopathy with presenile dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 7737–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Spillantini MG, Goedert M. Tau pathology and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 609–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Stanford PM, Halliday GM, Brooks WS, Kwok JB, Storey CE, Creasey H, et al. Progressive supranuclear palsy pathology caused by a novel silent mutation in exon 10 of the tau gene: expansion of the disease phenotype caused by tau gene mutations. Brain 2000; 123: 880–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tacik P, DeTure M, Hinkle KM, Lin WL, Sanchez-Contreras M, Carlomagno Y, et al. A novel tau mutation in exon 12, p.Q336H, causes hereditary Pick disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2015a; 74: 1042–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Tacik P, DeTure M, Lin WL, Sanchez Contreras M, Wojtas A, Hinkle KM, et al. A novel tau mutation, p.K317N, causes globular glial tauopathy. Acta Neuropathol 2015b; 130: 199–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Tacik P, DeTure MA, Yari C, Lin WL, Murray ME, Baker MC, et al. FTDP-17 with pick body-like inclusions associated with a novel tau mutation, p.E372G. Brain Pathol 2017a; 27: 612–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Tacik P, Sanchez-Contreras M, DeTure M, Murray ME, Rademakers R, Ross OA, et al. Clinicopathologic heterogeneity in FTDP-17 due to MAPT p.P301L mutation, including a patient with globular glial tauopathy. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2017b; 43: 200–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Tan CF, Piao YS, Kakita A, Yamada M, Takano H, Tanaka M, et al. Frontotemporal dementia with co-occurrence of astrocytic plaques and tufted astrocytes, and severe degeneration of the cerebral white matter: a variant of corticobasal degeneration? Acta Neuropathol 2005; 109: 329–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Tuite PJ, Clark HB, Bergeron C, Bower M, St George-Hyslop P, Mateva V, et al. Clinical and pathologic evidence of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy in familial tauopathy. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1453–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Van Deerlin VM, Forman MS, Farmer JM, Grossman M, Joyce S, Crowe A, et al. Biochemical and pathological characterization of frontotemporal dementia due to a Leu266Val mutation in microtubule-associated protein tau in an African American individual. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 113: 471–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. van Herpen E, Rosso SM, Serverijnen LA, Yoshida H, Breedveld G, van de Graaf R, et al. Variable phenotypic expression and extensive tau pathology in two families with the novel tau mutation L315R. Ann Neurol 2003; 54: 573–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. van Swieten J, Spillantini MG. Hereditary frontotemporal dementia caused by Tau gene mutations. Brain Pathol 2007; 17: 63–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. van Swieten JC, Stevens M, Rosso SM, Rizzu P, Joosse M, de Koning I, et al. Phenotypic variation in hereditary frontotemporal dementia with tau mutations. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 617–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. van Swieten JC, Bronner IF, Azmani A, Severijnen LA, Kamphorst W, Ravid R, et al. The DeltaK280 mutation in MAP tau favors exon 10 skipping in vivo. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007; 66: 17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Vanacore N, Bonifati V, Colosimo C, Fabbrini G, De Michele G, Marconi R, et al. Epidemiology of progressive supranuclear palsy. European Study Group on Atypical Parkinsonisms. Neurol Sci 2001; 22: 101–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Yokota O, Tsuchiya K, Arai T, Yagishita S, Matsubara O, Mochizuki A, et al. Clinicopathological characterization of Pick's disease versus frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin/TDP-43-positive inclusions. Acta Neuropathol 2009; 117: 429–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Yoshida H, Crowther RA, Goedert M. Functional effects of tau gene mutations deltaN296 and N296H. J Neurochem 2002; 80: 548–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
Click here for additional data file. (4.7MB, pdf)
Supplementary Methods
Click here for additional data file. (294.9KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 1
Click here for additional data file. (157.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Brain are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES